• Non ci sono risultati.

Syed et al 2012

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Syed et al 2012"

Copied!
8
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Alternative

splicing

in

plants

coming

of

age

Naeem

H.

Syed

1

,

Maria

Kalyna

2

,

Yamile

Marquez

2

,

Andrea

Barta

2

and

John

W.S.

Brown

1,3

1

DivisionofPlantSciences,UniversityofDundeeattheJamesHuttonInstitute,Invergowrie,DundeeDD25DA,Scotland,UK 2

MaxF.PerutzLaboratories,MedicalUniversityofVienna,DrBohr-Gasse9/3,A-1030Vienna,Austria 3CellandMolecularSciences,TheJamesHuttonInstitute,Invergowrie,DundeeDD25DA,Scotland,UK

More than60% of intron-containinggenesundergo al-ternative splicing (AS) in plants. This number will in-crease when AS in different tissues, developmental stages,and environmentalconditions areexplored. Al-thoughthefunctionalimpactofASonprotein complex-ity is still understudied in plants, recent examples demonstrateitsimportanceinregulatingplant process-es.ASalsoregulatestranscriptlevelsandthelinkwith nonsense-mediateddecayandgenerationof unproduc-tive mRNAsillustratetheneed forbothtranscriptional andASdataingeneexpression analyses.AShas influ-encedtheevolutionofthecomplexnetworksof regula-tionofgeneexpressionandvariationinAScontributed toadaptationofplantstotheirenvironmentand there-forewillimpactstrategiesforimprovingplantandcrop phenotypes.

Frequencyandconsequencesof alternativesplicing (AS)

AS(seeGlossary)producesmultiplemRNAsfromthesame

genethroughvariableselectionofsplicesitesduring pre-mRNAsplicing.Itplaysakeyregulatoryrolein modulat-inggeneexpressionduringdevelopmentandinresponseto environmentalsignals[1–4].RegulationofASindifferent cell types andunder different conditions dependson se-quence elements in pre-mRNAs and the interactions of RNA-binding proteins whichvary intheir concentration and activity. The phenotype of a cell is determined by transcriptional,post-transcriptional,and post-translation-al networks,whichincludeasakeycomponentthe regu-latedASofthousandsofgenes.Inhumans,where>95%of genesarealternativelyspliced,extensiveproteindiversity is largelya resultofAS [5].Nextgeneration sequencing hasrevolutionizedresearchintoASandglobalmappingof human splicing regulatory proteins totheir target RNA sequences has ledto the development ofa splicing code that will allowpredictionoftissue-dependentAS [6].AS not only contributes to proteome diversity but also can generatetruncatedproteinsthatarepotentiallyregulatory or detrimental to the cell. It also plays a role in gene expressionbyregulatingtranscriptlevelsthrough produc-tion of isoforms which are degraded by the nonsense-mediateddecay(NMD)pathway.

Inplants,computationalanalysesofASeventsbasedon expressedsequencetagsandmorerecently high-through-puttranscriptomesequencinghaveexaminedthe frequen-cyofoccurrenceofASindifferentspecies[42%and33%of intron-containinggenesinArabidopsis(Arabidopsis thali-ana)andrice(Oryzasativa),respectively]andofdifferent typesofASevents[7–10].InArabidopsis,thefrequencyof occurrence hasrisensignificantly overthe past10years

(Figure1). Recently, an extensive RNA-seqanalysis has

significantly increased the observed frequency of AS in Arabidopsistomorethan 61%ofintron-containinggenes showing AS. This estimate of 61% of AS is based on analysisofplantsgrownundernormalgrowthconditions

[11]anditislikelythatthislevelwillincreasefurtheras different tissues at various developmental stages and growthconditionsareanalyzed[11].Ofthemostcommon types of AS (Figure 2b), intron retention (IR) has been showntobethemostfrequentASeventinplants[7–10]. However,someIReventswererecentlyshowntobemore likelytorepresentpartiallysplicedtranscriptsduetotheir

Glossary

Alternative50and30splicesites:useofalternativesplicesitesateitherendof theintron(intheintronorexonsequence)addsorremovessequences. Alternativesplicing:precursormRNAs(pre-mRNAs)arespliceddifferentlyto generatedifferentmRNAisoforms.

Exonskipping/inclusion:anexoncanberemovedinasinglesplicingeventor includedbytwosplicingevents.Suchexonsarecalledalternativeexonsor cassetteexons.

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNP): RNA-bindingproteins whichbindRNAinthecell.

Intronretention(IR):oneormoreintronsis/arenotremovedfromapre-mRNA. It is oftendifficultto determine whetherintron retentionisdue to DNA contaminationorpartialsplicingofpre-mRNAsatthetimeofRNAextraction orareactivelyretained.

Micro-protein(miP):micro-proteinsareusuallygeneratedbytranslationofa transcript containing a premature termination codon, lack one or more functionaldomains,andhavefewerthan100aminoacids[82].

Nonsense-mediateddecay(NMD):acellularqualitycontrolmechanismthat recognizesmRNAtranscriptscontainingPTCsandtargetsthemfordegradation. Polypyrimidinetract-bindingprotein(PTB):anhnRNPproteinwhichbinds pyrimidine-richsequencesinRNAtoregulatealternativesplicingandother mRNAbiogenesisprocesses.

PrecursormessengerRNA(pre-mRNA):theprimarytranscriptofagenewhich isprocessedtomRNA.

Premature termination codon (PTC):a translational stop codonfound in transcriptsupstreamoftheauthenticstopcodon;PTCscanbegeneratedby mutationsinDNA,errorsintranscriptionorsplicing,oralternativesplicing. Serine/arginine-rich(SR)proteins:constitutiveandalternativesplicingfactors containingRNA-bindingmotifsandaRS-richdomain.

Small-interferingpeptides(siPEPs):shortpeptideswhichinterferewithcellular processes.

Correspondingauthor:Brown,J.W.S. ([email protected]), ([email protected]).

