Presentazione di propri lavori in scheda,

ITALIAN SURVEY

NATIONAL & INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO

edited by Paolo GiandebiaGGi and andrea Zerbi

This digital book has been edited by the association UID - Italian Union of Drawing, on the occasion

of the XXXVI International Conference of the Teachers in Representation (Parma, September

18-20, 2014). It collects the most significant survey experiences conducted by the Italian university

researchers, both nationally and abroad. It is meant to enhance and disclose the Italian know-how

in the world.

UID Scientific Committee

Vito Cardone, Università degli Studi di Salerno - President Mario Centofanti, Università degli Studi dell’Aquila - Vice President Mario Docci, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Piero Albisinni, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Fabrizio Apollonio, Università degli Studi di Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum Paolo Belardi, Università degli Studi di Perugia

Marco Bini, Università degli Studi di Firenze

Francesco Cervellini, Università degli Studi di Camerino Emanuela Chiavoni, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Michela Cigola, Università degli Studi di Cassino e del Lazio meridionale Antonio Conte, Università degli Studi della Basilicata

Cesare Cundari, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza Antonella Di Luggo, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Francesca Fatta, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria Marco Gaiani, Università degli Studi di Bologna Alma Mater Studiorum Paolo Giandebiaggi, Università degli Studi di Parma

Massimo Giovannini, Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria Riccardo Migliari, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

Giuseppa Novello Massai, Politecnico di Torino

Arturo Livio Sacchi, Università degli Studi di Chieti-Pescara G. D’Annunzio Ornella Zerlenga, Seconda Università degli Studi di Napoli

Scientific and editorial board of the book and CD

Andrea Zerbi - Responsible

Maria Melley, Michela Rossi, Chiara Vernizzi - Collaborators Giorgia Bianchi, Donatella Bontempi - Collaborators and Graphic design

© Copyright

UID – UNIONE ITALIANA DISEGNO

English texts are provided by the single authors.

Copyright © MMXIV ARACNE editrice int.le S.r.l. www.aracneeditrice.it info@aracneeditrice.it via Quarto Negroni, 15 00040 Ariccia (RM) (06) 93781065

isbn 978-88-548-7508-1

All rights reserved I edition - September 2014

P

reface

,

Vito Cardone

pag. 7

S

urvey

:

analytical

knowledge

of

the

architecture

,

Paolo Giandebiaggi

pag. 9

n

ational

P

ortfolio

pag. 11

100 n

ational

S

urvey

e

xPerienceS

- r

egionS

_{pag. 12}

100 n

ational

S

urvey

e

xPerienceS

- B

oardS

pag. 14

i

nternational

P

ortfolio

pag. 117

100 i

nternational

S

urvey

e

xPerienceS

- c

ountrieS

pag. 118

100 i

nternational

S

urvey

e

xPerienceS

- B

oardS

pag. 120

t

hematic

indiceS

pag. 223

P

articiPating

u

niverSitieS

pag. 224

P

articiPating

d

ePartmentS

pag. 226

r

eSPonSiBleS

of

S

urveyS

- uid m

emBerS

pag. 228

P

artnerS

pag. 232

5

i

ndex

The Survey, in all its forms - architectural, archaeological, urban, environmental - is a specific

topic of the Italian university professors and researchers of graphic representation, which

practice it since the corresponding scientific community has been established.

Reading the boards of this Portfolio provides a significant overview of this task, which has

taken shape as the center of the relationship with business communities and government

agencies and, increasingly, as one of the keys to establish relationships and work with

non-academic foreign realities. At the end of the array, the pride is legitimate, considering how the

matter evolved.

The first surveys focused on individual monuments, in the wake of the practice introduced

and ennobled in the course of half a millennium from all generations of architectural travelers

in Italy, who made this the best method to study the built heritage. The surveys of entire city

centers and parts of the town were initiated in the sixties of the last century, while the urban

survey was developed in the next decade. This was followed by the study of the urban fabric,

of the housing, of the extra-urban landscape contexts, launched at the end of the century.

