• Non ci sono risultati.

The Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, or persons acting on its behalf, are not responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "The Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, or persons acting on its behalf, are not responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report. "

Copied!
610
0
0

Testo completo

(1)
(2)
(3)

Legal Disclaimer

The Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA), together with the 21 Regional Agencies (ARPA) and Provincial Agencies (APPA) for the protection of the environment, as of 14 January 2017 is part of the National Network System for the Protection of the Environment (SNPA), established by the Law June 28, 2016, n.132.

The Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, or persons acting on its behalf, are not responsible for the use that may be made of the information contained in this report.

ISPRA - Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale Via Vitaliano Brancati, 48 – 00144 Roma

www.isprambiente.gov.it ISPRA, Rapporti 318/20 ISBN 978-88-448-0993-5

Extracts from this document may be reproduced on the condition that the source is acknowledged

Graphic design:

Cover design: Franco Iozzoli

Cover image: Typus Orbis Terrarum; Ortelius A., Hogenburgus F., Hogenberg F., 1573. National Maritime Museum, Greenwich, London

ISPRA – Communications Area

Coordination of the online publication:

Daria Mazzella

ISPRA – Communications Area

April, 2020

(4)

Annual Report for submission under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol

Authors

Daniela Romano, Chiara Arcarese, Antonella Bernetti, Antonio Caputo, Mario Contaldi, Marco Cordella, Riccardo De Lauretis, Eleonora Di Cristofaro, Andrea Gagna, Barbara Gonella, Federica Moricci, Ernesto Taurino, Marina Vitullo

With contributions from

Maria Vincenza Chiriacò, Riccardo Liburdi, Guido Pellis, Lucia Perugini

PART I: ANNUAL INVENTORY SUBMISSION I NTRODUCTION

Daniela Romano Riccardo De Lauretis Marina Vitullo (§1.2.2) Chiara Arcarese (§1.2.3)

T RENDS IN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS

Daniela Romano Marina Vitullo E NERGY

Riccardo De Lauretis Ernesto Taurino

Daniela Romano (§3.5.1, §3.5.4) Antonella Bernetti (§3.5) Antonio Caputo (§3.9) Marco Cordella (§3.5, §3.6)

I NDUSTRIAL P ROCESSES AND P RODUCT U SE

Andrea Gagna Barbara Gonella Ernesto Taurino

Federica Moricci (§4.4, §4.6, §4.7) Daniela Romano (§4.5, §4.8) A GRICULTURE

Eleonora Di Cristofaro Marco Cordella (§5.3)

L AND USE , L AND USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY

Marina Vitullo

Guido Pellis (§6.3, §6.4) W ASTE

Barbara Gonella Ernesto Taurino

R ECALCULATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS

Daniela Romano

PART II: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 7, PARAGRAPH 1 KP-LULUCF

Marina Vitullo

(5)

Maria Vincenza Chiriacò, Guido Pellis, Lucia Perugini (§9.5.3) I NFORMATION ON ACCOUNTING OF K YOTO UNITS

Chiara Arcarese Marina Vitullo

I NFORMATION ON MINIMIZATION OF ADVERSE IMPACTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A RTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH

14

Antonio Caputo A NNEXES

K EY CATEGORIES AND UNCERTAINTY Daniela Romano

Antonio Caputo Marina Vitullo

ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR POWER GENERATION

Mario Contaldi Riccardo De Lauretis Ernesto Taurino

E STIMATION OF CARBON CONTENT OF COALS USED IN INDUSTRY

Ernesto Taurino

CO 2 REFERENCE APPROACH Ernesto Taurino

Riccardo De Lauretis

N ATIONAL EMISSION FACTORS

Antonio Caputo Riccardo De Lauretis Ernesto Taurino

A GRICULTURE SECTOR

Eleonora Di Cristofaro

T HE N ATIONAL R EGISTRY FOR F OREST C ARBON S INKS

Marina Vitullo

T HE N ATIONAL R EGISTRY

Chiara Arcarese Riccardo Liburdi

Contact: Riccardo De Lauretis

Telephone +39 0650072543

Fax +39 0650072657

E-mail riccardo.delauretis@isprambiente.it

ISPRA- Institute for Environmental Protection and Research Environmental Assessment, Control and Sustainability Department Emissions, Prevention of Atmospheric Impacts and Climate Change Area Air Emission Inventory Unit

Via V. Brancati, 48 00144 Rome – Italy

Text available on ISPRA website at www.isprambiente.gov.it

(6)

PREMESSA

Nell’ambito degli strumenti e delle politiche per fronteggiare i cambiamenti climatici, un ruolo fondamentale è svolto dal monitoraggio delle emissioni dei gas-serra.

A garantire la predisposizione e l’aggiornamento annuale dell’inventario dei gas-serra secondo i formati richiesti, in Italia, è l’ISPRA su incarico del Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare, attraverso le indicazioni del Decreto Legislativo n. 51 del 7 marzo 2008 e, più di recente, del Decreto Legislativo n. 30 del 13 marzo 2013, che prevedono l’istituzione di un Sistema Nazionale, National System, relativo all’inventario delle emissioni dei gas-serra.

In più, come è previsto dalla Convenzione-quadro sui cambiamenti climatici per tutti i Paesi industrializzati, l’ISPRA documenta in uno specifico rapporto, il National Inventory Report, le metodologie di stima utilizzate, unitamente ad una spiegazione degli andamenti osservati.

Il National Inventory Report facilita i processi internazionali di verifica cui le stime ufficiali di emissione dei gas serra sono sottoposte. In particolare, viene esaminata la rispondenza alle proprietà di trasparenza, consistenza, comparabilità, completezza e accuratezza nella realizzazione, qualità richieste esplicitamente dalla Convenzione suddetta. L’inventario delle emissioni è sottoposto ogni anno ad un esame (review) da parte di un organismo nominato dal Segretariato della Convenzione che analizza tutto il materiale presentato dal Paese e ne verifica in dettaglio le qualità su enunciate. Senza tali requisiti, l’Italia sarebbe esclusa dalla partecipazione ai meccanismi flessibili previsti dallo stesso Protocollo, come il mercato delle quote di emissioni, l’implementazione di progetti con i Paesi in via di sviluppo (CDM) e l’implementazione di progetti congiunti con i Paesi a economia in transizione (JI).

Il presente documento rappresenta, inoltre, un riferimento fondamentale per la pianificazione e l’attuazione di tutte le politiche ambientali da parte delle istituzioni centrali e periferiche. Accanto all’inventario dei gas- serra, l’ISPRA realizza ogni anno l’inventario nazionale delle emissioni in atmosfera, richiesto dalla Convenzione di Ginevra sull’inquinamento atmosferico transfrontaliero (UNECE-CLRTAP) e dalle Direttive europee sulla limitazione delle emissioni. In più, tutto il territorio nazionale è attualmente coperto da inventari regionali sostanzialmente coerenti con l’inventario nazionale, realizzati principalmente dalle Agenzie Regionali e Provinciali per la Protezione dell’Ambiente.

