Angela V. Olinto
The University of Chicago
Voyager 1 and 2 leave the Heliosphere
Ed Stone & Voyager
The Great Voyage
1977 to now and onwards...
William H. Gerstenmaier Associate Administrator HEOMD, NASA
Precision
Exploration
The HE* Physics Journey
2013,
H
0*Particle & Astroparticle
The (Astro)Particle Physics Journey
2013,
H
0Journey toward Planck
Journey through the Desert toward Planck
1013 eV 14 o.o.m. 1027 eV
eV
-12 x 10
-5cm
10 -9cm 10 -12cm 10 -15cm 10 -18cm 10 -21cm 10 -24cm 10 -27cm 10 -30cm 10 -33cm
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
eV cm
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon6 x 108 cm 50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon6 x 108 cm 50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon6 x 108 cm 50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
Precision
Exploration
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
6 x 108 cm
Precision
Exploration
LHC
Precision
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
6 x 108 cm
Precision
Exploration
LHC
Exploration Precision
IceCube ν Aug er/T A
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
6 x 108 cm
Precision
Exploration
LHC
Exploration Precision
IceCube ν Aug er/T A ARA/ EV A JEM -EUSO
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
6 x 108 cm
Precision
Exploration
LHC
Exploration Precision
IceCube ν Aug er/T A ARA /EV A JEM -EUSO
The Most Energetic
Cosmic Particles
1937: Pierre Auger ~ 10
15eV
Extensive Air Showers
1962 John Linsley
~ 10
20eV event
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays
AAS meeting 1/5/14 Angela Olinto 20
GammaRays
Cosmic Rays
Neutrinos
~ double the energy range for Astrophysics
High Energy Particles
Proton, Helium, heavier nuclei
~1%
Gamma-ray ~ 0.1%
IceCube Neutrinos
PhysPAG 8/14/12 23 Angela Olinto 23
Solar
Influence Galactic Cosmic Rays Extragalactic Cosmic Rays
PhysPAG 8/14/12 24 Angela Olinto 24
Solar Influenc
e
Galactic Cosmic Rays Extragalactic Cosmic Rays
Ground Experiments
Space
Experiments
PhysPAG 8/14/12 25 Angela Olinto 25
Solar Influenc
e
Galactic Cosmic Rays Extragalactic Cosmic Rays
Voyager I & II
ACE/CRIS PAMELA
AMS
Satellites ISS
Space Missions Now
Super- TIGER
Balloon
PhysPAG 8/14/12 26 Angela Olinto 26
Solar Influenc
e
Galactic Cosmic Rays Extragalactic Cosmic Rays
Voyager I & II
ACE/CRIS PAMELA
AMS
Satellites ISS
ISS-CREAM
JEM-EUSO
CALET
HN X
SmEx
Space Missions Future
EVA Balloon
PhysPAG 8/14/12 27 Angela Olinto 27
Solar Influenc
e
Galactic Cosmic Rays Extragalactic Cosmic Rays NOW
Ground Experiments
ankle knee
ankle knee
ankle knee
500 TeV
10
20eV
31
A. Watson
ankle knee
Sources?
33
Super-novae
Cosmic Rays from Super-novae Baade & Zwicky (1934)
Blasi & Amato 2012 34
Supernova Remnants
to 1017eV
Vladimir Ptuskin
π 0 decay!
Ackermann et al (Fermi Collab) ’13 arXiv:1302.3307
IC 443 & W44 Fermi & AGILE
π0 decay
ankle knee
Galactic Sources
PhysPAG 8/14/12 36
~1%
Galactic Supernova Remnants
ankle knee
Extragalactic Sources
Galactic Sources
PhysPAG 8/14/12 37
~1%
Galactic Supernova Remnants
ankle knee
Extragalactic Sources
Galactic Sources
?
