• Non ci sono risultati.

CLINICAL FEATURES GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS Cherubism

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "CLINICAL FEATURES GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS Cherubism"

Copied!
4
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

In 1933, Jones first described familial occurrence of painless enlargement of the jaws in three siblings. Jones later in 1938 reported observations on the same family under the title “famil- ial multilocular cystic disease of the jaws” and coined the term

“cherubism” after the cherubs of Renaissance art for the full round cheeks and the upward cast of the eyes giving the chil- dren a peculiarly grotesque, cherubic appearance.

GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS

1. Inheritance

a. Autosomal dominant b. Familial in 80% of cases

c. Males affected twice as often as females d. 80% overall penetrance

i. 100% in males ii. 50–70% in females e. Variable expressivity 2. Cause

a. Caused by mutations in the gene encoding c-Abl- binding protein SH3BP2

b. Gene for cherubism mapped to chromosome region 4p16.3

CLINICAL FEATURES

1. Variable size of the jaw lesions in cherubism a. Minor lesions of both jaws

b. Massive involvement of both jaws 2. Natural history:

a. Classically normal at birth

b. Onset usually between 14 months and 5 years.

However, the severe cases are evident at birth c. Progresses until puberty

d. Usually progression stops after puberty

e. Regression of the bone lesions (involution of the dis- ease) without treatment in some cases

f. Rapidly growing and extensively deforming lesions of the maxilla and the mandible including the coro- noids and condyles in severely affected individuals 3. Characteristic ‘eyes raised to heaven’ cherubic appearance:

an appearance of the cherubs portrayed in Renaissance art a. Fullness of the lower half of the face (cheeks and jaw) b. Retraction of the lower lids by the stretched skin over the cheeks pulling down the lower eyelids.

Consequently, a thin line of sclera is exposed beneath the iris and the eyes appear to be raised heavenward in a manner reminiscent of a “the cherubs in Renaissance paintings”

4. Painless hard enlargement of the jaws 5. Exclusively affecting maxilla and mandible

a. Mandible usually involved

b. Involvement of the maxilla in 60% of cases

c. Painless lesions

d. Bilateral enlargement with loss of bone in the jaws and its replacement with large amount of fibrous tissue e. Dental effect by bone lesion

i. Premature loss of deciduous teeth ii. Displacement of permanent dentition

f. Swelling usually abates by the third decade, whereas radiographic changes commonly persist into the fourth decade

6. Submandibular lymph node enlargement in 45% of cases 7. Ocular manifestations

a. Lower lid retraction b. Proptosis

c. Diplopia

d. Globe displacement

e. Visual loss due to optic nerve atrophy f. Rare extension of lesion into the orbits 8. Rare upper airway involvement

a. Displaced tongue affecting speech, mastication, swal- lowing, and respiration

b. Obstructive apnea

9. Extremely rare extrafacial skeletal involvement a. Upper humerus

b. Bilateral triquetral bones c. Anterior ribs

d. Upper femoral necks 10. Rare associated syndromes

a. Noonan syndrome (Addante, 1996) b. Ramon syndrome

i. Cherubism ii. Short stature iii. Mental retardation

iv. Gingival fibromatosis v. Epilepsy

c. Fragile X syndrome d. Craniosynostosis 11. Functional impairment

a. Mastication problems b. Speech difficulty c. Tooth alteration d. Loss of normal vision 12. Psychological consequences 13. Differential diagnosis

a. Four main types of fibrous dysplasia

i. Monostotic fibrous dysplasia: only one bone is affected

ii. Polyostotic: multiple bones are affected iii. McCune-Albright syndrome

a) Polyostotic form

b) Accompanied by pigmentary lesions c) Endocrine dysfunction presenting as preco-

cious puberty in females

iv. Craniofacial form of fibrous dysplasia 153

Cherubism

(2)

154 CHERUBISM

a) Only bones of the craniofacial complex are affected

b) Onset in the second decade in majority of patients

c) Generally unilateral lesions, tend to become static once skeletal maturity is reached d) Clinically difficult to differentiate from

cherubism if the skeletal abnormalities are localized to the jaws

e) Molecularly different from cherubism b. Infantile cortical hyperostosis

i. Diagnosed in the first 6 months of life

ii. Radiographically does not produce cystic areas iii. Characterized by thickening of the mandibular

lower border

iv. Does not have bilateral expression

c. Osteitis fibrosa cystica secondary to hyperparathy- roidism

i. Increased serum alkaline phosphatase ii. Increased serum calcium

iii. Decreased serum phosphorus iv. Increased urinary phosphorus d. Various tumors of the jaws

DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS

1. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels may be elevated 2. Radiography

a. Extensive involvement of the mandible and the maxilla b. Multilocular radiolucent areas in the mandible and

maxilla with expansion of the bony cortex i. Often very extensive

ii. With a few irregular bony septa

iii. Multilocular rarefactions replaced by sclerosis with progressive calcification in the adult c. Absent and displaced teeth in the involved areas 3. CT scan

a. Superior in making the diagnosis b. Determining the degree of severity 4. Histological changes in cherubism

a. Replacement of the normal bony architecture with pro- liferating fibrous tissue containing numerous giant cells b. Mononuclear fibroblastic stroma

i. Nonneoplastic fibrous lesions rich in multinucle- ated giant cells identified as osteoclasts

ii. Irregular bone formation

c. A peculiar perivascular cuffing of collagen: consid- ered by some to be pathognomonic for the condition d. Histological resemblance to the following disorders:

i. Giant cell tumor ii. Giant cell granulomas iii. Ossifying fibroma

iv. Fibrous dysplasia of the jaw v. Paget disease of bone

5. Molecular genetic analysis: detection of a SH3BP2 gene mutation by sequencing of select exons or entire coding region is available clinically

GENETIC COUNSELING

1. Recurrence risk

a. Patient’s sib: not increased unless a parent is affected b. Patient’s offspring: 50%

2. Prenatal diagnosis

a. Ultrasonography: not possible since the lesion is post- natal in nature

b. Molecular analysis possible on fetal DNA obtained by amniocentesis or CVS if the disease-causing muta- tion is identified in an affected family member 3. Management

a. Observation

i. Generally self-limiting lesions and subside with age

ii. Surgical intervention required only in cases with esthetic or functional problems

b. Tracheostomy to secure the airway for upper airway obstruction

c. Teeth extraction from the sites of fibrous changes d. Curettage alone or in combination with surgical con-

touring: considered the treatment of choice

e. Resection of the orbital lesions may be required to improve visual impairment

f. Prompt recurrence likely if surgery is performed at an early age

g. Radiation therapy ineffective and contraindicated in view of the following risks:

i. Osteoradionecrosis

ii. Interference with dentofacial growth and devel- opment

iii. Affect on future surgical procedures

h. Experimental use of calcitonin to treat cherubism described recently

REFERENCES

Ayoub AF, El-Mofty SS: Cherubism: report of an aggressive case and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:702–705, 1993.

Battaglia A, Merati A, Magit A: Cherubism and upper airway obstruction.

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 122:573–574, 2000.

Bianchi SD, Boccardi A, Mela F, et al.: The computed tomographic appear- ances of cherubism. Skeletal Radiol 16:6–10, 1987.

Caballero Herrera R, Vinals Iglesias H: Cherubism: a study of three genera- tions. Medicina Oral 3:163–171, 1998.

Caffey J, Williams JL: Familial fibrous swelling of the jaws. Radiology 56:

1–5, 1951.

Carroll AL, Sullivan TJ: Orbital involvement in cherubism. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 29:38–40, 2001.

Colombo F, Cursiefen C, Neukam FW, et al.: Orbital involvement in cheru- bism. Ophthalmology 108:1884–1888, 2001.

Dunlap C, Neville B, Vickers RA, et al.: The Noonan syndrome/cherubism association. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 67:698–705, 1989.

Faircloth WJ, Edwards RC, Farhood VW: Cherubism involving a mother and daughter: case reports and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49:535–542, 1991.

Hart W, Schweitzer DH, Slootweg PJ, et al.: Een man met cherubisme. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 144:34–38, 2000.

Hitomi G, Nishide N, Mitsui K: Cherubism: diagnostic imaging and review of the literature in Japan. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 81:623–628, 1996.

(3)

CHERUBISM 155

Imai Y, Kanno K, Moriya T, et al.: A missense mutation in the SH3BP2 gene on chromosome 4p16.3 found in a case of nonfamilial cherubism. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:632–638, 2003.

Jones WA: Familial multilocular cystic disease of the jaws. Am J Cancer 17:946–950, 1933.

