REVIEW
Emerging data supporting stromal cell therapeutic potential
in cancer: reprogramming stromal cells of the tumor
microenvironment for anti-cancer effects
Armel H. Nwabo Kamdje1, Paul F. Seke Etet2,3, Richard Tagne Simo1, Lorella Vecchio3, Kiven Erique Lukong4, Mauro Krampera5
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ngaoundere, Faculty of Science, Ngaoundere 454, Cameroon; 2Department
of Physiological Sciences and Biochemistry, University of Ngaoundéré, Garoua 454, Cameroon; 3Center for Sustainable
Health and Development, Garoua 454, Cameroon; 4Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology & Immunology, University of
Saskatchewan, College of Medicine, Saskatoon SK S7N 5E5, Canada; 5Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Section
of Hematology, Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Verona 37134, Italy
ABSTRACT After more than a decade of controversy on the role of stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment, the emerging data shed light on pro-tumorigenic and potential anti-cancer factors, as well as on the roots of the discrepancies. We discuss the pro-tumorigenic effects of stromal cells, considering the effects of tumor drivers like hypoxia and tumor stiffness on these cells, as well as stromal cell-mediated adiposity and immunosuppression in the tumor microenvironment, and cancer initiating cells’ cellular senescence and adaptive metabolism. We summarize the emerging data supporting stromal cell therapeutic potential in cancer, discuss the possibility to reprogram stromal cells of the tumor microenvironment for anti-cancer effects, and explore some causes of discrepancies on the roles of stromal cells in cancer in the available literature.
KEYWORDS Stromal cells; tumorigenic effects; anti-cancer effects; tumor microenvironment; reprogramming
Introduction
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are a heterogeneous mes-enchymal cell population, commonly collected from the bone marrow (BM), fat, and other tissues, that includes multipotent stem cells capable of differentiating into a number of mesen-chymal tissues, and thus can contribute to tissue repair. MSCs are positive for membranes CD105, CD73, and CD90, and neg-ative for CD14, CD19, CD31, CD34, CD45, and HLA-DR1,2.
MSC differentiation potential includes various cell types of the mesodermal lineage, such as fibroblasts, adipocytes, endothe-lial cells, myocytes, chondrocytes, and osteoblasts1, while
non-mesodermal differentiation, such as into neural, hepatic,
pancreatic, and gastric cells, is still debated3-6. However, MSCs
reside not only in the stroma of various tissues and organs, but also in the tumor microenvironment, where their role has been clarified recently7,8. Overall, a huge body of evidence
sup-ports that MSCs can promote tumorigenic processes, such as: (i) angiogenesis, neovascularization and formation of cancer stem cell (CSC) niche; (ii) malignant transformation, main-tenance of cancer cells, and metastasis formation; as well as (iii) cancer cell stemness and chemoresistance to anti-cancer drugs9,10.
On the other hand, MSCs have become a key tool in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, because they are easily collected and have the ability to migrate and home into dam-aged tissues. Here, they: (i) interact with the microenviron-ment to drive tissue repair; (ii) differentiate into the specific affected cell types to restore or replace damaged tissues; and (iii) rescue organ functions, thanks to their high proliferation, adhesion, migration, differentiation, and immunoregulatory properties11-13. Notably, MSC secretome includes numerous
factors favoring tissue repair, such as angiopoietin-1, vascu-lar endothelial growth factor (VEGF), transforming growth Correspondence to: Armel H. Nwabo Kamdje
E-mail: [email protected]
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-7628 Received: March 24, 2020; accepted: August 20, 2020. Available at www.cancerbiomed.org
©2020 Cancer Biology & Medicine. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
factor-beta (TGF-β), fibroblast growth factor (FGF), hepat-ocyte growth factor (HGF), epidermal growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)14-19, as well as other soluble
fac-tors, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-12, C-X-C motif chemok-ine 8 (CXCL8), CXCL9, CXCL16, C-C chemokchemok-ine ligand 20 (CCL20), CCL25, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-3 (MCP-3)20-23.
Herein, we provide an overview of recent data suggesting that the pro-tumorigenic effects of MSCs as well as MSC-derived cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are the con-sequence of a process of cell reprogramming driven by the tumor microenvironment. We also discuss the emerging reports suggesting approaches to reprogram these cells to mediate anti-tumor effects in vivo, as well as data supporting the existence of stromal cells restraining cancer growth in the tumor microenvironment.
Pro-tumorigenic effects of stromal
cells
Immune abnormalities
Immunosuppression
It is well established that MSCs are major drivers of the typ-ical immunomodulation observed in a solid tumor microen-vironment. For instance, a recent study using MSCs expanded from BM and prostate cancer tissue from independent donors showed that tumor-infiltrating MSCs are major drivers of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer24. The authors reported the ability of prostate cancer-
infiltrating MSCs to suppress T-cell proliferation through immunosuppressive properties comparable to canonical BM-derived MSCs. The suppression of proliferation medi-ated by prostate cancer-infiltrating MSCs was dose-depend-ent, and the expressions of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death ligand 2 (PD-L2) were upregulated on T cells in the presence of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)24. In another study,
the transcriptome analysis of MSCs from multiple myeloma (MM) patients revealed constitutive abnormalities in immune system activation, cell cycle progression, and osteoblastogene-sis that were maintained even in the absence of tumors cells, thus strongly suggesting that MSCs may contribute to the immune evasion and bone lesions frequently found in MM25.
MSCs shape the myelodysplastic syndrome microenvironment at least in part by inducing suppressive monocytes dampening natural killer (NK) cell function26. Moreover, MSCs
partici-pate in oral mucosa carcinogenesis by increasing immuno-suppressive functions on T-cell proliferation; tumorigenesis of tumor- resident MSCs correlated with higher expression of cellular proliferative status indicator Ki6727. Interestingly and
on the same hand, the CXCL8 supporting the survival and proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) signaling pathway in the affected BM microenvironment would be mainly secreted by MSCs28.
Cellular senescence
The normal aging process and various age-related diseases, including some cancers, are marked by a chronic low-grade inflammation (“inflammaging”) and cellular senescence (“immunosenescence”). The role of MSC immuno modulation in shaping a senescent microenvironment in a broad spec-trum of human malignancies, especially tumorigenesis, has been documented extensively29,30. For instance, gastric cancer
cell-derived exosomes (extracellular vesicles) affect the immu-nomodulatory functions of MSCs by activating the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathway, which in turn mediates support to tumor growth by maintaining the inflam-matory environment and enhancing the ability of MSCs to activate immune cells31. AML blasts induce a
senescence-asso-ciated secretory phenotype (SASP) in BM stromal cells through a p16INK4a-dependent mechanism, which encompasses the irreversible arrest of cell proliferation and the secretion of a set of chemokines, proinflammatory cytokines, and growth factors32. Similarly, some authors reported the alteration of
cellular and immune-related properties of BM-derived MSCs (BM-MSCs) and macrophages through the release of exosomes from K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cell line; exosome con-centration in BM-MSCs correlated with the enhanced expres-sion of Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), wnt5a, CXCL12, IL-6, TGF-β, and TNF-α33. Furthermore, senescent breast
luminal cells promoted carcinogenesis by activating CAFs through the inflammatory cytokine IL-834. BM stromal cells
from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome display a senes-cence phenotype induced by S100A9-induced Toll-like recep-tor 4 (TLR4), NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activation, and IL-1β secretion35. TLR4
signa-ling was also reported to drive MSC commitment to promote tumor microenvironment transformation in MM36.
Cancer-associated metabolic changes
Various authors have reported the involvement of micro-environmental stromal cells in cancer-associated metabolic changes supporting tumorigenic processes. Adaptive meta-bolic plasticity, i.e., tumor-initiating cell ability to switch between oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis, depending on reactive oxygen species, hypoxia, and glucose availability in the tumor microenvironment, confers a survival advantage to malignant cells in breast cancer, thus representing a poten-tial target for anti-cancer therapy37. Notably, the
overexpres-sion of O-GlcNAc transferase (OGT), an enzyme involved in tumor-initiating cell-mediated rewiring of energy metabolism, increases CSC populations and mammosphere formation
in vitro and in vivo. The pharmacological or genetic
inhibi-tion of OGT induces a potent reducinhibi-tion of mammosphere formation, as well as CD44H/CD24L, ALDH+, and NANOG+ tumor-initiating cell populations in breast cancer cells38.
These observations confirm that the inhibition of adaptive metabolic plasticity may serve as a therapeutic strategy to reg-ulate tumor-initiating activity in breast cancer.