Galactic – Extragalactic Transition
39
Heavy
Light
ankle knee
Extragalactic Sources
Galactic Sources
New light Component
ankle knee
ankle
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays
E > 1018 eV
= 1 EeV
ankle knee
1 km
-2yr
-10.1 km
-2century
-11 m
-2yr
-1Current Observatories of
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays
Pierre Auger Observatory
Mendoza, Argentina (19 country collaboration)
3,000 km
2array
4 fluorescence telescopes
Telescope Array
Utah, USA (5 country
collaboration)
700 km
2array
3 fluorescence
telescopes
Pierre Auger Observatory
~ 500 Scientists, 19 Countries
3,000 km2 water cherenkov detectors array
4 fluorescence Telescopes, Malargue, Argentina
Telescope Array
3 FD stations overlooking an array of 507 scintillator surface detectors (SD)
Area: 700 km2
Belgium Japan Korea
Russia USA
45
46
~175000 events
from 32,000 km2 sr y
A. Watson
CERN UHECR 2012 Working Group
Unified Spectrum
Dawson et al ‘13 47
Energies re-scaled ~10%
48
49
50
ankle knee
GZK
“Cosmologically Meaningful Termination”
GZK Cutoff
Greisen, Zatsepin, Kuzmin 1966
p+
cmb
+ p +
0 n +
+Proton Horizon
~5 x 10
19eV
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin effect
53
Kotera & AO 11
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin effect
Gpc
~100 Mpc
~10 Mpc
54
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin effect
Gpc
~100 Mpc
~10 Mpc
56
Isotropic Isotropic Anisotropic Anisotropic
Propagation of UHE protons
Berezinsky, Gazizov, Grigoriev ‘05
Modification factor
Spectrum Recovery
CERN UHECR 2012 Working Group
Unified Spectrum
Dawson et al ‘13 58
Energies re-scaled ~10%
Kotera, AO ‘11 To fit the spectrum, need:
SOURCE MODEL
+
PROPAGATION
Modern Propagation Codes
Public:
CRPropa
1.0 Armengaud et al ‘06 2.0 Kampert et al. ’12 3.0 Alvez Batista et al ’13 SimProp
Aloisio et al ’12
Private:
Allard et al ’04 Taylor ’07
Ahlers ‘10 others...
Interaction Cross Sections, z evolution Background Fields: CMB, UV/Opt/IR Primary, Secondary nuclei, nucleons, e+e-, gamma-rays, neutrinos,...
InterGal Magnetic Fields
Modern Propagation
Codes
Source Model:
•injection spectrum: E-s
•injected composition
•redshift distribution
Propagation Codes
Source Model:
•injection spectrum: E-s
•injected composition
•redshift distribution
Propagation Codes
Source redshift evolution
Source Model:
•injection spectrum: E-s
•injected composition
•redshift distribution
Propagation Codes
Spectrum
Anisotropies
Composition
Multi-messengers
Kotera, AO 2011
injection spectrum: E-s, Emax injection composition
Transition Gal/Extragal model
Source evolution: FRII, SFR, uniform
Kotera, AO 2011
UHECRs Current Status
Leading Observatories: Auger & Telescope Array agree on the shape of the spectrum Energy scale: ~10% difference
Composition?
67
68
Composition observable:
shower maximum
average and fluctuations
70
See Dembinski
71
See Dembinski
Fe
p O He
Auger
TA
Telescope Array
Auger sees change slope:
Change in Composition or interactions
TA: not confirmed yet
72
Xmax in the atmosphere
Xmax in the detector
GZK ?
(TA ICRC11)
Kotera, AO ‘11 73
GZK or E max ?
(TA ICRC11)
Kotera, AO ‘11 Fang, Kotera, AO ‘13
74
GZK vs E max
(TA ICRC11)
Kotera, AO ‘11
Fang, Kotera, AO ‘13
75
LHC white dwarf
Kotera & AO‘11
LHC
white dwarf
Hillas Plot: E max required
LHC white dwarf
Kotera & AO‘11
LHC
white dwarf
Hillas Plot: E max required
Birth of ultrafast spinning
Pulsars
Young Neutron Stars & Magnetars
Closed Line Open Lines
Blasi, Epstein & AVO ’00, Arons ‘03 M ~1 Msolar R~10km compact stars
born Fast spinning (P<< 300 ms)
– slows down due to magnetic breaking (and gravitational radiation early on) born B ~ 1012-13 G
Ω
Birth of ultrafast Pulsars
Newborn Pulsar with:
At the light cylinder:
Magnetic wind can accelerate particles up to
Spectrum too hard:
Blasi, Epstein, AVO ‘00
Maximum Energy?✔
Spectrum is hard ~ E-1
Escape from Supernova Remnant :
maximum 104.2/s
maximum 104.2/s
Fang, Kotera, AVO ‘12
softens the spectrum bet protons and iron + pulsar distribution & propagation
Fast Spinning Newborn Pulsars fit Spectrum !
Fang, Kotera, AVO ‘13
Fast Spinning Newborn Pulsars fit Spectrum & Auger Composition !
Fang, Kotera, AVO ‘13
Galactic Newborn Pulsars?
