Flood Maps in the Czech Republic: Content, Perception and Information value
9
0
0
Testo completo
(2). 1, a. 1.
(3) ! "# $% &' $. Abstract. Floods are one of the most important environmental hazards in the Czech Republic. At present, flood management is more focused on non-structural flood preventive measures, which also include flood mapping. The paper analyses selected publicly available flood maps. Flood risk maps, floodplain maps and insurance maps are analysed. These maps are mainly evaluated in terms of technical performance, potential problems with maps perception by the public and enshrinement in the legislation of the Czech Republic. Results of the analysis indicate several essential problems. In the Czech Republic, floodplain maps are only based on the extent of inundation for a given scenario. Primarily, these maps are a legal construct working only with the aspect of water extent. Flood risk maps allow multi-criteria evaluation of flood risk. The imperfections of these maps are particularly of technical nature which is why it is more difficult for the public to interpret them. Insurance maps clearly define the inclusion of the place in the flood zone, but these maps shouldn´t be used for other purposes of risk assessment. Examples of selected maps are demonstrated on examples of Troubky municipality (central Moravia). Despite the imperfections mentioned above, flood maps are an important part of the flood management in the Czech Republic.. 1 Introduction
(4)
(5)
(6) ! " "# #$%&'#() # # # # ## *# + , " + *
(7) # #-#*#.$/&' 0 1+ 2
(8) " 3
(9)
(10) 3 4* ,5 , + 6 -
(11)
(12) 0 + 7 1+ 2
(13) " " * * * 0 8 *
(14) 9 ::;
(15) < *4
(16) 1+ 2
(17) " 6 0 . . " 1+ $!,=& > 4
(18) 1+ 2
(19) " 6 " 0 ;! " 1+ $=& . 3 1+ 2
(20) " 3
(21) , : ! 0
(22) " * *
(23) *
(24) 1+ 2
(25) " ? a.
(26) " * " $@, & 0
(27) " " $;& 0
(28) 0
(29) *
(30) .
(31) *
(32) $A,:& 8
(33) "
(34) 5 0 "
(35) *
(36) , 5 - - " "8 4 " 6 " * 4 6 *
(37) " $ & 0 *
(38)
(39) . 4B7?6"
(40)
(41) 1+ 2
(42) " ,
(43) C"
(44)
(45) 0 3 5 -
(46) .
(47) . 2 Aims of research and methods " *
(48) *" " 1+ 2
(49) " D
(50)
(51) * "
(52) "
(53) D0
(54)
(55)
(56) .
(57) " *"
(58) 4
(59) . Corresponding author: kamilak@mail.muni.cz. © The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)..
(60) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 10006 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. 6 " 4 -6 3* 0
(61)
(62) " *"
(63)
(64) *" * , E 5 )
(65)
(66) , 5 ) -
(67) , 5 7
(68) F " *5
(69)
(70) " *
(71)
(72) " .
(73) , *" G " , + 1+
(74)
(75) 5 -
(76)
(77) . 0 "
(78) , 3
(79)
(80)
(81) - " 3
(82)
(83) 0 "- 4
(84) 1+ 2
(85) " , < *6 " * *
(86) 4 *
(87) ::;6$A, & - + -
(88)
(89)
(90) - $ &0 "-
(91) 1+ 2
(92) " ) -
(93) H" " $ !&, A;I " 0 "- *
(94) " - 4
(95) ! 6 7 " 3
(96) 3 *
(97) . DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0710006. 3.1.1 General characteristics and enshrinement in legislation )
(98)
(99)
(100) 1+ 2
(101) " ?
(102) -, *
(103) * 4
(104) ! 6 0
(105) "
(106) " 0
(107) @=C 4 6 $ & *" H ! C $ & 7
(108)
(109) . 9 "
(110) 7 $ &, # # # # # ( *# # 3
(111) .'# 0 # 3 " "
(112)
(113) " 7 ,
(114) . "
(115) , 3
(116) ,>
(117) E ,) "
(118) 1+ 2
(119) " , , " , * . 5 0 4 @6$ & 0 *
(120) "
(121) 3 $ !&0
(122) J@,J ,J $ & 4 J E * , * * 3 * K*, I . 6 0 " "
(123) " 4
(124) =!6 > , *
(125) + .
(126) "5
(127) L0 *+ "5
(128)
(129) *
(130)
(131) *
(132) ,
(133)
(134) * ,
(135)
(136) L4 6 $ & *+ " 0 *
(137) + $ =&
(138)
(139) 0
(140) *
(141) * + G ,
(142) " *+
(143)
(144) "3
(145) 4 ;6 $ & 0
(146) - " * 3 * + 7
(147)
(148) " 3 * *+ $ @&. 3 Flood maps and their meaning 0 *" $ =& 0
(149)
(150)
(151) " * + 0
(152) " . . $ @, , ;& . - . $ A&0 " )
(153) " . - $ :& 0 *"
(154) *
(155) " * +
(156)
(157) ,
(158)
(159) , . $ &
(160)
(161) " "
(162) " "
(163) 3
(164) .
(165)
(166) 4 *" "6
(167) * "
(168) " <
(169)
(170)
(171)
(172) . "
(173) 3.1 Floodplain maps. 3.1.2 Projection, availability and use 2. 7 * 3 # # # #(
(174) .# #
(175) #
(176)
(177) # ## # 3
(178) . 0
(179)
(180) . * " *,
(181)
(182)
(183)
(184) ,
(185)
(186)
(187) 4
(188) ,
(189) " "
(190) 6 " " 0 < * 1+ 2
(191) " . 2.
(192) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 10006 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management.
(193) . "
(194)
(195) 0
(196)
(197) 0 "- $A,! & " " 9 . ""
(198) 4
(199) ==6 0 "
(200)
(201) 0 " 1+ ?. H*
(202) 1
(203) $!=& 7 ". " 9 1+ 2
(204) " > 1+ 2
(205) " ?. " 3
(206) B 4?3 6, F $!@& . "
(207) " 4 A6$ & ) *"
(208)
(209) " H7>MH$ &,
(210) . "
(211)
(212)
(213) $ ;& ) . "
(214) " *"
(215)
(216) , "
(217) 1+ 2
(218) " $ A&
(219)
(220) *, "
(221)
(222) 4
(223) = 60
(224)
(225) *
(226) " " "
(227) "
(228) 3.2 Flood hazard and flood risk maps 3.2.1 General definition. characteristics. and. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0710006. 3. legislative. ) + -
(229) * 1+ 2
(230) " 0
(231) . 5 * 0 34-
(232) 6, " - *
(233) 7
(234)
(235)
(236) $ :& 0 - *"$! ,! & 0
(237)
(238) H * ;C CF1 F
(239) N 1 ! " ; . . - 4 L) *L6 $! & 1+ 0 *
(240) -E
(241) - . . 5
(242) , + -
(243) ,
(244) 3 -
(245) 0
(246) * " 1+ 9
(247)
(248) " H " ! 0
(249) -
(250) * "
(251)
(252) * " 1+ * @. Figure 1. Simplified scheme of flood hazard and risk mapping (Ri...flood hazard; IPi...flood intensity of a given flood scenario; pi...probability of occurrence of flood scenario; Ni...return period in years). Source of maps [8].. ) ,
(253) " *
(254) 0
(255) " 9 *
(256)
(257) + 4
(258)
(259) .
(260)
(261) * ) , $! ,! &6 0 +
(262) "" * 0 + " - 3 59* . 3.2.2 The creation process of flood hazard and flood risk maps 0 + -
(263) $!!& 4 6, " 0 B < - 2 7 ,
(264) " > ,
(265) 0 3. 7* + -
(266) - , -
(267)
(268)
(269) . 3.
(270) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 10006 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0710006. *, . ::; *
(271)
(272) 7 ::; "
(273)
(274) 3 ! " 1+ 0
(275) "
(276)
(277)
(278) 3 " 1+ $!& "
(279) "
(280) .
