• Non ci sono risultati.

Do health systems cover the mouth? Comparing dental care coverage for older adults in eight jurisdictions

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Do health systems cover the mouth? Comparing dental care coverage for older adults in eight jurisdictions"

Copied!
10
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Health

Policy

jo u rn al h om ep a ge :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / h e a l t h p o l

Do

health

systems

cover

the

mouth?

Comparing

dental

care

coverage

for

older

adults

in

eight

jurisdictions

Sara

Allin

a,b,∗

,

Julie

Farmer

b,c

,

Carlos

Qui ˜

nonez

c

,

Allie

Peckham

b,d

,

Gregory

Marchildon

a,b

,

Dimitra

Panteli

e

,

Cornelia

Henschke

e,f

,

Giovanni

Fattore

g

,

Demetrio

Lamloum

g

,

Alexander

C.L.

Holden

h

,

Thomas

Rice

b,i

aInstituteofHealthPolicy,ManagementandEvaluation,UniversityofToronto,Canada

bNorthAmericanObservatoryonHealthSystemsandPolicies

cFacultyofDentistry,UniversityofToronto,Canada

dEdsonCollegeofNursingandHealthInnovation,ArizonaStateUniversity

eDepartmentofHealthCareManagement,TechnischeUniversitätBerlin,Germany

fFacultyofHealthSciencesBrandenburg,BrandenburgUniversityofTechnologyCottbus-Senftenberg,Germany

gDepartmentofSocialandPoliticalSciences,BocconiUniversity,Italy

hTheUniversityofSydneySchoolofDentistry,FacultyofMedicineandHealth,Australia

iFieldingSchoolofPublicHealth,DepartmentofHealthPolicyandManagement,UniversityofCalifornia,LosAngeles,UnitedStates

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received24February2020

Receivedinrevisedform17June2020

Accepted26June2020 Keywords: Healthsystems Dentalcare Olderadults Universalcoverage High-incomecountries

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Oralhealthisanimportantcomponentofgeneralhealth,yetthereislimitedfinancialprotectionforthe costsoforalhealthcareinmanycountries.Thisstudycomparespublicdentalcarecoverageinaselection ofjurisdictions:Australia(NewSouthWales),Canada(Alberta),England,France,Germany,Italy,Sweden, andtheUnitedStates.DrawingontheWHOUniversalCoverageCube,wecomparebreadth(whois covered),depth(shareoftotalcostscovered),andscope(servicescovered),withafocusonadultsaged 65andolder.Weworkedwithlocalexpertstopopulatetemplatestoprovidedetailedandcomparable descriptionsofdentalcarecoverageintheirjurisdictions.Overallmostjurisdictionsofferpublicdental coverageforbasicservices(exams,x-rays,simplefillings)withinfourgeneraltypesofcoveragemodels: 1)deeppubliccoverageforasubsetoftheolderadultpopulationbasedonstricteligibilitycriteria: Canada(Alberta),Australia(NewSouthWales)andItaly;2)universalbutshallowcoverageoftheolder adultpopulation:England,France,Sweden;3)universal,andpredominantlydeepcoverageforolder adults:Germany;and4)shallowcoverageavailableonlytosomesubgroupsofolderadultsintheUnited States.Duetothelimitedavailabilityofcomparabledatawithinandacrossjurisdictions,furtherresearch wouldbenefitfromstandardizeddatacollectioninitiativesfororalhealthmeasures.

©2020PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction

Oralhealthisanimportantcomponentofgeneralhealthand overallwell-being [1]. Untreatedand poorly managedoral dis-eases,such as toothdecay and periodontal (gum)disease, can impactnutritionalintakeandincreasebacterialevelsand inflam-mation;thesefactors playa role in systemicinflammation and

夽 OpenAccessforthisarticleismadepossiblebyacollaborationbetweenHealth

PolicyandTheEuropeanObservatoryonHealthSystemsandPolicies.

∗ Correspondingauthorat:InstituteofHealthPolicyManagementand

Evalua-tion,UniversityofToronto,155CollegeStreet,suite425,Toronto,Ontario,M5T1P8,

Canada.

E-mailaddress:sara.allin@utoronto.ca(S.Allin).

overallhealthoutcomes[2].Toothdecayandgumdiseasecanlead topainandinfection,whichcannegativelyimpactanindividual’s qualityoflife[1].Theseconditionsarelargelypreventablethrough populationandindividualhealthpromotionstrategies,including communitywaterfluoridation,andregularoralhygiene.Further, routineaccesstoprimaryoralhealthcareenablesearlydetection andmanagementoforaldiseases,andcanmitigatethenegative impactsofpoororalhealthonindividualsandfamilies,and poten-tiallyavoidablecoststothehealthcaresystemandsociety[3,4].

Financial protection against the cost of dental care services varies widelyacrossand within high-incomecountries. Among 11high-incomecountries,theUnitedStatesandCanadahadthe highestpercentagesofthepopulationthatreportskippingdental careoradentalcheck-upbecauseofcostaccordingtothe2016 CommonwealthFundInternationalHealthPolicySurvey,with

sig-https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.015

(2)

nificantdisparities by income. Anestimated 45% of Americans withlower-than-medianincomeand40%ofCanadianswith lower-than-medianincomereportedskippingdentalcareduetocosts, comparedto21%ofhigherincomeAmericansand17%ofhigher incomeCanadians[5].CostbarriersalsoexistinFranceandSweden, wherenearlyonequarterofrespondentsreportedskippingdental careduetocosts[5].InEurope,costbarrierstodentalcareforadults andolderadultsappeartobemorepronouncedinItaly,France, andSwedencomparedtoGermanyandtheUnitedKingdom[6,7]. AlthoughcostbarriersmaybelowerintheUnitedKingdomthan inothercountriesonaverage,significantgeographicand socioe-conomicinequalitiesinbothaccesstodentalcareandoralhealth outcomesarestillpresent[8].Thus,itisnotsurprisingthatthere hasbeeninternationalinterestinstrengtheningdentalcare cov-erage programs aimedto bettermeet theoral health needsof populations[9–12].Currently,mosthigh-incomecountriesprovide someformofdentalcarecoverageforchildrenandyouth,with vari-ationintheextentofcoverageavailabletoadultandolderadult populations[13].

Thereareatleasttworeasonstofocusondentalcarecoverage forolderadults.First,peoplearelivinglongerwhilealso retain-ingmostoftheirownteeth.Thistrendincreasesthelifetimeriskof toothdecayandgumdisease,whichareassociatedwithother exist-ingchronicconditions[3].Forexample,poororalhealthismore prevalentinpatientswithdiabeticcomplications(e.g.,neuropathy) comparedtothosewithout[14].Also,poororalhealthamongolder peoplecanaffecttheirabilitytochewandeat,whichcanworsen theiroverallnutritionalintake[15].Second,insomecountriessuch asAustralia,Canada,andtheUnitedStates,theworking-age pop-ulationreliesheavilyonprivateinsurancetohelpcoverthecosts ofdentalcare,withdentalcoveragestronglytiedto employment-baseddentalinsurance.IntheUnitedStates,forexample,lossof dentalcoverageamongolderadultshasbeenassociatedwithno longerseekingdentalcareservices[16].

Theroleofpubliccoverageinprotectingagainstthecostsof dentalcareservicesforolderadultsaged65yearsandolderisnot wellknown.Whileinternationalcomparisonsondentalcare out-comesandinequalitieshavebeenconductedforadultsandolder adults[6,17–20],therehasbeenminimalattempttousethe char-acteristicsofpublicdentalcarecoverageasbasisforcomparison [21,22].Further,therehasbeennostudytoourknowledgethat hasdescribedthemodelsofdentalcarecoverageforthisagegroup acrossarangeofhigh-incomecountries.Thispaperaimstoprovide adescriptionandmappingofpublicdentalcarecoveragemodels inarangeofcomparablejurisdictionswithafocusonolderadults (individuals65yearsandolder).

2. Methods

2.1. Conceptualframework

Todescribeandcomparepublicdentalcarecoveragemodels forcommunity-dwelling(non-institutionalized)adultsaged65and olderacrossjurisdictions,coveragemodelsweredescribed accord-ingtothethreecorefeaturesoftheWHOCoverageCubeframework (Fig.1);theseinclude:(i)breadth-olderadultpopulations(≥65 yearsold)eligibleforpubliclyfunded dentalcareprograms; (ii) depth-theshareofthetotalcoststhatarebornebythe govern-ment/publicpayer;and(iii)scope-therangeofservicescovered underpubliclyfundeddentalcareprograms.Withinthecoverage cubeframework,thegapsoutsidethebreadth,depth,andscope ofpublicdentalcarecoveragemaybecoveredinpartwithprivate (mostlyvoluntary)dentalinsurance,andtheremainderwouldbe fromoutofpocketpayments(includingbothdirectpaymentsfor servicesnotincludedinanypubliccoveragemodel,andcost

shar-ingforservicesthatarenotfullypubliclyfunded).Duetoextensive variationintheroleofprivatedentalinsuranceplansacross juris-dictions,wedonotrevieworcomparemodelsofprivateinsurance coverageinthispaper.