Nonostante i progressi compiuti, l’attività di preparazione degli inventari affronta continuamente nuove sfide

legate alla necessità di considerare nuove sorgenti e nuovi inquinanti e di armonizzare gli inventari prodotti

per diverse finalità di policy. Il contesto internazionale al quale fa riferimento la preparazione dell’inventario

nazionale costituisce una garanzia di qualità dei dati, per l’autorevolezza dei riferimenti metodologici,

l’efficacia del processo internazionale di review e la flessibilità nell’adattamento alle nuove circostanze.

(7)
(8)

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16

SOMMARIO (ITALIAN) 22

1. INTRODUCTION 24

1.1 Background information on greenhouse gas inventories and climate change 24 1.2 Description of the institutional arrangement for inventory preparation 26

1.2.1 National Inventory System 26

1.2.2 Institutional arrangement for reporting under Article 3, paragraphs 3 and 4 of Kyoto

Protocol 29

1.2.3 National Registry System 29

1.3 Brief description of the process of inventory preparation 31

1.4 Brief general description of methodologies and data sources used 32

1.5 Brief description of key categories 36

1.6 Information on the QA/QC plan including verification and treatment of confidentiality issues

where relevant 41

1.7 General uncertainty evaluation, including data on the overall uncertainty for the inventory

totals 45

1.8 General assessment of the completeness 47

2 TRENDS IN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 49

2.1 Description and interpretation of emission trends for aggregate greenhouse gas emissions 49

2.2 Description and interpretation of emission trends by gas 50

2.2.1 Carbon dioxide emissions 50

2.2.2 Methane emissions 51

2.2.3 Nitrous oxide emissions 52

2.2.4 Fluorinated gas emissions 53

2.3 Description and interpretation of emission trends by source 55

2.3.1 Energy 55

2.3.2 Industrial processes and product use 56

2.3.3 Agriculture 58

2.3.4 LULUCF 59

2.3.5 Waste 60

2.4 Description and interpretation of emission trends for indirect greenhouse gases and SO 2 61

2.5 Indirect CO 2 and nitrous oxide emissions 62

3 ENERGY [CRF SECTOR 1] 63

3.1 Sector overview 63

3.2 Methodology description 69

3.3 Energy industries 72

3.3.1 Public Electricity and Heat Production 72

3.3.1.1 Source category description 72

3.3.1.2 Methodological issues 73

3.3.2 Refineries 74

3.3.2.1 Source category description 74

3.3.2.2 Methodological issues 74

3.3.2.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 75

3.3.2.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 76

3.3.2.5 Source-specific recalculations 76

3.3.2.6 Source-specific planned improvements 76

3.3.3 Manufacture of Solid Fuels and Other Energy Industries 76

3.3.3.1 Source category description 76

3.3.3.2 Methodological issues 77

3.3.3.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 77

3.3.3.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 78

3.3.3.5 Source-specific recalculations 78

(9)

3.3.3.6 Source-specific planned improvements 78

3.4 Manufacturing industries and construction 78

3.4.1 Sector overview 78

3.4.2 Source category description 80

3.4.3 Methodological issues 82

3.4.4 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 85

3.4.5 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 86

3.4.6 Source-specific recalculations 87

3.4.7 Source-specific planned improvements 87

3.5 Transport 87

3.5.1 Aviation 88

3.5.1.1 Source category description 88

3.5.1.2 Methodological issues 88

3.5.1.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 91

3.5.1.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 91

3.5.1.5 Source-specific recalculations 92

3.5.1.6 Source-specific planned improvements 92

3.5.2 Railways 92

3.5.3 Road Transport 93

3.5.3.1 Source category description 93

3.5.3.1 Methodological issues 93

3.5.3.1.1 Fuel-based emissions 94

3.5.3.2.1.a The fuel balance process 96

3.5.3.1.2 Traffic-based emissions 97

3.5.3.2 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 102

3.5.3.3 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 102

3.5.3.4 Source-specific recalculations 103

3.5.3.5 Source-specific planned improvements 105

3.5.4 Navigation 105

3.5.4.1 Source category description 105

3.5.4.2 Methodological issues 105

3.5.4.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 107

3.5.4.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 107

3.5.4.5 Source-specific recalculations 108

3.5.4.6 Source-specific planned improvements 108

3.5.5 Other transportation 108

3.5.5.1 Source category description 108

3.5.5.2 Methodological issues 108

3.5.5.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 108

3.5.5.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 109

3.5.5.5 Source-specific recalculations 109

3.5.5.6 Source-specific planned improvements 109

3.6 Other sectors 109

3.6.1 Sector overview 109

3.6.2 Source category description 110

3.6.3 Methodological issues 111

3.6.4 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 114

3.6.5 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 115

3.6.6 Source-specific recalculations 115

3.6.7 Source-specific planned improvements 115

3.7 International bunkers 115

3.8 Feedstock and non-energy use of fuels 116

3.8.1 Source category description 116

3.8.2 Methodological issues 116

3.8.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 118

3.8.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 118

3.8.5 Source-specific recalculations 118

3.8.6 Source-specific planned improvements 118

(10)

3.9 Fugitive emissions from solid fuels, oil and natural gas 118

3.9.1 Source category description 118

3.9.2 Methodological issues 119

3.9.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 124

3.9.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 125

3.9.5 Source-specific recalculations 125

3.9.6 Source-specific planned improvements 125

4 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE [CRF SECTOR 2] 126

4.1 Sector overview 126

4.2 Mineral Products (2A) 128

4.2.1 Source category description 128

4.2.2 Methodological issues 130

4.2.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 135

4.2.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 136

4.2.5 Source-specific recalculations 136

4.2.6 Source-specific planned improvements 136

4.3 Chemical industry (2B) 136

4.3.1 Source category description 136

4.3.2 Methodological issues 139

4.3.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 145

4.3.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 147

4.3.5 Source-specific recalculations 148

4.3.6 Source-specific planned improvements 148

4.4 Metal production (2C) 148

4.4.1 Source category description 148

4.4.2 Methodological issues 150

4.4.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 155

4.4.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 158

4.4.5 Source-specific recalculations 158

4.4.6 Source-specific planned improvements 158

4.5 Non-energy products from fuels and solvent use (2D) 158

4.5.1 Source category description 158

4.5.2 Methodological issues 159

4.5.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 161

4.5.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 162

4.5.5 Source-specific recalculations 162

4.5.6 Source-specific planned improvements 163

4.6 Electronics Industry Emissions (2E) 163

4.6.1 Source category description 163

4.6.2 Methodological issues 163

4.6.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 165

4.6.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 165

4.6.5 Source-specific recalculations 165

4.6.6 Source-specific planned improvements 165

4.7 Emissions of fluorinated substitutes for ozone depleting substances (2F) 166

4.7.1 Source category description 166

4.7.2 Methodological issues 166

4.7.2.1 Emissions from Stationary Air Conditioning sector (2.F.1.f) 167 4.7.2.2 Emissions from Refrigeration sector: commercial (2.F.1.a), domestic (2.F.1.b), and