(2)

lowabundance[11].Inaddition,inthegenome-wide analy-sisabove,IRwasstillthemostfrequentASevent(40%)but itonlyoccurredinassembledAStranscriptsof23%ofthe genesprovidingamorereasonableestimateoftheimpactof IRtoASplants(Figure2c)[11].Moreimportantly,51%of intron-containing genes utilize alternative 50 or 30 splice sitesorexonskippingeventswhichcanaffecttheprotein

codingsequenceorgenerateunproductivemRNAstoaffect transcriptlevels[11].ThewidespreadoccurrenceofASand therangeoffunctionalgenegroupswhichitaffectssupports anessentialroleforASinplantdevelopment,physiology, metabolism,andresponsestoenvironmentalconditionsand pathogens, all ofwhich have important consequences on plant/cropphenotypes[7,12–18]. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2003 2004 2006 2010 2012 1.2% 11.6% 30% 42% 61% Improved technologies, various conditions, developmental

stages and tissues

% of genes with AS Year 30% 42% 61% gies, Improved technologie men tal

various conditions, developme stages and tis

sues

TRENDS in Plant Science

Figure1.Increasingfrequencyofoccurrenceofalternativesplicing(AS)inArabidopsiswithtime.In2003,astudyusingEST(expressedsequencetag)librariesestimated thatonly1.2%ofthegenesinArabidopsisundergoAS[101].Subsequently,greatercoverageofESTsandcDNAslibrariesallowedthediscoveryofmanymoreASevents (2004–2006,[7,102–104]).Theadventofhigh-throughputtechnologies[9,11]hasresultedinsignificantincreasesinthefrequencyofAS(almost60-foldoverthepast10 years). Types of AS events (a) Intron-containing genes AS transcripts AS events +IR 23.6% –IR 74.6% IR 40% Other AS 60% +IR 9.9% –IR 51.3% AS 61% (c) (b) IR Alt 5′ ss Alt 3′ ss ES ESE ESS ISS 5′ GU AG A (Y)n 3′ ISE + – + – UA-rich

TRENDS in Plant Science

Figure2.Maintypesofalternativesplicing(AS)eventsandfrequencyinArabidopsis.(a)Splicingofpre-mRNAisdirectedbyciselementswhichincludesplicesites,branch point,andpolypyrimidinetractsequences.Selectionofalternativesplicesitesisaffectedbytrans-actingfactorsbindingtoauxiliaryexonicandintronicciselements, termedsplicingenhancersandsilencers.(b)TypesofASevents.(c)FrequencyofoccurrenceofintronretentioninArabidopsis.IntronretentionisthemostfrequentAS eventinArabidopsis(40%)butitscontributiontotranscriptdiversityismuchlower[11].Ofthe61%ofArabidopsisintron-containinggeneswithAS,51%produceAS transcriptswhichdonotinvolveintronretention(–IR).Amongalternativelysplicedtranscripts,23.6%containoneormoreretainedintrons(+IR),whereastherest(74.6%) areproducedbyotherASevents.Coloredboxes,exons;lines,introns;GU,50splicesitewhichincludeshighlyconservedGUdinucleotide;AG,30splicesitewhichincludes highlyconservedAGdinucleotide;A,branchpointadenosine;(Y)n,polypyrimidinetract;ovals,positiveandnegativesplicingregulators;carets,splicingevents;thickgray line,unspliced(retained)intron.Abbreviations:ESE,exonicsplicingenhancers;ESS,exonicsplicingsilencers;ISE,intronicsplicingenhancers;ISS,intronicsplicing silencers;Alt30ss,alternative30splicesites;Alt50ss,alternative50splicesites;ES,exonskipping;IR,intronretention.

(3)

Regulation ofalternativesplicing

Assembly of the spliceosome during intron removaland ligationofexonsisdirectedbysequencefeaturesofthe pre-mRNA.Thecissequencesinthepre-mRNAincludesplice sites, branch point, polypyrimidine tract, enhancer, and suppressor sequences (Figure 2a). In addition, it is well documentedinplantsthatUA-richnessofintrons contrib-utestotheirrecognitionandisessentialforefficient splic-ing.Thesplicesitessituatedatthetransitionbetween UA-richintronsandGC-richexonsarepreferentiallyselected forsplicing(forreviewsee[19]).Thecompositionalbiasfor UA-richnesshasbeenalwaysconsideredasa distinguish-ingfeatureofplantintrons;however,recentlyithasbeen shownalsoforanimalsthatexonshavehigherGCcontent than introns [20,21]. Regulation of AS depends on cis signalsandtheirrecognitionbytrans-actingsplicing fac-tors.Serine/arginine-rich(SR)andheterogeneousnuclear RNP (hnRNP) proteins function as constitutive and AS splicing factorscontrolling splicesite choiceina concen-tration-dependent manner [22]. SR proteins are highly conserved in metazoa andplants and, typically, contain oneortwoRNArecognitionmotifs(RRMs)anda C-termi-naldomain(CTD)richinserineandarginineresidues(RS domain). Interestingly, plants possess plant-specific SR proteinsandingeneraltheyhavealmostadoublenumber ofSRproteinsofthatinnonphotosyntheticorganisms[23]. Many of them have different spatiotemporal expression patterns, implicating diversetargetspecificities and bio-logicalfunctions[24].hnRNPproteins,bycontrast, consti-tuteastructurallydiversegroupofRNA-bindingproteins associatedwithnascentpre-mRNA moleculesand,in ad-ditiontotheirroleinsplicing,areinvolvedinavarietyof molecular processes [25]. SR and hnRNP proteins bind splicingsignalsandintronicandexonicenhancer/silencer sequencesandthroughmulticomponentinteractionswith other splicing factors (including cell- and tissue-specific factors) determine splice site selection and where the spliceosome assembles. In general, SR proteins promote splicing andthehnRNPproteinsinhibitsplicesite selec-tion.However,bothSRsandhnRNPscanalsohave oppo-site functionswith, forexample,SRSF10(also known as SRp38)[26]beinganegativeregulatorandpolypyrimidine tract-bindingprotein(PTB;alsoknownashnRNPI)beinga positiveregulator[27].

Variationinabundanceand activity ofsplicingfactors determines theAS profilesof target genes and therefore theirdifferentialexpressionunderdifferentgrowth condi-tionsandduringdevelopment[28–31].Importantly, differ-entgrowthconditionsmodulateASofSRandhnRNPgenes causing dynamic changes in the splicing factor profile, further impacting expression of target genes (Figure 3). Forexample,ASofmanyArabidopsisSRgenesisaffected bytemperature,light,salt,hormones,etc.[30–32].In addi-tion,theactivityorlocalizationofSRproteinscanbe affect-edbyphosphorylation[4,33,34]andproteinkinaseswhich phosphorylateplantSRproteinshavebeenidentified[35– 37].Notsurprisinglytherefore,SRproteinoverexpression and knockoutlines showa varietyofdevelopmental and growthphenotypes,demonstratingtheimportanceofthese proteins to normal growth and development and broad effects on gene expression [28]. The best-studied plant

hnRNP proteinstodate are the Arabidopsisorthologs of theanimalnegativesplicingregulator,PTB[38],and the glycine-richRNA-bindingproteins,GRP7andGRP8, com-ponentsofaslaveoscillatorcoupledtothecircadianclock

[39–41].TheArabidopsisPTBsauto-andcrossregulatethe

ASwithinthefamily[38].GRP7andGRP8also autoregu-late their own AS and crossregulate each other’s AS to generate unproductive mRNAs which are targeted by NMDtoreducemRNAandproteinlevels[39,41].Finally, thenuclearcap-bindingcomplex(theCBC)consistsoftwo subunits,AtCBP20andAtCBP80,andAtCBP20containsa canonical RNA-bindingdomain (RBD).Mutation ofthese subunitsshowedtheCBCtobeinvolvedinASofatleast someArabidopsisgenesandtopreferentiallyinfluenceASof thefirstintron,particularlyatthe50splicesite[42].

