• Non ci sono risultati.

AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture - An industry-wide initiative to manage the complexity of emerging Automotive E/E-Architectures

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture - An industry-wide initiative to manage the complexity of emerging Automotive E/E-Architectures"

Copied!
11
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Development partnership with:

BMW Group Bosch Continental

AUTomotive Open System ARchitecture - An industry-wide initiative to manage the complexity of emerging Automotive

E/E-Architectures

(2)

Table of Content

1. Introduction ...3

Motivations for change ...3

AUTOSAR Partnership and standard ...4

2. Description ...6

Overview ...6

3. Benefits...7

4. AUTOSAR Initiative...8

5. Schedule ...9

6. Summary...10

7. References...11

Website ...11

Publication...11

(3)

1. Introduction

The current automotive electric/electronic (E/E) architecture landscape is characterized by proprietary solutions that seldom allow the exchange of applications between both automotive OEMs and their suppliers. However the exponential growth in functional scope will require an increase re-use even across OEMs and suppliers.

In the past, the automotive industry had to react response on major technological advances in order to address such challenges. Recent examples include the transition from analog to digital bus systems and the introduction of deterministic technologies.

A technological breakthrough is required in order to control the complexity of contemporary E/E architecture that is being driven by the introduction of innovative vehicle applications and increased passenger and legal requirements.

This need is particularly effective for high-end, luxury vehicle manufacturers and their leading Tier 1 suppliers who are facing with often-conflicting requirements from

• Legal enforcement – key items include environmental aspects and safety requirements

• Passenger convenience and service requirements from the comfort and entertainment functional domains

• Driver assistance and dynamic drive aspects - key items include detection and suppression of critical dynamic vehicle states and navigation in high-density traffic surroundings.

Motivations for change

Motivations for change are

• Management of E/E complexity associated with growth in functional scope

• Flexibility for product modification, upgrade and update

• Scalability of solutions within and across product lines

• Improved quality and reliability of E/E systems

Leading OEMs (BMW Group, DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Company, PSA Peugeot Citroën, Toyota Motor Corporation, Volkswagen AG) and Tier 1 suppliers (Bosch, Continental, Siemens VDO), having recognized this to be an industry-wide challenge, have now decided to work together. Their common objective is to create a basis for industry collaboration on basic functions and interfaces while providing a standardized platform on which an efficient competition on innovative functions is enabled.

(see Figure 1)

(4)

Figure 1: AUTOSAR Target of Exchangeability of functions between OEM and suppliers

AUTOSAR Partnership and standard

A development partnership called Automotive Open System Architecture (AUTOSAR) has recently been formed. The AUTOSAR standard will serve as a platform upon which future vehicle applications will be implemented and will also serve to minimize the current barriers between functional domains. Its scope encompasses Powertrain, Chassis, Safety (active and passive), Multimedia/Telematics, Body/Comfort and Man Machine Interface functional domains. Applied to all previously cited functional domains, primary objectives (see Figure 2) are

Consideration of availability and safety requirements

Redundancy design and activation. Redundant activation is the ability to internally activate redun- dant functionalities.

Scalability to different vehicle and platform variants

Implementation and standardization of basic system functions as an OEM wide “Standard Core“ solution. Initial focus for the integration of basic system functions and technologies are:

o Bus Technologies (MOST, FlexRay, CAN, LIN, ...) o Operating Systems (OSEK/time, ...)

o Communication Layer, OSEK/COM, OSEK fault tolerance, API*

o HW Abstraction Layer

o Middleware/ Interfaces – APIs

o Standard Library Functions (CRC checksum, Cast Operations, Simple mathematical functions,

…)

Transferability of functions throughout network. It will be possible to map functions and functional networks to different control nodes in the system, almost independently from the associated hardware.

