• Non ci sono risultati.

BIBLIOGRAFIA 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "BIBLIOGRAFIA 1"

Copied!
5
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

1

BIBLIOGRAFIA

1. Fitzgerald R., Kaufer H., Malkani A. L. Ortopedia e Traumatologia, volume 2, pag. 933, 2004, Verduci Editore.

2. Fitzgerald R., Kaufer H., Malkani A. L. Ortopedia e Traumatologia, volume 1, pag. 89, 2004, Verduci Editore.

3. Charnley J.: Low Friction Arthroplasty: Theory and Practice. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1979.

4. Kroger H, Kotaniemi A, Kroger L, Alhava E. Development of bone mass and bone density of the spine and femoral neck - a prospective study of 65 children and adolescents. Bone Miner 1993; 23:171-182.

5. Santavirta S, Konttinen YT, Bergroth V, Eskola A, Tallroth K, Lindholm TS. Aggressive granulomatous lesions associated with arthroplasty. Immunopathological studies. J Bone Joint Surg (A) 1990; 2:252-258.

6. Huiskes R. The various stress patterns of pressfitt ingrown and cemented femoral stems. Clin Orthop Res 1990; 261:27-38.

7. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller EJ, Brooks CE. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical obsevations of noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992; 274:79-96.

8. Sychterz CJ, Engh CA. The influence of clinical factors on periprosthetic bone remodelling. Clin Orthop Res 1996; 322:285-292.

9. Engh CA, MCGovem TF, Bobyn JD, Harris WH. A quantitative evaluation of periprosthetic bone remodelling after cementless total hip arthroplasty. J bone Joint Surg (A) 1992; 7:1009-1020. 10. Kilgus DJ, Shimaoka EE, Tipton JS, Eberle RW. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

measurement of bone mineral density around porous coated cmentless femoral implants. J Bone Joint Surg (B) 1993; 2:279-287.

11. Kiratli BJ, Heiner JP, McBeath AA, Wilson MA. Determination of bone mineral densitometry by dual-energy x ray absorptiometry in patients with uncemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1992; 10:836-844.

12. Mazess R, Collick B, Trempe J, Barden H, Hanson J. Performance of a dual-energy x-ray bone densitometer. Calcif Tissue Int 1989; 44:228-232.

13. Cattaneo L. Ossa, articolazioni e muscoli dell’uomo Bologna: Monduzzi; 1985. 14. Balboni GC. Anatomia umana. Milano: Edi-Ermes; 2000.

15. Felson DT. Osteoartrosi. In: Harrison TR, Fauci AS, edi09. p. 2086-93.

16. Rosemberg AE. Ossa, articolazioni etors. Harrison Principi di medicina interna. 17a ed. Milano: McGraw-Hill; 20 tumori delle parti molli. In: Robbins SL, Cotran RS, editors. Robbins e Cotran Le basi patologiche delle malattie. 7.a ed. Milano: Elsevier Masson; 2008. p. 1273-324.

(2)

2

17. Guido G. Malattie degenerative e reumatiche articolari. In: Guido G, editor. Manuale di ortopedia. Roma: Marrapese; 2009. p. 83-126.

18. Doria A, Fiocco U, Gambari PF. Artrite reumatoide. In: Todesco S, Gambari PF, Punzi L, editors. Malattie reumatiche. 4a ed. Milano: McGrawHill; 2007. p. 137-70.

19. Harkess JW. Arthroplasty of hip. Canale ST. eds. Campbell's Operative Orthopedics. St. Luis, MI, USA; Mosby; 1998 381:424.

20. Charnley J. Total hip replacement by low friction arthroplasty. Clin Or- thop 1970;72:7 21. PNLG-Revisione sistematica sulle protesi d’anca: affidabilità dell’impianto Programma

nazionale per le linee guida Ministero della Salute-Pubblicazione Settembre 2004, Aggiornato Settembre 2007.

22. Ministero del Lavoro, della Salute e delle Politiche Sociali: Relazione sullo Stato Sanitario del Paese 2007-2008. 2009.

23. Siopack JS, Jergesen HE. Total Hip Arthroplasty. Western Journal of Medicine, 1995. 24. Wolff, J. The law of bone remodelling. Berlin Heidelberg New York, Springer; 1986

25. A. Surace, G. Mineo, AM. Previtera, G. Tandoi. Indicazioni, selezione e geometria impiantistica protesica nel trattamento delle fratture cervicali di femore. Gior Ita di Ortop e Traumatologia 1990; vol16 - fascicolo3.

26. L’artropastica di rivestimento dell'anca con accoppiamento metallo metallo: risultati clinici, radiologici e tribologici. Dip di ricerca traslazionale e delle nuove tecnologie in medicina e chirurgia, 2013, N. Bianchi. Etd.