Althoughtheabundanceandactivityofsplicingfactors determinestheASprofilesofdownstreamgenes,veryfew

Environment development cell/tissue type Direct activation/ deactivation of SFs Transcription/AS of SF genes Altered SF profile/ activity Phenotype response Altered RNome/ proteome AS of target genes

TRENDS in Plant Science

Figure3.Dynamicregulationofexpressionbyalternativesplicing.Developmental orenvironmentalcuesactivatesignalingpathwayswhichcandirectlymodulate splicing factor activity by post-translational modifications, relocalization, etc. Signaling also directs changes in transcription of splicing factor genesand alternative splicingofthesegeneschangestheabundance, composition,and activity of the splicing factor population. Expression of other target genes including transcription factors is also modulated by alternative splicing respondingtothedynamicchangesinsplicingfactorprofiles.Changesinthe proteome feedback to transcription and alternative splicing(and other post-transcriptionalmechanisms)ultimatelygeneratingthecellularand organismal phenotypeandresponse.Boxesofcoloredbars,abundanceand/orcompositionof SFs.Abbreviations:AS,alternativesplicing;SF,splicingfactor.

(4)

examples of the biological relevance of AS-derived pro-tein isoforms of splicing factors have been published. Functionaldiversity ofAS isoforms waselegantly dem-onstrated when two isoforms of SR45 (which differ by onlyeightamino acidsandinclude putative phosphory-lation sites), differentially complemented petal or root developmental phenotypes in the sr45 mutant [43]. Hence, isoforms with very similar sequences can have substantially different morphological outcomes which willreflectahostofgeneexpressionchangesindifferent organsofthe plant.

Epigeneticcontrolofalternativesplicing

An extensive body of evidence from human and yeast showsthat splicingisoftencoupledtotranscription[44– 46].TheCTDofRNApolymeraseIIservesasalandingpad forrecruitment ofproteins involvedin capping,splicing, polyadenylation,andexport[47–52].Therateof transcrip-tionelongationbyRNApolymeraseIImayaffectsplicesite choiceandtherebyASoutcomes[45,46].Aslowerrateof transcription tends to favor inclusion of weak upstream exonsbeforethesplicingcomplexiscommittedtosplicing ofastrongerdownstream exon[45,46].Importantly, effi-ciencyofthesplicingprocessmayalsoinfluencetherateof transcription elongation, where, for example, transient pausing of RNAP II at the 30 splice site of an intron coincides with the appearance of spliced product [53]. Therateoftranscriptelongationmaydependonthe chro-matinstate[50].Forexample,nucleosomeoccupancy var-ies along a gene with GC-rich exons being relatively nucleosome-rich compared with GC poor introns

[20,21,52,54] and transcription through nucleosome-rich

regions with compact chromatin tendstobe slower [50]. Furthermore,nucleosomeoccupancyisalsolowerin alter-natively spliced exons compared with constitutively splicedexons[20].Therelationsbetweenchromatinstate, nucleosomeoccupancy,RNAPIIelongationrates,splicing efficiency,andASoutcomesarekeytounderstandingAS regulation.Indeed,adirectlinkbetweenhistone modifica-tionsandASwasdemonstratedrecently[55].Thesplicing of two PTB-dependent mutually exclusive exons in the humanfibroblastgrowthfactor receptor 2(FGFR2)gene depended on histone modifications H3K36me3 and H3K4me1 acting in one direction, and H3K27me3, H3K4me3,andH3K9me1actingintheoppositedirection. Thechangesinchromatinstatearereadbythe chromatin-bindingadapterprotein MRG15which thenrecruitsthe splicingfactorPTBtothepre-mRNA andaffectssplicing outcomes[45,46,55].Inplants,thedirectlinkbetweenAS andeither chromatin state or RNAP IIelongation rates (transcription)has notyet beendemonstrated.However, clearly the impact of environmental cues and signaling pathways on chromatin and transcription to generate different AS variants has the potential to further our understandinghowplantsrespondtotheirever-changing environment.

Alternativesplicingaffectsproteincomplexityand transcriptlevelsandstability

Thedifferent formsofAS (Figure 2b) and, inparticular, alternative50and30splicesiteselectionandexonskipping

oftenleadtochangesinproteinsequencesfromthe inclu-sionorremovalofafewaminoacids(seeaboveforSR45

[43])tolargeregionsofproteinsaffectingproteindomains, orgeneratingchangesinN-terminalorC-terminalregions

[56,57].Differentprotein isoforms havethe potentialfor

differential functions as highlighted by several recent studies.Forexample,cold-inducedsweeteningisaserious problem inpotatoeswherestarchisconverted toglucose and fructose by vacuolar acid invertase: lines showing resistancetocold-inducedsweeteninghavehigher expres-sion of two splice variants (INH2a and INH2b) of the invertaseinhibitorgene(INH2)[58].Theflavin-dependent monooxygenasegene,YUCCA4,involvedinauxin biosyn-thesis, undergoes tissue-specific AStogenerate isoforms with different intracellular localization. One isoform is expressed in all tissues and is distributed throughout thecytosol,whereas asecondisrestrictedtoflowersand is attached to the endoplasmic reticulum [59]. In silico analysis of MADS-box MIKC-type (MADS, Intervening, Keratin-likeandC-terminaldomain)transcriptionfactors in Arabidopsis predicted protein isoforms which affect dimerization properties or higher order protein complex formation[57].ThepotentialforAStoinfluencefunction wasshownbythedifferentialeffectsonfloweringtimeand floraldevelopmentofoverexpressionofisoformsofSHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, consistent with their different protein–proteininteractions[57].Thissystematicanalysis of a large gene family illustrates the potential of AS to affect key protein domains and function as well as the impactofASintheevolutionofgenefamiliesandprotein interactionnetworks.