industrial (2.F.1.c) 182

4.7.2.3 Emissions from Mobile Air Conditioning (2.F.1.e), Foam blowing Agents (2.F.2),

Fire Protection (2.F.3) and Aerosols (2.F.4) 189

4.7.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 192

4.7.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 193

4.7.5 Source-specific recalculations 194

4.7.6 Source-specific planned improvements 195

4.8 Other product manufacture and use (2G) 197

(11)

4.8.1 Source category description 197

4.8.2 Methodological issues 197

4.8.3 Uncertainty and time series consistency 201

4.8.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 201

4.8.5 Source-specific recalculation 202

4.8.6 Source-specific planned improvements 202

4.9 Other production (2H) 202

4.9.1 Source category description 202

5 AGRICULTURE [CRF SECTOR 3] 203

5.1 Sector overview 203

5.1.1 Emission trends 203

5.1.2 Key categories 205

5.1.3 Activities 205

5.1.4 Agricultural statistics 206

5.2 Enteric fermentation (3A) 207

5.2.1 Source category description 207

5.2.2 Methodological issues 207

5.2.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 213

5.2.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 213

5.2.5 Source-specific recalculations 214

5.2.6 Source-specific planned improvements 214

5.3 Manure management (3B) 214

5.3.1 Source category description 214

5.3.2 Methodological issues 215

5.3.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 226

5.3.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 227

5.3.5 Source-specific recalculations 227

5.3.6 Source-specific planned improvements 228

5.4 Rice cultivation (3C) 230

5.4.1 Source category description 230

5.4.2 Methodological issues 230

5.4.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 232

5.4.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 233

5.4.5 Source-specific recalculations 233

5.4.6 Source-specific planned improvements 233

5.5 Agriculture soils (3D) 234

5.5.1 Source category description 234

5.5.2 Methodological issues 235

5.5.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 240

5.5.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 241

5.5.5 Source-specific recalculations 242

5.5.6 Source-specific planned improvements 243

5.6 Field burning of agriculture residues (3F) 243

5.6.1 Source category description 243

5.6.2 Methodological issues 243

5.6.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 246

5.6.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 246

5.6.5 Source-specific recalculations 246

5.6.6 Source-specific planned improvements 246

5.7 Liming (3G) 247

5.7.1 Source category description 247

5.7.2 Methodological issues 247

5.7.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 247

5.7.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 248

5.7.5 Source-specific recalculations 248

5.7.6 Source-specific planned improvements 248

5.8 Urea application (3H) 248

(12)

5.8.1 Source category description 248

5.8.2 Methodological issues 248

5.8.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 248

5.8.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 249

5.8.5 Source-specific recalculations 249

5.8.6 Source-specific planned improvements 249

6 LAND USE, LAND USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY [CRF SECTOR 4] 250

6.1 Sector overview 250

6.2 Forest Land (4A) 257

6.2.1 Description 257

6.2.2 Information on approaches used for representing land areas and on land-use databases

used for the inventory preparation 258

6.2.3 Land-use definitions and the classification systems used and their correspondence to the

LULUCF categories 258

6.2.4 Methodological issues 259

6.2.5 Uncertainty and time series consistency 262

6.2.6 Category-specific QA/QC and verification 264

6.2.7 Category-specific recalculations 266

6.2.8 Category-specific planned improvements 266

6.3 Cropland (4B) 267

6.3.1 Description 267

6.3.2 Information on approaches used for representing land areas and on land-use databases

used for the inventory preparation 267

6.3.3 Land-use definitions and the classification systems used and their correspondence to the

LULUCF categories 267

6.3.4 Methodological issues 267

6.3.5 Uncertainty and time series consistency 273

6.3.6 Category-specific QA/QC and verification 273

6.3.7 Category-specific recalculations 273

6.3.8 Category-specific planned improvements 274

6.4 Grassland (4C) 274

6.4.1 Description 274

6.4.2 Information on approaches used for representing land areas and on land-use databases

used for the inventory preparation 274

6.4.3 Land-use definitions and the classification systems used and their correspondence to the

LULUCF categories 274

6.4.4 Methodological issues 275

6.4.5 Uncertainty and time series consistency 280

6.4.6 Category-specific QA/QC and verification 280

6.4.7 Category-specific recalculations 281

6.4.8 Category-specific planned improvements 281

6.5 Wetlands (4D) 281

6.5.1 Description 281

6.5.2 Information on approaches used for representing land areas and on land-use databases

used for the inventory preparation 282

6.5.3 Land-use definitions and the classification systems used and their correspondence to the

LULUCF categories 282

6.5.4 Methodological issues 282

6.5.5 Uncertainty and time series consistency 283

6.5.6 Category-specific recalculations 284

6.5.7 Category-specific planned improvements 284

6.6 Settlements (4E) 284

6.6.1 Description 284

6.6.2 Information on approaches used for representing land areas and on land-use databases

used for the inventory preparation 284

6.6.3 Land-use definitions and the classification systems used and their correspondence to the

LULUCF categories 284

(13)

6.6.4 Methodological issues 284

6.6.5 Uncertainty and time series consistency 287

6.6.6 Category-specific QA/QC and verification 288

6.6.7 Category-specific recalculations 288

6.6.8 Category -specific planned improvements 288

6.7 Other Land (4F) 288

6.8 Direct N 2 O emissions from N inputs to managed soils (4(I)) 288 6.9 Emissions and removals from drainage and rewetting and other management of organic and

mineral soils (4(II)) 288

6.10 N 2 O emissions from N mineralization/immobilization associated with loss/gain of soil organic matter resulting from change of land use or management of mineral soils 289

