6
TH
C
RITICAL
A
PPROACHES TO
D
ISCOURSE
A
NALYSIS
ACROSS
D
ISCIPLINES
C
ONFERENCE
CADAAD
2016
B
OOK OF
A
BSTRACTS
EDITED BY
MARCO VENUTI AND ANTONIO FRUTTALDO
S
TEFANIAA
RCARA University of CataniaP
AULB
AKER Lancaster UniversityG
IUSEPPEB
ALIRANOUniversity of Naples ‘L’Orientale’
D
AVIDEB
ENNATO University of CataniaC
INZIAB
EVITORI University of BolognaM
ARIAVITAC
AMBRIA University of MessinaP
IOTRC
AP University of ŁódźM
ARIAC
ARRERAS University of MurciaM
IRELLAC
ASSARINO University of CataniaD
ONATAC
UCCHIARA University of CataniaM
ANUELAD’A
MORE University of CataniaD
EBORAHD
EF
ELICE University of CataniaL
OUIS DES
AUSSURE University of NeuchâtelP
AOLOD
ONADIOUniversity of Naples Federico II
L
AURAF
ILARDO-L
LAMAS University of ValladolidB
ERNHARDF
ORCHTNER University of LeicesterF
EDERICOG
ASPARIUniversity for Foreigners of Reggio Calabria “Dante Alighieri”
G
IUSEPPEG
IURA University of PalermoS
IMONG
OODMAN Coventry UniversityI
AINH
ALLIDAY University of CataniaC
HRISTOPHERH
ART Lancaster UniversityD
ARRENK
ELSEY Newcastle UniversityM
AJIDK
HOSRAVIN
IK Newcastle UniversityO
LIVIAK
NAPTON University of BirminghamV
ERONIKAK
OLLER Lancaster UniversityN
ELYAK
OTEYKOQueen Mary University of London
M
ICHAŁK
RZYŻANOWSKI Örebro UniversityC
RISTINAL
AR
OSA University of CataniaM
ARIAG
RAZIAN
ICOLOSI University of CataniaF
ELICITASM
ACGILCHRIST Georg-August-Universität GöttingenD
AVIDM
ACHIN Örebro UniversityG
ERLINDEM
AUTNERVienna University of Economics and Business
A
NDREASM
USOLFF University of East AngliaK
IERANO’H
ALLORAN KING’s College LondonC
LAUDIAO
LIVIERI University of CataniaF
LORIANAP
UGLISI University of CataniaS
TEVEO
SWALD Flinders UniversityC
ARLOP
ENNISI University of CataniaJ
OHNR
ICHARDSON Loughborough UniversityG
IULIANAR
USSO University of CataniaC
HRISTINAS
CHÄFFNER Aston UniversityM
ARIAG
RAZIAS
INDONI University of MessinaBusiness
M
ARCOV
ENUTI University of CataniaF
RANCESCAV
IGO University of CataniaP
AOLOV
ILLANI University of SalernoR
UTHW
ODAK Lancaster UniversityOrganising Committee
A
NTONIOF
RUTTALDOUniversity of Naples Federico II
E
NZOI
ERNA University of CataniaF
ABIOLAM
ARASSÀ University of CataniaV
ALERIAM
ONELLO University of CataniaO
FFICINEC
ULTURALI SERVIZI S.
R.
L.
A
NGELAZ
OTTOLAUniversity of Naples Federico II
Conference volunteers
Student volunteers have played a crucial role in ensuring the success of CADAAD 2016 and in
supporting the overall conference and conference attendees. A special mention is reserved for the
following undergraduate, graduate and postgraduate students that have helped with the organisation
of the conference thanks to their enthusiasm, friendliness, and reliability:
M
ARIANNAA
LÙ University of CataniaM
ARCOB
ONFIGLIO University of CataniaG
IORGIAB
UFFARDECI University of CataniaR
OBERTAG
RAZIANAC
ARRUBBA University of CataniaR
ICHARDC
AVALLARO University of CataniaE
STERD
IS
ILVESTRO University of CataniaS
ALVATORED’U
RSO University of CataniaS
ARAE
LENAF
ABBIO University of CataniaG
IULIAF
ILÍ University of CataniaP
ILARA
NDREAP
IACENTI University of CataniaA
NNARITAG
IUSYP
IAZZA University of CataniaM
ARIAPAOLAP
UGLISI University of CataniaL
ORIANAR
UGGERI University of CataniaC
ARMENS
ERENAS
ANTONOCITO University of CataniaG
IORGIAMICHELAS
ORTINO University of CataniaC
HIARAT
URIANO University of CataniaThe Conference is sponsored by
I
S A HER-
STORY OFS
CIENCE POSSIBLE?
T
HE DOUBLE BIND EFFECT IN THE PRETENDED GENDER NEUTRALITY OF SCIENCE DISCOURSEMaria Carmela Agodi
3
S
TAGING THE EXEMPLARY SPEAKER:
L
ANGUAGE-
IDEOLOGICAL DISCOURSES IN A MEDIATIZED AGEJannis Androutsopoulos
4
C
LIMATE CHANGE,
ENERGY POLICY,
AND THE‘
ARGUMENTATIVE TURN’
IN CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF POLICYMAKING.
A
NALYSING THE DEBATE OVER FRACKING FOR SHALE GAS IN THEUK
Isabella Fairclough and Norman Fairclough
6
R
OUGH CROSSINGS AND SAFE HAVENS:
O
N THE CHALLENGES OF INTERDISCIPLINARY DISCOURSE STUDIESGerlinde Mautner
7
Q
UEERING CRITIQUE–
D
ISCOURSE,
BODY,
AFFECTTommaso Milani
8
C
ORPUS-A
SSISTEDD
ISCOURSES
TUDIES(CADS)
Alan Partington
9
M
ULTIMODAL RESEMIOTISATIONS ACROSS MEDIA:
U
NPACKING MEANINGS AND UNVEILING IDEOLOGIESConvenors: Maria Grazia Sindoni and Sandra Petroni
Discussant: Kay L. O’Halloran
13
L
ANGUAGING THEO
THER INTV
SERIESConvenors: Mariavita Cambria and Marco Venuti
Discussant: Stefania Rimini
15
C
RITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSES OF THEUK
GENERAL ELECTION OF2015
Convenor: Simon Goodman
Discussant: Adrian Coyle
21
M
IGRATIOND
ISCOURSES ACROSSL
ANGUAGES,
S
OCIETIES ANDD
ISCOURSEC
OMMUNITIESConvenors: Charlotte Taylor and Melani Schröter
23
C
RITICAL APPROACHES TO SUSTAINABILITYConvenor: Douglas Ponton
25
D
ISCOURSES OFE
DUCATIONAL[
DYS][
U]
TOPIAS:
I
NTERCULTURALITY AND IDEOLOGYConvenors: Fred Dervin and Ashley Simpson
27
C
OMMUNICATING THE‘
CULTURAL POLITICS’
OF THE EXTREME RIGHTConvenors: Bernhard Forchtner and Christoffer Kølvraa
Discussant: Michał Krzyżanowski
28
L
EGAL TEXTS,
LEGAL CULTURES AND PROCEDURES:
T
HEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ISSUESConvenors: Deborah De Felice, Giuseppe Giura and Carlo Pennisi
Discussants: David Nelken and Marina Kurkchiyan
30
S
OCIALM
EDIAD
ISCOURSES:
M
ULTIMODALITY,
I
NTERDICIPLINARITY ANDC
RITIQUEConvenors: Majid KhosraviNik and Darren Kelsey
32
M
ULTI(I
NTER)
CULTURALS
CHOOL INI
NCLUSIVES
OCIETIES?