2.2. Jurisdictionsandtargetpopulation

Weselectedeightcountriestocomparepublicdentalcare cov-eragemodelsforcommunity-dwellingolderadults(≥65yearsold): Australia,Canada,England,France,Germany,Italy,Sweden,andthe UnitedStates.Ourselectionconsidered(i)high-incomecountries thataremembersoftheOECDthatarefrequentlycomparedand includedininternationaldatasourcesandsurveys;and(ii) varia-tioninhealthsystemfundingandorganizationalmodels[23].(See SupplementalTable1forsomecomparativedataonhealthsystem anddentalcarespendingandutilization).InFrance,areformto dentalcarethatisintheearlystagesofimplementationwillreduce out-of-pocketpaymentsforseveraldentalcareservices[24];the datacollectedforthisstudyreflectthesituationasofJune2020. In three of thecountriesin our study– Canada,Australia, and UnitedStates–wefocus ononesub-nationaljurisdictiongiven health and dental coverage varieswidely across provincesand states.In Canada,publicly fundeddentalprogramsand services areorganizedattheprovincial/territoriallevel;theyarelargely designedtofillinthegapsnotcoveredthroughemployment-based benefitplanswhichgenerallycoverbasicdentalservices.Alberta, Ontario(asofNovember2019),NewfoundlandandLabrador,and YukonTerritoryaretheonlyjurisdictionsinCanadawithpublicly fundeddentalprogramsspecificallytargetingolderadults[25,26]. WeselectedAlbertaforinclusioninthisstudyasithasthe longest-standingpublicdentalcareprogramforolderadultscomparedto otherprovincesandterritories[25].InAustralia,publicdentalcare receivesfundingfromboththestateandCommonwealth(federal) governments,andstateandterritorygovernmentsareatlibertyto takedifferentapproachestoprovidingpubliclyfundeddentalcare [10].Inthisstudy,weincludethemostpopulousstateinAustralia: NewSouthWales.Finally,intheUnitedStates,publicdentalcare coverageforsomeolderadultsisprovidedthroughbothfederal (Medicare)and/orstate(Medicaid)programs.We describe den-talcoverageavailablethroughMedicarebasedontwocoverage streams:traditional Medicareand Medicare Advantage,andwe describetheMedicaidprograminCalifornia,themostpopulous stateintheUnitedStates.

Wefocusedon adults65andolderwholiveindependentlyin communities(community-dwelling)and whoaccessdentalcare servicesthroughfixedormobiledentalclinics;wedonotinclude adultslivingin institutions(e.g.,nursinghomes,long-termcare facilities,oraged-carehomes),olderadultswhoreceivedental ser-vicesintheirhome(e.g.,domiciliarycareorhomecare),orolder adultswhohavepublicdentalcoveragebasedonspecialstatus(e.g., eligibleveteransinAustralia,CanadaandUnitedStates,Indigenous specificcoveragemodelssuchastheNon-InsuredHealth Bene-fitsinCanada,andIndian HealthServicesintheUnitedStates). We focusedonnon-emergencydentalcareservicesprovidedin out-patientdentalsettings(dentalclinics).

2.3. Datacollectionandsynthesis

Wecollectedinformationonpublicdentalcarecoverage mod-elsforcommunity-dwellingolderadults(≥65yearsold)fromlocal contentexpertsineightjurisdictions,publiclyavailableresources, andpeer-reviewedpublications.First,wedevelopeddatacollection templatesguidedbytheWHOCoverageCubeframework(Fig.1). Membersoftheresearchteamandlocalexpertscompiled den-talcaresystemcharacteristicsfrompublicly availableresources onnational,provincialand/orterritorialgovernmentwebsitesand

(3)

Fig.1. Dimensionsofcoverageforpublicdentalcaremodels.Notes:AdaptedfromtheWorldHealthOrganizationCoveragecubeframework(WorldHealthOrganization.

Chapter2:PrimaryHealthCare-NowMoreThanEver.In:WorldHealthReport2008[Internet].2008.p.41–60.Availablefrom:https://www.who.int/whr/2008/08chap3

en.pdf?ua=1).ThescopeofservicecoverageisdescribedaccordingtoprivateinsurancepackagegroupingsinCanadaacrossmultipleprivateinsurersthatbelongtonational

organization-CanadaLifeandHealthInsuranceAssociation.

fromaseriesoforalhealthreportspublishedintheBritish Den-talJournal[27–30]. Weobtainedestimatesofhealthand dental carespendingineachjurisdictionfromtheOrganisationfor Eco-nomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD)[31].ForItaly,dental spendinginformationwasnotreportedintheOECDHealth Statis-ticsdatabaseandwasprovidedbylocalexperts.Wethencarried out a literature review to supplement thedata collected from localexpertsandfromOECDwithanaimtoidentifystudiesthat described,compared,and/orevaluateddentalcareprogramsfor adultsintheeightjurisdictions.Dataonallelementswereverified bylocalcontentexpertsineachjurisdiction(completedtemplates for each jurisdictionare availableupon request).Our synthesis offersanoverviewofpubliclyfundeddentalcoverageprogramsand doesnotcapturesomekeyfeaturesofdentalcoverageprograms thatmayvaryacrossthejurisdictions.Theseincludeinformationon whethertherearefrequencyrestrictionsandlimitationsonservice coverage,anddetailsontheamountofco-paymentsorvariationin coveragewithinjurisdictionsiftheyexist.

3. Results

3.1. Breadthofcoverage:whoiscovered?

Amongtheeightincludedjurisdictions,therearetwogeneral modelsforbreadthofpublicdentalcarecoverageforolderadults, whichwesummarizeas1)universalpopulation(allolderadults arecovered)and2)targetedpopulation(onlyolderadults who meetaneligibilitycriterionarecovered).Amongthejurisdictions examined,fourcountriesincludeabasketofdentalcareservices withintheirbroaderstatutoryhealthsystemonauniversal popula-tionbasisthuscoveringallolderadults(England,Germany,France, Sweden).Theremainingjurisdictionsdonotincludedentalcare coverageforolderadultsintheirstatutoryhealthsystemsand pub-licdentalcoverageforseniorsisonlyavailablefortargetedgroups thatmeetspecificeligibilitycriteria(Alberta,New SouthWales, Italy,andtheUnitedStates).Thus, inthesecondgroupof juris-dictions,thereisastarkdifferencebetweenhealthcare,whichis offeredto(virtually)allolderadults,anddentalcare,whichisonly availableforsome.Thisdistinction becomesapparentwhen we comparethepublic/privatemixoffinancingthatmakesuptotal healthspendingwithdentalhealthspending.Comparable spend-ingdataareonlyavailableforthegeneralpopulation(wecannot

isolatespendingforolderadultsonly),andtheyareonlyreported atnationallevel(wecannotisolatesub-nationaljurisdictionssuch asprovincesandstates).ItisclearthatinCanada,Australiaand Italy,healthcareismostlypubliclyfunded,yetdentalcareis pre-dominantlyprivatelyfunded(withacombinationofout-of-pocket paymentsandprivateinsurance)(SeeFig.2)[[31,32]].TheUnited Statesistheexception,whereprivatefinancemakesupa signifi-cantshareofbothtotaldentalcareandtotalhealthcarespending (thoughifweweretoisolatethepublicshareoftotalhealthcare fundingforthepopulationaged65yearsandolder,thiswouldbe muchhigherthanforthewholepopulation,atroughlytwo-thirds oftotalspending[34]).Wecategorizethesefourjurisdictionsas “targeted”intheirbreadthofcoveragegiventhatonlyatargeted subsetofolderadultsiscoveredinthepublicdentalcareprogram; thus,publicfundsareaimedatspecificpopulationsubgroups.Fig.2

showsthattheshareofpublicfundingfortotaldentalspendingis generallylowerthanfortotalhealthspendinginthefourcountries withuniversalpopulationcoveragefordentalcare,butthe differ-enceislesspronouncedthanintheotherfourcountrieswithonly targetedcoverageprograms.

