Introduction
Ectopic Breast Tissue (EBT) is the most common congeni-tal breast abnormality [1]. The occurrence of EBT ranges from 0,6% to 6% in the general population. Multiple theo-ries have been proposed to explain the occurrence of acces-sory breast. These include Darwin’s theory which stated that “traits which have disappeared generations before, can reap-pear”; Pfeifer’s theory of metaplasia of sweat glands or modi-fied sweat glands; Hughes’s theory of random migration of primordial breast cells away from the mammary crest, and Schultz’s theory of displacement of milk lines, laterally or caudally [2-5]. Despite morphological differences, EBT pres-ents characteristics analogous to orthotopic breast tissue in terms of function and pathological degeneration. EBT comes in two forms: supernumerary and aberrant [6]. A
supernu-1Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
2PhD in Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy 3Department of Diagnostic Imaging, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
4Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
Corresponding Author:Giovanni Tazzioli, Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Modena, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124
Modena, Italy.
Axillary Ectopic Carcinoma of the Breast. Report of Two Cases with Different
Clinical Presentation and Review of the Literature
Received: November 25, 2019; Accepted: December 5, 2019; Published: December 10, 2019
merary breast consists of a ductal system communicating with the overlying skin, usually located along the ‘‘milk line’’, which extends from the axilla to the groin. It frequently re-sponds to hormonal stimulation and undergoes physiologic changes as a complete functioning breast [7], is subject to the same diseases and alterations, whether benign or malignant, that affect orthotopic breasts [8,9]. Two varieties of super-numerary breast should be distinguished: polymastia and polythelia. Polymastia (less than 1% of the population) is an accessory gland that occur as a consequence of the mam-mary ridge failing to regress during embryonic development. The gland may be found in association with an areola-nipple complex. Polythelia (about 1,4% of the population) presents itself in the form of an areola and/or a nipple lacking glan-dular tissue [10]. Aberrant breast, consists of an isolated fragment of glandular tissue located beyond the periphery
Federico Piacentini
1, Francesca Combi
2, Raffaella D’Onofrio
1, Claudia Omarini
1, Luca Moscetti
1,
Antonella Drago
3, Alessia Andreotti
4, Giulia Rovesti
1, Enza Palma
4, Anna Gambini
4, Simona Papi
4,
Giovanni Tazzioli4*
Abstract
Aims: Primary ectopic breast cancer (PEBC) is a rare and often misdiagnosed condition. Through the discussion of two clinical
cases, we want to focus on clinical presentation, outcomes and treatment of PEBC, to lead clinicians to awareness and optimal management.
Methods: We present the case of a 47-year-old patient, with a 30 mm axillary mass, that was diagnosed as a PEBC (infiltrating
lobular carcinoma, triple negative). The patient underwent systemic staging: diffuse metastatic bone lesions and leptomeningeal metastasis were found.
The second patient is a 73-year-old woman with personal history of right breast tumor. She came to our attention for a 9 mm left axillary mass, suspicious for a metastatic lymph node. A fine-needle cytology revealed the absence of lymphoid cells but the pres-ence of atypical epithelial cells, as in a primary breast carcinoma. She was treated with local excision and sentinel node biopsy.
Results: The first patient presented with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis and she deceased after three months from the
diagnosis, despite systemic chemotherapy. The diagnosis was performed at an early stage in the second patient. She underwent surgery, complementary endocrine therapy and radiotherapy. She has no evident disease after two years from surgery.
Conclusion: Primary ectopic breast cancer is a rare clinical entity, often misdiagnosed or diagnosed with a long delay. The
treat-ment of PEBC is analogous to that of orthotopic breast cancer, but we strongly recommend to approach the patient with a multi-disciplinary team to provide the best staging workout and therapies.