Jones WA: Cherubism. Oral Surg 20:648–653, 1965.

Jones WA: Further observations regarding familial multilocular cystic disease of the jaws. Br J Radiol 11:227–240, 1938.

Jones WA, Gerrie J, Pritchard J (1950). Cherubism-familial fibrous displasia of the jaws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32b:334–347, 1950.

Katz JO, Dunlap CL, Ennis RLJ (1992). Cherubism: report of a case showing regression without treatment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50:301–303, 1992.

Kaugars GE, Niamtu III J, Svirsky JA: Cherubism: diagnosis, treatment, and comparison with central giant cell granulomas and giant cell tumors. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73:369–374, 1992.

Khosla VM, Korobkin M: Cherubism. Am J Dis Child 120:458–461, 1970.

Kozakiewicz M, Perczynska-Partyka W, Kobos J: Cherubism-clinical picture and treatment. Oral Dis 7:123–130, 2001.

Lo B, Faiyaz-Ul-Haque M, Kennedy S, et al.: Novel mutation in the gene encoding c-Abl-binding protein SH3BP2 causes cherubism. Am J Med Genet 121A:37–40, 2003.

Mangion J, Rahman N, Edkins S, et al.: The gene for cherubism maps to chro- mosome 4p16.3. Am J Hum Genet 65:151–157, 1999.

Mangion J, Edkins S, Goss AN, et al.: Familial craniofacial fibrous dysplasia:

absence of linkage to GNAS1 and the gene for cherubism. J Med Genet 37:E37, 2000.

Peters WJN: Cherubism: a study of twenty cases from one family. Oral Surg 47:307–311, 1979.

Ramon Y, Engelberg IS: An unusually extensive case of cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:325–328, 1986.

Silver EC, de Souza PEA, Barreto DC, et al.: An extreme case of cherubism.

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:45–48, 2002.

Southgate J, Sarma U, Townend JV, et al.: Study of the cell biology and bio- chemistry of cherubism. J Clin Pathol 51:831–837, 1998.

Tiziani V, Reichenberger E, Buzzo CL, et al.: The gene for cherubism maps to chromosome 4p16. Am J Hum Genet 65:158–166, 1999.

Ueki Y, Tiziani V, Santanna C, et al.: Mutations in the gene encoding c-Abl-bind- ing protein SH3BP2 cause cherubism. Nature Genet 28:125–126, 2001.

Wada S, Udagawa N, Nagata N, et al.: Calcitonin receptor down-regulation relates to calcitonin resistance in mature mouse osteoclast. Endocrinology 137:1042–1048, 1996.

Zachariades N, Papanicolaou S, Xypolyta A, et al.: Cherubism. Int J Oral Surg 14:138–145, 1985.

Zohar Y, Grausbord R, Shabtai F, et al.: Fibrous dysplasia and cherubism as an hereditary familial disease: follow-up of four generations. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 17:340–344, 1989.

(4)

156 CHERUBISM

Fig. 1. A boy with cherubism showing full cheeks and jaw and the retraction of the lower eyelids with symmetrical augmentation on both mandibular angles.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

ii. When the spouse is affected with another domi- nantly inherited skeletal dysplasia caused by a known gene mutation: testing for the known mutation for that skeletal dysplasia

Missense mutations in the TNSALP gene have been observed in some hypophosphatasia kindreds, partic- ularly those families with the more severe perinatal and infantile forms of

Achondrogenesis type I was further subdivided, on the basis of convincing histo- logical criteria, into type IA, which has apparently normal car- tilage matrix but inclusions

Nicolaides KH, Snijders RJM, Chen HH, et al.: Fetal gastrointestinal and abdominal wall defects: Associated malformations and chromosomal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther

somal recessive i. Autosomal recessive ii. Basic defects: absence or defective function of osteoclasts results in defective remodeling of bone with partial or complete obliteration

Jansen T, Romiti R: Progeria infantum (Hutchinson-Gilford syndrome) associ- ated with scleroderma-like lesions and acro-osteolysis: a case report and brief review of the literature..

Cohn DH, Briggs MD, King LM, et al.: Mutations in the cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP) gene in pseudoachondroplasia and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia.. A

Most patients share the features of del(18q) syndrome, which are highly variable depending on the extent of the terminal or interstitial 18q deletion:a. Prominent antihelix