• Non ci sono risultati.

e Vinci, T., 1983, Novel Confirmation, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "e Vinci, T., 1983, Novel Confirmation, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol"

Copied!
4
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Bibliografia

Amsterdamski, S., “Caso/probabilità”, in Enciclopedia Einaudi, vol. 2, pagg. 668-687.

Campbell, R. e Vinci, T., 1983, Novel Confirmation, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, vol. 34, 315 – 341.

"Doob, J. L., 1971, What Is a Martingale?, American Mathematical Monthly 78:451-462.

Earman, J., 1992, Bayes or Bust?, Cambridge, The MIT Press.

Earman, J., ed. 1983, Testing Scientific Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 10, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

EeIls, E., 1985, Problems of Old Evidence, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66:283-302.

Fisher, R. A., 1968, citato in Rosenkrantz, R. D., 1977, Inference, Method and Decision: Towards a Bayesian Philosophy of Science, Boston, D. Reidel Publishing Co.

Fayerabend, P., 1975, Against Method, Londra, New Left Books.

Gaifman, H., and Snir, M., 1982, Probabilities over Rich Languages, Journal of Symbolic Logic 47:495-548.

Garber, D., 1983. Old Evidence and Logical Omniscience in Bayesian Confirmation Theory, In Earman 1983.

Gillies, D., 1986, In Defense of the Popper-Miller Argument, Philosophy of Science 53: 111-113.

Giere, R., 1984, Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 2nd ed., New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Glymour, C., 1980, Theory and Evidence. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

(2)

Goodman, N., 1954, Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Londra, The Athlone Press.

Grümbaum, A., 1976, Is Falsifiability the Touchstone of Scientific Rationality? Karl Popper versus Inductivism, In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend, and M. W. Wartofsky, eds., Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos (Dordrecht: D. Reidel).

Hacking, I., 1967, Slightly More Realistic Personal Probability, Philosophy of Science, vol. 34, 311 – 325.

Hacking, I., 2001, An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic, Cambridge, Press Syndicate;

tradotto come “Introduzione alla Probabilità e alla Logica Induttiva”, 2005, Milano, il Saggiatore.

Hajek, A., 2011, Interpretations of Probability, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy;

URL: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/probabilityinterpret/>.

Hanson, N. R., 1960, Is There a Logic of Scientific Discovery?, The Australiasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 38, No. 2.

Hempel, C. G., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press.

Hempel, C. G., 1945, Studies in the Logic of Confirmation; ristampato in Hempel, C., G., 1965.

Howson, C., 1984, Bayesianism and Support by Novel Facts, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35:245-251.

Howson, C., 1985, Some Recent Objections to the Bayesian Theory of Support, British Journal for the Philosophy·of Science 36:305-309.

Howson, C. and Urbach, P., 1989, Scientific Reasoning: the Bayesian Approach, La Salle Illinois, Open Court Publishing Company.

Jeffrey, R. C., 1984, The Impossibility of Inductive Probability, Nature 310: 433.

Jeffrey, R. C., 1983, The Logic of Decision, 2nd ed., New York: McGraw-Hill.

Jeffreys, H., 1961, Theory of Probability, terza edizione, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

(3)

Lehrer, K., and Wagner, C., 1981, Rational Consensus in Science and Society, Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Keynes, J. M., 1962, A Treatise on Probability, New York: Harper and Row.

Kuhn, T. S., 1970, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S., 1977, Objectivity, Value Judgments, and Theory Choice, In The Essential Tension (Chicago: University ofChicago Press).

Kolmogorov, A. N., 1933, Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung , Ergebnisse Der Mathematik; tradotto come “Foundations of Probability”, 1950, New York, Chelsea Publishing Company.

Miller, R., 1987, Fact and Method, Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Niiniluoto, I., 1983, Novel Facts and Bayesianism, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34:

375-379.

Press, S. J., e Tanur, J. M., (2001) The Subjectivity of Scientists and the Bayesian Approach, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Popper, K., and Miller, D. W., 1983, A Proof of the Impossibility oflnductive Probability, Nature 302:687-688.

Salmon, W. C., 1967, The Foundations of Scientific Inference, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press.

Salmon, W., 1990, Rationality and Objectivity in Science, or Tom Kuhn Meets Tom Bayes, In C. W.

Savage, ed., Scientific Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 14 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press)

Seelig, C., 1956, Albert Einstein: A Documentary Biography, London: Staples Press.

(4)

Shimony, A., 1970, Scientific Inference In R. G. Colodny, ed., The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).

Thorne, K. S., and Will, C. M., 1971, Theoretical Frameworks for Testing Relativistic Gravity. I:

Foundations, Astrophysical Journal 163:595-610.

Velikovsky, I., 1950, Worlds in Collision, Londra, Victor Gollancz Ltd.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

At the centre of this longstanding concern on the politics and society of Lebanon lies mainly a recurring problématique on sectarianism, confessional affiliation and

a computational problem expressed by a specification has solutions by a multiplicity of different algorithms, which can differ for some important properties but are all equally valid

The FT-IR spectrum of sample from of the waterproo fing treat- ment of the interior surfaces of an amphora shows the typical transmittance pro file of a diterpenoid resin such as that

“The Theory of Human Capital Revisited: On the Interaction of General and Specific Investments.” The Economic Journal, Vol... “The Effects of The Minimum Wage on

As the third, and final step of the construction of the semantic core we consider the theory CT½S obtained by expanding the language of the theory S with a truth predicate not

(2001): “Nominal rigidities and the dynamic effects of a shock to monetary policy”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland working paper.. (1994):“Time series

The theoretical framework is summarised in Figure 1, showing the proposed causal relationships between attitude of consumer towards CSR, consumer responsiveness to considering CSR as

We can also identify distinctions between the two major genres of intermediary articles — as queried through Q3: “Do differences between genres of intermediary articles (press