C
RITICALD
ISCOURSES ANDI
NTERDISCIPLINARYA
PPROACHConvenors: Liana M. Daher, Augusto Gamuzza and Anna Maria Leonora
33
S
HOPPING AS‘
BEST PRACTICE’
–
A
NALYZINGW
ALMART’
S SUSTAINABILITY POLICIESLucia Abbamonte and Flavia Cavaliere
37
O
FFICEA
RCHITECTURE AND THES
PATIALI
DEOLOGY OFP
OST-F
ORDISMDavid Adler
38
G
UILT TRIP:
E
MOTION,
IDENTITY,
AND POWER IN MIGRANT DISCOURSEAlwin C. Aguirre
38
C
OERCIVE AND CONDUCIVE QUESTIONS AND THEIR LEGAL-
PRAGMATIC FUNCTIONS INM
ALAYSIAN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS:
A
CORPUS-
BASED FORENSIC DISCOURSE ANALYSISNurshafawati Ahmad Sani
39
“P
UT ONR
ECORD(POR)”
QUESTIONS:
A
PROSECUTOR’
S TOOL INE
GYPTIAN INTERROGATIONSNeveen Al Saeed
S
TRATEGIES OFL
EGITIMIZATION:
T
HEC
ASE OFW
OMEND
RIVING INS
AUDIA
RABIAHani Alamri
41
M
ANAGERIALD
ISCOURSE INK
UWAITIF
INANCIALO
RGANIZATIONS:
A
C
ASES
TUDYFatma AlHaidari
42
S
YNERGIZING THEO
DD:
I
NTEGRATINGC
ORPUSL
INGUISTICS ANDD
ISCOURSEA
NALYSISSadiq Altamimi Almaged
43
T
HER
OLE OFL
ANGUAGE IN THEC
ONSTRUCTION OFM
USLIMI
DENTITY INF
AMILYI
NTERACTION INS
AUDIA
RABIA:
A
S
TUDY OFI
NTERTEXTUALITY ANDP
OWERIman Almulla
44
“I
SLAMIC”
FEMININITIES:
A
CLOSE LOOK AT THE FEMALE PROTAGONISTS REPRESENTED IN THEQ
URAN’
S NARRATIVESTaira Amin
45
C
OMBINING CORPUS AND QUALITATIVE DATA TO STUDY ANTHROPOMORPHISM IN DISCOURSE ABOUT ANIMALSClyde Ancarno
45
“T
O POSE AS A CHEF”
–
V
ISUAL AND TEXTUAL REPRESENTATIONS OF MASCULINITY IN COOKBOOKSHelen Andersson and Göran Eriksson
46
N
UMEROCRACY.
H
IGHER EDUCATION IN THE NEOLIBERAL GOVERNMENTALITYJohannes Angermuller
47
D
OINGG
OOD BYL
OOKINGG
OOD:
D
ISCOURSES OFS
USTAINABLEF
ASHION ANDF
ASHIONABLES
USTAINABILITY IN THES
WEDISH PRESSJohanna Arnesson
48
EFL
T
EXTBOOKS ANDI
DENTITYC
ONSTRUCTION AMONGA
RABIC/H
EBREWS
PEAKERSMuzna Awayed-Bishara
49
“A
NGELA’
SF
ACEBOOKP
ARTY”:
M
EDIAD
ISCOURSE ON THER
EFUGEEC
RISIS ANDC
OMMENTATORSC
OUNTERN
ARRATIVESFabienne Baider, Sharon Millar and Monika Kopytowska
50
C
ONTESTATIONS AGAINST A NEW DOMINANT DISCOURSE IN POSTMODERNITY.
T
HE CONTRIBUTION OF THE ANTI-
GENDER MOVEMENT INI
TALYDaniela Bandelli
U
SING NON-
STANDARD LANGUAGE TO REPRESENT DIVERSITY AND‘
OTHERNESS’
IN CONTEMPORARYUS
TELEVISION SERIESMonika Bednarek
52
F
ASHION ON WHEELS AS A SUBJECT OF DISABILITY AND FASHION DISCOURSESNatalia Berger
53
C
ONSTRUCTING CORPORATE SELF-
IDENTITY AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH READERS:
T
HE USE OF INTERPERSONAL RESOURCES IN THEC
ORPORATES
OCIALR
ESPONSIBILITY(CSR)
ANDI
NTEGRATEDA
NNUAL(IA)
REPORTS OF SIXS
OUTHA
FRICAN COMPANIESTaryn Bernard
54
S
TUDENTS’
INTERCULTURAL COMPETENCES INI
TALY ANDG
REECERita Bertozzi and Eugenia Arvantis
55
T
HEG
RAMMAR OFM
ONEY:
A
DISCURSIVE INSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF MONEY IN LIGHT OF THE PRACTICE OF COMPLEMENTARY CURRENCIESLeander Bindewald and Jem Bendell
56
(C
O-)
CONSTRUCTING COMMUNITY-
IDENTITY:
P
RO-
INNOCENT VOICES IN THEM
EREDITHK
ERCHER MURDER CASEMaria Bortoluzzi
57
Τ
HE DISCURSIVE RESURGENCE OF THE‘
COMMUNIST ENEMY’:
T
HE USE OFG
RAMSCIAN THOUGHT IN THEG
REEK EXTREME RIGHT RHETORICSalomi Boukala
58
P
REACHING FROM A DISTANT PULPIT:
T
HEE
UROPEAN MIGRANT CRISIS SEEN THROUGH AN
EWY
ORKT
IMES EDITORIAL AND READER COMMENTSMichael S. Boyd
59
T
OWARDS A COMMON MODEL OFP
OLITICALD
ISCOURSEA
NALYSISMichael S. Boyd and Laura Filardo-Llamas
60
A
GRAMMAR OF RESISTANCE:
U
SINGC
OGNITIVEG
RAMMAR TO ACCOUNT FOR RESISTANT READINGSam Browse
61
H
OW DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AND CONCEPTUAL METAPHOR ANALYSIS CAN AID THE DECONSTRUCTION OF LINGUISTIC CONFLICT DISCOURSES–
T
HE CASE OFV
ALENCIAHanna Budig
62
C
ASAP
OUNDI
TALIA BETWEEN TRADITIONALISM AND VALUES-
HYBRIDIZATIONGiorgia Bulli
63
U
NVEILINGE
UROPEAN ATTITUDES IN THEC
ATALAN PRO-
INDEPENDENCE PROCESSGonzalo Calle Rosingana and Cristina Perales-García
T
RACKINGC
ATEGORIES ANDC
ONCEPTS INI
NTERNATIONALM
IGRATION ANDD
EVELOPMENTD
ISCOURSESBeatriz Campillo-Carrete
64
T
HE INTERPLAY OF NEWS DISCOURSE AND READERS’
COMMENTS IN THE COMMUNICATIVE CONSTRUCTION OF CITIZENSHIPAnabela Carvalho and Zara Pinto-Coelho
65
P
ROXIMIZATION IN HEALTH DISCOURSEPiotr Cap
66
T
HE HOODED STUDENT AS A METAPHOR:
M
ULTIMODAL RECONTEXTUALIZATIONS OF THE ACTIONS AND MOTIVES OF MEMBERS OF THEC
HILEAN STUDENT MOVEMENT IN ABROADCAST NEWS REPORT
Camila Cárdenas and Carolina Pérez
67
A
RGUMENTATIVE PATTERNS ACROSS CONTEXTS:
D
EBATING THER
OMANIAN DIASPORA’
S RIGHT TO VOTE ABROADAlexandru Cârlan
68
“I
DON’
T THINK THERE IS ANY MORAL BASIS FOR TAKING MONEY AWAY FROM PEOPLE”:
A
N EXPLORATION OF NEOLIBERAL POSITIONS ON TAXATIONPhilippa Carr and Simon Goodman
69
L
AW,
L
ANGUAGE ANDI
NSTITUTIONALA
NALYSISFrancesca Anna Maria Caruso
69
A
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OFY
OUT
UBE VIDEO COMMENTS ONO
CCUPYC
ENTRAL BY MAINLAND ANDH
ONGK
ONGC
HINESEMeilin Chen and John Flowerdew
70
G
ENDERING‘T
EXT’
AND‘P
LACE’
INF
ACEBOOKB
RANDP
AGE:
A
M
IXEDM
ETHODA
NALYSISHuey Fen Cheong
72
M
ULTIMODAL STORYTELLING IN THE MEDIA:
T
HE VISUAL REPRESENTATION OF THER
OMA IN THED
AILYM
AILJan Chovanec
73
W
HY ROB A BANK IN THEC
OMMUNIST REGIME?