Similarly, pancreatic cancer cells utilize “metabolic reprogram-ming”, through the enhancement of glycolysis with increased lactate production and glycolytic enzyme over expression, to satisfy their energy demand and support malignant behaviors, despite a hypoxic and nutrient-deficient microenvironment39.
A study in bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma suggested that chemoresistance in cancer cells inside the hypoxic microenvi-ronment occurs through: (i) metabolic reprogramming, with suppressed oxidative phosphorylation and upregulated glycol-ysis; (ii) perivascular invasiveness along remaining blood vessels in a VEGF- and neo-angiogenesis-independent manner; and (iii) enrichment of tumor-initiating stem cells residing in the perivascular niche close to residual blood vessels40. In addition,
exosomes from glioma cells induced a tumor-like phenotype in MSCs by activating glycolysis41.
In 2019, a report from Lung and colleagues42 showed that
the expression of estrogen receptor (ER)-α, the target of endo-crine therapies in breast cancer that is expressed by most meta-static breast cancer cells, is regulated by the BM microenviron-ment. In this study, the induction of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mRNA and ER protein downregulation, through a mitogen- activated protein kinase (MAPK)-independent mechanism, was achieved by the treatment of breast cancer cells with conditioned culture media from either cancer-activated BM stromal cells or HS5 BM stromal cell line. In addition, thyroid
hormones, which are well-established pro-tumorigenic players, may stimulate tumor growth and neovascularization in vari-ous solid cancers by activating MSCs through a non-classical integrin αvβ3 signaling43. Moreover, the EGF-like superfamily
member EGFL6, playing an important role during embryonic development without any effect on wound healing, mediates a crosstalk between cancer and stromal cells to induce stem-ness and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) (EMT is an important tumorigenic mechanism where epithelial cells become MSCs by losing their cell polarity and adhesion abil-ity, and gaining migratory and invasive properties) in breast cancer cells in vitro, thus promoting tumor growth in vivo44.
Cancer-promoting CAFs
CAFs play a pivotal role in cancer progression, partially through signaling molecules that may represent potential therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment. For instance, the overexpression of the potential prognostic factor, heat shock factor 1 (HSF1), promotes EMT, proliferation, migration, and invasion in Cal27 cells. The presence of CAFs expressing CD10 and GPR77 corre-lates with poor survival and chemoresistance in lung and breast cancer patients, and these CAFs supported cancer stemness and promoted cancer formation and chemoresistance in patient-de-rived xenografts45. In addition, HSF1 stimulates tumor growth
in nude mice and its expression significantly correlates with poor overall survival and prognosis in patients with oral squa-mous cell carcinoma46. Intracellular Notch1 signaling in CAFs
inversely controls stromal regulation of the stemness and plas-ticity of CSCs in melanoma, acting as a molecular switch mod-ulating tumor heterogeneity and aggressiveness47.
Strong evidence that stromal microenvironment shapes the intratumoral architecture in pancreatic tumors was shown by a study using single-cell RNA, protein analysis, and high-con-tent digital imaging of RNA in situ hybridization to assess the role of stromal CAFs in the modulation of heterogeneity in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) models48. The
authors identified significant single-cell population shifts toward proliferative phenotypes and invasive EMT linked to MAPK and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signaling, which contributed to intratumoral heter-ogeneity in tumor glands and to differences in stromal abun-dance and clinical outcome. Furthermore, a study addressing the ability of mesenchymal HT1080 fibrosarcoma cell line to switch to amoeboid motility (migration plasticity) revealed that pharmacological or RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated
downregulation of the Arp2/3 complex or decrease of adhe-siveness to its substrate induced the transition from a lamel-lipodium-rich to a blebbing phenotype in fibrosarcoma cells, but not in normal subcutaneous fibroblasts49. Interestingly,
still in this study, a significant fraction of fibrosarcoma cells expressing the blebbing phenotype exhibited stem cell-like features, such as increased efflux of Hoechst-33342 and CD133, Oct4, Sox2 and Nanog expression, and demonstrated an increased ability to switch to a bleb-rich amoeboid phe-notype in three-dimensional (3D) collagen gels49.
Stromal cells’ therapeutic potential
in cancer
Damage repair after chemotherapy
Various reports support the therapeutic potential of MSCs in cancer, also for repairing damaged tissues after chemotherapy50,51. For instance, human adipose-derived
MSCs displayed repairing properties in damaged thymus fol-lowing chemotherapy in mouse models of blood cancer52. Mice
showed improvements in the thymic structure and functions, as shown by the proportion of circulating and splenic regula-tory T (Treg) cells and the recovery of T-cell subpopulations.
MSCs slowing tumor progression
In a study involving both human colorectal cancer cells and immunocompetent rat models of colorectal carcinogenesis, the treatment with BM-derived MSCs interfered with colon cancer progression. The effect was partially due to the modulation of the tumor microenvironmental immune effector cells, such as Tregs, CD8+ cells, and NK cells. In addition, there was evidence of Th17 cell activity restoration, macrophage reprogramming into regulatory cells performing phagocytosis with reduced pro-duction of proinflammatory cytokines, a 50% decrease in the infiltration rate of CD68+ cells, and a two-fold increase of CD3+ cells53. Two microRNAs, i.e., small non-coding RNA
mole-cules silencing post-transcriptional regulation of gene expres-sion, associated with the capacity of MSCs to attenuate cancer growth were identified, namely microRNA 150 (miR-150) and miR-7. Similarly, human BM-MSC-derived exosomes overex-pressing miR-34a inhibited glioblastoma development54,55. In
another study, intra-BM but not systemic administration of BM-MSCs from healthy donors reduced tumor burden and
prolonged survival of the leukemia-bearing mice54. In this
study, the MSC senescence observed during disease progression was stopped and the BM microenvironment was restored, with functional recovery of host myelopoiesis and improvement of thrombopoiesis. Moreover, in a bioluminescence imaging study monitoring the effects of human umbilical cord-derived MSCs in mouse hepatoma tumor models with H7402 cell line, the MSC microenvironment effectively inhibited the growth of cancer cells56.
Cancer-restraining CAFs
Different studies, both clinical and in mouse models, suggest that there may exist at least two populations of MSC-derived CAFs, i.e., cancer-promoting CAFs, discussed already, and cancer-restraining CAFs57. However, the identity of cancer-
restraining CAFs remains poorly investigated, due to the lack of markers. Interestingly, a cell subpopulation with tumor inhibitory functions was isolated and characterized in a can-cer metastasis microenvironment by using stromal cell lines derived from the central nervous system (CNS) metastasis of breast and lung cancer patients58. Interestingly, these cells were
quite homogenous, expressed high levels of collagen, and dis-played gene expression signatures of CAFs, MSCs, and EMT58.
Mizutani and colleagues59 reported the
glycosylphosphatidy-linositol-anchored protein Meflin as a potential marker of can-cer-restraining CAFs. These authors observed that the tissue infiltration of Meflin-positive CAFs correlated with a favorable patient outcome in PDA. By contrast, Meflin deficiency or low expression resulted in a markedly faster tumor progression in a PDA mouse model, and either the overexpression of Meflin in CAFs or the delivery of a Meflin-expressing lentivirus into the tumor stroma was sufficient to suppress the growth of xeno-graft tumors59. This new marker paves the way for isolation and
further characterization of CAFs exerting anti-tumoral effects.
Stromal cells follow the program
dictated by their microenvironment
Stromal cells’ programming by tumor
microenvironment
Effects of the tumor microenvironment on stromal
cells
Early studies addressing the composition of the tumor microenvironment reported an atypical cellular and
molecular microenvironment supporting carcinogenesis and chemoresistance60,61. Recently, Coffman and colleagues62
reported that ovarian carcinoma-associated MSCs, which are critical stromal progenitor cells promoting tumor cell growth, cancer stemness, and chemoresistance, arise from a process of tumor-mediated reprogramming of local tissue MSCs. This study also provided strong evidence that tumor- mediated MSC conversion is tissue- and cancer-type dependent, and requires tumor-secreted factors and hypoxia62. Breast tumor
microenvironment transforms naive MSCs into tumor- forming cells in nude mice; in addition, MSCs pre- exposed to a conditioned medium or purified exosomes derived from breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) form a tumor-like mass rich in stromal tissue by 14 weeks when injected into mam-mary glands of nude mice63. Similarly, CCL5 secreted by
classic Hodgkin lymphoma cells recruits MSCs and mono-cytes and enhances MSC proliferation and CCL5 secretion; conditioned medium from these MSCs increases tumor cell growth and monocyte migration64. Exosomes derived
from chronic myeloid leukemia cells altered the cellular and immune-related properties of BM-MSCs and macrophages
in vitro33. Moreover, the expression of gene signatures and
mesenchymal shift in quiescent glioblastoma cells, a source of tumor recurrence in highly malignant glioblastoma, was observed following their interactions with niche micro-environment65. Reciprocal reprogramming of CSCs and
associated MSCs may promote tumor progression in gastric cancer66. Consequently, unraveling the signaling molecules
involved in pro-tumorigenic crosstalks between MSCs and tumor environment may lead to novel targets for inducing cancer regression and elimination.