Amongthejurisdictionsforwhichonlyasubsetofolderadults iseligible forpubliccoverage,there is someconsistencyinthe criteria usedtodefine eligibility.Table 1 describesthe eligibil-itycriteriaforpubliccoverageinthefourjurisdictionsthathave “targeted”populationcoverage:UnitedStates,Alberta,NewSouth Wales,andItaly.IntheUnitedStates,nearlyallolderadultsare eli-gibleforMedicare,whichisafederalprogramthatcoversthecosts ofhospitalandphysicianservicesaswellasprescriptiondrugs. However,underMedicare,coveragefordentalcareservicesisonly availabletosubgroupsoftheolderadultpopulationwhoeither chooseaMedicareAdvantageplanthatincludesdentalbenefits,or areeligibleforstateMedicaidcoverage.Olderadultswhoarenot enrolledintheseplanscanpurchaseastand-alone/supplemental coverageplan[35].Approximatelyone-thirdofindividualswhoare eligibleforMedicareenrollinMedicareAdvantage.Through Medi-careAdvantage,enrolleeshavetheoptiontochooseaplanthat includesdentalbenefits,whereapproximately60%ofenrolleesdo so[12,36].InCalifornia,anestimated2.6millionadultsage65years andolder(orroughly47%ofallseniorsinthatstate)wereenrolled inaMedicare Advantageplanin2018[37].NearlyallMedicare AdvantageplansinCaliforniaprovidetheoptionofobtaining den-talcoverage,althoughnormallythisentailsanadditionalmonthly

(4)

Fig.2. Sourcesoffundingtotalhealthanddentalcareacrossincludedjurisdictions(2017orlatestavailableyear).

Source:OECDHealthStatistics2019(31);*Italianestimateprovidedseparately[32].Notes:Privateinsuranceincludesbothvoluntaryandcompulsoryprivateinsurance,

whicharereportedseparatelyinOECDHealthStatistics.Thedatadonotpermitseparationofspendingbyagegroup,sowerefertotheentirepopulation.

fee.OlderadultswhoarenotenrolledinMedicareAdvantageplans, butwhoareduallyeligibleforMedicareandMedicaid(low-income status),areeligiblefordentalservicecoverageonlyinsomestates. InCalifornia,dentalcareisincludedintheMedicaidProgram,called Medi-Cal,whichcovered23%ofCalifornianseniorsin2017[38]. Takingthetwopublicprogramstogether,inCalifornia,between onehalfandtwo-thirdsofseniorshavesomeformofpublicdental coverage,thoughthisislikelyanoverestimatesincesomeseniors couldbecoveredinbothprograms.

AlbertaandNewSouthWalesbothoffertargetedpublic cov-eragetoolderadultswhomeetspecificlow-incomecriteria,and inItalythecriteriaconsiderbothincomeandhealthconditions.In Alberta,theincomethresholdissetatalevelthatmeansroughly lessthanhalfofthepopulationofadultsage65yearsandolderin theprovincewouldbeeligibleforanypubliccoverage[39].InNew SouthWales,theincomecriteriaforthatstate’spublicdentalcare aredefinedbytwoCommonwealth(national)programs:the Com-monwealthSeniorsHealthCardandthePensionerConcessionCard. Approximately10%and60%ofresidents65yearsandolderinNew SouthWaleshaveaccesstoaCommonwealthSeniorsHealthCard orPensionerConcessionCard,respectively,andmaybeeligiblefor publicdentalcarecoverage[40,41].InItaly,thereisabroaderset ofeligibilitycriteriathanintheotherjurisdictions,theseinclude low-income,socio-economicvulnerability,andspecifichealth con-ditions(healthvulnerability),which,takentogether,meansthat

roughly25%ofolderadults(age65yearsandolder)areeligiblefor somepublicdentalcoveragethroughtheNationalHealthService.

3.2. Scopeofcoverage:whichdentalservicesarecovered?

Theseconddimensionofcoverage–scope–isaddedtothe com-parisonofdentalcoverageacrosstheeightjurisdictionsinTable2. Mostjurisdictionsincludedinthis studycommit toaminimum scopeofbasicdentalcareserviceswithintheirpublicprogramsthat includeroutineandpreventivedentalcare,suchasexams,x-rays, scaling,fillings,andtoothextractions(Table2).Whilebasicdental careservicesarecoveredinthepublicprogramswereview,the oneexceptionisfluoride,alow-cost,preventivetreatment,which isnotincludedorroutinelycoveredinthepublicprogramsinfour jurisdictions(Alberta,Italy,FranceandGermany).

IntheUnitedStates,there isvariationinthescopeofpublic coverageavailabledependingontheprogram.Thetwomain pro-gramsarethroughMedicaidforlowerincomeolderadultsdually eligibleforMedicareandMedicaid,andMedicareAdvantage.For theformergroup,thescopeofcoveragedependsonstateMedicaid dentalpolicies;thisrangesfromemergencyonlycare,limitedcare, tocomprehensiveservicecoverage[12].Thestate-runprogramin California(Medi-Cal)providescomprehensivescopeofcoverage. Thescopeof dentalcoverage forMedicare Advantageenrollees varieswidelybytheparticularMedicareAdvantageplaninwhich

(5)

Table1

Breadthofcoverage:eligibilitycriteriafortargetedpublicdentalcarecoveragefor

individuals≥65yearsoldinfourjurisdictions.

Overviewofeligibilitycriteria

UnitedStates(Medicare) • Income:duallyeligibleforMedicareand Medicaid(i.e.lowincome)inastate providingoptionaldentalbenefits.In California(Medi-Cal),theincomethreshold issetat138%ofthefederalpovertyline. UnitedStates(Medicare

Advantage)

• Choice:joinsaMedicareAdvantageplan thatincludesdentalcare.

Alberta(Canada) • Income:notearnmorethanthefollowing

establishedprogramthresholds:CA$27,690 (single)orCA$55,380(couple)for100% coverage;andCA$27,690toCA$31,675 (single)orCA$55,380toCA$63,350(couple) forpartial(10−99%)coverage.a

NewSouthWales(Australia) • Income:eligiblefortheCommonwealth

SeniorsHealthCard(e.g.,notearnmorethan

establishedprogramthresholds),orthe

PensionersConcessionCard.b

Italy • Income:declarationoffinancialhardship;

OR

• Clinicalneed:certificateofsystemicdisease

ordisability.c

aBasedon2019incomethresholds[1].In2018theaverageindividualincomefor

seniorsinAlbertawasCA$44,100,andthemedianincomewasCA$32,200(Statistics

Canada2020).ThismeansaboutnearlyhalfofallseniorsinAlbertareceivesome

publicdentalcoverage.

b TheannualincomethresholdfortheCommonwealthSeniorsHealthCardfor

olderadultsage60yearsandolderis:AU$55,808(single);AU$89,290(couples);

AU$111,616(couplesseparatedbyillness,respitecareorprison).Eligibilityforthe

PensionersConcessionCardisreceivinganyofthefollowingCommonwealth

pay-mentsformorethan9months:JobSeekerPayment;ParentingPaymentpartnered,

PartnerAllowance,SicknessAllowance,SpecialBenefit,orWidowAllowance.

c InItaly,theincomeandclinicalneedscriteriaapplybothtotheolder

popula-tion(65yearsandolder)andtothegeneralpopulation(allages).Roughly25%of

the65yearsandolderpopulationwouldmeetthesecriteria.Thespecificcriteria

varybyregion.Forexample,intheLombardyregion,thelow-incomethresholdis

determinedbyayearlypensionbelowD11,500forafamilyoftwo.

thepersonenrolls.Theseplansrangefromnodentalcoverage(40% ofallenrollees),preventiveonly(examsandcleanings)(19%ofall enrollees),comprehensivecoverage(42%ofenrollees),withsome plansprovidingcoverageofmajorservicessuchasdentures[12].

Manypublicprogramsalsoprovidecomprehensivecoverage, whichincludesrootcanaltherapy(alleightjurisdictions),and peri-odontaltreatment(managementofgumdisease)(inallbutAlberta andFrance).Thereisalsosomecoverageformajorservices,such ascrownsandbridges,anddentures,whichareoftenhighercost procedures;allthreeof thesemajorservicesarecoveredinthe publicprogramswereviewedexceptAlbertaandItaly.Nopublic programcoversestheticservices.Overallthenarrowestscopeis seeninAlberta,followedcloselybyItaly.

3.3. Depthofcoverage:howmuchofthecostsarecovered?

Acrosstheeightjurisdictions,thedepthofdentalcoveragefor mostdentalservicesrangesfromshallow(i.e.,thepublicprogram coversonlypartofthetotalcosts)todeep(thepublicprogram cov-ersmostorallofthetotalcosts).Wherethereisshallowcoverage, theremainingcostsmaybepaiddirectlybypatientsthroughout ofpocketpaymentsorprivate(voluntary)dentalinsurance.