M
EMORY AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLAUSIBILITY ACROSS CINEMATIC GENRESMălina Ciocea and Alexandru Cârlan
R
EFERRING TO THE CHILD IN THE“C
ONVENTION ON THER
IGHTS OF THEC
HILD”
INJ
APANESE.
A
LEXICAL AND DISCURSIVE APPROACHChantal Claudel and Isabelle Konuma
76
A
N ANALYSIS OF THE MASS MEDIA DYNAMICS ON THE WORLD OF LABOR:
T
HEI
TALIAN CASEVanesa Coscia
77
“I
T’
S NOT ALL DEMONS AND DEVILS,
YOU KNOW”:
D
ILEMMATIC MOMENTS INP
ENTECOSTAL ANDE
VANGELICALC
HRISTIAN TALK ABOUT(
PEOPLE WITH)
MENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONSAdrian Coyle
78
T
HE UNDERESTIMATED TREASURE:
D
IVERSITY AT SCHOOL THROUGH THE NEEDS OF TEACHERS.
I
NSIGHTS FROM A FIELDWORKLiana M. Daher, Augusto Gamuzza and Anna Maria Leonora
79
L
EGAL CULTURE AND LOCAL CONTEXT:
S
OME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCEDeborah De Felice and Giuseppe Giura
80
D
ISCOURSING ABOUTE
XCELLENTR
ESEARCH INA
USTRALIA:
I
DEOLOGICALF
OUNDATIONS,
I
NTERCULTURALI
MPLICATIONS ANDD
YSTOPIANP
OSSIBILITIESBarbara de la Harpe and Patrick A. Danaher
80
F
RAMING ARGUMENTATIVE MOVES IN FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS:
A
CRITICAL-
ANALYTICAL PERSPECTIVEKamila Dębowska-Kozłowska
81
T
HE CONSTRUAL OF CONFLICT:
L
ANGUAGE AND JUDGMENTMikołaj Deckert
82
“W
ORSE THAN THE WEAPON INDUSTRY”?
N
ARRATIVES OF VICARIOUS EXPERIENCE IN AE
UROPEAN PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANYJana Declercq and Geert Jacobs
83
N
ATIONALISM AND DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTIONS OF BORDERS IN THE2016
U
NITEDS
TATES PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNMassimiliano Demata
84
“I
T IS LIKE READING AN EXTENDED STUDENT ESSAY”:
R
EACTIONS TO CRITIQUES ABOUT THE‘
MIRACLE’
AND‘
UNORTHODOXY’
OFF
INNISH EDUCATIONFred Dervin and Ashley Simpson
85
M
ETAPHOR ANDM
YTH:
C
ONSTRUCTING ANI
DEOLOGICALF
RAMEWORK FOR THEP
LACE ANDR
OLE OF THEUS
IN THEW
ORLDFrederick J. DiCamilla
85
A
T THE BORDERS OF GENDER:
F
EMINISMS AND GOVERNING OF MIGRATION IN CONTEMPORARYI
TALYStefania Donzelli
N
ARRATIVES OF SUSTAINABLE BUSINESSES AND CONSUMERS:
A
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ARTICLES IN“T
HEG
ROCER”
Ulrike Ehgartner
87
S
UBVERTING STEREOTYPES ON MENTAL ILLNESS:
T
HE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF BIPOLAR ONY
OUT
UBEShaimaa El Naggar
88
L
EGITIMATINGA
CTION THROUGHS
TRATEGICM
ANEUVERING:
A
F
RAMEWORK FORI
NTEGRATING THED
ISCOURSE-H
ISTORICALA
PPROACH(DHA)
ANDP
RAGMA-
DIALECTICSRania Elnakkouzi
89
P
AYING THEB
LACKD
EBT:
T
HECARICOM
D
ISCOURSE ONS
LAVERY,
R
EMEMBRANCE ANDR
EPARATIONSEleonora Esposito
90
E
NGAGINGE
LEMENTARYS
CHOOLS
TUDENTS INU
NCOVERINGS
TEREOTYPES INC
HILDREN’
SB
OOKS WHILEL
EARNING AS
ECONDL
ANGUAGEJohanna Esquivel
91
D
ISCOURSES
TRATEGIES ING
OVERNANCEG
ENRES:
H
OWC
ORPORATIONSM
ANAGEE
CONOMIC ANDF
INANCIALC
RISISGaetano Falco
92
W
HATC
ONSTITUTESC
ONSTITUTIONS:
O
N THE SOCIO-
LEGAL RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONS AND LEGAL PLURALISMAlberto Febbrajo
93
A
PPROACHING THE SPECIFICITY OF POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN THE ADVANCED READING CLASSROOM:
A
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TWOU.S.
PRESIDENTIAL SPEECHES ON THE ISSUE OF MARRIAGE EQUALITYRodolfo Fenoglio and Laura Bottiglieri
93
S
TRATEGIC LITIGATIONS IN IMMIGRATION MATTER:
H
APPY ISLANDS OR VEHICLES FOR SYSTEMIC CHANGE?
Valeria Ferraris
94
T
HED
ISCURSIVEC
ONSTRUCTION OF AL
ATINA
MERICANI
DENTITY IN THEUN
M
ISSION INH
AITI(2004–2015)
José Manuel Ferreiro
95
U
NDERSTANDINGH
ONGK
ONGO
CCUPY:
A
DISCOURSE APPROACHJohn Flowerdew
98
U
NPACKING FAR-
RIGHT DISCOURSES ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE:
S
CEPTICISM AND DENIAL BY ANTI-
IMMIGRATION ANDN
ATIONALS
OCIALIST ACTORS ING
ERMANYBernhard Forchtner
99
R
ADICAL IMAGINARIES:
M
ULTIMODAL REPRESENTATIONS OF‘H
ISTORY’
AND‘N
ATURE’
ONG
ERMAN EXTREME RIGHTF
ACEBOOK PAGESBernhard Forchtner and Christoffer Kølvraa
100
P
REPARINGH
IGHERE
DUCATION STUDENTS FOR THE‘
WORLD OF WORK’.
C
AREERS ADVISERS’
EXPERT ROLES INUK
U
NIVERSITIES:
A
CRITICAL CORPUS-
BASED DISCOURSE ANALYSISMaria Fotiadou
100
T
HEN
ORMALIZATION ANDE
STRANGEMENT OFO
CCUPATION:
T
HEI
SRAELIW
ESTB
ANKP
OLITICALD
ISCOURSEElie Friedman and Dalia Gavriely Nuri
101
O
THERINGTV
FICTIONAL CHARACTERS:
A
CORPUS STYLISTIC APPROACH TO IDENTITY RE -PRESENTATION OF ORGANISED CRIME CHARACTERS ING
OMORRAH–
T
HES
ERIESAntonio Fruttaldo
102
U
SING EXPERIMENTAL METHODS TO ASSESS THE PERSUASIVENESS OF CORPORATIONS’
TRUST-
REPAIR DISCOURSE STRATEGIESMatteo Fuoli
103
I
NMATES OR PATIENTS.
