• Non ci sono risultati.

Low-Speed Sensorless Control for Wind Turbine System MOHAMMED TAOUSSI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Low-Speed Sensorless Control for Wind Turbine System MOHAMMED TAOUSSI"

Copied!
13
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Low-Speed Sensorless Control for Wind Turbine System

MOHAMMED TAOUSSI

(1)

, MOHAMMED KARIM

(1)

, BADRE BOSSOUFI

(2),

DALILA HAMMOUMI

(1),

CHAKIB EL BAKKALI

(1),

AZIZ DEROUICH

(3),

NAJIB EL OUANJLI

(3)

(1)

Laboratory of Systems Integration and Advanced Technologies (LISTA), Faculty of Sciences Dhar El Mahraz, University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah Fez - MAROCCO

m.taoussi0@gmail.com

(2)

Laboratory of Electrical Engineering and Maintenance (LGEM) ESTO School of Technology, University Mohammed I Oujda - M AROCCO

(3)

Laboratory Production Engineering, Energy and Sustainable Development (PE2D), College of Technology, University Sidi Mohammed Ben Abdellah Fez - M AROCCO

Abstract: - In the propose of the work, we concerns the elaboration an efficient and robust control of active and reactive power by the use the PI regulators control (FOC) a power converters directly connected to the stator and the rotor of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator (DFIG) system incorporated in a wind turbine to improve the performance of a speed wind turbine. In the aim to assess the performance and dynamics of the wind system, for the different test speeds of the wind, we are interested in the modeling, development and control of the wind system. Initially, a control strategy of the MPPT-DFIG is presented. Therefore, the aim is the study and implementation of the new control technique for wind systems. This control technique is based on the orientation control of the flow rotor to DFIG. Finally, the control simulation results are simulated on the environment Matlab / Simulink. A very detailed analysis of simulation results of wind conversion chain system is performed with the objective to evaluate and optimize the performance of the proposed system.

Key-Words: - Wind Turbine; DFIG-Generator; modeling; Rotor Control; vector control; MPPT Control;

Orientation of the flow rotorique; Matlab / Simulink.

1 Introduction

The electricity has become more and more essential for humanity. Indeed, access to electricity, is the guarantee of best living conditions (hygiene, health, education). So it is at the heart about the future of our society. It is as much by a factor of construction and wealth creation. On the one hand, demographic evolution of the world implies a sustainable increase in energy needs. Moreover, energy consumption, still on the increase, is reduce fossil energy reserves (coal, oil, gas) and away from the use of polluting fossil energy (carbon dioxide emissions), many countries have looked to renewable energy. There are many renewable energy resources: hydropower, wind power, solar thermal and photovoltaic, the energy produced by the waves and marine currents, geothermal and biomass [1]. These energy resources are virtually inexhaustible and clean. The wind power is among the renewable energies, the one that knows the fastest growing in the world. It is almost universally recognized as the most promising source of energy to produce clean electricity in the short and medium term. And it contributes to environmental preservation.

Currently, Sustainable development and renewable energy today arouse the interest of

several research teams. Thus, the development and the multiplication of wind turbines have led the researchers to improve the efficiency of electromechanical conversion and quality of the energy supplied. It is in this context that we present a study on the use of a doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) in a wind system, because of the many advantages over other types of electric machines, since its construction is simple, its low cost, its security interest of operation, its robustness and especially its simple and economical maintenance. Through evolution and development of new technology recent power electronics and informatics, the problems inherent in the controls and operation of the various applications of the speed variables DFIG are resolved and simplified.

In this context, for appropriate operation of the variable speed DFIG, one must insert a power converter PWM and control by vector control orientation of the flow rotor, whose objective is to regulate the electrical power extract it from the machine to its reference value, we apply this control to successfully DFIG, which gave a good powerful tool for its control. The performance of this control will be conducted by simulation results with interpretations. Figure 1 presents a general structure

(2)

of the electrical control of the wind energy system, which is studied in this work, constituted the wind turbine with three swivel blade length R, the DFIG generator and the speed multiplier:

Figure 1. Overall architecture of the control system of the wind.

2 Modeling of Wind Power System

2.1 Modeling of the Turbine

The modeling of the wind turbine is characterized by the curves of the power coefficient, which corresponds to the relation between the mechanical power extract from the wind and the incident power. The expression for the power extracted available on the rotor of the turbine, is expressed by [2]:

 

 

=

=

.