Finally, today the themes analyzed are phenomena, functions, intangible characteristics of the

territory and the environment.

Also driven by the spread of the so-called industrial archeology, which more generally can

be defined “functional” archeology, singular buildings and specific categories of uses are

presented: lighthouses, towers, castles and fortified cities, royal palaces, monasteries,

hermit and cave architecture, theaters and amphitheaters... About some of these topics were

organized - sometimes even today - periodic meetings for study and research.

From Italy, we moved all over the world, first of all in the nearest places, such as the

Mediterranean basin, then covering almost all continents: Europe, America, the Near East and

Far East to China, until equatorial Africa, bringing the respect for the historic heritage. First

engaged in the survey of realities to which we were used (amphitheatres, baths, fortresses,

monasteries), then of those distant from our culture, such as mosques, medinas, souks,

troglodyte architectures, the estancias jesuiticas, traditional urban contexts. Mythical places

that show absolute architectural, urban and environmental value.

The limited space available to me suggests to avoid citations. It is better, because it was, and is,

7

P

, Vito Cardone

a collective adventure of the entire scientific community, which, about the different themes, saw

in the forefront now one and now another of the various university departments. All pledged to

match the traditional and still indispensable direct and “sight” survey, with freehand sketches,

to the most innovative and sophisticated technologies, to define the relevant procedures, to

develop and optimize the appropriate methodologies and specific protocols. The aim is the

critical reading and knowledge of the studied subject.

In fifty years, a specific expertise has been configured, unique in the world, based on a wealth

of specialistic knowledge and skills of the highest level. It is one of the true excellences of the

Italian university system and of the entire country, and it was born experimentally working in

the field. Thus, Italy has now dozens of highly qualified experts, spin-offs are born, technology

transfer centers operate in Italy through relationships with businesses and Italian and foreign

governments. All this, also recalls and forms intellectual workers from other countries.

In short, this is one of the several unrecognized small miracles of the “made in Italy”. A little

curious and unusual case, compared to the tradition and what many believe the Italian vocation

and specificity. It does not produce stylish fashion items or food delicacies, but technological

innovation for the knowledge and the enhancement of the cultural heritage.

Vito Cardone

UID President

8

Vito Cardone

UID President

, Vito Cardone

S

URVEY

:

ANALYTICAL

KNOWLEDGE

OF

THE

ARCHITECTURE

9

S

I

:

,

Paolo Giandebiaggi

It is hardly a coincidence that John Ruskin began his most popular book of aphorisms “The

Seven Lamps of Architecture” by writing that in architecture it is not hard to know what is

right to do, but the difficulty is to know what is possible. If you think about the thousand

implications that each architectural object contains in its slow and layered construction, in

its transformation over time for many different reasons (functional, engineering, structural,

aesthetic), you understand how difficult is to know which intervention is most appropriate in

order to repair and preserve it.

Any actions that you intend to program on an existing body (whether urban or architectural, be

it human, animal or plant), every aspect of its complex world must be thoroughly investigated

to envision the consequences that such an intervention, even if conducted on a single part,

may cause in the whole or in other individual parts.

Despite the best purpose, for years the actions, even on historic buildings, used modalities,

technologies and materials that only later showed their incongruity and inadequacy. The

immense and illusory faith in the modernity of the individual specialist interventions, the more

and more specific skills and the more localized operations sometimes caused more damage

than they were intended to remedy, because the organism as a whole had not been looked

at.

As happened in Medicine, so also in Architecture, the key role was understood of the in-depth

analysis of the preliminary framework for intervention. This consists of the critical reconstruction

and of the processes of realization and trasformation of the building over time, and of the

more and more refined measurements and non-destructive analytical methods (thermography,

ultrasound, micro-gravimetry, etc..) that primarily allow you to reach a diagnosis. If conducted

in a mono-disciplinary way on the history, structure, surface degradation, shape, size, etc..,

this one often betrays itself. The need to bring all these specialized analysis, to an unified and

shared reading, seems to be the only path that can decrease the risk of a wrong action.