N
URSING RECORDS OF PSYCHATRIC DETENTIONDariusz Galasinski
104
E
VOM
ORALES’
D
ISCURSIVER
E-F
OUNDATION OF ANI
NTERCULTURALA
BYAY
ALAKatharina Friederike Gallant
105
B
ETWEEN SELECTION AND CLASSIFICATION:
T
HEI
TALIAN MODEL OF CIVIC INTEGRATION WITHIN GOVERNMENTAL PLANNING DOCUMENTSEnrico Gargiulo
106
I
NTRA-
PROFESSIONAL INTERACTION AND THE INSTITUTIONAL IDENTITY OF THE JOURNALIST:
T
HE CASE OF TELEVISION NEWSLena Gialabouki
107
E
MPOWERINGE
UROPEANI
DENTITY.
T
HE ROLE OF TEACHER AND SOCIO-
PEDAGOGICAL DIMENSIONSAdam J. Gogacz, Giorgia Mavica and Elisa Casciaro
108
H
OW POLITICAL PARTIES IN THEUK
ORIENT THEMSELVES AROUND BUSINESSSimon Goodman and Philippa Carr
C
ORPUS-D
RIVENA
NALYSIS OF THEZ
APATISTAD
ISCOURSEIsabelle Gribomont
109
S
TAND FOR LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS.
T
HE GENDER REPRESENTATIONS IN THE STATEMENTS OF PRINCIPLES UNDER THEF
RENCHF
IFTHR
EPUBLIC(1958
–
2007)
Magali Guaresi
110
C
HANGINGN
ARRATIVES OFC
LASS INP
RINTM
EDIAD
ISCOURSES IN THEU
NITEDK
INGDOM,
2007–2013:
L
ANGUAGE OFS
OCIALC
LASS,
A
SPIRATION AND(I
N)E
QUALITY INO
PINIOND
ISCOURSE OF THEB
RITISHQ
UALITYP
RESSJán Haláček
111
D
EFENSIVE SEMIOTIC STRATEGIES IN GOVERNMENT COMMUNICATION:
A
MULTIMODAL STUDY OF BLAME AVOIDANCESten Hansson
112
E
XPLORING PRE-
SERVICE TEACHERS’
CONCEPTUALISATIONS OFE
NVIRONMENTALE
DUCATION FORS
USTAINABILITY THROUGHA
PPRAISAL ANALYSIS:
A
CASE STUDY IN ANA
USTRALIAN REGIONAL UNIVERSITYJoy Hardy and Nadine McCrea
113
S
PACE AND EVALUATION IN DISCOURSE ON POLITICAL PROTESTS:
A
N EXPERIMENTAL CASE STUDY INCDA
Christopher Hart
114
B
ETWEEN HATRED AND SOLIDARITY:
H
OW CO-
OCCURRING NOUNS HELP US TO DESCRIBE IDEOLOGICALLY CHARGED CONCEPTSValerie Hekkel
114
W
HO,
WHAT AND WHERE IS THE CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYST?
Juliet Henderson
115
I
DEOLOGICAL CONTENTS AND CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURES OF THEW
EATHERMAN MANIFESTO:
T
OWARD A FRAME SPACE MODELJeremy Holland
116
T
ALKING ABOUT THE JOB:
T
HE INFLUENCE OF MANAGEMENT ON LEADERSHIP DISCOURSESLise-Lotte Holmgreen and Jeanne Strunck
117
I
T IS COMPLETELY OK TO NOT BE IN THE FIGHTING SPIRIT MOOD ALL THE TIME–
M
ETAPHORS AND NORMALITY INS
WEDISH CANCER TALKCharlotte Hommerberg and Anna W. Gustafsson
A
N(
UN)
NECESSARY CRISIS:
IAEA’
S RESOLUTION ONI
RAN’
SPMD
CASE IN SELECTEDI
RANIAN NEWSPAPERSZahra Hosseini Khoo and Helmut Gruber
121
A
B
LENDINGT
HEORYA
PPROACH TOP
OLITICALC
ARTOONS INP
OST-R
EVOLUTIONE
GYPTWesam M A Ibrahim
122
B
REAKING THE SILENCE:
C
OMPARING DISCOURSES OF POSTNATAL DEPRESSION IN THEB
RITISH PRESS AND ONLINE SUPPORT GROUPSSylvia Jaworska and Karen Kinloch
123
F
ROM SERIOUS CRIME TO MOCKING ENTERTAINMENT:
T
HE SONNET-
LIKE VOLTA AND‘
VOICING CONTRAST’
OF THE CROSS-
EXAMINATION TURN IN19
TH CENTURYO
LDB
AILEY TRIALSAlison Johnson
124
W
RESTLING WITH THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN‘I
DON’
T KNOW’
AND‘I
DON’
T UNDERSTAND’
IN DISCOURSES CONCERNING PEOPLE’
S DECISIONS NOT TO VOTE IN THE2015
UK
G
ENERAL ELECTIONSusan Jones and Laura Robinson
125
E
VERYONE’
S A CYNIC:
A
DISCURSIVE EXAMINATION OF POLITICAL CYNICISM IN MEDIA POLITICAL DEBATEAdam Jowett
125
W
ORLDVIEWS IN SPACE AND TIME:
D
IVERSITY IN EVALUATIVE REASONING AND INTENTIONS FOR ACTIONBertie Kaal
126
A
LL THEB
EST!
P
ERFORMING SOLIDARITY IN POLITICAL DISCOURSEZohar Kampf
127
P
OLITICALC
ONDEMNATIONS:
P
UBLICS
PEECHA
CTS AND THEM
ORALIZATION OFD
ISCOURSEZohar Kampf and Tamar Katriel
128
F
ROM MORAL MONOLINGUALISM TO MARKETPLACE MULTILINGUALISM:
C
ONTRASTING POLICY DISCOURSES INC
ALIFORNIA’
S1998
BILINGUAL EDUCATION BAN AND THE COMING2016
REPEAL VOTENoah Katznelson and Katie A. Bernstein
129
I
DEOLOGY,
M
ULTIMODALITY AND THEV
ISUALG
RAMMAR OFISIS/DAESH’
SN
EWM
EDIAC
OMMUNICATIONSSurinderpal Kaur, Su’ad Awab, Majid KhosraviNik and Fauziah Taib
130
“E
VERYTHING ELSE IS SOMETHING DIFFERENT”:
O
NLINE CONSTRUCTION OF MARRIAGE IN THE INITIATIVE“I
N THEN
AME OF THEF
AMILY”
Ana Kedveš
D
ISCOURSE,
AFFECT AND SURVEILLANCE:
G
ENDER CONFLICT IN THE OMNIOPTICONDarren Kelsey
132
B
ELONGING,
RURAL IDENTITY,
‘
RED BRICK’
ARCHITECTURE AND PREJUDICE:
E
XAMINING THE WAY RESIDENTS TALK ABOUT THE RURAL NATURE OF THEIR AREA TO THE EXCLUSION OFP
OLISH MIGRANTSNathan Kerrigan
132
A
TTITUDES OFUKIP
VOTERS TOWARDS IMMIGRATION,
BEFORE AND AFTER THE2015
G
ENERALE
LECTIONNathan Kerrigan and Gavin Sullivan
133
S
OCIALM
EDIAC
RITICALD
ISCOURSES
TUDIES(SM-CDS):
T
OWARDS ACDA
APPROACH TO DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON PARTICIPATORY WEBMajid KhosraviNik
134
H
OODLUMS,
U
PSTARTS ANDB
OURGEOIS INR
USSIANTV
S
ERIESKatharina Klingseis
135
I
DEOLOGICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS AND NONSTANDARD ORTHOGRAPHIESLiis Kollamagi
135
G
ENDERED SEMIOTICS IN THE DISCOURSE OF FEMALE CANCER CHARITIESVeronika Koller
136
“[I]
T LOOKS LIKE A COUNTRY,
SMELLS LIKE A COUNTRY,
TASTES LIKE A COUNTRY…”:
T
HEEU
ONW
IKIPEDIASusanne Kopf
137
C
OVERING GLOBAL TERRORISM:
F
ROM SPACE TO AXIOLOGY ACROSS NEWS GENRESMonika Kopytowska
138
A
BLEISM ATW
ORK:
R
ECONSTRUCTINGB
LIND ANDP
ARTIALLYS
IGHTEDP
EOPLE’
SP
ROFESSIONALI
DENTITIESGerrit Kotzur
138
D
ISCOURSE OFM
IGRATION INC
ONTEMPORARYR
USSIANM
ASSM
EDIA FROM AM
ULTIMODALL
INGUISTICSP
ERSPECTIVEMichał Kozdra
139
P
OLITICISATION,
M
EDIATISATION ANDS
OCIAL/O
NLINEM
EDIA:
D
ISCURSIVES
HIFTS AND THER
EFUGEEC
RISISC
OGNITIVE-
PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO THE COMMODIFICATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA:
C
ONTEXT MANIPULATION AS A VEHICLE FOR IDEOLOGYElla Lillqvist and Anu A. Harju
143
“N
O SERIOUS ACCIDENT HAPPENED THIS YEAR”:
V
OLUNTARY DISCLOSURES BYC
HINESE STATE-
OWNED ENTERPRISES INVOLVED IN FATAL WORK ACCIDENTSYuting Lin
144
T
EXTUAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF DESIRE:
THE BODY IN ONLINE EROTICAAlon Lischinsky
145
P
RODUCINGS
OLDIERB
OY:
S
PERMD
ONORD
ISCOURSE ANDM
ILITARISM INI
SRAELOren Livio
146
T
HE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF A POST-9/11
FIELD OFUS
(
IN)
SECURITYMalcolm N. MacDonald and Duncan Hunter
147
#
ICANTBREATHE.