Threeofthefourjurisdictionswithuniversalpopulation cover-ageofolderadultsoffershallowcoverageforbasicdentalservices (England,Sweden,andFrance),withdeepcoverageinGermany. InEngland,unlikeotherhealthserviceswherethereisfull finan-cialprotection,fordentalcare,adultpatientsofallagespaypart ofthecostsintheformofaflatfeeforacourseoftreatment(in 2019thefeewas

£

22.70orroughly27EurosforBand1services includingpreventiveexaminationanddiagnosis,and

£

62.10,or75 Euros,forBand2serviceswhichincludessomebasicservicessuch asfillingsbutalsosomemoreexpensiveservicessuchasrootcanal, toothextraction)[42].InSweden,individualsaged65yearsand olderreceiveafixedannualsubsidy(orallowance)of600SEK(57 Euros)tobeusedtowardpreventivedentalcare,andthentheypay anyamountthatexceedsthisvalue.Patientscanusethisgeneral dentalallowanceforexaminations,preventivetreatmentsandany otherdentalcarethatentitlesthemtostatedentalsupport.In addi-tion,thereisanallowanceof600SEK(57Euros)every6months towardspreventivedentalcareforpatientsofallages(including seniorsage65yearsandolder)whoarediagnosedwithamajor diseasewithimplicationsfororalhealth(e.g.,drymouthdueto radiation,Crohn’sdisease,severediabetes).Thus,dentalcareis cov-ereddifferentlyfromotherhealthserviceslikeprimarycareand specialistcarevisits,forwhichtherearefixedco-paymentsinstead ofallowances[43].Inadditiontotheannualsubsidy(allowance) forpreventivedentalcareinSweden,thereiscatastrophiccoverage

Table2

Overviewofthescopeofpublicdentalcoverageavailabletoindividuals≥65yearsoldacrosseightjurisdictions.

Comprehensiveservices Majorservices

Esthetic Basicservices Root canal Periodontal (gum) treatment Crowns& bridges Dentures

Preventiveservices Simple

Fillings Tooth extractions Routine exams Routine x-rays Scaling Fluoride Targeted (sub-setof olderadults) USMedicare/Medicaida √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ USMedicareAdvantageb √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Canada(Alberta) √ √ √ – √ √ √ – – √ – Australia(NSW) √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ – Italy √ √ √ – √ √ √ √ – – – Universal(all olderadults) England √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ – Sweden √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ – France √ √ √ – √ √ √ - √ √ – Germanyc √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Note:√indicatescoverageisavailable,-indicatesnotcovered.Thistabledoesnotcapturefrequencylimitations,discretions,ordepthofcoverageforservices.Preventive

servicesincluderoutineexams,routinex-rays,scaling,fluoride;Basicservicesincludepreventiveservices,simplefillingsandtoothextractions;Comprehensiveservices

includebasicservices,rootcanaltreatment,andperiodontal(gumtreatment);Majorservicesincludecrowns,bridges,anddentures.

aThescopeofcoveragevarieswidelyacrossUSstatessowefocushereonMedi-Cal,theMedicaidprograminCalifornia.

b ThescopeofdentalcoverageforMedicareAdvantageenrolleesisthesameregardlessofincomeorclinicalneedcriteria.

(6)

forotherdentalservices.Fordentalcarecostsabovetheallowance, patientspaythemselvesoutofpocketupto3000SEKinayear (about284Euros),patientsthenpay50%ofthecostsupto15,000 SEK(1420Euros),andtheypayonly15%ofcostsabove15,000SEK (1420Euros).Inaddition,inSwedentherearereferencespricesfor dentalcarewhichplacelimitsoncoverageforpatients,whereby thereisnopubliccoverageofserviceortreatmentcoststhatexceed afixedreferencepriceforthatserviceortreatment[44].InFrance, patientscontributeintheformof30%co-insurance[33]withthese costsoftencoveredbyprivateinsurance,aswithallotherhealth (non-dental)services[33].InGermany,thefullcostofbasicdental careservicesthatfollowadefinedstandardoftreatmentiscovered bythestatutorysocialhealthinsurance(SHI)system,aswithother healthservices.

Amongthesefourjurisdictionswithuniversalpopulation den-talcoverage,coverageisshallowformajorservices,suchascrowns and bridges, and dentures. In England, these servicesare con-sideredaspartof“Band3”courseoftreatmentfor whichthere isa co-payment of

£

256.50(roughly 290Euros).In Franceand Sweden, major services are subject to the same cost sharing arrangementsasforbasicservicesdescribedabove.Dentalcare reformsinFrancethatarecurrentlyunderwaywillremove out-of-pocketpayments formajordentalservicesandthereforewill changethedepthofcoveragefor theseservicesinFrancefrom shallowtodeep,oncethesearefullyimplementedin2023[24]. In Germany, while basic services are fully covered (when the patientfollowsthedefinedstandardoftreatment),thereis shal-lowcoverageofprosthetictreatments(e.g.crowns,dentures).For thosewhohavedefinedclinicalindications,theyreceivea fixed subsidyof50%forstandardcaretreatmentbySHIformajor ser-vices, withhigher fixedsubsidiesavailable for individuals who visitthedentistforregularpreventivecareanddental examina-tions.ThesameamountoffixedsubsidyispaidbySHI(leviedon thecostsofstandardcare)evenifindividualschooseadifferent treatmentoption thanwhatis definedasstandardcare.Thisin turnmeansthatchoosingadifferenttreatment(e.g.higherquality materials)mayleadtohigherout-of-pocketcosts(orthesemay becoveredbycomplementaryprivateinsurance).Thesubsidyis settoincrease to 60%of thecosts ofstandard care in October 2020.

Inthefourjurisdictionswithtargetedpopulationcoverage,the depthofcoverageofbasicdentalcareservicesrangefromshallow todeep(fullycovered)forolderadultswhomeetspecificincomeor clinicalcriteriadependingontheirjurisdiction.InAlberta,thereis deepcoverageforbasicservicesforthelowestincomeolderadults, andshallowcoverageforthosewhomeetaslightlyhigherincome threshold.Howeverpubliccoverageforallenrolleeshasalimitin Alberta:thereisamaximumcoverageofCAD$5000(about3400 Euros)overfiveyears,andsomeserviceshavefrequencylimits(e.g., onecheck-upexaminationperyear).InNewSouthWales,thereis deepcoverageforbasicandmajorservicesforeligibleolderadults whohaveaCommonwealthSeniorsHealthCardorPensioners Con-cessionCardwithnopre-specifiedcapsoncoverage.InItaly,the depthofcoverageavailabletoeligible(targeted)adultsvariesfrom shallowtodeep,since,asnotedintheprevioussection,eligibility isrestrictedtoparticularhealthandsocio-economicconditions, andco-paymentsmayberequiredforsometargetedgroupsfor someservicesaccordingtoamixofnationalandregional provi-sions[45].Forexample,inLombardyRegion,thereisdeepcoverage (noco-payment)forseniorswithayearlypensionbelowD11,500 (forafamilyoftwo),orwithothersocio-economic(unemployed) andhealthvulnerabilities,andincludesbasicservices(preventive visits,fillings,andscaling).IntheUnitedStates,low-incomeolder adultswhoareduallyeligibleforMedicareandMedicaid,orthose whoenrollinMedicareAdvantageplans,sometimesreceive shal-lowcoverage(co-paymentsrequired)fordentalservicesthrough

theseprograms.IntheMedicaidprograminCalifornia,Medi-Cal, there isshallowdepthofcoverage becauseof theco-payments (US$1peroutpatientvisit)andannualcoveragelimitofUS$1800 per year (about 1500 Euros). Note that this coverage limit in California is a soft cap,as it can beexceededin some circum-stancesdeemedmedicallynecessarywithpriorauthorization.For majorservices,thereiseithernopubliccoverage(e.g.,forcrowns andbridgesinAlbertaandItaly),orshallowcoverage.An excep-tionisNewSouthWaleswhichhasdeepcoverageforalleligible seniors.

3.3.1. Extendeddepthofcoverageforvulnerablepopulations Amongthefourjurisdictions withuniversalbreadthof pub-lic dental coverage for older adults (England, France, Sweden, and Germany),there isextended depthof coverageforspecific sub-groupsofthepopulationthatareconsideredvulnerable(see

Table3).EnglandandGermanyprovideextended(deep)coverage toalllower-incomeadults(e.g.,thosewhoreceiveincomesupports, orsocialassistance)andinFrance,itisprovidedtoalladultswith low-income(throughoneofthreeprograms-couverturemaladie universelle-complémentaire(CMU-C),aideàl’acquisitiond’une com-plémentairesanté(ACS)andaidemédicaledel’état(AME))orwith specificlong-termmedicalconditions[33].Swedenconsidersage (65yearsandolder)asoneofthecriteriaforextendedcoverage, whereasotherjurisdictionssetcriteriathatapplytoadultsofall ages.AlladultsinSwedenareeligibleforsubsidizeddentalcare, buttheamountofcoveragevariesbyagegroup:individuals24–29 yearsoldandthose65andolderreceive600SEK,roughly57Euros, peryear,whereasindividuals30–64yearsoldreceive300SEK,or 28.4Euros,peryearforpreventivedentalcare[44].

