• Non ci sono risultati.

Plasma Cortisol: Time to Look Deeper? J. Cohen, J. Prins, and B. Venkatesh

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Plasma Cortisol: Time to Look Deeper? J. Cohen, J. Prins, and B. Venkatesh"

Copied!
7
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

J. Cohen, J. Prins, and B. Venkatesh

Introduction

The importance of the stress response in survival from critical illness is not in dis- pute. Adrenalectomized animals or patients with documented adrenal insufficiency have a high mortality when exposed to physiological stress [1, 2]. However, in the setting of critical illness, attempting to determine what constitutes an appropriate stress response is not straightforward.

Evidence of activation of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis is a frequently used sur- rogate for induction of the stress response. In the normal patient population, inves- tigation of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis centers around measure- ments of plasma cortisol, often before and following stimulation with high doses of synthetic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Criteria have been developed based on hormonal profiles and responses to stimulation tests to define inadequate stress responses or a condition which is loosely termed relative adrenal insufficiency.

Whilst there is acceptance of the concept of relative adrenal insufficiency, the diag- nostic criteria for it, based on plasma cortisol and the response to ACTH, continue to generate controversy. These issues have been reviewed at length in a recent publi- cation by Venkatesh et al. [3].

Interest has begun to turn to free cortisol estimation, and early work in this area is encouraging [4, 5]. An area which has received little attention in critical illness, but is gaining widespread consideration in endocrine practice, is the extent of alter- ation in cortisol metabolism, which in turn will determine the exposure of tissues to adequate concentrations of cortisol.

Normal Cortisol Metabolism

Cortisol, the major glucocorticoid synthesized by the adrenal cortex plays a pivotal role in normal metabolism. Its secretion is under the control of the hypothalamic pituitary axis. There are a variety of stimuli to secretion, including stress, tissue damage, cytokine release, hypoxia, hypotension and hypoglycemia. These factors act upon the hypothalamus to favor the release of corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) and vasopressin. These in turn stimulate the secretion of ACTH, which stim- ulates the release of cortisol, mineralocorticoids (principally aldosterone), and androgens from the adrenal cortex. During periods of stress, trauma or infection, there is an increase in CRH and ACTH secretion and a reduction in the negative feedback effect, resulting in increased cortisol levels, in amounts roughly propor- tional to the severity of the illness [6 – 8].

(2)

Fig. 1. The cortisol – cortisone shuttle

The majority of circulating cortisol is bound to an alpha-globulin called transcortin (corticosteroid-binding globulin, CBG). At normal concentrations of total plasma cortisol (e.g., 375 nmol/l or 13.5 µg/dl) less than 5 % exists as free cortisol in the plasma; however, it is this free fraction that is biologically active. In normal subjects CBG can bind approximately 700 nmol/l (i.e., 25 µg/dl) [9]. At levels greater than this, the increase in plasma cortisol is largely in the unbound fraction. CBG is a sub- strate for elastase, a polymorphonuclear enzyme that cleaves CBG, markedly decreasing its affinity for cortisol [10]. This enzymatic cleavage results in the libera- tion of free cortisol at sites of inflammation. CBG levels have been documented to fall during critical illness [4, 11, 12], and these changes are postulated to increase the amount of circulating free cortisol.

Until recently, it was believed that the major determinant of cortisol activity in vivo was the plasma free cortisol concentration. However, it has become apparent that cortisol activity inside cells is modulated by the actions of an enzyme system, the 11 q hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, type 1 (11 q -HSD1) and type 2 (11 q -HSD2).

These enzymes are responsible for the interconversion of active cortisol and inactive cortisone (Fig. 1) [13]. The concentration of cortisol at the receptor site is critical in determining its action and is a balance between synthesis and metabolism. Whilst a number of enzymes play a role in the metabolism of cortisol (11q -HSD, 5 alpha and beta reductases, and 6 beta hydroxylase), quantitatively the activity of 11q -HSD is the most important pathway (Table 1). 11q -HSD modulates the selectivity, specific- ity, and intensity of glucocorticoid dependent processes and regulates intracellular concentrations of cortisone (inactive) and active cortisol. The enzyme was discov- ered in 1953 by Amelung and colleagues who described the interconversion of corti- sol and cortisone [14]. The 11q -HSD1 isoform has a widespread expression through- out the body, being found primarily in liver, lung, adipose tissue, vascular tissue, ovary, and central nervous system (CNS). Its primary action in vivo appears to be reductase, catalyzing the formation of active cortisol from inactive cortisone. Previ- ously it was thought the enzyme was bi-directional in action, but it now appears that it only exhibits dehydrogenase activity in disrupted cells. The reason for this is not clear, but it may be related to the specific intracellular localization of the enzyme [15]. Conversely 11q -HSD2 functions physiologically only in the dehydrogenase mode, catalyzing the formation of cortisone from cortisol. 11q -HSD2 has its major site of action in the kidney, where it functions to inactivate cortisol prior to its bind- ing and activation of the mineralocorticoid receptor. The tissue distribution of these