3

2 . 1

) , ( . v S P

C P

P

Incident

p Incident Extraited

ρ

β λ

(1) With:

S: The surface swept by the blades of the turbine (m2).

ρ: The density of air (ρ =1.225kg/m3).

V : Wind speed (m/s).

) , ( λ β

Cp : Power coefficient.

Hence the power coefficient,Cp(λ,β), to a limit known as Betz limit. This limit is the maximum extractable power for a given wind speed

593 . 0 ) ,

max

( λ β ≈

C

p [15]. For the DFIG, the

power coefficient is possible to model with a single equation that depends on the speed ratio ë and the orientation angle â of the blades as follows [2]:

λ β

β

λ 1 . . .

. . ) ,

( 6

1

4 3 2 1

5 c

e c A c

c c

CpcA+

 

 − −

= (2)

With:



=

+

= +



=

=

=

=

=

=

v R et A

c c c c c c

t. 1

035 . 0 . 08 . 0

1 1

0085 . 0 21 5

4 . 0 116

5872 . 0

3

6 5 4 3 2 1

λ

β β

λ (3)

From equation (2), it displays the power coefficient curves as a function of λfor differentβ values [23]:

Figure 2. Curves of the Cp power coefficient as a function of λ and β.

From Figure 2, we obtain a maximum power coefficientCmaxp (λ,β)=0.4798, for a speed ratio

0

12 =

= β

λ and , by setting λopt and β

respectively to their optimal values; the wind system will provide optimal electrical power. The power and mechanical torque of the turbine is noted [8]:

t p

t mec mec

p mec

v C

P S C

v C

S P

=

=

=

. 1 ).

, ( . 2 . 1

).

, ( . 2 . 1

3 3

β λ ρ

β λ

ρ (4)

With:

t : The turbine rotation speed.

Cmec : Torque on the slow axis (turbine side).

According to equations (1), (2), (3) and (4), we model the turbine as follows:

Figure 3. Modeling of the wind turbine.

2.2 Multiplier modeling

The multiplier is the connection between the wind turbine and DFIG. It is adapted the speed of the turbine to that of the generator as well mechanical torque on the shaft of the generator by the following equations [3]:

Shaft Grid

(L)

C

Rectifier Inverter

AC

DC

= AC

DC

=

Laws of the Control

Rotor

Stator DFIG

Multiplier Turbine

0 5 10 15 20 25

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

X: 12 Y: 0.4798

Speed Ratio (λ)

Coefficient of power (Cp) β=0

β=5 β=10 β=15 β=20 β=25 Cpmax=0.4798

λopt=12

u(1)^3 wind_speed^3 lambda beta

cp

cp(lambda,beta) Vent

[P_mec]

[C_mec]

(Ro*S)/2 R

[Omega]

[Beta]

[Omega]

(3)

g aer

t g

G C C

G 1 1

= Ω

=

Ω (5)

With:

g

: generator speed (speed shaft in rad/s).

G: multiplication ratio.

t

: blade rotation speed (output shaft in rad/s).

C

g

: mechanical torque on the axis of the generator (Nm).

C

aer

: mechanical turbine torque (N · m).

The next block diagram represents the modeling of the multiplier for wind:

Figure 4. Modeling of wind multiplier.

2.3 Shaft Modeling

The fundamental equation of the dynamics that characterize the mechanical behavior of the turbine and generator from the total mechanical torque (Cmec) applied to the rotor is given by the following formula:

méc vis

vis em ar méc

méc méc

f C

C C C C

dt C J d

=

= Ω =

.

(6)

With:

méc : Mechanical speed the DFIG.

Car : Aerodynamic torque on the fast axis of the turbine.

Cem : Electromagnetic torque.

f : friction coefficient.

In operation the electromagnetic torque generator Cmec has a negative sign. The next block diagram represents the modeling of the shaft for wind [10]:

Figure 5. Modeling of the turbine shaft.

3 Extraction of Maximum Power by the Method MPPT

The MPPT (Maximum Power Point Tracking) is a principle for tracking the maximum power point of an electric generator for a variant source. The MPPT has been created to have the best possible connection between the source and the nonlinear grid to extract the maximum power.

In order to capture the maximum power of the incident wind, must permanently adjust the rotation speed of the turbine to the wind. The wind speed is difficult to measure, we assume that the wind speed is constant over the study period, the rotation speed of the turbine is assumed to be constant with respect to the high inertia of the latter. If we neglect the friction coefficient of the mechanical shaft, we can write the following equation [4]:

Cg= Cem (7)

With, Cg is the torque exerted on the shaft after the multiplier.

Then, the reference of the electromagnetic torque of the turbine is obtained from the following equation:







= Ω

= Ω

=

opt t

p t aer

aer ref

em

V R

V C

C

G C C

λ

ρ .

. . .

2

1 3

max _

(8)

Hence the electromagnetic torque reference is:

2 2 3 max

_

. . .

. . 2

1 Ω

=

ρ π

λ

opt p ref

em

C

C G (9)

The following block diagram shows the extraction modeling of the maximum power from the equation (9):

Figure 6. Maximum power extraction model by startigé MPPT.

On the basis of the previous equations and models, the global schema we can give to all the dynamic model of the wind turbine (Fig 7):

[Omega_t]

[C_g]

1/G [Omega_g] 1/G

[C_aer]

1 J.s+f

[Omega_g]

[C_g]

[C_em]

u(1)^3

[C_em]

R/Lamdba_opt (Ro*S*Cp_max)/2

1/G

1/G [Omega_g]

[Omega_g]

(4)

Figure 7. Synoptic diagram of global model the wind turbine with maximum power extratction.

4 Modeling of the DFIG

For a better representation of the behavior of a doubly fed induction generator, it is necessary to use a specific model and simple. The two-phase models (d, q) given by the Park transformation is used [9].

4.1 Electrical Equations of DFIG

The equations of the stator voltages Vs (d, q) and the rotor Vr (d, q), the dynamic model are expressed by DFIG [5]:









+ +

=

− +

=

+ +

=

− +

=

rd r rq rq

r rq

rq r rd rd

r rd

sd s sq sq

s sq

sq s sd sd

s sd

dt I d

R V

dt I d

R V

dt I d

R V

dt I d

R V

ϕ ϕ ω

ϕ ϕ ω

ϕ ϕ ω

ϕ ϕ ω

. .

. .

. .

. .

(10)









=

=

=

=

sq s r

sr rq

r rq

sd s r

sr rd

r rd

sq r s

sr sq

s sq

sd r sr sd

s sd

L L M I L

L L M I L

L L M I L

L M I L

σ ϕ σ ϕ

σ ϕ σ ϕ

σ ϕ σ ϕ

σ ϕ σ ϕ

. . . .

. 1

. . . .

. 1

. . . .

. 1

. . . .

1

(11)

4.2 Magnetic Equations

The following magnetic equations are taken from electrical equations (11):





+

=

+

=

+

=

+

=

sq sr rq

r rq

sd sr rd

r rd

rq sr sq

s sq

rd sr sd

s sd

I M I L

I M I L

I M I L

I M I L

. .

. .

. .

. .

ϕ ϕ ϕ ϕ

(12)

4.3 Mechanical Equations

The electromagnetic torque of the DFIG is:

) . .

(

rd sq rq sd

em P

C =

ϕ ϕ

ϕ ϕ

(13)

With:

φs(d,q), φr(d,q) : Stator and rotor two-phase flow in the reference of PARK.

Is(d,q), Ir(d,q) : Stator currents and rotor in the reference of PARK.

Rs, Rr

:

Stator and rotor resistances.

Ls, Lr

:

Inductors cyclic stator and rotor.

M: Cyclic mutual inductance.

p : Number of machine pole pairs.

ωs

:

Pulsations of the stator electrical quantities.

ωr

:

Pulsations of the rotor electrical quantities.

5 Vector Control of DFIG by Orientation Flow Rotor

In this work we have proposed a vector control law for DFIG based on the orientation flow rotor. In this respect, it demonstrates the relations between the stator and rotor variables. These relations will allow the rotor to act on signals to control the exchange of active and reactive power between the rotor of the machine and the grid [11].

In this control, the flow rotor

ϕ

r is oriented in the direction axis d. Thus, we can write [12]:

u(1)^3

u(1)^3 Wind

1 J.s+f

[C_em]

[C_g]

[P_mec]

[C_aer]

[Omega_g]

R/Lamdba_opt (Ro*S*Cp_max)/2

1/G

1/G

1/G

1/G (Ro*S)/2

R [Beta]

[Omega_g]

lambda beta cp Cp(lambda,beta)

(5)

0

; =

=

r rq

rd

ϕ ϕ

ϕ

(14)

The expression of the flow rotor and the stator then becomes:









=

=

=

=

0 .