Keywords:
Ectopic breast tissue; Ectopic breast cancer; Axillary masses; Multidisciplinary managementVolume - 1 Issue - 1
Research Article
of orthotopic breasts; it is characterized by an unorganized secretory system without any connection between the in-side and the outin-side. The axilla is most frequently involved (70%) and the glandular tissue is located in the subcutane-ous tissue and deep dermis [11]. Another 20% occurs in tho-racic or abdominal portion of milk line, often on the left side of the body just below the inframammary crease [12]. EBT formation has also been found outside the galactic band that is in the face, posterior neck, midback, buttock, vulva, flank, hip, posterior and/or lateral thigh, shoulder and upper ex-tremities [11]. This condition has also been associated with other congenital anomalies (nervous, cardiovascular, gas-troenteric, skeletal, and, particularly, renal abnormalities) [8,13-15]. Data in the literature concerning the probability of malignant degeneration of EBT, and its management are scanty and controversial [10]. All articles regarding Primary Ectopic Breast Cancer (PEBC) are case reports and histori-cal reviews. No systematic reviews or clinihistori-cal trials are avail-able. Given the rarity of this clinical condition, no specific guidelines are available in literature. Thus, early diagnosis and optimal management are still challenging for clinicians. The aim of this article is to describe two cases of breast can-cer involving an EBT and to review the most recent litera-ture.
Material and Methods
Patient 1: A 47-year-old Caucasian woman with familiar
history of breast cancer, performing regular annual clini-cal examination and mammography as part of the screen-ing for SHBC patients. At clinical examination, a 30 mm hard mass was detected in the left axilla, with no evident com-munication with the skin nor any structure referable to a nipple-areola-like complex (aberrant tissue). Imaging with mammography and high definition ultrasound revealed a hypo-echoic 25 mm mass, suspicious for a neoplasm on ectopic mammary gland. The radiological diagnosis was completed with breast MRI, which confirmed a 48×45 mm mass and an enlarged 20 mm lymph node. A core biopsy of the axillary suspicious mass was performed, and resulted in an infiltrative lobular carcinoma, triple-negative and MIB-1: 12% (Figure 1). In the orthotopic left mammary gland two more nodular masses were found (diagnosed as C4 at a fine-needle aspiration cytology) and a 14 mm lymph node was visible in the omolateral axilla. An interdisciplinary team approach recommended systemic staging with a thoraco-abdominal CT scan, that showed diffuse metastatic bone lesions (sternum, hip bones, dorsal and lumbar vertebrae, femoral bone), confirmed by a bone scintigraphy.
Figure 1. H&E sections of lobular carcinoma in Patient 1.
Patient 2: A 73-year-old Caucasian woman with familiar
history of breast cancer (a maternal aunt and three mater-nal cousins at the age of 33, 70 and 75 with negative BRCA mutation test). She underwent right mastectomy with re-constructive surgery and axillary lymphadenectomy two years before for a triple negative ductal infiltrative carci-noma of the breast. Surgery was followed by adjuvant che-motherapy with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide for four cycles and weekly paclitaxel for 12 administrations. Follow up was negative, until a 9 mm nodular lesion was detected by ultrasound in the left axillary cavity. The first clinical sus-picion was for a metastatic lymph node even if the mass was in a subcutaneous position. A fine-needle aspiration cytol-ogy was performed and revealed the presence of atypical epithelial cells, but no lymphoid cells were detectable. The diagnostic suspicion thus turned for a neoplasm of an ecto-pic mammary gland, in its aberrant form. A breast MRI and a systemic re-staging with thoraco-abdominal CT scan were done and did not show any distant metastasis.
Results
Patient 1: The patient underwent systemic chemotherapy
with FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide) for four cycles and simultaneous zoledronic acid, followed by Taxotere every three weeks. She also received radia-tion therapy (3 Gy x 10 fracradia-tions) on the acetabulo-femoral joint and on ischio-pubic hip bone. At the end of the treat-ment, a local restaging with breast MRI was performed and showed a reduction of the axillary mass (39×20 mm). The two smaller nodular masses were no longer detectable. The bone scintigraphy showed a downsizing of the metastatic bone lesions and no new metastatic lesions were visible on the thoraco-abdominal CT scan.
Seventeen days after the end of chemotherapy the patient presented nausea, vomiting, dizziness and vertigo. A brain CT scan without contrast medium was performed and did not show any brain lesion. The patient was treated with corticosteroid therapy with transitory reduction of symp-toms. A few days after, temporal-spatial disorientation and headache appeared. The patient underwent a brain MRI with contrast medium, which showed the presence of lepto-meningeal metastasis. The examination of the cerebrospinal fluid confirmed the diagnosis, showing multiple neoplastic epithelial cells. A supportive therapy was administered until the patient deceased, one month later.