4. Discussion

Thereisaconsiderablevariationinthebreadth,scopeanddepth ofpublicdentalcoverageforolderadultsacrosseight compara-blehigh-incomejurisdictions.Thesecoveragemodelsfallintofour broadcategories:[1]deeppubliccoverageofbasicdentalservices forasubsetoftheolderadultpopulationdefinedbasedonstrict eli-gibilitycriteria(Alberta,NewSouthWalesandItaly)[2];universal, shallowcoverageofbasicdentalservicesforallolderadults (Eng-land,France,Sweden)[3];universal,deepcoverageofbasicdental servicesforallolderadults(Germany);and[4]shallowcoverage ofbasicservicesavailabletosomesubgroupsofthepopulation (forlower incomeolderadults duallyeligibleforMedicare and Medicaid,e.g.,inCalifornia, andfor olderadultsinsome Medi-careAdvantageplansintheUnitedStates).Withineachofthese categories,therearesomevariations,andnuancesworthnoting. Twojurisdictionsplacefinanciallimitsonthedepthofcoverage, withanannual(or5-year)spendinglimit overwhich thecosts areshiftedontoindividuals(Alberta,andMedi-CalintheUnited States).Twojurisdictionsimposestandard,fixedfeesperservice itemabovewhichthecostsareshiftedtoindividualsiftheychoose amorecostlyserviceorprovider(GermanyandSweden).Inother jurisdictions,coverageisnotlimitedbyfinancialcaps,butisrather throughlimitedsupply,wherebylengthywaitlistsareusedtolimit patientsfromaccessingthepubliclyfundeddentalcareforwhich theyareeligible(NewSouthWales,andItaly).

Amongtheeightjurisdictionsincludedinthisstudy,themodels ofpublicdentalcoveragerelatetosomeextenttothemainmethod offinancingthehealthsystem.Dentalcarecoverageisconsistent with,andtreatedsimilarlyto,otherhealthservicesandincluded inthestatutorybenefitspackageonlyinthetwosocial insurance-financedsystems– FranceandGermany.InFrance,areform to dentalcarethatisintheearlystagesofimplementationaimsto increasepubliccoverage,andreduceout-of-pocketpayments,for

(7)

Table3

Overviewofthedepthofpublicdentalcoverageavailabletoindividuals≥65yearsoldacrosseightjurisdictions.

Comprehensiveservices Majorservices

Esthetic Basicservices Root canal Periodontal (gum) treatment Crowns& bridges Dentures

Preventiveservices Simple

Fillings Tooth extractions Routine exams Routine x-rays Scaling Fluoride Targeted population (sub-setof older adults) USMedicaid (Medi-Cal)a

Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow –

USMedicare

Advantageb

Deep Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow –

Canada

(Alberta)c

Deep Deep Deep – Deep Deep Deep – – Shallow –

Australia (NSW)

Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep –

Italy Deep Deep Deep – Deep Deep Deep Deep – – –

Universal population (allolder adults) England Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep –

Sweden Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow Shallow –

France Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep – Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep - Shallow+ Deep Shallow+ Deep –

Germanyd Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Deep Shallow+

Deep

Shallow+

Deep –

Note:-indicatesnotcovered.Preventiveservicesincluderoutineexams,routinex-rays,scaling,fluoride;Basicservicesincludepreventiveservices,simplefillingsandtooth

extractions;Comprehensiveservicesincludebasicservices,rootcanaltreatment,andperiodontal(gumtreatment);Majorservicesincludecrowns,bridges,anddentures.

aThisclassificationreflectsthecoverageforolderadultsdualeligibleforMedicareandMedicaidinCalifornia(inMedi-Cal),anddoesnotreflectthescopecoveragefor

acrossallstates.Forexample,thescoperangesfromlimitednumberofexamsorcleanings;emergencyservicesonly;moreextensivebenefitswithannualcaponbenefits.

b ThescopeofdentalcoverageforMedicareAdvantageenrolleesisthesameregardlessofincomeorclinicalneedcriteria.

c This“deep”classificationinAlbertaonlypertainstothelowestincomegroupforwhichtherearenoco-payments,andwithinthelimitofCA$5000/5years.

d Onlyforpre-definedbasicstandardcare,seeabove;Coverageformajorservicesissetat50%(60%inOctober2020)oftotalcost,andrequiresasubstantialOOPco-payment.

Thiscoveragecanincreaseforpatientswhomakeregularuseofpreventiveservices.Additionalcoverageisavailabletoindividualswhofulfillincomecriteria.

severaldentalcareservices[24].InGermany,dentalcareservices areawell-establishedcomponentofhealthcare,and,consequently, thebenefitbasket.Thisisreflectedintheparticipationofthe Fed-eralAssociationofDentistsintheFederalJointCommittee,which decidesthescopeofcoverage.Itisthereforeunlikelythatdental carewouldbefullyremovedfromthebenefitcatalogue.Incontrast, inthetax-fundedsystemswithuniversaldentalcoverageforall adults-EnglandandSweden,thedepthofcoverageandmechanism offinancearedifferentfordentalcarethanforotherhealth ser-vices.IntheEnglishNationalHealthService(NHS),whichdoesnot haveanexplicitlydefinedbenefitspackage,therehasbeenasteady declineinthepublicfinancingofdentalcaresincetheearly1990s, asco-paymentshaveincreasedsincetheywereinitiallyintroduced shortlyaftertheintroductionoftheNHS[46].Germanyrecently passedalawextendingpublicfinancingfordentures,crowns,and bridgesfrom50%ofthedefinedcostofstandardcaretreatment to60%(this willtakeeffectinOctober 2020),witheven higher fixedsubsidiesinthecaseofregularpreventivecareanddental examinations.Theremainingfourjurisdictionsprovidedental cov-erageonlytoasubsetofitspopulation,thustreatingitmorelikea safetynetprogramthanaspartofthebroaderhealthcoverage sys-tem.Interestingly,onlyinGermanyisthereanexplicitattemptto usefinancialincentives(deepercoverage)tosteerpatientstoward morepreventivedentalcareseekingbehaviours(e.g.,check-ups). InSweden,theuseofallowancesforpreventivedentalcaremay alsoincentivizeannualpreventivecheck-upsbecausethereareno co-paymentsfordentalcostswithinthatallowance.

4.1. Populationcoverageforolderadults

Whilethefocusofthisstudyisonolderadults,itisimportant tonotethatthreeoftheeightjurisdictionsweincludedonotmake anydistinctiontocoverageforolderadultscomparedtoyounger adults(France,Germany,England).Olderageisoneofthecriterion fordeterminingcoverageintheotherfivejurisdictionsweinclude (UnitedStates,Sweden,Italy,Alberta,andNewSouthWales).The

MedicareprogramintheUnitedStatesisage-based:itcoversthe 65yearsandolderpopulationalongwithsomepeoplewith disabil-ities,anddentalcoverageisavailableforthosethatarelowincome andqualifyforMedicaid,orthosewhooptforaspecificMedicare Advantageplanthatincludesdentalcare.ForthestateofCalifornia, betweenhalfandtwo-thirdsoftheolderadultpopulationwould becoveredbyeitherMedicaid(Medi-Cal)orMedicareAdvantage. InSweden,ageisonlyconsideredasacriterionfortheextended depthofcoverage.InItaly,AlbertaandNewSouthWales,theage criterioniscombinedwithadditionalfinancialeligibilitycriteria. 4.2. Financialprotectionandtheroleofprivateinsurance

Thereissomeevidencefromtheliteraturetosuggestthat cost-barrierstodentalcareareloweronaverageinjurisdictionswith universalpopulationcoveragethatisshallowthanthosewith tar-getedpopulationcoveragethatisdeepforasubsetofolderadults [6,7,47]. While jurisdictions withtargeted population coverage providedeepcoverageofsomeservicestoeligibleolderadults,the designofthecoverageprogramsmeansthatthoseineligiblefor publiccoverage(e.g.,withincomethatfallsjustabovethe thresh-old)maynotbeabletoafforddentalcarecosts.