(3)

Table 1. Structure and activity of the 11q -HSD enzymatic system

11q -HSD1 11q -HSD2

Structure Bidirectional, but mainly reduc-

tase, NADPH cofactor

Dehydrogenase, NAD cofactor

Function Converts cortisone to cortisol Converts cortisol to cortisone

Tissue Liver, lung, gonads, pituitary,

brain

Kidney, colon, salivary glands, placenta

Inhibition by carbenoxolone Moderate Strong

enzymes plays a major role in the regulation of glucocorticoid and mineralocorti- coid receptor activation. For example, the higher concentration of 11q -HSD2 in the kidney prevent excess mineralocorticoid effects in the renal tubules from circulating cortisol. Similarly, in the placenta, 11q -HSD2 protects the fetus from the deleterious effects of maternal glucocorticoids.

The set point of total body 11q -HSD1 vs. 11 q -HSD2 activity may be estimated by measuring the serum ratio of total cortisol to total cortisone (F:E ratio) [16 – 18].

The normal plasma F:E ratio ranges between 4 – 7 [19]. Abnormalities of the HSD enzyme system and, therefore, altered metabolism of cortisol have been implicated in the pathogenesis of hypertension, obesity, vascular disease, and the metabolic syndrome [20 – 23].

Role of 11␤-HSD Activity in Human Disease Syndrome of Apparent Mineralocorticoid Excess

Defects in the gene encoding for 11q -HSD have been described in patients suffering from apparent mineralocorticoid excess, an extremely rare inherited hypertensive disorder [24]. The condition is characterized by low levels of renin and aldosterone, severe hypertension and hypokalemia. This syndrome is thought to be caused by defective peripheral conversion of cortisol to cortisone. Patients thus appear to be suffering from excess mineralocorticoid activity, despite measured levels being reduced. The lack of 11q -HSD2 activity in these individuals allows cortisol to acti- vate the mineralocorticoid receptor and function as a potent mineralocorticoid.

Management by blocking the mineralocorticoid receptor with spironolactone appears to be effective.

Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome

The role of 11-q HSD1 appears to be to increase glucocorticoid activity in tissues in which it is expressed. Its potential importance in the pathogenesis of a wide variety of common clinical conditions is now becoming apparent. Mice with an over expres- sion of 11q -HSD1 in adipose tissue have been shown to have higher levels of gluco- corticoids in the portal vein, and exhibit obesity, hyperglycemia, and hypertension [25]. This observation, coupled with studies in human obese subjects, has led to the suggestion that 11q -HSD1 activity may be associated with the development of the metabolic syndrome, a group of cardiovascular risk factors including insulin resis- tance, hypertension, and obesity. Early work on selective 11q -HSD1 inhibitors in

(4)

animal models has demonstrated decreases in blood glucose, triglycerides, and body weight [26].

Miscellaneous

11q -HSD1 activity has also been associated with the development of osteoporosis [27], the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome [28], and in the regulation of vascular tone [29].

Activation of 11␤-HSD in Stress and Critical Illness

While there has been a great deal of interest in the local tissue activity of the 11q - HSD system, there has been relatively little work into its systemic role. Relative changes in the activity of the isoenzymes could influence glucocorticoid availability at a tissue level. This would be of particular relevance in patients subjected to a sig- nificant stress response.