This is the Survey of architecture in its most recent meaning: the synchronic and homogeneous

reading of all the aspects that can be directly and indirectly acquired on the existing system. Their

correlation and finalization to an overall assessment about its identity, its characteristics from

the origin to the present day, its state of preservation and its possibilities of development.

10

S

:

,

Paolo Giandebiaggi

Starting from the metric and formal detection, as first data of consistency of the architectural

asset, we reconstruct the thread of his story through the layering of the interventions since

founding until today. Further analysis must be related to one another and with the measured

shapes, to enrich the knowledge of the architecture: the ideational and project reasons of

the various interventions are recovered starting from the original one, the results are judged

and the acceptance of the coeval cultural situation is confirmed or denied. Other elements to

be recorded are the building technologies, the materials and their chemical components, the

analysis of laying ground, the shape of the underground elements, the ability of the elements

to withstand the stresses, the state of preservation, the cracking, the technological existing

systems and their conservation and efficiency, their integration with the building, etc.

Each specific survey, each synchronic and homogeneous reading, each finalized critical

analysis, they must be seen in its unity that composes a real medical file of the building, of

which the morphological aspects are the first step, probably the most important, without which

any interpretation becomes superficial and temporary. Of course this involves an experience

and analytical skills that are often based on the history of the surveyor, the architect I would

say, the one who saw on the field, he learned, he compared, he understood.

The complexity of Italian architecture, with particular reference to the historical one, in terms

of preservation and recovery, allowed such and so many experiences that enable the Italian

specialist, through his schools of origin, to address the problem of the analytic and in depth

knowledge of the architecture as a whole. The notoriety of this competence makes that every

year many of us are called to work in various parts of the world, even in not well known contexts,

in both cultural and technical sense. On the other hand, the interlocutors remain astonished

and admired of how quickly the researchers are able not only to delve into the issues, but also

of how the acquired methods perfectly meet any type of architecture and context, becoming

themselves the subject of study. In fact, the sharp and aware method of comparing each

element makes the Italian experiences an exportable model esteemed in the world.

This regesto, called Portfolio, actually want to document the complexity of the Italian

experience, first in the native country and then in the international arena. This, to see and not

just to talk about how to work in this field, which is the level of experience gained and what are

the prospects, in a world that looks with increasing interest at the conservation and reuse of

the already constructed, as memory of its identity.

Paolo Giandebiaggi

Scientific Director

10

Paolo Giandebiaggi

Starting from the metric and formal detection, as first data of consistency of the architectural

asset, we reconstruct the thread of his story through the layering of the interventions since

founding until today. Further analysis must be related to one another and with the measured

shapes, to enrich the knowledge of the architecture: the ideational and project reasons of

the various interventions are recovered starting from the original one, the results are judged

and the acceptance of the coeval cultural situation is confirmed or denied. Other elements to

be recorded are the building technologies, the materials and their chemical components, the

analysis of laying ground, the shape of the underground elements, the ability of the elements

to withstand the stresses, the state of preservation, the cracking, the technological existing

systems and their conservation and efficiency, their integration with the building, etc.

Each specific survey, each synchronic and homogeneous reading, each finalized critical

analysis, they must be seen in its unity that composes a real medical file of the building, of

which the morphological aspects are the first step, probably the most important, without which

any interpretation becomes superficial and temporary. Of course this involves an experience

and analytical skills that are often based on the history of the surveyor, the architect I would

say, the one who saw on the field, he learned, he compared, he understood.

The complexity of Italian architecture, with particular reference to the historical one, in terms

of preservation and recovery, allowed such and so many experiences that enable the Italian

specialist, through his schools of origin, to address the problem of the analytic and in depth

knowledge of the architecture as a whole. The notoriety of this competence makes that every

year many of us are called to work in various parts of the world, even in not well known contexts,

in both cultural and technical sense. On the other hand, the interlocutors remain astonished

and admired of how quickly the researchers are able not only to delve into the issues, but also

of how the acquired methods perfectly meet any type of architecture and context, becoming

themselves the subject of study. In fact, the sharp and aware method of comparing each

element makes the Italian experiences an exportable model esteemed in the world.

