• Non ci sono risultati.

APPENDIX 1

N/A
N/A
Info
Scarica
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "APPENDIX 1"

Copied!
1
0
0

Caricamento.... (Visualizza il testo completo ora)

Scarica adesso ( 1 pagine )

Testo completo

(1)

APPENDIX 1a

Whole colony counts of Common Murres in Washington (except Tatoosh Island) by date, 1996-2015b

Colony complex 1/7/15 30/6/14 2/7/13 6/6/12 8/6/11 11/6/10 1/7/01 2/7/00 1/7/99 6/7/98 10/7/97 28/7/96

White-Bodeltehs 10,096 6,000 3,633 291 0 0 0 0 325 85 0 60

Carroll-Jagged 1 3,774 4,554 2,901 890 4,163 0 0 0 2,810 1,655 1,915

Quillayute Needles 1,784 7,253 6,735 6,510 0 5,140 2,045 480 265 775 65 3,910

Other Locations 0 0 18 0 29 0 0 0 150 0 45 0

Northern Washington 11,881 17,027 14,940 9,702 919 9,303 2,045 480 740 3,670 1,765 5,825

Split-Willoughby 0 0 0 0 0 0 140 0 15 290 0 5

Point Grenville 198 133 0 0 0 1 1,050 0 320 1,960 485 830

Southern Washington 198 133 0 0 0 1 1,190 0 335 2,250 485 835

Washington total 12,079 17,160 14,940 9,702 919 9,304 3,235 480 1,075 5,920 2,250 6,660

a THOMAS, S.M. & LYONS, J.E. 2017. Population trends and distribution of Common Murre (Uria aalge) colonies in Washington, 1996–2015. Marine Ornithology

bData sources: WMNWRC - 2010-2015 & 1999-2001 data available via lead author; data from 1996-1998 from the Tenyo Maru Trustee council online at https://casedocuments.darrp.noaa.gov/northwest/tenyo/admin.html).

Riferimenti

Scarica adesso ( DOCX - 1 pagine - 14.25 KB )

Documenti correlati

Hatching success of Common Murres Uria aalge is linked to the number of neighbours and resource availability

Specifically, we predict that breeding sites on Funk Island will have fewer neighbours, as non-breeding murres and non-brooding/incubating mates must spend more time at sea due

Spatial effects in relation to reproductive performance of Common Murres Uria aalge at a re-established colony

For each of the murre reproductive success parameters, we used logistic regressions to model the outcomes of individual breeding sites in relation to multiple predictors

APPENDIX 1 Summary of

FMNH = Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL; HSU = Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA; Illinois State Museum, Springfield, IL; KU = University of Kansas

POPULATION TRENDS AND DISTRIBUTION OF COMMON MURRE URIA AALGE COLONIES IN WASHINGTON, 1996–2015

We assessed murre population trends and changes in the spatial distribution of breeding colonies on National Wildlife Refuge islands along the outer coast of Washington

ASSESSING THE BREEDING DISTRIBUTION AND POPULATION TRENDS OF THE ALEUTIAN TERN ONYCHOPRION ALEUTICUS

Trends at known colonies within discrete geographic regions of Alaska (Aleutian Islands, Bering Sea, Chukchi Sea, Gulf of Alaska and Kodiak Island) were consistently negative..

APPENDIX 1. Summary of count data from known Aleutian Tern colonies in Alaska

Magadan, Institute for Biological Problems of the North, Far East Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, p.. Ornithological observations of the seabird colonies of Eastern

1 Appendix 1. Summary of active (2006) and otherwise-known BRPE breeding colonies for the Southern California Bight (SCB) subpopulation

1--Since the recovery of SCB BRPE after the mid-1970s from DDE-related pollution problems (Anderson et al. 1975), most nesting of BRPE has occurred at West Anacapa and Santa Barbara

Comparison of Capelin Mallotus villosus in the prey loads of Common Murres Uria aalge and Northern Gannets Morus bassanus foraging from the same breeding site in the northwest Atlantic

Owing to their foraging capabilities and CPF constraints, we expected less diversity in the prey deliveries of murre parents compared with the prey-loads of non-breeding gannets