Interestingly, asporin, a factor secreted by MSCs following cellular interactions within the tumor microenvironment, alters the tumor microenvironment and inhibits MSC dif-ferentiation to drive metastatic progression through CD49d/ CD29 signaling67. MSCs promotes the progression of gastric
cancer cells through the release of CXCL16, which activates STAT3-mediated expression of Ror1 in the cancer cells68.
Dabbah and colleagues reported that microvesicles derived from BM-MSCs of MM patients increase the tumorigenicity of MM cells69. In this study, CD49d and CD29 integrin
over-expression in MM-MSC microvesicles correlated with patient staging and response to treatment; the concomitant inhibition of these molecules resulted in reduced uptake of MM-MSC microvesicles (but not normal donor MSC microvesicles), inhibition of MM cell signaling, expression of aggressiveness markers, and enhanced response to chemotherapy69. This
study also suggested that the reciprocal interactions of malig-nant cells and MSCs in breast cancer microenvironment may result in the transformation of naive MSCs into cells capable of forming explants in nude mice. Notably, pre-metastatic niche in distant organs may be created, at least in part, by the transfer to stromal cells, such as peritoneal mesothelial cells (PMCs), fibroblasts, and endothelial cells, of tumor-derived extracellu-lar vesicles secreted by tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) into the blood70. STAT4 overexpression in gastric cancer cells
makes normal fibroblasts acquire CAF-like features via acti-vating the wnt/β-catenin pathway71. In addition, Guo and
colleagues72 (in 2019) addressed the potential roles and
mech-anisms of long non-coding RNAs in CSC-like properties and EMT in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using Western blot, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reac-tion (RT-PCR), colony formareac-tion, transwell migrareac-tion, and wound healing assays in A549 and H1299 human NSCLC cell lines, L9981 and 95D highly metastatic cell lines, and NL9980 and 95C low-metastatic cell lines. These authors observed that knockdown of long non-coding RNA linc-ITGB1 inhib-ited the expression of various markers of cancer stemness and CSC formation by reducing the expression of the EMT-related transcription factor Snail. Overexpression of Snail reversed the inhibitory effects of linc-ITGB1 knockdown72.
Role of the extracellular matrix
Emerging data strongly suggest that tumor extracellular matrix (ECM) and related factors contribute to the controversial role of stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. For exam-ple, after showing that MM cells, cocultured with BM-MSCs, comodulated the phenotype of MM cells in an MAPKs/trans-lation initiation (TI)-dependent manner, Ibraheem and col-leagues73 reported that even the decellularized ECMECM of
BM-MSCs from MM patients was able to induce comparable pro-tumorigenic effects. A number of changes in microRNAs was shown affecting the MM phenotype and the activation of MAPK/TI, EMT, proliferation, and CXCR4, with a role for BM-MSC secretomes and microvesicles. On the other hand, the decellularized ECM of BM-MSCs from normal donors mediated anti-cancer effects, including a rapid and persistent decrease in MAPK/TI activation, proliferation, cell count, via-bility, migration, and invasion73. These authors also provided
evidence for a synergism between the ECM and microvesicles in the modulation of MM cell response to chemotherapy as well as in the hierarchy and interdependence of MAPKs/TI/autophagy/ phenotype cascade. In addition, extracellular vesicles released by monocytes from chronic myelomonocytic leukemia patients are
sufficient to confer a procoagulant state through a tissue fac-tor-dependent mechanism mediated by MSCs74.
Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) produced by leu-kemia cells facilitates tumor progression via remodeling of the ECM of the BM microenvironment, and MMP-9 deficiency in the BM microenvironment reduces leukemia-initiating cells and prolongs survival of mice with BCR-ABL1-positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL)75. Similarly, senescent
MSCs actively remodel the surrounding ECM to drive breast cancer cells to a more invasive phenotype76. Interestingly, 3D
culture studies with cancer and stromal cells in ECM, incor-porating multiplex quantitative analysis method, may reveal the major signaling molecules and mechanisms driving the pro- and anti-cancer interactions, providing new therapeu-tical targets77,78. Notably, in a recent study using a similar
approach in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cell repopula-tion of cirrhotic scaffolds showed a unique up-regularepopula-tion of genes related to EMT and TGF-β signaling as well as a high concentration of endogenous TGF-β1 in comparison to healthy scaffolds and TGF-β1-induced phosphorylation of canonical proteins Smad2/379. This study characterized the
inherent features of ECM micro-environment from human cirrhotic liver as key pro-carcinogenic components in HCC development. Similarly, MSCs cocultured with colorectal cancer cells showed increased invasiveness and proliferative abilities due to increased TGF-β1 and decreased p53 levels80.
TGF-β1 promoted the migration and invasion of HCT116 and HT29 colorectal cancer cells, and induced the differentia-tion of MSCs into CAFs through a Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT3 signaling-dependent mechanism81. Long-term coculture of
human MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells with normal human MSCs was associated with the formation of 3D tumor sphe-roids in vitro, with a 14-fold enhanced expression of the breast tumor marker urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA)82.
Hypoxia and tumor stiffness
Earlier reports suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) may link hypoxia, inflammation, and cancer83,84. In
addition, recently, stromal cells were reported as mediators of the pro-tumorigenic effects of hypoxia and tumor stiffness, which are known elements of the solid tumor microenviron-ment promoting tumor survival, progression, and metastasis. Osteopontin, a hypoxia-driven phosphorylated glycoprotein, may promote stem cell-like properties and EMT in pancreatic cancer cells by activating the integrin αvβ3-Akt/Erk-forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) signaling in a paracrine manner85.
Microvesicles derived from human BM-MSCs support human osteosarcoma (U2OS) cell growth under hypoxia in vitro and
in vivo through PI3K/AKT and HIF-1α-dependent mecha-nisms86. Similarly, hypoxic BM stromal cells-derived exosomal
miRNAs promote metastasis of lung cancer cells via STAT3-induced EMT in an in vivo mouse syngeneic tumor model87.
Moreover, exosomal miRNAs from hypoxic BM-MSCs pro-moted lung cancer cell metastasis via STAT3-induced EMT88
and hypoxia-conditioned MSCs promote HCC progression through yes-associated protein (YAP)-mediated lipogenesis reprogramming56, further suggesting that targeting the
com-munication between MSC and cancer cells may be a potential target for anti-tumor therapy.
Interactions of cancer cells and stromal cells in a hypoxic microenvironment drive EMT through NOTCH and c-MET signaling, and induce immunosuppressive response within the microenvironment in PDA, a fatal disease with limited response to both immunotherapy and cytotoxic chemoradiotherapy89. A
study addressing the end-stage myeloma cell mobilization from the BM into peripheral blood revealed that hypoxic BM niches, together with a pro-inflammatory microenvironment result-ing from the interactions between tumor cells and BM stromal cells, induce an arrest in proliferation that forces tumor cells to circulate into the peripheral blood to seek other BM niches90.
Hypoxia-induced EMT has been shown with a 17-gene panel aimed at assessing NSCLC prognosis91. Similarly,
hypoxia-in-duced acquisition of CSC features in lung cancer cells occurs through CXCR4 activation92. In addition, the retention factor
in the endoplasmic reticulum (RER1) enhances carcinogen-esis and stemness of pancreatic cancer93. Finally, glioblastoma
stem-like cell (GSC) phenotype, the worst prognostic marker of glioblastoma, persists partially due to the hypoxic microenvi-ronment-dependent release of extracellular adenosine, thus pro-moting cell migration, invasion, and tumor recurrence through the activation of the A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR)94,95.
MSC-derived CAFs were reported as the link between bio-physical forces and pro-metastatic signaling in colon cancer, as they respond to increased stiffness of the tumor micro-environment by the activation of the signaling mediated by TGF-β family members and activin A, a strong pro-metastatic cytokine95. In addition, Saforo and colleagues96 described an in vitro cell culturing system incorporating elements of the in vivo lung environment, including physiological hypoxia
(5% O2) and lung fibroblast-derived ECM. Through this cul-ture system, a rapid expansion of stromal progenitors from patient’s lung tumor resections was achieved; these progenitor
cells retained the secretion of factors associated with cancer progression, the expression of pluripotency markers, and the ability to enhance tumor cell growth and metastasis96.