AScanregulatemRNAlevelsthroughtheproductionof AS isoforms containing premature termination codons (PTCs) which are targeted for degradation by NMD

[60,61]. Plants possess orthologs of the key eukaryotic

NMDproteins,UPF1,UPF2,UPF3,andSMG-7(but not SMG-1,SMG-5,orSMG-6)andthesehavebeenshownto beinvolvedindegradingmRNAswithPTCs[62–68].Rules forNMDinplantshavebeenestablishedmainlyby study-ingmutationsinasmallnumberofmodeltranscripts.The mechanisms of recognitionof NMD substrates in plants appear to be fundamentally similar to those in other eukaryotes relyingonthe distance from aPTC tothe 30 end ofthe transcript (long30UTR)or downstream splice junctions(splicing-dependent)[18,64,69–71].Recently,by analyzing a large population of endogenous Arabidopsis transcripts,coupledAS,andNMDhasbeenshowntobea widespread mechanism for regulating gene expression with 11–18% of alternatively spliced transcripts being turned over by NMD [18]. This study also showed that transcripts containing PTCs which are NMD substrates areoftenreadilydetectableandcancontribute significant-ly tosteady-statetranscript levels of genes.In addition, somePTC-containingtranscriptswerenotturnedoverby NMD.Forexample,sometranscriptscontainingretained introns or parts of introns were unaffected in NMD mutants,suggestingthat notallNMDtriggeringsignals ortranscriptarrangementsareunderstood[18].Thus,the generation of unproductive AS transcripts can influence thelevelsoffunctionalmRNAs(full-lengthproteincoding), ashasbeenobservedintheregulationofhumanSRand

(5)

hnRNPproteinsthroughASandultraconservedelements

[72–74].Similarlyinplants,SRandPTBgenesare

regu-latedbyAS[28,38,75]whichgivesrisetoPTC-containing transcripts, suggesting a regulatory function via unpro-ductive mRNAs.

Alternativesplicingintheplantcircadianclock

Regulation of expressionby AS generating unproductive transcriptshasrecentlybeendemonstratedforcore circa-dian clock genes in Arabidopsis. Circadian clocks have approximately 24-hrhythms andalloworganisms to an-ticipatetheday–nightcycle andcoordinatetheirgenetic, biochemical, and physiological responses [76–78]. Core clock gene expression is regulated at multiple different levels: transcription, protein degradation, and modifica-tionwithASbeinganemergingthemeinregulationofthe clock[77,78].Untilrecently,examplesofASinclockgenes andtheirfunctionalsignificancewere rare.Forexample, anIReventinCCA1wasconservedinatleastfourplant speciesandlevelsofIR-containingtranscriptsincreasedin high light and decreased in the cold [9]. In addition, a

mutantinPROTEINARGININEMETHYL

TRANSFER-ASE 5 (PRMT5) showed a longer circadian period and dramatic changes inthe levels ofunproductive AS tran-scripts of PRR9 [79,80]. Recently, extensive AS in the majorityofthecoreclockgenesinArabidopsiswas identi-fied and dynamic changes in AS profiles for many AS events wereobservedinresponsetochangesin tempera-tureandparticularlytolowertemperatures[81].ASevents were eitherinducedbylow temperaturesor increasedin abundance to10–50% ofthe transcripts; the majority of theseeventswerenonproductiveresultinginareductionof functional mRNAs potentially impacting protein levels

[81]. Furthermore, the partially redundant gene pairs, LHYandCCA1,andPRR7andPRR9behaveddifferently with respect to AS, implying functional differences be-tween theserelatedgenes.Thus,temperature-associated AS modulatingthe balancebetween productiveand non-productive mRNA isoforms is an additional mechanism involvedintheoperationandcontroloftheplantcircadian clock.

Alternativesplicingandregulationbysmallinterfering peptides/micro-proteins

The fate of alternatively spliced transcripts containing PTCsisexpectedtobedegradationbytheNMDpathway but some PTC-containing transcripts are stable and ap-pear toavoid the NMD machinery [18]. PTC-containing transcripts also have the potentialto be translatedinto truncatedproteins orpeptides.Inplants, intron-contain-ing mRNA transcripts were found associated with poly-somes and recently ribosome profiling in mouse has identified novel upstream open reading frames (ORFs) and ORFs in long noncoding RNAs [82,83]. In animal and plant systems, small interfering peptides (siPEPs) or micro-proteins(miPs) named after theiranalogy with siRNAs and miRNAs have been described[84,85]. Such peptidescanhavealteredfunctionalitybyonlycontaining particular domains (e.g., DNA binding, transcriptional activators) and can act as both positive and negative regulators andaffect regulatoryfeedback loops [86].For

example,inanimals,anASisoformgeneratesamiPofthe ETS1 transcription factor which regulates growth and development responses, lacks the transactivation domains, and interacts physically with ETS1 blocking ETS1-mediatedexpression oftargetgenesinadominant negativemanner[86–88].Similarly,miP ASprotein iso-formsoftheanimaltranscriptionfactorMEIS2also inter-actinadominantnegativemanner[89].Interestingly,one ofthesplicevariants(MEIS2E)isstructurallysimilartoa plant protein‘KNATM’,whichisamember oftheTALE homeodomain transcription regulators (controlling meri-stem formation, organ position andmorphogenesis, and someaspectsofreproductivephase)[86].KNATM, howev-er, lacks a homeodomain and by forming nonfunctional heterodimerswiththeBELLTALEproteinregulatesleaf pattern[90,91].Itisintriguingthataproteingeneratedvia AS in animals appears to exist as a miP equivalent in plants.

Genome-wideanalysisofASinArabidopsis suggested that 78% of alternative transcripts introduced in-frame PTCs[9],providingahugepotentialforproductionofmiPs. ExamplesofmiPsinplantswithfunctionalconsequences arerare butarecentstudyshowed that theArabidopsis transcriptionfactorgene,IDD14,producesasplicevariant (IDD14b)whichlackstheDNA-bindingdomainbut inter-actswiththefunctionalIDD14aisoformtoproduce hetero-dimers.The IDD14a/b heterodimerhas reduced binding affinityfor thepromoterof theQua-QuineStarch (QQS) gene which regulates starch accumulation by initiating starch degradation [84]. Starch accumulation is one re-sponseofplantstocoldandastheIDD14bsplicevariantis onlyexpressedundercoldconditions,starchdegradationis reduced providing an AS/miP-dependent strategy for maintaining starch reserves at low temperatures. Inter-estingly,thecoreclockproteinsCCA1andLHYcanboth homo-andheterodimerize[92,93],anddifferent combina-tions have different binding affinity to their target sequences[94].Itisinteresting tospeculatewhetherthe extensiveproductionofPTC-containingtranscriptsincore clockgenesbyAScouldaddafurtherlevelofregulationby miPs.Furthermore,siPEPs/miPsofferanothermechanism tomodifyorknock-downexpressionofendogenousgenes. Artificial siPEPs/miPs encoding dimerization domains couldbetransformedintoplantstoreducetheactivityof a targetgene. As they function at the protein level and depend on homo- or heterodimerization, this should improvespecificityandreduceoff-targetsilencing[85]. Alternativesplicingdiversityinecotypesandpolyploids Extensive ASoccurs underalteredgrowth orstress con-ditionsin plants.Similarly, extensive variation in AS is expected in diverse ecotypes adapted to very different climatestherebyachievingenvironmentalandphenotypic plasticity. To address such diversity, genomic and tran-scriptomicsequencingisbeingperformedon geographical-ly and phenotypically diverse accessions of Arabidopsis. Sequencingofthegenomesandtranscriptomesof18 Ara-bidopsis accessionsidentifiedextensive singlenucleotide polymorphism and indel variation among the genotypes