Private(voluntary)insuranceplaysanimportantroleinsome jurisdictionsinfinancingdentalcareforthegeneralpopulation,as notedinFig.2;italsoplaysaroleinprotectingolderadultsfromthe costsofdentalcare,inparticularinAustralia,FranceandtheUnited States.InAustralia,anestimated46%ofindividualsaged65years andolderhavesomelevelofprivatehealthinsurancethatcovers dentalcare[46].IntheUnitedStates,nearly8%ofMedicare benefi-ciarieshaveprivateinsurancethatcoversdentalcare,comparedto 27%withcoveragethroughMedicareAdvantageorMedicaidwhich leaves65%withnodentalcarecoverage[12].Intheother coun-tries,dataonprivateinsurancecoverageisavailableonlyforthe generalpopulationandsoweareunabletoestimateandcompare coveragefortheolderpopulation.Forexample,inFrance,nearlyall individualshavevoluntaryhealthinsurance(96%),coveringthe

(8)

co-insuranceforhealthanddentalservices[48],whichsuggeststhat mostolderpeopleholdthiscoverageaswell.Inothercountries, privatehealthinsuranceislessprevalent,e.g.,lessthan5%ofthe generalpopulationinSweden,andabout11%ofthegeneral pop-ulationtheUK[48].InCanada,privateinsuranceiscloselytiedto employmentandthereislimiteddataonthedentalcarecoverage ofolderadults,withsurveydatasuggestingadecreaseinemployer coverageinthispopulationoverthedecade2005–2014[49].While someolderadultswillcontinuetobecoveredthroughtheir pre-viousemployersandsomemaychoosetopurchaseanindividual plan,otherswouldpayoutofpocket.Furthercomparativeresearch onthebreadth,depthandscopeofprivateinsurancecoveragefor dentalcarewouldhelptoshedlightontheextenttowhichthey providefinancialprotectionforolderadults.

4.3. Servicecoverage

Ingeneral,eachjurisdictioncoversabasicsetofserviceswithin theirpublicprograms.Withintheseprograms,mostjurisdictions coverpreventiveservices,suchasdentalexams,x-rays,and scal-ing,butfourofeight(Alberta,Italy,France,andGermany)donot routinelycoverfluoridetreatmentsforolderadults.Olderadults areatgreaterriskofdevelopingdecayondentalrootsurfacesof theirteeth,whichcanbepreventedthroughregular profession-allyappliedfluoridetreatments[50].Intermsofcomprehensive andmajorservices,allpublicprogramsincludesomecoveragefor rootcanals,andmostcoverperiodontal(gum)treatment,crowns andbridges,anddentures.Thelackofpubliccoverageforthese servicesinsomejurisdictionsmaybeduetotheriskof overtreat-ment,lackofevidenceontheeffectivenessofthesetreatments, andlackofclinicalguidelinesindentistry[51,52].Itisimportantto notethatwhilesomepubliccoverageisavailableformajorservices acrossmostofthejurisdictionsinthisstudy,barrierstoaccessing theseservicesmaystillexist.Forexample,priorapprovaland co-paymentsmayberequiredbeforeservices,suchascrowns,root canaltherapy,ordentures,canberendered.Buildingonprevious workfromEatonandcolleagues(2018),caseprofilesandvignettes canbeutilized tocomparethetypesofcareandservices avail-ableforindividualswithdifferentclinicalconditionsandtreatment needs[53].Thistypeofanalysiscanhelpdescribetheextentto whichdifferentcoveragemodelsaddressdifferentdentaldiseases andconditions,suchastoothdecayand/orgumdisease.

4.4. Contextualandsystem-levelconsiderations

Whilethis studydescribesaspectsofpublicdentalcare cov-eragemodelsforolderadults,thereareseveralotherfactorsthat mayaffecttheaccessibilityandeffectivenessofdentalcare cover-age.First,socialandculturalfactors,includinglanguage,education, andhealthliteracymayimpactaccesstocareforparticular sub-groupsofolderadults(e.g.,immigrants)[54].Second,clinicalneeds anddentalutilizationpatternsmaydifferbetweenlow-and high-incomeearningolderadults[55],whichwould beimportantto considerwhendevelopingcoveragemodelsforsubgroupsofthe population.Third,modelsoforganizationanddeliveryofdental caremayimpactaccess.Thereissomeevidencethatclinicsetting maynotimpactaccesstocarewithinpublicdentalcareprograms: studiesfromSwedenandtheUnitedKingdomsuggesttheredoes notappeartobedifferencesinperceptionsofqualityofcareor costbarrierstocareforadultsand olderadultsbetweenpublic andprivateclinics[56,57].Fourth,themethodofpayingdentists and deliverysetting appearstoimpactoutcomes: one studyin Australiafoundthat salarieddentistsinpublicclinics aremore costeffectiveand haveloweroverall coststhandentistsin pri-vateclinicswhoarepaidbyFFSorvouchers;yetdentistsinprivate clinicspaidbyvoucherswereassociatedwithhighervolumeof

servicesprovidedthantheothertwopaymentanddelivery mod-els[58].Paymentreformswithinpublicdentalcaremodelscanalso influenceproviderbehaviours[59].Finally,accesstodentalcareis limitedduetocapacityandsupplyconstraintswithinpublicdental careclinicsandhighdemandfordentalcareinsomejurisdictions. Forexample,onlyabout20%ofindividualseligibleforpublicdental coverageareabletoreceivedentalcareinAustralia,whichhasled tolongwaitingtimesforcare[10].Thus,whilethemodelofdental coverageintermsofitsbreadth,depthandscopelikelyimpacts accesstodentalcareandrelatedoralhealthoutcomesforolder adults,therearemanyothersystemstructuressuchasprovider paymentmodels,extentandtypeofout-of-pocketpayments, sup-plyandorganizationalfactorsthatalsoimpactfinancialprotection andaccessibilityofdentalcareacrossandwithinthese jurisdic-tions.Thesecontextualandsystem-levelfactorsimpactingaccess todentalcarewarrantfurtherattention.

4.5. Limitationsandstrengths

Thisreviewdrewonpubliclyavailableinformationand contri-butionsbylocalexperts.Therearelimiteddataavailableonoral healthoutcomes,qualityofdentalcare,dentalvisitingbehaviours, anddentalcareutilization.Therearenoconsistentorstandardized oralhealthindicatorstocomparejurisdictions(OECD,WorldBank, WHOandtheEuropeanUnion).Ourcomparisonsreliedlargelyon datacollecteddirectlyfromlocalexperts,includingmembersof ourprojectteam,and internationalsurveysthathad consistent methodologyandthatreportedestimatesforjurisdictionsinour study.DentalcarespendingdatawerealsonotavailableforItaly andthuswereliedonlocalsources,whichmaynotbedirectly com-parabletotheOECDestimates.Thisreviewdidnotdescribeother keyfeaturesofdentalcoverageprogramsthatvaryacrossthe juris-dictions,suchasnon-financialbarrierstoaccesssuchaswaiting times,continuityofcare,ordifferencesthedeliveryofdentalcare acrosspublic(e.g.governmentownedclinics)andprivatesectors. Finally,wedidnotcomparetheproviderfeeswithinandbetween dentalservicefeeschedulesofprivateandpublicsystems.Many jurisdictionshaveprivateandpublicdentalservicefeeschedules (e.g.,inFrance,Sweden,andCanada)wherethefeesarehigherin privatecomparedtopublicfeeguides.Theseaspectsofdentalcare coveragecouldbetopicsforfutureresearch.

5. Conclusion

Thisstudyprovidesanin-depthcomparisonofthepublic cov-erageofdentalcareforolderadultsacrossarangeofhigh-income jurisdictions.Whileolderageisanimportantconsiderationinthe design ofpubliccoverageinAlberta,New SouthWalesand the UnitedStates,severaljurisdictionsdonotconsiderageasan eligi-bilitycriterionforpubliccoverage(England,France,andGermany). Moreover,alljurisdictionsweinclude,exceptSweden,provide dif-ferential (e.g.,extended depth)coverage for those who meet a specificlow-incomethreshold.Oneoftheprioritiesforimproving oralhealthoutcomesacrosscountriesistointegratedentalcare ser-vicesintothebroaderhealthsystem[60,61].Ourfindingssuggest thatthelevelofintegrationmaybemorefeasibleinsome coun-triesthaninothersdependingonthecurrentapproachtocoverage thatrangesfromfullyintegratedintothebenefitspackagetoalmost completelyseparatefromthecoverageofhealthcaremorebroadly. Furtherresearchcantestthesepatternsacrossalargernumberof countriesandtesttheimpactsofthesestructuraldifferenceson accessandoral healthoutcomes.Duetothelimitedavailability ofcomparabledatawithinandacrossjurisdictions,inparticular thoseoutsidetheEuropeanregion,furtherresearchwouldbenefit fromstandardizeddatacollectioninitiativesfororalhealth

(9)

mea-sures.Futureworkshouldalsoconsidertheroleofdifferentsystem andprovider-levelfactors(suchaspublic/privatedeliverysetting andproviderskill-mixwithinpublicdentalcoveragemodels),the impactsoflimitedsupplyonaccesstocareevenamongeligible individuals,andtheextenttowhichcost-effectivenessorclinical effectivenessevidenceinformsdecisionsonwhichservicesare cov-ered.Finally,thereisaneedtoconsiderhowmodelsofpublicdental carecoveragecouldenabletheintegrationoforalhealthcarewith medicalcaretobettermeettheneedsofthegrowingpopulationof olderadultswithmultiplehealthconditions.