Patient 2: An interdisciplinary team approach
recommend-ed wide local excision and sentinel node biopsy. The final pathological report revealed a grade 1 papillary carcinoma of the breast (Figure 2), with ER 98%, PgR 98%, Her-2 nega-tive and MIB-1: 4%. Sentinel node was neganega-tive. The patient received both adjuvant endocrine therapy with Tamoxifen and external beam radiotherapy to whole residual breast and ipsilateral axillary region, until completing 50 Gy. She is in good clinical conditions with no evident disease after two years from surgery.
Figure 2. H&E sections of papillary carcinoma in Patient 2.
Discussion
Both case reports present an opportunity to discuss clinical pre-sentation, outcome and treatment of PEBC. Despite morpho-logical differences EBT, whether supernumerary or aberrant, present characteristics analogous to orthotopic tissue in terms of function and pathological degeneration, including carcinoma [16,17]. PEBC is uncommon, accounting for 0,2 to 0,6 % of all breast cancers [12], but it has been reported in 60% to 70% of all forms of ectopic breast tumor. More frequently ectopic breast cancer is found in aberrant breast tissue, as it was in both the cases we presented. Clinical diagnosis is more challenging in aberrant tissue, because no visible anatomical structure (nipple-areola complex) suggests the underlying presence of breast tis-sue, as it is in complete supernumerary breast. Only a minority of patients develop breast cancer on a complete supernumerary breast. Some researchers consider malignant degeneration of EBT to be highly probable. In particular, aberrant breast tissue is reportedly more prone to malignant transformation than or-thotopic or ectopic breast tissue [18,19], due to the stagnation in the ductal lumens which is considered a promoting factor for the development of malignancy [6]. It is no clear if PEBC has a race-prevalence as for BC. Some papers describe the highest incidence among Japanese and the lowest among Caucasians [11]. Familiar transmission account 10% of cases, as in the sec-ond case report reported above [12]. PEBC seems to affect peo-ple at a younger age compared to BC. However, PEBC shows a 50 % peak of incidence between 40 and 45 years and a median age at diagnosis of 51 years [11]. There is a general belief that the risk factors for BC apply also to ectopic tissue. Clinical di-agnosis is often delayed if not systematically considered in the differential diagnosis due to unfamiliarity with the condition, even in patients that regularly perform examinations for breast cancer familiar predisposition or in patients that already have a personal clinical history of breast cancer. The estimated delay in diagnosis is around 3.3 years. The presence of a subcutaneous mass along the milk line with clinical features of palpable mass, skin thickening, tenderness, or edema [20], should provoke a high suspicion for PEBC and this disease should be ruled out first [21]. Ultrasound is the first additional step: the presence of a hypo-echoic, not well-defined heterogeneous mass, without signs of inflammation, is suspicious [22]. Mammography may add further information even if micro calcifications of EBT are difficult to delineate [23,24]. The differential diagnosis of an axillary nodular mass must always include other subcutaneous
masses such as fibroadenoma, lipoma, abscess, sebaceous cyst, hydradenitis or follicular cyst, haematoma, seroma, foreign body and lymphadenopathy associated with benign (mastitis, breast abscess, trauma, infection to upper extremity, tularemia, cat scratch disease, TBC, actinomicosis, etc) or malignant dis-ease [19,25]. Particularly, PEBC should be included in the dif-ferential diagnosis over metastatic nodes from chest and breast neoplasms, skin cancer, Hodgkin disease, adnexal malignant or soft tissue tumor. Therefore, in case of a unilateral axillary mass, breast, upper extremity and chest wall must always be accu-rately checked. In case of a suspicious lesion, Fine-Needle As-piration Biopsy (FNAB)/core biopsy of the axillary lump should be performed to harvest cells/tissue for histologic diagnosis [26]. If a PEBC is diagnosed, the regular work-up guidelines for BC should be followed. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) might be useful in defining the extension of the PEBC and its relationship with normal breast tissue before surgery [27] and for the best differential diagnosis between PEBC and occult pri-mary breast cancer. Invasive ductal carcinoma Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) is the most common histotype both in ortho-topic (40-75%) and ecortho-topic breast tissue (72%) [9,25,28], fol-lowed by invasive lobular carcinoma and medullary carcinoma (12%). Several pathological and immunohystochimic features can help to define the diagnosis: (1) Histologic pattern of a pri-mary breast carcinoma in situ, (2) Presence of normal breast tissue surrounding the tumor, (3) Specific immunohistology for BC such as Estrogen and/or Progesteron receptors, and common breast markers such as Gross Cystic Disease Fluid Protein (GCDFP)-15. Although Her2/Neu, CEA and glandular keratins can be expressed in BC, they do not discriminate between a PEBC and a skin adnexal tumor, because they are not specific for the breast. Axillary node metastasis should be excluded too. The lymphatic spread of PEBC is most likely towards the ho-molateral axillary nodes and from there towards the supracla-vicular nodes, because this is the normal lymphatic drainage of the subcutaneous and cutaneous tissues of the armpit. Whether to consider the internal mammary lymph nodes as distant metas-tasis instead of loco-regional involvement is still discussed and it affects systemic staging (M1 versus N1 or N2). When PEBC has been diagnosed, it is classified according to the TNM stag-ing system used for primary breast carcinoma [24] and it should be treated in the same way as orthotopic breast disease. As we described in our clinical reports, both oncological and surgical approaches must be considered as primary treatment, depending on the stage, the performance status of the patient and the histo-pathological features of the tumor. The role of Sentinel Node Biopsy (SNB) for PEBC of the axilla is not clear. The general trend has been to perform axillary clearance in all patients. However, in our second case report, after multidisciplinary dis-cussion, the patient underwent sentinel node biopsy just to avoid a needless axillary clearance. Prognosis of accessory breast car-cinoma is difficult to ascertain due to its rarity. Poor outcomes compared to native breast cancer have been reported, which may relate to delayed diagnosis often until clinical symptoms are present [29]. A higher incidence of lymph node involvement compared with primary breast carcinoma in the native breast may also contribute to different outcomes [11]. The location of primary breast carcinoma in axillary breast tissue, closer to axil-lary lymph nodes, has been linked theoretically to earlier nodal metastatic disease [30,31], but for example in our two cases we
found early distant metastasis in one case and no metastasis in the lymph node in the other. Although speculative, this may be explained by the fact that the growing of metastases is related to biologic properties of the tumor rather than to the anatomic properties of the localization [11]. No specific treatment proto-col is available in the literature for axillary PEBC and, further-more, there is no consensus on whether to excise the EBT pro-phylactically, to prevent the malignancy [32,33]. Traditionally, the surgical approach of PEBC was more aggressive, justified by the limited knowledge of its biological behavior and by the paucity of adjuvant treatments available: surgeons performed either a local tumorectomy or an ipsilateral prophylactic mas-tectomy. Cogswell and Czerny concluded that local excision combined with axillary dissection was the surgical procedure of choice [34]. Evans and Guyton suggested that radical or modi-fied radical surgery offered no advantage over local excision combined with axillary dissection or radiation with respect to outcomes [35]. Nowadays, the conservative approach (local ex-cision on primary tumor and complementary radiotherapy), is always considered as the first surgical choice when feasible. This behavior is in line with the one that is generally adopted in orthotopic breast treatment. Adjuvant treatments that had been found to be effective for BC were successfully applied to PEBC as well. Hormonal therapy, when appropriate, was an integral part of the treatment, as well. Adjuvant radiotherapy should be considered to optimize loco-regional control. A review of the literature offers no formal guidance on RT dose, fractionation, and treatment fields in this setting. Treatment fields have ranged from incorporating the tumor bed alone to inclusion of the ipsi-lateral uninvolved breast, axilla and supraclavicular fossa, even in the absence of nodal metastases [36]. Since there is no clear benefit to irradiate homo-lateral anatomic breast it is not per-formed systematically. Some authors report that it must be con-sidered in cases of uncertainty between an axillary EBT or axil-lary metastasis from unknown primary breast cancer [37]. A careful follow-up is essential because of the limited knowledge of this tumor.
