1. West Nile Virus in the Americas
L YLE R. P ETERSEN , J OHN T. R OEHRIG , AND J AMES J. S EJVAR
1.1. Virology
West Nile virus (WNV) is a member of the Japanese encephalitis (JE) serocomplex, which contains four other medically important fla- viviruses: JE, St. Louis encephalitis (SLE), Murray Valley encephalitis (MVE), and Kunjin (KUN) viruses (Gubler and Roehrig, 1998). Until 1999, when WNV was first identified in the United States, each of these flaviviral encephalitis viruses had relatively unique geographic distribu- tions. Since 1999, however, WN and SLE viruses have co-circulated in North America (Lillibridge et al., 2004).
1.1.1. Virus Structure
Flaviviruses are enveloped, spherical RNA viruses, possessing an isometric core 30–35 nm in diameter, which contains capsid (C; 14 kDa) proteins complexed with single-stranded positive-sense RNA. This core is surrounded by a lipid bilayer containing an envelope (E; 50–60 kDa) protein and a membrane (M; 8 kDa) protein, giving a total virion diame- ter of about 45 nm (Chambers et al., 1990). The M-protein is first synthe- sized as a precursor protein, prM. The virion structure of WNV has recently been solved using cryoelectron microscopy (Mukhopadhyay et al., 2003). The virion envelope contains an icosahedral scaffold of 90 E-protein dimers.
1.1.2. Genome
The flavivirus genome is a single-stranded, positive-sense RNA
~11,000 nucleotides (nt) in length, which is capped at the 5′-end, but has no poly(A) tract at the 3′-end. Flavivirus RNAs have conserved noncod- ing sequences at the 5′- and 3′-ends. A 9 nt cyclization (5′-CYC) sequence near the 5′-end of the genome is complementary to a 3′-CYC sequence in
3
the 3′-terminal noncoding region (NCR), and these plus 3′ stem-loop and pseudoknot structures are required for initiation of RNA synthesis (Chambers et al., 1990; Khromykh et al., 2001; You et al., 2001). A model for KUNV RNA replication proposes that flavivirus RNA is synthesized asymmetrically and semiconservatively in a replicative intermediate that uses negative-sense RNA as a recycling template, and dsRNA can be detected in infected cells using anti-dsRNA antibodies (Westaway et al., 1999).
Complete nucleotide sequences have been reported for many fla- vivirus genomes, including all four dengue viruses (DENV) serotypes (Deubel et al., 1986; Zhao et al., 1986; Deubel et al., 1988; Hahn et al., 1988; Osatomi and Sumiyoshi, 1990; Fu et al., 1992; Kinney et al., 1997) and several isolates of WNV (Lanciotti et al., 2002). The gene order from the 5′-end of the flavivirus RNA genome is C, prM, E, NS1, NS2A, NS2B, NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5 (C, capsid; prM, premembrane; E, enve- lope; NS, nonstructural proteins). A single polyprotein is translated, then cleaved co- and post-translationally by host signalases and a viral encoded protease to produce the mature proteins. The development of infectious cDNA clone technology has been important for analyzing the genomes of DENV, yellow fever virus (YFV) and WNV (Rice et al., 1989;
Kinney et al., 1997; Yamshchikov et al., 2001; Shi et al., 2002). This tech- nology has allowed researchers to genetically manipulate RNA genomes and identify viral determinants of host range, attachment and fusion, virulence, replication, packaging, and assembly.
1.1.2.1. E-protein
The flavivirus E-protein is the most important antigen in regard to
virus biology and humoral immunity. It is a class II fusion protein that
interacts with cell receptors and elicits potent virus-neutralizing antibod-
ies. The E-protein also undergoes an irreversible conformational shift
when exposed to low pH, resulting in a cell-membrane fusion (CMF)-
competent form. Upon viral attachment and entry via low-pH endocytic
vesicles, it is assumed that this conformational shift results in fusion of
the virion envelope and the endocytic vesicular membrane, releasing the
nucleocapsid into the cytoplasm. During viral assembly and maturation in
low-pH exocytic vesicles, it is believed that the prM protein functions as
a chaperone for the E-protein, maintaining its native conformation. The
prM to M-cleavage occurs late in the maturational process, presumably as
the virion is released into a neutral-pH environment. Virions containing
uncleaved prM protein are less infectious and not capable of efficiently
initiating virus-mediated CMF.