I
DEOLOGY AND CONSENSUS:
T
WITTER VS.
THE MEDIAStefania Maci
148
N
ATIONALISM INI
TALIAN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ONT
WITTEREleonora Mamusa
149
A
N EXPLORATION OF PROFESSIONAL BORDERS BETWEEN PEER SPECIALISTS AND SOCIAL WORKERS IN COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SETTINGSMichael A. Mancini
150
151
152
R
HETORIC ANDD
ECISION-M
AKING INM
EDIAC
ALLS FORA
CTION:
A
D
ISCOURSEA
NALYSIS OFA
DVOCACYC
AMPAIGNSIrina Diana Mădroane
153
I
NDIVIDUALP
OSITIONINGW
ORK AND THEM
OBILIZATION OFR
ESPONSIBILITY INO
RGANIZATIONALD
ISCUSSIONS ONS
OCIALS
USTAINABILITYElizabeth R. Miller
154
F
IGURATIVE LANGUAGE IN THE RIGHT-
WINGP
OLISH DISCOURSE ON IMMIGRATION:
155
R
EPRESENTING‘
WHO WE ARE’
AND‘
WHAT WE DO’:
A
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL TOURISM WEBSITES INM
ALAYSIAZuraidah Mohd Don and Wang Nan
155
S
ARAH ANDT
AMMY:
B
UTCH ANDF
EMME INT
RANSPARENTFabiola Marassà and Valeria Monello
Georg Marko
I
MMUNIZATION CRITICS OR ANTI-
VAXXERS?
A
CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE DISCOURSE OF THE ANTI-
VACCINE MOVEMENTB
ETWEEN INNOVATION AND TRADITIONM
AY THEF
ANB
E WITHY
OU!
L
ANGUAGINGA
UTHORIALITY ANDR
EPRESENTATION BETWEEN‘P
AN-
FANATICISM’
AND‘A
UG-
MELTED’
R
EALITYIlaria Moschini
156
A
NECDOTAL NEWS REPORTING:
R
ECOUNTING ELECTIONEERING EVENTS INR
UNYANKORE-R
UKIGALevis Mugumya
157
‘N
UDGE’
TACTICS IN PREEMPTIVE HEALTH POLICY:
M
ULTIMODAL STRATEGIES OF PERSUASION AND LEGITIMATION IN THEUK
‘C
HANGE4L
IFE’
ANTI-
OBESITY CAMPAIGNJane Mulderrig
158
C
HANGE MANAGEMENT:
T
HE GRAMMAR IS THE MESSAGEAnne Murphy and Veronika Koller
159
T
HE POLITICAL CREATION OF UNA
USTRALIANNESS:
A
CRITICAL STUDY OF IN-
GROUP CONSTRUCTION AND SUBVERSIONJill C. Murray
160
I
MAGE REPAIR OR SELF-
DESTRUCTION?
A
CORPUS-
ASSISTED DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF RESTAURANTS’
RESPONSES TO ONLINE REVIEWSAntonella Napolitano and Maria Cristina Aiezza
161
“W
OMEN AND WORK”:
A
CROSS-
LINGUISTIC CORPUS-
ASSISTED DISCOURSE STUDY ING
ERMAN AND INI
TALIANChiara Nardone
162
S
KILLING THE NATION,
EMPOWERING THE CITIZEN:
N
EOLIBERAL LOGIC INS
INGAPORE’
SS
KILLSF
UTURE INITIATIVECarl Jon Way Ng
163
I
NVESTIGATINGLGBTI
A
SYLUMC
LAIMS IN THEUK:
A
NA
NALYSIS OF THEJ
UDICIALR
EVIEWSMaria Cristina Nisco
164
I
DENTITY PRODUCTION INF
AMILYV
IDEOCONFERENCES:
A
MULTIMODALA
NALYSISSigrid Norris
165
A
CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF HOWT
HEG
UARDIAN CONSTRUEDY
ANISV
AROUFAKISGerard O’Grady
167
J
OURNALISTIC DISCOURSE ABOUTG
YPSIES INS
PAIN:
A
NALYZING SHIFTING REPRESENTATIONS FROM THE DEMOCRATIC TRANSITION TO THE PRESENTJoan M. Oleaque Moreno
169
SAPS
(S
OUTHA
FRICANP
OLICES
ERVICE)-SPEAK.
T
RANSFORMATION,
CONFUSION AND REPRESENTATION OF VOICES IN THE INTERNAL DOCUMENTS OF THE POST-
APARTHEID POLICEClaudia Ortu
170
“L
EP
ERILN
OIR”:
S
UB-S
AHARANI
MMIGRANTS INM
OROCCANN
EWSPAPERSMohammed Ouhemmou
172
F
ROM THEATRE TO DIGITAL PERFORMANCE:
R
ESTAGING,
REMEDIATING AND RESEMIOTISING VIA SOCIAL MEDIASandra Petroni
173
A
NEW POLITICS OF‘
FEAR’
OR FEAR OF NEW POLITICS?
T
HE CONSTRUCTION OF ANTI-EU
ISM INUKIP’
S DISCOURSE PRACTICESGiusy Piatto
174
H
OW SUSTAINABLE IS THE CONCEPT OF‘
SUSTAINABILITY’
IN THE TOURISM MARKET?
Douglas Mark Ponton and Vincenzo Asero
175
“D
ISARM THE PATIENTS”:
A
NALYSING AGENCY INV
IOLENCE METAPHORS IN THE ONLINE DISCOURSE OF END-
OF-
LIFE CARE PROFESSIONALSAmanda Potts
176
T
HE FORMATION OF ADVOCACY COALITIONS IN THEG
ERMAN BIOFUEL POLICY:
A
MEDIA DISCOURSE ANALYSISJudith Puttkammer and Harald Grethe
177
C
RITICALL
ANGUAGEA
NALYSIS OFP
ALESTINIAN ANDI
SRAELIO
NLINEJ
OURNALISM IN THE2014
G
AZAW
ARRami Qawariq
177
H
UMANR
IGHTSC
ULTURE ANDC
ONTENTA
NALYSISMarco A. Quiroz Vitale and Enrico Damiani di Vergada Franzetti
178
T
HE CONSTRUCTION OF STANCE IN PRE-
QUOTATION CLAUSES:
R
EPORTING‘
SIGNALS’
IN NEWS COVERAGE OF A PUBLIC SECTOR WORKERS’
STRIKE IN TWOB
OTSWANA NEWSPAPERSBoitshwarelo Rantsudu
179
M
APPING THE DISCOURSE OF PROFESSIONAL IDENTITY AND VALUES OF JOURNALISM STUDENTS,
PRACTICING JOURNALISTS AND INDUSTRYSally Reardon
180
A
FFINITY SPACES VS.
