ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Plant
Science
jo u r n al h om ep ag e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / p l a n t s c i
Plastidic
P2
glucose-6P
dehydrogenase
from
poplar
is
modulated
by
thioredoxin
m-type:
Distinct
roles
of
cysteine
residues
in
redox
regulation
and
NADPH
inhibition
Manuela
Cardi
a,
Mirko
Zaffagnini
b,
Alessia
De
Lillo
a,
Daniela
Castiglia
a,
Kamel
Chibani
c,d,1,
José
Manuel
Gualberto
e,
Nicolas
Rouhier
c,d,
Jean-Pierre
Jacquot
c,d,
Sergio
Esposito
a,∗aDipartimentodiBiologia,Univ.diNapoli“FedericoII”,I-80126Napoli,Italy bDipartimentodiFarmaciaeBiotecnologie,Univ.diBologna,I-40126Bologna,Italy
cUniversitédeLorraine,UMR1136InteractionsArbres/Microorganismes,FacultédesSciencesetTechnologies,54506,Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy,France dINRA,UMR1136InteractionsArbres/Microorganismes,CentreINRANancyLorraine,54280,Champenoux,France
eUniversitédeStrasbourg,InstitutdeBiologieMoléculaireDesPlantes(IBMP),CNRS-UPR2357,67084Strasbourg,France
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received13June2016
Receivedinrevisedform1August2016 Accepted7August2016
Availableonline8August2016 Keywords:
Cysteine
Oxidativepentosephosphatepathway Populus
Thioredoxins
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
AcDNAcodingforaplastidicP2-typeG6PDHisoformfrompoplar(Populustremulaxtremuloides)has
beenusedtoexpressandpurifytohomogeneitythematurerecombinantproteinwithaN-terminus
His-tag.Thestudyofthekineticpropertiesoftherecombinantenzymeshowedaninvitroredoxsensing
modulationexertedbyreducedDTT.Theinteractionwiththioredoxins(TRXs)wastheninvestigated.
Fivecysteinetoserinevariants(C145S–C175S–C183S–C195S–C242S)andavariantwitha
dou-blesubstitutionforCys175andCys183(C175S/C183S)havebeengenerated,purifiedandbiochemically
characterizedinordertoinvestigatethespecificrole(s)ofcysteinesintermsofredoxregulationand
NADPH-dependentinhibition.
Threecysteineresidues(C145,C194,C242)aresuggestedtohavearoleincontrollingtheNADP+access
totheactivesite,andinstabilizingtheNADPHregulatorybindingsite.
OurresultsalsoindicatethattheregulatorydisulfideinvolvesresiduesCys175andCys183inaposition
similartothoseofchloroplasticP1-G6PDHs,butthemodulationisexertedprimarilybyTRXm-type,in
contrasttoP1-G6PDH,whichisregulatedbyTRXf.
Thisunexpectedspecificityindicatesdifferencesinthemechanismofregulation,andredoxsensingof
plastidicP2-G6PDHcomparedtochloroplasticP1-G6PDHinhigherplants.
©2016ElsevierIrelandLtd.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH – EC 1.1.1.49) catalyzes the oxidation of glucose-6-phosphate (G6P) to 6-phospho-glucono-␦-lactone, with the concomitant reduction of
Abbreviations: DTT, dithiothreitol; EDTA, ethylene diaminetetraacetic acid; OPPP, oxidativepentose phosphate pathway; Tris, tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane;TRX,thioredoxin.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:DipartimentodiBiologia,UniversitàdiNapoli “Fed-ericoII”,ComplessoUniversitariodiMonteSant’Angelo,ViaCinthia4,80126Naples, Italy.
E-mailaddress:sergio.esposito@unina.it(S.Esposito).
1 Presentaddress:CEITEC—CentralEuropeanInstituteofTechnology, ˇZerotínovo
nám.9,60177Brno,CzechRepublic.
NADP+toNADPH.Thisenzymeisthekeyregulatorofthe Oxida-tivePentosePhosphatePathway(OPPP),aubiquitousmetabolic pathwayinEukaryathatprovidesanalternativerouteto glycoly-sisforG6Poxidation[1].TherearegenerallyfourG6PDHgenesin photosyntheticorganisms(onecodingforacytosolicproteinand thethreeothersforchloroplasticisoforms)asreportedrecentlyin Heveabrasiliensisby[2].
Inthelastyears,considerableworkhasbeenmadeto investi-gatethebiochemicalandregulatoryfeaturesofdifferentG6PDH isoforms fromhigher plants: cytosolic (Cy-G6PDH), chloroplas-tic(P1-G6PDH)andplastidicisoforms(P2-G6PDH),thelasttwo beingexpressedinphotosyntheticandnon-photosynthetictissues, respectively[1,3,4].
Cy-G6PDHwas demonstrated toberedox-insensitive, and a recent studyby[5] demonstratedthat thecytosolic Arabidopsis
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.08.003 0168-9452/©2016ElsevierIrelandLtd.Allrightsreserved.
abscissicacid(ABA)respondingpathwayhasbeenrecently con-firmedintomatoplantssubjecttodrought[6].Cy-G6PDHhasalso beenreportedashavingapositiveroleinresponsetoabioticstress insugarcane[7].
Similarphosphorylationmechanism(s)and associatedkinase havenotbeenidentified,orlinked,toeitherP1-orP2-G6PDHsso far.Infact,theactivityofP1-G6PDH(chloroplastic)isredox sen-sitive,beinginhibitedinvitrobyreduceddithiothreitol(DTT)in adose-andtime-dependentmanner[8].Theredoxregulationof P1-G6PDHthroughdithiol-disulfideexchangereactionswaslater confirmedbothinplants[8,9]andalgae[10].
Redoxmodulationinvolvesthioredoxins(TRXs)asredox cata-lystsandallowsG6PDHinhibitionunderreducingconditions(i.e. underillumination),andfullactivationinthedark,whenthe pro-teinisoxidized.Morerecently,theformationofadisulfidebond betweenCys149andCys157inArabidopsisP1-G6PDHwas demon-stratedtobecrucialinthepositioningofArg131,playingacentral roleinthedockingofNADP+inthebindingsiteofthechloroplastic isoform[11].
P1-G6PDHistheonlyplastidicenzymeredox-regulatedinsuch awaythatitsactivityincreasesinthedark,contrarytowhathas beendescribedforseveralenzymesoftheCalvin-Bensoncycle[12]. Thisoppositeregulationisbelievedtopreventcarbohydrate break-downanddegradationofsugarsbyOPPPinthelight,whichcould competewithphotosyntheticCO2fixation,thuswastingenergyin afutileway[1,13].
Thephysiological roles of chloroplasticP1-G6PDH and plas-tidicP2-G6PDHaredistinct.ThechloroplasticP1-G6PDHisoform provides NADPH in photosynthetic tissues in the dark, when theCalvin-Benson cycle is halted, thus sustaining basal carbon metabolisminthenight.Incontrast,theplastidicP2-G6DPHplays akeyrole inplantrootmetabolism,beinginvolved indifferent basalprocesses, suchas furnishingof intermediatesfor nucleic acidmetabolisminheterotrophicconditions;orduringnitrogen assimilation[14–16];orinresponsetostress[17–19].