The structure of the E-protein homodimer has been solved for tick- borne encephalitis (TBE) and DEN viruses. It is likely that the homod- imeric structure of the E-protein for all other flaviviruses, including WNV, will be similar. The molecular structure of the E-protein was first defined in studies using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) (Heinz et al., 1982; Kimura-Kuroda and Yasui, 1983; Roehrig et al., 1983; Heinz, 1986;
Guirakhoo et al., 1989; Mandl et al., 1989). Heinz and co-workers identi- fied three antigenic domains (A, B, and C) on the E-protein of TBEV.
Subsequent biochemical analyses of these domains determined that the A-domain approximately included amino acids (a.a.s) 51–135 and 195–284 and was a linearly discontinuous domain divided by C-domain (approximately a.a.s 1–50 and 136–194). Domain B included a.a.s 300–395. Our understanding of the structure–function relationships of the E-protein was greatly advanced by the solving of the 2 angstrom structure of the amino-terminal 395 amino acids of the TBEV and DENV E-protein homodimer (Modis et al., 2003, 2004). The E-protein folds into three distinct domains, I, II, and III, which correlate directly with the previously defined antigenic domains C, A, and B. The locations of the E- protein disulfide bonds are conserved among all flaviviruses (Nowak and Wengler, 1987); therefore, it has been generally assumed that the E-pro- tein structure is the same for all flaviviruses. The inability of reduced and denatured WNV E-protein to elicit antiviral neutralizing antibodies when inoculated into mice emphasizes the importance of conformation to virus neutralization (Wengler, 1989).
The regions of the E-protein involved in attachment to cell recep- tors were first localized through selection of viruses capable of resisting virus-neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). These neutralization escape variants have a.a. changes that prevent the binding of the select- ing neutralizing MAb. Several flaviviruses have been examined in this way (Lobigs et al., 1987; Holzmann et al., 1989; Mandl et al., 1989;
Cecilia and Gould, 1991; Hasegawa et al., 1992; Jiang et al., 1993; Gao et al., 1994; Lin et al., 1994; McMinn et al., 1995; Ryman et al., 1997;
Beasley and Aaskov, 2001; Lok et al., 2001; Morita et al., 2001). Most neutralization escape variants have been selected using MAbs that are either type or subtype specific, indicating a high degree of antigenic drift in the identified regions. Five neutralization regions on the E-protein have been identified: region 1, a.a.s 67–72 and 112; region 2, a.a.s 124–128; region 3, a.a.s 155, 158; region 4, a.a.s 274–279, 52, and 136;
and region 5, a.a.s 307–311, 333, 384, and 385. These regions are located
on the outer, upper surfaces of the E-protein primarily in domains II and
III, suggesting easy access to antiviral antibody. The ability of virus
neutralizing antibody to bind to the outer surfaces of the E-protein is
consistent with the two mechanisms of flavivirus neutralization thus far identified: blocking virus attachment to susceptible cells (Crill and Roehrig, 2001) and blocking virus-mediated CMF (Gollins and Porterfield, 1986a; Butrapet et al., 1998; Roehrig et al., 1998).