There are some limited human data to support the notion that an upregulation of 11q -HSD-1 occurs in response to stress. Vogeser et al. examined the serum of 15 unselected hospitalized patients having C-reactive protein (CRP) estimations. Using the serum F:E ratio as a marker of the set point of total body HSD activity they dem- onstrated a significant correlation between elevated CRP levels and the F:E ratio (r = 0.56, p 0.001); multivariate regression analysis showed that this association was independent of serum cortisol [30]. The same group used a similar methodology to determine HSD activity in cardiac surgical patients. Postoperatively, they were able to demonstrate a significant increase in the F: E ratio as compared to the preopera- tive level (11.3 vs. 5.4, p 0.001), which persisted throughout the four days of the study [31]. In contrast, the serum cortisol level doubled on the first postoperative day, but then declined. The authors hypothesized that these data suggested that after surgical stress increased activity of 11q -HSD1 would be a more chronic response, acting to increase glucocorticoid action at a tissue level, despite declining plasma cortisol concentrations.

To our knowledge there are currently no published data examining 11q -HSD activity in the critically ill. However, our group has produced some data (unpub- lished) in patients with severe sepsis, trauma, and burns which support the previous findings. Persistent elevations in F:E ratios in patients suffering stress suggest that the set point of 11q -HSD activity is shifted towards reductase activity; this implies that the tissue activity of cortisol is increased, despite steady or even declining serum cortisol concentrations.

Mechanisms Behind Activation of 11␤-HSD in Critical Illness

Multiple mechanisms might come into play to account for the differential regulation of the 11q -HSD enzyme systems. The observed increase in the F:E ratio could be explained by substrate overload of 11q -HSD2; however, if this were the case, plasma cortisol concentrations and the F:E ratio would be expected to change in parallel, which was not observed [31]. Direct mediation by ACTH is also unlikely given that F:E ratios have been shown to increase in non-ACTH-dependent hypercortisolism [32].

(5)

More likely mechanisms would be enhancement by inflammatory mediators, and transcriptional regulation from other hormones. Pro-inflammatory cytokines have been demonstrated in vitro to upregulate 11q -HSD1 activity. Studies on cell cultures have demonstrated that tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-[ enhances cortisol availability to the cell by enhancing the activity of 11q -HSD1 and suppressing that of 11 q -HSD2 [33, 34]. Such effects have been demonstrated in a variety of cell types including smooth muscle [35], lung epithelium [36], and adipose tissue [37].

Hormones acting on 11q -HSD1 expression include glucocorticoids, growth hor- mone, sex steroids, insulin, and thyroid hormone. Glucocorticoids increase expres- sion, whilst growth hormone decreases it; the effect of the other hormones appears to vary from tissue to tissue and among species [38].

Other potential mechanisms for altered 11q -HSD1 activity include changes in redox potential within the cell. The oxo-reductase activity seen in intact cells requires NADPH and leads to the activation of glucocorticoids. Thus, concentrations of NADPH (which in turn are determined by cytosolic redox) influence the activity of the enzyme [39]. Critically ill septic patients frequently demonstrate alterations in cellular redox potential mediated largely by endotoxin [40]. Patients with trauma and burns may also demonstrate changes in redox resulting from altered tissue per- fusion [41].

Hypotheses for Future Research

Clearly the investigation of glucocorticoid activity at a tissue level in critically ill patients is at a very early stage. However, the recognition that a significant level of control is being exerted that is not directly observable from plasma cortisol mea- surements is of interest. An intriguing possibility is that measurements of 11q -HSD activity, either by F:E ratio or direct tissue estimation, may serve as valid markers for HPA axis activity in septic patients. It could be hypothesized that downregula- tion of 11q -HSD1 activity or an increase in 11 q -HSD2 activity would lead to tissue hypocortisolism, manifesting as hypotension and inotrope dependence. This group of patients may benefit from steroid administration. Conversely, an upregulation of 11q -HSD1 activity, and/or downregulation of 11 q -HSD2, would lead to an excess of tissue cortisol activity, manifesting as hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. In these patients, selective 11q -HSD1 inhibitors, such as benzothiazole derivatives, may have a role [42]. Further studies examining the tissue activity of each 11q -HSD isoen- zyme, and of a size large enough to detect an association with outcome would be required to investigate this possibility.