C
OMMUNITIES OFP
RACTICE IN LANGUAGE DEBATES ON THE INTERNET:
T
HE LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTION OF AV
IRTUALC
OMMUNITYAntonio Reyes
M
AKING‘
MEMORY MAKERS’:
I
NTERPOLATION,
NORM CIRCLES AND THEH
OLOCAUSTM
EMORIALD
AYT
RUSTJohn E. Richardson
182
W
HAT DOES APPROACHINGB
RITISH FASCISM AS CULTURE OFFER TOC
RITICALD
ISCOURSES
TUDIES?
John E. Richardson
183
U
SINGCDA
TOP
ROVOKE ANDS
TUDYR
ACIALL
ITERACYRebecca Rogers
184
F
ROM OPERA TO FILM OPERA:
A
CASE OF MULTI-
LAYERED RESEMIOTISATIONSFabio Rossi and Maria Grazia Sindoni
185
T
HE INFLUENCE OF VALUE PRIORITIES ON SELF-
CONCEPTS FOR ADAPTATION TO EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT:
A
STUDY WITH IMMIGRANT ADOLESCENTSElisabetta Sagone, Maria Elvira De Caroli, Orazio Licciardello and Daniela
Damigella
186
H
ERMENEUTICS OF THE SUBJECT AS MULTIMODAL GLOBALIZED DISCOURSE:
G
AYCOMMEMORATION OF
P
IERRES
EEL IN THE RECEPTION OFI
LR
OSAN
UDO/
T
HEN
AKEDR
OSEIN
I
TALYPaul Sambre
187
S
TUDENTB
IOGRAPHIES.
U
NEXPECTEDP
ATHWAYS OFY
OUNGI
MMIGRANTSMariagrazia Santagati
188
A
NEW KIND OFP
ROBATION INI
TALY:
E
XPERIENCES AND PRACTICES IN THE SOCIO-
LEGAL FIELDChiara Scivoletto
188
W
HO IS IN CONTROL OF YOUR SEXUAL HEALTH?
A
DISCURSIVE EXAMINATION OF SELF-SURVEILLANCE IN
HIV
ANDAIDS
PREVENTION CAMPAIGNSIrene Segopolo
189
F
RAMING THEP
RESIDENT AS ANE
FFECTIVEC
RISISM
ANAGER:
A
C
ORPUS-
BASEDA
NALYSIS OFC
RISISR
HETORIC INA
MERICANF
OREIGNP
OLICYD
ISCOURSEChristine S. Sing
190
H
OW SUSTAINABLEE
UROPEAN ENERGY COMPANIES ARE:
C
ORPUS-
BASED INSIGHTS FROM CORPORATE PRESS RELEASES BY COUNTRYHanna Skorczynska
U
TOPIA OFG
LOBALT
ERTIARYE
DUCATION:
T
HED
ISCOURSE OF‘C
RITICALT
HINKING’
Xianlin Song and Greg McCarthy
194
T
RANSLATING NEWS DISCOURSE ON THEC
RIMEAN CONFLICT:
W
HERECDA
ANDT
RANSLATIONS
TUDIES MEETAnneleen Spiessens and Piet Van Poucke
195
I
F THEY SPEAK IN DIALECT,
KNIFE THEM:
N
ORMALIZED AGGRESSION AND(
EXTRA)
LINGUISTIC CONFLICT IN PROMOTING STANDARDC
ROATIAN ON NATIONAL TELEVISIONAnđel Starčević
196
T
HE CONSTRUCTION OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITY IN“E
UROPE’
S”
MIGRANT CRISIS–
A
STUDY ON NEWS AGENCY REPORTSMaija Stenvall
197
T
HE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF LEADERSHIP IN CORRUPT TIMES:
R
EINVENTING THE LEADERArran Stibbe
198
P
OWER,
DISCOURSE AND‘
THE INTERNATIONAL’:
A
F
OUCAULDIAN DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OFH
IGHERE
DUCATION STRATEGY AT TWOS
COTTISH UNIVERSITIESDalene Swanson and Emma Guion Akdag
199
M
ICRO–
MESO–
MACRO MOVEMENTS:
A
NALYZING THE VALUE OF TRUTH IN NEO-
LIBERAL POLICY TEXTS THROUGH METAPHORSNadira Talib and Richard Fitzgerald
200
G
LOCALIZINGS
INGAPORE:
A
C
RITICALA
NALYSIS OFS
INGAPORE’
SN
ATIONALD
AYR
ALLYS
PEECHPeter Teo
200
S
TREAM OF CONSEQUENCE:
A
CRITICAL METAPHOR ANALYSIS OF PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES ABOUT RESTRICTIVE POLITICS TOWARDSB
OSNIAN ANDS
YRIAN ASYLUM-
SEEKERS INN
ORWAYJovana Todorovic
201
G
ENDERED DISCOURSES IN A‘
POLICY PACKAGE FOR CREATING A SOCIETY IN WHICH ALL WOMEN SHINE’
Ayako Tominari
202
“I
SAID WE SHOULD JUST BE FRIENDS”:
N
ON-
CONFORMINGF
EMALED
ISCOURSE INM
ASTERS OFS
EXLaura Tommaso
203
T
HE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF FEAR BY THE VICTIMS OF THEC
HILEANM
ILITARYR
EGIMEElizabeth Torrico-Ávila
L
ATE MODERN(
NON)
IDENTITIES.
O
PERATIONALIZING A PRAGMATIC FRAMEWORK IN ACDA
OF ONLINE SELF-
REPRESENTATIONEva Triebl
205
C
ONSTRUCTINGH
ISPANICM
ASCULINITY:
A
C
RITICALD
ISCOURSEA
NALYSIS OFN
EWSR
EPORTING INT
WOA
MERICANN
EWSPAPERSTommaso Trillò
206
A
DIACHRONIC DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF WOMEN’
S ROLES IN PARTNER RELATIONSHIPS INF
LEMISH WOMEN’
S MAGAZINESMaaike Van de Voorde and Martina Temmerman
207
W
ORLDW
ARI
INF
RENCH ANDG
ERMAN HISTORY TEXTBOOKS.
A
WAR WITHOUT BELLIGERENTS?
Patricia von Münchow
208
E
VALUATION OF‘
COMMUNITIES’
IN MIGRATION DISCOURSEMarie Veniard, Charlotte Taylor, Melani Schröter and Andreas Blätte
209
T
HEP
OLITICS OFA
CADEMICK
NOWLEDGEP
RODUCTION:
M
OVEMENTS ACROSSC
ENTRES ANDP
ERIPHERIESDimitra Vladimirou and Maria Daskalaki
210
T
HE CONSTRUCTION OF HIERARCHY IN SECONDARY SCHOOL GROUP ACTIVITIES INJ
APAN:
A
CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYTIC PERSPECTIVEZi Wang
211
F
ROM PROTEST TO MUSIC VIDEO TO ON-
LINE VIEWER COMMENTS:
S
HIFTING POLITICAL DISCOURSE IN SOCIAL PROTESTLyndon CS Way
211
“A
N
EWL
EVEL”:
A
CORPUS-
BASED METHOD FOR THE CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER-VARIANT IDENTITY REPRESENTATIONS VIA
T
WITTERLexi Webster
212
F
ROMP
HONOGRAPHR
ECORDS TOM
OVIES:
T
HE RECONTEXTUALIZATION OF PRE-
EXISTING MUSIC INTO FILM SOUNDTRACKSJohnny Wingstedt
213
E
VALUATION OF RESEARCH IMPACT AND THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF ACADEMIC ETHOSMarta Natalia Wróblewska
C
REATING THEU
TOPIA OF AN‘A
SIANE
DUCATION’
IN THEF
RENCHM
EDIA:
A
J
OURNEY INTON
OSTALGIAE-Lynn Yeow and Regis Machart
216
D
IALOGICA
NALYSIS OFD
ISCOURSES OFF
AMILIALL
OVE INR
USSIANC
ULTUREOlga Zaytseva
216
T
RANSGENDER IN THE SPOTLIGHT.