DeclarationofCompetingInterest None.

Acknowledgements

Weacknowledgetheexpertinsightsandreviewofprevious ver-sionsof this paperbythe followingindividuals:PaulBatchelor (University College London), Marie Böcker (Technische Univer-sität Berlin), Susanne Felgner (Technische Universität Berlin), RainerJordan(InstitutderDeutschenZahnärzte),Daniela Carmag-nola(MilanMunicipality,Italy),SandyLantz(MalmöUniversity, Sweden),RebeccaNg(UniversityofToronto),andSylvie Azogui-Lévy(DepartmentofPublicHealth,UniversityParis-Diderot).We receivedfundingfromConverge3,apolicyresearchcentrebasedat theUniversityofToronto.

AppendixA. Supplementarydata

Supplementarymaterialrelatedtothisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,atdoi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020. 06.015.

References

[1]Peres MA, Macpherson LM, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur

MR, et al. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. The Lancet

2019;394(10194):249–60,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31146-8.

[2]HeinC,CobbC,IacopinoA.Reportoftheindependentpanelofexpertsof

theScottsdaleProject.GrandRoundsinOral-SystemicMedicine2007;2:1–27

[Internet] Available from: https://www.caseyhein.C.om/wp-content/

uploads/2012/09/REPORTOFTHEINDEPENDENTPANElOFEXPERTSOF THESCOTTSDALEPROJECT1.pdf.

[3]CanadianAcademyofHealthSciences[Internet]Availablefrom:Improving

access to oralhealth care for vulnerablepeople living inCanada; 2014

http://cahs-acss.ca/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/AccesstoOralCareFINAL REPORTEN.pdf.

[4]CanadianDentalAssociation.CanadianDentalAssociation:thestateoforal healthinCanada[Federal/national];2017.

[5]Commonwealth Fund [Internet] Available from: 2016 Commonwealth

FundInternationalHealthpolicysurveypfadults(age18andolder);2016

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/surveys/2016/nov/2016-commonwealth-fund-international-health-policy-survey-adults.

[6]TchicayaA,LorentzN.Socioeconomicinequalitiesinthenon-useofdentalcare

inEurope.InternationalJournalforEquityinHealth2014;13(101147692):7,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-13-7[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[7]Chaupain-GuillotS,GuillotO.Healthsystemcharacteristicsandunmetcare

needsinEurope:ananalysisbasedonEU-SILCdata.TheEuropeanJournalof

HealthEconomics2015;16(7):781–96,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10198-014-0629-x[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[8]Rootcauses:qualityandinequalityindentalhealth[Internet].TheNuffield

Trust;2017[cited2020Feb6].Availablefrom:https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.

uk/research/root-causes-quality-and-inequality-in-dental-health.

[9]BlomqvistA,WoolleyF,Availablefrom:Fillingthecavities:improvingthe

effi-ciencyandequityofCanada’sdentalcaresystem;2018https://econpapers.

repec.org/RePEc:cdh:commen:510.

[10]DuckettS,CowgillM,SwerissenH[Internet]Availablefrom:Fillingthegap:a

universaldentalschemeforAustralia.GrattanInst.;2019https://grattan.edu.

au/report/filling-the-gap/.

[11]MooreD,DaviesGM.Asummaryofknowledgeabouttheoralhealthofolder

peopleinEnglandandWales.CommunityDentHealth2016;33(4):262–6,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1922/CDH3884Moore05[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[12]FreedM.,NeumanT.,JacobsonG.DrillingDownonDentalCoverageandCosts

forMedicareBeneficiaries.

[13]KravitzA,BullockA,CowpeJ,Availablefrom:CouncilofEuropeanDentists:

manualofdentalpractice2015.[Internet].5.1.CardiffUniversity.Wales,United

Kingdom:TheCouncilofEuropeanDentists;2015http://www.eoo.gr/files/

pdfs/enimerosi/EUManualofDentalPractice2015Edition5.1.pdf.

[14]D’AiutoF,GableD,SyedZ,AllenY,WanyonyiKL,WhiteS,etal.Evidence

summary:therelationshipbetweenoraldiseasesanddiabetes.BritishDental

Journal 2017;222(12):944, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.544

[Inter-net]Availablefrom:.

[15]PetersenPE.Continuousimprovementoforalhealthinthe21stcentury:the approachoftheWHOGlobalOralHealthProgramme;2004.

[16]ManskiRJ,MoellerJ,ChenH,BurtonPA,SchimmelJ,MagderL,etal.Dental

careexpendituresandretirement:dentalcareandretirement.JournalofPublic

HealthDentistry2010;(January),http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2009.

00156.x[Internet][cited2019May16];no-no.Availablefrom:.

[17]ListlS.Inequalitiesindentalattendancethroughoutthelife-course.

Jour-nalofDentalResearch2012;91(7 suppl):S91–97,http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/

0022034512447953[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[18]ListlS.Income-relatedinequalitiesindenture-wearingbyEuropeansaged50

andabove.Gerodontology2012;29(2):e948–55,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.

1741-2358.2011.00590.x[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[19]ListlS.Income-relatedinequalitiesindentalserviceutilizationbyEuropeans

aged50+.JournalofDentalResearch2011;90(6):717–23,http://dx.doi.org/10.

1177/0022034511399907[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[20]Listl S, Moran V, Maurer J, Faggion Jr CM. Dental service utilization

by Europeans aged 50 plus. Community Dentistry and Oral

Epidemiol-ogy2012;40(2):164–74,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00639.x

[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[21]PalènciaL,EspeltA,Cornejo-OvalleM,BorrellC.Socioeconomicinequalitiesin

theuseofdentalcareservicesinEurope:whatistheroleofpubliccoverage?

CommunityDentistryandOralEpidemiology2014;42(2):97–105,http://dx.

doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12056[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[22]ManskiR,MoellerJ,ChenH,WidströmE,LeeJ,ListlS.Disparityindental

cov-erageamongolderadultpopulations:acomparativeanalysisacrossselected

EuropeancountriesandtheUSA.IntDentJ2015;65(2):77–88,http://dx.doi.

org/10.1111/idj.12139[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[23]Böhm K, Schmid A, Götze R, Landwehr C, Rothgang H. Five types of

OECD healthcare systems: empirical results of a deductive

classifica-tion.HealthPolicy2013;113(3):258–69,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.

2013.09.003[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[24]MazevetME,GarygaV,MayneC,PittsNB,PenningtonMW.2018French

DentalContracts:ontheroadtoachievingUniversalDentalHealth

Cover-age?HealthPolicy2020;(May):23,http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.

04.016[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[25]ShawJL,FarmerJW.Anenvironmentalscanofpubliclyfinanceddentalcarein Canada:2015update;2015.p.208.

[26]OntarioLaunchesFreeRoutineDentalCareforLow-IncomeSeniors[Internet].

news.ontario.ca.[cited2020May15].Availablefrom:https://news.ontario.ca/

opo/en/2019/11/ontario-launches-free-routine-dental-care-for-low-income-seniors.html.

[27]Bindi M,PaganelliC,Eaton KA,Widström E.The healthcaresystem and

theprovisionoforalhealthcareinEuropeanUnionmemberstates.Part8:

Italy.BritishDentalJournal2017;222(10):809,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.

bdj.2015.95[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[28]Pegon-MachatE,FaulksD,EatonKA,WidströmE,HuguesP,Tubert-Jeannin

S.ThehealthcaresystemandtheprovisionoforalhealthcareinEUMember

States:France.BritishDentalJournal2016;220(February(4)):197–203,http://

dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.138[cited2019May16][Internet]Available from:.

[29]ZillerS,EatonKE,WidströmE.Thehealthcaresystemandtheprovisionoforal

healthcareinEuropeanUnionmemberstates.Part1:Germany.BritishDental

Journal2015;218(February(4)):239–44,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.

95[cited2019May16][Internet]Availablefrom:.

[30]PälvärinneR,WidströmE,ForsbergBC,EatonKA,BirkhedD.Thehealthcare

sys-temandtheprovisionoforalhealthcareinEuropeanUnionmemberstates.Part

9:Sweden.BritishDentalJournal2018;224(April(8)):647–51,http://dx.doi.

org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.269[cited2019May16][Internet].Availablefrom:.

[31]OECD[Internet]Availablefrom:Healthstatisticsdatabase;2019https://stats.

oecd.org/index.aspx?r=513451#.

[32]ItalianNationalInstituteofStatistic(ISTAT)[Internet]Availablefrom:Access

todentalcareanddentalhealthinItaly;2015https://www.istat.it/en/archive/

164066.