Integration of functional modules from multiple suppliers

Exchangeability

between manufacturer’s applications

Platform 2.nPlatform 2.2Platform 2.1

OEM b

Platform d.nPlatform d.2 Platform d.1

OEM d

Exchangeability

between supplier’s solutions Supplier B

Chassis Safety Telematics Multimedia Supplier A

Chassis Safety Body/Comfort Multimedia

Supplier C Chassis Body/Comfort

Telematics Multimedia OEM a

Platform 1.nPlatform 1.2Platform 1.1

Exchangeability

between vehicle platforms

Platform c.nPlatform c.2Platform c.1

OEM c

Platform e.nPlatform e.2Platform e.1 OEM e

Platform f.nPlatform f.2Platform f.1 OEM f

(5)

Maintainability throughout the whole “Product Life Cycle“

Increased use of “Commercial off the shelf hardware“

Software updates and upgrades over vehicle lifetime

Figure 2: AUTOSAR high level project objectives

Cooperate on standards, compete on implementation Consideration of availability and safety requirements

Redundancy activation

Scalability to different vehicle and platform variants Implementation and standardization of basic system functions as an OEM wide “Standard Core“ solution Transferability of functions throughout network Integration of functional modules from multiple suppliers Maintainability throughout the whole “Product Life Cycle“

Increased use of “Commercial off the shelf hardware“

Software updates and upgrades over vehicle lifetime

Project Objectives Functional Domains

Powertrain

Chassis Safety

(active/

passive) AUTOSAR Multi-

media/

Telematics

Man Machine Interface Body/

Comfort Vehicle

´centric‘

Passenger

´centric‘

(6)

2. Description

Overview

To achieve the technical goals modularity, scalability, transferability and re-usability of functions AUTOSAR will provide a common software infrastructure for automotive systems of all vehicle domains based on standardized interfaces.

AUTOSAR standard encompasses:

• Standardization of different APIs to separate the AUTOSAR SW layers

• Facilitate encapsulation of functional SW-components

• Definition of the data types of the SW-components to be AUTOSAR compliant

• Identify basic SW modules of the SW infrastructure and standardize their interfaces A schematic view of AUTOSAR SW layers are shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Schematic view of AUTOSAR software architecture

AUTOSAR will enable system-wide as well as configuration process optimization (e.g. partitioning and resource usage) and if required, allow for local optimization to meet the runtime requirements of specific devices and hardware constraints.

Microcontroller Abstraction

AUTOSAR RTE Basic Software

OperatingSystem*

ECU Hardware ...

SW-Component 1 AUTOSAR

Interface AUTOSAR

Interface AUTOSAR

Interface SW-Component

2

SW-Component n

Transfer layers for different communication technologies (e.g. CAN, LIN, …) Network management

System services (diagnostic protocols, …) NVRAM management

(7)

3. Benefits

The focus areas of this strategy are the modularity, configurability and transferability of SW modules and the standardization of their interfaces.

Functional transferability will enable the shift from proprietary to standard solutions resulting in the following benefits:

• Increased reuse of SW IP

• Increased design flexibility

• Clear design rules for integration

• Reduction of total SW development and service costs Benefits for OEM:

• OEM overlapping reuse of non-competitive software modules

• Protection of innovation and competitive functions is in focus at OEM

• Later sharing of innovations is accessible (additional ROI)

• Focus on innovation/ functions

• Standardized certification Benefits for Supplier:

• Reduction of version proliferation

• Development partitioning among suppliers

• Increase of efficiency in functional development

• New business models possible

• Preparation for upcoming increase in software volume Benefits for tool provider:

• Common interfaces with development processes

• Seamless, manageable, task optimized (time dependent) tool landscape Benefits for new market entrant:

• Transparent and defined interfaces enable new business models

• Clear contractual task allocation and outsourcing of Software-Implementation accessible

(8)

4. AUTOSAR Initiative

The AUTOSAR partners have been in active discussions since October 2002 and the partnership agreement was signed in July 2003. The partnership has adopted a three-tier membership structure that has been proven in similar initiatives. Each tier of the partnership has specific rights and duties that are outlined in appropriate agreements (See Figure 4).

