• Non ci sono risultati.

Temi aperti sui trattamenti adiuvanti: Malattia Her 2+

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Temi aperti sui trattamenti adiuvanti: Malattia Her 2+"

Copied!
34
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Alessandra Gennari S.C. Oncologia Medica E.O. Ospedali Galliera Genova

Temi aperti sui

trattamenti adiuvanti:

Malattia Her 2+

(2)

Anti HER2 Adjuvant Therapy Challenges with Evidence

 De-escalation of anti HER2 therapy

- non inferiority RCTs

 Combination vs Sequence

- Trastuzumab + Lapatinib - Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab - Trastuzumab Neratinib

 Biosimilars

- Equivalence trials

(3)

9 weeks vs 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy: results of the phase III multicentric

Italian Short-HER study

PF Conte, G. Bisagni, A. Frassoldati, A. Brandes, E. Anselmi, F. Giotta, M. Aieta, V. Gebbia, A. Musolino, O. Garrone, C. Taverniti, G. Cavazzini, A. Turletti, D. Rubino, A. Ferro, E. Picardo, F. Piacentini, S. Balduzzi, R. D'Amico, V. Guarneri

Medical Oncology 2, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IRCCS DiSCOG-University of Padova, Italy

On behalf of the Short-HER Study Team

Courtesy of PF Conte

(4)

Short-HER: Study Design

Stratification factors: HR status, Nodal status

Courtesy of PF Conte

(5)

Total planned amount of chemotherapy and trastuzumab in the two treatment arms

Long Short

Presented by: PierFranco Conte, ASCO 2017

Courtesy of PF Conte

(6)

Short-HER: Disease Free Survival

0.000.250.500.751.00

626 601 576 554 476 351 233 120 46

B short

627 608 592 566 482 374 239 132 43

A long Number at risk

0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96

Months from randomization

A long B short

Presented by: PierFranco Conte, ASCO 2017

Courtesy of PF Conte

(7)

Presented by: PierFranco Conte

DFS – Subgroup analysis

Age

<60 years 123/802

≥60 years 66/451

Stage

I 52/509 II 81/549 III 56/191

Nodal status

N0 73/670 N1 56/385 N2+N3 60/198

Hormone-receptor

Negative 71/398 Positive 118/855

1.14 (0.85, 1.54) 1.18 (0.78, 1.76)

0.91 (0.57, 1.44) 0.96 (0.66, 1.38) 1.76 (1.11, 2.80)

0.91 (0.62, 1.33) 0.93 (0.60, 1.45) 2.07 (1.33, 3.22)

1.20 (0.81, 1.78) 1.12 (0.83, 1.52)

HR (90% CI) Events/randomized

1

.5 .75 1 1.5 2.5 3.5

Favouring SHORT Favouring LONG

Ratio of HRs (90%CI)

p- value Stage

III vs I+II

2.30

(1.35, 3.94) <

0.001 Nodal status

N2+N3 vs N0+N1

2.25

(1.33, 3.83) < 0.001

Courtesy of PF Conte

(8)

Short-HER: Overall Survival

Presented by: PierFranco Conte

Long (N=627)

Short (N=626)

OS events # 37 38

5y OS % 95.1 95.0

HR (90% CI)

1.06 (0.73-1.55)

0.000.250.500.751.00

626 610 602 591 516 389 258 129 50 B short

627 615 612 601 519 408 268 149 50 A long

Number at risk

0 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96

Months from randomization

A long B short

Courtesy of PF Conte

(9)

LVEF change from baseline

50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64

Baseline 3 months 6 months 9 months 12 months 18 months

A long B short

LVEF% mean over time

p= 0.023

Courtesy of PF Conte

(10)

Conclusions

• At a median FUp of 5.2 years:

5y DFS Long Arm 87.5%, Short Arm 85.4%

HR= 1.15 (90% CI 0.91-1.46)

• Non inferiority cannot be claimed on the basis of the frequentist approach

• According to the pre-planned Bayesian analysis, probability that the short treatment is not inferior is 0.78

• Significant lower cardiac toxicity for the short treatment (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.21-0.50; p < 0.0001)

Presented by: PierFranco Conte

Courtesy of PF Conte

(11)

Anti HER2 Adjuvant Therapy Challenges with Evidence

 De-escalation of anti HER2 therapy

- non inferiority RCTs

 Combination and Sequence

- Trastuzumab + Lapatinib - Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab - Trastuzumab Neratinib

 Biosimilars

- Equivalence trials

(12)
(13)
(14)

Pertuzumab by Nodal Status

(15)

ExteNET: study design

(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)

Anti HER2 Adjuvant Therapy Challenges with Evidence

 De-escalation of anti HER2 therapy

- non inferiority RCTs

 Combination and Sequence

- Trastuzumab + Lapatinib - Trastuzumab + Pertuzumab - Trastuzumab Neratinib

 Biosimilars

- Equivalence trials

(25)
(26)
(27)

27

Biosimilar Innovator

Patient Population Sensitive and

homogeneous patient population

Any

Clinical Design Comparative vs innovator (equivalence studies)

Superiority vs standard of care

Study Endpoints Sensitive ORR, pCR

Efficacy data (OS, PFS)

Safety Similar safety profile to innovator

Acceptable risk/benefit profile vs standard of care Immunogenicity Similar immunogenicity

profile to innovator

Acceptable risk/benefit profile vs standard of care

Extrapolation Possible Not allowed

EMA Guideline: Requirements and Study Design for

Biosimilar and Innovator Clinical Trials

(28)

EMA GUIDELINE

Extrapolations of Indication

28

‘’Extrapolation of clinical efficacy and safety data to other indications of the reference mAb, not specifically studied during the clinical development of the biosimilar mAb, is possible based on the overall evidence of comparability provided from the comparability exercise and with adequate justification.’’

(29)
(30)
(31)

Jan Tannock, ESMO Madrid 2017

(32)

HER2+

EBC

Adjuvant

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus

trastuzumab/pertuzumab No pCR Neratinib x one year

HR-

HR+

Higher risk

Lower risk

Chemotherapy plus one year trastuzumab/pertuzumab

Chemotherapy plus one year trastuzumab

Risk based:

Neratinib x one year

Implications for the clinic

New treatment algorithm

(33)
(34)

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Le Sessioni hanno coperto l’intero spettro delle discipline aziendali e da essi saranno tratti alcuni paper per la predisposizione degli atti e altri per la pubblicazione nelle

When taking the ISGRI spectral response into account, the signal expected from most models is maximum over the 68−190 keV range, and the observations performed by IBIS /ISGRI during

Analizzando il livello di investimento delle aziende in iniziative di Applicazioni &amp; Device Mobili e la loro diffusione all’interno delle imprese, emerge che vi sono delle

A prescindere dal profilo della parziale sovrapposizione, in tale pronuncia, tra il tema della determinatezza della fattispecie sanzionatoria e quello della riserva di legge

The action research cycle reloaded is discussed, addressing in depth the activities to be performed at each stage as well as the role of the action research scholar: not just

The choice of this benchmark model is motivated by the key role it plays in the most recent and sophisticated dynamic spatial general equilibrium model, such as the

Regulation of vascular nitric oxide in vitro and in vivo; a new role for endogenous hydrogen

The precise physiological role of specific plant secondary metabolites has not been explored in details for most of them. One possible approach to elucidate