• Non ci sono risultati.

Analysis of statistics 2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Analysis of statistics 2013"

Copied!
60
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Analysis of statistics 2013

January 2014

(2)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 2/60

Table of contents

Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2013 ... 4

A.Number of new applications ... 4

B.Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications ... 4

C.Processing of applications ... 4

1. Pre-allocation ... 4

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions ... 4

3. Communicated applications ... 4

4. Judgments ... 4

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ... 5

D.Priority policy ... 5

General information ... 6

Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ... 7

Processing of applications ... 9

Country-specific information ... 14

Albania ... 14

Andorra ... 15

Armenia ... 16

Austria ... 17

Azerbaijan ... 18

Belgium ... 19

Bosnia and Herzegovina ... 20

Bulgaria ... 21

Croatia ... 22

Cyprus ... 23

Czech Republic ... 24

Denmark ... 25

Estonia ... 26

Finland ... 27

France ... 28

Georgia ... 29

Germany ... 30

Greece ... 31

Hungary ... 32

Iceland ... 33

Ireland ... 34

Italy ... 35

Latvia ... 36

Liechtenstein ... 37

(3)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 3/60

Lithuania ... 38

Luxembourg ... 39

Malta ... 40

Republic of Moldova ... 41

Monaco ... 42

Montenegro ... 43

Netherlands ... 44

Norway ... 45

Poland ... 46

Portugal ... 47

Romania ... 48

Russia ... 49

San Marino ... 50

Serbia ... 51

Slovakia ... 52

Slovenia ... 53

Spain ... 54

Sweden ... 55

Switzerland ... 56

“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” ... 57

Turkey ... 58

Ukraine ... 59

United Kingdom ... 60

(4)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 4/60

Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2013

A. Number of new applications

In 2013 65,900 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall increase of 2% compared with 2012 (64,900). 45,750 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases likely to be declared inadmissible (a decrease of 7% in relation to 2012). 20,150 were identified as probable Chamber or Committee1 cases (an increase of 27%).

B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications

93,396 applications were disposed of judicially, an increase of 6% in relation to 2012 (87,879). The number of cases disposed of therefore exceeded those allocated by approximately 27,500 (i.e. a monthly surplus of almost 2,300). As a result, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court decreased over the year, by 22% from 128,100 to 99,900.

C. Processing of applications

1. Pre-allocation

Before a case is allocated to a judicial formation applicants are required to complete the application form and submit the necessary supporting documents on pain of administrative disposal. As at 31 December 2013 the number of applications pending at this pre-judicial stage stood at 21,950, an increase of 8% in relation to the same date the previous year (20,300). The number of applications disposed of administratively in 2013 was 13,600, a decrease of 27%.

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions

In 2013 89,737 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Single Judge, a Committee or a Chamber, a 4% increase compared with 2012 (86,201). The Single-Judge formation decided 80,583 cases in 2013, a decrease of 1%

compared with 2012 (81,764). The number of applications struck out, in a decision or a judgment, following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration, decreased by 1% in 2013 (1,890 compared to 1,909 in 2012). Friendly settlements (1,481) increased by 14%

(1,303 in 2012), but there were 33% fewer unilateral declarations (409 compared to 606 in 2012).

3. Communicated applications

Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the respondent Government. In 2013 7,931 applications were communicated (an increase of 51% in relation to 2012 when 5,236 applications were communicated). This increase is due to the introduction of new working methods for well-established case-law cases in particular for Ukrainian or Serbian non-enforcement cases.

4. Judgments

Judgments were delivered in respect of 3,659 applications (compared with 1,678 in 2012 – an increase of 118%). A significant proportion of these applications were joined with the result that the number of judgments actually delivered was 916, a decrease of 16%.

219 judgments were adopted by a three-judge Committee formation under the procedure

1 Committee competence provided for in Article 28 § 1 b) of the Convention.

(5)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 5/60 introduced by Protocol 14. These judgments accounted for 75% of the applications. 81%

of those applications concerned the Ukrainian non-enforcement cases.

