• Non ci sono risultati.

La metodologia della ricerca clinica: aspetti salienti per l’oncologo

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "La metodologia della ricerca clinica: aspetti salienti per l’oncologo"

Copied!
20
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

La metodologia della ricerca clinica: aspetti salienti per l’oncologo

Valter Torri

Lab. Metodologia della Ricerca Clinica

Dipartimento di Oncologia

IRCCS Istituto ‘Mario Negri’ - Milano

(2)

Controllo di confondimento e bias

Confondimento Randomizzazione

(3)

Qualità dell’evidenza

(4)

Disegno

Dimensione dello studio Random error

Arruolamento Selection bias

Conduzione Performance bias

Attrition bias

Valutazione degli endpoint Detection bias

Analisi statistica Selection bias

(5)

Evoluzione degli metodologia

Anni ’90: simple large

Anni 2000 : personalized medicine

(6)

Evoluzione degli metodologia

Anni ’90: simple large

Effetti moderati Pochi endpoints Issues: Power Disegni fattoriali I.P.D. Meta-analysis

BM prognostici (tranne ER/PGR)

Anni 2000 : personalized medicine

(7)

Evoluzione degli metodologia

Anni ’90: simple large

Effetti moderati Pochi endpoints Issues: Power Disegni fattoriali I.P.D. Meta-analysis

BM prognostici (tranne ER/PGR)

Anni 2000 : personalized medicine

Effetti attesi importanti Endpoint ‘surrogati’

Enrichment → Cross-over Disegni adattivi

Umbrella trials Real life evidence

Biomarker predittivi / biopsia liquida

(8)

I pazienti

pop. target

restrizioni

Paclitaxel–Carboplatin Alone or with Bevacizumab for Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

A.Sandler, M.D., et al. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2542-50

(9)

Scelta del braccio di controllo

Pubblicati 2009-2011

Pubblicati 2011-2012

Accrual

2010-2011

(10)

Scelta degli endpoints: ALK inh.

(11)

Scelta degli endpoints: PD-1 inh.

(12)

YES NO NO

Correlation with late benefit

Typical survival curves observed in clinical trials

(13)

Limitaton: reliability of interim analysis

(14)

Analisi di sottogruppi

(15)

Molteplicità di endpoint

Lux-lung 7: Study Design

Park K, et al. Lancet Oncol 2016

Treatment beyond progression allowed if deemed beneficial by investigator

RECIST assessment performed at Weeks 4, 8 and every 8 weeks thereafter until Week 64, and every 12 weeks thereafter

Afatinib 40 mg once daily

Gefitinib 250 mg once daily

Primary endpoints:

• PFS (independent)

• TTF

• OS

Secondary endpoints:

• ORR

• Time to response

• Duration of response

• Duration of disease control

• Tumor shrinkage

• HRQoL

• Safety

*Central or local test

Dose modification to 50, 30, 20 mg permitted in line with prescribing information

1:1

• Stage IIIB/IV

adenocarcinoma of the lung

• EGFR mutation (Del19 and/or

L858R) in the tumor tissue*

• No prior treatment for advanced/

metastatic disease

• ECOG PS 0/1

Stratified by

• Mutation type (Del19/L858R)

• Brain metastases (present/absent)

(16)

Molteplicità di endpoint

• Afatinib significantly improved PFS of patients with EGFRm+ NSCLC relative to gefitinib. Results are consistent across subgroups

• Afatinib treatment was associated with a significant improvement in response rate and TTF

• The improvement in efficacy was observed in both Del19 and L858R populations

• OS data immature (current HR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.66–1.15)

• AEs in both groups were consistent with previous experience, and were

manageable leading to equally low rates of treatment discontinuation

• LUX-Lung 7 confirms the benefit of irreversible ErbB blockade with afatinib over reversible EGFR inhibition with gefitinib in treatment of EGFRm+ NSCLC

Lux-lung 7: Park K, et al. Lancet Oncol 2016

(17)

Co-primary & multiple endpoints

Willi Maurer & Frank Bretz (2013) Multiple Testing in Group Sequential

Trials Using Graphical Approaches, Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research, 5:4, 311-320

(18)

Selection &

Evaluation bias

• Analisi ITT vs PP

• IRB vs Local

(19)

Global Appraisal

• Validity

• Precision of results

• Risk/Benefit profile

▫ D absolute vs relative

▫ NNT/NNH

(20)

Conclusioni

• Studi moderni in genere di buona qualità formale

▫ Randomizzazione

▫ Mascheramento

▫ ITT

• Attenzione ad altri aspetti sostanziali

▫ Scelta braccio controllo

▫ Scelta endpoint

▫ Scelta misure riassuntive

▫ Maturità dei dati

▫ Valutazione di contesto

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati