Fattori predittivi di risposta alla Immunoterapia
Claudio Doglioni
University Vita-Salute San Raffaele IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital
Milan
PD-1/PD-L1
• Immuno-oncology scenario
– Tumor Immune Micro-Environment TIME
• PD1-PD-L1 immune-checkpoint and determinants of Immune Checkpoints Inhibitors–ICI- response
- Mechanisms of PD-L1 expression and control
- Interplay between immune response and genomic landscape in cancer
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors A new paradigm in
Cancer
Immunotherapy
Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T cells
CAR-T
Chen & Mellman Nature 2017
Octopus: T cells
Blue water: cold tumors
Red water: hot tumors
Yellow sea anemones:
MDSC
Crabs: tumor cells
Immune poor Immune rich
CD20 CD3 CD163
Binnewies et al Nat Med 2018
CRC: Consensus Molecular Subtypes 1-4
Immunity 2018 48, 812-830.e14DOI: (10.1016/j.immuni.2018.03.023) Copyright © 2018 The AuthorsTerms and Conditions
Immune landscape of Cancer
• C1 Wound healing
angiogenesis, proliferation, Th2 bias• C2 IFN-gamma dominant
CD8, M1-M2 polarization• C3 Inflammatory
elevated Th17 and Th1• C4 Lymphocyte depleted
macrophage signature• C5 Immunologically quiet
M2 macrophages• C6 TGF-beta dominant
TGF-beta signatureNature 2018
Timing of clinical development of anti–CTLA-4, anti–PD-1, and anti–PD-L1 antibodies, from first administration to humans to FDA approval.
Antoni Ribas, and Jedd D. Wolchok Science 2018;359:1350-1355
Published by AAAS
PD-L1 Expression in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancers.
Garon EB et al. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2018-2028
22C3 Mab
TPS >50%
Inhibitory signals in Serous Ovarian Ca
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
LAG3 TIM3
PD1
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
PD-L1
TIM3 +++ TIM3 +
LAG3 +++
LAG3 +++ PD1 +++
MM: PD-L1,LAG3, VISTA,TIM3
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
LAG3
VISTA TIM3
0 0,5 1 1,5 2 2,5 3 3,5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
PD-L1
LAG3 MM
TIM3 MM
PD-L1 MM
VISTA MM
Cellsignal 2018
PD1(CD279)/PD-L1 (CD274) axis
• PD-1 is a negative costimulatory receptor
expressed by T cells, NK cells and some B cells.
• It is involved in the later stages of the immune response, regulating the activation of T cells in peripheral tissues.
• PD-1 has two ligands, PD-L1 (also known as B7- H1 or CD274) and PD-L2 (B7-DC or CD273).
• These ligands are expressed on a wide range of immune effector cells, antigen-presenting cells, and Tumor Cells.
PD1(CD279)/PD-L1 (CD274) axis
• The binding of PD-1 to one of its ligands, PD- L1 or PD-L2, can inhibit a cytotoxic T-cell
response.
• Tumors can coopt this pathway to escape T-cell–
induced antitumor activity.
• PD-L1 expression may also be induced by
interferon gamma, which is produced by T-
helper 1 cells as part of a host inflammatory
response
Mechanism regulating
PD-L1 expression
ICI in PD1-PD-L1 axis
▪ Patients respond to anti–PD-1 or anti–PD-L1 therapy because of a preexisting antitumor T cell response.
▪ The infiltrating T cells engage their TCR through recognition of a tumor antigen
▪ triggering expression of PD-1 on T cells
▪ release of IFN-gamma
▪ reactive expression of PD-L1 by cancer- cells
▪ Tumor cells disarm specific T cells through PD-L1 expression:
adaptive immune resistance / noli me tangere
▪ It is reversible by blocking the PD-1–PD-L1 interaction
Mechanism of action of PD-1–blockade therapy.
Antoni Ribas, and Jedd D. Wolchok Science 2018;359:1350-1355
Published by AAAS
Ivashkiv L. Nature Review Immunology 2018
Interferon and Cancer Immunotherapy
ICB: Immune Checkpoint Blockade
Cancer Cell 2016
CMTM6 a transmembrane protein maintains the expression of PD-L1 and regulates anti-tumour immunity.
Tonsil DAPI
PD-L1
CMTM6 merge
NSCLC ADCA CMTM6
NSCLC SQCC PD-L1
NSCLC SQCC CMTM6
❖Colorectal tumors downregulate interferon receptor IFNAR1
❖ Loss of IFNAR1 promotes generation of immune privileged niche
❖ IFNAR1 regulates viability of cytotoxic lymphocytes and efficacy of immunotherapies
IFNAR1+ IFNAR1-
PD-L1 IHC as marker of ICI response
• The predictive utility of PD-L1 IHC for
response to ICIs have yielded mixed results
• Response to treatment does not strictly
correlate with PD- L1 tumor expression in all
patients
The equivocal utility of PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker
• Why:
1. Heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression within the tumor microenvironment,
2. Different performance characteristics of IHC assay methods and reagents,
3. Lack of definition of critical cutoffs for PD-L1 staining associated with clinical outcomes,
4. Limited number of binding sites on the hydrophobic PD-L1 molecule
5. Denaturing effects of formalin fixation 6. Glicosylation of PD-L1
How to predict response to ICB?
• PD-L1 expression by IHC
• TMB
• Interferon
• T lymphocyte status
• Exosomal PD-L1
Science 2015
Higher mutation burden in tumors, higher neoantigen burden, and DNA repair pathway mutations was associated with improved objective response, durable clinical benefit, and progression-free survival.
Genomic correlates of response to immune checkpoint therapies in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
by Diana Miao, Claire A. Margolis, Wenhua Gao, Martin H. Voss, Wei Li, Dylan J.
Martini, Craig Norton, Dominick Bossé, Stephanie M. Wankowicz, Dana Cullen, Christine Horak, Megan Wind-Rotolo, Adam Tracy, Marios Giannakis, Frank Stephen Hodi, Charles G. Drake, Mark W. Ball, Mohamad E. Allaf, Alexandra Snyder, Matthew
D. Hellmann, Thai Ho, Robert J. Motzer, Sabina Signoretti, William G. Kaelin, Toni K.
Choueiri, and Eliezer M. Van Allen
Science
Volume 359(6377):801-806 February 16, 2018
Published by AAAS
PBRM1 LOF mutations correlate with clinical benefit in a validation cohort of ccRCC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Diana Miao et al. Science 2018;359:801-806
Published by AAAS
Nature Med May 2018
Science 2018
18-gene T cell–inflamed GEP that predicted response to pembrolizumab across multiple solid tumors.
❖The IFNγ+ mRNA signature (IFNγ+ , CD274, LAG3, CXCL9) may assist in identifying patients with improved outcomes with durvalumab, independent of PD-L1 assessed by IHC.
❖The baseline signature was associated with TMB but not survival
Dormant TIL: high CD3+/low GZB/low Ki-67 associated with:
•survival benefit to immune checkpoint blockers
•independent from the tumor mutational load and PD-L1 expression.
Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) Gene signature to model the tumor immune escape
as a reliable surrogate biomarker to predict ICB response.
The web application at http://tide.dfci.harvard.edu.
Tumor specific CD8 are CD39+
Bystander CD8 are CD39-
Nature 2018
Nature 2018
Exosomal PD-L1
Circulating exosomal PD-L1 may reflect distinct states of anti-tumour immunity.
• Prior to pembrolizumab treatment
– PD-L1 level may correlate with a role of exosomal PD-L1 in immune dysfunction
– High levels of exosomal PD-L1 may reflect the ‘exhaustion’ of T cells to a stage at which they can no longer be reinvigorated by anti-PD-1 treatment.
• In on-treatment patients,
– an increase in the level of exosomal PD-L1, following and correlating positively with T cell reinvigoration, would reflect the presence of a successful anti-tumour immunity elicited by the anti-PD-1 therapy
Determinants of response to Immune-checkpoint inhibitors
MMR/MSI INF gamma
Nature Medicine 2018
Cancer Cell 2018
Predicting response to ICIs
➢A single biomarker is not sufficient to select patients.
➢A combination of studies are necessary in baseline tumor biopsies
➢DNA analyses for tumor mutational load and
absence of deleterious mutations in key immune signaling pathways
➢RNA analyses to detect the presence or absence of IFN- signaling and a favorable tumor phenotype
➢PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and CD8+T cells expressing PD-1 in the TME
Precision guesswork
Pathologist
Someone who does precision guesswork based on unreliable data
provided by those
of questionable knowledge
See also Magician, Wizard