• Non ci sono risultati.

fulltext

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "fulltext"

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

DOI 10.1393/ncc/i2011-10775-3 Colloquia: IFAE 2010

IL NUOVO CIMENTO Vol. 33 C, N. 6 Novembre-Dicembre 2010

Commissioning of the ATLAS Muon Trigger System

with early data

G. Artoni, F. Lo Sterzo and C. Maiani

Sapienza Universit`a di Roma and INFN, Sezione di Roma - Rome, Italy (ricevuto l’ 8 Ottobre 2010; pubblicato online l’8 Febbraio 2011)

Summary. — An overview of the early results on commissioning and performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger System is shown. The ATLAS Muon Trigger has been designed to cope with the high interaction rate expected at the LHC. The presented performance studies have been obtained using both cosmic-ray and 900 GeV collision data.

PACS 29.85.Ca – Data acquisition and sorting.

1. – ATLAS Muon Trigger

The ATLAS [1, 2] Trigger System [3] has been designed on three levels in order to reduce the high rate of collision events expected at the LHC. The goal is to have a selection that gives the highest efficiency on the physics events studied and an elevated rejection on background events. In this section we present the three levels of the muon trigger.

1.1. Muon Level-One trigger . – The Level-One (L1) muon trigger is hardware based. Its aim is to select muons giving a first estimate of their parameters. This is done using the trigger chambers: RPC (Resistive Plate Chambers) in the central region of the detector,

|η| < 1.05, and TGC (Thin Gap Chambers) in the forward region, 1.05 < |η| < 2.7.

1.2. Muon Level-Two trigger . – The Level-Two (L2) trigger uses software algorithms to reconstruct the muon parameters and apply a selection in∼ 20 ms of time:

– μFast uses both the trigger chambers and the precision chambers to perform a more accurate measurement of the muon pT using the sagitta method, η and φ in the

spectrometer.

– μComb combines μFast measurement with the corresponding Inner Detector track, improving the resolution on the muon parameters reconstruction.

c

(2)

274 G. ARTONI, F. LO STERZOandC. MAIANI

Fig. 1. – Left: calibration of RPC Timing is performed with cosmic muons using the Inner Detector TRT timing as a reference, here the difference between the two is given in units of Bunch Crossing (BC). Right: μFast sagitta reconstruction with cosmic data.

– μIso requires the muon to be isolated using the Inner Detector and Calorimeters information.

– μTile identifies muons by their energy deposit in the Tile Hadronic Calorimeter.

1.3. Muon event filter trigger . – Having about 2 seconds of time to reconstruct the event and apply a selection, the event filter is able to use the offline muon reconstruction algorithms. In analogy to the L2 algorithms, here too the muon is first reconstructed in the muon spectrometer, then combined with an Inner Detector track.

2. – Commissioning of the muon trigger with early data

In this section we present some results on the commissioning of the muon trigger system. Those results have been obtained using either the cosmic-ray data collected in 2009 or the LHC collision data collected in November-December 2009 at√s = 900 GeV.

The commissioning of the L1 muon trigger has been focused on two main aspects: the roads and the timing alignment. A muon coming from the interaction point leaves hits on the RPC (TGC) stations. The hits are spatially correlated, this correlation is exploited to select real muons looking for the hits in a “coincidence window”: the road. As for the timing alignment, the trigger devices and the readout devices have to be synchronized, and this has to be done also with respect to the other ATLAS sub-detectors in order to perform a coherent measurement on data (fig. 1 on the left).

Also the validation of the L2 and EF algorithms has been performed using both cosmic and collision data. In fig. 1, on the right, the sagitta measurement performed by μFast with cosmic data is shown.

REFERENCES

[1] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance Technical Design Report Vol. I, CERN/LHCC, 99-14/15 (1999).

[2] ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Detector and Physics Performance Technical Design Report Vol. II, CERN/LHCC, 99-14/15 (1999).

[3] ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS Muon Trigger Slice with Simulated Data, ATL-COM-PHYS-2008-067, CERN (2008).

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The stalagmites, CC53, CC4 and CC27, were collected in the so-called &#34;Galleria delle Stalattiti&#34;, a phreatic conduit in the Corchia Cave, placed ca.. The stable isotopes

With a focus on the renowned Italian–Armenian novelist Antonia Arslan’s Genocide narrative La masseria delle allodole (2004; English translation Skylark Farm, Arslan 2006), I’ll

In that case, we could say that the external control, and in particular the accounting control entrusted to the external auditor, should not be mandatory, but it should be quite

references Homology Modeling modeller Ensemble Docking glide XP Molecular Dynamic amber ligand bindng nuclear translocation AhR:ARNT dimer formation AhR:ARNT DNA binding

• Fundamental noise sources are Johnson noise in the thermistor (&lt;ΔV 2 &gt; = 4kTRΔf), temperature fluctuations in the thermistor ((&lt;ΔW 2 &gt; = 4kGT 2 Δf), background

Furthermore, the definition of the paleogeographic distribution of some of the main groups of foraminifera lets to provide a hypothesis of paleogeographic reconstruction of

Therefore, to estimate at high precision the effects due to the tails of the multiple scattering distribution, it is necessary to go beyond the approximation of indepen- dency

Ferrari S., Event marketing, i grandi eventi e gli eventi speciali come strumenti di marketing, Cedam, 2012.. Getz D., Event management and event tourism, Cognizant