[95]. When compared with Col-0 (TAIR10) one-third of protein coding genes were disrupted/altered in at least

(6)

oneaccessionalthough re-annotationrestoredcoding po-tentialinmostcases.Sequencevariationsaffected trans-lationstartandstopsites,introducedPTCs,orchangedthe frame of the coding sequence, or potentially generated protein isoforms in different accessions. Two-thirds of 2572geneswithdisruptedsplicesiteswhencomparedto TAIR10hadnewsplicesitesandaquarterofthesesites wereclose tothe splicesitesin Col-0[95].Clearly, natu-rallyoccurringsequencevariationcandisruptsplicesites andRNA-bindingmotifsfor splicingfactors. Such muta-tionsimpactproteinexpressionandactivityandprovidea basisfor selectionfor adaptationofdifferent ecotypes to theirenvironments[7,8,10,57].

Extensiveduplicationor polyploidizationhasoccurred in the evolutionary history of many plant species [96]. Theoretically,sucheventscould generateimmediateand drasticchangesintheabundance,composition,and activi-tyofsplicingfactorswhichinturncouldaffectsplicesite choice among variable analogous splice site sequences. Furthermutation,geneloss, orchanges inexpressionor protein functionality provide the basis for selection and continuedevolutionofthespecies.Recently,ASpatterns havebeenstudiedamongnaturalandsyntheticpolyploids ofBrassicanapus. Interestingly,two independently syn-thesized lines showed parallel loss of AS events after polyploidy [97]. This is intriguing because it showsthat even in two independent events ofpolyploidy, usingthe samespecies,resultsinidenticalpatternofASloss, point-ingtowardsanon-randomresponseoftheso-called ‘geno-micshock’aftertwogenomesphysicallyinteractwitheach other. The same study also showed that 26–30% of the duplicatedgenesshowchangesinAS,comparedwiththe parents,withsomeshowingorganspecificityorresponseto abiotic stress [97]. It is likely that AS has played an importantroleintheevolutionandadaptationof cultivat-edcropstodifferentenvironmentalconditionsandniches, becausemanycropspeciesare polyploidsandthiswhole areawillbeoneofgreatinterestinthefuture,particularly withthepowerofhigh-throughputsequencing.

Evolutionaryaspectsof alternativesplicingfactor diversity

TheArabidopsisgenomeencodes18SRproteinswhich is nearlydoublethenumberfoundinhumans.Atleast12ofthe 18SRgenesarelocatedinduplicatedgenomicregionsand thecurrentdataindicatethatmostofthemhavedifferent spatiotemporalexpressionpatterns,suggestingfunctional diversification[24].Indifferentplantlineages,thenumber ofparalogousSRgenesishighlyvariable.Forexample,the plant-specificRSsubfamilyofSRproteinsisencodedbyfour genesinArabidopsis,twoinrice,atleastfiveinPinustaeda andbyonegenebothinPhyscomitrellapatensand Chlamy-domonas reinhardtii[98].Differential or common, redun-dantfunctionsofSRparalogsindifferentspeciesremainto bedetermined.However,itisinterestingthatseveralSR paralogsandorthologsareregulatedbyASeventsconserved fromunicellulargreenalgae tolandplants.These events occurin theanalogous long intronssituated inthe RRM codingregions[98,99]and,moreover,theyinvolveunusually highlyconservedsequencesaroundalternativesplicesites

[98], suggesting an important biological function of such

regulation. Arecent systematic surveyofSR genes in27 eukaryoticgenomesshowedthatfloweringplantson aver-age possessnearly doublethe number ofSR genes than nonphotosyntheticspecies[23].Moreover,mostoftheplant SRgenesareunderpurifyingselection,ensuringthat para-logousgeneswhichoriginatedduetotheduplicationevents maintaintheirstructureandfunction,whereasredundancy isreducedviadiversificationofgeneexpression[23]. Futurechallengesinalternativesplicingresearchin plants

ASresearchinplantshasmadesubstantialprogressinthe past4–5years.Theever-increasingnumberofplantgenes withASandtheprocessesinwhichtheyareinvolvedpoint tothe importanceofunderstandingthe mechanisms and regulation of ASand the functions ofAS.The functional impactofASisoneofthemostimportantquestions–thisis largelyduetotherelativelysmallnumberofexamplesofAS forwhichdifferentialfunctionshavebeendemonstratedfor differentproteinisoforms.However,wedrawaparallelwith researchtodiscovertheextentofASinplants.Around10 yearsagothe firstestimatewasonly 1.2%ofplantgenes showing AS! With massively improved technologies this numberhasnowgrowntomorethan61%(Figure1). Simi-larly,theincreasingnumberofplantgenomesequencesand thegenerationofvasttranscriptomedatawillallow compu-tational analyses to identify conservation of AS events acrossspecies and tissue-,developmental-stageand envi-ronment-specific regulation of AS providing evidence of functionality. The number of functional examples of AS, whetheratthemRNAtranscriptstabilitylevelorprotein function,continuestogrowandinturnisstimulatingwider interest in AS in theplant community. High-throughput sequencing will also address dynamic changes in AS in developmentandunderdifferentenvironmentalconditions andstresses,andhowvariationinASpatternsindifferent ecotypesandpolyploidscontributestoplasticityand adap-tationofplantspecies.Furthermore,weneedtounderstand howsignalingpathwaysaffectsplicingfactoractivity direct-ly or viachromatin modification and how transcriptional andASnetworksinteract[100].ASisamajormechanismby which plants modulateand fine-tune expression oftheir genes.Thenext5yearswillseeanexplosionofknowledgeof the functional significance of AS and understanding its contributiontothecomplexityofgeneexpressionwilloffer newopportunitiesinapproachestomodifyingplantfunction forimprovedphenotypes.

Acknowledgments

ThisworkwassupportedbytheBiotechnologyandBiologicalSciences Research Council(BBSRC)[BB/G024979/1(ERA-NETPlant Genomics (PASAS)];theScottishGovernmentRuralandEnvironmentScienceand AnalyticalServicesDivision(RESAS);theAustrianScienceFund(FWF) [SFB1710,1711;DKW1207;ERA-NETPlantGenomics(PASAS)I254; SFB RNAreg F43-P10]; the Austria Genomic Program (GENAU III) [ncRNAs]; and the EU FP6 Program Network of Excellence on AlternativeSplicing(EURASNET)[LSHG-CT-2005-518238].

References

1Black, D.L.(2003)Mechanismsofalternativepre-messenger RNA splicing.Annu.Rev.Biochem.72,291–336

2Graveley,B.R.(2001)Alternativesplicing:increasingdiversityinthe proteomicworld.TrendsGenet.17,100–107

(7)

3Lareau,L.F.etal.(2004)Theevolvingrolesofalternativesplicing. Curr.Opin.Struct.Biol.14,273–282

4Stamm,S.etal.(2005)Functionofalternativesplicing.Gene344,1– 20

5Pan,Q.etal.(2008)Deepsurveyingofalternativesplicingcomplexity in thehuman transcriptomebyhigh-throughput sequencing. Nat. Genet.40,1413–1415

6Barash,Y.etal.(2010)Decipheringthesplicingcode.Nature465,53–59 7Wang, B.B. and Brendel, V. (2006) Genome-wide comparative analysis of alternative splicing in plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.103,7175–7180

8Wang,B.B.etal.(2008)Cross-speciesESTalignmentsrevealnovel andconservedalternativesplicingeventsinlegumes.BMCPlantBiol. 8,17

9Filichkin, S.A. et al. (2010) Genome-wide mapping of alternative splicinginArabidopsisthaliana.GenomeRes.20,45–58

10 Barbazuk,W.B.etal.(2008)Genome-wideanalyses ofalternative splicingin plants: opportunities and challenges.Genome Res. 18, 1381–1392

11 Marquez,Y.et al.(2012) Transcriptomesurvey revealsincreased complexity of the alternative splicing landscape in Arabidopsis. GenomeRes.22,1184–1195

12 Ali,G.S.andReddy,A.S.(2008)Regulationofalternativesplicingof pre-mRNAsbystresses.Curr.Top.Microbiol.Immunol.326,257–275 13 Chen,F.C.etal.(2007)Plantgeneandalternativelysplicedvariant annotator.A plant genome annotation pipeline forrice gene and alternatively spliced variant identification with cross-species expressed sequence tag conservation from seven plant species. PlantPhysiol.143,1086–1095

14 Halterman,D.A.etal.(2003)Powderymildew-inducedMlamRNAs arealternativelysplicedandcontainmultipleupstreamopenreading frames.PlantPhysiol.131,558–567

15 Lorkovic, Z.J. (2009) Role of plant RNA-binding proteins in development, stress response and genome organization. Trends PlantSci.14,229–236

16 Quesada,V.etal.(2003)AutoregulationofFCApre-mRNAprocessing controlsArabidopsisfloweringtime.EMBOJ.22,3142–3152 17 Zhu, J. et al. (2007) Interplay between cold-responsive gene

regulation, metabolism and RNA processing during plant cold acclimation.Curr.Opin.PlantBiol.10,290–295

18 Kalyna,M.etal.(2011)Alternativesplicingandnonsense-mediated decay modulate expression of important regulatory genes in Arabidopsis.NucleicAcidsRes.40,2454–2469

19 Lorkovic,Z.J.etal.(2000)Pre-mRNAsplicinginhigherplants.Trends PlantSci.5,160–167

20 Schwartz,S.etal.(2009)Chromatinorganizationmarksexon–intron structure.Nat.Struct.Mol.Biol.16,990–995

21 Tilgner,H.etal.(2009)Nucleosomepositioningasadeterminantof exonrecognition.Nat.Struct.Mol.Biol.16,996–1001

22 Matlin,A.J.etal.(2005)Understandingalternativesplicing:towards acellularcode.Nat.Rev.Mol.CellBiol.6,386–398

23 Richardson, D.N. et al. (2011) Comparative analysis of serine/ arginine-rich proteins across 27 eukaryotes: insights into sub-familyclassificationandextentofalternativesplicing.PLoSONE 6,e24542

24 Kalyna,M.andBarta,A.(2004)Aplethoraofplant serine/arginine-rich proteins: redundancy or evolution of novel gene functions? Biochem.Soc.Trans.32,561–564

25 Martinez-Contreras, R.etal. (2007)hnRNP proteins andsplicing control.Adv.Exp.Med.Biol.623,123–147

26 Feng,Y.etal.(2008)Phosphorylationswitchesthegeneralsplicing repressorSRp38toasequence-specificactivator.Nat. Struct.Mol. Biol.15,1040–1048

27 Xue,Y.etal.(2009)Genome-wideanalysisofPTB–RNAinteractions revealsastrategyusedbythegeneralsplicingrepressortomodulate exoninclusionorskipping.Mol.Cell36,996–1006

28 Barta,A.etal.(2008)PlantSRproteinsandtheirfunctions.Curr. Top.Microbiol.Immunol.326,83–102

29 Lazar,G.andGoodman,H.M.(2000)TheArabidopsissplicingfactor SR1isregulatedbyalternativesplicing.PlantMol.Biol.42,571–581 30 Palusa, S.G. et al. (2007) Alternative splicing of pre-mRNAs of Arabidopsis serine/arginine-richproteins: regulation by hormones andstresses.PlantJ.49,1091–1107

31Tanabe,N.etal.(2007)Differentialexpressionofalternativelyspliced mRNAsofArabidopsisSRproteinhomologs,atSR30andatSR45a,in responsetoenvironmentalstress.PlantCellPhysiol.48,1036–1049 32Duque,P.(2011)AroleforSRproteinsinplantstressresponses.Plant

Signal.Behav.6,49–54

33Stamm,S.(2002)Signalsandtheirtransductionpathwaysregulating alternativesplicing:anewdimensionofthehumangenome.Hum. Mol.Genet.11,2409–2416

34Stamm, S.(2008) Regulation of alternativesplicing by reversible proteinphosphorylation.J.Biol.Chem.283,1223–1227

35delaFuentevanBentem,S.etal.(2006)Phosphoproteomicsreveals extensiveinvivophosphorylationofArabidopsisproteinsinvolvedin RNAmetabolism.NucleicAcidsRes.34,3267–3278

36delaFuentevanBentem,S.etal.(2003)Thesubcellularlocalization ofplantproteinphosphatase5isoformsisdeterminedbyalternative splicing.PlantPhysiol.133,702–712

37Savaldi-Goldstein,S.etal.(2003)Alternativesplicingmodulationbya LAMMER kinase impinges on developmental and transcriptome expression.PlantCell15,926–938

