• Non ci sono risultati.

Rett Syndrome

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Rett Syndrome"

Copied!
5
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Rett syndrome, a neurodevelopmental disorder affecting girls almost exclusively, was first described by Rett in 1966.

The disorder now bears his name and became widely known after a report of 35 cases by Hagberg et al. in 1983. The preva- lence is estimated to be 1/10,000 ~ 1/15,000 female births; over 95% of cases arise de novo due to the fact that most females with Rett syndrome do not reproduce. Rett syndrome is consid- ered to be one of the most common genetic causes of mental retardation in girls, second only to Down syndrome.

GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS

1. Inheritance

a. Sporadic cases (99.5%), occurring almost exclusively in females

i. A de novo mutation in the child with Rett syndrome

ii. Disease-causing mutation inherited from one parent who has somatic or germline mosaicism b. Several reports of familial recurrence support X-linked

dominant inheritance with lethality in hemizygous males

2. The region of interest has been localized to Xq28 by link- age analysis from available familial cases

3. Caused by mutations in the MECP2 (methyl-CpG-binding protein 2) gene in Xq28

a. Result in a loss of function by either disrupting the methylated DNA-binding properties of the protein or interfering with its association with transcriptional co-repressors

b. MECP2 mutations in sporadic or atypical cases i. Up to 80% of sporadic affected females ii. One third of the clinically atypical cases c. MECP2 mutations in familial cases (lower incidence)

i. Germline mosaic mothers

ii. Asymptomatic carrier mothers due to nonran- dom patterns of X-inactivation. The pattern of X-inactivation most likely protects the mutation carriers from expression of the disease by prefer- ential inactivation of the mutant MECP2 allele 4. Males with MECP2 mutations may suffer from severe

neonatal encephalopathy and die from breathing difficul- ties before their second year. The almost absence of men with classic Rett syndrome suggests a lethal effect of the MECP2 mutation in hemizygous affected men. However, males with Rett syndrome are not always lethal, although neurologic impairment is slowly progressive and much more severe in men than in women

a. Affected men have been reported in association with Klinefelter syndrome and somatic mosaicism b. Most MECP2 mutations have originated in the pater-

nal germline. The paternal X MECP2 never passed on from father to their sons

c. Only way for a male to have Rett syndrome is a de novo mutation of a maternal X or inheritance of a MECP2 gene mutation from his mother

d. Caution: some reported MECP2 mutations may actu- ally represent genetic variant rather than true patho- genetic novel mutations in the MECP2 gene in males

CLINICAL FEATURES

1. Normal prenatal and perinatal history 2. Appropriate head circumference

3. Apparently normal psychomotor development until about 6 to 18 months of life in affected girls

4. Developmental milestones afterwards beginning to slow down and regress with loss of skills already achieved a. Deterioration of communicative skills

b. Social withdrawal

c. Loss of purposeful hand movement 5. Continued deterioration over the next few years

a. Loss of language

b. Poor motor function (truncal and gait apraxia/ataxia) c. Stereotypic hand movements (hand wringing and

flapping)

d. Deceleration of head growth (acquired microcephaly) e. Autistic behavior

6. Period of stabilization

a. Severe psychomotor dysfunction

b. Some patients may make small recoveries in contact and communication skills

7. Breathing difficulties a. Periodic apnea b. Hyperventilation c. Breath holding

d. Forced explosion of air/saliva e. Bruxism

8. Swallowing difficulties

9. Dystonia and hand and foot deformities as affected girls grow older

10. Later development of scoliosis 11. Osteoporosis at risk for fractures

12. Seizures (epilepsy) in 50% affected females

13. Possible survival into adulthood without further deterioration 14. An increased risk for sudden, unexplained death

a. Longer corrected QT intervals b. T-wave abnormalities

c. Reduced heart rate

15. Rett syndrome variants (<10% of cases)

a. Patients with a milder clinical course (‘forme fruste’

phenotype): considered to be the most common vari- ant of nonclassical Rett syndrome

i. Less dramatic regression

ii. Mild learning disability

iii. Milder mental retardation

839

(2)

iv. Preserved speech v. Ability to walk vi. Some hand use

vii. Usually without seizures

viii. No apparent symptoms observed in a few women who demonstrate skewed X chromo- some inactivation