. . .

rq

M sr rd

rq sr

s r sq

rd s sr r rd sr s sd

I M

M I L L

I M L

L M

L

ϕ ϕ

σ ϕ

σ ϕ

ϕ

(15)

The expression of the electromagnetic torque then becomes [16]:

M rq s r sq

rd

em

P L L I I

C = ( ϕ . ϕ ) = − . . σ . .

(16) From the previous equation, we can derive the equations linking the rotor and stator voltages:



+ +

+ +

=

+

+ +

=



+

+

=

+ +

+ +

=

) .

. (

) .

(

. . .

sq rd sr r s s rq sr s r rq sr

r s r

s r s

s s

sr r rq

sd rq sr r

s rq sr

r r s r s s rd sr s r rd sr

r s s r s sr rd

rq sr r

s s rd s sr r s rq sr s r rq sr

r s r

s r s

sq

rq sr r

s rd sr s rq sr

r r s r s s rd sr s r rd sr

r s s r sd

V M I

L L dt dI M

L I L M

L L R R

L V M

V MV I R M

R L R L dt dI M

L I L M

L R L R L V M

MV I L M L

L dt dI M

L I L M

L L R R V

MV V R M I L M

R L R L dt dI M

L I L M

L R L V R

ω σ σ ω

ω ω ω

ω σ ω

σ ω

ω σ ω σ ω

ω ω

ω σ ω

σ ω

(17)

The vector control the DFIG allows us to express the expressions of active and reactive power as followings:





=

+

=

rq rd rd rq r

rq rq rd rd r

I V I V Q

I V I V P

. .

.

. (18)

We replace the Vrd and Vrq tensions in Pr and Qr are obtained:



 

=

+ +

=

rd rd r r

rd rd r rq r rd r r

I Q

I I

R I

R P

ϕ ω

ϕ ω

2 2

(19)

The power Pr is proportional to the current Irq if the flow is kept constant. We can then write:

rd r

rq rj

r

KI Q

KI P

P

=

=

− (20)

The variables references values are defined to control. Thus we have the rotor currents reference.

K I Q

K I P

r rd

r rq

*

*

*

*

=

= (21)

6 Current Control

The current control ensures voltage regulation of the DC bus and control power factor of the grid side.

The objective of the control is to maintain the voltage of DC bus constant while absorbing a current to be sinusoidal as possible, with the possibility of the grid side the power factor adjustment. The grid side converter is controlled such that the active power and reactive power grid side are written as follows [6]:

q m

d m

I U Q

I U P

2 . 3 2 . 3

=

= (21)

With, Um: is the amplitude of the phase voltage.

Applying the mesh law, we obtain the tension of the filter is written in matrix form in the "abc" plan.

dc n n n r

r V

d d d

I I I dt L d I I I R V V V

.

3 2 1

3 2 1

3 2 1

3 2 1





+





+





=





(22)

This gives the differential equation of continuous DC bus:

[

(2 1 2) 1 ( 1 2 2) 2

]

1 d d I d d I

C dt dV

n n n

n dc

dc = + + + (23)

With:

=

=



=

=

=

2 1 3

2 1 3 3

1

n n n

m

m nm dc

dc dc dc

d d d

I I et I

I d I

dt I C dV

The representation status of an inverter in the plan 'abc' is non-linear (variable in time). We use the PARK transformation plan “dq” to facilitate implantation and extraction of harmonics [13]:

[ ] [ ] [ ]





=







=







=



3 2 1

3 2 1

3 2 1

) (

; ) (

; ) (

I I I I P

I d d d d P

d V V V V P

V

q d

n n n

nq nd q

d θ θ θ

[

P

( θ ) ]

: Matrix Park

By applying the Park transformation to equation (22) and (23) we find the following relation

[ ]

+

=

+ +

+

=

+

+

=

q nq d nd dc dc

d r dc nq q r q r q

q r dc nd d r d r d

I d I C d

dt dV

I L V dt d

L dI I R V

I L V dt d

L dI I R V

1

. .

ω ω

(24)

The variables references values are defined to control. These are the reference voltages for the inverter.





=

=

d q q q

q d d d

e U V V

e U V V

*

*

(6)

With:



=

=



+

=

+

=

d r q

q r d

q r q r q

d r d r d

I L e

I L et e

dt L dI I R U

dt L dI I R U

ω ω

The general structure of the flow rotor orientation in a wind system is detailed in the figure below:

Figure 8. General structure of the orientation control the flow rotor applied to a wind system.