38Stauffer, E. et al. (2010) Polypyrimidine tract-binding protein homologuesfromArabidopsisunderlieregulatorycircuitsbasedon alternativesplicinganddownstreamcontrol.PlantJ.64,243–255 39Schoning, J.C. etal.(2007)Auto-regulationof thecircadian slave

oscillatorcomponentAtGRP7andregulationofitstargetsisimpaired byasingleRNArecognitionmotifpointmutation.PlantJ.52,1119– 1130

40Schuttpelz,M.etal.(2008)Changesinconformationaldynamicsof mRNA uponAtGRP7 binding studied by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.J.Am.Chem.Soc.130,9507–9513

41Schoning,J.C.etal.(2008)Reciprocalregulationofglycine-rich RNA-bindingproteinsviaaninterlockedfeedbackloopcouplingalternative splicingtononsense-mediateddecayin Arabidopsis.NucleicAcids Res.36,6977–6987

42Raczynska,K.D.etal.(2010)Involvementofthenuclearcap-binding protein complex in alternative splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana. NucleicAcidsRes.38,265–278

43Zhang, X.N. and Mount, S.M. (2009) Two alternatively spliced isoformsoftheArabidopsisSR45proteinhavedistinctrolesduring normalplantdevelopment.PlantPhysiol.150,1450–1458

44CarrilloOesterreich,F.etal.(2010)GlobalanalysisofnascentRNA revealstranscriptionalpausinginterminalexons.Mol.Cell40,571– 581

45Luco,R.F.etal.(2011)Epigeneticsinalternativepre-mRNAsplicing. Cell144,16–26

46Luco, R.F. and Misteli, T. (2011) More than a splicing code: integrating the role of RNA, chromatin and non-coding RNA in alternativesplicingregulation.Curr.Opin.Genet.Dev.21,366–372 47de Almeida,S.F.and Carmo-Fonseca,M.(2008)TheCTDrolein cotranscriptionalRNAprocessingandsurveillance.FEBSLett.582, 1971–1976

48Fong,N.etal.(2003)A10residuemotifattheC-terminusoftheRNA polIICTDisrequiredfortranscription,splicingand30endprocessing.

EMBOJ.22,4274–4282

49Goldstrohm, A.C.etal. (2001)Thetranscription elongationfactor CA150interactswithRNApolymeraseIIandthepre-mRNAsplicing factorSF1.Mol.Cell.Biol.21,7617–7628

50Howe,K.J.(2002)RNApolymeraseIIconductsasymphonyof pre-mRNAprocessingactivities.Biochim.Biophys.Acta1577,308–324 51McCracken, S. et al. (1997) The C-terminal domain of RNA

polymerase II couples mRNA processing to transcription. Nature 385,357–361

52Schwartz, S. and Ast, G. (2010) Chromatin density and splicing destiny: on the cross-talk between chromatin structure and splicing.EMBOJ.29,1629–1636

53Alexander, R.D.etal.(2010) Splicing-dependentRNA polymerase pausinginyeast.Mol.Cell40,582–593

54Spies, N. et al. (2009) Biased chromatin signatures around polyadenylationsitesandexons.Mol.Cell36,245–254

55Luco,R.F.etal.(2010)Regulationofalternativesplicingbyhistone modifications.Science327,996–1000

56Airoldi,C.A.etal.(2010)Singleaminoacidchangealterstheabilityto specifymaleorfemaleorganidentity.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 107,18898–18902

(8)

57 Severing,E.I.etal.(2012)Predictingtheimpactofalternativesplicing onplantMADSdomainproteinfunction.PLoSONE7,e30524 58 Brummell,D.A.etal.(2011)Inductionofvacuolarinvertaseinhibitor

mRNA in potato tubers contributes to cold-induced sweetening resistanceandincludessplicedhybridmRNAvariants.J.Exp.Bot. 62,3519–3534

59 Kriechbaumer, V. et al. (2012) Alternative splicing of the auxin biosynthesis gene YUCCA4 determines its subcellular compartmentation.PlantJ.70,292–302

60 Rebbapragada, I. and Lykke-Andersen, J. (2009) Execution of nonsense-mediated mRNAdecay: whatdefinesa substrate?Curr. Opin.CellBiol.21,394–402

61 Nicholson,P.etal.(2010)Nonsense-mediatedmRNAdecayinhuman cells:mechanisticinsights,functionsbeyondqualitycontrolandthe double-lifeofNMDfactors.Cell.Mol.LifeSci.67,677–700 62 Arciga-Reyes,L.etal.(2006)UPF1isrequiredfornonsense-mediated

mRNAdecay(NMD)andRNAiinArabidopsis.PlantJ.47,480–489 63 Hori,K.andWatanabe,Y.(2005)UPF3suppressesaberrantspliced

mRNAinArabidopsis.PlantJ.43,530–540

64 Kerenyi,Z.etal.(2008)Inter-kingdomconservationofmechanismof nonsense-mediatedmRNAdecay.EMBOJ.27,1585–1595 65 Riehs,N.etal.(2008)ArabidopsisSMG7proteinisrequiredforexit

frommeiosis.J.CellSci.121,2208–2216

66 Wu,J.etal.(2007)Nonsense-mediatedmRNAdecay(NMD)silences theaccumulationofaberranttrypsinproteinaseinhibitormRNAin Nicotianaattenuata.PlantJ.51,693–706

67 Yoine,M.etal.(2006)ArabidopsisUPF1RNAhelicasefor nonsense-mediatedmRNAdecayisinvolvedinseedsizecontrolandisessential forgrowth.PlantCellPhysiol.47,572–580

68 Yoine, M.etal.(2006)Thelba1 mutation ofUPF1 RNAhelicase involved in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay causes pleiotropic phenotypic changes and altered sugar signalling in Arabidopsis. PlantJ.47,49–62

69 Kertesz,S.etal.(2006)Bothintronsandlong30-UTRsoperateas

cis-actingelementstotriggernonsense-mediateddecayinplants.Nucleic AcidsRes.34,6147–6157

70 Nyiko,T.etal.(2009)PlantupstreamORFscantrigger nonsense-mediatedmRNAdecayinasize-dependentmanner.PlantMol.Biol. 71,367–378

71 Schwartz,A.M.etal.(2006)StabilityofplantmRNAsdependsonthe lengthofthe30-untranslatedregion.Biochemistry(Mosc)71,1377–

1384

72 Lareau,L.F.etal.(2007)UnproductivesplicingofSRgenesassociated withhighlyconservedandultraconservedDNAelements.Nature446, 926–929

73 Ni,J.Z.etal.(2007)Ultraconserved elementsareassociatedwith homeostaticcontrolofsplicingregulatorsbyalternativesplicingand nonsense-mediateddecay.GenesDev.21,708–718