Adiposity
It is well established that fat tissue overgrowth in obesity pro-motes tumor progression97-99. Su and colleagues100 compared
lean and obese mice grafted with prostate tumors and showed that obesity promotes EMT in cancer cells and tumor invasion into the surrounding fat tissue. In this study, adipose stromal cells induced EMT in prostate cancer cells and made them more migratory and chemo-resistant; by contrast, adipose stro-mal cell targeting suppressed both EMT and chemoresistance to docetaxel, cabazitaxel, and cisplatin chemotherapy in human prostate cancer cells100. Human adipose-derived MSCs
pro-moted EMT in MCF7 breast cancer cells by cross- interacting with the TGF-β/Smad and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, in a coculture system established to investigate the paracrine effects of MSCs on the migration and invasion potential of this aggres-sive breast cancer cell line101. In addition, a study in a xenograft
model of early MM showed that bone niche switching toward a “fatty” marrow supports the development of malignant cells during carcinogenesis. In this study, MSCs mainly gave rise to adipocytes supporting tumor growth by increasing the survival and chemoresistance of malignant cells102.
In addition, interestingly, various adipose-derived factors were reported to play a role in MSC-mediated pro-tumor-igenic effects. For instance, adipokine chemerin is a major player in obesity-mediated support of cancer progression. This cell differentiation promoter and leukocyte chemoat-tractant factor was reported to promote the growth, prolifera-tion migraprolifera-tion, invasion, and metastasis of cancer cells via the recruitment of tumor-associated MSCs and the stimulation of angiogenesis pathways in endothelial cells through chemerin receptor 1 (CMKLR1), chemerin receptor 2 (GPR1), and CCLR2 signaling103.
Reprogramming microenvironment cells for
anti-cancer effects
Early studies addressing the immunological hallmarks of MSCs in the tumor microenvironment revealed various molecular mechanisms through which MSCs modulate the immune response in the cancer microenvironment and indi-cated that it may be possible to convert the microenvironment from immunosuppressive to immunostimulant104,105.
In vitro studies support the anti-tumor effects of MSCs, but
these effects can be markedly reduced in vivo by the tumor-trophic properties of these cells and the direct cell-to-cell inte-gration with tumor stromal elements. A score of recent reports suggests promising strategies for reprogramming micro-environmental cells to mediate only anti-cancer effects. For instance, unlike conditioned medium from human adipose MSCs, eicosapentanoic acid-treated adipose MSCs reduce mRNA levels of the tumor-associated genes FASN, STAT3, and
cIAP-2 in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines,
with marked decreases in their glycolysis, inflammation, and motility in vivo106.
Mandal and colleagues107 proposed the encapsulation
of MSCs from the perinatal tissue with the sodium alginate biomaterial. The team isolated the 3D structure from the microenvironment and observed that the encapsulated MSCs displayed: (i) increased proliferation with expression enhance-ment of pluripotency genes, EMT, immune-modulation, and angiogenesis; (ii) increased secretion of VEGF, TGF-β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10 and IL-6, and IL-3β; (iii) and increased expres-sion of the tumor invaexpres-sion suppressor protein E-cadherin107.
Furthermore, treatment of CSCs derived from MDA-MB-231 and MCF7 breast cancer cell lines with encapsulated MSCs lowered CSC viability and migration, with downregulation of markers related to angiogenesis, EMT and proliferation, and upregulation of Wnt antagonists secreted frizzled-related pro-tein 4 (sFRP4) and DKK1107.
Prolonged culture of heterogeneous prostatic CAFs resulted in a marked decrease in the expression of proliferative endothe-lial cell surface marker endoglin (CD105), as compared to short-culture CAFs, and loss of their tumor expansion potential and heterogeneity in 3D cultures and patient-derived xenograft tissues108. Engineered human placenta-derived MSCs, armed
with a double fusion gene containing the herpes simplex virus truncated thymidine kinase and firefly luciferase, inhibited the tumorigenesis mediated by the HT29 colon cancer cell line in nude mice114. Treatment with 5-azacytidine restored
IL-6-increased production in MSCs from myelodysplastic patients116.
A study addressing the response of human MSCs to low-dose photodynamic therapy revealed that this treatment may increase MSC immunogenicity and promote angiogenic potential117. In this in vitro study, low-dose photodynamic
therapy: (i) induced the reorganization of MSC cytoskeleton, with a decrease in cell motility; (ii) induced the inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3) and the activation of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (Erk1/2)
signaling in MSCs; (iii) significantly upregulated the secre-tion of VEGF-A, IL-8, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), MMP-9, and other proangiogenic factors by MSCs; (iv) dramatically inhibited the secretion of pro-tumorigenic macrophage infiltration marker CCL2 (MCP-1) by MSCs and decreased MSC viability and immunogenicity when cocul-tured with lymphocytes. In another study, MSCs loaded with a photosensitizer successfully shipped these nanoparticles into lung cancer tumor sites, enhancing the effects of photody-namic therapy in vivo110. In addition, irradiated endothelial
cells decreased the malignancy of liver cancer cells in a cocul-ture system using medium conditioned with endothelial cells, thus suggesting that irradiated endothelial cells are key players in the therapeutic effects of radiotherapy115. In addition,
var-ious flavonoids and non-flavonoid polyphenolic compounds from medicinal plants alleviate multidrug resistance in breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer with survival benefits in patients, through their antioxidant capacity, the modulation of inflammatory responses, and the inactivation of oncogenes with the inhibition of survival, angiogenesis, proliferation, and metastasis118 (Table 1).
Some causes of controversies on the
roles of stromal cells in cancer
Cancer cell lines
In numerous reports, it is not clear whether the pro-tumor-igenic rather than anti-cancer role of MSCs is dictated by a cell line-specific event. In a coculture study with bladder cancer cells displaying stem cell-like properties (CD133+) and adipose- derived MSCs, the latter cells produced soluble mediators that: (i) increased the phosphorylation of mole-cules involved in cancer progression and drug resistance, such as p70 S6K, ERK1/2, and AKT1/2/3 in CD133+ cells from 5637 cell line; but also (ii) decreased the phosphorylation of those PI3K/Akt and MAPK signaling molecules in CD133+ cells from HB-CLS-1 cell line119. MSCs in fact induced pro-
tumorigenic effects in the presence of 5637 bladder cancer cell line and anti-cancer effects in the presence of HB-CLS-1 blad-der cancer cell line, and thus the effect of crosstalk between MSCs and bladder cancer cells remains unclear. Similarly, in a study assessing how breast cancer cells from different stages of the metastatic cascade convert MSCs into tumor-associated MSCs, only MDA-MB-231 breast cancer secretomes, but not
MCF-7 cells and sublines isolated from bone, lung, and brain metastases, converted MSCs into tumor-associated MSCs in bioengineered 3D microenvironments120. Altogether, these
findings suggest that MSCs from the tumor microenviron-ment are pre-conditioned to mediate pro-tumorigenic effects on cancer cells, and that impeding this pre-conditioning or re-conditioning MSCs may warrant anti-cancer effects in the tumor microenvironment (Figure 1).
In vitro vs. in vivo and MSC origin
Experimental evidence supports the idea that stromal cell effects and origin may explain the discrepancies amongst data from in vitro and in vivo studies. Quach and colleagues121
reported that while the inhibition of the glypican-1 (GPC-1)
Table 1 Methods proposed for reprogramming the tumor
microenvironment Cancer type/ model
Methods References
Breast cancer Treatment of MSCs with eicosapentanoic acid
106
Encapsulation of MSCs with sodium alginate
107
Prostate cancer Extended passaging of CAFs 108
Elimination of tumor immunosuppressive cells with chimeric protein IL2-R336A
109
Lung cancer MSCs loading with the photosensitizer MnO2@Ce6 110 MSCs loading with nanoparticles 111 Hepatocellular
carcinoma MSCs carrying an adenovirus
112
Treatment of MSCs with
melatonin
113
Colon cancer MSCs arming with a double fusion gene containing the herpes simplex virus truncated thymidine kinase and firefly luciferase
114
Liver cancer Irradiation of endothelial cells 115
Neuroblastoma Autologous MSCs carrying an oncolytic adenovirus
75
Myelodysplastic
syndrome Treatment of MSCs with 5-azacytidine
prostate cancer biomarker decreases cell growth and migra-tion in vitro of the aggressive prostate cancer cell line PC-3, quite surprisingly it increases the PC-3 tumor size in NCr nude mice xenografts. Also surprisingly, it increases cancer cell proliferation and migration in aggressive prostate cancer cell line DU-145 cells, suggesting that GPC-1 accounts for among the factors that drive a cell line-dependent response to stro-mal cells. In addition, in the same study, the decreased cell growth observed in GPC-1 knockdown PC-3 cells was rescued by coculturing the cells with MSCs and CAFs. Further, treat-ment of these stromal cells with tumor-conditioned media from PC-3 cells transfected with GPC-1 short hairpin RNA (shRNA) increased the expression of ECM components, endo-crine and paraendo-crine biomolecules, and migration markers121.
Moreover, despite in vivo observations suggesting the ability of this signaling pathway to induce drug resistance and influ-ence the ability to form metastasis via induction of EMT in pancreatic cancer, the activation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)/IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) signaling by stromal cells failed to induce EMT in cultures with MiaPaCa-2, AsPC-1, Capan-2, BxPC-3, and Panc1 pancreatic cancer cell lines122.
Considering that MSCs promoted anti-cancer effects in most reports, as discussed in the Cancer-restraining CAFs section, surprisingly, treatment of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells with medium containing extracellu-lar vesicles promoted the in vitro proliferation and migration of cancer cells through ERK signaling123. We hypothesize that
these effects may be due to differences in the origin of MSCs, as in this study human umbilical cord MSCs, and not BM or adipose-derived MSCs were used. As a further support of this hypothesis, a comparative study of subcutaneous and visceral
adipose-derived MSCs revealed various functional similarities and differences, despite similar surface markers124. Notably,
visceral MSCs secreted higher levels of inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) and had a more active sonic hedgehog pathway than subcutaneous MSCs. Fetal and adult lung MSCs possess lung-specific properties, unlike BM-MSCs22. However,
a study profiling the transcriptomes of 361 single MSCs derived from two umbilical cords (UC-MSCs), harvested at different passages and stimulated with or without inflamma-tory cytokines, revealed that UC-MSCs are a well-organized population with limited heterogeneity, as compared to other MSC types125.
Conclusions
The available data clearly support that stromal cells normally have anti-cancer effects, and that reprogramming by cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment induces their switch to pro-tumorigenic activities, thus suggesting that targeting the tumor microenvironment could be a promising therapeutic strategy in cancer. A growing number of reports suggest the possibility to reprogram stromal cells to maintain or revert back to anti-cancer effects. Interestingly, cancer- restraining stromal cells have been identified in the microenvironment, and a marker was reported. Future studies characterizing the origin of these cells may provide clues to how they can be exploited for anti-cancer therapy. The emerging data shed light on the origin of previous controversies on the roles of stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Notably, MSCs have varying effects on cancer cell lines of different ori-gins, and MSCs from different origins have different effects
Programming by tumorigenic factors A B C Mainly pro-tumorigenic Immunosuppression Cancer-restraining CAFs Anti-cancer effects
In vitro vs. in vivo experiments
Cancer cell line differences Experimental models Stromal cells’ origin
Tissue repair
MSCs slowing tumor progression Celluar senescence
Cancer adaptive metabolic plasticity Chronic low-grade inflammation
Stromal cells Therapeutic reprogramming Stromal cells
Small populations with anti-cancer effects
Causes of controversies on stromal cells’ roles and potential in cancer: + Hypoxia and tumor stiffness
+ Adiposity, etc.
Tumor microenvironment
Figure 1 Summary of pro-tumorigenic (A) and therapeutic potential (B) of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and causes of controversies
on cancer cell cocultures. On the other hand, the tumor microenvironment induces complex signals that affect how stromal and cancer cells respond to soluble factors in vitro and in vivo. These discrepancies should be taken into account in the design of future studies and interpretation of results.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the collaborators of their respective institu-tions for the comments on the manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed.
References
1. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006; 8: 315-7. 2. Nwabo Kamdje AH, Mosna F, Bifari F, Lisi V, Bassi G, Malpeli G,
et al. Notch-3 and Notch-4 signaling rescue from apoptosis human B-ALL cells in contact with human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2011; 118: 380-9.
3. Cislo-Pakuluk A, Marycz K. A promising tool in retina regeneration: current perspectives and challenges when using mesenchymal progenitor stem cells in veterinary and human ophthalmological applications. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2017; 13: 598-602.
4. Luo Y, Kishi S, Sasaki T, Ohmori H, Fujiwara-Tani R, Mori S, et al. Targeting claudin-4 enhances chemosensitivity in breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2020; 111: 1840-50.
5. Oswald J, Boxberger S, Jørgensen B, Feldmann S, Ehninger G, Bornhäuser M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells can be differentiated into endothelial cells in vitro. Stem Cells. 2004; 22: 377-84. 6. Xuan W, Khan M, Ashraf M. Extracellular vesicles from notch
activated cardiac mesenchymal stem cells promote myocyte proliferation and neovasculogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 8: 11. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ fcell.2020.00011/full.
7. Atiya H, Frisbie L, Pressimone C, Coffman L. Mesenchymal stem cells in the tumor microenvironment. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020; 1234: 31-42.
8. Osman A, Afify SM, Hassan G, Fu X, Seno A, Seno M. Revisiting cancer stem cells as the origin of cancer-associated cells in the tumor microenvironment: a hypothetical view from the potential of iPSCs. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12: 879.
9. Nwabo Kamdje AH, Seke Etet PF, Vecchio L, Muller JM, Krampera M, Lukong KE. Signaling pathways in breast cancer: therapeutic targeting of the microenvironment. Cell Signal. 2014; 26: 2843-56.
10. Seke Etet PF, Vecchio L, Bogne KP, Nukenine NE, Krampera M, Nwabo Kamdje AH. Normal hematopoiesis and hematologic malignancies: role of canonical Wnt signaling pathway and stromal microenvironment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012; 1835: 1-10. 11. Barberini DJ, Freitas NPP, Magnoni MS, Maia L, Listoni AJ,
Heckler MC, et al. Equine mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, adipose tissue and umbilical cord: immunophenotypic characterization and differentiation potential. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014; 5: 25.
12. Li C, Wu X, Tong J, Yang X, Zhao J, Zheng Q, et al. Comparative analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow and adipose tissue under xeno-free conditions for cell therapy. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015; 6: 55.
13. Ying C, Zhi-bo H, Fang-yun X, You-wei W, Xiao-ming F, Fang C, et al. Adipogenic potentials of mesenchymal stem cells from human bone marrow, umbilical cord and adipose tissue are different. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2014; 22: 588-94. 14. Diangeng L, Nan W, Li Z, Zhu H, Bai X, Bo F, et al. Mesenchymal
stem cells protect podocytes from apoptosis induced by high glucose via secretion of epithelial growth factor. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2013; 4: 103.
15. Ishiki Y, Ohnishi H, Muto Y, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T. Direct evidence that hepatocyte growth factor is a hepatotrophic factor for liver regeneration and has a potent antihepatitis effect in vivo. Hepatology. 1992; 16: 1227-35.
16. Liu X, Chen H, Zhu W, Chen H, Hu X, Jiang Z, et al. Transplantation of SIRT1-engineered aged mesenchymal stem cells improves cardiac function in a rat myocardial infarction model. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014; 33: 1083-92.
17. Nan W, Rui Z, Shui-jing W, Chun-ling Z, Li-bin M, Chun-yu Z, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor stimulates endothelial differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells via Rho/myocardin-related transcription factor–a signaling pathway. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2013; 45: 1447-56.
18. Sesia SB, Duhr R, Medeiros da Cunha C, Todorov A, Schaeren S, Padovan E, et al. Anti-inflammatory/tissue repair macrophages enhance the cartilage-forming capacity of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. J Cell Physiol. 2015; 230: 1258-69.
19. Windmolders S, De Boeck A, Koninckx R, Daniëls A, De Wever O, Bracke M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell secreted platelet derived growth factor exerts a pro-migratory effect on resident Cardiac Atrial appendage Stem Cells. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2014; 66: 177-88.
20. Gyukity-Sebestyén E, Harmati M, Dobra G, Németh IB, Mihály J, Zvara Á, et al. Melanoma-derived exosomes induce PD-1 overexpression and tumor progression via mesenchymal stem cell oncogenic reprogramming. Front Immunol. 2019; 10: 2459. 21. Özdemir RBÖ, Özdemir AT, Sarıboyacı AE, Uysal O, Tuğlu Mİ,
Kırmaz C. The investigation of immunomodulatory effects of adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cell educated macrophages on the CD4 T cells. Immunobiology. 2019; 224: 585-94.