Antibody blocking of low-pH-catalyzed virus-mediated CMF was the first well-defined mechanism of WNV neutralization (Gollins and Porterfield, 1986a, 1986b, 1986c; Kimura et al., 1986). This mechanism of neutralization has since been confirmed with other flaviviviruses (Butrapet et al., 1998; Roehrig et al., 1998). Because a.a.s 98–110 of the E-protein in all flaviviruses are strictly conserved, uncharged, or hydropho- bic a.a.s, this region has been hypothesized to be the fusion peptide. Using DEN2V E-protein-derived antipeptide antibodies to probe the entire sequence of both native and low-pH-treated virions to assess the accessi- bility of E-protein regions at different pHs, it has been demonstrated that certain regions of the E-protein were more accessible after a low-pH-cat- alyzed conformational change (Roehrig, 2000). Not surprisingly, one of these newly exposed regions (a.a.s 58–121) included the putative fusion peptide and was spatially proximal to a second region (a.a.s 225–249) identified in domain II (Rey et al., 1995; Roehrig et al., 1998). These results were confirmed in a subsequent study with TBEV (Holzmann et al., 1993). Antigenic mapping of the DEN2V E-protein determined that two of the three epitopes that elicited virus fusion-blocking MAbs could be mapped to a peptide fragment composed of a.a.s 1–120 (Roehrig et al., 1998). One of these epitopes (A1) is flavivirus cross-reactive and confor- mation dependent (Roehrig et al., 1998). This DEN2V epitope is essen- tially identical to the TBEV defined epitope A1. It has subsequently been determined that the TBEV anti-A1 MAb can also block low-pH-catalyzed cell-membrane fusion mediated by TBEV recombinant subviral particles (RSPs) (Corver et al., 2000; Allison et al., 2001; Stiasny et al., 2002).
TBEV or WNV RSPs with mutations at Leu-107 of the E-glycoprotein have strongly impaired or completely abrogated fusion activity and reduced reactivity of anti-A1 Mabs (Allison et al., 2001; Crill and Chang, 2004). It is unknown whether or not this a.a. is critical for DEN virus- mediated CMF.
1.1.2.2. Nonstructural Proteins
Arthropod-borne flaviviruses encode at least seven nonstructural
(NS) proteins in the 3′ three-quarters of their genome RNA (Rice et al.,
1985). Recent studies have attributed several essential functions in viral
replication to the NS proteins. Knowledge of protein structures,
functions, and interactions could pinpoint vulnerable targets for enzyme
inhibition or disruption of protein–protein interactions. The RNA repli- cation complex includes NS1, NS2A, NS3, NS4A, and NS5 proteins (Westaway et al., 1997, 1999), which are assembled on cytoplasmic mem- branes co- and post-translationally (Khromykh et al., 1998). Nonspecific in vitro RNA synthesis activity can be demonstrated for NS5 (Bartholomeusz and Wright, 1993), which has been shown to form het- erodimers with NS3 (Kapoor et al., 1995). In a yeast 2-hybrid system, a.a.
residues 320–368 of DEN2V NS5 and residues 303–405 in NS3 were shown to mediate protein–protein interactions (Johansson et al., 2001);
however, complementation analysis with KUNV suggested that the N- terminal 316 a.a.s of NS5 and N-terminal 178 a.a.s of NS3 were required for interaction (Liu et al., 2002). The C-terminal two-thirds of the NS5 protein contains the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) activity (Tan et al., 1996), and an N-terminal domain is predicted to be a methyl transferase (Koonin, 1993).
The flavivirus NS1 protein elicits high-titered antibody in fla- vivirus-infected or -immunized animals, but its function in flavivirus replication remains an enigma (Falkler et al., 1973). It has been deter- mined that NS1 immunization or passive transfer of anti-NS1 Mabs can protect animals from viral challenge (Schlesinger et al., 1985, 1986, 1987; Henchal et al., 1988; Iacono-Connors et al., 1996).
The NS3 protein also has multiple functions. Padmanabhan and col- leagues have characterized the serine protease activity of the DEN2V NS3 protein by crystallization of the N-terminal domain (Krishna Murthy et al., 1999). Enzymatic activity was analyzed by introduction of site-specific mutations into cDNA constructs (Valle and Falgout, 1998). The 167 N-terminal a.a. residues constitute the serine protease that carries out NS2A- 2B, 2B-3, 3-4A, and 4B-5 cleavages of the primary polyprotein translation product and secondary cleavages within the C, NS2A, NS3, and NS4A proteins (Krishna Murthy et al., 1999). The catalytic triad residues of DEN2V NS3 protease are His-51, Asp-75, and Ser-135, and additional a.a.