[33]France:countryhealthprofile. -en- OECD;2019[Internet].[cited2020

Feb 20].Available from:

http://www.oecd.org/publications/france-country-health-profile-2019-d74dbbda-en.htm.

[34]DeNardiM,FrenchE,JonesJB,McCauleyJ[cited2020May1].(NBER

Work-ingPaperNo.21270).[Internet]Availablefrom:MedicalspendingoftheU.S.

Elderly.Cambridge,MA:NationalBureauofEconomicResearch;2015https://

www.nber.org/papers/w21270.pdf.

[35]WillinkA,ReedNS,SwenorB,LeinbachL,DuGoffEH,DavisK.Dental,vision,

andhearingservices:access,spending,andcoverageformedicarebeneficiaries.

HealthAffairs(Millwood)2020;39(February(2)):297–304,http://dx.doi.org/

10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00451[cited2020Feb14][Internet]Availablefrom:.

[36]McWilliamsJM,AfendulisCC,McGuireTG,LandonBE.ComplexMedicare

(10)

decisionmaking.HealthAffairs(Millwood)2011;30(9):1786–94,http://dx.doi. org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0132[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[37]CMSprogramstatistics[Internet].Baltimore,Maryland:CentresforMedicare

&MedicaidServices;2018[cited2020May1].Availablefrom:https://www.

cms.gov/files/document/2018-mdcr-enroll-ab-2.pdf.

[38]FinocchioL,NewmanM,RohE,Availablefrom:Californiahealthcarealmanac

-Medicalfactsandfigures:crucialcoverageforlow-incomeCalifornians

[Inter-net].Oakland,CA:CaliforniaHealthCareFoundation;2019https://www.chcf.

org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/MediCalFactsFiguresAlmanac2019.pdf.

[39]StatisticsCanada[cited2020Jun10].Availablefrom:GovernmentofCanada.

Table11-10-0190-01.Marketincome,governemnttransfers,totalincome,

incometaxandafter-taxincomebyeconomicfamilytype.[Internet];2019

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=1110019001.

[40]AustralianGovernment[Internet][cited2020Jun12].Availablefrom:DSS

pay-mentdemographicdata(December2019);2020https://data.gov.au/dataset/

ds-dga-cff2ae8a-55e4-47db-a66d-e177fe0ac6a0/details?q=.

[41]AustralianBureauofStatistics[Internet][cited2020Jun12].Availablefrom:

Australiandemographicstatistics,sep2019(3101.0);2020https://www.abs.

gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/3101.0.

[42]HowmuchwillIpayforNHSdentaltreatment?[Internet].nhs.uK;2018[cited

2020Feb18].Availablefrom:https://www.nhs.uk/common-health-questions/

dental-health/how-much-will-i-pay-for-nhs-dental-treatment/.

[43]Glenngård AH. The Swedish health care system, 2014. International

Profiles of Health Care Systems 2020;5(June):133–41 [Internet]

Avail-ablefrom:

https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/sweden.

[44]Dentalcaresubsidy[Internet].[cited2020Jan14].Availablefrom:https://

www.forsakringskassan.se/privatpers/tandvard/tandvardsstod.

[45]Ferré F, de Belvis AG, Valerio L, Longhi S, Lazzari A, Fattore G, et al,

Jun 5; Available from: Italy: health system review; 2020 https://www.

commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/italy.

[46]RobinsonR,PatelD,PennycateR[cited2019May16].Availablefrom:

Asso-ciationofBritishPharmaceuticalIndustry,OfficeofHealthEconomics.The

economicsofdentalcare[internet].London:OfficeofHealthEconomics;2004

http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rwhi20/.

[47]Commonwealth Fund, Available from: Commonwealth fund

interna-tional health policy survey of older adults [Internet]; 2017 https://

www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/surveys/2016/nov/2016-commonwealth-fund-international-health-policy-survey-adults.

[48]SaganA,ThomsonS,Availablefrom:VoluntaryhealthinsuranceinEurope:

countryexperience[Internet].EuropeanObservatoryonHealthSystemsand

Policies;2016

http://www.euro.who.int/en/publications/abstracts/voluntary-health-insurance-in-europe-country-experience-2016.

[49]ChanFKI,McGrailK,MajumdarSR,LawMR.Changesinemployer-sponsored

privatehealthinsuranceamongretireesinOntario:across-sectionalstudy.

CMAJOpen2019;7(January(1)):E15–22[cited2020Feb6][Internet]Available

from:http://www.cmajopen.ca/content/7/1/E15.

[50]ZhangJ,SardanaD,Wong MCM,LeungKCM,LoECM.Factorsassociated

with dental root caries: a systematic review. JDR Clinical &

Transla-tionalResearch2019,http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2380084419849045[Internet]

Availablefrom:.

[51]Meyer-LueckelH,MachiulskieneV,GiacamanRA.Howtointerveneinthe

rootcariesprocess?Systematicreviewandmeta-analyses.CariesResearch

2019:1–10,http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000501588[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[52]vanderSandenWJ,MettesDG,PlasschaertAJ,van’tHofMA,GrolRP, Ver-donschotEH. Clinicalpracticeguidelinesin dentistry:opinionsofdental practitionersontheircontributiontothequalityofdentalcare.BMJQuality &Safety2003;12(2):107–11.

[53]EatonKA,RamsdaleM,LeggettH,CsikarJ,VinallK,WheltonH,etal.Variations

intheprovisionandcostoforalhealthcarein11Europeancountries:acase

study.InternationalDentalJournal2019;69(2):130–40,http://dx.doi.org/10.

1111/idj.12437[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[54]AarabiG,ReissmannDR,SeedorfU,BecherH,HeydeckeG,KofahlC.Oralhealth

andaccesstodentalcare-acomparisonofelderlymigrantsandnon-migrants

inGermany.Ethnicity&Health2018;23(7):703–17,http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/

13557858.2017.1294658[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[55]McKenzieKW,GoodwinM,PrettyI.NHSdentalserviceutilisationandsocial

deprivation inolder adults in North WestEngland. British Dental

Jour-nal2017;223(2):102–7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.624[Internet]

Availablefrom:.

[56]DerblomC,Hagman-GustafssonM-L,GabreP.Dentalattendancepatterns

among older people: a retrospective review of records in public and

private dental care in Sweden. International Journal of Dental Hygiene

2017;15(4):321–7,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/idh.12265[Internet] Available

from:.

[57]TickleM,O’MalleyL,BrocklehurstP,GlennyA-M,WalshT,CampbellS.A

nationalsurveyofthepublic’sviewsonqualityindentalcare.BritishDental

Journal2015;219(3):E1,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.595[Internet]

Availablefrom:.

[58]ConquestJH,SkinnerJ,KrugerE,TennantM.Dentalcarefortheelderlythrough

aCapped-feefundingmodel:optimisingoutcomesforprimarygovernment

dentalservices.Gerodontology2017;34(4):486–92,http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/

ger.12297[Internet]Availablefrom:.

[59]MazevetME,GarygaV,PittsNB,PenningtonMW.Thehighlycontroversial

paymentreformofdentistsinFrance:seekinganewcompromiseafterthe

2017strike.HealthPolicy2018;122(December(12)):1273–7[cited2019May

16][Internet]Availablefrom:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/

pii/S0168851018305591.

[60]FederationDentaireInternational,Availablefrom:Universalhealthcoverage:

oralhealthforall;2019https://www.fdiworlddental.org/sites/default/files/

media/resources/factsheet-2019-universalhealthcoverage.pdf.

[61]PrasadM,ManjunathC,MurthyAK,SampathA,JaiswalS,MohapatraA.

Inte-grationoforalhealthintoprimaryhealthcare:asystematicreview.Journalof

FamilyMedicineandPrimaryCare2019;8(June(6)):1838–45[Internet]

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The availability and reporting of GBD figures for Italy is a valuable contribution towards public health research, practice, and policy, not only for the wealth of descriptive

Reemphasize our resolve to achieve universal health coverage by 2030 and to stop the rise of catastrophic out-of-pocket health spending by providing financial risk protection

Target: Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk protection, access to quality essential health-care services and access to safe, effective, quality and

It is apparent from the table that low-income countries could save annually 12–24% of their total health spending by improving hospital or workforce efficiency,

Citizens of countries with low levels of public expenditure on health usually experience high levels of out-of-pocket payments, which may lead to financial hardship for households

Universal health coverage enables everyone to access the services that address the most important causes of disease and death and ensures that the quality of those services is

Three major information systems are used to monitor progress towards UHC: first, household surveys, especially the National Health Services Survey, which periodically provide data

We will not try to summarize the 10 points above which clearly highlight the difference between what public health practitioners are looking for when they assess progress in UHC