• Non ci sono risultati.

WRF and WRF-Hydro fully coupled experiment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "WRF and WRF-Hydro fully coupled experiment"

Copied!
9
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

at Foligno station site.

Figure C.18: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2012 at Ficulle station site.

(2)

at Cerbara station site.

Figure C.20: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2012 at PgIng1 station site.

(3)

at PgIng2 station site.

C.4 Evaluation over 2013

Figure C.22: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2013

(4)

at San Benedetto station site.

Figure C.24: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2013 at Pieve Santo Stefano station site.

(5)

at Petrelle station site.

Figure C.26: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2013 at Monterchi station site.

(6)

at Ficulle station site.

Figure C.28: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2013 at Cerbara station site.

(7)

at PgIng1 station site.

Figure C.30: Soil moisture dynamic for level SM1=0.1 m (panel (a)) and SM2=0.3 m (panel (b)) soil depths and rain and temperature variations (panel (c)) for the year 2013 at PgIng2 station site.

(8)

WRF and WRF-Hydro fully coupled experiment

D.1 Days with maximum rainfall differences

Figure D.1: Daily rainfall map comparison for the 24 July 2012 among WRF/WRF- Hydro (panel (a)), WRF (panel (b) and the gauge observations (panel (c)).

Figure D.2: Daily rainfall map comparison for the 3 September 2012 among WRF/WRF- Hydro (panel (a)), WRF (panel (b) and the gauge observations (panel (c)).

(9)

Figure D.4: Daily rainfall map comparison for the 13 October 2012 among WRF/WRF- Hydro (panel (a)), WRF (panel (b) and the gauge observations (panel (c)).

Figure D.5: Daily rainfall map comparison for the 18 November 2012 among WRF/WRF- Hydro (panel (a)), WRF (panel (b) and the gauge observations (panel (c)).

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

[r]

Quali sono gli interventi (non medico-chirurgici) per la presa in carico dei bisogni psico-socio-assistenziali- esistenziali e di engagement durante l’età evolutiva nelle

Raffaella Tancredi Angelo Massagli Giovanni

We commence our discussion by describing the models that we will use during the analysis: the first being the multilevel model, that takes into account the hierarchical structure of

[r]

Panel Evidence Table 6 reports our panel estimates of the effects of volatility, natural resource dependence, financial development and openness as well as investment rates,

D.10 Soil moisture comparison at the Petrelle station site for the different sim- ulations for the SM1 and SM2 soil layers: WRF-Hydro calibration run (blue), WRF/WRF-Hydro (yellow),

Monte Carlo simulations show that the proposed approach has three advantages: (i) it avoids the problem of instrument proliferation by adding a single moment condition to