Conclusion
Primary ectopic breast cancer is a rare clinical entity often mis-diagnosed or mis-diagnosed with a long delay, leading to a poorer prognosis as compared to native breast cancer. The problem stems in part from a general lack of awareness that ectopic/ac-cessory breast tissues have potentially dangerous implications, often underestimated by patients and physicians. We recom-mend to regularly include the possible sites of ectopic breast tis-sue in clinical examination and in the presence of an abnormal mass, always consider malignant tumor on ectopic breast in the differential diagnosis. Equivocal lesions, including microcalci-fication, should be considered suspicious until otherwise prov-en, followed up with close surveillance and/or candidate for di-agnostic assessment. As we described in our cases, the treatment of PEBC is analogous to that of orthotopic breast cancer, but we strongly recommend to approach the patient with a multidisci-plinary team to provide the best staging workout and therapies.
References
1. Famá F, Cicciú M, Sindoni A, Scarfó P, Pollicino A, et al. (2016) Prevalence of ectopic breast tissue and tumour: a 20 year-single center experience. Clin Breast Cancer. 16: 107-112. [Crossref]
2. Darwin C (1892) The descent of man and selection in rela-tion to sex. New York: Appleton and Co. P: 36-37. [Cross-ref]
3. Hughes ES (1950) The development of the mammary gland: Arris and Gale lecture, delivered at the Royal Col-lege of Surgeons of England on 25th October, 1949. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 6: 99-119. [Crossref]
4. Pfeifer JD, Barr RJ, Wick MR (1999) Ectopic breast tis-sue and breast-like sweat gland metaplasias: an overlapping spectrum of lesions. J Cutan Patholo. 26: 190-196. [Cross-ref]
5. Schultz A (1933) Pathologische anatomic der brustdruse. In: Handbuch der speziellen Pathologischen Anatomie and Histologie. Berlin: Julius Springer. [Crossref]
6. Williams WR (1891) Polymastism, with special reference to mammae erraticae and the development of neoplasms from supernumerary mammary structures. J Anat Physiol 25: 225-255. [Crossref]
7. Nakao A, Saito S, Inoue F, Notohara K, Tanaka N (1998) Ectopic breast cancer: a case report and review of the Japa-nese literature. Anticancer Res. 18: 3737-3740. [Crossref] 8. Senatore G, Zanotti S, Cambrini P, Montroni I, Pellegrini
A, et al. (2010) Ectopic breast fibroadenoma: a case report. G Chir. 31: 96-99. [Crossref]
9. Giron G, Friedman I, Feldman S (2004) Lobular carcinoma in ectopic axillary breast tissue. Am Surg. 70: 312-315. [Crossref]
10. Francone E, Nathan MJ, Murelli F, Bruno MS, Traverso E, et al. (2013) Ectopic breast cancer: case report and re-view of the literature. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 37: 746-749. [Crossref]
11. Visconti G, Eltahir Y, Van Ginkel RJ, Bart J, Werker PM (2011) Approach and management of primary ectopic breast carcinoma in the axilla: where are we? A compre-hensive historical literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aes-thet Surg. 64: 1-11. [Crossref]
12. Fachinetti A, Chiappa C, Arlant V, Lavazza M, Liu X, et al. (2018) Metachronous bilateral ectopic breast carcinoma: a case report. Glan Surg. 7: 234-238. [Crossref]
13. Merlob P (2003) Congenital malformations and develop-mental changes of the breast: a neonatological view. J Pedi-atr Endocrinol Metab. 16: 471-485. [Crossref]
diastometa-myelia: Case Report. J Innu Univ Med Faculty. 18: 47-49. [Crossref]
15. Zannolli R, Mostardini R, Matera M, Pucci L, Gelb BD, et al. (2000) Char syndrome: an additional family with polythelia, a new finding. Am J Med Genet. 95: 201-203. [Crossref]