Thegenescodingforthesechloroplasticandplastidicisoforms clusterintwodistinctclassesandthecorrespondingisoformscan bedistinguishedbytheiraffinitiestowardssubstrateand cofac-tor(G6PandNADP+),andtheextentoftheirinhibitionbyNADPH at least in potato and barley [3,8,13,20]. It has been generally observed that P1-G6PDH is strongly inhibited by NADPH (e.g.
lowKiNADPH),whereas P2-G6PDHisoformsaresignificantly less
sensitivetoNADPHinhibition[1,3,20,21].Despite theirmarked differencetowardsNADPHinhibition[13],theconsequenceand influenceoftheredoxstateontheirresponsetoNADPHarenot clearlydefinedyet.
Inthisstudy,weinvestigatedtheredoxsensitivityofplastidic P2-G6PDHandtheinfluenceoftheredoxstateonenzymeactivity. Todo that,we have produced and purified tohomogeneity wild-typeandcysteine variantsofP2-G6PDH andcharacterized themwithrespecttodithiol/disulfideexchangereactions, NADPH-dependentinhibition and specificity towards differentplastidic TRXs.
AmodelfortheregulationoftheP2-G6PDHisoforminhigher plantsisprovided.
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Cloning,expressionandpurificationofpoplarP2-G6PDHand site-directedmutagenesis
Thesequence encoding the plastidicP2-G6PDH from poplar (Potri.001G059900)wasamplifiedfromaPopulustremulax
tremu-tionsites(underlinedintheprimers)ofpET15bexpressionvector (Novagen).Thesequence encodesaproteindeprivedofthefirst 66aminoacidscorrespondingtotheputativetargetingpeptide,as comparedtootherknownplastidicP2-G6PDHfromhigherplants (Fig.1A).InthepET15b/P2-G6PDHconstruct,thecDNAsequence forP2-G6PDHwasinframewithanN-terminalHis-tag.
Usingtwocomplementarymutagenicprimers,the5cysteines (Cys145,Cys175,Cys183,Cys194 andCys242)ofPtP2-G6PDHwere individuallysubstitutedintoserines,andadoublemutantinwhich Cys175−Cys183aremutagenizedintoserineswasalsogenerated. TheprimersusedarelistedinSupplementalTable1.Allplasmids weresequencedtochecktheintroductionofthedesiredmutations andverifythatnoadditionalmutationswereintroduced.
Forproteinexpression,E.coliBL21(DE3)pSBETstrainwas chem-icallytransformedwiththedifferentrecombinantvectorsallowing expressionofPtP2-G6PDHWTandcysteinemutants P2-G6PDH-C145S (C145S), P2-G6PDH-C175S (C175S), P2-G6PDH-C183S (C183S),P2-G6PDH-C193S(C193S),P2-G6PDH-C242S(C242S),and P2-G6PDH-C175S/C183S(C175S/C183S).Singlecoloniesresistant toampicillinandkanamycinweregrownin100mlofLBmedium inthepresenceofampicillin(50mg/ml)andkanamycin(50mg/ml) overnightat37◦Cinaerobiosis.Afterincubation,theculturewas then transferred in 2.5l of LB medium. When OD600 reached 0.6, protein expressionwas inducedby 100M isopropyl- -d-thiogalactopyanoside.Bacteriaweregrownat20◦Covernightwith continuous gentle shaking, and collected by centrifugation for 20minat7000xg.Thepelletwasresuspendedinbuffer[50mM potassiumphosphate,0.3MNaCl,10mMimidazole,(pH8.0)and cellslysedbysonication.Bacterialysateswerecentrifuged45min at20,000xg.Allthesubsequentstepswereperformedat2–6◦C withthesupernatant.
Theextractwasfiltered(0.22m)andappliedontoaGE Health-careHiTrapFFcrudecolumn(5ml)connectedtoanAKTAPrime plussystem(GEHealthcare).Proteinpurificationwasperformed accordingtothemanufacturer’sinstructions.
Elutedfractions (1ml) wereassayedfor G6PDH activityand activefractionswerecollected,pooledanddesaltedusingPD-10 columns(GeHealthcare)in30mMTris-HCl,100mMNaCl,5% glyc-erol, pH8.0.Proteinconcentrations weredeterminedusingthe Coomassieproteinassaybased(Bio-Rad),withbovineserum albu-minasthestandard.
Thepurifiedenzymeshoweda specificactivityof8000Umg prot−1 (Table1), andmaintained97%ofitsactivityafter7days, whenstoredat−80◦C.ItshouldbenotedthattheHis-tagdidnot affectthekineticparametersoftherecombinantenzyme[22]. 2.2. IntracellularlocalizationofPtP2-G6PDH
TheG6PDHcodingsequencewasamplifiedbyPCRwithprimers indicated in SupplementalTable 1 and cloned in the NcoI and BamHIsitesofpCK-GFP3vector,upstreamandinframewiththe GFPcodingsequence.YoungleavesofNicotianabenthamianawere transfectedbybombardmentwithaBiolisticPDS-1000/HeTM Sys-tem(BioRad).After18h,thefluorescencesofGFPandchlorophyll wereobservedat505–540nmandbeyond650nm,respectively, afterexcitationat488nmonaZeissLSM700confocalmicroscope. 2.3. Electrophoresisandwesternblottinganalysis
SDS-PAGEwasperformedusinga10%polyacrylamide resolv-inggelwitha4%stackinggel(Bio-RadMini-Protean).Forwestern blotting,separatedpolypeptidesweretransferredfromgelstoa Hybondmembrane(GeHealthcare).Themembranewasthen incu-batedwithprimarypotato antibodiesforP1-G6PDH (1:15.000),
Fig.1.A–AminoacidsequencealignmentofdifferentplantG6PDHsequences.Mainmotifsareindicatedintheupperlineinboldblack.Highlyconservedresiduesare highlightedinlightgrey;theRossman-fold,theactivesite,andtheNADP+bindingsiteareinboldwhiteletters,highlightedinblack;cysteineresiduesareinboldwhiteon
greyhighlighting.B–Phylogenetictreeofcytosolic,chloroplasticandplastidialG6PDHplantisoforms.C–TransientexpressionofaPtP2-G6PDH-GFPconstructintobacco leaves[29]:brightfieldimage,chlorophyllautofluorescence,GFP-fluorescence,andmergedimagesareshown.
Cornish-Bodenplots(Cornish-Bowden,1974).Thedetailsofthedeterminationofkineticparameters(apparentKMforG6PandNADP andtheKIforNADPH)areprovided
inthetext.Valuesareaverageof3separatedeterminations±standarderror(se).
