• Non ci sono risultati.

De Lange Syndrome

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "De Lange Syndrome"

Copied!
6
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

276 In 1933, Cornelia de Lange reported two nonfamilial infant girls with severe mental retardation and multiple abnormalities of the skull, face, and extremities. Earlier in 1916, Brachmann had described a child with similar features. The syndrome is also called Brachmann-de Lange syndrome or Cornelia de Lange syndrome. The prevalence is estimated to be 1 in 10,000 births.

GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS

1. A heterogeneous clinical entity

a. Sporadic in vast majority of cases (99%) b. Striking concordance in MZ twins c. Rare familial occurrences

i. Autosomal dominant inheritance

ii. Autosomal recessive inheritance: unlikely 2. Both missense and protein-truncating mutations in

NIPBL, the human homolog of the Drosophila melan- gaster Nipped-B gene, have recently been reported to cause de Lange syndrome

3. Inconsistent chromosome abnormalities occasionally associated with de Lange phenotype

CLINICAL FEATURES

1. Marked clinical variability 2. General history

a. Prenatal and/or postnatal growth deficiency b. Prematurity

c. Diminished sucking and swallowing ability

d. Low pitched cry (74%) in the newborn period and in the early infancy but may disappear in the late infancy e. Global developmental delay

f. Initial hypertonicity

g. Recurrent respiratory tract infections h. Gastroesophageal reflux

i. Failure to thrive 3. Growth

a. Prenatal onset growth retardation b. Short stature

4. Skin

a. Hypertrichosis (hirsutism) (78%): often with hairy whorls over the shoulders, lower back, and extremities b. Cutis marmorata (60%)

c. Periorbital “cyanosis”

5. Characteristic craniofacial appearance a. Microcephaly (98%)

b. Brachycephaly

c. Hairy (low hairline) forehead

d. Mask like (grim, devoid of expression) facies e. Hypertelorism

f. Antimongoloid slant of palpebral fissures

g. Synophrys (prominent bushy, confluent eyebrows joining at the nose) (99%)

h. Long and curly eyelashes (99%)

i. Depressed nasal bridge (83%) j. Small nose

k. Anteverted nares (88%) l. Micrognathia (84%)

m. Long bulging, prominent philtrum (94%) n. Thin upper lip (94%)

o. Central depression below lower lip p. Down turned corners of the mouth (94%) q. Late eruption of teeth

r. Widely spaced teeth (86%) s. High arched palate (86%)

t. Low set, malformed, and hairy ears (70%) u. Low posterior hairline (92%)

v. Short neck (66%) 6. Eye abnormalities (57%)

a. Strabismus b. Nystagmus (37%) c. Myopia (60%) d. Ptosis (45%) e. Microcornea f. Astigmatism g. Optic atrophy

h. Coloboma of the optic nerve i. Eccentric pupils

j. Microphthalmia k. Blue sclerae 7. Limb abnormalities

a. Upper extremities

i. Micromelia (shortened limbs) (93%) ii. Ectrodactyly/oligodactyly/phocomelia (27%) iii. Clinodactyly of the 5th fingers (74%)

iv. Small hands

v. Proximally placed thumbs vi. Camptodactyly

vii. Webbings of fingers viii. Brachydactyly

ix. Flexion contractures of the elbows common (64%)

x. Restriction of supination and pronations xi. Subluxation or dislocation of the radial head b. Lower extremities

i. Small feet

ii. Cutaneous syndactyly of the second and third toes (86%)

iii. Tight Achilles tendon (equines deformity) iv. Pes planus

v. Valgus heel

vi. Flexion contractures of the knees 8. CNS anomalies

a. Variable mental retardation to near-normal intellect b. Seizures (23%)

c. Abnormal speech development d. Hearing deficits (60–100%)

(2)

e. Hypoplasia of the vermis f. Hypertonia/hypotonia 9. Behavior disorder

a. Sleep disturbance (55%) b. Aggression (49%)

c. Self-destructive tendencies (44%) d. Hyperactivity (40%)

e. Low-pitched growling sound rather than cry f. Infrequent facial expressions of emotion g. Severe language delay

h. Autistic-like behavior

i. Repetitive stereotypic movement

j. Eliciting pleasurable responses by vestibular stimula- tion or vigorous movement