b. Patients with a severe phenotype

i. Lack of normal postnatal developmental period ii. Congenital hypotonia

iii. Infantile spasms c. Patients with late regression d. Male patients with Rett syndrome

i. Males with XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) ii. Males with somatic mosaicism

iii. Males with XY (normal karyotype) 16. Clinical stages in classic Rett syndrome

a. Stagnation stage (6–18 months) i. Developmental arrest

ii. Deterioration of eye contact and possible loss of communication

b. Rapid destructive stage (1–4 years) i. Developmental deterioration ii. Loss of purposeful hand use iii. Stereotyped hand movements

iv. Autistic features v. Gait ataxia and apraxia

vi. Irregular breathing-hyperventilation

c. Pseudostationary stage (preschool-early school years) i. Mental retardation

ii. Decreased autistic features iii. Prominent gait ataxia and apraxia

iv. Gross motor dysfunction v. Seizures

d. Late motor deterioration stage (5–25 years) i. Decreased mobility

ii. Spasticity

iii. Improved emotional contact iv. Scoliosis

v. Cachexia and growth retardation vi. Staring, unfathomable gaze

17. Relatively restrictive international diagnostic criteria (Rett syndrome Diagnostic Criteria Work Group, 1988) a. Apparently normal prenatal and perinatal period*

b. Normal head circumference at birth

c. Apparently normal development through age six months*

d. Deceleration of head growth occurring anytime between ages three months and 48 months

e. Loss of acquired hand skills and purposeful hand use between ages five months and 30 months, with subsequent development of stereotyped hand movements

f. Severe impairment of expressive and receptive lan- guage together with severe psychomotor retardation g. Development of gait apraxia and truncal ataxia

between ages 12 months and 48 months

18. Modified diagnostic criteria (proposed by Clarke in 1996) a. Necessary criteria

i. Normal prenatal and perinatal development ii. Loss of acquired skills such as communication

and speech

iii. Normal head circumference at birth with acquired microcephaly

iv. Marked developmental delay v. Loss of hand skills

vi. Autistic features vii. Gait apraxia

viii. Stereotypic hand movements b. Supportive criteria

i. Seizures ii. Abnormal EEG iii. Apnea

iv. Hyperventilation

v. Breathing dysfunction with breath holding vi. Scoliosis

vii. Growth retardation viii. Cold feet

ix. Spasticity with muscle wasting

19. Wide spectrum of clinical features associated with an MECP2 mutation

a. Male patients with early-onset lethal encephalopathy b. Adult cases with severe mental retardation

c. Female cases i. Asymptomatic

ii. Mildly mentally retarded

iii. Severe variant of Rett syndrome with congenital onset

DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS

1. Mutational analyses of MECP2 gene

a. Sequence analysis and mutation scanning

b. Mutations detected in 35–90% of patients (detected in almost every patient with classical Rett syndrome) c. Wide spectrum of mutations of the MECP2 gene d. Mutations extending to phenotypes that are not easily

recognized as Rett syndrome

e. No significant correlation exists between the clinical course and mutation type

f. MECP2 mutations have been identified in patients previously diagnosed with the following conditions:

i. Autism

ii. Mild learning disability

iii. Clinically suspected but molecularly unconfirmed Angelman syndrome

iv. Mental retardation with spasticity or tremor 2. X-chromosome inactivation pattern: not tested routinely 3. EEG: not specific

4. CT and MRI

a. Cortical atrophy predominantly in the frontal area b. No abnormalities in the white matter, basal ganglia,

thalamus, or hippocampus

c. Narrowing of the brain stem in some patients 5. Photon emission CT

a. Lower cerebral blood flow in the prefrontal and tem- poroparietal association regions with sparing of the sensorimotor regions

*Clinical criteria “a” and “c” may not be applicable to severely

affected females; other criteria will not apply to those who are

mildly affected and are identified as having mutations in MECP2.

