• Non ci sono risultati.

Cosa dicono le linee guida

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Cosa dicono le linee guida"

Copied!
24
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

I

L FOLLOW

-

UP ONCOLOGICO

:

DALLA TEORIA ALLA PRATICA PRIMO CONSENSUS REGIONALE

IV sessione: carcinoma del polmone Cosa dicono le linee guida

Palmanova, 14 Maggio 2016 Dr.ssa Elena Poletto, Udine

(2)

N ON S MALL C ELL L UNG C ANCER

Lung cancer is responsible for 23% of total cancer deaths in men and 11% in women globally

Jemal A et al, 2012

Less than 20% of patients with new lung cancer diagnosis have disease amenable to curative treatment

Jemal A et al, 2008

Poor 5-year overall survival

Goldstraw et al, 2015

(3)

N ON S MALL C ELL L UNG C ANCER

From 20% to 40% of patients who underwent a complete resection for stage IA-IIB develop a locoregional or distant recurrence

Winton T, N Engl J Med, 2005 Lou F et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013

Increase of the risk for secondary primary cancer from 1% to 3% per patient per year during the first 3 years

Lou F et al, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013

Recurrence peaks around 9 months and at the end of 2nd and 4th year after first diagnosis

De Michel R et al, J Thor Oncol, 2013

(4)

NSCLC FOLLOW - UP : WHY

To manage complication related to the curative intent therapy

To detect symptomatic or asymptomatic recurrence of primary lung cancer

To detect new primary lung cancer to allow potentially curative retreatment

Surveillance for second smoking related primary tumor (eg.

head & neck, bladder…)

Life-style raccomandations:

Smoking cessation

Counselling for wellness and health promotion

Cancer screening

(5)

NSCLC FOLLOW - UP : WHY

The main goal is to identify early recurrence in order to improve

survival

(6)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

WHY

Several studies showed that intensive follow-up vs symptoms based follow-up did not improve overall survival

Younes et al, Chest 1999 Walsh GL et al Ann Thorac Surg 1995

Other studies showed that intensive follow-up is effective: patients with asymptomatic recurrence have better overall survival

Westeel et al Ann Thorac Surg 2000

(7)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

NEED OF A CONSENSUS

Decreto Lorenzin

(8)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

: W

HAT GUIDELINES SAY

Physical examination

Instrumental exams

Chest Xray

Chest-abdomen CT scan

CT/PET

Brain CT/MRI scan

Blood test

Other indications…

(9)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

PHYSICAL EXAMINATION

Time from

diagnosis AIOM ESMO ACCP NCCN

<3 years Every 3-6 moths

Every 6 month

Every 6 months

Every 3-6 months

>3 years Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly

(10)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

CHEST

CT

SCAN

Time from

diagnosis AIOM ESMO ACCP NCCN

<2 years Every 6 months

Every 6 months

Every 6 months

Every 6 months

> 2 years Yearly Yearly Yearly Yearly

(11)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

BLOOD TEST

Organization Summary racommendations

AIOM Not reported

ESMO Not reported

ACCP Not recommended

NCCN Not reported

(12)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

TUMOR MARKERS

Organization Summary recommendations

AIOM Not recommended

ESMO Not reported

ACCP Not recommended

NCCN Not reported

(13)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

: CT/PET

SCAN AND BRAIN IMAGING

Organization Summary recommendations

AIOM Not recommended in asymptomatic patients

ESMO Not recommended

ACCP Not recommended in asymptomatic patients

NCCN Not recommended in asymptomatic patients

(14)

NSCLC FOLLOW - UP : BRONCOSCOPY

AIOM:

After 1 year

High risk for stump recurrence:

tumor-free bronchus margin <1 cm or nodal disease

with bronchial dysplasia or carcinoma in situ

ESMO: not reported

ACCP:

Every 3 months during first year then every 6 months until 5 years from curative treatment

Patients with early central airway squamous cell

NCCN: not reported

(15)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

SURVIVORSHIP CARE

AIOM, ESMO, ACCP and NCCN all suggest:

Smoking cessation

AIOM and NCCN:

Annual influenza and pneumococcal vaccination

Counselling for wellness and health promotion

Cancer screening

(16)

NSCLC

FOLLOW UP GUIDELINES AND

«D

ECRETO

L

ORENZIN

»

Physical examination: not included/reported

Chest CT scan: not included/reported

Brain CT/MRI scan: not included/reported

Broncoscopy: not included/reported

CT/PET: allowed for

dd between tumor recurrence and post-RT fibrosis;

restaging in case of clinical-instrumental recurrence suspicion

(17)

