• Non ci sono risultati.

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales"

Copied!
49
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

Statistical Bulletin 03/15 Edited by: Deborah Lader July 2015

Second edition

(2)

(UUDWD

Section 1.5 of the bulletin has been updated after a production issue during the statistical significance testing phase was identified and resolved.

(3)

Further information

This release examines the extent and trends in illicit drug use among a nationally representative sample of 16 to 59 year olds resident in households in England and Wales, and is based on results from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW).

The release covers the following topics:

Extent and trends in illicit drug use among adults, including separate analysis of young adults (16 to 24 year olds);

Frequency of illicit drug use in the last year;

Illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors;

Use of new psychoactive substances (NPS), so-called ‘legal highs’;

Simultaneous polydrug and polysubstance use among adults aged 16 to 59;

Older drug users (featuring analysis of data from several survey years);

Drug use within generations over time (a pseudo-cohort analysis);

While responsibility for the CSEW transferred to the Office for National Statistics on 1 April 2012, the Home Office has retained responsibility for analysis and publication of this Drug Misuse publication.

The User Guide to Drug Misuse Statistics provides background information on the CSEW self- completion module on drug use, as well as classifications of different drugs and other information pertaining specifically to the Drug Misuse statistical collection. The User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales (published by the Office for National Statistics) provides further information on demographic and area classifications, and statistical conventions and methodology.

Copies of other Home Office publications are available on the Home Office pages of the Gov.uk website: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office/series/drug-misuse-declared The dates of forthcoming publications are pre-announced and can be found on the Statistics Release Calendar pages of the Gov.uk website: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/announcements For further information about the CSEW, please email crimestatistics@ons.gsi.gov.uk

Home Office Responsible Statistician

David Blunt, Chief Statistician and Head of Profession for Statistics Contact via crimestats@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk

This statistical bulletin is produced to the highest professional standards and is free from political interference. It has been produced by statisticians working in the Home Office Statistics Unit in accordance with the Home Office’s statement of compliance with the Code of Practice for Official Statistics, which covers Home Office policy on revisions and other matters. The Chief Statistician, as Head of Profession, reports to the National Statistician with respect to all professional statistical matters and oversees all Home Office National Statistics products with respect to the Code, being responsible for their timing, content and methodology.

Please fill in this short online feedback survey to help us improve this bulletin.

(4)

Contents

Page

Conventions used in figures and tables ... i

List of figures and tables ... ii

1 Extent and trends in illicit drug use ... 1

Daria Gromyko 1.1 Extent and trends in overall drug use and Class A drug use ... 1

1.2 Extent and trends in individual drug use ... 3

1.3 Last year use of khat ... 5

1.4 Last year use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) ... 5

1.5 Last year use of prescription-only painkillers ... 5

1.6 Last month use of illicit drugs ... 5

1.7 Use of illicit drugs ever ... 6

1.8 Sources of drugs used on last occasion ... 7

1.9 Summary of trends ... 7

2 Frequency of illicit drug use in the last year ... 8

Eleanor Andrews 2.1 Extent of frequent use of any drug, and cannabis (2014/15) ... 8

2.2 Frequency of individual drug use (2013/14 and 2014/15) ... 9

2.3 Trends in individual drug use ... 10

3 Illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors ... 12

Giles Stephenson 3.1 Extent and trends in illicit drug use by age group ... 12

3.2 Extent and trends in illicit drug use by sex ... 13

3.3 Extent and trends in illicit drug use by sex and age ... 14

3.4 Extent of illicit drug use by lifestyle factors ... 14

3.5 Extent of illicit drug use by area factors ... 15

3.6 Extent of prescription painkiller misuse by personal and household factors ... 16

(5)

4 New psychoactive substances (NPS)... 17

Daria Gromyko

4.1 Extent of NPS use ... 18

4.2 Use of NPS by lifestyle factors ... 19

4.3 Other findings ... 21

5 Simultaneous polydrug and polysubstance use ... 22

Deborah Lader

5.1 Extent of simultaneous polydrug use ... 22

5.2 Composition of simultaneous polydrug use ... 23

5.3 Simultaneous polydrug use involving two or more non-cannabis drugs ... 24

5.4 Simultaneous polysubstance use ... 25

5.5 Characteristics of simultaneous polydrug users ... 25

5.6 Reasons for simultaneous drug use ... 25

Annex A Older drug users (2013/14) ... 27

Giles Stephenson

A.1 Extent and trends in illicit drug use – older and younger users ... 28

A.2 Extent and trends in illicit drug use by drug type ... 28

A.3 Frequency of drug use ... 30

A.4 Age of onset ... 32

Annex B Drug use within generations over time ... 34

Giles Stephenson and Jacqueline Hoare

B.1 Generational effects on overall drug use ... 34

B.2 Generational effects on cannabis, powder cocaine and ecstasy use ... 35

Technical Annex ... 37

T.1 Interpreting the figures ... 37

T.2 Re-weighting the CSEW ... 39

T.3 Pseudo-cohort analysis ... 40

T.4 Other data sources ... 40

(6)

i

Conventions used in figures and tables

Table abbreviations

‘0’ indicates no response in that particular category or less than 0.5% (this does not apply when percentages are presented to one decimal point).

‘n/a’ indicates that the question was not applicable or not asked in that particular year.

‘-’ indicates that data are not reported because the unweighted base is fewer than 50.

‘**’ indicates that the change is statistically significant at the five per cent level. Where an apparent change over time is not statistically significant this is noted in the text.

Unweighted base

All percentages and rates presented in the tables are based on data weighted to compensate for differential non response. Tables show the unweighted base which represents the number of people interviewed in the specified group.

Percentages

Row or column percentages may not add to 100% due to rounding.

Most tables present cell percentages where the figures refer to the percentage of people who have the attribute being discussed and the complementary percentage, to add to 100%, is not shown.

A percentage may be quoted in the text for a single category that is identifiable in the tables only by summing two or more component percentages. In order to avoid rounding errors, the percentage has been recalculated for the single category and therefore may differ by one percentage point from the sum of the percentages derived from the tables.

‘No answers’ (missing values)

All analysis excludes don’t know/refusals unless otherwise specified.

Numbers of CSEW drug users

Estimates are rounded to the nearest 10,000.

