• Non ci sono risultati.

35. PREDICTORS OF HER2 FISH POSITIVITY IN PRIMARY BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS SCORED 2+ WITH IHC: RESULTS OF A SINGLE INSTITUTION ANALYSIS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "35. PREDICTORS OF HER2 FISH POSITIVITY IN PRIMARY BREAST CANCER DIAGNOSIS SCORED 2+ WITH IHC: RESULTS OF A SINGLE INSTITUTION ANALYSIS"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Predictors of HER2 FISH positivity in primary breast cancer

diagnosis scored 2+ with IHC: results of a single Institution analysis

Predictors of HER2 FISH positivity in primary breast cancer

diagnosis scored 2+ with IHC: results of a single Institution analysis

Elena Barbieri

1

, Stefania R. Bettelli

2

, Federico Piacentini

1

, Guido Ficarra

2

, PierFranco Conte

1

, Valentina Guarneri

1

1Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases and 2Department of Pathology -Modena University Hospital

Elena Barbieri

1

, Stefania R. Bettelli

2

, Federico Piacentini

1

, Guido Ficarra

2

, PierFranco Conte

1

, Valentina Guarneri

1

1Department of Oncology, Hematology and Respiratory Diseases and 2Department of Pathology -Modena University Hospital

•In breast cancer, the expression of hormone receptors and of HER2 receptor are the main determinant of treatment selection

•Trastuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against HER2, is an essential component of HER2 positive breast cancer treatment

•HER-2 positivity is defined as a 3+ score in immunohistochemistry assay (defined as uniform intense membrane staining of > 30% of invasive tumor cells) or FISH amplification (ratio of HER-2 to CEP17 of > 2.2 or average HER-2 gene copy number > six signals/nucleus for those systems without an internal control probe)

•In case of 2+ staining at IHC, the test is considered equivocal and FISH is mandatory •Up to 15% of breast cancers are IHC 2+

Patients and Methods

Patients and Methods

• All breast cancer patients diagnosed in our Institution as having HER2 score 2+ by IHC were processed for FISH analysis • The following information were collected: age, expression of Hormone receptor, histologic grade and proliferation (Ki 67) • ER and PgR were defined as positive in case of IHC staining in > 10% of tumoral cells

• Histologic grade was defined according to the Elston and Ellis classification grading system.

• The association between hormone receptor expression, nuclear grade, proliferation and FISH positivity was evaluated by using Pearson chi square test for dichotomic variables, and by logistic regression for continuous variables

Aim of this study was to identify potential predictors of HER2 FISH positivity in newly diagnosed breast cancer with HER2 score 2+ by IHC

Results

Results

• In this study, the expression of hormone receptor or proliferation failed to show a significant association with FISH positivity • Histologic grade 3 was the only parameter significantly associated with FISH positivity

• This population, selected for having HER2 score 2+, appears unexpectedly enriched in HR positive cases ( 87% of patients with ER and /or pgR > 10%)

• Evaluation of the prevalence of hormone receptor positivity in patients HER2 IHC 0/1+ or 3+ diagnosed during the same years is ongoing

Conclusions

Conclusions

Background

Background

Objective

Objective

22% Amplified 77% Not amplified

HER2 FISH expression

14% Not evaluable 53% Grade 3 33% Grade 1/2 Histologic Grade 20% (0-98%) Median Ki-67 expression (range)

5% Not evaluable

48% High proliferation (Ki-67 > 20%)

47% Low proliferation (Ki-67 < 20%)

Proliferation (Ki-67)

2% Not evaluable

87.5% Positive (ER and/or PgR positive)

10.5% Negative (ER and PgR negative)

Hormone Receptor expression

2% Not evaluable

71% Positive (IHC staining > 10%)

27% Negative (IHC staining < 10%)

Progesteron Receptor expression

2.5% Not evaluable

83.5% Positive (IHC staining > 10%)

14% Negative (IHC staining < 10%)

Estrogen Receptor expression

64 (27-97) Median age at diagnosis (range)

248 Patients p=0.026 38 (74.5%) 92 (57.1%) Grade 3 13 (25.5%) 69 (42.9%) Grade1/2 p=ns 32 (59. 3%) 85 (47.2%) High Ki-67 (> 20%) 22 (40.7%) 95 (52.8%) Low Ki-67 (< 20%) p=ns 50 (89.3%) 167 (89.8%) HR positive 6 (10.7%) 19 (10.2%) HR negative p value FISH amplified FISH not amplified p=0.029 1.08;4.42 2.19 Grade 3 -Grade 1/2 p=ns 0.21;15.52 1.82 High Ki-67 (> 20%) -Low Ki-67 (< 20%) p=ns 0.33;1.49 0.70 PgR positive -PgR negative p=ns 0.54;5.07 1.66 ER positive -ER negative p value 95% CI Odds Ratio for FISH positivity

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

After normalization to take into account time variations of the spectral properties as measured by X-ray hardness, the QPO centroid frequency is observed to vary along

Ten temperature indices are selected from the list of climate extreme indices defined by the Expert Team on Climate Change Detection and Indices (ETCCDI),

Our findings, based on a task manipulation, are in line with a previous fMRI study that used a training manipulation to show increased activity in left LOTC (together with left

8 Il Consiglio di Carità, istituito dal re Carlo Alberto di Savoia con Carta reale del 17 giugno 1837, è stato preceduto dalle Congregazioni di Carità, con identiche funzioni. E

• Our best diagnostic algorithm (forced vital capac- ity &lt; 70% predicted and forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ≥ 70%) produced a far lower number of

XRF: METHOD AND RESULTS The discrimination based on the different metals (or metal alloy) used to produce the objects, suggested a further functional difference based on

21 Una giovane donna di Vercelli, ad esempio, rispondendo alla domanda n. 64: «Le capita di cambiare lingua o dialetto in base all’argomento?»... dal quale sembra potersi rivelare

This research shows how the reuse of abandoned buildings and related open spaces constitutes a significant opportunity for achieving more liveable and healthier cities through