This regesto, called Portfolio, actually want to document the complexity of the Italian

experience, first in the native country and then in the international arena. This, to see and not

just to talk about how to work in this field, which is the level of experience gained and what are

the prospects, in a world that looks with increasing interest at the conservation and reuse of

the already constructed, as memory of its identity.

Paolo Giandebiaggi

Scientific Director

11

100 N

ATIONAL

S

URVEY

E

XPERIENCES

- R

EGIONS

P

IEMONTE

L

OMBARDIA

T

RENTINO

A

LTO

A

DIGE

V

ENETO

F

RIULI

- V

ENEZIA

G

IULIA

L

IGURIA

E

MILIA

R

OMAGNA

T

OSCANA

U

MBRIA

M

ARCHE

L

AZIO

A

BRUZZO

M

OLISE

C

AMPANIA

P

UGLIA

B

ASILICATA

C

ALABRIA

S

ARDEGNA

S

ICILIA

100 N

S

E

- B

I

TALY

N.1

P

- T

- H

N.2

P

- T

- S

G

D

N.3

P

- T

- S

N.4

L

- B

- SS. B

S

C

N.5

L

- B

- T

C

N.6

L

- M

- T

P

P

N.7

L

- M

- R

B

N.8

L

- M

- S

M

S

S

,

N.9

L

- P

- T

N.10

T

A

- A

V

N

(

) - M

C

N.11

V

- P

- T

E

’

C

N.12

F

- V

G

- G

- T

T

D

N.13

L

- G

- S

M

C

N.14

L

- G

- V

C

N.15

L

- G

- P

V

N.16

L

- P

C

T

, M

(

) - L

N.17

E

R

- C

(

) - P

A

N.18

E

R

- F

- T

C

T

N.19

E

R

- M

- G

T

N.20

E

R

- P

- T

B

14

100 N

ATIONAL

S

URVEY

E

XPERIENCES

- B

OARDS

14

15

N.21

E

R

- R

, M

, F

, F

- L

B

A

’

N.22

T

- B

V

(

) - T

B

V

N.23

T

- C

P

(

) - H

N.24

T

- F

- D

UNESCO H

H

C

N.25

T

- F

- M

’

N.26

T

- F

- T

S

M

F

C

N.27

T

- L

- R

N.28

T

- M

T

(

) - “I

T

” B

N.29

T

- M

(

) - M

C

A

M

N.30

T

- P

- N

’

N.31

T

- P

- T

C

N.32

T

- P

(

) - P

:

E

N

N.33

T

- S

F

(

- T

G

D

N.34

T

- S

P

(

) - S

N.35

T

- T

(

) - S

O

T

N.36

T

- V

(

) - M

S

S

N.37

T

- V

(

) - T

: V

D

’ S

V

B

N.38

U

- G

(

) - T

“C

”

N.39

U

- M

M

(

)

A

(

) - T

V

F

M

’

M

N.40

U

- P

- T

E

C

N.41

U

- T

- T

C

N.42

M

- A

P

- A H

/D

A

U

L

N.43

M

- F

(

) - V

F

F

T

N.44

M

- U

(

) - T

D

P

:

N.45

M

- U

(

) - T

U

M

N.46

M

- A H

/D

A

A

/N

L

N.47

L

- F

(

) - S

M

N.48

L

- G

(

) - T

A

C

N.49

L

- G

M

(

) - C

B

N.50

L

- R

- A

F

N.51

L

- R

- C

S

’A

N.52

L

- R

- C

M

N.53

L

- R

- R

M

N.54

L

- R

- S

C

Q

F

N.55

L

- R

- T

C

S

P

F

M

C

N.56

L

- R

- T

S

P

B

N.57

L

- R

- T

V

D

S

P

B

N.58

L

- T

(

- V

A

N.59

L

- V

(

) - P

P

N.60

L

- V

(

) - C

A

N.61

A

- A

(

) - T

“R

P

2013”