residues have been implicated in specificity. Substrate cleavage sites have
the positively-charged a.a.s Lys-Arg, Arg-Arg, Arg-Lys, and occasionally
Gln-Arg at the P2 and P1 positions, and Gly, Ala, or Ser at the P1′ position
(Krishna Murthy et al., 1999; Murthy et al., 1999). Several different fla-
viviral serine proteases share these structural features and cleavage sites
(Krishna Murthy et al., 1999), suggesting that identification of broad-
spectrum flaviviral replication inhibitors might be possible. Interaction
between NS2B and NS3 is required for membrane association and effi-
cient, specific trans-cleavages by this protease (Clum et al., 1997). A
40-a.a. hydrophilic region on NS2B activates the NS3 protease domain,
and 3 hydrophobic regions are required for membrane insertion of the
complex (Krishna Murthy et al., 1999). NS3 a.a residues 168–188, including a basic a.a-cluster (184-Arg-Lys-Arg-Lys), are required for RNA-stimulated nucleoside triphosphatase activity (Li et al., 1999).
Unwinding of double-stranded RNA in replicative intermediates by the viral helicase, as well as capping during synthesis of the viral genome could require NTPase activity. The C-terminal domain of DENV NS3 con- tains seven motifs characteristic of DExH helicase activity (Li et al., 1999;
Matusan et al., 2001). Matusan et al. mapped a.a. residues required for helicase activity and viral replication by site-specific mutagenesis of a DEN-2 infectious clone (Matusan et al., 2001).
1.1.3. Genetics and Virulence
Strains of WNV can be divided into two genetic lineages (1 and 2) by phylogenetic analysis of the complete genome sequence or of the E-protein gene sequence (Lanciotti et al., 1999, 2002). Major human out- breaks of WNV have been associated only with lineage 1 WNVs. Lineage 2 WNVs apparently maintain themselves in enzootic cycles only, primarily in Africa. Sequencing and analysis of the original North American WNV isolate (NY99) quickly implicated the Middle East as the likely source of the WNV that entered the New York City (NYC) area in 1999 (Briese et al., 1999; Jia et al., 1999; Lanciotti et al., 1999). This genotypic link was fur- ther confirmed by the similar phenotypic characteristics of the NY99 WNV and a strain of WNV isolated from storks in Israel (Lanciotti et al., 1999; Bin et al., 2001; Malkinson et al., 2001, 2002; Banet-Noach et al., 2003, 2004). Both NY99 and Israeli strains of WNV killed birds. Because birds are the primary amplifying and reservoir hosts for WNV, the high mortality in certain birds from these WNV strains was unusual. No other outbreaks of WNV have been associated with high bird mortality, includ- ing the human WNV outbreaks in Romania (1996) and Volgograd (1999) (Han et al., 1999; Platonov et al., 2001).
Mortality has been recorded in more than 280 native and captive
bird species in North America (Petersen and Hayes, 2004). The NY99
strain of WNV appears to be lethal to most birds of the family Corvidae
(crows, ravens, and jays) (Komar et al., 2003a; Brault et al., 2004). The
substantial crow and blue jay mortality has served as the foundation for
the ecological WNV surveillance based on reporting dead birds to public
health officials (Brault et al., 2004; Weingartl et al., 2004; Yaremych et al.,
2004). In addition to corvids, other birds such as raptors also appear to
have high mortality after NY99 WNV infection. The high American crow
mortality rate for the NY99 WNV strain as compared with two other lin-
eage 1 WNV strains (KUN [a subtype of WNV circulating in Australia]
and strain isolated in Kenya [KEN-3829]) has been confirmed in the laboratory (Brault et al., 2004). Four a.a. differences exist between the KEN-3829 and NY99 WNV strains. Two a.a. changes occur in the capsid (a.a.s 3 and 8), and two a.a. changes occur in the envelope protein (a.a.s 126 and 159). The changes in the E-protein occur in domain II and could affect virus-mediated CMF. Further studies using recombination of infec- tious cDNA clones of WNV will better elucidate the significance of these a.a. changes.