SpecificActivity(U/mg) KM,G6P(mM) KM,NADP+(M) KiNADPH(M) InhibitionbyNADPH
WT 8000 1.06±0.06 15±3 74.1±2.5 competitive C145S 5700 1.05±0.26 71±18 73.4±2* 23.0±3.6** competitive* uncompetitive** C194S 4500 1.15±0.37 53±18 --- noinhibition C242S 6000 0.70±0.12 55±9 --- noinhibition C175S 1400 2.42±0.78 30±9 15.5±2.8 uncompetitive C183S 1500 2.31±1.00 77±7 23.9±3 uncompetitive C175S-C183S 1360 2.38±0.87 103±19 27.9±3.6 uncompetitive
P2-G6PDH(1:10.000)andCy-G6PDH(1:50.000)isoforms[8],and
Anti-His6(Roche)(1:6000).Potatoantiserawerepreviouslyproven toreactwithanddiscriminatethedifferentbarleyG6PDHisoforms [3,19].Afterincubatingthemembranewithsecondaryantibodies (anti-rabbit,1:16.000),cross-reactingpolypeptideswerestained foralkalinephosphataseactivityorbyenhanced chemilumines-cence[22,23].
2.4. G6PDHactivityassayanddeterminationofthekinetic parameters
G6PDHactivitywasassayedbymonitoringNADP+reductionat 340nm.Theassaymixturecontained50mMTris-HClpH8.0,5mM MgCl2,150MNADP+and3mMG6P.Enzymeactivity measure-mentswereperformedinduplicateagainstablankwithoutG6P. TheactivitywasexpressedasnmolesofNADP+reducedmin−1or pers−1,andexpressedasml−1ormg−1protein.
Kineticparameters(KmG6PandKmNADP+)weredeterminedby varyingtheconcentrationsofG6Pfrom0to30mM,andNADP+ con-centrationfrom0to150M.Kineticparameterswerecalculatedby non-linearregressionusingtheMichaelis-Mentenequationwith GraphPadPrism4.0software.
TheinhibitionpatternandconstantsforNADPH(KiNADPH)were determinedbyDixonplot[24]andCornish-Bowdenplot[25]after assayingproteinactivityatsubsaturatingconcentrationsofNADP+ (15,30, 50M)in the presence of NADPHranging from15 to 150M[23].
2.5. RedoxtreatmentsofPtP2-G6PDH
Recombinantenzymes(bothWTandcysteine variants)were purified under non-reducingconditions allowingthe formation ofregulatorydisulfidebond(s).Toconfirmthatrecombinant pro-teinswerefullyoxidizedafterpurification,wetestedtheeffectof oxidizeddithiothreitol(DTT)onG6PDHactivity.Asexpected,no variationofmaximalproteinactivitywasobservedindicatingthat nofurtheroxidationwasrequiredtoreachitsmaximalactivation state(datanotshown).InordertoevaluateG6PDHsensitivityto reducingtreatments,PtP2-G6PDHWTandcysteinemutants(2M) wereincubatedinthepresenceofvaryingDTTconcentrations rang-ingfrom5to100mM.PtP2-G6PDHWTinactivationwasalsotested inthepresenceofpurifiedchloroplasticf-(spinach),m-(spinach) andz(Populustrichocarpa) −typeTRXs (1,5, or10M) supple-mentedwith5mM reducedDTTtoallowfull reduction ofTRX [26].Attheindicatedtimes,analiquotwaswithdrawntoassay forenzymeactivity.Forotherredoxtreatments,PtP2-G6PDHwas incubatedwithvaryingconcentrationsofGSHorGSSG(0.5,1or 5mM).Attheindicatedtimes,analiquotwaswithdrawntoassay enzymeactivity.Allredoxtreatmentswerecarriedoutat25◦Cin 50mMTris-HCl,1mMEDTA,pH7.9.
2.6. Midpointredoxpotential
Redoxtitration experimentswerecarriedouttomonitorthe redoxstateoftheregulatorydisulfideofPtP2-G6PDHWTinthe presenceof mixturesof oxidizedandreduced DTTtopoisethe ambientredoxpotential.RecombinantPtP2-G6PDH(1M)inits initialredoxstatewasincubatedfor2hat25◦Cin100mM Tris-HCl,pH7.9,1mMEDTA,20mMreduced/oxidizedDTTinvarious dithiol/disulfideratios and TRX m(spinach) (0.2M) [26]. Fol-lowingincubation,NADP-dependentG6PDHactivitywasassayed as described above. Results were fitted by non-linear regres-sion(CoStat,CoHortSoftware)totheNernstequation(n=2,one dithiol/disulfide[26]).Midpointredoxpotentialsarereportedas means±standarddeviationsoftwoindependentexperiments. 2.7. Replicates
Alloftheresultsreportedarerepresentativeofatleastthree independentexperimentsandexpressedasmeans±S.D.,unless otherwisestated.
3. Resultsanddiscussion
3.1. Proteinsequenceanalysisandsubcellularlocalizationof PtP2-G6PDH
AputativeplastidicG6PDH(PtP2-G6PDH)sequencehasbeen identifiedinthePopulustrichocarpagenome(Potri.001G059900, http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/). The analysis of the protein sequence reveals the presence of typical motifs belonging to dehydrogenasesfamily:aRossman-foldmotif(G57ASGDLAKK65) andaNADP+-bindingsite(N416ELVIRV422)(Fig.1A).Inaddition, theactivesite region(F220RIDHYLGKE229)presentsa phenylala-nineresidue,typicaloftheplastidicisoforms,whichisgenerally replacedbyatyrosineinthecytosolicisoforms[6,13,22,27,28].
AcomparisonofPtP2-G6PDHwithotherplastidic, chloroplas-ticand cytosolic G6PDHsfromplantsclearly indicatesthat this sequencebelongstoplastidicP2-G6PDH isoforms(Fig.1B). Pre-dictionsperformedbytheTargetPbioinformaticsoftware(http:// www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/)indicatedthatthePtP2-G6PDH sequence likelypossesses a 66amino acid-longtransitpeptide. Inordertoverifythesubcellularlocalization,aPtP2-G6PDH-GFP fusionproteinwasgeneratedandusedfortransientexpressionin tobaccocells[29].Theresultsindicatedthatthetransitpeptideof PtP2-G6PDHdirectedtheconstructintoplastidsasexpectedfrom thepredictions(Fig.1C).
Inthematureenzyme,therearefiveCysresidues(Cys145,Cys175, Cys183,Cys194andCys242;Fig.1A),twoofthem,Cys175andCys183, areinapositionsimilartothetworegulatorycysteinesinvolvedin theformationofthedisulfidebondinP1G6PDH,assuggestedfor thepotato(Cys156-Cys161,[27,13]),barley(Cys159-Cys167,[22]),and Arabidopsisthaliana enzymes(Cys169-Cys177,[30])(Fig.1A).The
Fig.2.A–SDSPAGEofsamplesatdifferentpurificationstepsofPtP2-G6PDH;B– WesternblottingofthepurifiedPtP2-G6PDHusingantiP2-G6PDH,antiCy-G6PDH antibodies;andC–anti-Hisantibodies.
Legend:M,Markers;Control,bacteriatransformedwithan“empty”plasmid;pellet ofbacterialysate;S,surpernatantofbacteriallysate;purifiedproteinfromsoluble fraction.Thearrowindicatesthesubunitmolecularweight(61kDa)ofthe over-expressedPtP2-G6PDH,calculatedwiththerelativemobilityfactormethod.
conservationofregulatorycysteineswasindeedsuggestivethat P2-G6PDHisoformscouldalsoberegulatedthroughdithiol/disulfide exchangereactionsasdescribedforchloroplasticP1-G6PDH[9]. 3.2. PurificationofrecombinantPtP2-G6PDH
TherecombinantPtP2-G6PDHwasproducedasamature pro-teinfusedwithaHis6-tag,exhibitingaMWof61kDa(Fig.2A).The constructionwasdesignedinsuchawaythattheputative tran-sitpeptidewaseliminatedandanN-terminalHis-tagwasfused totheprotein(seeMethods).Therecombinantenzymewas sol-ubleandcouldbepurifiedtohomogeneityusinganimmobilized nickelmetalaffinitychromatography(IMAC),withafinalyieldof 0.8–3mgperlitreofculture.
Thepurifiedproteinreactedpositivelywithpotatoplastidic P2-G6PDH[8];(Fig.2B)andantiHis-tagantibodies(Fig.2C),whileno reactionwasobservedusingapotatocy-G6PDHantiserum(Fig.2B). Moreover,ithadtheexpectedsizeforafusionproteinwithaHis-tag anddeprivedofthetransitsequence.
3.3. RedoxpropertiesofrecombinantWTPtP2-G6PDHandofCys toSermutants
PlastidicG6PDHsarestronglyinhibitedbyincreasinglevelsof artificialreductants, suchasDTT; incontrast,whentheprotein isfullyoxidized,theenzymeexhibitsitsmaximalcatalyticrate [8,27,31].
In order to test the redox sensitivity of recombinant PtP2-G6PDH, the purified enzyme was incubated with different concentrationsofDTT.Theactivitywasreducedinadose-and time-dependentmanner,retaining 50%ofitsinitialrateafter60min incubationinthepresenceof25mMDTT,orafter20minwhen exposedto100mMDTT(Fig.3A).On theotherhand,insimilar experimentalconditionsP2G6PDHactivitywasnotaffectedby themonothiolglutathioneeitherinthereduced(GSH)oroxidized (GSSG)form,upto5mM(SupplementalFig.1AandB).
Basedonthesensitivity toreduced DTT,themidpointredox potentialofthepurifiedrecombinantPtP2-G6PDHwasdetermined afterproteinincubationinthepresenceofdifferentDTTred/DTTox ratiospoisingvariableredoxpotentials.AsshowninFig.3B,G6PDH
activityisfullydependentontheredoxpotentialanddata interpo-lationwiththeNernstequation,includingasingledithiol/disulfide redoxpair(n=2),givesastandardredoxpotentialof−332.7mV (pH7.9).Thisvalueislessnegativethantheoneofbothf-and m-typeTRXs(−351and−358mV,respectively[32]),thussuggesting thatPtP2-G6PDHcouldbefavourablyreduced,butlessfavourably oxidizedbytheseTRXtypes.Asacomparison,Arabidopsisthaliana P1-G6PDH,whichisregulatedbyTRXfexhibitsanEmof329.9mV
[9].
Toinvestigatetheregulatoryfunctionsplayedbythedifferent cysteines,eachresiduewassubstitutedintoserinebysite-directed mutagenesis. These recombinant proteins were overexpressed andpurifiedfollowingthesameproceduredescribedfortheWT enzyme,andsimilaryieldswereobtained(0.5–2mg perlitreof culture−notshown).Specificactivitiesandotherkinetic proper-tiesofthepurifiedmutatedenzymesincomparisonwiththewild typePtP2-G6PDHareindicatedinTable1.
Theredoxpropertiesofthesecysteinevariantswerethen exam-inedand,basedontheirsensitivitytoDTT-dependentinhibition, theycouldbedividedintotwodistinctgroups.Thefirstcluster comprises C145S,C194Sand C242Smutants, exhibiting a DTT-sensitivitysimilartotheWTPtP2-G6PDH(Fig.3C),suggestingthat these residues are not involved in the redox regulationof the enzyme.
ThesecondgroupincludestheC175S,C183Svariantsandthe doublemutantC175S-C183S,whicharecompletelyinsensitiveto DTT(Fig.3C),indicatingthatthesetworesiduesareindeedthose responsiblefortheredoxsensitivityoftheenzyme,andtherefore verylikely involvedintheformationof theregulatorydisulfide bond.
3.4. Localizationofcysteinesinthe3DmodelofPtP2-G6PDH BasedonPtP2-G6PDHaminoacidsequence,aputative3Dmodel wasgeneratedusingthestructureofhumancytosolicG6PDHasa template(Fig.3D).Incidentally,humancytosolicG6PDHexhibitsits highestcatalyticrateasatetramer,formedbyactivehomodimers linkedtogetherbysalinebonds[33].
Duetothewell-knownregulatoryroleofthedisulfidein plas-tidic G6PDHs, includingPtP2-G6PDH[8,13,22,27],we speculate thatthereisaconformationalchangeinducedbyformationofthe Cys175-Cys183bond.TheregulatoryCys175andCys183are surface-exposed,and locatedinanunstructuredloopintheN-terminal region of the protein (Fig. 3D). Intriguingly, human cytosolic G6PDH,whichisnotredox-regulated(thisisalsotrueforhigher plantcy-G6PDH,[28]),isabletoformastructuraldisulfidebond (Cys13-Cys446)inthesameregionofthe3D-structure[33].Ithas beenproposedthatthisdisulfidemaypreventtheunstructured N-terminalregiontointerferewiththecatalyticactivityoftheenzyme [34].Similarly,thedisulfideCys175-Cys183presentinthefullyactive plastidicenzymewouldallowaneasieraccessofthesubstratesto theactivesite,bystabilisingtheflexibleloopattheN-terminus.
It shouldbenoted that inthis model thepositionof Cys145 isquiteclosetotheregulatorydisulfidewhereas theothertwo residues(Cys194andCys242)wouldbelocatedindifferentpartsof thestructure,fartherfromtheactivesite.
3.5. PtP2-G6PDHispreferentiallyregulatedbym-typeTRX
Higherplantplastidscontainatleast5conventionalTRXtypes, namelyf,m,x,yandz[35,36],aswellasseveralotherTRXswith atypicalactivesitesequences[29,37].