7 Simulation and Test Performance &

Discussion

The following figure presents the global model of the wind system is simulated in the

Matlab/Simulink/. The model consists: the wind turbine, the doubly fed induction generator (DFIG), two power converters that connect the rotor to the grid:

Figure 9. Simulation general diagram of the orientation control the flow rotor on Matlab / Simulink.

7.1 Response to Fixed Speed The study made for a constant wind speed of V=11m/s. as shown in the following figure:

Multiplier Shaft Rotor

Stator DFIG

Turbine Grid

C

Rectifier Inverter

AC

DC

= AC

DC

=

Park dq => abc Park

dq => abc ϴr

Rotor side converter V rq V *rd *

1/ω ϕr rq Pr*

1/ω ϕ r rd

Qr*

Ird*

+-

Ird

Irq*

+ - Irq

Converter side Grid V q V d* *

Id*

+-

Id

Iq*

+ - Iq

U q

U d U rd U rq

Vdc*

+-

Vdc

-1/((3/2)Um) 1/((3/2)Um)

Q* P*

R R R

ϴs

+ -

ϴm ϴ

Ome ga_g

be ta

Wind spe e d (m / s) Tm

Wind Turbine

[Vdc]

[wr]

[Idq_s]

[Idq_r]

[Ic_Grid]

[Ib_Grid]

[Te ] [Vdq_s]

[Ia_Grid]

t 1

Vdr

Vqr

Vd_Grid

Vq_Grid

Ia_Grid

Ib_Grid

Ic_Grid

Vdc Re ctifie r//Inve rte r P_re f

Q_re f

P_Grid

Q_Grid

Id_Grid

Iq_Grid

Idr

Iqr

Vdc

wr

Vdr

Vqr

Vd_Grid

Vq_Grid

Laws of controls [Id_Grid]

[Iq_Grid]

[Idr]

[Iqr]

[Vdc]

[Vdc]

[wr]

[W]

[Vdr]

[Vqs]

[Vqr]

[P_Gri d]

[Q_ref]

[Vds]

[Q_Gri d]

[Iqs]

[Ids]

[wr]

[Iqr]

[Idr]

[Ib_Gri d]

[Ia_Gri d]

[Te]

[Ic_Gri d]

[P_ref]

[Tm]

Ids Iqs Idr Iqr Ia_re se au Ib_re se au Ic_rese au Te Tm P_re f Q_re f P_re se au Q_re se au Vds Vqs Vdr Vqr w Vdc Di spl ays Tm

Vabc

Vdr

Vqr

wr

Idq_r

Idq_s

Vdq_s

Te DFIG be ta

Wind spe e d (m / s)

Vabc

P_ref

Q_ref

P_Grid

Q_Grid Control

(7)

Figure 10. Wind Constant profile

The following figures show the wind system performance at constant speed.

Figure 11. Turbine speed

(a)

(b)

Figure 12. (a)Turbine torque, (b) electromechanical torque.

(a)

(b)

Figure 13. (a) Power coefficient, (b) Power turbine.

(a)

(b)

Figure 14. Characteristics of the turbine: (b) lambda, (a) Phis

0 50 0 100 0 150 0 200 0

0 2 4 6 8 1011 12

Time (ms)

Wind speed (m/s)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

527 528 529 530

Time (ms)

Turbine speed

0 50 0 100 0 150 0 200 0

0 20 40 60 80

Time (ms)

Turbine torque

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 50 100

Time (ms)

electromechanical torque

0 250 500 1000 1500 2000

0.18 0.182 0.184 0.186 0.188

Time (ms)

Power coefficient

0 250 500 1000 1500 2000

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Time (ms)

Power Turbine

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 0.5 1

Time (ms)

Phis

0 500 1000 1500 2000

22.1 22.15 22.2 22.25

Time (ms) Lambda (λ)

(8)

(a)

(b)

Figure 15. (a) The Power Active, (b) Power Reactive of MADA

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 16. (a) Stator voltage and current in the plan “abc” (b) Zoom stator voltage in the plan "abc", (c) Zoom stator current in the plan

"abc".

It is observed that the grid currents are sinusoidal and in phase with the mains voltages, confirming that the inverter perfectly compensates the harmonic currents and the reactive power consumption on the one hand by the load and secondly the reactive power consumed by the DFIG. We also note that the frequency of the rotor currents is different from the frequency of the grid current. The DC bus voltage is perfectly maintained at its reference value to 1200V, as the rotor speed is regulated at 529.5 rad / s.