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)

The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,591) decreased by 20% compared with 2012 (1,979). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 108 cases (an increase of 5% compared with 103 in 2012) and dismissed them in 817 cases (32% less than the 1,203 in 2012). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules of Court.

D. Priority policy

2

In June 2009 the Court adopted a priority policy establishing seven different categories.

The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases, namely the cases falling within the top three categories (“priority applications”). At 31 December 2013 there were 7,368 applications in these categories.

The number of priority applications dealt with in 2013 decreased by 14% compared to 2012. 17% less priority applications were communicated to the respondent Governments in comparison with 2012. The number of priority applications declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee decreased by 31%. A number of priority cases are awaiting leading decisions or judgments (in particular for expulsion cases) or the outcome of a pilot judgment (for example in conditions of detention cases).

Another factor explaining the decrease compared to 2012 is that in that year a large number of cases concerning expulsion to Somalia were struck out. The number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a unilateral declaration rose from 158 in 2012 to 247 in 2013. The number of priority applications giving rise to a judgment decreased by 5% in 2013.

2 An explanation of the Court’s priority policy can be found on the Court’s internet site http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Priority_policy_ENG.pdf

(6)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 6/60

General information

Table 1 General statistical information

65900 64900 2%

2013 2012 +/-

7931 5236 51%

2013 2012 +/-

93396 87879 6%

3659 1678 118%

89737 86201 4%

31/12/2013 1/1/2013 +/- 99900 128100 -22%

39000 43050 -9%

34400 25200 37%

26500 59850 -56%

31/12/2013 1/1/2013 +/-

21950 20300 8%

2013 2012 +/-

13600 18700 -27%

1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation

2013 2012 +/-

[round figures (50)]

Applications allocated

2. Interim procedural events

Applications communicated to respondent Government

3. Applications decided

By decision or judgment

- by judgment delivered

5. Pre-judicial applications[round figures (50)]

Applications at a pre-judicial stage

Applications disposed of administratively (applications not pursued)

- by decision (inadmissible or struck out)

4. Pending applications[round figures (50)]

Applications pending before a judicial formation

- Chamber (7 judges) - Committee (3 judges) - Single-Judge formation

(7)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 7/60

Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation

3

Chart 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year

Chart 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation

3 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 2002 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage.

0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 1050013800

28200 27200 32500

35400 39200

41600 49700

57000 61100

64300 64900 65900

15900 19800 29400

38500 50000

56800 66500

79400 97300

119300 139650

151600

128100

99900

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

(8)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 8/60 Chart 3 High case-count States (more than 1,800 applications pending before a

judicial formation)

Chart 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation4

4 The “Pending Government action” category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying the pilot procedure.

Russia 16800 16,8%

Italy 14400 14,4%

Ukraine 13300 13,3%

Serbia 11250 11,3%

Turkey 10950 11,0%

Romania 6150 6,2%

United Kingdom 2500

2,5%

Georgia 2450 2,5%

Bulgaria 2450 2,5%

Slovenia 1800 1,8%

remaining 37 States 17850 17,9%

Total number of pending applications: 99,900

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

26712 26,7%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 55624 55,7%

Communicated 12585 12,6%

Pending Government action

4136 4,1%

Admissible 834 0,8%

Total applications 99,900

(9)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 9/60 Chart 5 The Court’s total caseload by category

Processing of applications

Chart 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications

Cat. I 871 Cat. II 0,9%

334 0,3%

Cat. III 6320 6,3%

Cat. IV 17689 17,7%

Cat. V 47965 48,0%

Cat. VI-VII 26712 26,7%

Total applications 99,900

0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Applications

judgment delivered 757 934 889 736 816 1208 1719 1734 1880 2393 2607 1511 1678 3659 Applications

communicated 1463 1573 1686 1717 2447 2956 3232 3456 4416 6203 6674 5360 5236 7931 Applications

inadmissible or struck out

6779 8992 17865 17272 20350 27612 28160 27059 30163 33067 38575 50677 86201 89737

