• Non ci sono risultati.

LetA be a 2 × 2 matrix with rational entries and both eigenvalues less than one in absolute value

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "LetA be a 2 × 2 matrix with rational entries and both eigenvalues less than one in absolute value"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Problem 11917

(American Mathematical Monthly, Vol.123, June-July 2016) Proposed by O. Furdui (Romania).

LetA be a 2 × 2 matrix with rational entries and both eigenvalues less than one in absolute value.

Prove that

log(I − A) := −

X

k=1

Ak k has rational entries if and only ifA2= 0.

Solution proposed by Roberto Tauraso, Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`a di Roma “Tor Vergata”, via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Roma, Italy.

Solution. Let L = log(I − A). If A2= 0 then L = −A and therefore L has rational entries.

Now we assume that L has rational entries. It is known (see K. S. Williams, The nth power of a 2 × 2 matrix, Math. Mag. 65(1992), 336) that for k ≥ 1,

Ak =





αk A − βI α − β



− βk A − αI α − β



, if α 6= β

αkI + kαk−1(A − αI), if α = β.

where α and β are the eigenvalues of the matrix A.

Hence, since |α| < 1 and |β| < 1, we have

L =









log(1 − α) A − βI α − β



− log(1 − β) A − αI α − β



, if α 6= β

log(1 − α)I − A − αI

1 − α , if α = β.

If α = β then,

l11= log(1 − α) −a11− α

1 − α ⇒ log(1 − α) = l11+a11− α 1 − α

Since l11, a11∈ Q and α is an algebraic number, it follows that 1 − α and l11+a1−α11−α are algebraic numbers. By Hermite-Lindemann theorem, the natural logarithm of a positive algebraic number different from 1 is transcendental, therefore 1 − α = 1, that is α = 0. Therefore tr(A) = 2α = 0, det(A) = α2= 0 which imply, by Cayley-Hamilton theorem, that A2= 0.

Now, it suffices to show that the condition α 6= β leads always to a contradiction. If a216= 0 then

(α − β)l21= log(1 − α)a21− log(1 − β)a21 ⇒ log 1 − α 1 − β



=(α − β)l21 a21 .

Hence, by using the same argument as above, we have that (1 − α)/(1 − β) = 1, that is α = β.

Contradiction.

So a21= 0 and, in a similar way, we get a12= 0. Thus, a11= α, a22= β and

(α − β)l11= log(1 − α)(a11− β) − log(1 − β)(a11− α) = log(1 − α)(α − β) ⇒ log(1 − α) = l11, (α − β)l22= log(1 − α)(a22− β) − log(1 − β)(a22− α) = − log(1 − β)(β − α) ⇒ log(1 − β) = l22. Therefore, again by using the same argument, we conclude that α = 0 and β = 0. Contradiction.  Remark. If A is a 2 × 2 matrix with integer entries and both eigenvalues less than one in absolute value then it follows immediately that tr(A) = det(A) = 0, and therefore A2= 0 by Cayley-Hamilton theorem.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Let s be the semiperimeter of the triangle and let A be

[r]

[r]

This is a contradiction because a positive integer is the sum of two squares if and only if all the prime factors congruent to 3 mod 4 have an even exponent in

Since algebraic and geometric multiplicities differ and hence there is no basis of R 4 consisting of eigenvectors of A, the matrix A cannot be

Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is not possible1. Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is

• The transformed matrices A, B and C maintain the same geometric and mathematical internal properties of matrices A, B and C of the given system: matrices A and A have the

 We conclude this section with the following result of the Perron-Frobenius theory, stated without proof (actually we shall give a proof of such result in the case A is