As WNV has spread westward across the United States, its genome has remained remarkably stable, with minor temporal and regional varia- tions observed. These variations usually represent less than 0.5% of the genomic sequence and result in only a few a.a. changes in any given iso- late (Beasley et al., 2003; Davis et al., 2003; Blitvich et al., 2004; Davis et al., 2004; Ebel et al., 2004; Granwehr et al., 2004).
1.2. Epidemiology
WNV is one of the most widely distributed of all arboviruses, with an extensive distribution throughout Africa, the Middle East, parts of Europe and the former Soviet Union, South Asia, and Australia (Petersen and Roehrig, 2001; Campbell et al., 2002). The virus had not been detected in North America before a human outbreak of meningitis and encephalitis and an accompanying epizootic in birds in 1999 in the New York City area (Nash et al., 2001).
1.2.1. Ecology
Birds are the primary amplifying hosts, and the virus is maintained in a bird–mosquito–bird cycle primarily involving Culex spp. mosquitoes (Fig. 1.1) (Hubalek and Halouzka, 1999; Hayes, 2001). Humans and other vertebrates, such as horses, do not develop a high level of viremia and, thus, are thought to be incidental hosts who play a minor role in the trans- mission cycle.
1.2.1.1. Vectors
The major mosquito vector in Africa and the Middle East is Cx. uni- vittatus, with Cx. picilipes, Cx. neavei, Cx. decens, Aedes albocephalus, or Mimomyia spp. important in some areas (Hubalek and Halouzka, 1999;
Solomon, 2004). In Europe, Cx. pipiens, Cx. modestus, and Coquillettidia
richiardii are important. In Asia, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Cx. vishnui, and
Cx. quinquefasciatus predominate (Hubalek and Halouzka, 1999).
As of December 2004, surveillance has identified 58 mosquito species infected with WNV in North America (Petersen and Hayes, 2004). WNV and SLEV appear to share the same maintenance vectors, with Cx. pipiens (northern house mosquito) and Cx. restuans the mainte- nance vectors in the northeastern United States and Canada, Cx. quin- quefasciatus (southern house mosquito) the main maintenance vector in the southern United States, and Cx. tarsalis the main maintenance vectors in the western United States and Canada (CDC, 2002d; Solomon, 2004).
Cx. salinarius was implicated in the epidemic on Staten Island in 2000, and, along with Cx. nigripalpus, may be important in Florida (Kulasekera et al., 2001; Blackmore et al., 2003).
Culex spp. mosquitoes are important for their role in overwintering the virus in temperate climates, where they hibernate as adult mosquitoes (CDC, 2000a; Nasci et al., 2001; Bugbee and Forte, 2004). The amplifica- tion cycle begins when infected overwintering mosquitoes emerge in the spring and infect birds. Amplification within the bird–mosquito–bird cycle continues until late summer and fall, when Culex mosquitoes begin diapause and rarely blood-feed. Vertical transmission can occur by an inefficient process in which virus enters the fully formed egg during ovipo- sition (Baqar et al., 1993; Miller et al., 2000; Goddard et al., 2003). The importance of vertical transmission in maintaining the virus is unknown but may be an important mechanism of infection of mosquitoes entering diapause.
In temperate climates, human WNV outbreaks tend to occur dur- ing abnormally hot summers (Cornel et al., 1993). This could occur in part because environmental temperature increases the speed of infection
Incidental hosts
HumansHorses Other mammals
Other mosquito vectors Culex salinarius
Cx. nigripalpus Ochlerotatus sollicitans
Oc. taeniorhynchus Aedes vexans Ae albopictus
?
?
Amplifying hosts
Passerine birdsEnzootic/epizootic (amplifying) vectors Culex pipiens Cx. restuans Cx. quinquefasciatus Cx. tarsalis
Figure 1.1. West Nile virus transmission cycle, North America.
dissemination and WNV titers in newly infected mosquitoes, which, in turn, increases the overall vector competency (Cornel et al., 1993; Dohm and Turell, 2001; Dohm et al., 2002). As with SLEV, other environmental factors that affect host and vector abundance, as well as preexisting levels of immunity in birds, likely play a major role in determining the potential for WNV outbreaks (Day, 2001).