(10)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 10/60 Chart 7 Number of judgments since 2000

Chart 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed from 2011 to 2013

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 695

888 844

703 718

1105 1560

1503 1543 1625

1499

1157 1093

916

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600

2011 2012 2013

1342

1563

1303

573

921

771

412

546 517

communicated

decision

judgment

(11)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 11/60 Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population

The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 822 million inhabitants on 1 January 2013. The average number of applications allocated per 10,000 inhabitants was 0.80 in 2013.

State

2010 2011 2012 2013 1.1.2010 1.1.2011 1.1.2012 1.1.2013 2010 2011 2012 2013

Albania 94 84 111 106 3185 2832 3195 3195 0,30 0,30 0,35 0,33

Andorra 8 8 6 2 85 85 85 76 0,94 0,94 0,71 0,26

Armenia 197 173 238 196 3249 3263 3274 3274 0,61 0,53 0,73 0,60

Austria 438 387 377 437 8375 8404 8443 8452 0,52 0,46 0,45 0,52

Azerbaijan 335 501 342 325 8998 9111 9235 9356 0,37 0,55 0,37 0,35

Belgium 302 251 268 270 10840 11001 11041 11162 0,28 0,23 0,24 0,24 Bosnia and

Herzegovina 661 508 430 871 3844 3843 3829 3829 1,72 1,32 1,12 2,27

Bulgaria 1350 1200 1274 1209 7564 7369 7327 7285 1,78 1,63 1,74 1,66

Croatia 992 1186 1905 1842 4426 4412 4398 4262 2,24 2,69 4,33 4,32

Cyprus 118 69 78 144 819 840 862 866 1,44 0,82 0,90 1,66

Czech Republic 604 522 547 481 10507 10487 10505 10516 0,57 0,50 0,52 0,46

Denmark 96 111 103 85 5535 5561 5581 5603 0,17 0,20 0,18 0,15

Estonia 266 346 301 237 1340 1340 1340 1325 1,99 2,58 2,25 1,79

Finland 379 431 314 315 5351 5375 5401 5427 0,71 0,80 0,58 0,58

France 1614 1594 1344 1538 64694 65048 65398 65633 0,25 0,25 0,21 0,23

Georgia 375 395 367 157 4436 4469 4498 4498 0,85 0,88 0,82 0,35

Germany 1681 1757 1492 1528 81802 81752 81844 82021 0,21 0,21 0,18 0,19

Greece 626 668 722 726 11305 11310 11291 11063 0,55 0,59 0,64 0,66

Hungary 437 654 735 990 10014 9986 9958 9909 0,44 0,65 0,74 1,00

Iceland 15 10 10 9 318 318 320 322 0,47 0,31 0,31 0,28

Ireland 62 54 55 61 4468 4570 4583 4591 0,14 0,12 0,12 0,13

Italy 3850 4708 3246 3184 60340 60626 60821 59685 0,64 0,78 0,53 0,53

Latvia 270 291 286 322 2248 2075 2042 2024 1,20 1,40 1,40 1,59

Liechtenstein 15 9 16 7 36 36 36 37 4,17 2,50 4,44 1,89

Lithuania 242 305 373 428 3329 3053 3008 2972 0,73 1,00 1,24 1,44

Luxemburg 45 24 31 38 502 512 525 537 0,90 0,47 0,59 0,71

Malta 23 22 26 50 414 415 416 421 0,56 0,53 0,63 1,19

Republic of Moldova 938 1017 934 1356 3564 3560 3560 3559 2,63 2,86 2,62 3,81

Monaco 14 8 5 10 33 33 36 36 4,24 2,42 1,39 2,78

Montenegro 306 314 180 293 616 618 618 623 4,97 5,08 2,91 4,70

Netherlands 687 800 675 778 16575 16656 16730 16780 0,41 0,48 0,40 0,46

Norway 87 155 101 148 4858 4920 4986 5051 0,18 0,32 0,20 0,29

