• Non ci sono risultati.

Durata ottimale della chemioterapia adiuvante nei tumori del Colon

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Durata ottimale della chemioterapia adiuvante nei tumori del Colon"

Copied!
35
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Hot Topic in tema di neoplasie del Colon:

Durata ottimale della chemioterapia adiuvante nei tumori del Colon

Daniele Rossini

U.O. di Oncologia Medica Universitaria Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana

Istituto Toscano Tumori

Convegno Nazionale AIOM Giovani 2018 News in Oncology

(2)

STAGE

Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer

II III

Low risk High risk

Follow up Fluoropyrimidine (not in MSI-H)

FOLFOX or XELOX

Or consider FOLFOX or

XELOX Or consider

Fluoropyrimidine in MSS

Or consider Fluoropyrimidine

AIOM Guidelines 2017

(3)

Adjuvant Therapy for Colon Cancer Stage III

Stage III CRC pts fit for fluropyrimidine+oxaliplatin

Adjuvant chemo (fp+oxa)

cured by surgery 50%

alone

cured by surgery 25%

and chemo

relapsed despite 25%

surgery and chemo

Courtesy of C. Antoniotti Adapted from Meyerhardt et al, ASCO Ann Meet 2017

(4)

Neurotox in MOSAIC: How much?

Andrè et al, JCO 2009

• Grade 3 peripheral sensory

neuropathy during treatment was 12.5% (0.2% of the patients in the LV5FU2 group)

• 18 months: 24.1% had symptoms of any grade

• 0.7% reporting grade 3 symptoms.

• At 48 months: 15,4 % had symptoms of any grade

• 0.7% reporting grade 3 symptoms

(5)

Chapter One:

We Have an IDEA

(6)

Less is

(7)

IDEA Collaboration

What is the IDEA Collaboration?

Prospective

Pooled Analysis

6 Phase III Trials

For Patients with

Stage III Colon Cancer

(8)

Study Design

Stage III Prior surgey

R 1:1

3 months

6 months

Investigator’s choice

FOLFOX or CAPOX

(9)

IDEA: Who?

Trials (Group)

N Patients (N=12834)

Stage Tumor

Location

Treatments Additional trial-specific

comparison

Median follow-up

time, m

TOSCA 2402 III

II High-Risk

Colon FOLFOX4 CAPOX

FOLFOX4+Be v vs FOLFOX alone

62

SCOT 3983 III

II High-Risk

Colon Rectum

mFOLFOX6 CAPOX

None 37

IDEA France 2010 III Colon mFOLFOX6

CAPOX

None 51

C80702 2440 III Colon mFOLFOX6 3 y of

celecoxib vs placebo

35

HORG 708 III

II High-Risk

Colon FOLFOX4 CAPOX

None 48

ACHIEVE 1291 III Colon mFOLFOX6

CAPOX

None 37

Total N Pts (Stage III):

12834

(10)

Rationale for Non-inferiority Margin

Piaggio, et al, Jama 2012

IDEA Consensus (Oncology and Patient Advocates) 12% relative risk increase (upper 95% CI)

Non-Inferiority Margin: DFS HR=1.12

(11)

Statistical Design

Primary Endpoint: disease-free survival (DFS)

Time from date of randomization (enrollment) to the earliest date of relapse, secondary colorectal primary tumor, or death due to all causes

Primary Analysis Population: Modified Intent-to-treat: randomized and received any dose of treatment

Pre-planned Subgroup Analyses:

Regimen

T/N Stage

(12)

Results: Adverse Events

Grothey et al., NEJM 2018

But also: Neutropenia, Febrile Neutropenia, Thrombocytopenia, Nausea, Mucositis, Fatigue and Hand-foot syndrome

(13)

Qian Shi, et al, ASCO 2017

Results – DFS

(14)

Results – DFS

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018 3 years DFS 74.6% vs 75.5%

HR: 1.07

95% CI (1.00- 1.15) P for not inferiority=0.11

(15)

Chapter Two:

Dissecting an IDEA

(16)

Preplanned Analysis

Two preplanned analysis:

• Regimen

• T/N

(17)

Results – Preplanned Analyses: T/N

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018

Favors 6m Favors 3m

(18)

Preplanned Analysis - Regimen

Qian Shi, et al, ASCO 2017

(19)

FOLFOX vs CAPOX

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018

Patients are not stratified for regimen

(20)

Results – Preplanned Analyses: T/N

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018

Favors 6m Favors 3m

(21)

Results – Recap

• The DFS non-inferiority of 3m oxaliplatin-based adjuvant

treatment was not

established in overall stage III colon cancer

• DFS comparison by T/N showed no differences

• DFS comparison by regimen showed that CAPOX is not

FOLFOX

HR < 1.12

(22)

Chapter Three:

Finding an IDEA

(23)

Results – Subgroup Analyses: Risk Groups

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018

(24)

Stratification: high vs low risk

Are high and low risk pts are balanced between the two treatment arms?

SCOT trial TOSCA trial

IDEA France

(25)

What is IDEA message?

(26)

IDEA recommendations

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018

(27)

IDEA recommendations

Grothey et al, NEJM 2018

(28)

NCCN Guidelines

NCCN Guidelines v2.2018

(29)

My clinical practice in stage III

Choose CAPOX

T4 or N2: 6 months

T3N1:

1) Plan 6 months

2) At least 3 months of CAPOX or FOLFOX

If Neurotox G2-3 develops, then hold oxaliplatin.

(30)

Chapter Four:

A new IDEA

(31)

Role of Time

Gao et al. BMC 2018 Turner et al. J Am Co Sur 2018

Stage III

N=18491 Stage III

N=72057

(32)

Role of MMR Status, Histology and BRAF Status

Zaanan et al. Jama Oncol 2018; Soliman et al. Dis Colon Rectum 2018; Andrè JCO 2015

(33)

Liquid biopsy in Stage III

Tie et al, ASCO 2018 Stage III

(34)

Primary endpoint: To demonstrate that a chemotherapy decision based on the presence or absence of circulating tumour DNA after surgery, will be more effective than standard of care treatment.

DYNAMIC-III trial

(35)

- In stage III, 3 months of oxaliplatin based therapy is not inferior than 6 months.

- In low risk of stage III, the

oncologists can discuss potential trade-offs between side effects and efficacy of adjuvant therapy.

- cfDNA could be useful in the future to guide the adjuvant decision.

Take home message

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

In a randomized trial it was demonstrated that ASI, using autologous tumor cells and BCG, had a significant clinical benefit in the adjuvant treatment of stage II colon cancer..

As judged by immunofluorescence with TS2/16 mAb, 28 6 9% C2C12 myoblasts, 19 6 6% REF fibroblasts, and 31 6 14% NIH 3T3 cells (either wild-type or transfected with activated Ha-Ras

Among them MSI status (microsatellite instability) has already been shown to in fluence survival and response to adjuvant infusional 5-FU in colon cancer patients ( Sargent et al.,

The main topics presented are an improved measurement technique for moving structures velocities, an image processing method for denoising and reconstruction of jet images

malattia espressa secondo gli indici clinici compositi (Indian Takayasu activity Score (ITAS) e KERR) poiché dimostra ipercaptazione significativa (grado&gt;2 in almeno un

Figure 3 plots the relative mean difference between the consensus values of a group of epistemic peers and a group whose members “approximately” treat each other as epistemic

Such functional approaches based on constant soil water diffusivity have been used by Passioura (1991) to explore the effects of differences in macroscopic soil structure on

When we matched the clinical data of the whole patients cohort with molecular alterations, we found a trend towards a better prognosis for patients with MSI than for