• Non ci sono risultati.

Engineering Cost Models for Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms: Towards the Integrated Design of Turbines and Farm Layout for Minimum LCoE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Engineering Cost Models for Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms: Towards the Integrated Design of Turbines and Farm Layout for Minimum LCoE"

Copied!
3
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Supported by SciSerTec Web: http://www.scisertec.de

Abstract No.

Engineering Cost Models for Onshore and Offshore Wind Farms: Towards the Integrated

Design of Turbines and Farm Layout for Minimum LCoE

Alessandro Croce1, Maryi Xiolesmy Alfonso Rodriguez1, Luca Sartori1, Stefano Cacciola1, and Kutay Yimazlar1

1Politecnico di Milano

The focus of wind energy system optimization is progressively moving from the single machine to the wind farm level. The most striking example of this fact is represented by the wind farm control. In fact, it was demonstrated that a turbine controller aimed at maximizing the production of a single machine does not necessarily imply to the maximum power of the entire farm [1]. Clearly, the very same argument can be applied also to different disciplines, such as turbine design, operations and maintenance (O&M), decommission and repowering.

In the wider context of a farm, each of the aforementioned factors has a mutual impact on the others and all contribute to the final Levelized Cost of Energy (LCoE) of the system. Consequently, the design of a farm and turbines associated to the minimum LCoE should consider all mutual interactions among all factors.

This fact becomes even more important for offshore, possibly floating, farms than for the onshore counterpart, where the layouts, as well as other design parameters, are constrained by the terrain orography. Indeed, floating offshore farms allow a higher number of degrees of freedom (e.g., maximum farm extension, spacing, typology of the floater, number of turbines, etc...) to be exploited in a suitable optimization procedure.

This discussion suggests that, on the top of any technological improvement, LCoE of offshore and onshore wind energy systems can be minimized through an integrated design of the farm which includes along with layout, also turbine types and controls, in a large optimization problem. To persecute this goal, the fist step is to develop a wind farm cost model, to assist and drive the multidisciplinary design optimization of turbines and farms.

The present abstract deals with the on-going development of such a farm cost model. At the current status of the research, the tool is organized in four modules. In the first, the annual energy

production (AEP) is computed given wind speed statistics through simulations of the farm flow with Floris [2]. In a second, the CAPEX is computed considering the balance of plant, the floater (or foundations) and the electrical connections. The third and fourth modules implement engineering models for O&M and decommission, respectively. This tool will be included in our Cp-Max design code [3].

For the sake of brevity, in this abstract, to demonstrate the potentiality of this tool, the sensitivity of LCoE with respect to the power density, defined as the ratio between the installed power and the total farm area, is considered. Different values of power density have been obtained changing the spacing among the turbines.

From Fig. 1, it appears that, as the density decreases, the AEP increases due to the lower wake loss (green curve). However, due to the increase in the electrical connection costs, there is an increase in LCoE at low densities, leading to a minimum LCoE at about 7 MW/km^2 in both on-shore and off-shore cases (yellow and red curves). That minimum is connected to the optimal turbine spacing for the selected scenario.

(2)

Supported by SciSerTec Web: http://www.scisertec.de

analysis will be presented. Acknowledgement:

The work was partly supported by the FLOAWER project, which received funding from the European Union’s H2020 research and innovation program under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement N° 860879.

(3)

Supported by SciSerTec Web: http://www.scisertec.de

Keywords: ”Wind Farm Cost Model” ”Design Tools ” ”Wind Farm Layout Optimization Tools ”

Images:

Link: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/static.vcongress.de/cms/forwind/paper/fd822e29-4693-4f67-b300-064e027d8534.png

Description: Figure 1: Effect of power density on AEP (green curve), LCoE for onshore (yellow curve) and LCoE for offshore (red curve).

References:

[1] Fleming, P. and Annoni, J. and Shah, J. J. and Wang, L. and Ananthan, S. and Zhang, Z. and Hutchings, K. and Wang, P. and Chen, W. and Chen, L. (2017). Field test of wake steering at an offshore wind farm. Wind Energy Science, 2, 229-239. Available at: https://wes.copernicus.org/articles/2/229/2017/.

[2] FLORIS. Version 2.2.0 (2020). Available at https://github.com/NREL/floris

[3] Croce, A., Cacciola, S., Sartori, L., and De Fidelibus, P.: Evaluation of the impact of wind farm control techniques on fatigue and ultimate loads, Wind Energ. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/wes-2019-103, in review, 2020.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

I monitoraggi effettuati nel corso della stagione 2019 hanno interessato 32 aziende viticole nelle quali erano presenti anche 17 parcelle non trattate.. Per quanto riguarda

Obiettivo del progetto era aiutare i docenti della Facoltà ad utilizzare Moodle, distinguendo tra chi aveva nessuna o poche conoscenze e chi invece aveva già iniziato ad

The authors observed that the combination of the programs does not show better results than the PATH pro- gram alone, while when compared to the control group both show efficacy

e di Batthyany.a Quest'ultimo, ministro degli afrari esteri del governo ungherese, vista la nuova situazione e vincendo in qual-. che modo la precedente filuttanza a

There was no significant difference in the prevalence of use of β-blockers, ACEIs, ARBs, CCBs, diuretics and α1 adrenoceptor blockers in pa- tients with or without this syndrome

Cela pose le problème d’accepter un discours métaphysique – qui est présent dans la théorie de la formativité comme « métaphysique de la figuration » – vers lequel, au

Nevertheless, from the analysis of the values reported by the reference points P1-P9, it seems that only the presence of the offshore wind farm (the CS1 scenario) may influence

In addition, the power generation is obtained considering the specific behavior of the FOWT and compared to a bottom-fixed offshore wind turbine (BOWT).. The FOWT studied is the