Generally, the m- and f-type TRXs are implicated in the regulation of enzymes involved in photosynthesis and carbon metabolism,whiletheotherTRXsareassociatedtotheanti-oxidant response [35,38–40]and TRX zplaysa role linkedtoorganelle
Fig.3. A–EffectsofDTTredonPtP2-G6PDHactivity.Thepurifiedenzymewasincubatedfor20min(blackbars)or60min(greybars)atdifferentconcentrationsofDTTred,
andG6PDHactivitydetermined.B–DeterminationofthemidpointredoxpotentialofthepurifiedrecombinantPtP2-G6PDH.C–EffectsofDTTredonPtP2-G6PDHcysteine
mutants.Purifiedenzymeswereincubatedfor60minintheabsence(greybars)orinthepresence(blackbars)of25mMDTTred,andG6PDHactivitydetermined.D–3D
modelofPtP2-G6PDHmonomerstructure.Theasterisksonbarsindicateap<0,05withrespecttocontrols.
ModellingwasmadeusingSwissProtsoftwarebasedontheknownstructureofahumanG6PDHisoformandvisualizedusingPyMOL[33].TheSwiss-protPDBviewer program(availableat:http://expasy.org/spdbv/)allowedthecolorationofcysteineresiduesaccordingtotheiraccessibilityfromred(lessaccessible)toyellow(more accessible).Shapedportionsoftheproteinappearincyan(␣-helices)andmagenta(-sheets)whileunstructuredregionsareinlightpink.
development[36].Itshouldbenotedthatthefirstattemptswhich proposedaspecificroleforTRXmintheregulationofplastidic G6PDHweremadewithcrudeextractofbacteriaoverexpressinga recombinantpotatoplastidicisoform[27].
Havingobtainedapurifiedandstablerecombinantenzyme,we wereabletotesttheeffectofdifferentplastidicTRXs(m-,f-and z-types)onPtP2-G6PDH(Fig.4).ThemostefficientwasTRXm, inhibitingG6PDHactivityby50%after1minat1M(Fig.4A).At thesameconcentration,TRXfwaslesseffective,(45%inhibition after20min),and TRXzwasessentiallyinefficient(Fig.4A).By increasingTRXconcentrations(Fig.4BandC),theregulatoryeffects becamemoreevident.At10MTRXconcentration,90%inhibition wasreachedafter1minbyTRXmandafter3minbyTRXf;while TRXzonlypromoteda60%inhibitionafter5min.Ourexperiments indicatethattheeffectivenessofthedifferentTRXsonPtP2-G6PDH canbearrangedasTRXm>TRXf>TRXz.
Theseresultssuggestthatdifferentpatternsofredox regula-tionexistforcompartmentedG6PDHsinhigherplants.Specifically, TRXfisthemostefficientintheregulationofchloroplasticG6PDH from both A. thaliana (P1-type AtG6PDH); [9,11] and the psy-chrophilicalgaKoliellaantarctica[41].Itshouldbeunderlinedthat f-typeTRXs are wellknowntoregulatetheactivitiesof redox-sensitiveCalvin-Bensoncycleenzymes,namelyglyceraldehyde-3P dehydrogenase (GAPDH) [42], phosphoribulokinase (PRK) [42], fructose-1,6-bisphosphatephosphatase[43]andsedoheptulose1-7 bisphosphatase[44].
Ontheotherhand,wedemonstrateherethattheactivityof plas-tidicP2-G6PDHismainlyredox-modulatedbyTRXm-type.TRX misgenerallyindicatedasaregulatorofNADP-malate dehydro-genase(EC1.1.1.82),thusplayingacentralroleintheregulation ofredoxpoisebalancingbetweenthechloroplastandthecytosol; recently,progresshasbeendone,describingatleast3–4distinct TRXminchloroplasts,andsuggestingspecificrolesindifferent metabolicprocesses[12].Thus,itcouldbesuggestedaregulation ofP2-G6PDHisoformsbasedonreductionstateoftheplastid(e.g. malatedehydrogenaseactive;TRXmreduced−P2-G6PDH inac-tivated),sensiblydifferentfromthatofP1-G6PDH(Calvin-Benson cycleactive,TRXfreduced,P1-G6PDHinactivated)[11].
ThismodelwouldimplythatP1-G6PDHmustbemostly inac-tiveinthelight,whileP2-G6PDHregulationisindependentoflight (asexpectedforanenzymeexpressedinheterotrophiccells),and appearsmore strictlyrelated totheprimary metabolismofthe organelle.
3.6. KineticpropertiesofrecombinantPtP2-G6PDHWTand cysteinemutants
To our knowledge, the activity of plastidic P2-type G6PDH isoforms hasbeen investigated in thepast only withbacterial lysates,orusingpartiallypurifiedpreparationsfromplantmaterial [3,8,16,20,21].Therefore,duetotheinstabilityofthisisoform,the biochemicalpropertiesofPtP2-G6PDHhavebeenproperly
inves-Fig.4.EffectsofTRXsonPtP2-G6PDH.Activityofpurifiedenzymeswasdetermined afterincubationfordifferenttimesinthepresenceof5mMDTTalone(control,open circles)orsupplementedwith:A–1M;B–5M;C–10MofTRXm(closed squares),TRXf(opensquares),TRXz(closedcircles).
tigatedonlyrecentlywithapurified recombinantenzymefrom barleyroots,buteventhough,thispreparationwasfarlessstable thanthepoplarenzymegeneratedhereandthusthekineticdata presentedherearethemostreliable[22].
Recombinant,his-tagged PtP2-G6PDHwaspurified fully oxi-dized,andshowedaspecificactivityof8000nmolmin−1 NADP+ reducedmg prot−1 (Table1).Thekinetic analysisrevealedthat PtP2-G6PDHdisplaysaKM,G6Pof1.06±0.06mMandKM,NADP+of 15.0±3.2M(Table1),similarlytovaluesobservedforotherplant P2-G6PDHs[22,30].
TheinhibitionconstantforNADPH(KI,NAPDH)wasfoundtobe 74M(Table1),avaluecomparabletobarley[3,22],andpotato P2-G6PDHs[8].ThecomparisonofDixonandCornish-Bowdenplots [45]revealedacompetitiveinhibitionbyNADPHofPtP2-G6PDH (Fig.5A).ItisnoteworthythatNAPDHexertsasimilarinhibitory
mechanismonrecombinantbarleyCy-G6PDH[28],althoughthe KI,NAPDHisconsiderablylowerforcytosolicisoforms(10–25M).
Moreover, it should be underlined that this combination of kinetic properties undoubtedly categorises the enzyme as a plastidicP2-G6PDH,andcandiscriminateitfromchloroplastic P1-G6PDHs[8,18,22]andCy-G6PDHs[28,46].
Notably,itshouldbeexpectedthatthelightinactivationof P1-G6PDH shouldbeaccompaniedby ahighsensitivity toNADPH inhibition(NADPH/NADP+ratioare>2inthelight)–[47];while P2-G6PDHshouldbemostlyinsensitivetoNADPH,becauseofitsmain roleinthesupplyofreducingequivalents(i.e.NADPH)forplastidic biosynthesessuchasnitritereduction[14],nitrogenassimilation [15,16,21],orlipidmetabolism[48].