(281)
(282) 3 I ,
(283)
(284) "" "-
(285)
(286)
(287) $!&
(288)
(289)
(290) 7
(291) L L " - . . $!:,= &0
(292) <<1
(293) ?.
(294) ?. 2 . . - - 1+ 2
(295) " , 5 )20$= &0 . " B7? 7 - 3 + -B,
(296) *9
(297) , 9 # "# O -P#
(298) 8QR *#
(299) 0
(300) *
(301) " ,
(302) *
(303)
(304) 7 + $= & ) *
(305) 7 :
(306) *"
(307) " 0 1+ .
(308) 41N6
(309) .
(310)
(311)
(312) "
(313) 7
(314) 0 , 0 .
(315) *"
(316) " " " $=!& > : * "8 ?" 9 *
(317) * 0 " * "
(318)
(319) * . * $=!& 0
(320)
(321)
(322) * + 4 S +, S +,!S +,=S +60 *"
(323)
(324) + $==&7 " *
(325) *"
(326) 4 )!6
(327) " . . . $!=&0 * +*3
(328) . " 0 + *
(329) " *
(330) . " 0 +
(331) -
(332) 0 -
(333) J@, J , J , J@ 3 + 4 + * . * 6 ?" 9 *" " 4 *,
(334) , 6
(335) " - * .
(336) 0 3
(337) " - -
(338) 4 6 7
(339) 3
(340) " - *" 0 *
(341)
(342) )
(343) * *
(344)
(345) . *"
(346)
(347) " 0 0 "-$! & 3.2.3 Availability and use ) - +
(348) *" 1 - +
(349) $! & > * , "
(350) "
(351) . " 4
(352) " " " - 6
(353) 4 67
(354) * "
(355) "
(356) -
(357) 0 "-$A& , * , - +
(358)
(359) -
(360) 0 + -
(361) *
(362)
(363) , "
(364) 1+ 2
(365) " ,
(366)
(367)
(368) 3.3 Insurance map )
(369) 4 ) 6,
(370) " : $!;&, "
(371) " +
(372)
(373) 4 "
(374) 60 * 9 *
(375) " 5
(376)
(377)
(378) *
(379) . *
(380) - 0
(381)
(382)
(383)
(384) 1+ *- :@ $!A&,
(385) ". 3.3.1 Availability and use )
(386) *" 1+ 7 . " $=@& N ",
(387)
(388) " " ,
(389)
(390) "
(391) " , *, , ,
(392) "
(393)
(394) 1+ 7 .
(395)
(396) . 4.
(397) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 10006 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0710006.
(398) . " 3
(399) ) - "
(400) $=:& ,
(401) . "
(402)
(403) - +
(404) "
(405)
(406) ,
(407) . "
(408)
(409) 1+ . "
(410)
(411) - * * -
(412)
(413) 0 , " *, * - 0 "
(414) . " +
(415) L L " * 0
(416)
(417) L L 3 " - " 7
(418) " "
(419) *
(420) 3
(421) " + 7
(422) .
(423)
(424) 4
(425) * " "
(426) 6 $@ & > ,
(427)
(428) " ,
(429) * + 3
(430) " *,
(431)
(432) "
(433) " $ @&, " "
(434) , * + ,
(435) "5
(436) 0 *
(437)
(438) - * 0
(439) "
(440)
(441) * + , + -
(442) " " -
(443) . *
(444) . "
(445) * * 1+ 7 . "
(446)
(447) " < F* 1+ 2
(448) " .
(449) 7
(450) "
(451)
(452) $= & Figure 2. A preview of the insurance map [45]. . 4.2 Up-to-dateness of published maps. Figure 3. A preview of the report [45].. 0
(453) ) - +
(454) . " F
(455) 4 =
(456)
(457) $! &61+ * "
(458)
(459)
(460)
(461) ,
(462) " .
