References
1: ROMAGNO, D., et al. (2012) Where the brain appreciates the final state of an event: the
neural correlates of telicity. Brain & Language, 123(1):68-74.
2: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. (2005) Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge
University Press.
3: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. (2008) Investigations of the syntax-semantic-pragmatics interface.
Amsterdam: Benjamins.
4: FOLEY, W., VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. (1984) Functional Syntax and Universal Grammar.
Cambridge University Press.
5: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. (2000) Linguistic diversity and theoretical assumptions. Chicago
Linguistic Society Papers, 35:373-391.
6: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr., La Polla, R. J. (1997) Syntax: structure, meaning and function.
Cambridge University Press.
7: CHOMSKY, N. (1957) Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
8: CHOMSKY, N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
9: CHOMSKY, N. (1975) The logical structure of linguistic theory. New York and London:
Plenum Press.
10: CHOMSKY, N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding: the Pisa lectures. Holland:
Foris Publications.
11: CHOMSKY, N. (1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
12: DIXON, R. M. W. (1972) The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge
University Press.
13: FILLMORE, C. J. (1968) The case for case. In Bach & Harms (ed.), Universals in linguistic
theory. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
14: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. (2009) "Role and reference grammar" in Brisard, F., Östman, J. O.,
VERSCHUEREN, J., (eds.) Grammar, meaning and pragmatics. . Amsterdam: Benjamins.
15: DE SAUSSURE, F. (Baskin, W. tr.) (1959 (ed.)) Course in general linguistics. New York:
Philosophical Library.
16: VAN VALIN, R. D. Jr. (1977b) Ergativity and the universality of subjects. Chicago
Linguistic Society Papers, 13:689-705.
18: RIZZI, L. (1990) "Relativized Minimality" in Linguistic Inquiry Monographs, 16.
Cambridge: The MIT Press.
19: VENDLER, Z. (1967) Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
20: ARISTOTLE, Metaphysics, 1048b,
21: RYLE, G. (1949) The concept of mind. New York: Barnes & Noble.
22: BERTINETTO, P. M. (1986) Tempo, Aspetto e Azione nel verbo italiano. Firenze:
Accademia della Crusca.
23: COMRIE, B. (1976) Aspect. Cambridge University Press.
24: ROMAGNO, D. (2005) Il perfetto omerico. Pavia: Franco Angeli.
25: TALMY, L. (1983) "How language structures Space", in Pick, H. L., Acredolo, L. P.,
Space and Orientation: theory, research, and application. New York/London: Plenum Press. 26: LAKUSTA, L., et al. (2007) Conceptual Foundations of Spatial Language: Evidence for a
Goal Bias in Infants. Language Learning and Development, 3(3):179-197.
27: IHARA, H., FUJITA, I. (2000) "A cognitive approach to errors in case-marking in Japanese
agrammatism", in Foolen, A., Van Der Leek, F., Constructions in cognitive linguistics. . 28: ZHENG, M., GOLDIN-MEADOW, S. (2002) Thought before language: how deaf and hearing
children express motion events across cultures. Cognition, 85:145-175.
29: HODGSON, M. J. (2006) Telicity and the syntax-semantics of the object and subject.
Electronic Doctoral Dissertations for UMass Amherst. Paper AAI3242352. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations/AAI3242352.
30: CORBALLIS, M. C. (2002) From hand to mouth: the origins of language. Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
31: BONNOTTE, I. (2008) The role of semantic features in verb processing. J Psycholinguist
Res, 37:199-217.
32: CREPALDI, D., et al. (2011) A place for nouns and a place for verbs? A critical review of
neurocognitive data on grammatical-class effects. Brain & Language, 116(1):33-49.
33: BEDNY, M., et al. (2008) Concepts are more than percepts: The case of action verbs.
Journal of Neuroscience, 28:11347-11353.