ThusithasbeenproposedthatpartofP2-G6PDHactivitycould beretainedevenunderlightconditionsinchloroplaststosustain activenutrientassimilation[3],evenwhenphotosynthesiscouldbe partiallyinhibitedbystomataclosureandoxidativestress;anyway, itshouldbeunderlinedthatadefinitiveevidenceforthepresence ofP2-G6PDHinchloroplastsisstilllacking.
Mutant enzymes lacking non-regulatory cysteines (C145S; C194S;C242S)exhibitedspecificactivitiesandKm,G6P similarto WTPtP2-G6PDH;a3.5-4.5foldincreaseinKm,NADP+wasobserved (Table1).
Bycontrast,C175SandC183Smutantsshowedareduced spe-cific activity (<20% of WT), and a reduced affinity for sugar-P
(Km,G6P=2.3–2.4mM), as expected for an enzyme mimicking a
reduced,partiallyinactivated,WTprotein(Table1).
Correspondingly,theregulatorycysteine toserinemutations decreased their affinity for NADP+ (30M<K
m,NADP+<100M). Theseresultswouldsupportaroleforthedisulfideinthe stabil-isationoftheenzyme-substratebinding,assuggestedforhuman G6PDH[34].
Then,theNADPH-dependentinhibitionofPtP2-G6PDHactivity wasfurtherinvestigatedoncysteinemutants.
TheC145SmutantshowedamixedinhibitionbyNADPH;the competitiveinhibition(ic)constantwasidenticaltoWTenzyme, indicating that C145 is not directly involved in the regulation of activity;ontheotherhand, theCornish-Bowdenplotfitsan uncompetitiveinhibition (iu) KiuNADPH=23M, suggesting that C145mighthaveastructuralroleinthedockingofNADP+,itsaffinity being3.5-foldlowerthantheonemeasuredfortheWT(Fig.5B).
Itshouldbenotedthatthemodelofthe3Dstructureindicates thatC145islocatedclosetoNADP+bindingsite,andlikelytothe disulfideC175-C183(Fig.3D).
Both C194 and C242 are somehow structurallyimportant for NADP+/NADPHbinding.Interestingly,thesubstitutionofC194and C242toserinesprecludedNADPHinhibition(Fig.5B),andcaused a 3-foldincreaseof KM,NADP+ (Table1), althoughthese residues seemtobeburiedinthe3D-modeloftheenzyme(Fig.3D).This suggeststhattheseresiduesarepossiblyinvolvedintheoptimal foldingoftheNADP+bindingsite,improvingsubstrateaffinityand modulatingthebindingoftheinhibitoryNADPH.
A different scheme applies to the mutants lacking regula-torycysteines(C175S,C183S,anddoublemutantC175S-C183S), allexhibitinganuncompetitiveinhibitionbyNADPH(Fig.5D–F; KiuNADPH of15–24M),andastrongdecreaseintheaffinityfor G6P(Table1).Theseresultssuggestthatthereductionofthe disul-fideinducesachangeinconformation,resultingintheabilityof theenzymetobindNADPHaftertheformationofthe enzyme-substrate complex, with an increased affinity for the inhibitor NADPHandaloweraffinityforthesubstrates(Table1).
Fig.5.DeterminationofthetypeofinhibitionandinhibitionconstantvaluesofwildtypeandmutatedPtP2-G6PDHs.Thedescriptionoftheinhibition,andKI,NAPDHare
indicated.
A–WildtypePtP2-G6PDH(WT);Dixonplot(left)andCornish-Bowdenplot(right).B–DixonPlotforC194S(up)andC242S(below).C–C145SDixonplot(left)and Cornish-Bowdenplot(right).D–C175SDixonplot(up)andCornish-Bowdenplot(below).E–C183SDixonplot(up)andCornish-Bowdenplot(below).F–C175S-C183S Dixonplot(up)andCornish-Bowdenplot(below).
4. Conclusion
Byusingacombinationofkineticanalysis,site-directed muta-genesistogetherwith 3D-structuremodelling,we wereableto proposeamodeloftheredoxmodulationofapoplarP2-G6PDH activity.
ThekineticparametersobservedforPtP2-G6PDHsuggestthat thisisoformcouldnotbeinhibitedbyNADPHlevelsunder physio-logicalconditions,especiallyinthedark;but,possiblyevenunder
lightconditions–whenphotosynthesisisactive,andproducing moietiesofreductants–theenzymewouldretainitsactivity(and function) in order to sustain nutrients’ assimilation and stress response[3,4].
Inhigherplantsandalgae,theredoxregulationof chloroplas-tic P1-G6PDHisoformshasbeen recentlylinkedtof-type TRXs [9,11,41].Nevertheless, previousreports generallyindicated m-typeTRXscouldbephysiologicallyinvolvedinthemodulationof plantcompartmentedG6PDH[27].
TheresultsherepresentedsuggestthatPtP2-isoformwouldbe (andactivated)bym-typeTRXs, generallyintendedasthemain regulatorsofthechloroplastcatabolism,andnotbyf-typeTRXs whicharemorestrictlyrelatedtophotosynthesis[9].
Amongthefivecysteinespresentintheactiveproteinsequence, C194andC242playaroleinthestabilizationandpropertiesofNADP+ site,whileC145,althoughveryclosetotheregulatoryC175-C183 disulfide,seemstointerferewiththebindingofNADP+duringthe formationoftheenzyme-substratecomplex.
Here,ourresultsshowedthatthedisulfideC175-C183presentin plastidicP2-G6PDHisbetterreducedbym-typeTRXandtoalesser extentbyf-typeTRX;inaddition,z-typeTRXdoesnotseemtoplay asignificantroleforitsreduction.
Thus,theP1andP2isoformsmaybetargetsofdifferentTRXs. Ontheonehand,TRXfpreferentiallycontrolschloroplasticG6PDH activity (i.e. P1-G6PDH), as occurring for the redox-modulated enzymesinvolvedintheCalvin-Bensoncycle[49].
Ontheotherhand,theactivityofnon-photosyntheticG6PDH (P2-G6PDH) is better controlledby m-type TRX, which is well knowntoregulateNADP+-malatedehydrogenase,althoughthef −typeTRXwasfoundtobeabetterreductantafterall[50,51].
Finally,TRX-mdisulfide-dependentredoxregulationof PtP2-G6PDH would control the supply of reductants during active nutrient assimilation(e.g.nitrogen,sulfur) [21] or understress conditions(drought,salinity)[4,6,19].
Therefore,thereisanurgentneedtoget3Dstructuresofreduced and oxidized enzymesto understandtheinvolvement of these regulatorycysteinesinthestructuralchangesrequiredforthe for-mationofastableandactiveG6PDH.
Acknowledgments
ResearchsupportedbyLeggeRegionaledellaCampania5/2002 (2007),CUPE69D15000270002.
ManuelaCardiacknowledgesEGIDEfundingfromFrench Min-istryofForeignAffairs(grant672700K;years2009and2010/11); and Project FORGIARE (Formazione Giovani alla Ricerca) V-10/FORG/ST/2012/5(2012–2015)byCompagniadiSanPaolo.