References

1. Hinshaw LB, Beller BK, Chang AC, et al (1985) Corticosteroid/antibiotic treatment of adre- nalectomized dogs challenged with lethal E. coli. Circ Shock 16:265 – 277

2. Rothwell PM, Udwadia ZF, Jackson EA, Lawler PJ (1991) Plasma cortisol levels in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 19:589 – 590

3. Venkatesh B, Prins J, Torpy D, et al (2007) Relative adrenal insufficiency in sepsis : Match- point or deuce. Crit Care Resusc (in press)

4. Hamrahian AH, Oseni TS, Arafah BM. (2004) Measurements of serum free cortisol in criti- cally ill patients. N Engl J Med 350:1629 – 1638

5. Ho JT, Al-Musalhi H, Chapman MJ, et al (2006) Septic shock and sepsis: a comparison of total and free plasma cortisol levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:105 – 114

(6)

6. Esteban NV, Loughlin T, Yergey AL, et al (1991) Daily cortisol production rate in man deter- mined by stable isotope dilution/mass spectrometry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 72:39 – 45 7. Barton RN, Stoner HB, Watson SM (1987) Relationships among plasma cortisol, adrenocorti-

cotrophin, and severity of injury in recently injured patients. J Trauma 27:384 – 392 8. Chernow B, Alexander HR, Smallridge RC, Thompson WR, Cook D, Beardsley D, Fink MP,

Lake CR, Fletcher JR (1987) Hormonal responses to graded surgical stress. Arch Intern Med 147:1273 – 1278

9. Burchard K (2001) A review of the adrenal cortex and severe inflammation: quest of the

“eucorticoid” state. J Trauma 51:800 – 814

10. Pemberton PA, Stein PE, Pepys MB, Potter JM, Carrell RW (1988) Hormone binding globulins undergo serpin conformational change in inflammation. Nature 336:257 – 258

11. Beishuizen A, Thijs LG, Vermes I (2001) Patterns of corticosteroid-binding globulin and the free cortisol index during septic shock and multitrauma. Intensive Care Med 27:1584 – 1591 12. le Roux CW, Chapman GA, Kong WM, Dhillo WS, Jones J, Alaghband-Zadeh J (2003) Free

cortisol index is better than serum total cortisol in determining hypothalamic-pituitary-adre- nal status in patients undergoing surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:2045 – 2048

13. Draper N, Stewart PM (2005) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and the pre-receptor reg- ulation of corticosteroid hormone action. J Endocrinol 186:251 – 271

14. Amelung D, Hubener HJ, Roka L, Meyerheim G (1953) Conversion of cortisone to compound F. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 13:1125 – 1126

15. Seckl JR, Walker BR (2001) Minireview: 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1- a tis- sue-specific amplifier of glucocorticoid action. Endocrinology 142:1371 – 1376

16. Dotsch J, Hohenberger I, Peter M, Sippell W, Dorr HG (2000) Evidence for change of 11beta- hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase activity during infancy and childhood. Pediatr Res 48:697 – 700

17. Houang M, Morineau G, le Bouc Y, Fiet J, Gourmelen M (1999) The cortisol-cortisone shuttle in children born with intrauterine growth retardation. Pediatr Res 46:189 – 193

18. Quinkler M, Zehnder D, Lepenies J, et al (2005) Expression of renal 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 is decreased in patients with impaired renal function. Eur J Endocrinol 153:291 – 299

19. Kushnir MM, Neilson R, Roberts WL, Rockwood AL (2004) Cortisol and cortisone analysis in serum and plasma by atmospheric pressure photoionization tandem mass spectrometry.

Clin Biochem 37:357 – 362

20. Tomlinson JW, Stewart PM (2001) Cortisol metabolism and the role of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 15:61 – 78

21. Ferrari P, Lovati E, Frey FJ (2000) The role of the 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in human hypertension. J Hypertens 18:241 – 248

22. Walker EA, Stewart PM (2003) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: unexpected connec- tions. Trends Endocrinol Metab 14:334 – 339

23. White PC, Mune T, Agarwal AK (1997) 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and the syn- drome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess. Endocr Rev 18:135 – 156

24. Mune T, Rogerson FM, Nikkila H, Agarwal AK, White PC (1995) Human hypertension caused by mutations in the kidney isozyme of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Nat Genet 10:394 – 399

25. Masuzaki H, Paterson J, Shinyama H, et al (2001) A transgenic model of visceral obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Science 294:2166 – 2170