22. Rolandsson Enes S, Andersson Sjöland A, Skog I, Hansson L, Larsson H, Le Blanc K, et al. MSC from fetal and adult lungs
possess lung-specific properties compared to bone marrow-derived MSC. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 29160.
23. Tsiklauri L, Werner J, Kampschulte M, Frommer KW, Berninger L, Irrgang M, et al. Visfatin alters the cytokine and
matrix-degrading enzyme profile during osteogenic and adipogenic MSC differentiation. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2018; 26: 1225-35.
24. Krueger TE, Thorek DLJ, Meeker AK, Isaacs JT, Brennen WN. Tumor-infiltrating mesenchymal stem cells: drivers of the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment in prostate cancer? Prostate. 2019; 79: 320-30.
25. Fernando RC, Mazzotti DR, Azevedo H, Sandes AF, Rizzatti EG, de Oliveira MB, et al. Transcriptome analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from multiple myeloma patients reveals downregulation of genes involved in cell cycle progression, immune response, and bone metabolism. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 1056.
26. Sarhan D, Wang J, Arvindam US, Hallstrom C, Verneris MR, Grzywacz B, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells shape the MDS microenvironment by inducing suppressive monocytes that dampen NK cell function. JCI Insight. 2020; 5: e130155. Available at: https://insight.jci.org/articles/view/130155.
27. Yichen C, Xi W, Juan F, Jingjing S, Da M, Liqun L, et al.
Mesenchymal stem cells participate in oral mucosa carcinogenesis by regulating T cell proliferation. Clin Immunol. 2018; 198: 46-53. 28. Cheng J, Li Y, Liu S, Jiang Y, Ma J, Wan L, et al. CXCL8 derived from
mesenchymal stromal cells supports survival and proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia cells through the PI3K/AKT pathway. FASEB J. 2019; 33: 4755-64.
29. Salminen A, Kaarniranta K, Kauppinen A. ER stress activates immunosuppressive network: implications for aging and Alzheimer’s disease. J Mol Med (Berl). 2020; 98: 633-50.
30. Thomas R, Wang W, Su D-M. Contributions of age-related thymic involution to immunosenescence and inflammaging. Immun Ageing. 2020; 17: 2.
31. Shen Y, Xue C, Li X, Ba L, Gu J, Sun Z, et al. Effects of gastric cancer cell-derived exosomes on the immune regulation of mesenchymal stem cells by the NF-kB signaling pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 2019; 28: 464-76.
32. Abdul-Aziz AM, Sun Y, Hellmich C, Marlein CR, Mistry J, Forde E, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia induces protumoral p16INK4a-driven senescence in the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2019; 133: 446-56.
33. Jafarzadeh N, Safari Z, Pornour M, Amirizadeh N, Forouzandeh Moghadam M, Sadeghizadeh M. Alteration of cellular and immune-related properties of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and macrophages by K562 chronic myeloid leukemia cell derived exosomes. J Cell Physiol. 2019; 234: 3697-710. 34. Al-Khalaf HH, Ghebeh H, Inass R, Aboussekhra A. Senescent
breast luminal cells promote carcinogenesis through interleukin-8-dependent activation of stromal fibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 39: e00359-18. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC6321881/.
35. Shi L, Zhao Y, Fei C, Guo J, Jia Y, Wu D, et al. Cellular senescence induced by S100A9 in mesenchymal stromal cells through
NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Aging (Albany NY). 2019; 11: 9626-42.
36. Giallongo C, Tibullo D, Camiolo G, Parrinello NL, Romano A, Puglisi F, et al. Correction: TLR4 signaling drives mesenchymal stromal cells commitment to promote tumor microenvironment transformation in multiple myeloma. Cell Death Dis. 2019; 10: 820. 37. Walsh HR, Cruickshank BM, Brown JM, Marcato P. The flick
of a switch: conferring survival advantage to breast cancer stem cells through metabolic plasticity. Front Oncol. 2019; 9: 753. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ fonc.2019.00753/full.
38. Akella NM, Minh GL, Ciraku L, Mukherjee A, Bacigalupa ZA, Mukhopadhyay D, et al. O-GlcNAc transferase regulates cancer stem-like potential of breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2020; 18: 585-98.
39. Yang J, Ren B, Yang G, Wang H, Chen G, You L, et al. The enhancement of glycolysis regulates pancreatic cancer metastasis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020; 77: 305-21.
40. Chandra A, Jahangiri A, Chen W, Nguyen AT, Yagnik G, Pereira MP, et al. Clonal ZEB1-driven mesenchymal transition promotes targetable oncologic anti-angiogenic therapy resistance. Cancer Res. 2020; 80: 1498-511. Available at: https://cancerres.aacrjournals. org/content/early/2020/02/08/0008-5472.CAN-19-1305.
41. Ma Z, Cui X, Lu L, Chen G, Yang Y, Hu Y, et al. Exosomes from glioma cells induce a tumor-like phenotype in mesenchymal stem cells by activating glycolysis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019; 10: 60. 42. Lung DK, Warrick JW, Hematti P, Callander NS, Mark CJ,
Miyamoto S, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells transcriptionally repress ESR1 but cannot overcome constitutive ESR1 mutant activity. Endocrinology. 2019; 160: 2427-40.
43. Schmohl KA, Mueller AM, Dohmann M, Spellerberg R, Urnauer S, Schwenk N, et al. Integrin αvβ3-mediated effects of thyroid hormones on mesenchymal stem cells in tumor angiogenesis. Thyroid. 2019; 29: 1843-57.
44. An J, Du Y, Fan X, Wang Y, Ivan C, Zhang XG, et al. EGFL6 promotes breast cancer by simultaneously enhancing cancer cell metastasis and stimulating tumor angiogenesis. Oncogene. 2019; 38: 2123-34.
45. Su S, Chen J, Yao H, Liu J, Yu S, Lao L, et al. CD10+GPR77+ cancer-associated fibroblasts promote cancer formation and chemoresistance by sustaining cancer stemness. Cell. 2018; 172: 841-56.e16.
46. Qiong W, Yu-Chao Z, Li-Fan Z, Pan L, Yu M, Wei-Li S, et al. Heat shock factor 1 in cancer-associated fibroblasts is a potential prognostic factor and drives progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2019; 110: 1790-803.
47. Du Y, Shao H, Moller M, Prokupets R, Tse YT, Liu Z. Intracellular Notch1 signaling in cancer-associated fibroblasts dictates the plasticity and stemness of melanoma stem/initiating cells. Stem Cells. 2019; 37: 865-75.
48. Ligorio M, Sil S, Malagon-Lopez J, Nieman LT, Misale S, Di Pilato M, et al. Stromal microenvironment shapes the intratumoral architecture of pancreatic cancer. Cell. 2019; 178: 160-175.e27.
49. Chikina AS, Rubtsova SN, Lomakina ME, Potashnikova DM, Vorobjev IA, Alexandrova AY. Transition from mesenchymal to bleb-based motility is predominantly exhibited by CD133-positive subpopulation of fibrosarcoma cells. Biol Cell. 2019; 111: 245-61. 50. Baghban R, Roshangar L, Jahanban-Esfahlan R, Seidi K,
Ebrahimi-Kalan A, Jaymand M, et al. Tumor microenvironment complexity and therapeutic implications at a glance. Cell Commun Signal. 2020; 18: 59.
51. Bussard KM, Mutkus L, Stumpf K, Gomez-Manzano C, Marini FC. Tumor-associated stromal cells as key contributors to the tumor microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res. 2016; 18. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4982339/. 52. Zhan Y, Wang L, Liu G, Zhang X, Yang J, Pan Y, et al. The reparative
effects of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in the chemotherapy-damaged thymus. Stem Cells Dev. 2018; 28: 186-95. 53. François S, Usunier B, Forgue-Lafitte M-E, L’Homme B, Benderitter
M, Douay L, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell administration attenuates colon cancer progression by modulating the immune component within the colorectal tumor microenvironment. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2019; 8: 285-300.
54. Wang B, Wu ZH, Lou PY, Chai C, Han SY, Ning JF, et al. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell-secreted exosomes overexpressing microRNA-34a ameliorate glioblastoma development via down-regulating MYCN. Cell Oncol. 2019; 42: 783-99.
55. Xia C, Wang T, Cheng H, Dong Y, Weng Q, Sun G, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress leukemia via macrophage-mediated functional restoration of bone marrow
microenvironment. Leukemia. 2020; 1-9: 2375-83.
56. Liu Y, Ren H, Zhou Y, Shang L, Zhang Y, Yang F, et al. The hypoxia conditioned mesenchymal stem cells promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression through YAP mediated lipogenesis reprogramming. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 38: 228. 57. Bu L, Baba H, Yoshida N, Miyake K, Yasuda T, Uchihara T, et al.
