• Non ci sono risultati.

Osteosarcoma 13

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Osteosarcoma 13"

Copied!
6
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Osteosarcoma

Thomas Kühne

Definition – 160 Epidemiology – 160 Location – 160

Etiology and Tumor Genetics – 160 Pathology – 161

Clinical Manifestations – 162 Metastasis – 162

Evaluation – 162 Radiology – 163

Differential Diagnosis – 163 Treatment – 163

Treatment for Relapsed Disease – 164 Prognosis – 164

Complications – 164

(2)

Definition

 Primary malignant tumor of bone

 Origin: primitive mesenchymal stem cell capable of differentiating toward bone (but also fibrous tissue and cartilage)

 Osteoid tissue or immature bone production of malignant proliferating mesenchy- mal tumor cells

 Represents a heterogeneous group of tumors (Table 13.1.)

Epidemiology

 The sixth most common group of malignant tumors in children

 Adolescents and young adults: the third most common malignant tumor

 The most common bone tumor in children and adolescents (approximately 35% of primary sarcomas of bone)

 Rare in the first decade of life (less than 5%)

 Approximately 60% of patients are between 10 and 20 years old

 Occurs most frequently during the adolescent growth spurt

 Bimodal age distribution: the first peak during second decade of life and a small peak (controversial) in patients older than 50 years

 Male-to-female ratio is 1.3–1.6:1

 Peak incidence in second decade of life is somewhat higher in white males than in males of other races

Location

 Skeletal regions affected by greatest growth rate, i.e. distal femoral and proximal tibial metaphyses

 Approximately 50% of osteosarcoma in knee region

 Humerus is third most frequently involved bone, usually proximal humeral meta- physis and diaphysis

 Pelvis, i.e. ilium in approximately 10%

Etiology and Tumor Genetics

 Etiology is unknown

 Relation between rapid bone growth as in adolescence and development of osteosa- rcoma

 Ionizing radiation

 Viral cause not proven

 Alkylating agents and anthracyclines may be etiologically involved in secondary osteosarcoma

 Association with Paget’s disease

 Familial osteosarcoma has been reported

160 Chapter 13 - Osteosarcoma

(3)

 Osteosarcoma following hereditary retinoblastoma or associated with mutations in the retinoblastoma (RB) gene without manifestation of a retinoblastoma are well described. However normal RB alleles are found in most investigated osteosarco-

 masFurther evidence of genetic background of osteosarcoma is reflected by TP53 muta- tions (TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene)

Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a familial cancer syndrome, associated with a germline TP53 mutation is strongly associated with osteosarcoma

Pathology

 Morphological classification (e.g. osteoblastic, chondroblastic, fibroblastic)

 Classification according to growth pattern (e.g. intramedullary osteosarcoma (ori- gin and growth primarily within bone tissue) and surface osteosarcoma (growth at surface of bone with periosteal or parosteal tissue)

 There are various classification systems without standardization

 Classification is mainly descriptive; there is often a variability of several tissue types, i.e. production of osteoid, anaplastic stroma cells, different amount of bone tissue, small and large round cells, giant cells, normal osteoclasts. There is no clear pheno- typic association with the morphological subtypes

 Approximately 50% of bone tumors are malignant

 Telangiectatic osteosarcoma

– Rare type osteosarcoma that appears to be a separate entity although similar to conventional osteosarcoma in clinical aspects

Table 13.1. Morphological classification of osteosarcoma

Conventional osteosarcoma Secondary osteosarcoma (retinoblastoma, Paget’s disease,

Osteoblastic irradiation induced, fibrous dysplasia

and others)

Chondroblastic

Fibroblastic Surface osteosarcoma

Small cellparosteal (juxtacortical)

Giant cellperiosteal

Epithelioid

Telangiectatic osteosarcoma

Well differentiated ostiosarcoma Multifocal osteosarcoma

(4)

– The previously reported poor prognosis being much worse than conventional osteosarcoma has improved and now is no different from conventional

– Management as conventional osteosarcoma

 Small-cell osteosarcoma

– May be confused with Ewing sarcoma, but distinguishable by osteoid produc- tion

– Biopsy: adequate tumor sample is required for diagnosis – Management as for conventional osteosarcoma

Clinical Manifestations

 The most frequent symptom is pain originating from the involved region often for weeks or even months

 Sometimes swelling with local signs of inflammation

 Loss of function

 Weight loss is unusual and points to metastatic disease if present

Metastasis

 At time of diagnosis macrometastases are present in approximately 15–20% of pa- tients, but micrometastases (mainly lungs) much more frequently present