WNV has been isolated from hard (ixodid) and soft (argasid) ticks species in regions of Europe, Africa, and Asia, but it is unclear what role they play in maintaining or disseminating the virus (Platonov, 2001).
A North American argasid tick species (Ornithodorus moubata) was shown to harbor WNV for at least 132 days and was able to infrequently infect rodents (Lawrie et al., 2004).
1.2.1.2. Vertebrate Hosts
Wild birds develop prolonged high levels of viremia and serve as amplifying hosts (Komar et al., 2003a). Passerine birds develop high levels of viremia, are abundant, and become infected in high numbers during epizootics, suggesting that they may be the principal reservoir hosts for WNV (Komar et al., 2001; Komar, 2003; Komar et al., 2003a).
WNV transmission among caged birds suggests that direct transmis- sion from bird to bird may occur (Langevin et al., 2001; Swayne et al., 2001;
McLean et al., 2002; Komar et al., 2003a). The means of this cage mate transmission is unknown; however, the detection of WNV in oral and cloa- cal swabs suggests possible oral transmission (Komar et al., 2002).
In experiments, birds can be infected orally via ingestion of contaminated water, dead birds and mice, and infected mosquitoes (Langevin et al., 2001;
McLean et al., 2002; Komar et al., 2003a). Mathematical models suggest that bird-to-bird transmission has little impact in overall transmission dynamics in nature (Naowarat and Tang, 2004).
More than 21,000 cases of WNV disease in equines were reported from 1999 through 2004 in the United States. Incidence peaked in 2002 and subsequently decreased in 2003 and 2004 after a WNV vaccine became available. Approximately 10% of experimentally infected horses develop clinical illness (Bunning et al., 2002). Clinical series indicate a 20% to 40% mortality among clinically ill horses (Cantile et al., 2000; Porter et al., 2003; Weese et al., 2003; Salazar et al., 2004;
Ward et al., 2004). Age, vaccination status, inability to rise, and female gender are associated with the risk of death (Salazar et al., 2004).
Viremia in horses is low and of short duration; thus, horses are unlikely
to serve as important amplifying hosts for WNV in nature (Bunning
et al., 2001, 2002).
WNV has been isolated or identified serologically in many native and imported vertebrate species in North America, including bats (Pilipski et al., 2004), wolves (Lichtensteiger et al., 2003; Lanthier et al., 2004), eastern fox and gray squirrels (Kiupel et al., 2003; Heinz-Taheny et al., 2004), sheep (Tyler et al., 2003), alligators (Miller et al., 2003;
Klenk et al., 2004), alpacas (Dunkel et al., 2004; Kutzler et al., 2004;
Yaeger et al., 2004), black bears (Farajollahi et al., 2003), a Barbary macaque (Olberg et al., 2004), a Suffolk ewe (Yaeger et al., 2004), rein- deer (Palmer et al., 2004), dogs (Lichtensteiger et al., 2003), and monkeys and baboons (Ratterree et al., 2003).
1.2.2. Geographic Spread 1.2.2.1. United States and Canada
Since its emergence in the New York City area in 1999, the virus has spread rapidly across the United States (Fig. 1.2) (Petersen and Hayes, 2004). In 2004, WNV activity was detected in every continental U.S. state except Washington State. Whereas the southern spread from the New York City area to the southeastern United States was predicted according to bird migration patterns (Lord and Calisher, 1970; Peterson et al., 2003), the means of the virus’ westward spread is less certain and may be due to ran- dom bird dispersal movements (Rappole and Hubalek, 2003).
WNV was first detected in Canada in southern Ontario in 2001 and by 2002 had spread to Manitoba, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Saskatchewan (Drebot et al., 2003). By 2003, the virus’ distribution extended into New Brunswick and Alberta.