(7)

ii

List of figures and tables

Page 1 Extent and trends in illicit drug use

Figure 1.1 Trends in illicit drug use in the last year among adults, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24

year olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW ... 2 Figure 1.2 Proportion of adults using cannabis in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year

olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW ... 3 Figure 1.3 Proportion of adults using powder cocaine in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16 to

24 year olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW ... 4 Figure 1.4 Proportion of adults using ecstasy in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year

olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW ... 4 Table 1 Last year drug use among adults aged 16 to 59 and young adults aged 16 to

24, with a summary of trends, 2014/15 CSEW ... 7 2 Frequency of illicit drug use in the last year

Figure 2.1 Frequency of any drug used, adults aged 16 to 59 and 16 to 24, 2014/15

CSEW ... 9 Figure 2.2 Frequency of drug use by individual drug type, adults aged 16 to 59 who took

the drug in the last year, 2013/14 CSEW ... 10 Figure 2.3 Trends in the proportion of drug users considered frequent users of cannabis,

ecstasy and powder cocaine, 2003/04 to 2014/15 CSEW ... 11 3 Illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors Figure 3.1 Proportion of 16 to 59 year olds using any drug in the last year by age group,

1996 to 2014/15 CSEW ... 13 Figure 3.2 Proportion of 16 to 59 year olds reporting use of selected drugs in the last year

by sex, 1996 to 2014/15 CSEW ... 14 Figure 3.3 Proportion of 16 to 59 year olds reporting use of selected drugs in the last year

by frequency of alcohol consumption, 1996 to 2014/15 CSEW ... 15 4 New psychoactive substances (NPS)

Figure 4.1 Prevalence of NPS use ever and in the last year, by sex, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24

year olds, 2014/15 CSEW ... 18 Table 2 NPS use in the last year by use of an illicit drug in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16

to 24 year olds, 2014/15 CSEW ... 19 Table 3 NPS use in the last year by frequency of visits to a nightclub or disco in the last

month, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 2014/15 CSEW ... 20 Table 4 NPS use in the last year by frequency of visits to a pub or wine bar in the last

month, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 2014/15 CSEW ... 20 Table 5 NPS use in the last year by frequency of alcohol consumption in the last month,

16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 2014/15 CSEW ... 20

(8)

iii

Figure 4.2 Sources of NPS and other illicit drugs on the last occasion they were used by adults aged 16 to 59, who had used NPS or other illicit drugs in the last year,

2014/15 CSEW ... 21

5 Simultaneous polydrug and polysubstance use

Figure 5.1 Composition of drug use the last time drugs were used among adults aged 16

to 59, 2013/14 and 2014/15 combined, CSEW ... 23 Figure 5.2 Composition of drug use the last time drugs were used among adults aged 16

to 59, by drug, 2013/14 and 2014/15 combined, CSEW ... 24 Figure 5.3 Main reason for taking the particular combination of drugs the last time drugs

were used among adults aged 16 to 59, 2013/14 and 2014/15 combined,

CSEW ... 26

Annex A Older drug users (2013/14)

Figure A.1 Proportion of 16 to 39 and 40 to 59 year olds using any drug in the last year,

1996 to 2014/15, CSEW ... 28 Figure A.2 Proportion of 40 to 59 year olds using cannabis in the last year, 1996 to

2014/15 CSEW ... 29 Table 6 Proportion of 16 to 39 and 40 to 59 year old last year cannabis users using

skunk, and other types of cannabis, 2013/14, CSEW ... 29 Figure A.3 Proportion of 40 to 59 year olds using powder cocaine and ecstasy in the last

year, 1996 to 2014/15 CSEW ... 30 Figure A.4 Frequency of individual drug use in the last year, adults aged 16 to 39 and 40

to 59 who took the drug in the last year, 2012/13 and 2013/14 combined,

CSEW ... 31 Table 7 Frequency of cannabis use in the last year, adults aged 16 to 39 and 40 to 59

who took cannabis in the last year, 2012/13 and 2013/14 combined, CSEW ... 31 Figure A.5 Most common (modal) age when 16 to 39 year olds and 40 to 59 year olds who

had ever reported taking powder cocaine, ecstasy or cannabis, reported first

taking each type of drug, 2011/12, CSEW ... 32 Figure A.6 Proportion of 40 to 59 year old cannabis, powder cocaine, and ecstasy users

who first took each drug at each age, 2011/12, CSEW ... 33

Annex B Drug use within generations over time

Figure B.1 Proportion of adults using any drug in the last year, by age cohort, 1996 to

2014/15, CSEW ... 34 Figure B.2 Proportion of adults using cannabis in the last year, by age cohort, 1996 to

2014/15, CSEW ... 35 Figure B.3 Proportion of adults using powder cocaine in the last year, by age cohort, 1996

to 2014/15, CSEW ... 36 Figure B.4 Proportion of adults using ecstasy in the last year, by age cohort, 1996 to

2014/15, CSEW ... 36

Technical Annex

Table 8 Progression of age cohorts through CSEW years ... 40

(9)

1

1 Extent and trends in illicit drug use

INTRODUCTION

This chapter covers the extent and trends in illicit drug use among adults aged 16 to 59 measured by the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW). Figures for young adults aged 16 to 24 are also provided. Figures are presented since 1996, when comparable questions were first included on the survey.

The 2014/15 survey measured levels of drug use in the last month and in the last year prior to interview, as well as drug use at any point in the respondent’s lifetime. The questions on last year use and use ever are regularly included in the CSEW. The questions on last month use were previously included in the 2011/12 survey, and provide a measure of the recency of drug use. In the 2014/15 survey these questions have replaced questions on the frequency of drug use for most individual drug types, except cannabis.

The User Guide to Drug Misuse Statistics provides further details relating to illicit drug use measures.

The User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales (published by the Office for National Statistics) provides further information on demographic and area classifications, and statistical conventions and methodology.

Estimates of illicit drug use among adults from the 2014/15 CSEW can be found in the data tables.

KEY FINDINGS

Around 1 in 12 (8.6%) adults aged 16 to 59 had taken an illicit drug in the last year. This equated to around 2.8 million people. This level of drug use was similar to the 2013/14 survey (8.8%), but significantly lower than a decade ago (11.2% in the 2004/05 survey).

Around 1 in 5 (19.4%) young adults aged 16 to 24 had taken an illicit drug in the last year.

This proportion was more than double that of the wider age group, and equated to around 1.2 million people. This level of drug use was similar to the 2013/14 survey (19.0%), but significantly lower compared with a decade ago (26.5% in the 2004/05 survey).

The use of ecstasy in the last year increased among 16 to 24 year olds between the 2013/14 and 2014/15 surveys, from 3.9 per cent to 5.4 per cent. This is an increase of approximately 95,000 people.

Last year use of khat among 16 to 59 year olds has fallen to 0.04 per cent. This is a significant fall compared with the 2011/12 estimate of 0.2 per cent, when khat use was last measured by the CSEW. Khat was legal prior to June 2014, when it became controlled as a Class C drug.

Around 1 in 20 (4.7%) adults aged 16 to 59 had taken an illicit drug in the last month, while one in ten (10.2%) young adults aged 16 to 24 had done so. Neither proportion has changed significantly compared with the 2011/12 survey, when the questions on last month use were last asked.

Just over one-third (34.7%) of adults aged 16 to 59 had taken drugs at some point during their lifetime. This is similar to the 2013/14 survey estimate (35.7%).

1.1 EXTENT AND TRENDS IN OVERALL DRUG USE AND CLASS A DRUG USE

This section summarises the long-term trends in last year use of drugs (of any kind) and Class A drugs, among adults aged 16 to 59 and young adults aged 16 to 24.

(10)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

2 Last year drug use among adults aged 16 to 59

The 2014/15 CSEW shows that around 1 in 12 (8.6%) adults aged 16 to 59 had taken an illicit drug in the last year, which equated to around 2.8 million people. This proportion is similar to the 2013/14 survey (8.8%), and to the 2011/12 survey (9.0%). This relative stability of the trend on either side of the 2012/13 survey figures suggests that the low point observed in the 2012/13 survey (8.1%) may be an outlier, likely to have occurred due to random sampling variability. The trend since the 2009/10 survey has fluctuated between eight and nine per cent, but has remained relatively flat, so levels of drug use are generally stable.