N.62

A

- L’A

- B

A

M

16

100 N

S

E

- B

N.63

A

- L’A

- S

B

M

N.64

A

- L’A

- S

C

’A

C

N.65

M

- R

(

) - D

C

S

C

N.66

M

- S

V

V

(

) - T

N.67

M

- V

(

) - T

V

N.68

C

- C

- T

R

P

N.69

C

- E

(

) - V

P

,

N.70

C

- N

- P

M

M

C

N.71

C

- N

- T

M

N.72

C

- P

(

) - T

N.73

C

- P

(

) - H

N

’A

V

M

N.74

C

- P

(

) - O

N.75

C

- P

(

) - T

N.76

P

- B

- P

F

N.77

P

- B

- P

C

:

A

F

M

N.78

P

- G

P

(

) - C

S

S

M

N.79

P

- P

(

) - S

S

P

C

N.80

P

- T

(

) - P

C

:

F

II F

N.81

P

- V

’I

- T

N.82

B

- M

- T

P

N.83

C

- C

C

(

) - F

F

S

M

N.84

C

- R

C

- E

M

I

M

N.85

S

- A

(

) - S

N.86

S

- C

(

) - T

:

T

,

G

XX S

N.87

S

- V

(

) - T

L

N.88

S

- T

L

A

D

I

A

F

D

N.89

S

- V

H

S

N.90

S

- A

(

) - A

C

N.91

S

- A

O

(

) - T

S

G

L

G

N.92

S

- C

(

) - R

N

N.93

S

- C

E

(

) - E

’

R

:

N.94

S

- M

- I

S

T

N.95

S

- M

- O

N.96

S

- P

V

(

) - S. A

A

C

N.97

S

- S

- P

O

M

N.98

S

- S

- P

D

N.99

S

- S

, E

(

) - T

R

A

I

N.100

T

A

I

L

20

14

20

14

_UID

PA R M A

20

14

N AT I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E

XXXVI CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE DEI DOCENTI DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE - XI CONGRESSO UNIONE ITALIANA DEL DISEGNO ITALIAN SURVEY & INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

PARTICIPANTS: M. Balzani, S. Bertocci, P.Puma, F. Ferrari, N. Santopuoli, M. Fabbri, G. Galvani, A. Grieco, S. Settimo,

C.Traina, F.Uccelli, N. Zaltron, F.Viroli, P. Allodoli, L. Cosimi, L. Bianchini, T. Brogini, F. Concas, M. Cornieti, G. Garziano,

M. Masci, G. Pancani, M. M. Simari, L. Verdiani, C. Paolini, F.Arduini, S.Magrini, C. Santi, A. R. Fantoni, D. Giuliani

GRAPHIC COMPOSITION BY Federico Ferrari, Federica Maietti

RESPONSIBLE: Marcello Balzani, Stefano Bertocci, Paola Puma

The Michelangelo research project basically consists on the 3D modelling of Michelangelo’s architectural heritage placed in Florence. It is aimed

at the updating of the existing documentation and the enhancement of Michelangelo’s work. The project started in 2003. The dissemination

of results of the Michelangelo project is focused on different levels, mainly based on targeted and selected contents. So far, all elaborated

databases allow a critical and potentially web-based inquiry of their architectural content.

N.25

I

TALY

- T

OSCANA

- F

IRENZE

M

ICHELANGELO

’

S

ARCHITECTURES

UID

PA R M A

20

14

N AT I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E

XXXVI CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE DEI DOCENTI DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE - XI CONGRESSO UNIONE ITALIANA DEL DISEGNO ITALIAN SURVEY & INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

PARTICIPANTS: Andrea Camilli, Giovanni Pancani, Lorenzo Cantini, Federico Paoli, Giulio Innocenti Degli, Francesco Tioli;

5 groups, 17 students of the University of Florence

GRAPHIC COMPOSITION BY Paola Puma

RESPONSIBLE: Paola Puma

Emerging only monument of the Roman city of Pisa, the Baths of Nero are located within the medieval walls, near the Piazza dei Miracoli. The

artifact (end of I century A.D.) was discovered only in 1548 revealing a cubical building in an octagonal room domed. After a long succession

of problematic restorations and abandonment we participated in the project to re-discover the monument in order to facilitate and improve its

conservation and the correct touristic visit of the area by our knowledge/surveys/3D visualization system.