1.2.2.2. Latin America
WNV was first detected south of the United States border in 2001,
when a resident of the Cayman Islands developed WNV encephalitis
(CDC, 2002e). In 2002, WNV was isolated from a dead Common Raven
in Tabasco State, Mexico (Estrada-Franco et al., 2003) and in 2003 was
detected by genetic sequencing of cerebellar tissue from a dead horse from
Nuevo Leon State, Mexico (Blitvich et al., 2004) (Table 1.1). Complete
genome sequencing showed that the isolate from Tabasco State in southern
Mexico included 46 nucleotide (0.42%) and 4 amino acid (0.11%) differ-
ences from the NY99 prototype strain (Beasley et al., 2004). Plaque-
purified variants of the isolate with mutations at the E-protein
glycosylation motif had decreased mouse virulence. Phylogenetic analysis
of the genetic sequences from the horse in Nuevo Leon State showed
genetic relatedness to recent isolates from Texas that do not encode muta-
tions at the E glycosylation motif (Blitvich et al., 2004).
Serologic evidence in birds and horses suggests that WNV has circu- lated in the Dominican Republic (Komar et al., 2003b), Jamaica (Dupuis et al., 2003), and Guadeloupe (Quirin et al., 2004), as well as widely in Mexico (Blitvich et al., 2003b; Estrada-Franco et al., 2003; Fernandez- Salas et al., 2003; Lorono-Pino et al., 2003; Marlenee et al., 2004) (Table 1.1). In Mexico and Guadeloupe, a high proportion of tested horses had WNV antibodies. Although sampling was sometimes done in areas where equine mortality from unknown causes had been observed, substantial equine mortality from documented WNV infection has been lacking.
In Guadeloupe, paired samples from horses sampled at an approximate 1-year interval indicated that 47% developed neutralizing antibodies;
1999
2001
2003
.01-9.99 10-99.99 >=100 2004
Human Neuroinvasive Disease Incidence per million
Any WNV Activity (birds, mosquitoes, horses, humans)
20022000
Figure 1.2. West Nile virus in the United States, 1999–2004. The incidence of human neuroinva-
sive disease is indicated by county.
T able 1.1. Pub lished studies of W est Nile vir us in Latin America, 2001–2004 Location Y ear Source T est Comment Reference Ca yman Islands 2001 Human Not described Encephalitis CDC, (2002e) Guadeloupe 2002/2003 Horses IgG and IgM ELISA; F or ty-se v en percent of 114 serocon v er ted (IgG) Quirin et al. (2004) PRNT80 WNV and SLEV betw een Jul y 2002 and Januar y 2003. All ne gati v e b y IgM. Se v en of 10 tested IgG-positi v e horses had WNV -specif ic neutralizing antibody . No clinical illness. Guadeloupe 2002/2003 Chick ens IgG and IgM ELISA; Ele v en of 20 IgG positi v e. All four IgG-positi v e Quirin et al. (2004) PRNT80 WNV and SLEV specimens had WNV -specif ic neutralizing antibody . No clinical illness. Jamaica 2002 Resident and Indirect ELISA; PRNT90 T w enty-se v en of 348 resident birds WNV positi v e. Dupuis et al. (2003) mig rator y birds Ilhéus, SLEV , WNV One of 194 mig rator y birds positi v e. Me xico, 2002 Horses Blocking ELISA; HI SLEV ; Three of 252 WNV positi v e. No clinical illness. Lorono-Pino et al. Y ucatan State PRNT90 Ilhéus, SLEV , (2003) WNV , Bussuquara Me xico, Coahuila 2002 Horses Blocking ELISA; PRNT90 All 5 ill horses WNV positi v e, 6 of 9 from same Blitvich et al. (2003b) State SLEV , WNV ranch as ill horses positi v e, 4 of 10 from other areas positi v e. Me xico, multiple 2002–2003 Horses IgG ELISA, HI SLE F our hundred for ty-one horses from 14 states tested. Estrada-F ranco et al. states and WNV ; PRNT90 Sampling from herds with encephalitic histor y. (2003) SLEV , WNV , VEE Ninety-se v en WNV positi v e from six states. Me xico, 2003 Mig rator y and Blocking ELISA; PRNT90 Three resident and one mig rator y bird positi v e in F er nandez-Salas et al. T amaulipas State resident birds SLEV , WNV captures March 2003. Se v en hundred ninety-six birds (2003) tested from 2001 to 2003. Me xico, T abasco 2003 Bird V ir us isolation Sample from dead common ra v en. Estrada-F ranco et al. State (2003) Me xico, Nue v o 2003 Horses Blocking ELISA; PRNT90 T w enty of 88 horses positi v e. Marlenee et al. (2004) Leon State SLEV , WNV Me xico, Nue v o 2003 Horse V ir us isolation Brain tissue from dead horse. Blitvich et al. (2004) Leon State
WNV, West Nile virus; SLEV, St. Louis encephalitis virus; PRNT80, plaque reduction neutralization test, 80% reduction in number of plaques; PRNT90, plaque reduction neurtralization test, 90% reduction in number of plaques.however, clinical illness was not observed, and IgM antibodies were not detected (Quirin et al., 2004).