This follows a period of gradually decreasing proportions from a peak in 2003/04 (12.2%). Prior to 2003/04, the proportion remained broadly flat at around 12 per cent.

According to the 2014/15 CSEW, 3.2 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 had taken a Class A drug in the last year, equivalent to just over one million people. The long-term trend in Class A drug use has been broadly stable over the last few years, although there has been some fluctuation. Since 2009/10, the only statistically significant changes were the fall in 2012/13 and the subsequent rise in 2013/14, showing a return to the previous level. However, the current level of last year Class A drug use is significantly higher than in 1996, when 2.7 per cent of adults used Class A drugs. This change is largely accounted for by a significant increase in cocaine use (from 0.6% to 2.4%), offset by a significant fall in the use of hallucinogens (from 1.3% to 0.7%). For further detailed figures, see Tables 1.02 and 1.04.

Last year drug use among young adults aged 16 to 24

The proportion of young adults aged 16 to 24 taking any drug in the last year was more than double the proportion in the 16 to 59 age group, at 19.4 per cent. This proportion equates to 1.2 million people. This was similar to the levels seen in the 2013/14 (19.0%) and 2011/12 (19.7%) surveys, while the 2012/13 figure (16.4%) looks anomalous within the general longer term trend.

The 2014/15 CSEW found that 7.6 per cent of young adults aged 16 to 24 had taken a Class A drug in the last year, equating to 474,000 people. The apparent increase of the proportion from 6.2 per cent in 2013/14 was not statistically significant. For further detailed figures, see Tables 1.06 and 1.08.

Figure 1.1: Trends in illicit drug use in the last year among adults, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 years old, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW

Source: Home Office: Tables 1.02 and 1.06.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Percentages

Any drug (16–24) Any drug (16–59)

Any Class A drug (16–24) Any Class A drug (16–59)

(11)

1. Extent and trends in illicit drug use

3

1.2 EXTENT AND TRENDS IN INDIVIDUAL DRUG USE

Cannabis

As in previous years, cannabis was the most commonly used drug in the last year, with 6.7 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 using it in the last year, similar to the 2013/14 survey (6.6%; Figure 1.2). Over the longer-term, between the 1998 and 2003/04 surveys, the last year use of cannabis was stable, at around 10 per cent of adults, before falling to 6.5 per cent in 2009/10. The trend since the 2009/10 survey has been relatively flat, at between six and seven per cent (Table 1.02).

Among younger adults aged 16 to 24, cannabis was also the most commonly used drug, with 16.3 per cent having used it in the last year. This was not statistically significantly different from the level in 2013/14 (15.1%), but was a significant fall compared with the 1996 survey (25.8%).

Although the trend in the use of cannabis among 16 to 24 year olds appears to have shown a steady increase compared with the 2012/13 survey, it is too early to conclude that this is an emerging pattern at this stage. The estimates from the 2012/13 survey appear to be out of line with recent results, and a comparison of the latest estimate to previous years may indicate that the trend, which has been falling since the peak in 1998, has gradually stabilised (Table 1.06).

Figure 1.2: Proportion of adults using cannabis in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW

Source: Home Office: Tables 1.02 and 1.06.

Powder cocaine

As in recent years, the next most commonly used drug in the last year by adults aged 16 to 59 was powder cocaine (2.3% in the 2014/15 survey). By contrast, powder cocaine is the third most commonly used drug among young adults aged 16 to 24 (4.8%), after ecstasy (see below). Compared with the previous year, both proportions have remained similar (2.4% among 16 to 59 year olds and 4.2% among 16 to 24 year olds in the 2013/14 survey).

Powder cocaine use among 16 to 59 year olds rose sharply between the 1996 and 2000 surveys (0.6% to 2.0%), driven by an even sharper increase among the 16 to 24 age group (1.3% to 5.2%).

These sharp increases were followed by slower increases to a peak in the trends for both age groups in the 2008/09 survey: 3.0 per cent among 16 to 59 year olds and 6.5 per cent among 16 to 24 year olds. Although the latest figures from the 2014/15 survey represent increases for both age groups compared with the 1996 survey, both are significantly lower compared with the 2008/09 figures.

While the estimates from the 2014/15 survey for both age groups are significantly higher than the 2012/13 survey, the estimates from 2012/13 look to be out of line with recent results. The estimates from the 2014/15 survey are not statistically significantly different from those seen in the 2013/14 and 2011/12 surveys, which suggests that the fall in cocaine usage since 2008/9 may be levelling out.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Percentages

16–24 16–59

(12)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

4

Figure 1.3: Proportion of adults using powder cocaine in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW

Source: Home Office: Tables 1.02 and 1.06.

Ecstasy

The level of last year ecstasy use by adults aged 16 to 59 in the 2014/15 survey (1.7%) was similar to the previous year (1.6%), and the same as that seen in the 1996 survey (1.7%, Figure 1.4). The proportion of 16 to 59 year olds using ecstasy in the last year has fluctuated between 1 and 2 per cent since measurement began in 1996.

In the 2014/15 survey, the proportion of 16 to 24 year olds reporting ecstasy use in the last year was 5.4 per cent, a statistically significant increase compared with the 2013/14 survey (3.9%). Although the long-term trend in last year ecstasy use among young adults shows many fluctuations (Figure 1.4), the overall long-term direction before the recent increases was downward. It is too early to say whether the latest estimates show a change in the direction of the trend, or another fluctuation.

Figure 1.4: Proportion of adults using ecstasy in the last year, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 1996 to 2014/15, CSEW

Source: Home Office: Tables 1.02 and 1.06.

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Percentages

16–24 16–59

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Percentages

16–59 16–24

(13)

1. Extent and trends in illicit drug use

5 Other illicit drugs

For adults aged 16 to 59, there was a small statistically significant increase in last year use of magic mushrooms (0.4% of 16 to 59 year olds in the 2013/14 survey to 0.5% in the 2014/15 survey). There were no other statistically significant changes compared with the previous year. Similarly, there were no statistically significant changes in last year drug use among young adults aged 16 to 24 compared with the previous year, apart from the increase in ecstasy use (see above).

See ‘Summary of Trends’ tables below and Tables 1.02 and 1.06 for trends in last year drug use.

Over the long term there have been falls in the use of hallucinogens, amphetamines and cannabis among adults ages 16 to 59, offset by an increase in the use of powder cocaine.

1.3 LAST YEAR USE OF KHAT

Khat1 became controlled as a Class C drug on 24th June 2014 and a question on last year use of khat was included in the 2014/15 CSEW. Prior to this date, khat was not controlled, but questions on khat were asked in the 2010/11 and 2011/12 surveys The 2014/15 CSEW found that 0.04 per cent2 of adults aged 16 to 59 had used khat in the last year; this equates to around 15,000 people. This is a significant fall compared with 0.2 per cent in the previous two survey years when khat use was measured.

1.4 LAST YEAR USE OF NEW PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES (NPS)

The 2014/15 CSEW asked questions on the last year use of new psychoactive substances (NPS).

‘NPS’ refers to newly available drugs that mimic the effect of drugs such as cannabis, ecstasy and powder cocaine, and which may or may not be illegal to buy. These are discussed in Chapter 4.

Questions on the use of individual new psychoactive substances, or other substances not previously measured, have been included in some past surveys. These include salvia, nitrous oxide (‘laughing gas’), BZP (a stimulant similar to amphetamines), synthetic cannabinoids (‘spice’) and GHB/GBL.

