• Non ci sono risultati.

Comparison of Fields of View

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Comparison of Fields of View"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Comparison of Fields of View

An optomap retinal image compared to conventional devices in a single capture.

© 2015 Optos. All rights reserved. Optos, optos and optomap are registered trademarks of Optos plc. P/N 493001 /3

Indirect Ophthalmoscope (~ 30º)

Fundus Camera (~45º)

Slit Lamp (with 90º diopter Lens) optomap Ultra-widefield Retinal image (200º)

ETDRS Standard Widefield (100º)

Building TheRetina Company

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

F-FDG PET/CT is a useful tool for the evaluation of gastric carcinoma; it can detect primary lesion, lymphnode, and distant metastases using 1 single image whole-body technique..

The goal of this research was to evaluate the effects of an innovative INM compared to conventional nutrient management, in chrysanthemum cut flower cultivation, on: (1) yield and

high dose rate by Plasma Focus devices (red bar) and standard rate by x compared to non-irradiated cells (control, black bar and black line bar), and between he number

CBCT protocols compared with 80 KV MSCT protocols resulted in reduced total radiation dose but loss of diagnostic image information and quality although no so relevant.. In addition

In this paper, we have for the first time to our knowledge reported on the potential of multiple-gate compared to single-gate devices with regards to the analog/RF ITRS targets.

In order to evaluate the efficiency of our proposed method, the adaptive is compared with the conventional sampling design (Thompson and Seber, 1996; Di Battista and Di

A second advantage of using VABB systems compared to core biopsy with conventional semiautomatic systems is the reduction of the underestimation of lesions of uncer- tain

In particular, in a mouse model we evaluated and compared RV bioavailability and concentration in different tissues after the oral administration of a single dose of RV, which