(463)
(464)
(465) 1+ 7 . " 0
(466) " 5 -
(467)
(468)
(469)
(470) 0 " , " *,
(471) " *"
(472)
(473)
(474) *,
(475)
(476) - * 3
(477) " " > "** " 1+ 2
(478) " ,> 7 "
(479)
(480) J - * " $@ , A&, . $ ;& 0 3
(481) 5 U , . 4 Discussion 7 . 3
(482) .
(483)
(484) "
(485)
(486) "
(487) " -
(488) " E
(489) ,
(490) 5 5. ,
(491)
(492) 4.1 Interconnection of flood maps )
(493) "
(494)
(495) 7 " -
(496) 3
(497) -
(498) " 0 " .
(499) 4 $=;,=A&6 3
(500) 5 T $=:&
(501) , + -. 5.
(502) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 10006 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. * * 3
(503) *
(504) + -
(505) 7
(506) .
(507) 3
(508) 0
(509) *
(510) "
(511) . "* * " *,
(512)
(513) *
(514) * + H * "
(515)
(516) 0
(517) H7>MH * $ ;&
(518)
(519) " < $!!& +
(520)
(521) " " * " 0 3
(522) "
(523)
(524) $ A,@@,@ & ) +
(525)
(526)
(527) ?. *, , , " 4 + *6 " * "
(528)
(529) 0 " "
(530) 3 $@ ,=:,! & >
(531) " "
(532) "
(533)
(534) 0 "- $A& " * " . 5 5 5$! ,A&4
(535) ) )=6 . * "
(536) *" "
(537) * $ & , . 3
(538) "
(539)
(540) H7>MH
(541)
(542) * 8
(543)
(544) 3 .
(545) " * 7
(546) 9 " ,
(547) " < F* 1+ 2
(548) " 9
(549)
(550)
(551) "
(552) 0 " 9
(553) " -
(554) )
(555)
(556) *" "8
(557)
(558) $A& 4.3 Interpretation of map contents 7
(559) *
(560)
(561) , . "
(562) " " 3
(563)
(564) " . 3
(565) *
(566) " *,
(567) " .
(568) 5 9 4 J , J@ ,J 6 *
(569) " $=:,@ ,@!& 7
(570) " * 5 9
(571) " -**"" +* 4 , , , 6)
(572)
(573) , + -
(574) " * 59 0
(575) " 5 9 " 1+ 2
(576) " 0 " 9 * 9 " 0 "- " * 4
(577) 6 " 5 5 $ & 0
(578) 3
(579) 5 5 " ,
(580)
(581) - " * *
(582) *. .
(583) "
(584) " $=:&
(585) , . "
(586) " $=:& " " -
(587) " 3
(588)
(589) 59 * * 4
(590) 6 4.4 Technical accuracy). implementation. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0710006.
(591)
(592) +
(593) 5 5 5 4 +*6? E
(594) $A& 0
(595)
(596)
(597) -
(598) " $=:& 0 -
(599) " ,
(600)
(601) +
(602) ,*
(603)
(604) ? +
(605) -
(606)
(607) $@=& 7
(608)
(609) * "
(610) "
(611) 4 )!67 *
(612) *
(613) *
(614) . (visualization,. 7
(615)
(616)
(617) , "
(618) $@!,@=&<
(619) " $! & 5T $=:& . 6.
(620) E3S Web of Conferences 7, 10006 (2016) FLOODrisk 2016 - 3rd European Conference on Flood Risk Management. DOI: 10.1051/ e3sconf/2016 0710006.
(621) . "
(622)
(623)
(624) " "
(625) " . 0 * -
(626) "
(627) 7 . -
(628)
(629)
(630)
(631) <
(632) "
(633) ,
(634) *5
(635) *
(636) . " - < *, + -
(637) "
(638)
(639) $! & E; @ " 3 . "
(640) 7 , -
(641) *
(642)
(643) + , ,
(644) 0
(645) " " 9
(646)
(647) . 6 Acknowledgements 0 -
(648)
(649) "
(650) 8 .<U7CC ! @C @ 7 * # ## #
(651) #
(652) V'. 7 References >, F 4 @6
(653) , 1 "E1 "U* N. ,!