UMR1136 is supported by a grant overseen by the French NationalResearch Agency(ANR)aspartofthe“Investissements d’Avenir” program (ANR-11-LABX-0002-01, Lab of Excellence ARBRE).
TheAuthorsthankverymuchAntjevonSchaewen(Muenster– Germany)forthegenerousgiftofG6PDHantibodies.
Noconflictsofinterestdeclared. AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,in theonlineversion,athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.08. 003.
References
[1]N.J.Kruger,A.vonSchaewen,Theoxidativepentosephosphatepathway: structureandorganisation,Curr.Opin.PlantBiol.6(3)(2003)236–246. [2]X.Long,B.He,Y.Fang,C.Tang,Identificationandcharacterizationofthe
glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasegenefamilyinthepararubbertree, Heveabrasiliensis,Front.PlantSci.7(February)(2016)1–14.
[3]S.Esposito,G.Guerriero,V.Vona,V.DiMartinoRigano,S.Carfagna,C.Rigano, Glutamatesynthaseactivitiesandproteinchangesinrelationtonitrogen nutritioninbarley:thedependenceondifferentplastidicglucose-6P dehydrogenaseisoforms,J.Exp.Bot.56(409)(2005)55–64.
[4]S.Esposito,Nitrogenassimilation,abioticstressandglucose6-phosphate dehydrogenase:thefullcircleofreductants,Plants5(2)(2016),p.24. [5]S.DalSanto,H.Stampfl,J.Krasensky,S.Kempa,Y.Gibon,E.Petutschnig,W.
Rozhon,A.Heuck,T.Clausen,C.Jonak,Stress-inducedGSK3regulatesthe redoxstressresponsebyphosphorylatingglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenaseinarabidopsis,PlantCell24(August)(2012)3380–3392.
[6]S.Landi,R.Nurcato,A.DeLillo,M.Lentini,S.Grillo,S.Esposito,
Glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenaseplaysacentralroleintheresponseof tomato(Solanumlycopersicum)plantstoshortandlong-termdrought,Plant Physiol.Biochem.105(2016)79–89.
[7]Y.Yang,Z.Fu,Y.Su,X.Zhang,G.Li,J.Guo,Y.Que,L.Xu,Acytosolic glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasegene,ScG6PDH,playsapositiverolein responsetovariousabioticstressesinsugarcane,Sci.Rep.(4)(2014)7090, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep07090.
[8]U.K.Wendt,I.Wenderoth,a.Tegeler,a.VonSchaewen,Molecular
characterizationofanovelglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasefrompotato (SolanumtuberosumL.),PlantJ.23(6)(2000)723–733.
[9]G.Née,M.Zaffagnini,P.Trost,E.Issakidis-Bourguet,Redoxregulationof chloroplasticglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenase:anewroleforf-type thioredoxin,FEBSLett.583(17)(2009)2827–2832.
[10]M.Ferrara,G.Guerriero,M.Cardi,S.Esposito,Purificationandbiochemical characterisationofaglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasefromthe psychrophilicgreenalgaKoliellaantarctica,Cell(2013)53–62.
[11]G.Nee,M.Aumont-Nicaise,M.Zaffagnini,S.Nessler,M.Valerio-Lepiniec,E. Issakidis-Bourguet,RedoxregulationofchloroplasticG6PDHactivitybyTRX occursthroughstructuralchangesmodifyingsubstrateaccessibilityand co-factorbinding,Biochem.J125(2013)117–125.
[12]L.Michelet,M.Zaffagnini,S.Morisse,F.Sparla,M.E.Pérez-Pérez,F.Francia,A. Danon,C.H.Marchand,S.Fermani,P.Trost,S.D.Lemaire,Redoxregulationof theCalvin-Bensoncycle:somethingold,somethingnew,Front.PlantSci.4 (November)(2013),p.470.
[13]U.K.Wendt,R.Hauschild,C.Lange,M.Pietersma,I.Wenderoth,a.von Schaewen,EvidenceforfunctionalconvergenceofredoxregulationinG6PDH isoformsofcyanobacteriaandhigherplants,PlantMol.Biol.40(3)(1999) 487–494.
[14]C.G.Bowsher,D.P.Hucklesby,M.J.Emes,Nitritereductionandcarbohydrate metabolisminplastidspurifiedfromrootsofPisumsativumL,Planta177(3) (1989)359–366.
[15]C.Bowsher,E.Boulton,J.Rose,Reductantforglutamatesynthaseingenerated bytheoxidativepentosephosphatepathwayinnon-photosyntheticroot plastids,PlantJ.2(6)(1992)893–898.
[16]S.Esposito,G.Massaro,V.Vona,V.DiMartinoRigano,S.Carfagna,Glutamate synthesisinbarleyroots:theroleoftheplastidicglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase,Planta216(4)(2003)639–647.
[17]Y.Nemoto,T.Sasakuma,Specificexpressionofglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase(G6PDH)genebysaltstressinwheat(TriticumaestivumL.), PlantSci.2(1–2)(2000)53–60.
[18]Z.Tjaden,E.Weis,A.VonSchaewen,J.Scharte,H.Scho,Isoenzyme replacementofglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenaseinthecytosolimproves stresstoleranceinplants,PNAS106(19)(2009)8061–8066.
[19]M.Cardi,D.Castiglia,M.Ferrara,G.Guerriero,M.Chiurazzi,S.Esposito,The effectsofsaltstresscauseadiversionofbasalmetabolisminbarleyroots: possibledifferentrolesforglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenaseisoforms, PlantPhysiol.Biochem.86(2015)44–54.
[20]S.Esposito,S.Carfagna,G.Massaro,V.Vona,V.DiMartinoRigano, Glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenaseinbarleyroots:kineticpropertiesand localisationoftheisoforms,Planta212(4)(2001)627–634.
[21]S.Esposito,G.Massaro,V.Vona,V.DiMartinoRigano,S.Carfagna,C.Rigano, Ammoniuminductionofanovelisoformofglucose-6Pdehydrogenasein barleyroots,Physiol.Plant.113(4)(2001)469–476.
[22]M.Cardi,K.Chibani,D.Castiglia,D.Cafasso,E.Pizzo,N.Rouhier,J.-P.Jacquot, S.Esposito,Overexpression,purificationandenzymaticcharacterizationofa recombinantplastidialglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasefrombarley (HordeumvulgarecvNure)roots,PlantPhysiol.Biochem.73(2013)266–273. [23]D.Castiglia,M.Cardi,S.Landi,D.Cafasso,S.Esposito,Expressionand
characterizationofacytosolicglucose6phosphatedehydrogenaseisoform frombarley(Hordeumvulgare)roots,ProteinExpr.Purif.112(2015)8–14. [24]M.Dixon,ThegraphicaldeterminationofKmandKi,Biochem.J.129(1972)
197–202.
[25]A.Cornish-Bowden,Asimplegraphicalmethodfordeterminingtheinhibition constantsofmixed,uncompetitiveandnon-competitiveinhibitors,Biochem. J137(1)(1974)143–144.