6.10.1 Description 289

6.10.2 Methodological issues 289

6.10.3 Category-specific recalculations 290

6.11 Indirect N 2 O emissions from managed soils (4(IV)) 290

6.11.1 Description 290

6.11.2 Methodological issues 291

6.11.3 Category-specific recalculations 291

6.12 Biomass Burning (4(V)) 291

6.12.1 Description 292

6.12.2 Methodological issues 292

6.12.3 Uncertainty and time series consistency 295

6.12.4 Category-specific QA/QC and verification 295

6.12.5 Category-specific recalculations 295

6.12.6 Category-specific planned improvements 296

6.13 Harvested wood products (HWP) (4G) 296

6.13.1 Description 296

6.13.2 Methodological issues 296

6.13.3 Uncertainty and time series consistency 297

6.13.4 Category-specific QA/QC and verification 297

6.13.5 Category-specific recalculations 297

6.13.6 Category-specific planned improvements 297

7 WASTE [CRF SECTOR 5] 298

7.1 Sector overview 298

7.2 Solid waste disposal on land (5A) 299

7.2.1 Source category description 299

7.2.2 Methodological issues 300

7.2.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 310

7.2.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 310

7.2.5 Source-specific recalculations 311

7.2.6 Source-specific planned improvements 312

7.3 Biological treatment of solid waste (5B) 312

7.3.1 Source category description 312

7.3.2 Methodological issues 312

7.3.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 314

7.3.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 314

7.3.5 Source-specific recalculations 314

7.3.6 Source-specific planned improvements 314

7.4 Waste incineration (5C) 315

7.4.1 Source category description 315

7.4.2 Methodological issues 315

7.4.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 320

7.4.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 321

7.4.5 Source-specific recalculations 321

7.4.6 Source-specific planned improvements 321

7.5 Wastewater handling (5D) 321

7.5.1 Source category description 321

(14)

7.5.2 Methodological issues 323

7.5.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 328

7.5.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 329

7.5.5 Source-specific recalculations 330

7.5.6 Source-specific planned improvements 330

8 RECALCULATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS 331

8.1 Explanations and justifications for recalculations 331

8.2 Implications for emission levels 331

8.3 Implications for emission trends, including time series consistency 335 8.4 Recalculations, response to the review process and planned improvements 336

8.4.1 Recalculations 336

8.4.2 Response to the UNFCCC review process 337

8.4.3 Planned improvements (e.g., institutional arrangements, inventory preparation) 338

9 KP-LULUCF 341

9.1 General information 341

9.1.1 Definition of forest and any other criteria 341

9.1.2 Elected activities under Article 3, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol 341 9.1.3 Description of how the definitions of each activity under Article 3.3 and FM and each

elected activity under Article 3.4 have been implemented and applied consistently over

time 341

9.1.4 Description of precedence conditions and/or hierarchy among Article 3.4 activities, and how they have been consistently applied in determining how land was classified 342

9.2 Land-related information 342

9.2.1 Spatial assessment unit used for determining the area of the units of land under Article

3.3 344

9.2.2 Methodology used to develop the land transition matrix 344 9.2.3 Maps and/or database to identify the geographical locations, and the system of

identification codes for the geographical locations 345

9.3 Activity-specific information 345

9.3.1 Methods for carbon stock change and GHG emission and removal estimates 345 9.3.1.1 Description of the methodologies and the underlying assumptions used 345 9.3.1.2 Justification when omitting any carbon pool or GHG emissions/removals from

activities under Article 3.3 and elected activities under Article 3.4 347 9.3.1.3 Information on whether or not indirect and natural GHG emissions and removals

have been factored out 351

9.3.1.4 Changes in data and methods since the previous submission (recalculations) 351

9.3.1.5 Uncertainty estimates 352

9.3.1.6 Information on other methodological issues 353

9.3.1.7 The year of the onset of an activity, if after 2008 353

9.4 Article 3.3 354

9.4.1 Information that demonstrates that activities under Article 3.3 began on or after 1 January 1990 and before 31 December 2012 and are direct human-induced 354 9.4.2 Information on how harvesting or forest disturbance that is followed by the re-

establishment of forest is distinguished from deforestation 355 9.4.3 Information on the size and geographical location of forest areas that have lost forest

cover, but which are not yet classified as deforested 355 9.4.4 Information related to the natural disturbances provision under article 3.3 355 9.4.5 Information on Harvested Wood Products under article 3.3 356

9.5 Article 3.4 357

9.5.1 Information that demonstrates that activities under Article 3.4 have occurred since 1

January 1990 and are human induced 357

9.5.2 Information relating to Forest Management 357

9.5.2.1 Conversion of natural forest to planted forest 357

9.5.2.2 Forest Management Reference Level (FMRL) 358

9.5.2.3 Technical Corrections of FMRL 358

9.5.2.4 Information related to the natural disturbances provision under article 3.4 359

(15)

9.5.2.5 Information on Harvested Wood Products under article 3.4 360 9.5.3 Information relating to Cropland Management, Grazing Land Management,

Revegetation and Wetland Drainage and Rewetting if elected, for the base year 360

9.6 Other information 361

9.6.1 Key category analysis for Article 3.3 activities and any elected activities under Article 3.4 361

9.7 Information relating to Article 6 361

10 INFORMATION ON ACCOUNTING OF KYOTO UNITS 362

10.1 Background information 362

10.2 Summary of information reported in the SEF tables 362

10.3 Discrepancies and notifications 362

10.4 Publicly accessible information 363

10.5 Calculation of the commitment period reserve (CPR) 363

10.6 KP-LULUCF accounting 363

11 INFORMATION ON CHANGES IN NATIONAL SYSTEM 365

12 INFORMATION ON CHANGES IN NATIONAL REGISTRY 366

12.1 Previous Review Recommendations 366

12.2 Changes to National Registry 366

13 INFORMATION ON MINIMIZATION OF ADVERSE IMPACTS IN ACCORDANCE

WITH ARTICLE 3, PARAGRAPH 14 368

13.1 Overview 368

13.2 European Commitment under Art 3.14 of the Kyoto Protocol 369

13.3 Italian commitment under Art 3.14 of the Kyoto Protocol 370

13.4 Funding, strengthening capacity and transfer of technology 374

13.5 Priority actions in implementing commitments under Article 3 paragraph 14 376 13.6 Additional information and future activities related to the commitment of Article 3.14 of the

Kyoto Protocol 378

13.7 Review process of Article 3.14 of the Kyoto Protocol 378

14 REFERENCES 379

14.1 INTRODUCTION and TRENDS IN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 379

14.2 ENERGY 380

14.3 INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES AND PRODUCT USE 383

14.4 AGRICULTURE 389

14.5 LAND USE, LAND USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY 399

14.6 WASTE 402

14.7 KP-LULUCF 407

14.8 Information on minimization of adverse impacts in accordance with Article 3, paragraph 14 408

14.9 ANNEX 2 412

14.10 ANNEX 3 412

14.11 ANNEX 4 412

14.12 ANNEX 5 413

14.13 ANNEX 6 413

14.14 ANNEX 7 414

14.15 ANNEX 14 415

ANNEX 1: KEY CATEGORIES AND UNCERTAINTY 416

A1.1 Introduction 416

A1.2 Approach 1 key category assessment 416

A1.3 Uncertainty assessment (IPCC Approach 1) 423

A1.4 Approach 2 key category assessment 434

A1.5 Uncertainty assessment (IPCC Approach 2) 441

ANNEX 2: ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR POWER GENERATION 456