 Lung metastases predominate

 Rarely skeletal metastases with or without simultaneous lung metastases

 Multiple bone metastases may also reflect multifocal osteosarcoma with a poor prog- nosis

Evaluation

 Clinical work-up: history, physical examination (pain, location, swelling, signs of inflammation, function)

 Radiology: plain radiographs in two planes, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of primary site of at least complete involved bone plus adjacent joints (tumor extent in bone and soft tissues); MRI is more appropriate than computed tomography (CT)

 scanMetastases: chest X-ray, CT scan of thorax, skeletal radionuclide scan with MRI of hot spots

 Assessment of organ functions

 Open biopsy of tumor before chemotherapy (preferably performed by the same or- thopedic team involved in future surgery of the patient; close collaboration with pathology and pediatric oncology is the basis for successful management)

162 Chapter 13 - Osteosarcoma

(5)

Radiology

 High variability

 Radiological classification of lytic and sclerotic tumors; both components often present

 Tumor matrix may be mineralized resulting in variable dense opacities of different sizes and shapes

 Tumor margins may be poorly defined. Destructive growth pattern with lytic and sclerotic areas and normal bone tissue commonly observed

 Cortex exhibits frequently destructive growth; the tumor is rarely limited to medul- lary space

 Extension into soft tissue common

 Periosteal reaction often present with various features, occasionally as radiating stria- tions called “sunburst signs,” or as open triangles overlying the diaphyseal side of the lesion (Codman’s triangle) or in the form of multiple layers (“onion skin”)

Differential diagnosis

 May be confused with benign and malignant bone lesions

 Callus formation following fracture

 Osteogenesis imperfecta (type I)

 Acute and chronic osteomyelitis

 Osteoblastoma

 Aneurysmal bone cyst

 Benign and aggressive osteoblastoma

 Chondrosarcoma

 Malignant fibrous histiocytoma

 Giant-cell tumor

 Metastatic carcinoma (extremely rare in childhood)

Treatment

 Management ideally done using national or international clinical trials

 Combined modality treatment essential

 Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with standardized evaluation of chemotherapy response of the tumor at the time of definitive surgery followed by risk stratification and postsurgical risk-adapted therapy

 Surgery: goal is a wide resection. Limb-saving surgery with allograft or prosthesis.

In situations of unclear surgical resection (questionable wide resection) and in poor chemotherapy responders consideration of amputation

 Adjuvant postsurgical chemotherapy according to tumor response to chemotherapy and according to a standardized risk stratification

 High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation has not been proven to be of value

 Osteosarcoma is relatively radioresistant

(6)

Treatment of relapsed disease

 Prognosis is poor; 5-year post-relapse survival seems to be less than 30%; patients are often heavily pretreated

 Complete surgery seems to be the most important prognostic factor

 Therapy is not standardized

Prognosis

 Results from the German Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) – Five-year overall survival is approximately 65%

– Five-year overall survival in patients without metastasis at the diagnosis of os- teosarcoma is approximately 70%

– Five-year overall survival in patients with metastasis at the diagnosis of osteosa- rcoma is approximately 30%. Favorable prognostic factors: single metastasis, com- plete surgical resection of tumor

– Patients who respond well to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a significantly better prognosis than poor responders

– Other important prognostic factors:

Location of primary tumor (osteosarcoma of extremities has a better prognosis than other locations), tumor size, surgical result (patients with incomplete re- section have a worse prognosis)

Complications

 According to location of the lesion

 Secondary malignancy

 Psychological complications (related to diagnosis, location, therapy, body image and functional limitations)

 Social problems (costs, school, professional guidance, social contacts, insurability)

164 Chapter 13 - Osteosarcoma

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

To assess the gene expression landscape of tumor infiltrating CD4 + T cells, we isolated different CD4 + lymphocytes subsets from two different tumors, NSCLC and CRC, from the

The effect of treatment on gluten aggregation properties of bran-enriched flour was measured 61.. using the GlutoPeak (Brabender GmbH and Co KG, Duisburg,

By means of this characterization, we ascertained that the experimental Raman intensity acquired with the SERS substrate was actually localized only at the cell surface since

Measurements of boundary layer heat and moisture fluxes, carbon fluxes, high resolution (in a spectral, spatial, and temporal sense) thermal radiation and other

Alla fine di ogni sezione di proposte didattiche per ciascuna annualità verrà proposta una pagina in cui si cercherà di rappresentare il contributo che le diverse attività

This heuristic is admissible, thus pre- serving the optimality properties of the planning algorithm, and it depends only on the database of motion primitives, being applicable

To investigate the in vitro effect of a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) on the efficacy of antibacterial agent (Ga) in the treatment of coated orthopaedic implants infection,