T
HE OTHER-
REPRESENTATION OF TRANS PEOPLE IN THEB
RITISH PRESS:
A
CORPUS-
BASED DISCOURSE ANALYSISAngela Zottola
Maria Carmela Agodi
Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II
mariacarmela.agodi@unina.it
The presentation addresses the contribution of discourse analysis to science studies and to ‘women-in-science’ as a research topic.
The first one results in revealing the multi-layered and complex nature of scientific discourse, contrasting the dominant view presenting it as a consistently evolving account about nature from which experiments eliminate inconsistencies and paradoxes.
The second one points to the embeddedness of gender issues in the structural and organizational relationships shaping scientific and academic environments, notwithstanding dominant accounts relegating them to the private sphere while concealing the gendered character of the social organization of techno-science. General support given to the still prevailing view of the scientific endeavour as a gender-neutral one makes it difficult the overcoming of the private/public dichotomy for a positive confrontation with the relevance of the gender dimension in scientific practice.
The relevance of the private-public dichotomy to the definition of science as public knowledge, together with the ambivalence surrounding the shifting borders between its implied demarcations, when confronted with the changing gender order, generate communication entanglements and control mechanisms which can be understood through the concept of “double bind”. The concept, first used by the anthropologist Gregory Bateson in discussing the complexity of social communication and its relatedness to the non-organic causes of schizophrenia, is well known in psychology but also relevant in communication studies. It denotes a distressful dilemma in communication, stemming from two contextual messages, the one negating the other, received within an asymmetrical power relationship. People subject to it, can neither be positively responsive nor opt out of the confusing situation, being caught in a paradoxical and confusing situation
Discourse analysis shows to be an analytical perspective well suited to reveal a her-story of silenced scientific knowledge implied and concealed within the history of science and within scientific discourse, since its beginning. Key male scientists as Kepler and Boyle appear as part of the non-linear path through which science emerged as a gendered enterprise, while at the same time being presented as a universal endeavour.
Contemporary women scientists’ accounts of their biographical trajectories – at the micro level – and official documents about the gender gap in science – at the macro level – when analysed through discourse analysis, both reveal this double bind effect.
Do feminist science studies offer adequate ways to overcome this double bind effect? Is it possible to make explicit the implicit her-story of science? Some suggestions toward a possible answer are looked for while applying discourse analysis to some of the most cited texts dealing with women in science as a scientific topic.
Staging the exemplary speaker:
Language-ideological discourses in a mediatized age
Jannis Androutsopoulos
Universität Hamburg
jannis.androutsopoulos@uni-hamburg.de
Discourses about language in society are a point of convergence between language ideology research and critical discourse analysis, two paradigms that evolved independently of one another but share a number of interests around the nexus of language, power and representation (Blommaert 1999, Blackledge 2005, Milani and Jonson 2008). These two paradigms differ in their orientation to media discourse data. Much CDA work is concerned with newspaper data, leaving the role of multimodality in metalinguistic discourses largely unexplored. Language-ideologies research examines semiotic principles of ideology formation that operate across modalities of language (Irvine and Gal 2000) and the role of audiovisual representations in the discursive construction of exemplary speakers, which in turn are central to enregisterment (Agha 2003, 2007, Androutsopoulos 2014). Navigating between these two paradigms, my aim in this talk is to emphasise the importance of multimodal resources and multimedia representations in language-ideological discourses. Drawing on the representation of regional dialects and multi-ethnic registers of German (Androutsopoulos 2010, 2011, 2013), I focus on three claims:
In mediatized societies, language-ideological discourses evolve in a reciprocal indexical tie between mediated representations and metalinguistic discourses on the ground, each becoming meaningful by indexing the other.
Mediated representations of linguistic differentiation draw on multimodal staging techniques, such as language/image compositions, montage, overlay, and subtitling, which are relevant in how performed registers of speech and their exemplary speakers are labelled, contrasted, and evaluated. Social media offer new opportunities of active participation in language-ideological discourses,
thereby fragmenting the traditional monopoly of mass-media organisations in producing metalinguistic representations and shaping language ideologies.
References
Agha, Asif (2003) The social life of cultural value. Language and Communication 23: 231–73. Agha, Asif (2007) Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2010) Ideologizing ethnolectal German. In: Sally Johnson and Tommaso M. Milani (eds) Language ideologies and media discourse, 182–202. London: Continuum.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2011) Die Erfindung‚ des’ Ethnolekts. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und
Linguistik 164, 93–120.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (2013) Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: Performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube. In: Deborah Tannen and Anna Marie Trester (eds) Discourse 2.0. Language
and new media, 47–71. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Androutsopoulos, Jannis (ed. 2014) Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. Blackledge, Adrian (2005) Discourse and power in a multilingual world. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia:
Benjamins.
Blommaert, Jan (1999) The debate is open. In: Jan Blommaert (ed.) Language ideological debates, 1–38. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Irvine, Judith T. and Susan Gal (2000) Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In: Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.) Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Climate change, energy policy, and the ‘argumentative turn’ in critical discourse
analysis of policymaking.
Analysing the debate over fracking for shale gas in the UK
Isabela Fairclough
University of Central Lancashire
ifairclough@uclan.ac.uk
Norman Fairclough
Lancaster University
n.fairclough@lancaster.ac.uk
We apply the ‘argumentative’ version of CDA of Fairclough & Fairclough (2012) in critical analysis of the making and implementation of policies for climate change and energy security in the UK, with particular reference to ‘fracking’ for shale gas. We claim that practical argumentation in deliberative activity types is an inherent part of politics and policy making, and also a necessary focus in analysis of policy and of the public debate over policy, rather than just a useful option in analysis.
The UK is widely perceived as having a problem of ‘energy security’, given anticipated future needs for gas, declining indigenous supply and unreliable foreign sources. The government has declared its support for shale gas exploitation, representing it as ‘bridge’ to a low-carbon future. While the government issues licences for shale gas exploration, planning permission for exploratory drilling and commercial fracking rests with local authorities. This has led to long-drawn-out struggles over whether permission should be given for particular sites, culminating in the decision taken by Lancashire County Council (LCC) in June 2015 to refuse two applications by Cuadrilla for exploratory drilling in the Fylde area.
We look at the LCC’s decision to reject these applications, focusing on the way in which institutional constraints (in the form of which reasons may or may not count, or who has the right to decide) have shaped the decision-making process. We show how expert risk-management discourse was used to neutralize most of the strongest public objections against fracking, leaving councillors only a small range of (noise, visual and traffic) ‘impacts’ as non-overridable grounds for rejection. Together with the fact that a wide range of other anti-fracking arguments could not be taken into account, being beyond the remit of the LCC planning committee, this resulted in an impoverished decision-making process and an easily contestable final decision. In analyzing deliberation and decision-making in institutional contexts, we draw upon Searle’s (2010) theory of the creation of social reality by speech acts of declaration, which includes a definition of political power in terms of the role that deontic reasons for action play in enabling and constraining practical reasoning and agency.