N.30

I

TALY

- T

OSCANA

- P

ISA

N

ERO

’

S

THERMAL

BATHS

DIDA - U

S

F

20

14

20

14

_UID

PA R M A

20

14

N AT I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E

XXXVI CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE DEI DOCENTI DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE - XI CONGRESSO UNIONE ITALIANA DEL DISEGNO ITALIAN SURVEY & INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

PARTICIPANTS: M. Balzani, F. Uccelli, F. Ferrari, A. Grieco, G. Galvani, C. Traina, S. Settimo, M. Fabbri, F. Pacini,

G. Bentivoglio, G. De Felice, G. Maria, C. Baracchini, M. Ciafaloni, R. Scopigno, C.Montani, P. Cignoni,

M. Callieri, M. Dellepiane, V. Fiorin, F. Ganovelli, F. Ponchio, M. Bini, S. Bertocci,

G. Pancani, B. Kacyra

GRAPHIC COMPOSITION BY Federico Ferrari, Federica Maietti

RESPONSIBLE: Marcello Balzani, Marco Bini, Roberto Scopigno

The project aimed to test the time-of-

ight laser scanner technology to achieve a 3D model of the exterior of the Cathedral of Pisa developing a

link with the information systems relating to the historical and restoration works documentation. The survey therefore is the essential basis of a

dynamic database to enter the historical-cultural and diagnostic information and in general on the current and past state of conservation of the

monument.

N.31

I

TALY

- T

OSCANA

- P

ISA

T

HE

C

ATHEDRAL

20

14

_UID

PA R M A

20

14

N AT I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E

XXXVI CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE DEI DOCENTI DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE - XI CONGRESSO UNIONE ITALIANA DEL DISEGNO ITALIAN SURVEY & INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

PARTICIPANTS: Stefano Bertocci, Graziella Del Duca, Gianluca Falaschi, Fabio Ferrara, Lorenzo Giacomini

GRAPHIC COMPOSITION BY Graziella Del Duca

RESPONSIBLE: Stefano Bertocci

The work made on the vault of villa Ginori, in the hall called “Vincenzo Meucci”, represents the preliminary research on the reliability of the survey

made on image-based data compared with laser scanner survey. The result showed a high correlation between the two matrices and thus it

allowed the realization of the orthophoto of the ceiling and the wireframe drawing.

N.33

I

TALY

- T

OSCANA

- S

ESTO

F

IORENTINO

(FI)

T

HE

G

INORI

VAULT

IN

D

OCCIA

UID

PA R M A

20

14

N AT I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E

XXXVI CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE DEI DOCENTI DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE - XI CONGRESSO UNIONE ITALIANA DEL DISEGNO ITALIAN SURVEY & INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

PARTICIPANTS: Alessandro Merlo, Giorgio Verdiani, Gaia Lavoratti, Elisa Bechelli, Giovanni Benvenuti,

Elisabetta Del Grande, Cinzia Jelencovich, Giulia Galeotti, Erica Ganghereti, Francesca Grillotti,

Francesco Tioli, Alessandro Peruzzi, Federico Andreazzoli, Antonino Meo, Ilaria Agostini, Sara D’Amico,

Duccio Troiano, Massimo Zucconi, Massimo Gasperini, Emanuele Pellegrini, Serena di Grazia

GRAPHIC COMPOSITION BY Alessandro Merlo

RESPONSIBLE: Alessandro Merlo, Giorgio Verdiani

The Sorana project (2009-2011) provided the integrated survey of the entire settlement in a survey campaign

ve days lasting. The research

has been conducted with the aim of enforcing the integration between the various scienti

c ambits involved in the project (history, archeology,

architecture, geology, iconology) and making available the results of the studies in editable format. The results provide an essential basis to

promote actions of preservation and enhancement of existing heritage.