Fang, Kotera, AVO ‘13
Galactic Cosmic Rays
Amato & Blasi ‘12
fill the gap
Fang, Kotera, AVO ‘13
Multi-messenger Predictions
Fang, Kotera, Murase, AVO ‘13 86
UHECRs Current Status
Leading Observatories: Auger & Telescope Array agree on the shape of the spectrum Energy scale: ~10% difference
Composition: controversial Multi-messenger clues
87
Cosmogenic (GZK, BZ*) Neutrinos & Photons
p+
cmb
+ p +
0 γγ n +
+n p + e
-+
e
+
++
+ e
++
e+
Berezinsky & Zatsepin ‘69
Neutrino Detectors
Flux Lower Limit
Current Limits
Highest Energy Neutrino
Observatories
IceCube ANITA
ANTARES
Next Generation UHE
from Vieregg CSS13
Neutrino Detectors
Next Generation (ARA)
Flux Lower Limit
Current Limits
PhysPAG 8/14/12 93 Angela Olinto 93
Solar Influenc
e
Galactic Cosmic Rays Extragalactic Cosmic Rays
Voyager I & II
ACE/CRIS PAMELA
AMS
Satellites ISS
ISS-CREAM
JEM-EUSO
CALET
HN X
SmEx
Space Missions Future
EVA Balloon
94 APS meeting 1/14/15
P. Gorham CosmicSIG
EVA
95
P. Gorham CosmicSIG
P. Picozza
AAS meeting 1/5/14 Angela Olinto 97
P. Picozza
98
AAS meeting 1/5/14 Angela Olinto 99
23 days Super Pressure Balloon = SPB
http://www.csbf.nasa.gov/map/balloon9/flight662nt.htm
UHECRs Current Status
Leading Observatories: Auger & Telescope Array agree on the shape of the spectrum Energy scale: ~10% difference
Composition: controversial
Multi-messenger clues: not yet
Anisotropies?
101
No Galactic Plane Anisotropy
E>20 EeV Cosmic Rays are EXTRAGALACTIC
Auger Anisotropy limits: rule out Galactic protons to CNO as dominant CR component E > 1 EeV and Fe above 20 EeV
102 102
Giacinti et al ‘11
ankle knee
ankle
Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Rays
E > 1018 eV
= 1 EeV
ankle
Extragalactic
Cosmic Magnetic Fields
Halo B?
Extra-galactic B?
B < nG
weak deflection RL = kpc Z-1 (E / EeV) (B / G)-1
RL = Mpc Z-1 (E / EeV) (B / nG)-1
kpc 10 kpc
strong deflection
Milky way B ~ G
E > 1019eV
E < 1018eV
“Known unknown”
1 EeV = 1018 eV
Galactic B deflection
<< 10o Z (40 EeV/E) anisotropic in sky
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin effect
Gpc
~100 Mpc
~10 Mpc
105
Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin effect
Gpc
~100 Mpc
~10 Mpc
106
Isotropic Isotropic Anisotropic Anisotropic
108
109
Correlation has fallen from ~ 68% to ~ 28% (2007 –> 2014) compared with 21% for isotropy: about 1.4% probablity Cen A may be a source: in 13º circle around: 12 seen/1.7
A clear message from the Pierre Auger Observatory:-
We made it too small (2 per month at energy of interest)
A. Watson
Anisotropy Hints > 60 EeV
E > 5.7x 1019 eV 20o smoothing
Auger Observatory
≈ 3 σ pretrial
Telescope Array
Anisotropy Hints > 60 EeV
E > 5.7x 1019 eV 20o smoothing ≈ 5 σ pretrial
Telescope Array
Soon to be announced!