A2.1 Source category description 456

A2.2 Methodological issues 457

(16)

A2.3 Uncertainty and time-series consistency 459

A2.4 Source-specific QA/QC and verification 460

A2.5 Source-specific recalculations 460

A2.6 Source-specific planned improvements 460

ANNEX 3: ESTIMATION OF CARBON CONTENT OF COALS USED IN INDUSTRY 462

ANNEX 4: CO 2 REFERENCE APPROACH 466

A4.1 Introduction 466

A4.2 Comparison of the sectoral approach with the reference approach 467 A4.3 Comparison of the sectoral approach with the reference approach and international statistics 468

ANNEX 5: NATIONAL ENERGY BALANCE, YEAR 2018 470

ANNEX 6: NATIONAL EMISSION FACTORS 475

A6.1 Natural gas 475

A6.2 Diesel oil, petrol and LPG 477

A6.3 Fuel oil 478

A6.4 Coal 478

A6.5 Other fuels 480

ANNEX 7: AGRICULTURE SECTOR 486

A7.1 Enteric fermentation (3A) 486

A7.2 Manure management (3B) 491

A7.3 Agricultural soils (3D) 505

ANNEX 8: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE CONSIDERED AS PART OF THE ANNUAL INVENTORY SUBMISSION AND THE SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION REQUIRED UNDER ARTICLE 7, PARAGRAPH 1, OF THE KYOTO PROTOCOL OR OTHER USEFUL REFERENCE INFORMATION 516

A8.1 Annual inventory submission 516

A8.2 Supplementary information under Article 7, paragraph 1 527

A8.2.1 KP-LULUCF 527

A8.2.2 Standard electronic format 537

A8.2.3 National registry 548

A8.2.4 Adverse impacts under Article 3, paragraph 14 of the Kyoto Protocol 549 ANNEX 9: METHODOLOGIES, DATA SOURCES AND EMISSION FACTORS 557 ANNEX 10: THE NATIONAL REGISTRY FOR CARBON SINKS 569

ANNEX 11: THE NATIONAL REGISTRY 582

ANNEX 12: OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT SUBMISSION IMPROVEMENTS 585

A12.1 Results of the UNFCCC review process 585

A12.2 Results of the ESD technical review process 595

ANNEX 13: REPORTING UNDER EU REGULATION NO 525/2013 596

A13.1 Article 10 of the EU Regulation 596

A13.2 Article 12 of the EU Regulation 599

ANNEX 14: FOR-EST MODEL 601

(17)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

ES.1. Background information on greenhouse gas inventories and climate change

The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (FCCC) was ratified by Italy in the year 1994 through law no.65 of 15/01/1994.

The Kyoto Protocol, adopted in December 1997, has established emission reduction objectives for Annex B Parties (i.e. industrialised countries and countries with economy in transition): in particular, the European Union as a whole is committed to an 8% reduction within the period 2008-2012, in comparison with base year levels. For Italy, the EU burden sharing agreement, set out in Annex II to Decision 2002/358/EC and in accordance with Article 4 of the Kyoto Protocol, has established a reduction objective of 6.5% in the commitment period, in comparison with 1990 levels.

Subsequently, on 1 st June 2002, Italy ratified the Kyoto Protocol through law no.120 of 01/06/2002. The ratification law prescribed also the preparation of a National Action Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which was adopted by the Interministerial Committee for Economic Planning (CIPE) on 19 th December 2002 (deliberation n. 123 of 19/12/2002). The Kyoto Protocol finally entered into force in February 2005. The first commitment period ended in 2012, with an extension, for fulfilling commitments, to 18 th November 2015, the so called true-up period. The evaluation of the Kyoto Protocol, together with the commitments fulfilled by each Party, has been finalized by the UNFCCC Secretariat.

A new global agreement was reached in Paris in December 2015, for the period after 2020. The agreement aims to strengthen the global response to the threat of climate change by holding the increase in the global temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impact of climate change. On 5 th October 2016, the threshold for entry into force of the Paris Agreement was achieved and the Paris Agreement entered into force on 4 th November 2016.

To fulfil the gap 2013-2020, the ‘Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol’ was adopted on 8 th December 2012.

The EU and its Member States have committed to this second phase of the Kyoto Protocol and established to reduce their collective emissions to 20% below their levels in 1990 or other chosen base years; this is also reflected in the Doha Amendment . The target will be fulfilled jointly with Iceland.

As a Party to the Convention and the Kyoto Protocol, Italy is committed to develop, publish and regularly update national emission inventories of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as well as formulate and implement programmes to reduce these emissions.

In order to establish compliance with national and international commitments, the national GHG emission inventory is compiled and communicated annually by the Institute for Environmental Protection and Research (ISPRA) to the competent institutions, after endorsement by the Ministry for the Environment, Land and Sea. The submission is carried out through compilation of the Common Reporting Format (CRF), according to the guidelines provided by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the European Union’s Greenhouse Gas Monitoring Mechanism. As a whole, an annual GHG inventory submission shall consist of a national inventory report (NIR) and the common reporting format (CRF) tables as specified in the Guidelines on reporting and review of greenhouse gas inventories from Parties included in Annex I to the Convention, decision 24/CP.19, in FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.3.

Detailed information on emission figures and estimation procedures, including all the basic data needed to carry out the final estimates, is to be provided to improve the transparency, consistency, comparability, accuracy and completeness of the inventory provided.

The national inventory is updated annually in order to reflect revisions and improvements in the methodology and use of the best information available. Adjustments are applied retrospectively to earlier years, which accounts for any difference in previously published data.

This report provides an analysis of the Italian GHG emission inventory communicated to the Secretariat of

the Climate Change Convention and to the European Commission in the framework of the Greenhouse Gas

Monitoring Mechanism in the year 2000, including the update for the year 2018 and the revision of the entire

time series 1990-2017.

(18)

Concerning the reporting and accounting requirements, under the KP CP2 each Party is required to submit a report, the initial report, to facilitate the calculation of its assigned amount and to demonstrate its capacity to account for its emissions and assigned amount (UNFCC Decision 2/CMP.8). The ratification decision allows a joint initial report of the EU, its Member States and Iceland, to be prepared by the European Commission, and individual initial reports of each Member States and Iceland. In its initial report, Italy describes the national assigned amount as well as the commitment period reserve.