N.34

I

TALY

- T

OSCANA

- S

ORANA

DI

P

ESCIA

(PT)

S

URVEY

AND

DOCUMENTATION

OF

THE

SETTLEMENT

DIDA - U

S

F

20

14

20

14



UID

PA R M A

20

14

N AT I O N A L E X P E R I E N C E

XXXVI CONVEGNO INTERNAZIONALE DEI DOCENTI DELLA RAPPRESENTAZIONE - XI CONGRESSO UNIONE ITALIANA DEL DISEGNO ITALIAN SURVEY & INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE

PARTICIPANTS: M. Balzani, N. Santopuoli, F. Ferrari, F. Uccelli, A. Grieco, N. Zaltron, B. Marco, S. Settimo, N. Brigo,

A. Papi, G. Galvani, M. Crisci, M. Sorrentino, C. Martuzzi, P.G. Guzzo, A. d’Ambrosio, A. Varone, M. Bini,

G. Pancani, F. Tioli, L. Seccia, B. Kacyra, G. Boselli, D. Scagliarini Corlàita, S. Santoro Bianchi,

A. Coralini, R.Scopigno C.Montani, M. Callieri

GRAPHIC COMPOSITION BY Federico Ferrari, Federica Maietti

RESPONSIBLE: Marcello Balzani, Nicola Santopuoli

The project started in 1998 developed the 3D survey of: the Forum, home of the Chaste Lovers, House of the Centenary, home of the Pig, home

of Paquius Proculus, House of Julia Felix, the graf

ti on the Lupanare, the thermopolium of Asellina and the facades on Via dell’Abbondanza.

Digital databases allow the query and the integrated upgrading of all the collected data, the starting point for the enhancement and conservative

management of the site. This is the meaning of the tender notice announced in 2014 by the Pompeii Archaeological Department.

N.75

I

TALY

- C

AMPANIA

- P

OMPEI

(NA)

T

HE

ARCHAEOLOGICAL

SITE

20

14

117

AFRICA

A

LGERIA

E

GYPT

E

THIOPIA

L

YBIA

M

OROCCO

T

OGO

T

UNISIA

AMERICA

A

RGENTINA

B

RAZIL

C

OLOMBIA

C

UBA

E

L

S

ALVADOR

G

UATEMALA

M

EXICO

P

ANAMA

P

ERU

USA

EUROPE

A

LBANIA

C

ROATIA

F

RANCE

G

REECE

M

ALTA

M

OLDOVA

M

ONTENEGRO

R

USSIA

S

PAIN

U

KRAINE

ASIA

C

HINA

G

EORGIA

I

NDIA

I

RAN

I

RAQ

I

SRAEL

J

ORDAN

L

EBANON

S

AUDI

A

RABIA

S

YRIA

T

URKEY

V

IETNAM

120

E

UROPE

I.1

A

- B

- T

T

F

I.2

A

- D

- T

A

I.3

A

- E

- “S

M

” O

C

I.4

A

- S

- T

I.5

A

- H

A

I.6

C

- D

- T

L

R

B

I.7

F

- L

- H

I.8

F

- P

- T

P

I.9

G

- A

- T

T

W

I.10

M

- R

- S

. P

C

I.11

M

- G

- T

C

I.12

M

- T

M

T

I.13

M

- C

- B

A

M

D

I.14

M

- S

B

- T

C

: T

D

P

S. C

C

I.15

R

- I

- T

N

J

C

I.16

R

- K

- T

I.17

R

- K

I

(R

K

) - T

P

C

I.18

R

- P

- T

I.19

R

- P

(M

) - T

C

M

O

L

S

I.20

R

- P

(S

. P

) - T

C

P

(E

)