Poland 5768 5022 4071 3990 38167 38530 38538 38533 1,51 1,30 1,06 1,04 Portugal 182 165 217 267 10638 10572 10542 10487 0,17 0,16 0,21 0,25 Romania 5818 5124 6768 5422 21462 21414 21356 20057 2,71 2,39 3,17 2,70 Russia 14293 12454 10746 12330 141915 142857 143056 143056 1,01 0,87 0,75 0,86

San Marino 4 0 1 4 31 32 32 34 1,29 0,00 0,31 1,18

Serbia 1567 3726 4894 5061 7307 7276 7241 7182 2,14 5,12 6,76 7,05

Slovak Republic 566 553 531 464 5425 5392 5404 5411 1,04 1,03 0,98 0,86

Slovenia 837 424 422 495 2047 2050 2055 2059 4,09 2,07 2,05 2,40

Spain 670 802 694 784 45989 46153 46196 46704 0,15 0,17 0,15 0,17

Sweden 1080 1942 546 362 9341 9416 9483 9556 1,16 2,06 0,58 0,38

Switzerland 368 358 326 445 7786 7870 7955 8039 0,47 0,45 0,41 0,55

"The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia" 399 352 350 539 2053 2057 2060 2062 1,94 1,71 1,70 2,61

Turkey 5724 8651 8986 3521 72561 73723 74724 75627 0,79 1,17 1,20 0,47 Ukraine 3953 4614 7791 13152 45783 45598 45453 45373 0,86 1,01 1,71 2,90 United Kingdom 2745 1542 1702 912 62027 62499 62990 63888 0,44 0,25 0,27 0,14 Total 61101 64291 64937 65891 816202 819319 822271 822458 0,75 0,78 0,79 0,80 SOURCES 2012 et 2013: Internet sites of the Eurostat service (“Population and social conditions” ) or from the United Nations Statistics Division.

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Population (1000)

Allocated/population (10000)

(12)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 12/60 Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation

State

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

Communicated

Pending Government

action

Admissible TOTAL

Albania 94 170 159 4 427

Andorra 0 0 1 0 1

Armenia 116 758 68 1 943

Austria 89 72 43 9 213

Azerbaijan 84 1041 165 3 1293

Belgium 17 280 55 12 364

Bosnia and Herzegovina 813 385 69 5 1272

Bulgaria 1715 618 103 7 2443

Croatia 203 625 146 15 989

Cyprus 83 38 47 1 169

Czech Republic 472 81 33 5 591

Denmark 8 7 8 0 23

Estonia 288 35 14 3 340

Finland 127 31 34 5 197

France 244 255 131 15 645

Georgia 65 2223 163 2 2453

Germany 320 141 36 5 502

Greece 56 948 272 21 1297

Hungary 943 692 101 3 1739

Iceland 5 2 4 0 11

Ireland 11 4 5 2 22

Italy 650 12101 804 793 31 14379

Latvia 321 125 80 4 530

Liechtenstein 0 3 3 0 6

Lithuania 83 98 61 8 250

Luxembourg 6 4 2 1 13

Malta 13 35 16 0 64

Republic of Moldova 366 767 248 20 13 1414

Monaco 0 3 0 3 6

Montenegro 629 139 23 1 792

Netherlands 152 225 74 2 453

Norway 67 2 19 3 91

Poland 363 1015 258 12 1648

Portugal 25 149 56 2 232

Romania 564 1428 923 3197 61 6173

Russia 9499 4835 2251 126 102 16813

San Marino 1 3 1 0 5

Serbia 2667 7081 1435 47 11230

Slovakia 65 104 55 16 240

Slovenia 1519 173 84 6 1782

Spain 249 47 93 4 393

Sweden 26 27 33 7 93

Switzerland 76 121 64 10 271

"The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia" 42 169 129 5 345

Turkey 398 8453 1997 83 10931

Ukraine 2866 7992 2136 290 13284

United Kingdom 312 2119 83 5 2519

ALL STATES 26712 55624 12585 4136 834 99891

(13)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 13/60

Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements in the past three years

