• Non ci sono risultati.

New numerical results and novel effective string predictions for Wilson loops

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "New numerical results and novel effective string predictions for Wilson loops"

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

JHEP04(2013)097

Published for SISSA by Springer

Received: April 4, 2013 Accepted: April 4, 2013 Published: April 16, 2013

Erratum: new numerical results and novel effective

string predictions for Wilson loops

M. Bill´o, M. Caselle and R. Pellegrini

Dipartimento di Fisica Teorica, Universit`a di Torino,

and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare – sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, I-10125 Torino, Italy

E-mail: billo@to.infn.it,caselle@to.infn.it,pellegri@to.infn.it

Erratum to: JHEP01(2012)104

Abstract: We correct a few misprints present in the published version, regarding eq.s (4.30), (4.35), (A.4) and (A.6). Plots and results of the paper are not affected since they were derived from the correct formulae.

c

(2)

JHEP04(2013)097

The published version of this paper unfortunately contains some misprints in four displayed equations, of which we list below the correct form. We remark that plots and overall results of the paper are not affected by these misprints since they were derived from the correct formulae.

Eq. (4.30) must be replaced by the following one: W(A, u) =√2πσ|N |2 2 u α 4 r π 2σAe −σAX k cke−2πuˆ k × ( 1 + 1 σA  α2 − 4 32 + α− 2 2 πuˆk + 2π 2 u2ˆk2  + 1 (σA)2  α4 − 40α2 + 144 2048 + α3 − 6α2 − 4α + 24 64 πuˆk + 3 16(α 2 − 8α + 12)π2u2ˆk2+ (α− 6)π3u3ˆk3 + 2π4u4kˆ4  + O  1 (σA)3 ) (4.30) Eq. (4.35) must be replaced with

ˆ L3(u) =

π 24

4

6(D + 24)Du4E42(iu)− 3D(D − 8)(D − 12)u 2

E4(iu)E2(iu)E2(i/u) +D(D− 4)(D − 8)(D − 12) 8 E 2 2(iu)E 2 2(i/u)  −π 24 3 4D(D− 12)u3E6(iu)  1π 3uE2(iu)  +π 24 2 3 64D(D− 4)(D − 12)u 2 E4(iu) −(D + 4)D(D−4)(D−12) 256 E2(iu)E2(i/u)  +(D + 12)(D + 4)(D− 4)(D − 12) 32768 . (4.35) Eq. (A.4) becomes

E2k(τ ) = 1 + 2 ζ(1− 2k) ∞ X n=1 σ2k−1(n) q n , (A.4)

Finally, eq. (A.6) should become

E2(τ ) = 1− 24 ∞ X n=1 σ1(n) q n , E4(τ ) = 1 + 240 ∞ X n=1 σ3(n) q n , E6(τ ) = 1− 504 ∞ X n=1 σ5(n) q n . (A.6) Acknowledgments

We thank M. Bruno for pointing to us a few of the above misprints.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

sense that when a superlinear condition at infinity is assumed, then we have an unbounded sequence of solutions, while when we require a sublinear behaviour near zero we find

Indeed, in these papers, under a discreteness assumption on the set of minimal one dimensional solutions, it is obtained the existence of infinitely many entire solutions on R 2

Russo, Mixed virtual element methods for general second order elliptic problems on polygonal meshes. Russo virtual element methods for general second order elliptic problems

Random walks, renewal theory, Markov renewal theory, scaling limits, polymer models, wetting

On one hand, we shall discuss the existence of hyperelliptic curves lying on the Jacobian variety - and a fortiori on the second symmetric product - of a generic curve by extending

As an application, we give some double inequalities concerning the (p, q, k)- generalized gamma function by using of its q-integral representation.. Keywords: Gamma

We study the nonlinear Neumann problem (1) involving a critical Sobolev expo- nent and a nonlinearity of lower order... The assumption (f 1 ) replaces the usual

Figure 3 shows more details on the precision of our solution by showing the number of global icebergs that should be detected (referred to as generated) and the number of items