(654) < B,>4 =6
(655)
(656) , G E ,
(657) ,
(658)
(659) ! ! <P+W# M'# N #
(660) 8QR *# #
(661) " -#
(662) * X40 * . 64 6,
(663)
(664)
(665)
(666) ! X,
(667) , ,
(668)
(669) =S@,1+ = YW# Z'W# TP-PW# <'W# # TQ
(670) P-W# G'# [ '\# 4 =6 "#
(671) $%%$ !
(672) ! & ! '!,1+ 2
(673) " E< F* 1+ 2
(674) " ,==
(675) @ <]N124 6 (#! )* +, - ,. /' 0& ! 1 ! (#)2,4 6*"E
(676) ECC +
(677) +C1 @;=@A ) H1;C +C ^ ^
(678) * C_)7GFCM^ ^
(679) * ^ = :
(680) , 4 . E @ Z 6, 1+ <]F 12 4 6 3!! * . , ) ! ) * +, /
(681) !
(682) )4., ! ! ! *. + . ! *.5 46 "! 1 ! , & ! '! 7
(683) # 6! ! 8 ,9 ) :
(684)
(685) 2, 4 6 *" E
(686) ECC +C
(687) " C"C +C * 5 + *C-
(688) 55 C-
(689) 5 5
(690) " -5 ,4 . E @ Z 6,1+ ; <]N 12 4 6 (#! ;,! 4 /
(691) ) <(#! 1,= (
(692) > , & ! '!2, 4 6 *" E
(693) ECC +
(694) +C1 @;@ F !> :A>CC + ^
(695) " ^ ^ C_)7GFCT<5?)?H^12^F5 ! ;
(696) ,4 . E @ Z 6 A T Q *PW#T'#[/`%/\'#" ) #! ! . .? )<")
(697)
(698) ) #!
(699)
(700) = ?
(701) @,
(702) , ::
(703) , 4 6 *" E
(704) ECC +C C ; =:C
(705) ^ C,4 . E @ Z 6,1+ : , B, 2, , >, 1 T -, 1 4 6 0 -
(706)
(707)
(708) 3 5
(709) * + , '
(710) )
(711)
(712) ,
(713) , ,
(714)
(715) =:S @. 5 Conclusion )
(716) * "
(717)
(718) 1+ 2
(719) "
(720) +
(721)
(722) *"
(723) " 0 -
(724) -
(725) "
(726) *
(727) * - 4 56 "
(728) *
(729)
(730) 0
(731)
(732) *
(733)
(734) * *, * " " . + -
(735)
(736) " 4 .
(737) +
(738) "
(739)
(740) -
(741) 6 0
(742) "
(743)
(744) " 5
(745)
Documenti correlati
Mass Array Sequenom platform was used to analyse genetic status of 18 cancer-related genes in 25 archival tumor specimens from metastatic lesions and available primary matched
Accordingly, luciferase assays employing coexpression of human TCF3, TCF4, or TCF12 with equal amounts of wild-type and mutant BHLHA9 demonstrated a decrease in reporter
Further research tried to understand the nature of the victim– stalker relationship and previous domestic violence (defined as “any violence between current or former partners in
Antonio nella chiesa del Rodolfo Tanzi e aveva messo le sue mani in quelle del rettore che, a nome proprio e degli altri fratres e sorores presenti, l’aveva accettata come soror e
Mais si les humanistes n'ont pas hésité à emprunter ces chemins déjà balisés et sans cesse parcourus par des milieux qui n'étaient pas humanistes, ils y ont
Due to unfavourable circumstances the sub-faculty was moved to the Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady in 1988, where, until 1996, it collaborated with the Institute of Forensic
Nevertheless, populations of certain indigenous species occurring in this territory may be considered isolated from other parts of the distribution range (Sorex alpinus,
Four species of the dormouse family (Myoxidae) are represented in the Czech mammal fauna: the edible or fat dormouse (Myoxus glis), the garden dormouse