27. F.Falez et al. Role of cement fixation in early failures of resurfacing hip replacement. GIOT 2008

28. Kevin L. Ong, J. Day, MT. Kurtz. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Proximally Coated Femoral Stems. Effects of Stem Length and Surface Finish. The Journal of Arthroplasty, vol 24, issue 5, pag 819-824; 2009.

29. Weinams H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Effects of fit and bonding characteristics of femoral stems on adaptive bone remodeling. J Bio- mech Eng 1994;116(4): 393-400.

30. Weinans H, Huiskes R, Grootenboer HJ. Quantitative analysis of bone reactions to relative motions at implant-bone interfaces. J Biomech 1993;26(11):1271-1281.

31. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):5009.

32. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M. A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):952-8.

33. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007 Oct 27;370(9597):1508-19.

34. Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980 Jul Aug(150):263-70.

35.Giovanni Iolasco (ricercatore del Dipartimento di Chirurgia Ortopedica, Traumatologia e Riabilitazione, II Università di Napoli). Bisfosfonati e protesi articolari.

(3)

3

36. U.Andreus; M.Collaca. Analisi dello sforzo meccanico all'interfaccia osso corticale-stelo protesico nella protesi di anca mediante il metodo degli elementi finiti. Giot. 2006;32:198:204. 37. Huo MH, Waldman BJ. Protesi totale d'anca cementata. In: Craig EV, editor. Ortopedia clinica.

Roma: Antonio Delfino; 2006. p. 522-34.

38. Franchin F, Nicola UD. La protesi d'anca di primo impianto: Springer; 2003.

39. Basso S. La pianificazione preoperatoria nella chirurgia d’anca nei primi impianti. In: La tecnica mini-invasiva anteriore nella chirurgia protesica dell’anca. Candiotto S, Timeo Editore; 2016. p.55-64.

40. Siopack JS, Jergesen HE. Total hip arthroplasty. West J Med. 1995 Mar;162(3):243-9. 41. Buly RL, Nestor BJ. Revisione dell'impianto di protesi totale di anca. In: Craig EV, editor.

Ortopedia clinica. Roma: Antonio Delfino; 2006. p. 562-87.

42. Younger AS, Masri B, Duncan C. Revisione di protesi totale d'anca infetta. In: Craig EV, editor. Ortopedia clinica. Roma: Antonio Delfino; 2006. p. 549-61.

43. Charnley J. Postoperative infection after total hip replacement with special reference to air contamination in the operating room. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 Sep;87:167-87.

44. Salvati EA, Chekofsky KM, Brause BD, Wilson PD, Jr. Reimplantation in infection: a 12-year experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Oct(170):62-75.

45. Tsukayama DT, Estrada R, Gustilo RB. Infection after total hip arthroplasty. A study of the treatment of one hundred and six infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Apr;78(4):512-23. 46. Andreaus U, Colloca M. Analisi dello sforzo meccanico all'interfaccia osso corticale-stelo

proteico nella protesi d'anca mediante il metodo degli elementi finiti. GIOT. 2006;32:198-204. 47. Lindsay R, Fey C, Haboubi (1987) A dual photon absorptiometric measuraments of bone mineraldensity increasewith sorce life. Calcif Tissue Int 41:293-294. 48. Albanese CV, Santori FS, Pavan Let al (2008) Periprosthetic DXA after total hip arthroplasty with short vs ultrashort custom made femoral stems.37 patients followed for 3 years. Acta Orthop (in press).

49. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a seriesof 140 consecutive hipswith a minimum five yearfollow up. A clinical, radiological, and histological analysis. Giannini S, Cadossi M, Chiarello E, Faldini C, Moroni A, Romagnoli M. Orthopaetic and Trauma Clinic II, Unversity of Bologna, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, Bologna – Italy. Hip Int 2011 Jan 27. pii: FD389263-CE17 4642-A3DA1AD5AFD7E963. [Epub ahead of print].

50. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Jun;51(4):737-55.

51. Bobyn JD, Mortimer ES, Glassman AH, Engh CA, Miller EJ, Brooks CE. Producing and avoiding stress shielding: Laboratory and clinical observations of non cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1992; 274:79-96.