Findings on the use of these substances are shown in previous Drug Misuse bulletins.

1.5 LAST YEAR USE OF PRESCRIPTION–ONLY PAINKILLERS

The 2014/15 CSEW included a question for the first time on the misuse of prescription-only painkillers3.The survey revealed that in the last year 5.4 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 had misused a prescription-only painkiller not prescribed to them. Breaking this down by age group, 7.2 per cent of 16 to 24 year olds had misused a prescription-only painkiller in the last year, while 4.9 per cent of 25 to 59 year olds had done so. The difference between the two age groups was statistically significant (figures not shown in tables).

Furthermore, of the 16 to 59 year olds who had reported misuse of prescription-only painkillers, a quarter (25%) reported having taken another drug in the last year. This is in contrast with users of new psychoactive substances (NPS), of whom more than four fifths (83%) had used another illicit drug in the last year (see Chapter 4). Further analysis of prescription-only painkiller misuse by demographic factors is shown in Chapter 3.

1.6 LAST MONTH USE OF ILLICIT DRUGS

Questions on the use of illicit drugs in the last month were last included in the 2011/12 survey. ‘Use in the last month’ is a good indicator of very recent drug use, but it is subject to more variation due to the small number of last month users. More detail is available in the data tables.

1 Estimates of khat use have not been included in the extent and trends tables. It is possible that a household survey such as the CSEW may underestimate the use of substances such as khat, the use of which is concentrated in individuals of a specific national origin. CSEW general population estimates may not adequately capture levels of the use of such drugs within such a small subgroup of the population.

2 The 2014/15 estimate of last year khat use should be treated with caution, as khat was not a controlled substance for part of the survey year. Depending on the time of the interview, some respondents were asked to recall a 12 month period in which khat was legal, while for others khat had been legal at the start of the 12 month period they were asked about but became illegal during the 12 month period.

3 The question on painkillers asked respondents whether they had taken prescription-only painkillers not prescribed to them, which they took only for the feeling or experience it gave them. The figures relating to painkillers are not shown in tables.

(14)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

6 According to the 2014/15 CSEW:

Around 4.7 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 said they had taken an illicit drug in the last month.

This equates to around 1.5 million people and is a significantly lower percentage than those observed a decade ago in the 2004/05 survey and when CSEW measurements began in 1996 (both 6.7%) (Tables 1.03 and 1.04).

The proportion of young adults aged 16 to 24 followed a similar pattern, although the proportion was 10.2 per cent, around double that of the wider age group. This equates to around 642,000 people aged 16 to 24 having taken a drug in the last month prior to interview. The 2014/15 survey proportion represents a significant fall compared with 16.4 per cent in the 2004/05 survey and 19.2 per cent in the 1996 survey (Tables 1.07 and 1.08).

1.4 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 and 3.2 per cent of young adults aged 16 to 24 had taken a Class A drug in the last month. These proportions are similar to those last observed in the 2011/12 survey and have not changed significantly compared with the 1996 survey.

Among adults aged 16 to 59, the drugs most commonly taken in the last month were cannabis (3.7%), powder cocaine (0.9%) and ecstasy (0.7%). Among adults aged 16 to 24, the drugs most commonly taken in the last month were cannabis (8.4%), ecstasy (2.1%) and powder cocaine (1.7%).

1.7 USE OF ILLICIT DRUGS EVER

Respondents were also asked about drugs they have ever used in their lifetime; this is different from last year drug use, which is intended to measure current drug use4. By contrast, use of a drug in a person’s lifetime may not have occurred recently. The measure of drug use ever in a person’s lifetime is likely to be affected by the ‘ageing population’ phenomenon: as people live longer, the 16 to 59 age group becomes more condensed at the older boundary, so with time there are likely to be more people who have taken drugs at some point in their lives. Detailed figures are in the data tables.

According to the 2014/15 CSEW, 36.5 per cent of young adults aged 16 to 24 had used an illicit drug at some point in their lives, while 19.4 per cent had done so in the last year. By contrast, among the wider age group of adults aged 16 to 59, a similar proportion (34.7%) had used an illicit drug in their lifetime, compared with only 8.6 per cent who had used an illicit drug in the last year. These comparisons provide evidence that drug use tends to begin relatively early in life, and that those who have used a drug at some point in their lives may not have done so recently.

The following key findings summarise the trend data on lifetime drug use among 16 to 59 year olds:

Around one third (34.7%) of adults aged 16 to 59 said they had taken an illicit drug in their lifetime, which equates to around 11.3 million people. This is a similar level to recent years (for example, 35.7% in 2013/14) but an increase from 30.4% in the 1996 survey. This is likely to be an effect of the ageing population, as last-year drug use has fallen compared with the 1996 survey, from 11.1 per cent to 8.6 per cent (Tables 1.01, 1.02 and 1.04).

15.5 per cent (5.1 million) adults aged 16 to 59 had taken a Class A drug in their lifetime, a statistically significant increase from 9.6 per cent in the 1996 survey. This is in line with a simultaneous increase in the use of Class A drugs in the last year, from 2.7 per cent in the 1996 survey to 3.2 per cent in the 2014/15 survey.

For all adults aged 16 to 59, the drug most commonly reported as ever used was cannabis, with around three in ten (29.2%) adults reporting using this drug at some point during their lifetime.

Furthermore, around one in ten adults aged 16 to 59 said that they had used amphetamines (10.3%), powder cocaine (9.7%), ecstasy (9.2%) or amyl nitrite (8.5%) in their lifetime.

4 Questions on the use of mephedrone ever were not included in the 2010/11 and the 2011/12 surveys. Therefore, the estimates of last year mephedrone use in 2010/11 and 2011/12 differ from the other individual illicit drugs, as respondents were not previously asked about their experience of ever using mephedrone. Any effect on the estimates of last year mephedrone use, or indeed on the overall measure of any last year drug use, would be considered to be very small.

(15)

1. Extent and trends in illicit drug use

7

1.8 SOURCES OF DRUGS USED ON LAST OCCASION

The 2014/15 CSEW also asked those respondents who had used drugs in the last year where, or from whom, they had obtained the drugs they had used on the last occasion (Table 1.095). The figures presented here do not include new psychoactive substances, which were asked about separately. A comparison of NPS sources with sources of other illicit drugs is shown in Figure 4.2 (Chapter 4).

The most popular source of drugs in 2014/15 was someone well-known, e.g. a friend, neighbour or colleague, accounting for just under half of occasions (42% for 16 to 59 year olds, 46% for 16 to 24 year olds). The second most popular source was a known dealer, accounting for just over one tenth of occasions (11% for 16 to 59 year olds and 13% for 16 to 24 year olds). This was followed in popularity by dealers who were not known personally (9% for 16 to 59 year olds and 12% for 16 to 24 year olds).

1.9 SUMMARY OF TRENDS

Table 1: Last year drug use among adults aged 16 to 59 and young adults aged 16 to 24, with a summary of trends, 2014/15 CSEW

Drug types Adults aged 16 to 59 Adults aged 16 to 24

Class

2014/15 compared with: 2014/15 compared with:

Proportion reporting

use (%) 1996 2004/05 2013/14

Proportion reporting

use (%) 1996 2004/05 2013/14

A Any cocaine 2.4 ↑ 4.8 ↑

Powder cocaine 2.3 ↑ 4.8 ↑

Crack cocaine 0.1 0.1

Ecstasy 1.7 5.4 ↑

Hallucinogens 0.7 ↓ ↓ 1.9

LSD 0.4 ↓ ↑ 1.2

Magic mushrooms 0.5 ↓ ↑ 1.5

Opiates 0.1 0.0

Heroin 0.1 0.0

Methadone 0.1 0.0

A/B Any amphetamine 0.6 n/a n/a 1.3 n/a n/a

Amphetamines 0.6 ↓ ↓ 1.3

Methamphetamine 0.1 n/a n/a 0.2 n/a n/a

B Cannabis 6.7 ↓ ↓ 16.3

Ketamine 0.5 n/a n/a 1.6 n/a n/a

Mephedrone 0.5 n/a n/a 1.9 n/a n/a

B/C Tranquillisers 0.5 0.7

C Anabolic steroids 0.2 ↑ 0.5

n/a Amyl nitrite 0.7 ↓ ↓ 1.4

Any Class A drug 3.2 7.6

Any stimulant drug 3.5 8.1

Any drug 8.6 19.4

Unweighted base 19,732 2,306

Table notes

Source: Home Office: Tables 1.02 and 1.05.

'Any drug' comprises powder cocaine, crack cocaine, ecstasy, LSD, magic mushrooms, ketamine, mephedrone, heroin, methadone, amphetamines, methamphetamine, cannabis, tranquillisers, anabolic steroids, amyl nitrite, any other pills/powders/drugs smoked.

Upward and downward arrows indicate statistically significant changes compared with the years shown.

‘n/a’ indicates that the drug concerned had not been measured by the survey in the comparison year.

5 The figures in Table 1.09 are not comparable with findings from this survey question published in earlier years, as the selections of drugs which respondents were prompted to recall in the preceding questions have changed between survey years.

The figures exclude those respondents who said they had misused prescription-only painkillers in the last year which were not prescribed to them, or refused to answer the question on painkiller misuse. This is in line with other composite measures of drug use in this report.

(16)

8

2. Frequency of illicit drug use in the last year

INTRODUCTION

This chapter investigates levels of frequent drug use which is defined as taking an illicit drug more than once a month in the last year, among adults aged 16 to 59 and young adults aged 16 to 24.

These analyses are based on either the results of the 2013/14 or the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW). This is because questions on frequency of drug use were only asked in the 2014/15 survey for use of cannabis and ‘any drug’. Therefore, 2013/14 survey data have been used to examine frequent use of individual drugs6, with the exception of cannabis. It is valid to interpret 2013/14 figures as current, given that it is unlikely frequent drug use has changed significantly since the last survey.

The measure of frequency of use for ‘any drug’ used for the 2014/15 survey is also calculated slightly differently than previously as it is based on one specific question that asks about frequency of any drug use. In previous years, frequent use was calculated using a composite variable made up of individual questions that ask about use for each individual drug in the survey. Therefore no direct comparisons have been made with previous year’s findings for frequent drug use.

The User Guide to Drug Misuse Statistics provides further details relating to illicit drug use measures, and changes made to the 2014/15 survey.

Estimates of frequent drug use in the last year among adults from the 2014/15 CSEW can be found in the data tables, for cannabis and any drug. Detailed estimates for frequent use of a selection of other individual drugs presented here are taken from the 2013/14 publication as the previous publication did not go into the same depth.

KEY FINDINGS

According to the 2014/15 CSEW, 2.2 per cent of all adults aged 16 to 59 were classed as frequent drug users.

The proportion of young adults aged 16 to 24 who were classed as frequent drug users was 5.1 per cent, over twice the proportion of all adults aged 16 to 59 in the 2014/15 survey.

Cannabis was the drug most likely to be frequently used, with 39 per cent of cannabis users being classed as frequent users in the 2014/15 survey. Tranquilisers were the second most likely drug type to be frequently used (27% of users reported frequent use in the 2013/14 survey – the most recent data available on frequency of using drugs other than cannabis).

2.1 EXTENT OF FREQUENT USE OF ANY DRUG, AND CANNABIS (2014/15)

Respondents who had taken any drug in the last year were asked how often they had taken them.

The change in the survey questions resulted in a larger number of ‘don’t know’ responses and refusals to answer the ‘any drug’ question, compared with previous years when the respondent was asked about the frequency of each drug individually. Therefore, trends in frequent use of any drug have not been presented as this year is not directly comparable with previous years.

Estimates from the 2014/15 CSEW show that 2.2 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 were defined as frequent drug users (having taken any illicit drug more than once a month on average in the last year) (Table 2.01). Frequent drug users made up just over a third (36%) of the adults who reported drug use

6 Not all drugs asked about in the survey are reported on, as the base number of respondents for each drug must be large enough to allow robust analysis of the frequency of use. For less common drugs, too few respondents reported using the drug in the last year to allow for this.

(17)

2. Frequency of illicit drug use in the last year

9

within the last year. Eight per cent of adults who reported using drugs in the last year, said they had used drugs every day (Table 2.02).

The proportion of 16 to 24 year olds defined as frequent drug users was over twice as high (5.1%) as the proportion of frequent drug users aged 16 to 59 (2.2%). However, similar proportions of 16 to 24 year olds and 16 to 59 year olds who had taken drugs in the last year were frequent drug users (36%

for both age groups). This pattern holds across all the frequency of use categories (Figure 2.1; Tables 2.01 and 2.02).

Figure 2.1 Frequency of any drug used, adults aged 16 to 59 and 16 to 24, 2014/15 CSEW

Source: Home Office: Table 2.02.

As reported in the previous chapter (Extent and trends in illicit drug use), cannabis was the most prevalent drug taken in the last year among adults aged 16 to 59 (7%, Table 1.02). Of those aged 16 to 59 using cannabis during the last year, 39 per cent reported frequent use of this drug. The equivalent proportion for young adults aged 16 to 24 was similar, at 37 per cent (Table 2.03).

2.2 FREQUENCY OF INDIVIDUAL DRUG USE (2013/14 AND 2014/15)

Respondents were asked how frequently they used each of the drugs that they said they had taken during the last year. These questions were not included in the latest survey, except for ‘any drug’ and cannabis; therefore, with the exception of cannabis, all of the figures presented are from the 2013/14 CSEW. The findings presented in 2013/14 Drug Misuse report have been expanded on here, by presenting a more detailed breakdown of the frequency of use (Figure 2.2).

Figure 2.2 shows that cannabis and tranquilisers were the drugs that have the highest proportion of frequent users (39% of cannabis users and 27% of tranquiliser users were frequent users). Other drugs such as powder cocaine (13%), mephedrone (8%), and ecstasy (4%) were used less frequently.

There were small proportions of daily users of drugs across all the drug types. Tranquilisers (13%) and Cannabis (9%) had the highest proportion of daily users. Figure 2.2 also shows that taking drugs

‘once or twice a year’ was the most common frequency across all drug types, particularly for mephedrone (71%), ketamine (70%) and amphetamines (70%).

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

Every Day 3 to 5 days per week

Once or twice a

week

2 or 3 times a month

Once a month

Once every couple of

months

Once or twice this

year

Percentage

Age 16-59 Age 16-24

Most

frequent Least

frequent

(18)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

10

Figure 2.2: Frequency of drug use by individual drug type, adults aged 16 to 59 who took the drug in the last year, 2013/141 CSEW

Chart notes

Source: Home Office: Table 2.04.

The figures for each individual drug type are taken from the latest survey year in which the relevant question has been asked.

For all the drugs except cannabis, this is 2013/14, for cannabis this is 2014/15.

The number of respondents who said that they had used other drugs in the last year was not high enough to produce robust results, but it appears that users of some of these drugs (e.g. methadone) were more likely to be daily users than the drug types presented in the chart.

2.3 TRENDS IN INDIVIDUAL DRUG USE

The CSEW can also be used to provide information on trends in the frequent use of drugs and analysis has been conducted for the three most popular illicit drugs (cannabis, powder cocaine and ecstasy). This analysis shows that the proportion of users of cannabis who were frequent users was relatively flat between the 2003/04 and 2013/14 surveys, although there is considerable fluctuation between survey years. The latest estimate, from the 2014/15 survey, shows that proportion of adults aged 16 to 59 that were frequent users of cannabis has dropped to 39 per cent, the lowest proportion since these questions were first asked. Given the considerable fluctuation between surveys and due to changes in the questions asked in the survey (questions relating to frequency of drug use were only asked about for cannabis and any drug in 2014/15), it is too early to say whether this is a real decrease or due to sampling variability or a question effect.

There have been more consistent decreases in the frequent use of powder cocaine and ecstasy (Figure 2.3). For example, in the 2006/07 survey, the proportion of frequent drug users of powder cocaine was 44 per cent. This has decreased to 13 per cent in 2013/14.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cannabis Tranquilisers Powder Cocaine Amyl Nitrite Amphetamines Ketamine Mephedrone Ecstasy

Percentage

Once or twice this year

Once every couple of months

Once a month

2 or 3 times a month

Once or twice a week

3 to 5 times a week

Every day

(19)

2. Frequency of illicit drug use in the last year

11

Figure 2.3 does not show information from the 2014/15 survey for powder cocaine and ecstasy because the relevant questions were not included in the questionnaire for this survey year.

Figure 2.3: Trends in the proportion of drug users considered frequent users of cannabis, ecstasy and powder cocaine, 2003/04 to 2014/15 CSEW

Chart notes

Source: Home Office: Table 2.05.

Data for 2010/11 are not available; see the Technical annex for more information.

No information is available from the 2014/15 survey for powder cocaine and ecstasy because the relevant questions were not included in the questionnaire for this survey year.

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Percentage

Cannabis

Ecstasy

Powder cocaine

(20)

12

3. Illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors

INTRODUCTION

This Chapter presents findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) on levels of illicit drug use in the last year by age, sex, frequency of nightclub and pub/wine bar visits, alcohol consumption and some area characteristics. Illicit drug use by additional personal, household and area characteristics are included in the data tables but are not commented on here. In addition to this chapter, further analysis focusing on older drug users is available in the annex Older Drug Users.

The User Guide to Drug Misuse Statistics provides further details relating to illicit drug use measures and definitions. Further information on demographic and area classifications is available in the User Guide to Crime Statistics for England and Wales, published by the Office for National Statistics.

Estimates of last year illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors from the 2014/15 CSEW, alongside long-term trends for certain characteristics can be found in the data tables.

KEY FINDINGS

Younger people are more likely to take drugs than older people. The level of any drug use in the last year was highest among 16 to 19 year olds (18.8%) and 20 to 24 year olds (19.8%).The level of drug use was much lower in the oldest age group (2.4% of 55 to 59 year olds).

Men are more likely to take drugs than women. Around one in eight (11.9%) men aged 16 to 59 had taken an illicit drug in the last year, compared with around one in eighteen (5.4%) women.

People living in urban areas reported higher levels of drug use than those living in rural areas. Just under a tenth (9.1%) of people living in urban areas had used any drug compared with 6.5 per cent of those living in rural areas.

Higher levels of drug use are associated with increased frequency of visits to pubs, bars and nightclubs. For example, use of any Class A drug in the last year was around 10 times higher among those who had visited a nightclub at least four times in the past month (19.2%) compared with those who had not visited a nightclub in the past month (1.8%). A similar pattern was found for those visiting pubs and bars more frequently.

3.1 EXTENT AND TRENDS IN ILLICIT DRUG USE BY AGE GROUP

As shown in previous years, the level of any drug use in the last year was highest among the youngest age groups; 18.8 per cent of 16 to 19 year olds and 19.8 per cent of 20 to 24 year olds reported any drug use in the last year. Levels of illicit drug use then decreased as age increased, from 12.5 per cent of those aged 25 to 29 to 2.4 per cent of 55 to 59 year olds (Table 3.01).

Across all drug types, levels of use in the last year were highest among the youngest age groups, and with the exception of ketamine, specifically those aged 20 to 24. However, not all differences between adjacent age groups were statistically significant, with levels of use in the last year being at similar levels for 16 to 19 year olds for some drug types (hallucinogens, amphetamines, cannabis, mephedrone, ketamine, and amyl nitrite).

Class A drug use was highest among 20 to 24 year olds with 9.4 per cent reporting use of these types of drugs in the last year and lowest among 55 to 59 year olds with 0.3 per cent reporting use of these types of drugs in the last year.

(21)

3. Illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors

13

Between the 1996 and 2014/15 surveys, last year use of any illicit drug fell. This was largely due to the declines in illicit drug use among 16 to 24 year olds, and to a lesser extent, 25 to 29 year olds. (as shown in Figure 3.1). Over the same period, there have been increases in any drug use among older drug users, with last year use of any illicit drug among 55 to 59 year olds increasing from 1.0 per cent in the 1996 survey, to 2.4 per cent in the 2014/15 survey. The increase in any illicit drug use among 55 to 59 year olds has primarily been driven by increases in the use of cannabis, although use of all types of drugs among this age group is still low compared with younger age groups (Table 3.04).

Figure 3.1: Proportion of 16 to 59 year olds using any drug in the last year by age group, 1996 to 2014/15 CSEW

Source: Home Office: Table 3.04.

3.2 EXTENT AND TRENDS IN ILLICIT DRUG USE BY SEX

Levels of illicit drug use during the last year were higher among men than women in according to the 2014/15 survey, a pattern that has existed since the 1996 survey. According to the 2014/15 survey, 11.9 per cent of men reported taking an illicit drug in the last year, compared with 5.4 per cent of women.

According to the 2014/15 survey, men were more than twice as likely to report the use of cannabis in the last year than women (9.5% of men had used cannabis in the last year, compared with 4.0% of women). Men were almost three times as likely to take powder cocaine and ecstasy than women in the last year (Figure 3.2; Table 3.01).

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

Percentage

16–19 20–24 25–29 30–34 35–44 45–54 55–59

(22)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

14

Figure 3.2: Proportion of 16 to 59 year olds reporting use of selected drugs in the last year by sex, 2014/15 CSEW

Source: Home Office: Table 3.05.

There were no statistically significant changes between the 2013/14 and 2014/15 surveys for both men and women.

Since 1996, there have been falls in the use of hallucinogens, amphetamines, cannabis and any drug, but an increase in the use of powder cocaine, among both men and women. (Table 3.05)

3.3 EXTENT AND TRENDS IN ILLICIT DRUG USE BY SEX AND AGE

Following the patterns seen in illicit drug use by sex and age, levels of illicit drug use during the last year were highest among younger men (16 to 19 and 20 to 24 year olds) and lowest in older women (55 to 59 year olds) in 2014/15.

Around one in four men aged 16 to 19 and 20 to 24 (22.6% and 26.5%) reported using any illicit drug in the last year, compared with one in a hundred women aged 55 to 59 (0.9%). (Table 3.02)

Similarly, use of any Class A drug was highest among men aged 20 to 24 (14.0% reported use in the last year).

Over the past ten years (since the 2004/05 survey) there has been a decline in last year use of any illicit drug among both age groups (16 to 24 and 25 to 59) for both men and women. (Table 3.06)

3.4 EXTENT OF ILLICIT DRUG USE BY LIFESTYLE FACTORS

Illicit drug use varied by lifestyle factors such as frequency of nightclub visits, pub/wine bar visits and alcohol consumption.

It is important to note that demographic factors are not necessarily independently associated with higher drug use. For example, those with higher household incomes may be married and have two main incomes, so analysis that suggests that household income is an important factor, may actually mask the fact that the underlying factor could be marital status. A previously published regression analysis of CSEW demographic characteristics and lifestyle factors found that age, sex, frequency of alcohol consumption and marital status were the most important factors associated with drug use (Hoare and Moon, 2010).

0 2 4 6 8 10

Cannabis Powder cocaine Ecstasy Amphetamines Hallucinogens

Percentage

Men Women

(23)

3. Illicit drug use by personal, household and area characteristics and lifestyle factors

15

As shown in previous years, levels of drug use in the last year increase with the frequency of nightclub visits and pub/wine bar visits (Table 3.01). For example, the 2014/15 CSEW showed among adults aged 16 to 59:

Use of any Class A drug in the 12 months prior to interview was around 10 times higher among those who had visited a nightclub at least four times in the past month (19.2%) compared with those who had not visited a nightclub in the past month (1.8%).

Higher levels of Class A drug use among those who were regular visitors to nightclubs was driven mainly by last year use of powder cocaine and ecstasy. Last year use of powder cocaine was around eight times higher among those who had visited a nightclub at least four times in the past month (12.2%) compared with those who had not visited a nightclub in the past month (1.4%). Last year use of ecstasy was around 25 times higher among those who had visited a nightclub at least four times in the past month (15.7%) compared with those who had not visited a nightclub in the past month (0.6%).

Similarly, powder cocaine use was around 26 times higher among those who had visited a pub or bar at least nine times in the last month (10.4%) than those who had not visited a pub or bar at all in the last month (0.4%). A similar pattern was also seen with ecstasy.

The CSEW also provides information on last year drug use by frequency of alcohol consumption.

Figure 3.3 shows that as frequency of alcohol consumption increased, so did levels of last year drug use. Adults aged 16 to 59 who reported drinking alcohol three or more days per week in the last month were around twice as likely to have used any illicit drug (12.9%) and seven times more likely to have used a Class A drug (5.8%) in the last year than those who reported drinking less than once a month (including non-drinkers) (5.0% for any drug and 0.8% for any Class A drug). Further information on the simultaneous use of illicit drugs and alcohol are available in Chapter 5.

Figure 3.3: Proportion of 16 to 59 year olds reporting use of selected drugs in the last year by frequency of alcohol consumption, 2014/15 CSEW

Source: Home Office: Table 3.01.

3.5 EXTENT OF ILLICIT DRUG USE BY AREA FACTORS

In the 2014/15 CSEW, levels of last year any drug use varied by area characteristics (Table 3.03).

Use of any drug, any Class A drug and any stimulant drug, were higher among those living in urban areas compared with those living in rural areas. For example, 9.1 per cent of people living in urban areas had used any drug in the last year compared with 6.5 per cent of those living in rural areas.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Powder cocaine Ecstasy Cannabis Any class A Any drug

Percentage

Less than once a month (inc. non-drinkers) Less than one day a week in the last month 1-2 days a week in the last month

3 or more days a week in the last month

(24)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

16

There was variation in drug use by Output Area Classification. Those living in areas classified as ‘City living’ were more likely to have used any drug (17.2%) than those living in any other types of areas (e.g. 5.4% of those living in ‘Prospering suburbs’ areas). Patterns of use of any Class A drug were similar, with the highest use among those living in ‘City living’ areas (9.4%) compared with other types (e.g. 1.8% of those living in ‘Prospering suburbs’ areas).

The CSEW also provides information on the proportion of adults aged 16 to 59 who have taken drugs in the last year by the employment domain of the English Indices of Multiple Deprivation.

Use of any drug was highest for those living in the areas defined to be the most deprived (10.2%), and lowest for those living in areas defined to be the least deprived (6.9%). However, use of any Class A drug did not vary with Indices of Deprivation, with similar levels of use in all areas (3.1% in the most deprived areas, 3.3% in middle areas, and 2.9% in the least deprived areas).

3.6 EXTENT OF PRESCRIPTION PAINKILLER MISUSE BY PERSONAL AND HOUSEHOLD FACTORS

The 2014/15 CSEW included a question for the first time on the misuse of prescription-only painkillers7. The extent of misuse of prescription-only painkillers is discussed in Chapter 1. Findings from the 2014/15 CSEW show that the demographic characteristics of those who misuse prescription- only painkillers are noticeably different from those who use illicit drugs in some respects, while in other respects there are similarities

While the misuse of prescription-only painkillers in the last year declined with age, (8.0% of 16 to 19 year olds compared with 3.0% of 55 to 59 year olds), the decline was shallower than the decline with age seen for illicit drugs. Higher levels of prescription-only painkiller misuse were seen in some older age groups; for example 4.5 per cent of 45 to 54 year olds reported having misused prescription-only painkillers in the last year, compared with 3.2 per cent who reported having used illicit drugs (Table 3.13).

The misuse of prescription painkillers did not vary by frequency of alcohol consumption, with similar levels across all categories (4.6% of those who drank alcohol three or more days a week in the last month reported misuse of prescription painkillers, compared with 5.5% of those who drank alcohol less than once a month) (Table 3.13). By contrast, illicit drug use increased with the frequency of alcohol consumption (Figure 3.3).

People with a long-standing illness or disability were more likely to have misused prescription- only painkillers and to have used an illicit drug in the last year. Among those with a long- standing illness, 8.5 per cent had misused prescription-only painkillers in the last year (compared with 4.8% without an illness) and 11.9 per cent had taken an illicit drug in the last year (compared with 8.1% without an illness). Cannabis use was a large contributor to these proportions (9.4% of people with a long-standing illness had used cannabis in the last year, compared with 6.3% of those without).

When compared with illicit drugs, differences were also apparent in certain household factors.

For example, misuse of painkillers was similar in both rural and urban areas (5.4% of those in urban areas reported misuse of prescription painkillers, compared with 5.3% in rural areas) whereas the use of illicit drugs is higher in urban areas (9.1% of those in urban areas reported use of illicit drugs, compared with 6.5% in rural areas). This, alongside similar relationships in other personal and household factors, suggests that the misuse of prescription painkillers is distributed more evenly across the general population than the use of illicit drugs (Table 3.15).

7 The question on painkillers asked respondents whether they had taken prescription-only painkillers not prescribed to them, which they took only for the feeling or experience it gave them.

(25)

17

4. New psychoactive substances (NPS)

INTRODUCTION

This chapter covers the use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) among adults aged 16 to 59. The use of generic, rather than specific, new psychoactive substances has been measured by the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) for the first time. In this context ‘NPS’ refers to newly available drugs that mimic the effect of drugs such as cannabis, ecstasy and powder cocaine, and which may or may not be illegal to buy, but are sometimes referred to as ‘legal highs’.

Questions on the use of individual new psychoactive substances, or other substances not previously measured, have been included in some past surveys. These include salvia, nitrous oxide (‘laughing gas’), BZP (a stimulant similar to amphetamines), synthetic cannabinoids (‘spice’) and GHB/GBL.

Findings on the use of these substances are shown in previous Drug Misuse bulletins.

Where NPS use is discussed in comparison with the use of ‘other illicit drugs’ in this chapter, this phrase refers to those drugs which are discussed in the previous chapters8. Estimates of NPS use among adults from the 2014/15 CSEW can be found in the data tables.

KEY FINDINGS

Use of NPS in the last year appears to be concentrated among young adults aged 16 to 24. Around 1 in 40 (2.8%) young adults aged 16 to 24 took a new psychoactive substance in the last year, while fewer than 1 in 100 (0.9%) of 16 to 59 year olds had done so. This equates to around 174,000 young adults aged 16 to 24 and 279,000 adults aged 16 to 59.

In particular, use of NPS in the last year was concentrated among young men aged 16 to 24. Four per cent of younger men aged 16 to 24 had used an NPS in the last year (around 128,000), accounting for almost half of all last year NPS users. They were also more likely to have used an NPS in the last year than young women aged 16 to 24 (1.5%, or 47,000).

Eighty-four per cent of young adults aged 16 to 24 who had used an NPS, had also used another illicit drug in the last year. This proportion was similar (83.0%) for 16 to 59 year olds.

Young adults aged 16 to 24 who had used another illicit drug in the last year were significantly more likely to have used an NPS in the last year (12.3%) than those who had not (0.6%). This difference is also statistically significant for the wider age group (16 to 59), and for most individual drug types.

People who had visited a pub or a nightclub in the last month were significantly more likely to have used an NPS in the last year than those who had not. Among young adults aged 16 to 24, 3.6 per cent of those who had visited a pub and 4.9 per cent of those who had visited a nightclub in the last month had used an NPS in the last year, compared with 1.5 per cent and 1.6 per cent of those who had not, respectively. The same patterns are seen in the wider age group of 16 to 59 year olds, as NPS use is concentrated among 16 to 24 year olds.

People who had consumed alcohol once or more in the last month were significantly more likely to have used an NPS in the last year, in both age groups. Among young adults aged 16 to 24, 4.0 per cent of those who had drunk alcohol in the last month had used an NPS, compared with 0.8 per cent of those who had not. Among all adults aged 16 to 59, the proportions were 1.1 per cent and 0.4 per cent, respectively.

8 The drugs covered by the term ‘other illicit drugs’ are those included in the “any drug” measure in previous chapters. These are Amphetamines, Amyl nitrite, Anabolic steroids, Cannabis, Powder cocaine, Crack cocaine, Ecstasy, Heroin, Ketamine, LSD, Magic mushrooms, Mephedrone, Methadone, Methamphetamine, Tranquillisers, “unknown pills or powders”, “something unknown smoked”, or “any other drug”. The self-completion module of CSEW on drug use asks about each of these drug types separately from NPS. It is possible that respondents who said they had taken “unknown pills or powders”, “something unknown smoked”, or “any other drug” had included their NPS use in their responses prior to answering the questions on NPS use.

However, including or excluding these drug types in the overall measure of illicit drug use does not make a statistical difference to the comparison of NPS use with other illicit drug use.

(26)

Drug Misuse: Findings from the 2014/15 Crime Survey for England and Wales

18

4.1 EXTENT OF NPS USE

Overall, the prevalence of NPS use among adults aged 16 to 59, whether in the last year or in their lifetime, is generally low, compared with the prevalence of well established drugs such as cannabis, powder cocaine and ecstasy (see Chapter 1). When asked whether they had ever used an NPS, 4.79 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 said that they had never heard of NPS, or ‘legal highs’, even after an explanation of what they were.

The 2014/15 CSEW estimated that 0.9 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 had used an NPS in the last year. This equates to 279,000 people. Younger adults were more likely to have used an NPS, with 2.8 per cent of 16 to 24 year olds (174,000 people) having used an NPS in the last year. The younger age group accounts for almost two-thirds of all last-year users of NPS.

Men (1.3%) were significantly more likely to have used an NPS than women (0.4%) – 214,000 men, compared with 66,000 women. In particular, young men aged 16 to 24 were around four times more likely (4.0%) to have used an NPS than all adults aged 16 to 59 (0.9%). Young men were also significantly more likely than young women (1.5%) to have used an NPS in the last year. Around 128,000 young men aged 16 to 24 had taken an NPS in the last year, compared with 47,000 young women.

Figure 4.1: Prevalence of NPS use ever and in the last year, by sex, 16 to 59 and 16 to 24 year olds, 2014/15 CSEW

Source: Home Office Table 4.01.

Overall, 2.9 per cent of adults aged 16 to 59 had used an NPS in their lifetime (937,000 people).

Compared with those who had used an NPS in the last year, similar relationships with age and sex can be seen among those who had used an NPS in their lifetime; men were around twice as likely (3.9%) as women (1.9%) to have used an NPS, and young adults aged 16 to 24 were around twice as likely (6.1%) to have used an NPS as those in the wider 16 to 59 age group (2.9%). Among those who had used an NPS in their lifetime, younger men (8.0%) and younger women (4.2%) were both more likely to have used an NPS than all adults aged 16 to 59. This is likely to be due to the fact that these substances are relatively new, and the picture of use of these substances ever will change as time goes on and the population ages. (Table 4.01)

9 Figure not shown in tables. For the analysis of NPS use, those who said they had never heard of new psychoactive substances or ‘legal highs’ were assumed not to have taken them.

0 2 4 6 8

Use in the last year Use ever

Percentage

All adults 16-59 Males 16-59 Females 16-59

Use in the last year Use ever All adults 16-24

Males 16-24 Females 16-24

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Validation visits are essential to optimise data quality at source, ensure centres are aware of the importance of correct informed consent and encourage dialogue to

[r]

Aims The two main symptoms referred by chronic heart failure (HF) patients as the causes of exercise termination during maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) are

Indeed, the group Cycling other–that is, former agonist road cyclists still involved in cycling, either in a different specialty (e.g., mountain bike) or with a different role

Many of the business areas where commercial criminal justice in England and Wales now flourishes are based upon original developments in the United States

While literary writing is an art based on principles of personal style, fiction, and originality, good scientific writing is a craft that builds on clear communication

11 The survey aims to include every individual living in E&W with diagnosed HIV infection who has attended for HIV treatment or care at NHS services during Abbreviations:

Netolitzki, Schnarf's close friend, prepared in the '30 his handbook on the angiosperm seed anatomy, which was also published in the large Linsbauer handbook