• Non ci sono risultati.

Investigating the correlation between GDP and cancers

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Investigating the correlation between GDP and cancers"

Copied!
8
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

5 Conclusions and final remarks

The overall incidence of cancer rates is growing throughout the world and it will constitute a serious challenge for scientists and health care systems in the years to come.

In Chapter 2 I showed the relevance of the phenomenon and I reported previous studies (Bray et al 2012; Beaulieu et al. (2009)) that, in some ways, opened the way for the correlation between GDP and cancer incidence.

In Chapter 3 a brief literature on the state of the art in the medical community concerning cancer etiology was presented, in order to select the right variables to put inside the theoretical model. The model was presented in chapter 4, together with a description concerning the sources (Globocan 2012, World Bank, United Nations Population) with which I have built my dataset: the general sample was composed of 107 countries.

Regressions and statistical analysis have been conducted using R software.

Then, I ran multivariate regressions between lagged three-year average GDP per capita and average standardized rates of cancer, also including health expenditure per capita in order to isolate the effect of screening from the data. The expectation, in fact, was to find a positive correlation with health expenditure per capita (a proxy to represent the state of the art in screening technologies for cancer incidence).

Also ex-ante expectations about the level of GDP per capita and incidence were positive, especially in the interpretation that sees GDP as a proxy for Anthropocene level in environment.

The results, instead, are more complex and graphs associated exhibit a manner of bell shape, a result that is quite robust (considering the overall sample) due to the two-step procedure implemented (Health expenditure was regressed on ASR(W) and then the residuals were regressed on GDP per capita, in linear, quadratic and cubic component).

GDP per capita seems to have different contributions to incidence rate according to its level: a low level is associated with a negative effect (more income, less incidence); a medium level is associated with a positive effect, and then a high level (a value that is very sensitive to the lag

(2)

adopted: for example it emerges after $23000 per capita in PPP with reference to the year 1996) newly correlates with a negative effect.

I also checked the hypothesis that reducing significantly the lag (from 15 years to 11 years, 6 years and, finally, to 1 year) might be associated with a loss of significance of one of the two variables included in the multivariate (three-year average GDP per capita in PPP and Health expenditure per capita in PPP). The results are quite coherent with this idea, especially in the lag of 1 year where the variable Health Expenditure per capita (for 2012) becomes insignificant in statistical terms. However, due to the difficulties of interpreting the loss of significance of Health expenditure compared to GDP, I created a sub-sample which differentiates between Low Income (70) and High Income (27) countries.

Low Income countries present a strong correlation between Health expenditure per capita and Average Standardized Rate of cancer: all possible specifications of the model, which includes GDP per capita (also using different time lags) report a statistical insignificance of the variable. The results are quite simple to interpret: in poor countries, the increasing burden of cancer, in terms of incidence rates, seems to be caused mainly from increased diagnostic techniques which are developing in, and have been imported from, High Income countries.

It would be interesting, on this respect, to see the result from High Income countries: however, general insignificance of the variables seems to suggest the idea that a sample of 27 does not provide solid results for inference.

At the end, using the already mentioned subsample (low income countries and high income countries), I created regressions with idiosyncratic cancers identified by medical literature (Breast, Prostate, Lung and Colorectum for High Income; Cervical, Liver, Oesophagus and Stomach for Low Income), using as before Health expenditure as control variable.

The High Income sub-sample, due to the small number of observations, presents problems of significance but is does not provide different results from the starting analysis.

In Low Income countries, however, GDP appears to be statistically insignificant: the result is not really strange, considering the low level (in relative and absolute levels) of health technologies (which include those which are diagnostic) and the general low quality of data registries. As a

(3)

result, it might be reasonable to assess the idea that in low income countries a large part of cancer incidence is due to increasing diagnostic techniques and not to GDP effects.

There is still huge space for further investigation: in particular, it would be very useful to have comparable (and reliable) data through the years in order to run a panel regression (and have a proper analysis on possible co-integration relationships between variables). Moreover, it would be quite interesting to include other variables that assess the role of tobacco and overall lifestyle. It is also possible to model the dynamic of health in more complex and accurate ways (and check how they are related to screening technologies). Lastly, it is important to remember that more specific regional (or national) studies may be done, in order to study idiosyncratic situations.

The battle with cancer is still a long one and accurate and multidisciplinary research is still very much required.

(4)

Bibliography

 Alavanja, Michael CR, et al. “Use of agricultural pesticides and prostate cancer risk in the Agricultural Health Study cohort.” American Journal of Epidemiology 157.9 (2003): 800-814.