(3)

b. The flow distribution in Rett patients

i. Similar to that observed in infants of a few months of age

ii. Suggesting a neurodevelopmental abnormality rather than a neurodegenerative process

GENETIC COUNSELING

1. Recurrence risk a. Patient’s sib

i. 50% risk to sibs of inheriting MECP2 allele from the carrier mother

ii. Low risk to sibs when a mutation present in the proband is not identified in a parent, provided germline mosaicism is not present in either parent b. Patient’s offspring

i. Unlikely to have offspring due to mental retarda- tion and other handicaps

ii. Reproduction reported in mildly affected females a) Each offspring of a carrier female with 50% risk of inheriting the disease-causing mutation

b) Daughters who inherit the mutation are at high risk of developing classic Rett syndrome, although skewed X chromosome inactivation may result in a milder phenotype

c) Sons who inherit the mutation may suffer a severe neonatal encephalopathy or severe mental retardation in those who survive beyond the first year of age

iii. Healthy sisters of a girl with Rett syndrome a) Possibility of being carriers of the MECP2

mutation but with little or no symptoms because of favorable skewed X chromosome inactivation

b) At risk of transmitting the disease-causing MECP2 mutation to their own children iv. No male with a MECP2 mutation known to

reproduce 2. Prenatal diagnosis

a. Amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling available to pregnancies at risk for women with a known MECP2 mutation identified in a family member b. Appropriate to offer prenatal diagnosis to couples

who have had a child with Rett syndrome or mental retardation due to a MECP2 mutation, whether or not the disease-causing mutation has been identified in a parent, since germline mosaicism cannot be excluded in either parent

c. A male fetus with the mutation

i. May suffer from a severe neonatal encephalopathy ii. May survive with a severe mental retardation

syndrome

d. A female fetus with the mutation

i. Difficult to predict the phenotype in a female fetus with a MECP2 mutation which can range from apparently normal to severely affected ii. At high risk of developing classic Rett syn-

drome, although skewed X chromosome inacti- vation may result in a milder phenotype

3. Management

a. No treatment is known to improve the neurologic out- come of Rett patients

b. Supportive and symptomatic therapies i. Anticonvulsants for seizures ii. Chloral hydrate for agitation iii. Carbidopa and levodopa for rigidity

iv. Melatonin for sleep disturbances

v. Nutritional management to insure adequate caloric and fiber intake

vi. Management of gastroesophageal reflux a) Antireflux agents

b) Smaller and thickened feedings c) Positioning

c. Occupational and physical therapies i. Maintain function

ii. Prevent scoliosis and deformities d. Augmentative communication

e. Therapeutic horseback riding, swimming, and music therapy

REFERENCES

Amir RE. Zoghbi HY: Rett syndrome: methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 muta- tions and phenotype-genotype correlations. Am J Med Genet 97(2):147–152, 2000.

Amir RE, Van den Veyver IB, Wan M, et al.: Rett syndrome is caused by muta- tions in X-linked MECP2, encoding methyl-CpG-binding protein 2. Nat Genet 23:185–188, 1999.

Amir RE, Van den Veyver IB, Schultz R, et al.: Influence of mutation type and X chromosome inactivation on Rett syndrome phenotypes. Ann Neurol 47:670–679, 2000.

Auranen M, Vanhala R, Vosman M, et al.: MECP2 gene analysis in classical Rett syndrome and in patients with Rett-like features. Neurology 56:611–617, 2001.

Bienvenu T, Carrie A, de Roux N, et al.: MECP2 mutations account for most cases of typical forms of Rett syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 9:1377–1384, 2000.

Brandt BL, Zoghbi HY: Rett syndrome. Gene Reviews. www.genetest.org Budden SS: Rett syndrome: habilitation and management reviewed. Eur Child

Adolesc Psychiatry 6 [Suppl 1]:103–107, 1997.

Buyse IM, Fang P, Hoon KT, et al.: Diagnostic testing for Rett syndrome by DHPLC and direct sequencing analysis of the MeCP2 gene: identification of several novel mutations and polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 67:1428–1436, 2000.

Chelly J: MRX review. Am J Med Genet 94:364–366, 2000.

Clarke A: Rett syndrome. J Med Genet 33:693–699, 1996.

Clayton-Smith J, Watson P, Ramsden S, et al.: Somatic mutation in MECP2 as a non-fatal neurodevelopmental disorder in males. Lancet 356:830–832, 2000.