52. MIZ. Ridzwan, S. Shuib, AY Hassan et al. Problem of stress shielding and improvement to the hip implant design: A review. J. Med. Sci, 7(3): 460-467. April 2007

53. Sychterz CJ et al. Effect of femoral stiffness on bone remodeling after uncemented arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001, 389:218-227

(4)

4

54. Silva MJ et al. Reduced bone stress as predicted by composite beam correlates with cortical bone loss following cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 1999, 17:525-531. 55. Wooley, Paul H., et al. Cellular immune responses to orthopaedic implant materials following

cemented total joint replacement. Journal of orthopaedic research 15.6 (1997): 874-880. 56. Mulroy WF et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second generation

cementing tecniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1996, 78:325-330.

57. Rae T. A study on the effect of particulate metals of orthopaedic interest on murine macrophage in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1975;57:444-450.

58. Pazzaglia UE, dell’Orbo C, Wilkinson MJ. The Foreign Body Reaction in Total Hip Arthroplasties. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1987;106:209-219

59. Pazzaglia UE, Pringle JAS. Bone resorption in vitro: macrophages and giant cells from failed total hip replacement versus osteoclasts. Biomaterials 1989;10

60. Maguire Jr JK et al. Foreign body reaction to polymeric debris following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1987, 216:213-223.

61. Perry MJ et al. Analysis of cell types and mediator production from tissues around loosening joint implants. Br J Rheumatol 1995, 34 :1127-1134

62. Eftekhar NS et al. Prosthetic synovitis. Hip 1985:169-183

63. Lassus J et al. Macrophage activation results in bone resorption. Clin Orthop 1998, 352:7-15 64. Xu JW et al. Production of platelet-derived growth factor in aseptic loosening of total hip

replacement. Rheumatol Int 1998, 17:215-221

65. Denis Clohisy. Cellular Mechanisms of Osteolysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003 Jan;85(suppl 1):S4-S6

66. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):500- 9.

67. C. Faldini et al.Il ruolo dei rivestimenti di superficie in idrossiapatite in ortopedia e traumatologia. Archivio di ortopedia e reumatologia, Dec 2012, Volume 123, Issue 3, pp 3-4.

68. Consoli V, Montano A, Alfieri P et al. Studio morfologico strumentale della cavità cotiloidea e della metaepifisi prossimale del femore. GIOT 1996; 22(suppl.1): 139-50.

69. Williams, A., Bax, N. J., and Kloser, R. J. 2009. Remarks on “Comment on: Williams et al . (2009) Australia's deep-water reserve network: implications of false homogeneity for classify ing abiotic surrogates of biodiversity, ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 214–224” by Peter T. Harris, Andrew D. Heap, Tara J. Anderson, and Brendan Brooke. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 2086–2088.

70. Wohlrab D, Hagel A, Hein W. Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation. Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2004;142:685-90.

71. Albanese CV et al. Bone remodelling in THA: A comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report. Hip Int 2006, 16(suppl 3):S9-1.

(5)

5

72. W. Brodner, P. Bitzan, F. Lomoschitz, P. Krepler, R. Jankovsky, S. Lehr, F. Kainberger, F. Gottsauner-Wolf. Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after cementless total hip arthroplasty. A five-year logiudinal studiy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004;86-B:20-6.

73. Q. Zhang MD, S. B. Goodman MD, PhD, W. J. Maloney MD, J. I. Huddleston III MD. Can a Conical Implant Successfully Address Complex Anatomy in Primary THA? Radiographs and Hip Scores at Early Followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2016) 474:459–464

74. M.C.Parry, M.H.Vioreanu, D.S.Garbuz, B.A.Masri, C.P.Duncan. The Wagner Cone Stem for the Management of the Challenging Femur in Primary Hip Arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty http://dx.doi.org/10.10106/j.arth.2016.02.007.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Figure 7 shows a 3D mesh model of the knee joint generated (by means of the Marching Cubes [8] algorithm) from a CT dataset in which the cortical bone has been classified using

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore a.a. Il numero che segue la sigla, con indicazione di recto e verso, indica il foglio del codice. Il numero che segue la sigla segna il numero

It has recently been reported that RANKL expression on lymphocytes and marrow stromal cells is significantly elevated during estrogen deficiency in humans and corre- lates directly

I primi tentativi di esplorare i formalismi e le tecnologie connessi al web semantico – ed in particolar modo le ontologie ed i linked open data – sono in parte riconducibili a due

In another prospective randomized study of 80 pa- tients, use of a continuous passive motion device at home was compared with professional home physical therapy visits after total

Influence of Femoral Cement Filling Technique In the early years of hip replacement, cement was intro- duced in an antegrade fashion from the proximal end into the femoral

• Metals evaluation on a large sample population, with special attention to creams detergents and oils, considering REACH regulation and ISS advice. • Cosmetics have a variety

(A) Tumor clusters obtained by spectral clustering (for k = 2 to 8 groups) on the SNF network fused data obtained from both gene expression and DNA methylation data on 763