• Non ci sono risultati.

Physical proprieties of alternative bedding materials for dairy cattle

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Physical proprieties of alternative bedding materials for dairy cattle"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

80

AIIA Section 2 – Oral Presentations

CODE: 031

Presentation: Oral

Section: Rural buildings, facilities and territory

7.22 PHYSICAL PROPRIETIES OF ALTERNATIVE BEDDING MATERIALS FOR

DAIRY CATTLE

Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz1*, Giuseppe Rossi2, Leonardo Conti2, Gabriel Araújo e Silva

Ferraz1, Lorenzo Leso2, Matteo Barbari2

1Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, PO Box 3037, Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil,

CEP 37200-000 E-mail: patrícia.ponciano@ufla.br

2Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), Università degli Studi di

Firenze.

* Author for correspondence

Abstract: Housing system can affect dairy cow’s welfare and performance and the type of bedding

used can also affect comfort and hygiene level of the animals. A wide range of different materials can be used in bedding for dairy cattle but their physical proprieties must be analyzed to evaluate their potential. Miscanthus can be considered as alternative materials to be used for bedding. Miscanthus is a woody grass that requires low input and straw are easily find in many regions. Thus, both materials can be alternatives in order to reduce costs of bedding. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the physical properties of Miscanthus in comparation to straw, as affordable alternatives to be used as bedding material in housing systems for dairy cows. Particle size, bulk density, porosity, water holding capacity from Miscanthus and straw were measured experimentally in the lab of the Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI) of the University of Florence. Particle size was determined by applying 50 g of material (Miscanthus and straw) on a shaker with six sieves during 5 min. The mean particle size influences the material mass and the resistance to compaction. Bulk density can be defined as the ratio of weight to volume and is given in kg/m³. This information is important in order to quantify volumes of products with irregular shapes. Bulk density of Miscanthus and straw was determined according to the ASABE Standard S269.4 DEC 91. One of the biggest producers’ worries is related to the amount of water in bedding because it can affect microbial activity, thermal insulation, gases emissions, odor emissions and friability. Thus, to determine the water holding capacity and porosity of bedding materials samples Australian Standards were used. Based on these physical properties results, it is expected to demonstrate the good potential to use Miscanthus as viable alternatives to straw as a bedding material for dairy cattle.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The main finding is that unregulated introduction of nanoinnovation into the food sys- tem is due to the current neoliberal food policy and to the power struggles that

OPEN ACCESS.. Subconfluent cultures are incubated with ““eluates”” for 24 hours. The MTT-formazan production is the method used for measuring the cell viability. The results

The following COVER operation produces output regions in the RES dataset where at least 2 and at most 3 regions in the EXP dataset overlap, having as resulting region attributes the

di Modena, Policlinico, Modena, Italy; 4 AUSL Romagna Forlì Hospital, General Surgery and Advanced Oncological Therapy Unit, Forlì, Italy; 5 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca

Hydrocarbons concentration trend in time was monitored in five different treatments of contaminated soil: control soil with no addition (Co), soil with 1% by weight of Meat and

The Biennial Congress of the World Asso- ciation for the History of Veterinary Medicine, hosted by the Ve- terinary History Society is to be held at Imperial College London...

Benedetto viene riconfermato per un altro anno all’ufficio di cancelleria per il salario di 140 ducati più 30 iperperi per l’affitto della

Table 3 provides the fraction of stars at each significance level relative to the total young stellar sample (column 7), and the corresponding stellar UV flux fraction relative to