I.21

R

- R

K

- T

W

A

L

I.22

R

- S

- T

I.23

S

- B

(V

) - T

F

B

G

B

A

I.24

S

- C

L

- M

I.25

S

- C

- T

G

M

100 I

NTERNATIONAL

S

URVEY

E

XPERIENCES

- B

OARDS

100 I

S

E

- B

120

121

100 I

S

E

- B

I.26

S

- M

- T

“

”

M

A

I.27

S

- M

- T

I.28

S

- P

(C

) - T

I.29

S

- S

(B

) - S

M

R

C

I.30

S

- Z

- S

P

N

C

I.31

U

- O

- T

A

SIA

I.32

C

- G

(G

) - G

I.33

C

- G

(G

) - T

L

F

I.34

C

- Z

(G

) - T

H

D

I.35

G

- T

- T

O

T

I.36

G

- U

S

- S

I.37

I

- A

(R

) - T

S

M

I.38

I

- B

(R

) - H

I.39

I

- B

(R

) - T

G

P

I.40

I

- K

(E

) - T

T

-A

-

-D

I.41

I

- N

-

-R

(F

) - P

K

T

I.42

I

- P

(F

) - C

G

T

I.43

I

- T

- O

A

:

I.44

I

- D

(K

) - J

A

I.45

I

- A

- T

O

C

I.46

I

- M

(D

S

R

) - T

I.47

I

- M

(G

) - A

I.48

J

- J

- T

I.49

J

- J

- Z

T

I.50

J

- P

- A

I.51

J

- P

- T

I.52

J

- S

, A

-K

P

- T

C

M

E

I.53

L

- B

- A

I.54

S

A

- J

- A

B

,

H

D

I.55

S

- D

- T

A

C

I.56

T

- G

- T

C

I.57

T

- I

- H

S

I.58

T

- K

T

A

(I

) - T

B

C

S

. A

I.59

V

- M

S

(D

N

) - T

A

FRICA

I.60

A

- C

(T

) - T

T

I.61

A

- C

- U

GIS

M

I.62

A

- D

(B

) - T

122

I.64

A

- T

- T

,

I.65

E

- C

- T

B

-B

G

-A

P

I.66

E

- R

- T

I.67

E

- S

- H

S

A

I.68

E

- A

A

- T

I

G

M

II

I.69

E

- D

D

- T

I

V

I.70

E

- M

- T

I

C

Y

IV

I.71

L

- L

M

S

- A

L

M

, S

C

I.72

M

- A

- P

M

M

I.73

M

- S

(O

) - K

, T

K

: T

S

I.74

M

- V

- A

C

A

V

I.75

M

- Z

, D

T

- K

K

V

H

A

I.76

T

- K

, S

, A

, K

, L

, A

- H

I.77

T

- C

(T

) - T

T

I.78

T

- M

(G

) - H

I.79

T

- O

- A

I.80

T

- T

- K

L

A

MERICA

I.81

A

- C

- I

C

J

I.82

A

- L

P

(B

A

) - I

C

C

I.83

B

- O

P

(M

G

) - T

3D

I.84

C

- B

- T

P

I.85

C

- H

- O

H

I.86

C

- H

- T

I.87

C

- S

C

- T

I.88

E

S

- I

(S

) - U

GIS

I.89

G

- C

(P

) - T

I.90

G

- L

B

(P

) - A

:

A

I.91

G

- S

A

(S

) - R

I.92

M

- M

C

- T

B

M

C

C

T

M

I.93

M

- V

- S

J

U

F

I.94

P

- C

- S

L

C

F

I.95

P

- P

- T

I.96

P

- C

(H

) - U

GIS

I.97

P

- H

(H

) - U

GIS

I.98

USA - N

Y

, C

, C

- D

C

OSU,

I.99

USA - S

J

(P

R

) - T

W

ORLD

W

IDE

W

EB

I.100

V

L

S

: W

, C

, M

100 I

S

E

- B

20