34: BEDNY, M., et al. (2012) Typical neural representations of action verbs develop without
vision. Cerebral Cortex, 22(2):286-293.
35: WILLMS, J., et al. (2011) Language-invariant verb processing regions in Spanish–English
36: PERANI, D., et al. (1999) The neural correlates of verb and noun processing: PET study.
Brain, 112(12):2337-2344.
37: MESTRES-MISSÉ, A., et al. (2010) Neural differences in the mapping of verb and noun
concepts onto novel words. Neuroimage, 49:2826–2835.
38: TYLER, L. K., et al. (2008) Cortical differentiation for nouns and verbs depends on
grammatical markers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(8):1381-1389.
39: RODRIGUEZ-FERREIRO, J., et al. (2011) Neural correlates of abstract verb processing.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1):106:118.
40: BURTON, M., et al. (2009) Functional neuroimaging of grammatical class: Ambiguous
and unambiguous nouns and verbs. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(2):. 41: ZARCONE, A., LENCI, A., Priming effects on event types classification, 2010
42: BATIUKOVA, O., et al. (2012) Semantic priming study of russian aspect and resultativity.
The Russian Verb: in Oslo Studies in Language, 4:177-206.
43: BONNOTTE, I., FAYOL, M. (1997) Cognitive representations of predicates: the use of past
tenses in French. First Language, 17:75-101.
44: BEDNY, M., et al. (2011) Language processing in the occipital cortex of congenitally
blind adults. PNAS, 108(11):4429-4434.
45: SHETREET, E., et al. (2010) The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 22:2306-2315.
46: VERKUYL, H. (1972) On the compositional nature of the aspects.. Dordrecht: Reidel.
47: TENNY, C. (1994) Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht/
Boston/London: Kluwer..
48: BERTINETTO, P.M., et al., Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell'Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS),
2005, http://linguistica.sns.it/CoLFIS/CoLFIS_home.htm
49: BRADLEY, M. M., LANG, P. J. (1994) Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin
and Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 25(1):49-59.
50: VIGLIOCCO, G., et al. (2011) Nouns and verbs in the brain: a review. Neurosci. Biobehav.
Rev, 35:407-426.
51: OGAWA, S., et al. (1990) Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on
blood oxygenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 87(24):9868-9872.
52: HILL, H., et al. (2002) Automatic vs. controlled processes in semantic priming —
44:197-218.
53: BENVENISTE, E. (1966) Problèmes de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Gallimard.
54: BESTMANN, S., et al (2008) Mapping causal interregional influences with concurrent
TMS–fMRI. Experimental Brain Research, 191:383-402.
55: HARRIS, J. A., et al. (2008) The Functional Effect of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation:
Signal Suppression or Neural Noise Generation?. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(4):734-740.
56: KAMINSKI, J. A., et al. (2011) Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intensities in Cognitive
Paradigms. PloS ONE, 6(9):e24836.
57: MANENTI, R., et al. (2010) The Neural Bases of Word Encoding and Retrieval: A
fMRI-Guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study. Brain Topography, 22:318-332.
58: PAPEO, L., et al. (2009) Effects of TMS on Different Stages of Motor and Non- Motor
Verb Processing in the Primary Motor Cortex. PLoS ONE, 4(2):e4508.
59: PAPEO, L., et al. (2011) “She” is not like “I”: The tie between language and action is in
our imagination. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12):3939-3948.
60: PASHUT, T., et al. (2011) Mechanisms of Magnetic Stimulation of Central Nervous
System Neurons. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(3):e1002022.
61: ROBERTSON, E. M., et al. (2003) Studies in Cognition: The Problems Solved and Created
by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(7):948-960. 62: SIEBNER, H. R., et al. (2009) How does transcranial magnetic stimulation modify
neuronal activity in the brain? - Implications for studies of cognition. Cortex, 45(9):1035-1042.
63: WALSH, V., RUSHWORTH, M. (1999) A primer of magnetic stimulation as a tool for