7.2 Response to a ramp

The wind system is supposed to functioning at its optimal point such as, at a wind speed V= 6 m/s, the optimal specific speed λopt=12, the maximum power coefficient Cp = 0.497 and the wind extracts maximum performance by the MPPT method. At time t = 0.5 s the wind changes speed as a ramp to another value V = 10 m / s for a simulation time as shown in the following figure:

Figure 17. Evolution of the wind speed.

Following Figures present the results obtained for this application of the wind.

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 200 400

Time (ms)

Active power Pr

Ps

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 200 400

Time (ms)

Reactive Power

0 500 1000 1500 2000

-200 -100 0 100 200

Time (ms)

Stator Voltage Vs and Current Is Is

Vs

1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 -200

-100 0 100 200

Time (ms)

Stator Voltage VsA

VsB VsC

0 500 1000 1500 2000

-50 0 50

Time (ms)

Stator Current Is

A

IsB

IsC

0 500 1000 1500 2000

5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Time (ms)

Wind speed

(9)

Figure 18. Turbine speed

(a)

(b)

Figure 19. (a) Turbine torque, (b) Electromechanical Power

(a)

(b)

Figure 20. (a) Power coefficient, (b) Pwer turbine.

(a)

(b)

Figure 21. Characteristics of the turbine :(a) lambda, (b) Phis.

(a)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

400 420 440 460 480

Time (ms)

Turbine speed

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 5 10 15 20 25

Time (ms)

Turbine torque

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 20 40 60 80 100

Time (ms)

Couple éctromécanique

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35

Time (ms)

Power coefficient

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 500 1000 1500 2000

Time (ms)

Power Turbine

0 500 1000 1500 2000

19.5 20 20.5 21 21.5 22

Time (ms) Lambda (λ)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Time (ms)

Phis

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 200 400 600 800

Time (ms)

Active power

Pr Ps

(10)

(b)

Figure 22. (a) Active Power, (b) Reactive Power of MADA

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 23. (a) Stator voltage and current in the plan “abc” (b) Zoom stator voltage in the plan "abc", (c) Zoom stator current in the plan

"abc".

In the case of this wind model, note that the wind system practically functions the same manner previous, the active and reactive stator powers fluctuate and oscillating around their values in the case of the model. This phenomenon is due to the electronic switch at the rotor converter. From these simulations, One can notice the robustness of the vector control in terms of decoupling and the good results achieved by regulating the classical PI corrector which adequately ensured the wind MPPT system.

7.3 Response to variable speed

We applied a random wind profile closer to the evolution of the real wind was filtered to suit the dynamics of the system studied. The objective is to see the degree of maximum power point tracking and effectiveness of speed control provided by the conventional PI.The system parameters are given in the annexes. A random wind profile is applied to the system Figure 10.

Figure 24. Profile of wind speed.

The following figures show the performance of the control system.

(a)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 2000 4000 6000

Reactive Power

Qr Qs

0 500 1000 1500 2000

-200 -100 0 100 200

Time (ms)

Voltage Vs and Current Is

Is

Vs

100 150 200

-200 -100 0 100 200

Time (ms)

Stator Voltage

VsA

VsB

VsC

100 150 200

-100 -50 0 50 100

Time (ms)

Stator Current Is

A

IsB Isc

0 10 20 30 40 50

0 2.5 5 7.5 10 12.5 15

Time (ms)

Wind speed (m / s)

0 500 1000 1500 2000

0 5 00 10 00

Ti me (ms)

Power Turbine

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

In this section, an analysis and interpretation of the results of the application of the sliding control to a wind system based on the DFIG will be presented as

The key goal of this work is to design a multi-rotor control system based on the proposed algorithms for controlling unmanned aerial vehicles during high-wind flight, supported by

Shows the results for case 1, (from the top) three-phase output voltages v s , and output currents i s , the average SM capacitor voltages and their respective reference values in

supplies due to high power consumption by individual elements and devices, which are located at a considerable distance from the control panel – voltage drops in the

Renewable energy sources used in the project should ensure the sufficient electricity volume for a family of four in the annual balance, but the stochastic nature of the energy

tracking(MPPT)) to improve the maximum power generation efficiency of distributed wind and solar power generation.The control algorithm mainly adopted the perturbation

The methanolic extract of the fruit flesh showed antimicrobial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Streptococcus pyogenes, but not against Staphylococcus aureus or

In the case of centralized generation, the hierarchical regulation or secondary voltage regulation (SVR) is guaranteed by coordinated voltage and reactive power controls in