The election of LULUCF activities under Article 3, paragraph 4, of the Kyoto Protocol for the commitment period 2013-2020 is also indicated in the same document; Italy has elected cropland and grazing land management activities.

Emission estimates comprise the seven direct greenhouse gases under the Kyoto Protocol (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulphur hexafluoride, nitrogen trifluoride) which contribute directly to climate change owing to their positive radiative forcing effect and four indirect greenhouse gases (nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, non-methane volatile organic compounds, sulphur dioxide).

This report, the CRF files and other related documents are available on website at the address http://www.sinanet.isprambiente.it/it/sia-ispra/serie-storiche-emissioni.

The official inventory submissions can also be found at the UNFCCC website https://unfccc.int/ghg- inventories-annex-i-parties/2020.

ES.2. Summary of national emission and removal related trends

Total greenhouse gas emissions, in CO 2 equivalent, excluding emissions and removals from land use, land use change and forestry, decreased by 17.2% between 1990 and 2018 (from 516 to 428 millions of CO 2

equivalent tons).

The most important greenhouse gas, CO 2 , which accounted for 81.4% of total emissions in CO 2 equivalent in 2018, showed a decrease by 20.5% between 1990 and 2018. CH 4 and N 2 O emissions were equal to 10.1%

and 4.1%, respectively, of the total CO 2 equivalent greenhouse gas emissions in 2018. Both gases showed a decrease from 1990 to 2018, equal to 10.8% and 32.0% for CH 4 and N 2 O, respectively.

Other greenhouse gases, HFCs, PFCs, SF 6 and NF 3 , ranged from 0.01% to 3.9% of total emissions.

Table ES.1 illustrates the national trend of greenhouse gases for 1990-2018, expressed in CO 2 equivalent

terms, by substance and category.

(19)

Table ES.1. Total greenhouse gas emissions and removals in CO 2 equivalent [Gg CO 2 eq]

GHG emissions 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018

Gg CO 2 equivalent CO 2 excluding net CO 2

from LULUCF 438,009 448,333 468,442 500,006 433,688 360,088 356,556 351,474 348,085 CO 2 including net CO 2

from LULUCF 432,347 423,476 446,120 463,963 390,975 315,884 315,596 328,245 311,176 CH 4 excluding CH 4 from

LULUCF 48,247 50,326 50,766 48,328 46,980 43,884 43,399 43,658 43,033

CH 4 including CH 4 from

LULUCF 49,429 50,606 51,449 48,609 47,289 44,151 43,695 45,005 43,203

N 2 O excluding N 2 O from

LULUCF 26,036 27,579 28,648 28,032 19,078 17,859 18,100 18,007 17,695

N 2 O including N 2 O from

LULUCF 26,961 28,507 29,383 28,690 19,507 18,187 18,532 18,529 18,168

HFCs 444 927 2,489 7,617 12,053 15,389 15,963 16,408 16,570

PFCs 2,907 1,492 1,488 1,940 1,520 1,688 1,614 1,314 1,657

Unspecified mix of HFCs

and PFCs NO 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 21

SF 6 408 680 604 550 394 472 399 417 446

NF 3 NO 77 13 33 20 28 34 23 22

Total (excluding

LULUCF) 516,052 529,435 552,474 586,529 513,756 439,432 436,088 431,324 427,529 Total (including

LULUCF) 512,496 505,788 531,570 551,426 471,782 395,822 395,857 409,964 391,263

GHG categories 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018

Gg CO 2 equivalent

1. Energy 423,555 436,219 457,280 485,343 426,136 357,289 353,493 348,508 344,328 2. Industrial Processes and

Product Use 40,484 38,374 39,198 47,263 37,069 33,265 33,477 33,939 34,724 3. Agriculture 34,709 34,846 34,107 32,040 30,147 30,299 30,831 30,625 30,187 4. LULUCF -3,556 -23,647 -20,904 -35,104 -41,975 -43,610 -40,231 -21,360 -36,266 5. Waste 17,304 19,996 21,890 21,883 20,404 18,579 18,288 18,252 18,290

6. Other NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

Total (including LULUCF) 512,496 505,788 531,570 551,426 471,782 395,822 395,857 409,964 391,263

(20)

ES.3. Overview of source and sink category emission estimates and trends

The energy sector is the largest contributor to national total GHG emissions with a share, in 2018, of 80.5%.

Emissions from this sector decreased by 18.7% from 1990 to 2018. Substances with decrease rates were CO 2 , whose levels reduced by 18.5% from 1990 to 2018 and accounts for 96.5% of the total in the energy sector, and CH 4 which showed a reduction of 34.4% but its share out of the sectoral total is only 2.2%; N 2 O, also, showed an increase of 0.4% from 1990 to 2018, accounting for 1.3%. Specifically, in terms of total CO 2

equivalent, an increase in emissions was observed in the other sectors, about 5.8%, from 1990 to 2018; in 2018 this sector accounted for 24.2% of total energy sector emissions.

For the industrial processes sector, emissions showed a decrease of 14.2% from 1990 to 2018. Specifically, by substance, CO 2 emissions account for 44.0% and showed a decrease by 48.0%, CH 4 decreased by 65.9%, but it accounts only for 0.1%, while N 2 O, whose levels share 1.9% of total industrial emissions, decreased by 90.6%. The decrease in emissions is mostly due to a decrease in chemical industry (due to the fully operational abatement technology in the adipic acid industry) and mineral and metal production emissions. A considerable increase was observed in F-gases emissions (more than 300%), whose level on total sectoral emissions is 53.9%. It should be noted that, except for the motivations explained, the economic recession has had a remarkable influence on the production levels of most the industries and consequent emissions in the last years.

For agriculture, emissions refer mainly to CH 4 and N 2 O levels, which account for 63.8% and 34.8% of the sectoral total, respectively; CO 2 , on the other hand, shares only 1.4% of the total. The decrease observed in the total emissions (-13.0%) is mostly due to the decrease of CH 4 emissions from enteric fermentation (- 8.4%), which account for 47.1% of sectoral emissions and to the decrease of N 2 O from agricultural soils (- 17.5%), which accounts for 27.6% of sectoral emissions.

As regards land use, land-use change and forestry, from 1990 to 2018 total removals in CO 2 equivalent considerably increased; CO 2 accounts for almost the total emissions and removals of the sector (98.3%).

Finally, emissions from the waste sector increased by 5.7% from 1990 to 2018, mainly due to an increase in the emissions from solid waste disposal on land (12.3%), which account for 74.9% of waste emissions. The most important greenhouse gas in this sector is CH 4 which accounts for 89.2% of the sectoral emissions and shows an increase of 5.5% from 1990 to 2018. N 2 O emission levels increased by 41.9%, whereas CO 2

decreased by 82.1%; these gases account for 10.3% and 0.5% in the sector, respectively.