10. Other anomalies

a. Small hypoplastic nipples (55%) b. Small hypoplastic umbilicus (53%) c. Cardiovascular anomalies (15–20%)

i. Ventricular septal defect ii. Atrial septal defect iii. Patent ductus arteriosus

iv. Aortic valve anomaly v. Hypoplasia of the aorta

vi. Persistent left superior vena cava vii. Pulmonary stenosis

viii. Endocardial cushion defect ix. Tetralogy of Fallot

d. Gastrointestinal anomalies i. Inguinal hernia ii. Hiatus hernia

iii. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia iv. Gut duplication

v. Malrotation of colon vi. Pyloric stenosis e. Genitourinary anomalies

i. Hypoplastic, dysplastic, or cystic kidneys ii. Hypoplastic external genitalia, cryptorchidism

or hypospadias in males

iii. Small labia majora, bicornuate or septate uterus in females

f. Abnormal dermatoglyphics

i. Transverse palmar creases (51%) ii. Increased atd angle

iii. Hypoplastic finger ridge patterns

DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS

1. Radiography a. Skull

i. Microcephaly: frequent ii. Brachycephaly: frequent

iii. Trigonocephaly with orbital hypotelorism iv. Parietal foramina

v. Micrognathia vi. High-arched palate vii. Cleft palate b. Spine

i. Kyphoscoliosis ii. Platyspondyly iii. Scheuermann disease

iv. Spina bifida v. Square vertebrae vi. Coxa valga c. Chest

i. Aspiration pneumonia: frequent ii. Thin ribs

iii. Short clavicles

iv. Short hypoplastic sternum with reduced number of ossification centers

v. Abnormal sternal angle vi. Cervical ribs

vii. Hypoplasia of the first rib viii. Chronic pneumonia

ix. Bronchiolitis d. Congenital heart diseases e. Gastrointestinal tract

i. Swallowing dysfunction: frequent

ii. Bowel rotation anomalies with bands: frequent iii. Hiatal hernia

iv. Hypertrophic pyloric stenosis v. Duodenal stenosis

vi. Colon duplication vii. Inguinal hernia viii. Umbilical hernia f. Genitourinary tract

i. Incomplete rotation of the kidneys ii. Renal duplication

iii. Polycystic kidneys iv. Chronic pyelonephritis

v. Abnormal renal function with poor visualization on excretory urography

vi. Vesicoureteral reflux

vii. Divided uterine canal with septate vagina g. Limbs

i. Micromelia: frequent

ii. Short humerus and/or forearm bones: frequent iii. Elongated humeral neck (similar to femoral

neck): frequent

iv. Subluxation or dislocation of malformed radius and/or ulna at elbow with fixation in flexion v. Absent or hypoplastic ulna: frequent

vi. Retarded bone maturation with abnormal sequence of appearance of ossification centers:

frequent

vii. Absent carpals, metacarpals, and fingers (ectro- dactyly/oligodactyly): frequent

viii. Short, broad metacarpals, particularly 1 and 5:

frequent

ix. Hypoplastic phalanges particularly middle 5th (curved) and middle second fingers: frequent x. Cutaneous syndactyly of second and third toes or

other toes and fingers: frequent xi. Cutis valgus

xii. Absent or hypoplastic radius xiii. Lunate and triquetral fusion

xiv. Aplastic or hypoplastic ulnar styloid

xv. Double distal phalanges of thumbs and/or great toes

xvi. Congenital dislocated hips xvii. Aseptic necrosis of femoral head

(3)

xviii. Broad ischial bones xix. Large obturator foramina

xx. Short broad femoral necks xxi. Absent tibia with deformed fibula xxii. Fusion of phalanges of fifth toe xxiii. Rocker-bottom foot

xxiv. Metatarsus adductus xxv. Planovalgoid foot xxvi. Talipes equinovarus

xxvii. Shortening of femur and/or leg bones xxviii. Wide gap between first and second toes

xxix. Osteoporosis

2. Endocrinologic studies in patients with severe growth retardation

3. Echocardiography for evaluation of congenital heart defects

4. Abdominal ultrasonography for GU anomalies 5. EEG for seizures

6. High resolution chromosome analysis for associated chromosome anomaly

7. DNA mutation analysis of NIPBL (positive in 47%)

GENETIC COUNSELING

1. Recurrence risk

a. Patient’s sib: an empiric risk of about 1–4%

b. Patient’s offspring: 50% in case of an autosomal dom- inant inheritance

2. Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasonography a. Intrauterine growth retardation b. Characteristic facies