Figure 4: Three-tier membership structure of AUTOSAR

Core partners have organizational and administrative control, make technical contributions and determine the information to be distributed externally. Currently the core partners are BMW Group, Bosch, Continental, DaimlerChrysler, Ford Motor Company, PSA Peugeot Citroën, Siemens VDO, Toyota Motor Corporation, and Volkswagen AG. Strong interest has been shown by further leading OEMs to join as core partners and discussions to this end are ongoing.

Premium members participate in and can lead working groups, make technical contributions and have access to current information.

Associate members may use the standards and have access to finalized documents before release to public.

The partnership will also welcome third parties to join as Development members or Attendees, both of whose participation is free of charge.

Development Member participates in and co-operates with the Partnership in one or more Working Groups in accordance with further instructions and guidelines from the Partnership.

Attendee contributes to the establishment of close connections between corporate research and development work undertaken by the Partnership and commercially independent, non-corporate research and development work represented by the Attendee and the institution which he represents.

Core Partner

(max. 7/8, OEM & Tier 1 Supplier) Organizational control Technical contributions Administrative control Definition of external Information (web-release, clearance, etc.) Leadership of Working groups Involvement in Working groups

Premium Members (incl. Tool Manufacturers)

Leadership of Working groups Involvement in Working groups Technical contributions Access to current information Associate Members

Access to finalized documents Utilization of Standards

Rights and Duties Contract Sections

Development Agreement

Premium Member Agreement

Associate Member Agreement

Support Roles Development Member Agreement Attendee Agreement

(9)

5. Schedule

The admission process has been formally initiated from the 25. September 2003.

Figure 5: Timeline of AUTOSAR project

The project structure is divided into four sections. In the startup phase the partnership was initiated by setting up a detailed work plan and project management. Phase 2 is determined by the definition of interface specification and AUTOSAR concept harmonization. In Phase 3 focus is set on the standardization of the software components. The phase of testing and integration will finalize the development phase of the AUTOSAR standard.

Milestones Initiation of Partnership

Structure & Basis Specification

Standardization of the SW-Components

Test- & Integration- process

05/03 09/04 11/05 08/06

Phases

Project plan created and agreed

AUTOSAR Concept and first specification are created and executabilityis approved

AUTOSAR compa- tibilityof selected SW components is approved. First tools and generators are in place.

AUTOSAR specifications are tested and verified on an application

(10)

6. Summary

The introduction of the AUTOSAR standard will place the future of E/E- development in automotive industry on a commonly accepted and stable basis. This will be the key element in order to cope with the functional and legal requirements in next generation vehicle architectures. In addition the increasing uptake of software solutions is placed on reliable design basis allowing for functional (re-) integration and concentration on the development of real new and novel functionalities. The standardization in AUTOSAR is mandatory in the automotive industry in order to secure market attractiveness.

(11)

7. References

Website

http://www.autosar.org

Publication

VDA Congress "Safety through Electronics", 20. - 21. March 2002, Stuttgart, Germany, Proceedings of the Technical Congress 2002, p. 267 - 276.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

In addition, improvements in the efficiency of upstream production chain (e.g., through the application of Process Integration methodology), will also help reduce the carbon

In fact, (few) studies were mainly focused on residential building to evaluate their ventilation heat losses [18, 23]. To this purpose, in the present paper were evaluated:

• Identification of basic software modules of the soft- ware infrastructure and standardize their interfaces AUTOSAR will enable optimization of the entire vehicle network as well

CD4 Th2 cellular immunity The Th2 subset of CD4 cells secrete IL4, 5 and 13 and improve B cell responses to antigens associated with mucosal disease, however their role in

And it permits individuals to reconnect the learning of the discipline to the broader context of their own being-in-the-world (the ethical dimension of learning math, in the

following chapters since it is the only network protocol used in this thesis; in chapter 5, my architecture for adaptive cruise control functionality using the PREEvision software

In addition, the radar system of FSK (Frequency shift keying) waveform has high velocity resolution and can avoid the ghost targets, but it is unable to measure the stationary

- a single statement of the design problem of a hydraulic circuit of an intelligent heating system with required transmission capacity and indices of hydraulic stability