Biological heterogeneity and versatility of cancer-associated fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Oncogene. 2019; 38: 4887-901.
58. Tew BY, Legendre C, Gooden GC, Johnson KN, Martinez RA, Kiefer J, et al. Isolation and characterization of patient-derived CNS metastasis-associated stromal cell lines. Oncogene. 2019; 38: 4002-14.
59. Mizutani Y, Kobayashi H, Iida T, Asai N, Masamune A, Hara A, et al. Meflin-positive cancer-associated fibroblasts inhibit pancreatic carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2019; 79: 5367-81. 60. García-Hernández M de la L, Uribe-Uribe NO, Espinosa-González
R, Kast WM, Khader SA, Rangel-Moreno J. A unique cellular and molecular microenvironment is present in tertiary lymphoid organs of patients with spontaneous prostate cancer regression. Front Immunol. 2017; 8: 563. Available at: https://www.frontiersin. org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00563/full.
61. Pelizzo G, Veschi V, Mantelli M, Croce S, Benedetto VD, D’Angelo P, et al. Microenvironment in neuroblastoma: isolation and characterization of tumor-derived mesenchymal stromal cells. BMC Cancer. 2018; 18: 1176. Available at: https://moh-it.
pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/microenvironment-in-neuroblastoma-isolation-and-characterization.
62. Coffman LG, Pearson AT, Frisbie LG, Freeman Z, Christie E, Bowtell DD, et al. Ovarian carcinoma-associated mesenchymal stem cells arise from tissue-specific normal stroma. Stem Cells. 2018; 37: 257-69.
63. Wörner PM, Schächtele DJ, Barabadi Z, Srivastav S, Chandrasekar B, Izadpanah R, et al. Breast tumor microenvironment can transform naive mesenchymal stem cells into tumor-forming cells in nude mice. Stem Cells Dev. 2018; 28: 341-52.
64. Casagrande N, Borghese C, Visser L, Mongiat M, Colombatti A, Aldinucci D. CCR5 antagonism by maraviroc inhibits Hodgkin lymphoma microenvironment interactions and xenograft growth. Haematologica. 2019; 104: 564-75.
65. Rut T, Yong H, Igor K, Michael K, Jung-Yi L, Jessica T-G, et al. Gene signatures of quiescent glioblastoma cells reveal mesenchymal shift and interactions with niche microenvironment. EBioMedicine. 2019; 42: 252-69.
66. Yeela S, Dalia CA, Zohar Y, Karl S, Maty T. Reciprocal
reprogramming of cancer cells and associated mesenchymal stem cells in gastric cancer. Stem Cells. 2018; 37: 176-89.
67. Hughes RM, Simons BW, Khan H, Miller R, Kugler V, Torquato S, et al. Asporin restricts mesenchymal stromal cell differentiation, alters the tumor microenvironment, and drives metastatic progression. Cancer Res. 2019; 79: 3636-50.
68. Ikeda T, Nishita M, Hoshi K, Honda T, Kakeji Y, Minami Y. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived CXCL16 promotes progression of gastric cancer cells by STAT3-mediated expression of Ror1. Cancer Sci. 2020; 111: 1254-65.
69. Dabbah M, Jarchowsky-Dolberg O, Attar-Schneider O, Tartakover Matalon S, Pasmanik-Chor M, Drucker L, et al. Multiple myeloma BM-MSCs increase the tumorigenicity of MM cells via transfer of VLA4-enriched microvesicles. Carcinogenesis. 2020; 41: 100-10.
70. Umakoshi M, Takahashi S, Itoh G, Kuriyama S, Sasaki Y, Yanagihara K, et al. Macrophage-mediated transfer of cancer-derived components to stromal cells contributes to establishment of a pro-tumor microenvironment. Oncogene. 2019; 38: 2162-76. 71. Yongchun Z, Jian-Hong Z, Fu-Sheng G, Jun X. MiR-141-3p
suppresses gastric cancer induced transition of normal fibroblast and BMSC to cancer-associated fibroblasts via targeting STAT4. Exp Mol Pathol. 2018; 107: 85-94.
72. Guo L, Sun C, Xu S, Xu Y, Dong Q, Zhang L, et al. Knockdown of long non-coding RNA linc-ITGB1 inhibits cancer stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by reducing the expression of Snail in non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. 2019; 10: 128-36.
73. Ibraheem A, Attar-Schneider O, Dabbah M, Jarchowsky OD, Matalon ST, Lishner M, et al. BM-MSCs-derived ECM modifies multiple myeloma phenotype and drug response in a source-dependent manner. Transl Res. 2019; 207: 83-95.
74. Zannoni J, Mauz N, Seyve L, Meunier M, Pernet-Gallay K, Brault J, et al. Tumor microenvironment and clonal monocytes from
chronic myelomonocytic leukemia induce a procoagulant climate. Blood Adv. 2019; 3: 1868-80.
75. Verma D, Zanetti C, Godavarthy PS, Kumar R, Minciacchi VR, Pfeiffer J, et al. Bone marrow niche-derived extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes influence the progression of B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2020; 34: 1540-52.
76. Ghosh D, Mejia Pena C, Quach N, Xuan B, Lee AH, Dawson MR. Senescent mesenchymal stem cells remodel extracellular matrix driving breast cancer cells to a more-invasive phenotype. J Cell Sci. 2020; 133: jcs232470.
77. Hwang HJ, Oh M-S, Lee DW, Kuh H-J. Multiplex quantitative analysis of stroma-mediated cancer cell invasion, matrix remodeling, and drug response in a 3D co-culture model of pancreatic tumor spheroids and stellate cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 38: 258. 78. Maliszewska-Olejniczak K, Brodaczewska KK, Bielecka ZF, Solarek
W, Kornakiewicz A, Szczylik C, et al. Development of extracellular matrix supported 3D culture of renal cancer cells and renal cancer stem cells. Cytotechnology. 2019; 71: 149-63.
79. Mazza G, Telese A, Al-Akkad W, Frenguelli L, Levi A, Marrali M, et al. Cirrhotic human liver extracellular matrix 3D scaffolds promote smad-dependent TGF-β1 epithelial mesenchymal transition. Cells. 2020; 9: 83.
80. Oh I-R, Raymundo B, Kim M, Kim C-W. Mesenchymal stem cells co-cultured with colorectal cancer cells showed increased invasive and proliferative abilities due to its altered p53/TGF-β1 levels. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2020; 84: 256-67.
81. Tan H-X, Cao Z-B, He T-T, Huang T, Xiang C-L, Liu Y. TGFβ1 is essential for MSCs-CAFs differentiation and promotes HCT116 cells migration and invasion via JAK/STAT3 signaling. Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12: 5323-34.
82. Melzer C, von der Ohe J, Otterbein H, Ungefroren H, Hass R. Changes in uPA, PAI-1, and TGF-β production during breast cancer cell interaction with human mesenchymal stroma/stem-like cells (MSC). Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2019; 20: 2630. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6600334/. 83. Balamurugan K. HIF-1 at the crossroads of hypoxia, inflammation,
and cancer. Int J Cancer. 2016; 138: 1058-66.
84. Shi Y, Wang Y, Li Q, Liu K, Hou J, Shao C, et al. Immunoregulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem and stromal cells in
inflammatory diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018; 14: 493-507. 85. Cao J, Li J, Sun L, Qin T, Xiao Y, Chen K, et al. Hypoxia-driven
paracrine osteopontin/integrin αvβ3 signaling promotes pancreatic cancer cell epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell-like properties by modulating forkhead box protein M1. Mol Oncol. 2019; 13: 228-45.
86. Lin S, Zhu B, Huang G, Zeng Q, Wang C. Microvesicles derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote U2OS cell growth under hypoxia: the role of PI3K/AKT and HIF-1α. Human Cell. 2019; 32: 64-74.
87. Li-Na Z, Ying-Hui H, Lei Z. Fusion of macrophages promotes breast cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion through activating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2019; 676: 108137.
88. Zhang X, Sai B, Wang F, Wang L, Wang Y, Zheng L, et al. Hypoxic BMSC-derived exosomal miRNAs promote metastasis of lung cancer cells via STAT3-induced EMT. Mol Cancer. 2019; 18: 40. 89. Daniel SK, Sullivan KM, Labadie KP, Pillarisetty VG. Hypoxia as
a barrier to immunotherapy in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Clin Transl Med. 2019; 8: 10.