1.2.3. Incidence of Human Infection and Illness 1.2.3.1. United States
Despite extensive spread of WNV in nature from 1999 through 2001, human disease was infrequently reported, with only 149 cases reported in the United States during those years (Table 1.2; Fig. 1.2) (CDC, 2000b;
Marfin et al., 2001; Nash et al., 2001; CDC, 2002e; Petersen and Hayes, 2004). However, in 2002, a multistate outbreak throughout the Midwest resulted in more than 4000 reported cases, of whom 2946 had reported neuroinvasive disease (Table 1.2; Fig. 1.2) (O’Leary et al., 2004). This out- break was epidemiologically similar to a 1975 outbreak of SLEV, which involved approximately 2000 persons (Creech, 1977). In 2003, nearly 10,000 cases were reported, of whom 2866 had neuroinvasive disease.
Wider availability of commercial WNV antibody detection assays resulted in increased diagnosis and reporting of patients with WN fever in 2003;
however, the similar number of neuroinvasive disease cases reported in 2002 and 2003 indicated that both outbreaks were of similar magnitude (Table 1.2) (Petersen and Hayes, 2004). The incidence of WNV neuroinva- sive disease was lower in 2004 compared with the two previous years (Table 1.2), with approximately one-third of the cases reported from California and Arizona (Fig. 1.2).
Serological surveys indicate that even in areas experiencing out- breaks, less than 5% of the population has been exposed to the virus (Tsai et al., 1998; CDC, 2001; Mostashari et al., 2001; Petersen and Hayes, 2004). Based on the 6849 reported cases of WNV neuroinvasive disease from 1999 through 2004 and the estimated proportions of infected persons
Table 1.2. Total number of reported cases of WNV disease and number of cases with neuroinvasive disease, United States, 1999–2004
Year Total cases Neuroinvasive cases Fatalities
1999 62 54 7
2000 21 19 2
2001 66 64 9
2002 4156 2946 284
2003 9862 2866 264
2004 2539 1142 128
Total 16,706 7091 694
who develop WN fever and WNV neuroinvasive disease, approximately 1 million persons have become infected with the WNV in the United States, of whom approximately 190,000 have become ill (Petersen and Hayes, 2004). Through 2004, more than 690 deaths have been reported (Petersen and Hayes, 2004), with a fatality rate of approximately 10%
among persons with neuroinvasive disease.
Human WNV infection incidence increases in early summer and peaks in August or early September (Fig. 1.3). However, an outbreak in Phoenix, Arizona, in 2004 began in May and peaked in late June and early July. In the United States, within large regional WNV epidemics, the inci- dence of human disease varies markedly from county to county, suggest- ing the importance of local ecological conditions (Fig. 1.2).
1.2.3.2. Canada
The first cases of human WNV disease in Canada occurred in 2002, with 426 reported illnesses and 20 deaths reported from Quebec and Ontario. In 2003, 1494 cases were reported, of whom 217 had neuroinvasive disease and 10 died. In 2004, there were only 26 reported cases, of whom 13 had neuroinvasive disease; none died. These inci- dences parallel those in the northern United States.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
5-Apr19-Apr3-May17-May31-May14-Jun28-Jun12-Jul26-Jul9-Aug23-Aug6-Sep20-Sep4-Oct18-Oct1-Nov15-Nov29-Nov13-Dec
Date of symptom onset
Cases of neuroinvasive disease
2002 2003 2004