 Beaulieu, N., et al. “Breakaway: The global burden of cancer-challenges and opportunities.”

The Economist Intelligence Unit (2009).

Bertram, John S. “The molecular biology of cancer.” Molecular aspects of medicine 21.6 (2000): 167-223.

Bhargava, Alok, et al. “Modeling the effects of health on economic growth.” Journal of

health economics 20.3 (2001): 423-440.

 Bizzarri, M., et al. “Beyond the oncogene paradigm: understanding complexity in cancerogenesis.” Acta biotheoretica 56.3 (2008): 173-196.

 Bloom, David E., David Canning, and Jaypee Sevilla. “The effect of health on economic growth: a production function approach.” World development 32.1 (2004): 1-13.

 Boffetta, Paolo. “Human cancer from environmental pollutants: the epidemiological evidence.” Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis 608.2 (2006): 157-162.

Bowman, Adrian W., and Adelchi Azzalini. Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis:

the kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations: the kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations.

Oxford University Press, 1997.

Boyle, P., and D. M. Parkin. “Statistical methods for registries.” Cancer registration:

principles and methods 95 (1991): 126-158.

 Bray, Freddie, et al. “Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008–2030): a population-based study.” The lancet oncology 13.8 (2012): 790-801.

Brenner, Sydney. “Turing centenary: Life’s code script.” Nature 482.7386 (2012): 461-461.  Burgio E. “La “pandemia silenziosa” “Trasformazioni ambientali, climatiche, epidemiche”, in

Science and democracy 2006

Burgio E. “Cancerogenesi ambientale: vecchi e nuovi paradigmi”, in Associazione Italiana di

Oncologia Medica Progetto ambiente e tumori, Edito da Aiom,Via E. Nöe, 23 - 20133

Milano, Italy, 2011

 Burgio E., Migliorini L. “Towards a systemic paradigm in carcinogenesis: linking epigenetics and genetics”. Molecular biology reports 42.4 (2015): 777-790.

 Costanza, Robert, et al. “Beyond GDP: The need for new measures of progress.” (2009).  Crutzen, Paul J. “Geology of mankind.” Nature 415.6867 (2002): 23-23.

 Danaei, Goodarz, et al. “Causes of cancer in the world: comparative risk assessment of nine behavioural and environmental risk factors.” The Lancet 366.9499 (2005): 1784-1793.  Easterlin, Richard A. “Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical

evidence.” Nations and households in economic growth 89 (1974): 89-125.

Efron, Bradley, and Robert J. Tibshirani. An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC press, 1994.  Eskeland, Gunnar S., and Ann E. Harrison. "Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and

the pollution haven hypothesis." Journal of development economics 70.1 (2003): 1-23. Gentilini P. “Cancerogenesi ambientale: inquadramento” in Associazione Italiana di

Oncologia Medica Progetto ambiente e tumori, Edito da Aiom,Via E. Nöe, 23 - 20133

(5)

Greaves M, “An evolutionary foundation for cancer control” in International Agency for

Research on Cancer. “World cancer report 2014.” Geneva: WHO (2014).

Hanahan, Douglas, and Robert A. Weinberg. “The hallmarks of cancer.” cell 100.1 (2000): 57-70.

International Agency for Research on Cancer. “Social inequalities and cancer”. Lyon, France

(1997).

International Agency for Research on Cancer. “World cancer report 2014.” Geneva: WHO

(2014).

 Lechleiter J.C. “Targeting Non-Communicable Diseases”, Project Syndacate, (2015). https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/targeting-non-communicable-diseases-by-john-c--lechleiter-2015-10

 Lichtenstein, Paul, et al. “Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer— analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland.” New England journal of

medicine 343.2 (2000): 78-85.

Luzzati, T., and M. Orsini. “Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve.” Energy 34.3 (2009): 291-300.

Maule, Milena et al., Cancer transition and priorities for cancer control”, The Lancet

Oncology, Volume 13 , Issue 8 , 745 – 746

 Naeim, Faramarz, Farhad Moatamed, and Muhammad Sahimi. “Morphogenesis of the bone marrow: fractal structures and diffusion-limited growth.” Blood 87.12 (1996): 5027-5031.

Nowell, Peter C. “The clonal evolution of tumor cell populations.” Science 194.4260 (1976): 23-28.

 Omran, Abdel R. “The epidemiologic transition: a theory of the epidemiology of population change.” Milbank Quarterly 83.4 (2005): 731-757.

 Pirastu, Roberta, et al. "SENTIERI-Studio Epidemiologico Nazionale dei Territori e degli Insediamenti Esposti a Rischio da Inquinamento: valutazione della evidenza

epidemiologica." Epidemiol Prev 34.5-6 (2010): 1-96.