Table ES.2 provides an overview of the CO 2 equivalent emission trends by IPCC source category.

(21)

Table ES.2. Summary of emission trends by source category and gas in CO 2 equivalent [Gg CO 2 eq.]

Category 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018

Gg CO 2

equivalent

A. Energy: fuel combustion 410,628 424,048 446,411 475,923 417,494 349,653 346,475 341,329 337,529 CO 2 : 1. Energy Industries 136,798 139,794 143,841 158,382 136,423 105,200 104,066 104,205 95,282 CO 2 : 2. Manufacturing Industries

and Construction 89,697 88,055 93,848 90,053 67,365 54,016 52,608 51,418 52,887 CO 2 : 3. Transport 100,299 111,505 121,406 126,595 114,185 105,057 103,639 99,765 103,096 CO 2 : 4. Other Sectors 75,721 75,167 78,604 91,660 90,381 77,236 78,130 77,867 78,382

CO 2 : 5. Other 1,071 1,496 837 1,233 652 459 515 326 341

CH 4 2,446 2,704 2,472 2,308 3,168 3,009 2,933 3,111 2,922

N 2 O 4,596 5,326 5,403 5,692 5,321 4,676 4,584 4,636 4,618

1B2. Energy: fugitives from oil &

gas 12,927 12,171 10,869 9,421 8,642 7,636 7,018 7,179 6,799

CO 2 4,048 4,002 3,262 2,557 2,377 2,574 2,189 2,351 2,295

CH 4 8,868 8,157 7,595 6,850 6,253 5,052 4,820 4,818 4,495

N 2 O 12 12 12 13 12 10 9 10 9

2. Industrial processes 40,484 38,374 39,198 47,263 37,069 33,265 33,477 33,939 34,724

CO 2 29,397 27,341 25,908 28,774 21,775 15,009 14,767 15,013 15,289

CH 4 129 134 73 74 60 42 48 44 44

N 2 O 7,199 7,701 8,599 8,251 1,224 613 629 697 675

HFCs 444 927 2,489 7,617 12,053 15,389 15,963 16,408 16,570

PFCs 2,907 1,492 1,488 1,940 1,520 1,688 1,614 1,314 1,657

Unspecified mix of HFCs and

PFCs NO 23 23 23 23 23 23 22.95 20.92

SF 6 408 680 604 550 394 472 399 417 446

NF 3 NO 77 13 33 20 28 34 23 22.13

3. Agriculture 34,709 34,846 34,107 32,040 30,147 30,299 30,831 30,625 30,187

CO 2 : Liming 1 1 2 14 18 14 12 17 15

CO 2 : Urea application 465 512 525 507 335 425 527 418 405

CH 4 : Enteric fermentation 15,497 15,319 15,048 13,709 13,530 13,695 14,039 14,209 14,202 CH 4 : Manure management 3,948 3,785 3,764 3,711 3,774 3,806 3,541 3,543 3,480 CH 4 : Rice Cultivation 1,876 1,989 1,656 1,752 1,822 1,668 1,715 1,644 1,553 CH 4 : Field Burning of Agricultural

Residues 15 15 15 16 15 16 17 15 15

N 2 O: Manure management 2,817 2,689 2,642 2,466 2,434 2,287 2,241 2,232 2,190 N 2 O: Agriculture soils 10,086 10,532 10,451 9,860 8,214 8,384 8,734 8,542 8,322 N 2 O: Field Burning of Agricultural

Residues 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

4A. Land-use change and

forestry -3,556 -23,647 -20,904 -35,104 -41,975 -43,610 -40,231 -21,360 -36,266 CO 2 -5,662 -24,857 -22,322 -36,043 -42,713 -44,204 -40,960 -23,229 -36,909

CH 4 1,181 281 683 281 309 267 296 1,347 171

N 2 O 925 929 735 658 429 327 432 522 473

6. Waste 17,304 19,996 21,890 21,883 20,404 18,579 18,288 18,252 18,290

CO 2 512 458 208 230 177 99 103 92 91

CH 4 15,470 18,223 20,144 19,907 18,358 16,595 16,288 16,272 16,321

N 2 O 1,323 1,315 1,538 1,746 1,869 1,885 1,897 1,888 1,877

Total emissions (with LULUCF) 512,496 505,788 531,570 551,426 471,782 395,822 395,857 409,964 391,263 Total emissions (without

LULUCF) 516,052 529,435 552,474 586,529 513,756 439,432 436,088 431,324 427,529

(22)

ES.4. Other information

In Table ES.3 NO X , CO, NMVOC and SO 2 emission trends from 1990 to 2018 are summarised.

All gases showed a significant reduction in 2018 as compared to 1990 levels. The highest reduction is observed for SO 2 (-93.5%), while NO X and CO emissions reduced by about 68.3% and 65.7% respectively;

NMVOC levels showed a decrease by 51.8%.

Table ES.3. Total emissions of indirect greenhouse gases and SO 2 (1990-2018) [Gg]

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2016 2017 2018 Gg

NO X 2,066 1,991 1,512 1,296 951 735 715 675 672

CO 7,213 7,071 4,748 3,494 3,114 2,303 2,227 2,333 2,080

NMVOC 2,001 2,022 1,600 1,361 1,137 917 901 947 913

SO 2 1,784 1,323 756 410 218 124 117 115 110

(23)

Sommario (Italian)

Nel documento “Italian Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990-2018. National Inventory Report 2020” si descrive la comunicazione annuale italiana dell’inventario delle emissioni dei gas serra in accordo a quanto previsto nell’ambito della Convenzione Quadro sui Cambiamenti Climatici delle Nazioni Unite (UNFCCC), del protocollo di Kyoto. Tale comunicazione è anche trasmessa all’Unione Europea nell’ambito del Meccanismo di Monitoraggio dei Gas Serra.

Ogni Paese che partecipa alla Convenzione, infatti, oltre a fornire annualmente l’inventario nazionale delle emissioni dei gas serra secondo i formati richiesti, deve documentare in un report, il National Inventory Report, la serie storica delle emissioni. La documentazione prevede una spiegazione degli andamenti osservati, una descrizione dell’analisi delle sorgenti principali, key sources, e dell’incertezza ad esse associata, un riferimento alle metodologie di stima e alle fonti dei dati di base e dei fattori di emissione utilizzati per le stime, un’illustrazione del sistema di Quality Assurance/Quality Control a cui è soggetto l’inventario e delle attività di verifica effettuate sui dati.