Couvert P, Bienvenu T, Aquaviva C, et al.: MECP2 is highly mutated in X-linked mental retardation. Hum Mol Genet 10:941–946, 2001.

De Bona C, Zappella M, Hayek G, et al.: preserved speech variant is allelic of classic Rett syndrome. Eur J Hum Genet 8:325–330, 2000.

Dotti MT, Orrico A, De Stefano N, et al.: A Rett syndrome MECP2 mutation that causes mental retardation in men. Neurology 58:226–230, 2001.

Ellaway C, Christodoulou J: Rett syndrome: clinical update and review of recent genetic advances. J Paediatr Child Health 35:419–426, 1999.

Hagberg B: Clinical delineation of Rett syndrome variants. Neuropediatrics 26:62, 1995.

Hagberg B: Rett syndrome: clinical peculiarities, diagnostic approach, and pos- sible cause. Pediatr Neurol 5:75–83, 1989.

Hagberg BA, Skjeldal OH: Rett variants: a suggested model for inclusion cri- teria. Pediatr Neurol 11:5–11, 1994.

Hagberg B, Aicardi J, Dias K, et al.: A progressive syndrome of autism, demen- tia, ataxia, and loss of purposeful hand use in girls: Rett’s syndrome:

report of 35 cases. Ann Neurol 14:471–479, 1983.

Hampson K, Woods Clin Genet, Latif F, et al.: Mutations in the MeCP2 gene in a cohort of girls with Rett syndrome. J Med Genet 37:610–612, 2000.

(4)

Heilstedt HA, Shahbazian MD, Lee B: Infantile hypotonia as a presentation of Rett syndrome. Am J Med Genet 111:238–242, 2002.

Hoffbuhr K, Devaney JM, LaFleur B, et al.: Neurology 56:1486–1495, 2001.

Huppke P, Laccone F, Kramer N, et al.: Rett syndrome: analysis of MECP2 and clinical characterization of 31 patients. Hum Mol Genet 9:1369–1375, 2000.

Imessaoudene B, Bonnefont JP, Royer G, et al.: MECP2 mutation in non- fatal, non-progressive encephalopathy in a male. J Med Genet 38:171–174, 2001.

Jan MM, Dooley JM, Gordon KE: Male Rett syndrome variant: application of diagnostic criteria. Pediatr Neurol 20:238–240, 1999.

Kozinetz CA, Skender ML, MacNaughton N, et al.: Epidemiology of Rett syn- drome: a population-based registry. Pediatrics 91:445–450, 1993.

Laccone F, Zoll B, Huppke P, et al.: MECP2 gene nucleotide changes and their pathogenicity in males: proceed with caution. J Med Genet 39:586–588, 2002.

Lombroso PJ: Genetics of childhood disorders: XIV. A gene for Rett syn- drome: new flash. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 39:671–674, 2000.

Meloni I, Bruttini M, Longo I, et al.: A mutation in the Rett syndrome gene, MECP2, causes X-linked mental retardation and progressive spasticity in males. Am J Hum Genet 67:982–985, 2000.

Naidu S: Rett syndrome: a disorder affecting early brain growth. Ann Neurol 42:3–10, 1997.

Obata K, Matsuishi T, Yamashita Y, et al.: Mutation analysis of methyl=CpG binding protein 2 gene (MeCP2) in patients with Rett syndrome. J Med Genet 37:608–610, 2000.

Orrico A, Lam C, Galli L, et al.: MECP2 mutation in male patients with non- specific mental retardation. REBS Lett 481:285–288, 2000.

Percy AK: Rett syndrome. Curr Opin Neurol 8:156–160, 1995.

Rett A: Über ein zerebral-atrophisches Syndrome bei Hyperammonemie.

Vienna, Austria: Bruder Hollinek, 1966.

Schwartzman JS, De Souza Ann Med, Faiwichow G, et al.: Rett phenotype in patient with XXY karyotype: case report. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 56:

824–828, 1998.

Shahbazian MD. Zoghbi HY. Molecular genetics of Rett syndrome and clinical spectrum of MECP2 mutations. Current Opinion in Neurology.

14(2):171–176, 200.