90. Garcés J-J, Simicek M, Vicari M, Brozova L, Burgos L, Bezdekova R, et al. Transcriptional profiling of circulating tumor cells in multiple myeloma: a new model to understand disease dissemination. Leukemia. 2020; 34: 589-603.
91. Yue-Lei C, Yihe Z, Junwen W, Na C, Weiying F, Jianing Z, et al. A 17 gene panel for non-small-cell lung cancer prognosis identified through integrative epigenomic-transcriptomic analyses of hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Mol Oncol. 2019; 13: 1490-502.
92. Kang N, Choi SY, Kim BN, Yeo CD, Park CK, Kim YK, et al. Hypoxia-induced cancer stemness acquisition is associated with CXCR4 activation by its aberrant promoter demethylation. BMC Cancer. 2019; 19: 148. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pmc/articles/PMC6375212/.
93. Chen S, Zhang J, Chen J, Wang Y, Zhou S, Huang L, et al. RER1 enhances carcinogenesis and stemness of pancreatic cancer under hypoxic environment. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 38: 15.
94. Torres Á, Erices JI, Sanchez F, Ehrenfeld P, Turchi L, Virolle T, et al. Extracellular adenosine promotes cell migration/invasion of Glioblastoma Stem-like Cells through A3 Adenosine Receptor activation under hypoxia. Cancer Lett. 2019; 446: 112-22.
95. Bauer J, Emon MAB, Staudacher JJ, Thomas AL, Zessner-Spitzenberg J, Mancinelli G, et al. Increased stiffness of the tumor microenvironment in colon cancer stimulates cancer associated fibroblast-mediated prometastatic activin A signaling. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 50.
96. Saforo D, Omer L, Smolenkov A, Barve A, Casson L, Boyd N, et al. Primary lung cancer samples cultured under microenvironment-mimetic conditions enrich for mesenchymal stem-like cells that promote metastasis. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 4177.
97. Iyengar NM, Gucalp A, Dannenberg AJ, Hudis CA. Obesity and cancer mechanisms: tumor microenvironment and inflammation. J Clin Oncol. 2016; 34: 4270-6.
98. Park J, Morley TS, Kim M, Clegg DJ, Scherer PE. Obesity and cancer mechanisms underlying tumour progression and recurrence. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014; 10: 455-65.
99. Quail DF, Dannenberg AJ. The obese adipose tissue micro-environment in cancer development and progression. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2019; 15: 139-54.
100. Su F, Ahn S, Saha A, DiGiovanni J, Kolonin MG. Adipose stromal cell targeting suppresses prostate cancer epithelial-mesenchymal transition and chemoresistance. Oncogene. 2019; 38: 1979-88.
101. Wu S, Wang Y, Yuan Z, Wang S, Du H, Liu X, et al. Human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote breast cancer MCF7 cell
epithelial-mesenchymal transition by cross interacting with the TGF-β/Smad and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways. Mol Med Rep. 2019; 19: 177-86.
102. Berlier JL, Rethnam M, Banu Binte Abdul Majeed A, Suda T. Modification of the bone marrow MSC population in a xenograft model of early multiple myeloma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019; 508: 1175-81.
103. Goralski KB, Jackson AE, McKeown BT, Sinal CJ. More than an adipokine: the complex roles of chemerin signaling in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2019; 20: 4778.
104. Poggi A, Varesano S, Zocchi MR. How to hit mesenchymal stromal cells and make the tumor microenvironment immunostimulant rather than immunosuppressive. Front Immunol. 2018; 9: 262. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/ fimmu.2018.00262/full.
105. Turley SJ, Cremasco V, Astarita JL. Immunological hallmarks of stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015; 15: 669-82.
106. Al-Jawadi A, Rasha F, Ramalingam L, Alhaj S, Moussa H, Gollahon L, et al. Protective effects of eicosapentaenoic acid in adipocyte-breast cancer cell cross talk. J Nutr Biochem. 2020; 75: 108244.
107. Mandal S, Arfuso F, Sethi G, Dharmarajan A, Warrier S. Encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells (eMSCs) as a novel anti-cancer agent targeting breast cancer stem cells: development of 3D primed therapeutic MSCs. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2019; 110: 59-69.
108. Kato M, Placencio-Hickok VR, Madhav A, Haldar S, Tripathi M, Billet S, et al. Heterogeneous cancer-associated fibroblast population potentiates neuroendocrine differentiation and castrate resistance in a CD105-dependent manner. Oncogene. 2019; 38: 716-30.
109. Rogers O, Yen H, Solomon A, Drake C, Denmeade SR. An IL-2 proaerolysin fusion toxin that selectively eliminates regulatory t cells to enhance antitumor immune response. The Prostate. 2019; 79: 1071-8.
110. Cao W, Liu B, Xia F, Duan M, Hong Y, Niu J, et al. MnO2@ Ce6-loaded mesenchymal stem cells as an “oxygen-laden guided-missile” for the enhanced photodynamic therapy on lung cancer. Nanoscale. 2020; 12: 3090-102.
111. Wang X, Chen H, Zeng X, Guo W, Jin Y, Wang S, et al. Efficient lung cancer-targeted drug delivery via a nanoparticle/MSC system. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2019; 9: 167-76.
112. Mahasa KJ, Pillis L de, Ouifki R, Eladdadi A, Maini P, Yoon AR, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells used as carrier cells of oncolytic adenovirus results in enhanced oncolytic virotherapy. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 425.
113. Mohamed Y, Mohamed Y, Elsayed S, Gazia M, Abdel-Aleem G, Shafik N, et al. Melatonin maximizes the therapeutic potential of non-preconditioned MSCs in a DEN-induced rat model of HCC. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 114: 108732.
114. Yang J, Lv K, Sun J, Guan J. Anti-tumor effects of engineered mesenchymal stem cells in colon cancer model [Internet]. Cancer Manag Res. 2019; 11: 8443-50.
115. Kim SD, Yi JM, Park M-T. Irradiated endothelial cells modulate the malignancy of liver cancer cells. Oncol Lett. 2019; 17: 2187-96.
116. Boada M, Echarte L, Guillermo C, Diaz L, Touriño C, Grille S. 5-Azacytidine restores interleukin 6-increased production in mesenchymal stromal cells from myelodysplastic patients. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020; http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S2531137920300043. In press.
117. Olga OU, Olga VZ, Maria IE, Irina VO, Elena RA, Ludmila BB, et al. Low-dose photodynamic therapy promotes angiogenic potential and increases immunogenicity of human mesenchymal stromal cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2019; 199: 111596.
118. Costea T, Vlad OC, Miclea L-C, Ganea C, Szöllősi J, Mocanu M-M. Alleviation of multidrug resistance by flavonoid and non-flavonoid compounds in breast, lung, colorectal and prostate cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21: 401.
119. Maj M, Kokocha A, Bajek A, Drewa T. The effects of adipose-derived stem cells on CD133-expressing bladder cancer cells. J Cell Biochem. 2019; 120: 11562-72.
120. Blache U, Horton ER, Xia T, Schoof EM, Blicher LH,
Schönenberger A, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cell activation by breast cancer secretomes in bioengineered 3D microenvironments. Life Sci All. 2019; 2: e201900304.
121. Quach ND, Kaur SP, Eggert MW, Ingram L, Ghosh D, Sheth S, et al. Paradoxical role of glypican-1 in prostate cancer cell and tumor growth. Sci Rep. 2019; 9: 11478.
122. Kopantzev EP, Kopantseva MR, Grankina EV, Mikaelyan A, Egorov VI, Sverdlov ED. Activation of IGF/IGF-IR signaling pathway fails to induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells. Pancreatology. 2019; 19: 390-6.
123. Zhou X, Li T, Chen Y, Zhang N, Wang P, Liang Y, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles promote the in vitro proliferation and migration of breast cancer cells through the activation of the ERK pathway. Int J Oncol. 2019; 54: 1843-52.
124. Ritter A, Friemel A, Roth S, Kreis NN, Hoock SC, Safdar BK, et al. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells: commonality and diversity. Cells. 2019; 8: 1288. 125. Huang Y, Li Q, Zhang K, Hu M, Wang Y, Du L, et al. Single cell
transcriptomic analysis of human mesenchymal stem cells reveals limited heterogeneity. Cell Death Dis. 2019; 10: 1-12.
Cite this article as: Nwabo Kamdje AH, Seke Etet PF, Tagne Simo R,
Vecchio L, Lukong KE, Krampera M. Emerging data supporting stromal cell therapeutic potential in cancer: reprogramming stromal cells of the tumor microenvironment for anti-cancer effects. Cancer Biol Med. 2020; 17: 828-841. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2020.0133