26. Hermanowski-Vosatka A, Balkovec JM, Cheng K, et al (2005) 11beta-HSD1 inhibition amelio- rates metabolic syndrome and prevents progression of atherosclerosis in mice. J Exp Med 202:517 – 527

27. Cooper MS, Rabbitt EH, Goddard PE, Bartlett WA, Hewison M, Stewart PM (2002) Osteoblas- tic 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity increases with age and glucocorti- coid exposure. J Bone Miner Res 17:979 – 986

28. Stewart PM, Shackleton CH, Beastall GH, Edwards CR (1990) 5 alpha-reductase activity in polycystic ovary syndrome. Lancet 335:431 – 433

29. Young MJ, Moussa L, Dilley R, Funder JW (2003) Early inflammatory responses in experi- mental cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis: effects of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inactivation. Endocrinology 144:1121 – 1125

(7)

30. Vogeser M, Zachoval R, Felbinger TW, Jacob K (2002) Increased ratio of serum cortisol to cortisone in acute-phase response. Horm Res 58:172 – 175

31. Vogeser M, Groetzner J, Kupper C, Briegel J (2003) The serum cortisol:cortisone ratio in the postoperative acute-phase response. Horm Res 59:293 – 296

32. Dotsch J, Dorr HG, Stalla GK, Sippell WG (2001) Effect of glucocorticoid excess on the corti- sol/cortisone ratio. Steroids 66:817 – 820

33. Cooper MS, Bujalska I, Rabbitt E, et al (2001) Modulation of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydro- genase isozymes by proinflammatory cytokines in osteoblasts: an autocrine switch from glu- cocorticoid inactivation to activation. J Bone Miner Res 16:1037 – 1044

34. Heiniger CD, Rochat MK, Frey FJ, Frey BM (2001) TNF-alpha enhances intracellular gluco- corticoid availability. FEBS Lett 507:351 – 356

35. Cai TQ, Wong B, Mundt SS, Thieringer R, Wright SD, Hermanowski-Vosatka A (2001) Induc- tion of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 but not -2 in human aortic smooth mus- cle cells by inflammatory stimuli. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 77:117 – 122

36. Suzuki S, Tsubochi H, Ishibashi H, et al (2005) Inflammatory mediators down-regulate 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 in a human lung epithelial cell line BEAS-2B and the rat lung. Tohoku J Exp Med 207:293 – 301

37. Tomlinson JW, Moore J, Cooper MS, et al (2001) Regulation of expression of 11beta-hydroxy- steroid dehydrogenase type 1 in adipose tissue: tissue-specific induction by cytokines. Endo- crinology 142:1982 – 1989

38. Tomlinson JW, Walker EA, Bujalska IJ, et al (2004) 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific regulator of glucocorticoid response. Endocr Rev 25:831 – 866 39. Hewitt KN, Walker EA, Stewart PM. (2005) Minireview: hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase

and redox control of 11{beta}-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity. Endocrinology 146:2539 – 2543

40. Victor VM, Rocha M, De la Fuente M (2004) Immune cells: free radicals and antioxidants in sepsis. Int Immunopharmacol 4:327 – 347

41. Ritter C, Andrades M, Guerreiro M, et al (2003) Plasma oxidative parameters and mortality in patients with severe burn injury. Intensive Care Med 29:1380 – 1383

42. Su X, Vicker N, Ganeshapillai D, et al (2006) Benzothiazole derivatives as novel inhibitors of human 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. Mol Cell Endocrinol 248:214 – 217

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Preconditioned finite element method: the Poisson problem on the square Consider the Poisson problem on Ω = [0, 1] × [0, 1]... Now let us compute the eigenvalues of A (we already

In order to study the ash dispersion, the output quan- tities are the statistical parameters that permits to reconstruct the parcels distribution in every cell (i.e. the mean

• Every time you create an object of one class, one instance of a complete object is created with its own member fields. class MyClass {

Lipari (Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna) OOSD September 29, 2010 4 /

[r]

analogously BB ′ and CC ′ are the bisectors of the angles ∠ABC

Doney, One-sided Local Large Deviation and Renewal Theorems in the Case of Infinite Mean, Probab. Erickson, Strong renewal theorems with infinite

Thanks to the strong convergence in L 2 0; T ; L 2 (D) one can pass to the limit and prove that u is a solution (this step depends on the sequence of approximating problems and thus