Il National Inventory Report facilita, inoltre, i processi internazionali di verifica cui le stime di emissione dei gas serra sono sottoposte al fine di esaminarne la rispondenza alle proprietà di trasparenza, consistenza, comparabilità, completezza e accuratezza nella realizzazione, qualità richieste esplicitamente dalla Convenzione suddetta. Nel caso in cui, durante il processo di review, siano identificati eventuali errori nel formato di trasmissione o stime non supportate da adeguata documentazione e giustificazione nella metodologia scelta, il Paese viene invitato ad una revisione delle stime di emissione.

I dati di emissione dei gas-serra, i rapporti National Inventory Report, così come i risultati dei processi di review, sono pubblicati sul sito web del Segretariato della Convenzione sui Cambiamenti Climatici

https://unfccc.int/ghg-inventories-annex-i-parties/2020.

La serie storica nazionale delle emissioni è anche disponibile sul sito web all’indirizzo:

http://www.sinanet.isprambiente.it/it/sia-ispra/serie-storiche-emissioni .

Da un’analisi di sintesi della serie storica dei dati di emissione dal 1990 al 2018, si evidenzia che le

emissioni nazionali totali dei sei gas serra, espresse in CO 2 equivalente, sono diminuite del 17.2% nel 2018

rispetto al 1990. In particolare, le emissioni complessive di CO 2 sono pari all’81.4% del totale e risultano nel

2018 inferiori del 20.5% rispetto al 1990. Le emissioni di metano e di protossido di azoto sono pari a circa il

10.1% e 4.1% del totale, rispettivamente, e presentano andamenti in diminuzione sia per il metano (-10.8%)

che per il protossido di azoto (-32.0%). Gli altri gas serra, HFC, PFC, SF 6 e NF 3, hanno un peso complessivo

sul totale delle emissioni che varia tra lo 0.01% e il 3.9%; le emissioni degli HFC evidenziano una forte

crescita, mentre le emissioni di PFC decrescono e quelle di SF 6 e NF 3 mostrano un incremento. Sebbene tali

variazioni non siano risultate determinanti ai fini del conseguimento degli obiettivi di riduzione delle

emissioni, la significatività del trend degli HFC potrebbe renderli sempre più importanti nei prossimi anni.

(24)

PART I: ANNUAL INVENTORY SUBMISSION

(25)

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background information on greenhouse gas inventories and climate change

In 1988 the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) established a scientific Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in order to evaluate the available scientific information on climate variations, examine the social and economical influence on climate change and formulate suitable strategies for the prevention and the control of climate change.

The first IPCC report in 1990, although considering the high uncertainties in the evaluation of climate change, emphasised the risk of a global warming due to an unbalance in the climate system originated by the increase of anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs) caused by industrial development and use of fossil fuels. More recently, the scientific knowledge on climate change has firmed up considerably by the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on global warming which states that “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal (…). There is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities (…). Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations”. Hence the need of reducing those emissions, particularly for the most industrialised countries.

The first initiative was taken by the European Union (EU) at the end of 1990, when the EU adopted the goal of a stabilisation of carbon dioxide emissions by the year 2000 at the level of 1990 and requested Member States to plan and implement initiatives for environmental protection and energy efficiency. The contents of EU statement were the base for the negotiation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) which was approved in New York on 9 th May 1992 and signed during the summit of the Earth in Rio the Janeiro in June 1992. Parties to the Convention are committed to develop, publish and regularly update national emission inventories of greenhouse gases (GHGs) as well as formulate and implement programmes addressing anthropogenic GHG emissions. Specifically, Italy ratified the convention through law no.65 of 15/1/1994.

On 11/12/1997, Parties to the Convention adopted the Kyoto Protocol, which establishes emission reduction objectives for Annex B Parties (i.e. industrialised countries and countries with economy in transition) in the period 2008-2012. In particular, the European Union as a whole was committed to an 8% reduction within the period 2008-2012, in comparison with base year levels. For Italy, the EU burden sharing agreement, set out in Annex II to Decision 2002/358/EC and in accordance with Article 4 of the Kyoto Protocol, established a reduction objective of 6.5% in the commitment period, in comparison with the base 1990 levels.

Italy ratified the Kyoto Protocol on 1 st June 2002 through law no.120 of 01/06/2002. The ratification law prescribes also the preparation of a National Action Plan to reduce greenhouse gas emission, which was adopted by the Interministerial Committee for Economic Planning (CIPE) on 19 th December 2002 (deliberation n. 123 of 19/12/2002). The Kyoto Protocol finally entered into force on 16 th February 2005.

The first commitment period ended in 2012, with an extension, for fulfilling commitments, to 18 th November 2015, the so called true-up period. The evaluation of the Kyoto Protocol, together with the commitments fulfilled by each Party, has been finalized by the UNFCCC Secretariat.

A new global agreement was reached in Paris in December 2015, for the period after 2020. The agreement

aims to strengthen the global response to the treat of climate change by holding the increase in the global

temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature

increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and

impact of climate change. In order to achieve this long-term temperature goal, Parties aim to reach global

peaking of GHG emissions as soon as possible and undertake rapid reductions so as to achieve a balance

between anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks in the second half of this century. Each

Party shall prepare, communicate and maintain successive nationally determined contributions that it intends

to achieve. On 5 October 2016, the threshold for entry into force of the Paris Agreement was achieved (at

least 55 Parties to the Convention accounting in total for at least an estimated 55 percent of the total global

greenhouse gas emissions, where “total global greenhouse gas emissions” means the most up-to-date amount

communicated on or before the date of adoption of the Agreement). The Paris Agreement entered into force

on 4 November 2016.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The Biological Research Institute that I represent was founded by a great support of the scientific staff of the University of Lecce and Bari regarding the direction of the study

organization service evaluation can be used as standard basis for the standardization and self-discipline of technical service ability in the environmental protection

The main basic data needed for the preparation of the GHG inventory are energy statistics published by the Ministry of Economic Development Activities (MSE) in the National

Overall 259 substances were detected, more than in previous years, 244 substances in surface water and 200 in groundwater. Herbicides are the most occurring substances,

The Regions with the highest number of Industry and services local units located in high and very high landslide hazard zones are Campania, Toscana, Emilia-Romagna and Lazio.

Just before plantation seedlings morphological characteristics (root and shoot bio- mass, leaf area, height, stem diameter, root length and root development patterns) were measured

Habitat loss and/or variations, with effects on the flora and fauna (e.g. changes in species composition) Effects on the flora (e.g. a decreased photosynthetic ability) and on

Altri dati difficili da reperire sono stati quelli relativi agli assegnisti di ricerca, complessi da disaggregare per genere perché non gestiti a livello centralizzato, ma dai