16. Chan N, Penswick J, Labelle E, Driman DK (2007) Ectopic breast tissue presenting as an anal polyp. Can J Surg. 50: E23-E24. [Crossref]
17. Cutler M (1962) Tumors of the breast. Pitman Medical, London. [Crossref]
18. Marshall M, Moynihan J, Frost A, Evans SR (1994) Ecto-pic breast cancer: a case report and literature review. Surg Oncol. 3: 295-304. [Crossref]
19. Ghosn SH, Khatri KA, Bhawan J (2007), Bilateral aber-rant axillary breast tissue mimicking lipomas: report of a case and review of the literature. Cutan Pathol. 34: 9-13. [Crossref]
20. Pardo M, Silva F, Jiménez PP, Karmelic M (2001) Mam-mary carcinoma in ectopic breast tissue. A case report. Rev Med Chil. 129: 663-665. [Crossref]
21. Tjalma WA, Senten LL (2006) The management of ectopic breast cancer: case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 27:414-416. [Crossref]
22. Vignal P (2005) Sonographic appearance of a carcinoma developed in ectopic axillary breast tissue. J Clin Ultra-sound. 33: 468-470. [Crossref]
23. Muttarak M, Chaiwun B, Peh WC (2004) Role of mam-mography in diagnosis of axillary abnormalities in women with normal breast examination. Australas Radiol. 48: 306-310. [Crossref]
24. Lee J, Jung JH, Kim WW, Hwang SO, Kange JG, et al. (2014) Ductal Carcinoma Arising from Ectopic Breast Tis-sue Following Microcalcification Observed on Screening Mammography: A Case report and review of the literature. J Breast Cancer. 17: 393-396. [Crossref]
25. Nihon-Yanagi Y, Ueda T, Kameda N, Okazumi S (2011) A case of ectopic breast cancer with a literature review. Surg Oncol. 20: 35-42. [Crossref]
26. Velanovich V (1995) Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of ectopic breast tissue. Am Surg. 61: 277-278. [Crossref]
27. Capobianco G, Spaliviero B, Dessole S, Rocca PC, Cher-chi PL, et al. (2007) Lymph node axillary metastasis from occult controlateral infiltrating lobular carcinoma arising in accessory breast: MRI diagnosis. Breast J. 13: 305-307. [Crossref]
28. Teke Z, Kabay B, Akbulut M, Erdem E (2008) Primary in-filtrating ductal carcinoma arising in aberrant breast tissue of the axilla: a rare entity: report of a case. Tumori. 94: 577-583. [Crossref]
29. Yerra L, Karnad AB, Votaw ML (1997) Primary breast can-cer in aberrant breast tissue in the axilla. South Med J. 90: 661-662. [Crossref]
30. Routiot T, Marchal C, Verhaeghe JL, Depardieu C, Netter E, et al. (1998) Breast carcinoma located in ectopic breast tissue: a case report and review of the literature. Oncol Rep. 5: 413-417. [Crossref]
31. Copeland MM, Geschickter CF (1950) Diagnosis and treat-ment of premalignant lesions of the breast. Surg Clin North Am. 30: 1717-1741. [Crossref]
32. Grossl NA (2000) Supernumerary breast tissue: historical perspectives and clinical features. South Med J. 93: 29-32. [Crossref]
33. Emsen IM (2006) Treatment with ultrasound-assisted lipo-suction of accessory axillary breast tissues. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 30: 251-252. [Crossref]
34. Cogswell HD, Czerny EW (1961) Carcinoma of aberrant breast of the axilla. Am Surg 27: 388-390. [Crossref] 35. Evans DM, Guyton DP (1995) Carcinoma of the axillary
breast. J Surg Oncol. 59: 190-195. [Crossref]
36. Hallam S, Aggarwal A, Predolac D, Cunnick G, Ashford R (2013) Primary ectopic breast carcinoma in a supernumer-ary breast arising in the anterior chest wall: a case report and review of the literature. J Surg Case Rep. 2013: rjt107. [Crossref]
37. Soares A, Gonçalves J, Azevedo I, Pereira HG (2013) Lob-ular ectopic breast carcinoma: a case-report. Rep Pract On-col Radiother. 18: 189-191. [Crossref]