 Pubblicazione di AIOM, CCM (Centro nazionale per la prevenzione e il controllo delle malattie), AIRTUM (Associazione Italiana Registri Tumori), I numeri del Cancro in Italia 2014, a cura di INTERMEDIA Editore 2014 Ottobre, Color Art, Rodengo Saiano (Bs)

 R Core Team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.URL http://www.R-project.org/.  Registro Nazionale Mesoteliomi, “Approfondimenti di ricerca Dispensa bibliografica” INAIL

(2014)

Ridolfi, Coordinatore Ruggero. “Progetto Ambiente e Tumori.” Associazione Italiana di

Oncologia, Medica Edizione (2011).

 Sachs, Jeffrey D. “Macroeconomics and health: investing in health for economic development.” Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública 12.2 (2002): 143-144.

 Sanderson, Eric W., et al. “The Human Footprint and the Last of the Wild: the human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not.” BioScience 52.10 (2002): 891-904.

 Setel, Philip W., et al. “A scandal of invisibility: making everyone count by counting everyone.” The Lancet 370.9598 (2007): 1569-1577.

Shapiro, James A. “How life changes itself: The Read–Write (RW) genome.” Physics of life

(6)

Silverman, Bernard W. Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Vol. 26. CRC press, 1986.

 Steffen, Will, Paul J. Crutzen, and John R. McNeill. “The Anthropocene: are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature.” AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 36.8 (2007): 614-621.

 Steliarova-Foucher, Eva, et al. “Geographical patterns and time trends of cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents in Europe since the 1970s (the ACCIS project): an epidemiological study.” The Lancet 364.9451 (2004): 2097-2105.

Stern, David I. “The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve.” World development 32.8 (2004): 1419-1439.

 Stuckler, David, et al. “WHO’s budgetary allocations and burden of disease: a comparative analysis.” The Lancet 372.9649 (2008): 1563-1569.

 Sugimura, Takashi. “Mutagens, carcinogens, and tumor promoters in our daily food.”

Cancer 49.10 (1982): 1970-1984.

Sugimura, Takashi. “Food and cancer.” Toxicology 181 (2002): 17-21.

 Tomatis, L. “Poverty and cancer”, in International Agency for Research on Cancer. “Social inequalities and cancer”. Lyon, France (1997).

Van Alstine, James, and Eric Neumayer. “3 The environmental Kuznets curve.” Handbook

on trade and the environment (2010): 49.

Van Zon, Adriaan, and Joan Muysken. “Health and endogenous growth.” Journal of health

economics 20.2 (2001): 169-185.

 Vitousek, Peter M., et al. “Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis.”

BioScience (1986): 368-373.

 World Health Organization. “Global status report on noncommunicable diseases. Geneva: 2010.” World Health Organization.[acesso em 2012 Fev 28]. Disponível em: http://www.

who. int/nmh/publications/ncd_report2010/en (2014).

 Yandle, Bruce, Madhusudan Bhattarai, and Maya Vijayaraghavan. “Environmental Kuznets curves: a review of findings, methods, and policy implications.” Research study 2 (2004): 1-16.

(7)

Sitography  http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21652308-tiny-sultanate-not-afraid-stand-alone-country-apart  http://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/91/5/13-020513/en/  http://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/businesscycle.asp  http://www.economist.com/events-conferences/emea/war-cancer-london  http://www.thefreedictionary.com/bioaccumulation  http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/endocrine/  http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/apoptosis  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21870/  http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/basics/gdp.htm  http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD  http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PCAP.PP.KD  http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx  http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/glossary.aspx  http://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/world.who.html  http://data.un.org/DataMartInfo.aspx

(8)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

As the relaxivity of the calcium-free SCAs examined in this work is primarily determined by q 2sf , the observed changes within the series are nicely correlated with the number

Lasciando a parte la questione della datazione dell’episodio testé menzionato (questione risolvibile, allo stato, solo congetturalmente mediante ricostruzioni che,

98 D.V.Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, M.V.Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 99. Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München,

To verify the expediency of one method rather than another, we compared the concentration and purity (arithmetical average of the values obtained for all the strains tested in

The surgical regenerative procedures expected in: – bilateral sinus lifts; – correction of vertical discrepancy by alveoloplastic procedure and occlusal onlay, in the left maxilla;

(Rödel et al., 2008), does are individually housed during 12 days after parturition and group

"Il diario di Satana" è un romanzo incompiuto, scritto in forma di appunti di diario, sul destino di Satana sulla terra sotto spoglie umane.. Incarnatosi in un