Anisotropy Hints > 60 EeV
E > 5.7x 1019 eV 20o smoothing ≈ 5 σ pretrial
Telescope Array
Auger Observatory
≈ 3 σ pretrial
overlap
Anisotropy Hints > 60 EeV
IceCube 37 Events
Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 101101 (2014) 114
3 yr data; 30 TeV to 2 PeV
115
116
117
118
Neutrino & UHECR Coincidence
Fang, Fujii, Linden, AO ‘14
~2σ
Anisotropy Hints > 60 EeV
E > 5.7x 1019 eV 20o smoothing ≈ 5 σ pretrial
Statistically limited
Telescope Array
Auger Observatory
≈ 3 σ pretrial
overlap
Anisotropy Hints > 60 EeV
Statistically limited
A clear message from the Pierre Auger Observatory:-
We made it too small (2 per month at energy of interest)
A. Watson
121
Nadir
Fluorescence from SPACE
Tilt
122
Tilt
Nadir John Linsley
(1925-2002)
123
JEM-EUSO
Japan, USA, Korea, Mexico, Russia, Algeria
Europe: Bulgaria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Sweden
16 Countries, 300 researchers Leading institution: RIKEN
PI: Piergiorgio Picozza
JEM-EUSO Mission
Extreme Universe Space Observatory (EUSO)
in the Japanese Experiment Module (JEM)
of the International Space Station (ISS)
125
JEM-EUSO goals
- pioneer the study of EECR from Space - increase exposure to EECR by 1 order of magnitude
- discover the nearby sources of UHECRs
126
Rear Fresnel Lens
Iris
Front Fresnel lens DAQ Electronics
Support Structure
Focal Surface Detector
Optics
Payload
Precision Fresnel lens
Housekeeping
On-board Calibration
Atmospheric Monitoring BUS System : JAXA
Ground Based Calibration
Simulation : Worldwide
Ground Support Equipment Telescope Structure
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
Full Sky Coverage
with nearly uniform exposure
http://www.nlsa.com/
Inclination: 51.6°
Height: ~400km
The ISS ORBIT
JEM-EUSO Sky Coverage
134
JEM-EUSO
135
annual exposure = 10 x Auger 6 104 km2 sr yr
ZeV neutrinos?
136
109 eV 1012 eV 1015 eV 1018 eV 1021eV 1024eV 1027eV
109 cm 1012 cm 1015 cm 1018 cm 1021 cm 1024 cm 1027 cm
GeV TeV PeV EeV ZeV YeV XeV
R
Earthd
Earth-Moon50pc ~ 1015 cm
Solar System
4 x 1011 cm Near Stars 1 pc = 3 1018 cm
1 AU = 1.5 x 1013 cm 1 kpc = 3 1021 cm 1Mpc = 3 1024 cm 1Gpc = 3 1021 cm
Milky Way thickness
Near Galaxies
Our Neighborhood of the Universe
6 x 108 cm
Precision
Exploration
LHC
Exploration Precision
IceCube ν Aug er/T A ARA /EV A JEM -EUSO
Super Heavy Dark Matter
138
Aloisio, Matarrese, AO ‘15
JEM-EUSO ARA
β inflaton potential
SHDM
Mass scale given by r
Lifetime given by EECRs
Aloisio, Matarrese, AO ‘15
Super Heavy Dark Matter
140
Aloisio, Matarrese, AO ‘15
141
NASA
Astrophysics Roadmap
2014
How many UHECRs > 60 EeV?
Auger + TA ~30 events/yr
JEM-EUSO
~200 events > 60 EeV/yr
Earth - surface ~ 5 10
8km
2~3.4 10
6events/yr
142
Monitored Area
» few ´ 10
12tons
JEM-EUSO: Extreme Universe Space Observatory onboard Japanese Experiment Module
~ 4 ~
JEUSO-110025-01-E-TR-ZZZ
since the mean distance to EAS and atmospheric absorption both increase. First few years of the then later to
Figure 1-2. Artistic illustration of the JEM-EUSO telescope attached to the Japanese Experiment Module of the International Space Station, under nadir (left) and tilt (right) mode of observation.
The JEM-EUSO telescope can reconstruct the incoming direction of the EECRs with accuracy better than few degrees. Its observational aperture of the ground area is a circle with 250 km radius, and its atmospheric volume above it, with a 60° FoV, is ~1 Tera-ton or more. The target volume for upward neutrino events exceeds 10 Tera-tons. The instantaneous aperture of JEM- EUSO is larger than the Pierre Auger Southern Observatory by a factor ranging from 65 to 280, depending on its observation mode (nadir or tilted, Fig.1-3).
JEM-EUSO, planned to be attached to JEM/EF of ISS, will be launched in the JFY 2016 by H2B rocket and conveyed to ISS by HTV (H-II transfer Vehicle).
Figure 1-3. Area observed by the JEM-EUSO telescope in one shot under mode.
How many UHECRs > 60 EeV?
Auger + TA ~30 events/yr
JEM-EUSO
~200 events > 60 EeV/yr
Earth - surface ~ 5 10
8km
2~3.4 10
6events/yr
144
146
Extreme Energy Frontier Mysteries to be Resolved from Space!
Thanks!
Extreme Energy Frontier Mysteries to be
Resolved from Space!
Thanks!
149
150
151
152
Shower Simulation
64 pixel MAPMT
1020eV 60 deg
Detected photoelectrons are recorded every Gate Time Unit (GTU) of 2.5s continuously.
Simulated air shower image on the focal surface detector.
2x1020eV 65 deg
153
154 154
GLS
12 stations:
12 with Xe Flashlamps 6 with Steered Lasers 1 airborne System