i. A small bulging nose ii. Long bulging philtrum

iii. Protruding and overhanging upper lip iv. Micrognathia

c. Limb defects i. Micromelia ii. Monodactyly iii. Ulnar agenesis d. Diaphragmatic hernia 3. Management

a. Adequate caloric intake

b. Treat gastroesophageal reflux with thickened feeds in an upright position and pharmacotherapy

c. Fitting of hearing aids and early consistent training for hearing impaired children

d. Early intervention and special education programs for psychomotor delay

e. Behavioral modification

f. Correction of refractory errors with glasses g. Anticonvulsants for seizures

h. Surgical repairs

i. Fundoplication and gastrostomy feedings necessary in patients with severe esophagitis and progressive failure to thrive despite conservative intervention ii. Diaphragmatic hernia

iii. Cardiac defect

iv. Severe skeletal deformities v. Renal malformations

vi. Ptosis obstructing the visual axis vii. Orchiplexy

REFERENCES

Aberfeld DC, Pourfar M: De Lange’s Amsterdam dwarfs syndrome. Report of two cases. Dev Med Child Neurol 7:35–41, 1965.

Abraham JM, Russell A: De Lange syndrome. A study of nine examples. Acta Paediatr Scand 57:339–353, 1968.

Ackerman J, Gilbert-Barnes E: Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet 68:367–368, 1997.

Beck B: Epidemiology of Cornelia de Lange’s syndrome. Acta Paediatr Scand 65:631–638, 1976.

Beck B: Psycho-social assessment of 36 de Lange patients. J Ment Defic Res 31:251–257, 1987.

Beratis NG, Hsu LY, Hirschhorn K: Familial de Lange syndrome. Report of three cases in a sibship. Clin Genet 2:170–176, 1971.

Berney TP, Ireland M, Burn J: Behavioural phenotype of Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Arch Dis Child 81:333–336, 1999.

Brachmann W: Ein Fall von symmetrischer Monodaktylie durch Ulnadefekt, mit symmetrischer Flughautbildung in den Ellenbeugen, sowie anderen Abnormalitaten. Jahr Kinderheiklunde 84:225–235, 1916.

Braddock Skelet Radiol, Lachman RS, Stoppenhagen CC,et al.: Radiological features in Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47:1006–1013, 1993.

Breslau EJ, Disteche C, hall JG, et al.: Prometaphase chromosomes in five patients with the Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet 10:179–186, 1981.

Bryson Y, Sakati N, Nyhan WL, et al.: Self-mutilative behavior in the Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Am J Ment Defic 76:319–324, 1971.

Chrzanowska KH, Janniger CK: de Lange syndrome. Emedicine, 2002.

http://www.emedicine.com

De Lange C: Sur un type nouveau de dégénération (typus amstelodamensis).

Arch med Enfants 36:713–719, 1933.

Filippi G: The de Lange syndrome. Report of 15 cases. Clin Genet 35:343–363, 1989.

Gadoth N, Lerman M, Garty B-Z, et al.: Normal intelligence in the Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Johns Hop Med J 150:70–72, 1982.

Gillis LA, McCallum J, Kaur M, et al.: NIPBL mutational analysis in 120 indi- viduals with Cornelia de Lange syndrome and evaluation of genotype–phenotype correlations. Am J Hum Genet 75:610–623, 2004.

Goodban MT: Survey of speech and language skills with prognostic indicators in 116 patients with Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47:1059–1063, 1993.

Goolsby LM, McNamara MF, Andeson CF, et al.: Diagnosis: Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 14:325–336, 1995.

Greenberg F, Robinson LK: Mild Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: changes of phenotype with age. Am J Med Genet 32:90–92, 1989.

Halal F, Preus M: The hand profile in de Lange syndrome: diagnostic criteria.

Am J Med Genet 3:317–323, 1979.

Hawley PD, Jackson LG, Kurnit DM: Sixty-four patients with Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: A survey Am J Med genet 20:453–459, 1985.

Ireland M: Cornelia de Lange syndrome. In: Cassidy SB, Allanson JE (eds):

Management of Genetic Syndromes. New York: Wiley-Liss, 2001.

Ireland M, Donnai D, Burn J: Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Delineation of the clinical phenotype. Am J Med Genet 47:959–964, 1993.

Jackson L, Kline AD, Barr MA,et al.: de Lange syndrome: a clinical review of 310 individuals. Am J Med Genet 47:940–946, 1993.

Jervis GA, Stimson CW: de Lange syndrome. The “Amsterdam type” of men- tal defect with congenital malformation. J Pediatr 63:634–645, 1963.