[26]M.Zaffagnini,L.Michelet,V.Massot,P.Trost,S.D.Lemaire,Biochemical characterizationofglutaredoxinsfromChlamydomonasreinhardtiireveals theuniquepropertiesofachloroplasticCGFS-typeglutaredoxin,J.Biol.Chem. 283(14)(2008)8868–8876.
[27]I.Wenderoth,R.Scheibe,a.vonSchaewen,Identificationofthecysteine residuesinvolvedinredoxmodificationofplantplastidic
glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenase,J.Biol.Chem.272(43)(1997) 26985–26990.
[28]D.Castiglia,M.Cardi,S.Landi,D.Cafasso,S.Esposito,Expressionand characterizationofacytosolicglucose6phosphatedehydrogenaseisoform frombarley(Hordeumvulgare)roots,ProteinExpr.Purif.112(2015)8–14. [29]K.Chibani,L.Tarrago,J.M.Gualberto,G.Wingsle,P.Rey,J.-P.Jacquot,N.
Rouhier,Atypicalthioredoxinsinpoplar:theglutathione-dependent thioredoxin-like2.1supportstheactivityoftargetenzymespossessinga singleredoxactivecysteine,PlantPhysiol.159(June)(2012)592–605. [30]S.Wakao,C.Benning,Genome-wideanalysisofglucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenasesinArabidopsis,PlantJ.41(2)(2005)243–256. [31]a.vonSchaewen,G.Langenkämper,K.Graeve,I.Wenderoth,R.Scheibe,
[32]V.Collin,E.Issakidis-Bourguet,C.Marchand,M.Hirasawa,J.M.Lancelin,D.B. Knaff,M.Miginiac-Maslow,TheArabidopsisplastidialthioredoxins.New functionsandnewinsightsintospecificity,J.Biol.Chem.278(26)(2003) 23747–23752.
[33]S.W.Au,C.E.Naylor,S.Gover,L.Vandeputte-Rutten,D.A.Scopes,P.J.Mason,L. Luzzatto,V.M.Lam,M.J.Adams,Solutionofthestructureoftetramerichuman glucose6-phosphatedehydrogenasebymolecularreplacement,Acta Crystallogr.D.Biol.Crystallogr.55(Pt4)(1999)826–834.
[34]S.W.Au,S.Gover,V.M.Lam,M.J.Adams,Humanglucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase:thecrystalstructurerevealsastructuralNADP(+)molecule andprovidesinsightsintoenzymedeficiency,Structure8(3)(2000)293–303. [35]S.D.Lemaire,L.Michelet,M.Zaffagnini,V.Massot,E.Issakidis-Bourguet,
Thioredoxinsinchloroplasts,Curr.Genet.51(6)(2007)343–365. [36]K.Petersen,W.Lein,F.Bo,Plastidialthioredoxinzinteractswithtwo
fructokinase-likeproteinsinathiol-dependentmanner:evidenceforan essentialroleinchloroplastdevelopmentinArabidopsisandNicotiana benthamiana,Society22(May)(2010)1498–1515.
[37]K.Chibani,G.Wingsle,J.P.Jacquot,E.Gelhaye,N.Rouhier,Comparative fenomicstudyofthethioredoxinfamilyinphotosyntheticorganismswith emphasisonpopulustrichocarpa,Mol.Plant2(2)(2009)308–322. [38]K.Chibani,L.Tarrago,P.Schürmann,J.Jacquot,N.Rouhier,Biochemical
propertiesofpoplarthioredoxinz,FEBSLett.585(7)(2011)1077–1081. [39]L.Nikkanen,E.Rintama,Thioredoxin-dependentregulatorynetworksin
chloroplastsunderfluctuatinglightconditions,Society(2014)1–7. [40]M.Balsera,E.Uberegui,P.Schurmann,B.Buchanan,NotitleNotitle,Antioxid.
RedoxSignal.21(9)(2014)1327–1355.
[41]M.Ferrara,G.Guerriero,M.Cardi,S.Esposito,Purificationandbiochemical characterisationofaglucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasefromthe psychrophilicgreenalgaKoliellaantarctica,pp.53–62(2013).
thioredoxinsofcalvincycleenzymesofArabidopsisthalianaassociatedinthe GAPDH/CP12/PRKsupramolecularcomplex,Mol.Plant2(2)(2009)259–269. [43]J.P.Jacquot,J.Lopez-Jaramillo,M.Miginiac-Maslow,S.Lemaire,J.Cherfils,A.
Chueca,J.Lopez-Gorge,Cysteine-153isrequiredforredoxregulationofpea chloroplastfructose-1,6-bisphosphatase,FEBSLett.401(2–3)(1997) 143–147.
[44]D.D.Gütle,T.Roret,S.J.Müller,J.Couturier,S.D.Lemaire,A.Hecker,T. Dhalleine,B.B.Buchanan,R.Reski,O.Einsle,J.-P.Jacquot,ChloroplastFBPase andSBPasearethioredoxin-linkedenzymeswithsimilararchitecturebut differentevolutionaryhistories,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.(May)(2016). [45]Cornish,Bowden,Fundamentalsofenzymekineticsbyathelcornish-Bowden,
Fundam.Enzym.Kinet.(2004)113–130,3rdEd.,vol.Chapter5. [46]S.Wakao,C.Andre,C.Benning,Functionalanalysesofcytosolic
glucose-6-phosphatedehydrogenasesandtheircontributiontoseedoil accumulationinArabidopsis,PlantPhysiol.146(1)(2008)277–288. [47]G.Forti,A.Furia,P.Bombelli,G.Finazzi,C.Nazionale,S.Milano,D.Biologia,V.
Celoria,InVivoChangesoftheOxidation-ReductionStateofNADPandofthe ATP/ADPCellularRatioLinkedtothePhotosyntheticActivityin
Chlamydomonasreinhardtii1,vol.132,no.July,pp.1464–1474,2003. [48]D.Hutchings,S.Rawsthorne,M.J.Emes,Fattyacidsynthesisandtheoxidative
pentosephosphatepathwayindevelopingembryosofoilseedrape(Brassica napusL.),56,412,577–585,2005.
[49]L.Michelet,M.Zaffagnini,S.Morisse,F.Sparla,M.E.Pérez-pérez,F.Francia,A. Danon,C.H.Marchand,S.Fermani,P.Trost,S.D.Lemaire,Redoxregulationof theCalvin−Bensoncycle:somethingold,somethingnew,PlantPhysiol.4 (November)(2013)1–21.
[50]J.P.Jacquot,J.Vidal,P.Gadal,Identificationofaproteinfactorinvolvedin dithiothreitolactivationofNADPmalatedehydrogenasefromfrenchbean leaves,FEBSLett.71(2)(1976)223–227.
[51]J.P.Jacquot,J.Vidal,P.Gadal,P.Schürmann,Evidencefortheexistenceof severalenzyme-specificthioredoxinsinplants,FEBSLett.96(2)(1978) 243–246.