We then turn to the debate over UK policy on fracking, and develop our earlier account of practical argumentation in CDA to show what this approach can add to critical policy studies, and to the debate within it over the status of argumentation (Fairclough 2013). We show that the approach can elucidate major aspects of policy making and policy analysis, including: problem definition; the relation between problem and solution; variation, selection and retention of policy goals and of strategies for achieving them; explanation and explanatory critique; and relations between facts and values. We argue for a dialectical account of relations between discursive and ‘non-discursive’ facets of policy making which is consistent with dialectical critical realism (Bhaskar 1993). Practical argumentation conceived in such terms is an inherent part of policy making and a necessary focus in policy analysis. Moreover, critical policy analysis, critical social analysis more generally, and CDA in particular are themselves forms of practical argumentation. Analysis of practical argumentation is of great importance for CDA, because it is in practical argumentation that relations between discourse and ‘non-discursive’ elements of social life are most crucially at issue, in the linking of analysis and normative critique of existing states of affairs; explanation and explanatory critique of existing states of affairs; and action to change them.
Gerlinde Mautner
Wienna University of Economics and Business
gerlinde.mautner@wu.ac.at
It is generally taken as read that Critical Discourse Studies is a cross-disciplinary undertaking. Or ought to be, in the best of all possible worlds. Yet when it comes to drawing up actual research designs, collecting data and liaising with colleagues from other fields, a number of theoretical, methodological and practical obstacles tend to crop up. As a result, interdisciplinary collaboration is not as widespread and intensive as we may wish; indeed, researchers interested in discourse can appear to be operating almost in parallel worlds, non-communicating, disconnected and apparently self-sufficient. ‘Mixed methods’ may be all the rage, but in practice not many are willing to venture outside their methodological comfort zone (or can afford to, given the constraints of ever more rigorous and short-termist Research Assessment regimes). In the study of organizational discourse, for example, there continues to be a macro-micro divide which few researchers even attempt to cross, and even fewer cross successfully. What is more, as linguists, we need to face up to the fact that those we want to work with often do not even have linguistics on their radar, let alone have a clear idea of what it may be able to contribute. Academic tribalism is rife and has created precisely the type of ingroup/outgroup divides that we are quick to spot and criticize in other social domains. The talk will discuss these issues, as well as mapping out key challenges that await CDS in future, both within and across disciplines.
Queering critique – Discourse, body, affect
Tommaso Milani
University of Witwatersrand
Tommaso.Milani@wits.ac.za
“Queering critique” is an ambiguous title. Analogous to similar constructions in English, e. g. “opening doors” or “threatening homosexuals” where the –ing form can either be a transitive verb followed by a direct object or a qualifier of the following noun, the ambiguity of the title lies in whether the reader interprets critique as the agent or the patient of the action of queering. Where critique is the agent, we are dealing with a specific type critique, one that engenders some kind of queer characteristic or performance. Instead, where critique is the object of queering, it refers to a broader academic enterprise of bringing under a queer epistemological spotlight all forms of critical inquiry (see also Elisabeth Grosz (1995: 249) who points out that it is not only the objects of sexual and gender inquiry but also the knowledge produced about them that can be queer). It is this ambivalence that lies at the heart of this presentation. On the one hand, I will propose to add a queer critical layer to one of the strands of socially engaged research with which I identify most, namely critical discourse studies. On the other hand, I will employ that very queer lens to critique and partly destabilize the critical punch of queer theory itself. This two-fold project will be realised through a re-reading of performativity theory with the help of data on gender and sexual discourses across a variety of contexts.
Most commonly associated with the work of the American philosopher Judith Butler on gender, sexuality and the sexed body (1990, 1993, 2004, 2011), performativity theory’s focus on the body brings with it the promise of broadening the remit of inquiry beyond a narrow focus on language so as to encompass “aspects of experience and reality that do no present themselves in propositional or even in verbal form” (Sedgwick 2003: 6), such as affect and materiality (see also Bucholtz and Hall, in press, Peck and Stroud 2015). Against this backdrop, I will argue that it is in the mapping of the social life of “affect” (Ahmed 2004), and how it manifests semiotically, that there is the promise of understanding – and maybe changing – social structures and practices. Such a move, in turn, has important implications for a discipline like critical discourse studies that is largely underpinned by a Habermasian idea of a rational subject/speaker (see Habermas 1984).
A re-reading of performativity will also allow me to perform an act of critique against queer theory’s normative normativity. Whilst promiscuous sexual liaisons are considered by queer scholars anti-normative and queer acts of resistance, all weddings – both hetero and homo – are seen as the pinnacle of normative normality. Using examples from current debates on same-sex unions, I will argue that to discard a priori the performativity of same-sex wedding as an ‘unqueer’ gesture is to pay selective attention to the nuances of iterable performances, which, as Butler reminds us, if they “are not immediately or obviously subversive, it may be that it is rather in the reformulation of kinship […] that the appropriation and redeployment of the categories of dominant culture enable the formation of kinship relations that function quite supportively as oppositional discourse” (Butler 1993: 24–241). I’m not saying that we should all work for the marriage factory, but I will end the talk by cautioning against some hegemonic tendencies in queer readings of performativity theory, which reveal an underlying anti-normative mantra of queer studies.
Alan Partington
Università di Bologna
alanscott.partington@unibo.it
In common with other types of discourse analysis, the general aim of CADS is ‘[...] to acquaint ourselves as much as possible with the discourse type(s) in hand’ (Partington, Duguid & Taylor 2013: 12), to discover by inference how discourse participants typically behave, how they typically interact and what their typical discourse aims are. But it is also interested in particular events which may stand out from this backdrop of typicality and to understand why they occurred. But what can corpus assistance achieve that other approaches to discourse studies struggle to? After all, they are also in the business of uncovering ‘non-obvious’ meaning. By means of various case studies, I want to illustrate the added values of CADS to discourse study. It can supply an overview of large numbers of texts, and by shunting between statistical analyses, close reading and analysis types half-way between the two, CADS is able to look at language at different levels of abstraction. After all, ‘you cannot understand the world just by looking at it’ (Stubbs 1996: 92), and abstract representations of it need to be built and then tested. Indeed, far from being unable to take context into account (the most common accusation levelled at Corpus Linguistics), CADS contextualises, decontextualises and recontextualises language performance in a variety of ways according to research aims. It also highlights how statistical information, sometimes dismissed as ‘merely’ quantitative, is actually inherently also qualitative in nature. Corpus techniques greatly facilitate comparison among datasets and therefore among discourse types. They can, moreover, ensure analytical transparency and replicability (and para-replicability). And because parts of the analysis are conducted by the machine, they enable the human analyst to step outside the hermeneutic circle, to place some distance between the interpreter and the interpretation. Finally, they enable the researcher to test the validity of their observations, for instance, by searching for counterexamples (‘positive cherry-picking’).
Having said all this, the discourse analytical process is always guided by the analyst, and there are many parts of the process which a machine simply cannot tackle. This is why we prefer the term corpus-assisted to alternatives such as corpus-driven or corpus-based.
The jury is still out on the degree to which CADS and CDA are compatible. Much CADS work is purely linguistic and even when doing political linguistics, the emphasis is on linguistic analysis and not on doing politics. Linguistic research is a noble enough project in itself without necessarily being a tool for political change. Its methodological approach is inductive, bottom-up and observation-driven. Whilst it would be naïve to believe it possible to do political linguistics without some model of social interaction (I prefer this to the grander wording ‘social theory’), modern societies are constantly in flux and only by testing the way models operate can you achieve an accurate description of their behaviour and follow how they evolve. And should the inductively-derived observations clash with the model, it is the latter which has to adjust. This, of course, is exactly how scientific knowledge advances; inductive data-gathering and/or hypothesis testing leads to
Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Stubbs, M. 1996. Text and Corpus Analysis: Computer-assisted Studies of Language and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell.