Who’s Who in Orthopedics
It was bold surgery for those years. The operation was highly successful and resulted in his being invited in 1909 to give a report of the case before a meeting of the American Orthopedic Associa- tion. Later that same year he was asked to talk on the operative fusion of the hip joint before the International Association of Medicine and Surgery in Budapest—quite an honour for a young man only 6 years out of medical school.
Undoubtedly, this trip abroad so early in his career was the means of expanding his horizons.
Later he became one of the great international surgeons of his day, among his honors being the presidency of the International College of Sur- geons in 1943.
He was a short, stocky, heavy-set person, similar in build to John Hunter, with somewhat the same fiery, dynamic personality. He was aggressive, individualistic, ambitious, impetuous and impulsive, always wanting to get things done right away. Some of his friends said that he was a law unto himself. He had tremendous physical stamina and ability, and performed hours of work far in excess of the average man. The day was never long enough for him. This ability was prob- ably the no. 1 key to his success. Success usually was his in anything that he set out to do. Some called it “Albee luck,” but long hours of hard work, determined energy and bulldog tenacity were more often the reasons. He had tremendous courage in tackling new ideas, especially in surgery, and always concentrated greatly on what he was doing.
In no sense could he be called a modest, humble man; as Mrs. Albee said, “He had no sweet humility.” He was not shy, although it was said that, when he first started in medicine, he was timid and shy, particularly in talking. This is hard to believe when during most of his life, as one of his close friends wrote, “he was always preach- ing Albee and bone-graft surgery” and was “an automatic propagandist.” Throughout his life he maintained his youthful enthusiasm. As Mrs.
Albee has said, “He was a great man–little boy combination.” Perhaps this youthful enthusiasm might be called the no. 2 key to his success.
With his friends he was always frank, cordial, kind and sincere, and usually extremely consid- erate of the feelings of others, but this was not always so; he had very few close friends among his contemporaries in orthopedic surgery. He did not have what some would call a superior mind.
He was not a brilliant speaker; he had a charac- teristic colloquial style. In all his travels abroad—
4