NSCLC

FOLLOW UP GUIDELINES AND

«D

ECRETO

L

ORENZIN

»

Blood test:

AST/ALT → routinely not indicated; only if hepatic disease suspected

Alkaline phosphatase: → routinely not indicated; only if cholestatic hepatic or bone disease suspected

Sodium/potassium: → routinely not indicated; only if renal disease or electrolyte disorders suspected

Calcium: → indicated for diagnosis and screening

Markers:

CEA, CA 19.9: allowed for monitoring disease

(18)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

A CONSENSUS PROPOSAL

I (ADJ) - III; IV NED, AFTER CURATIVE TREATMENT

Time from diagnosis

Physical examination

Imaging

Chest/abdomen CT scan

Blood test

6 months x x x

12 months x x x

18 months x x x

24 months x x x

30 months x x x

36 months x x x

42 months

48 months x x x

54 months

60 months x x x

< 60 months Consider follow up by General Practicioner

(19)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

A CONSENSUS PROPOSAL

STAGE IV AFTER FIRST LINE TREATMENT

Time from diagnosis

Physical examination

Imaging

Chest/abdomen CT scan

Blood test

4 months x x x

8 months x x x

12 months x x x

18 months x x x

24 months x x x

30 months x x x

36 months

Follow-up as for stage I-III disease 42 months

48 months 54 months 60 months

< 60 months

(20)

O

THER RACCOMANDATIONS

:

Education for early detection of suspicious symptoms

Smoking cessation

Promotion of healthy lifestyle

Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination

Reccomend cancer screening program adhesion (eg mammography, PAP test, fecal blood test…)

Broncoscopy after 12 months from surgery if central tumors and/or tumor-free bronchus margin <1 cm or bronchial dysplasia/carcinoma in situ

NOT INDICATED:

Tumor markers (eg CEA)

Abdomen ultrasound

18FDG CT/PET

Brain CT/MRI scan

Echocardiography

(21)

NSCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

:

OPEN QUESTIONS

Stage IV NSCLC NED: same follow-up as stage I-III disease?

Which follow up for abnormal chest CT scan findings?

Role of multidisciplinary team:

should stage I-II NSCLC followed by surgeons?

Role of the radiotherapist in case of combined CT-RT treatment?

Is reasonable continuation of follow up by general practioner after 5 years from NSCLC treatment?

Is reasonable to tailor follow up according to patients’ comorbidity and chances to receive other curative treatments?

(22)

SCLC

FOLLOW

-

UP

5 years survival 4,8%

Is follow up useful?

Follow-up goal: to detect recurrence early while the patient still has a good PS

ESMO/NCCN guidelines:

CT-scans every 2-3 months in patients with metastatic disease potentially qualifyng for further treatment

CT-scans every 3-6 month for 2 years in patient with

localized disease who have received potentially curative treatment

Smoking cessation

(23)

N EUROENDOCRINE BRONCHIAL TUMORS

Typical and atypical carcinoid

Patient treated with curative intent:

Long follow-up up to 15 years from diagnosis

Tumor biomarker (chromogranin A and NSE) every 3-6 months

CT scan every 2-3 years for typical carcinoid and yearly for atypical

Patient with metastatic disease:

CT scan and tumor biomarkers every 3-6 months during systemic treatment

(24)

T

HANKS FOR THE ATTENTION

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Phage Display Technology Confirms the Intestinal Production of Anti-TG2 Antibodies in Non-CD Patients To confirm the intestinal production of anti-TG2 antibodies in positive

14 More than 90% of individuals with idio- pathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder eventually develop a synuclein-related neurodegenerative disease, usually Parkinson

Department of General Surgery Santa Croce e Carle Hospital Cuneo, Italy. A LFONSO DEL

· In addition, sentinel node labeling is only of in- terest in cases with differentiated cancers, which means not in cancer cases with diffuse extra- thyroidal invasive

Cancer may complicate the course of any interstitial lung disease, including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, sarcoidosis, progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), Langer- hans

The objectives of the study were as following: to describe the average waiting time (in days) from diagnosis until surgical treatment in the newly breast cancer patients in

The major findings of the present study are: (1) Patients with end-stage lung disease have an autonomic imbalance in the direction of higher sympathetic and lower vagal modulation

Le difficoltà poste dalla notevole difformità nelle modalità di costruzione e esposizione delle linee guida sono puntualmente esposte nel documento, insieme alla raccomanda- zione