Johnson Hum Genet, Ekman P, Friesen W: A behavioral phenotype in the de Lange syndrome. Pediatr Res 10:843–850, 1976.

Joubin J, Pettrone CF, Pettrone FA: Cornelia de Lange’s syndrome. A review article (with emphasis on orthopedic significance). Clin Orthop Relat Res171:180–185, 1982.

Kousseff BG, Newkirk P, Root AW: Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. 1994 update. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148:749–755, 1994.

Kurlander GJ, DeMyer W: Roentgenology of the Brachmann-de Lange syn- drome. Radiology 88:101–110, 1967.

Lee FA, Kenny FM: Skeletal changes in the Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 100:27–39, 1967.

Marino T, Wheeler PG, Simpson LL, et al.: Fetal diaphragmatic hernia and upper limb anomalies suggest Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Prenat Diagn 22:144–147, 2002.

McArthur RG, Edwards JH: DeLange syndrome: Report of 20 cases. Can Med Assoc J 96:1185–1198, 1967.

(4)

Motl ML, Opitz JM: Studies of malformation syndromes XXVA. Phenotypic and genetic studies of the Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Hum Hered 21:1–16, 1971.

Opitz JM: Editorial comment: the Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Am J Med Genet 22:89–102, 1985.

Opitz JM: Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: a continuing enigma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148:1206–1208, 1994.

Pashayan H: Variability of the de Lange syndrome: report of three cases and genetic analysis of 54 families. J Pediatr 75:853–858, 1969.

Pashayan Hum Mutat, Fraser FC, Pruzansky S: Variable limb malformations in the Brachmann-de Lange syndrome. Birth Defects Original Article Series 11(5):147–156, 1975.

Preus M, Rex AP: Definition and diagnosis of the Brachmann-de Lange syn- drome. Am J Med Genet 16:301–312, 1983.

Ptacek LJ, Opitz JM, Smith DW, et al.: The Cornelia de Lange syndrome. J Pediatr 63:1000–1020, 1963.

Russell KL, Ming JE, Patel K, et al.: Dominant paternal transmission of Cornelia de Lange syndrome: a new case and review of 25 previously reported familial recurrences. Am J Med Genet 104:267–276, 2001.

Silver HK: The de Lange syndrome. Typus Amstelodamensis. Am J Dis Child 108:523–529, 1964.

Tekin M, Bodurtha J: Cornelia de Lange syndrome. Emedicine, 2002.

http://www.emedicine.com

Van Allen MI, Filippi G, Siegel-Bartelt J, et al.: Clinical variability within Brachmann-de Lange syndrome: a proposed classification system. Am J Med Genet 47:947–958, 1993.

(5)

Fig. 1. A neonate and a child with de Lange syndrome showing char- acteristic facies, oligodactyly, and severe hirsutism.

(6)

Fig 2. Four patients with classic De Lange syndrome of different ages showing typical facial appearance (synophrys, coarse eyebrows, long curly eyelashes, depressed nasal bridge with anteverted nares, long thin upper lip, down-turned angles of the mouth, and widely spaced teeth) and ectrodactyly/oligodactyly in the first two cases.

Fig 3. A 46,XX male with de Lange phenotype.

Fig 4. Two adults with de Lange syndrome showing hirsutism and mental retardation.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Recent findings of sporadic autochthonous canine infections and the presence of phlebotomine vectors in some provinces of north-eastern Italy have stimulated risk assessment for

The latter, more sensitive to the surface, evidences a larger (smaller) Mn (Ir) content than the former, more bulk-sensitive, thus indicating the presence of a

“Gender Differences in the Choice of Major: The Importance of Female Role Models.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 12, 226– 254.. “Female Role Models Inspire Women

Effects of compost and defatted oilseed meals as sustainable organic fertilizer on Cardoon (Cynara Cardunculus L.) production in the Mediterranean basin.. Journal: The Journal

Decades after being hit by the virus, polio survivors may develop the so-called “post-polio syndrome” (PPS), a progressive condition characterized by chronic fatigue and pain,

Growth retardation, hirsutism, low anterior hairline, long eye- lashes, synophrys, long philtrum, micrognathia, absence deformity of distal upper limbs, flexion con- tracture at

However, findings indicate that students of the TLS group achieved a significantly higher accuracy and a better confidence calibration, while the textbook group exhibited a

The paper shows that graphene addition does not lower the very high sound absorption coefficient α, close to unity, in the frequency range 200–800 Hz, previously reported by the