74 Palusa,S.G.andReddy,A.S.(2010)Extensivecouplingofalternative splicingofpre-mRNAsofserine/arginine(SR)geneswith nonsense-mediateddecay.NewPhytol.185,83–89

75 Reddy, A.S.(2007)Alternativesplicingofpre-messenger RNAsin plantsinthegenomicera.Annu.Rev.PlantBiol.58,267–294 76 Doherty,C.J.andKay,S.A.(2010)Circadiancontrolofglobalgene

expressionpatterns.Annu.Rev.Genet.44,419–444

77 Petrillo,E.etal.(2011)Alternativesplicingaddsanewlooptothe circadianclock.Commun.Integr.Biol.4,284–286

78 Staiger,D.andGreen,R.(2011)RNA-basedregulationintheplant circadianclock.TrendsPlantSci.16,517–523

79 Hong,S.etal.(2010)TypeIIproteinargininemethyltransferase5 (PRMT5) is required for circadian period determination in Arabidopsisthaliana.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.107,21211–21216 80 Sanchez,S.E.etal.(2010)Amethyltransferaselinksthecircadian clocktotheregulationofalternativesplicing.Nature468,112–116

81 James,A.B.etal.(2012)Alternativesplicingmediatesresponsesof theArabidopsiscircadianclocktotemperaturechanges.PlantCell24, 961–981

82 Ingolia,N.T.etal.(2011)Ribosomeprofilingofmouseembryonicstem cellsrevealsthecomplexityanddynamicsofmammalianproteomes. Cell147,789–802

83 Ner-Gaon,H.etal.(2004)Intronretentionisamajorphenomenonin alternativesplicinginArabidopsis.PlantJ.39,877–885

84 Seo,P.J.etal.(2011)TwosplicevariantsoftheIDD14transcription factor competitively form nonfunctional heterodimers which may regulatestarchmetabolism.Nat.Commun.2,303

85 Seo,P.J.etal.(2011)Competitiveinhibitionoftranscriptionfactorsby smallinterferingpeptides.TrendsPlantSci.16,541–549

86 Staudt,A.C.andWenkel,S.(2011)Regulationofproteinfunctionby ‘microProteins’.EMBORep.12,35–42

87 Laitem, C. et al. (2009) Ets-1 p27: a novel Ets-1 isoform with dominant-negativeeffectsonthetranscriptionalpropertiesandthe subcellularlocalizationofEts-1p51.Oncogene28,2087–2099 88 Lee,G.M.etal.(2005)ThestructuralanddynamicbasisofEts-1DNA

bindingautoinhibition.J.Biol.Chem.280,7088–7099

89 Yang,Y.etal.(2000)Three-aminoacidextensionloophomeodomain proteinsMeis2andTGIFdifferentiallyregulatetranscription.J.Biol. Chem.275,20734–20741

90 Hamant,O.andPautot,V.(2010)Plantdevelopment:aTALEstory. C.R.Biol.333,371–381

91 Magnani,E.andHake,S.(2008)KNOXlosttheOX:theArabidopsis KNATM gene defines a novel class of KNOX transcriptional regulatorsmissingthehomeodomain.PlantCell20,875–887 92 Lu,S.X.etal.(2009)CIRCADIANCLOCKASSOCIATED1andLATE

ELONGATEDHYPOCOTYLfunctionsynergisticallyinthecircadian clockofArabidopsis.PlantPhysiol.150,834–843

93 Yakir,E.etal.(2009)PosttranslationalregulationofCIRCADIAN CLOCKASSOCIATED1inthecircadianoscillatorof Arabidopsis. PlantPhysiol.150,844–857

94 O’Neill,J.S.etal.(2011)Circadianclockparametermeasurement: characterizationofclocktranscriptionfactorsusingsurfaceplasmon resonance.J.Biol.Rhythms26,91–98

95 Gan,X.etal.(2011)Multiplereferencegenomesandtranscriptomes forArabidopsisthaliana.Nature477,419–423

96 Adams,K.L. and Wendel, J.F. (2005)Allele-specific, bidirectional silencingof analcohol dehydrogenasegene in different organsof interspecificdiploidcottonhybrids.Genetics171,2139–2142 97 Zhou, R. et al. (2011) Extensive changes to alternative splicing

patterns following allopolyploidy in natural and resynthesized polyploids.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.108,16122–16127 98 Kalyna,M.etal.(2006)Evolutionaryconservationandregulationof

particularalternativesplicingeventsinplantSRproteins.Nucleic AcidsRes.34,4395–4405

99 Iida,K.andGo,M.(2006)Surveyofconservedalternativesplicing eventsofmRNAsencodingSRproteinsinlandplants.Mol.Biol.Evol. 23,1085–1094

100Blencowe,B.J.(2006)Alternativesplicing:newinsightsfromglobal analyses.Cell126,37–47

101 Zhu,W.etal.(2003)RefinedannotationoftheArabidopsisgenomeby completeexpressedsequencetagmapping.PlantPhysiol.132,469–484 102Iida,K.etal.(2004)Genome-wideanalysisofalternativepre-mRNA splicing in Arabidopsis thaliana based on full-length cDNA sequences.NucleicAcidsRes.32,5096–5103

103Xiao,Y.L.etal.(2005)AnalysisofthecDNAsofhypotheticalgeneson Arabidopsis chromosome2 reveals numerous transcript variants. PlantPhysiol.139,1323–1337

104Campbell,M.A.etal.(2006)Comprehensiveanalysisofalternative splicingin riceand comparative analyseswith Arabidopsis.BMC Genomics7,327

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

In their co-authored introduction the editors, Andrea Gamberini (University of Milan) and Isabella Lazzarini (University of Molise), underline, however, that their

This means that even if observationally we could constrain the escape fraction of the bright population to very low upper limits (or low absolute values if in the future the

Nel primo capitolo introdurremo i problemi di equilibrio, mediante i quali riformuleremo una vasta gamma di problemi, come due problemi classici, ot- timizzazione e

Adult wild boar showed lower OTA concentrations in kidneys than the young. These

Un saggio inglese di Sharon Ouditt, presente in un importante compendio sulla letteratura della Prima guerra mondiale, considera questi contributi contemporanei come parte di

A differenza, però, dei prodotti ottenuti industrialmente, non è possibile codificare rigorosamente tutte le condizioni di processo: ciascun pizzaiolo, sulla base della

For these models there are almost always multiple species of quasipar- ticles (they are bound states of the lightest species), but known integrable initial states do not

G IUSEPPE A MARELLI , Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II. R AFFAELE M UZZICA , Università degli Studi di Napoli