State

2011 2012 2013 2011 2012 2013

Albania 1 2 0 1 1

Andorra 0 0 0 0

Armenia 6 2 0 0

Austria 0 0 8 1 1

Azerbaijan 1 0 3 2 1 11

Belgium 1 0 0 0 3

Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 3 78 43 176

Bulgaria 5 28 4 9 85 19

Croatia 0 6 3 11 18 31

Cyprus 0 0 0 0

Czech Republic 0 7 20 10 4 12

Denmark 0 0 0 6 1

Estonia 0 0 2 0 1

Finland 1 4 1 2 8 3

France 1 4 2 7 2 2

Georgia 0 1 3 2 4 11

Germany 0 1 2 1 2 3

Greece 0 0 14 3 55

Hungary 0 2 3 45 53 73

Iceland 0 0 0 0

Ireland 0 0 2 1 3

Italy 0 0 44 7 117 4

Latvia 1 1 3 1

Liechtenstein 1 0 0 0

Lithuania 1 0 1 0 0

Luxembourg 0 0 0 0

Malta 0 2 0 0

Republic of Moldova 62 5 21 15 13 8

Monaco 0 0 0 1

Montenegro 0 0 0 1 19

Netherlands 0 0 1 0 1 2

Norway 0 0 0 0

Poland 44 40 41 154 111 93

Portugal 5 1 5 12 10 4

Romania 30 61 38 21 35 29

Russia 205 100 102 12 3 39

San Marino 1 1 1

Serbia 10 3 9 69 415 679

Slovakia 2 3 4 29 9 23

Slovenia 2 0 0 1

Spain 0 0 0 0 1

Sweden 0 0 0 1

Switzerland 0 0 0 0

The form er Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia' 12 1 48 28 67 55

Turkey 39 14 27 115 99 86

Ukraine 262 313 23 161 178 28

United Kingdom 10 2 4 9 7 5

Grand Total 703 606 409 829 1303 1481

Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement

(14)

14

Country-specific information

Albania

Chart 9 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 10 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

94 22%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 170 40%

Communicated 159 37%

Admissible 4 1%

Total applications 427

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

2011 2012 2013

84

111

106

46

58

48

17

39

70

5

10 9

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(15)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 15/60

Andorra

Chart 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications Communicated

1 100%

Total applications 1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

2011 2012 2013

8

6

2 4

15

6

2

0 0

0

2

0 Applications allocated to a judicial

formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(16)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 16/60

Armenia

Chart 13 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 14 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

116 12%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 758 81%

Communicated 68 7%

Admissible 1 0,1%

Total applications 943

0 50 100 150 200 250

2011 2012 2013

173

238

196

144

229

195

16 11 19

5

16

2 Applications allocated to a judicial

formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(17)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 17/60

Austria

Chart 15 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 16 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

89 42%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 72 34%

Communicated 43 20%

Admissible 9 4%

Total applications 213

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2011 2012 2013

387 377

437

334

549

611

21 18 14 23 27 22

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(18)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 18/60

Azerbaijan

Chart 17 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 18 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

84 6,5%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 1041 80,5%

Communicated 165 12,8%

Admissible 3 0,2%

Total applications 1 293

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2011 2012 2013

501

342 325

62

694

284

45 34

115

25 37

13 Applications allocated to a judicial

formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(19)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 19/60

Belgium

Chart 19 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 20 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

17 5%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 280 77%

Communicated 55 15%

Admissible 12 3%

Total applications 364

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

2011 2012 2013

251 265 268 270

468

253

18 27

37

9 6 9

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(20)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 20/60

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Chart 21 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 22 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