Schanen C, Francke U: A severely affected male born into a Rett syndrome kin- dred supports X-linked inheritance and allows extension of the exclusion map. Am J Hum Genet 63:267–269, 1998.

Singer HS: Rett syndrome “We’ll keep the genes on for you.” Neurology 56:582–584, 2001.

Sirianni N, Naidu S, Pereira J, et al.: Rett syndrome: confirmation of X-linked dominant inheritance, and localization of the gene to Xq28. Am J Hum Genet 63:1552–1558, 1998.

The Rett Syndrome Diagnostic Criteria Work Group: Diagnostic criteria for Rett syndrome. Ann Neurol 23:425–428, 1988.

Trappe R, Laccone F, Cobilanschi J, et al.: MECP2 mutations in sporadic cases of Rett syndrome are almost exclusively of paternal origin. Am J Hum Genet 68:1093–1101, 2001.

Villard L, Kpebe A, Cardoso C, et al.: Two affected boys in a Rett syndrome family. Neurology 55:1188–1193, 2000.

Wan M, Lee SS, Zhang X, et al.: Rett syndrome and beyond: recurrent sponta- neous and familial MECP2 mutations at CpG hotspots. Am J Hum Genet 65:1520–1529, 1999.

Webb T, Latif F: Rett syndrome and the MECP2 gene. J Med Genet 38:217–223, 2001.

Webb T, Clarke A, Hanefeld F, et al.: Linkage analysis in Rett syndrome fami- lies suggests that there may be a critical region at Xq28. J Med Genet 35:997–1003, 1998.

Xiang F, Buervenich S, Nicolao P, et al.: Mutation screening in Rett syndrome patients. J Med Genet 37:250–255, 2000.

Yusufzai TM, Wolffe AP: Functional consequences of Rett syndrome muta- tions on human MeCP2. Nucleic Acids Res 28:4172–4179, 2000.

Zoghbi HY, Francke U: Rett syndrome. In Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D (eds): The Metabolic & Molecular Bases of Inherited Disease.

8th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001.

Zoghbi HY. Gage FH. Choi DW. Neurobiology of disease. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 10(5):655–660, 2000.

(5)

Fig. 1. A girl with Rett syndrome.

Fig. 2. A girl with Rett syndrome who has MECP2 mutation (R106W).

Fig. 3. A 33-year-old female with Rett syndrome showing severe psy- chomotor retardation and hand wringing so severe that the part of the hand and fingers are red, rough, and swollen from constant irritation by stereotypic hand movement. She was normal developmentally until about 18 months of age when she started to have hand washing/

wringing, tip toe walking, fell easily, and lost the skills she already attained. Shortly after, she started to loose eye contact with people and have seizures. DNA sequence analysis identify a nucleotide change of 763C>T in one copy of the MECP2 gene which predicts an amino acid change of arginine to a premature translation stop at codon 255 (R255X). This nonsense mutation was previously identi- fied in multiple Rett syndrome patients as a disease-causing MECP2 mutation.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

In  regard  to  selectivity,  a  strong  effect  displayed  by  the  nanostructure  of  ceria  supports  (nanoparticles,  rod‐like  particles  and 

Activation of memory B cells (% CD25 þ ) in response to in vitro re-stimulation with the vaccine was greater in young subjects than in older subjects (LMM, effect of age, p &lt;

Quindi per le variabili “Valenza della recensione = Negativa” e “Risposta dell’albergo = No” si è riscontrata un’elevata significatività per “affidabile” (Sign

Se la Umwelt così come è pensata da Guardini resta vicina all’originale concetto uexkülliano per la sottolineatura della variabilità intraspecifica (che diviene, in lui,

L’apertura di un nuovo varco di ingresso al Porto Commerciale, il Varco Nord, garantirà una migliore accessibilità delle aree portuali rispetto alla grande viabilità e

Nel contesto romano, il protettore era il referente più accreditato per accogliere ed introdurre nella corte e nella società romana i vari «nazionali» giunti nella città del papa

Keywords: Panel data, fixed effects, spatial autoregression, Edgeworth expansion, interval estimates, tests for cross-sectional

Nitric oxide (NO) is produced by l-arginine. Treatment with arginine provoked resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato at three to six days after treatment. Endogenous NO