813 64%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 385 30%

Communicated 69 6%

Admissible 5 0%

Total applications 1 272

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

2011 2012 2013

508

430

871

410 361

1019

79

29

213

33 12 26

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(21)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 21/60

Bulgaria

Chart 23 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 24 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

1715 70%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 618 26%

Communicated 103

4%

Admissible 7 0%

Total applications 2 443

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

2011 2012 2013

1200 1274 1209

543

1425

2552

141 73 85 72 44 26

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(22)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 22/60

Croatia

Chart 25 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 26 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

203 21%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 625 63%

Communicated 146 15%

Admissible 15 1%

Total applications 989

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

2011 2012 2013

1186

1905

1842

1014

2392

2047

65 59 142

49 22 24

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(23)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 23/60

Cyprus

Chart 27 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 28 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

83 49%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 38 22%

Communicated 47 28%

Admissible 1 1%

Total applications 169

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

2011 2012 2013

69

78

144

43

55

163

39

2 3

3 0 1

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(24)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 24/60

Czech Republic

Chart 29 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 30 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

472 80%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 81 14%

Communicated 33 5%

Admissible 5 1%

Total applications 591

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

2011 2012 2013

522 547

481 588

773 827

46 29 43 30 36 11

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(25)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 25/60

Denmark

Chart 31 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 32 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

8 35%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 7 30%

Communicated 8 35%

Total applications 23

0 50 100 150 200 250

2011 2012 2013

111

103

85 99

201

88

16 6 8 6

1 0

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(26)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 26/60

Estonia

Chart 33 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 34 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

288 84,7%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 35 10,3%

Communicated 14

4,1% Admissible

3 0,9%

Total applications 340

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

2011 2012 2013

346

301

229 237

269

533

12 3 8 8 9 6

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(27)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 27/60

Finland

Chart 35 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 36 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

127 64,5%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 31 15,7%

Communicated 34 17,3%

Admissible 5 2,5%

Total applications 197

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700

2011 2012 2013

431

314 315

485

615

300

24 24 21

7 5 3

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(28)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 28/60

France

Chart 37 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 38 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

244 38%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 255 40%

Communicated 131 20%

Admissible 15 2%

Total applications 645

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

2011 2012 2013

1594

1344 1485 1538

2518

2391

105 45 74

32 32 36

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

(29)

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2013 29/60

Georgia

Chart 39 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Graph 40 Major procedural steps in processing applications

Single Judge or Committee (cat. VI - VII)

65 3%

Chamber or Committee - awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V) 2223

90%

Communicated 163 7%

Admissible 2 0,1%

Total applications 2 453

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

2011 2012 2013

395

367

160 157

521

577

51 30 38

4 12 2

Applications allocated to a judicial formation

Applications declared inadmissible or struck out

Applications communicated to the Government

Applications in which judgments delivered

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

However, Apart from Islamist culture, the Oman‟s demographic history during the second half of the twentieth century displays following features: (I) a major visible

In this paper we have shown that our forward analysis using the values of C p ( m ) , and their summary in the generalized candlestick plot, provide a powerful method of

In this paper we combine different lines of research in the context of term structure of default intensity and, for the first time in the literature, we extend the forward search

The algorithms that we use are the Forward Search Regression routine (FSR), the LMS and LTS routines and their reweighted versions contained in the MATLAB toolbox called FSDA

We performed an extreme value analysis of the RR intervals times series extracted from 24-h Holter ECG signals of 90 healthy people (nsr_gda and nsr2db groups [9]) and 90

sufficiently small for the whole of it to be visible at once ; if the figure is complicated, relating to a long series of years and vary- ing numbers, minute accuracy must

This study shows that 6MWT, a test commonly used to measure exercise capacity and motor fitness, predicts the risk for mortality, cardiovascular events and hospitalizations in

Se la conclusione di Albertano rispetta gli intenti morali del trattato – che educa il cittadino alla gestione ‘consiliare’ del conflitto, alla valutazione realistica delle forze