• Non ci sono risultati.

Adolescent Pathological Gambling: Using IRT to Construct a Scale Based on the New Gambling Disorder Criteria

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Adolescent Pathological Gambling: Using IRT to Construct a Scale Based on the New Gambling Disorder Criteria"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Adolescent Pathological Gambling:

Adolescent Pathological Gambling:

Using IRT to construct a scale based on

Using IRT to construct a scale based on

the new Gambling Disorder criteria

the new Gambling Disorder criteria

Caterina

Caterina

Primi

Primi

, Francesca

, Francesca

Chiesi

Chiesi

& Maria Anna

& Maria Anna

Donati

Donati

NEUROFARBA, Section of Psychology,

NEUROFARBA, Section of Psychology,

University of Florence University of Florence --Italy Italy

From DSM-IV to DSM-V

The name was changed from Pathological Gambling to

Disordered Gambling

The disorder was reclassified from Impulse-Control

Disorders not elsewhere classified to Substance-Related and Addictive Disorders

Nine criterions: One criterion (to commit illegal acts) was eliminated

Lower threshold for diagnosis from five to four criteria Specified time period; symptoms must be present during a 12 month time period

Aim

Since large-scale prevalence studies suggested that

adolescents are a high-risk group for developing problem

gambling, our aim was to develop a new brief scale to assess pathological gambling among adolescents (Gambling Behavior Scale for Adolescents, GBSA) referring to the DSM-V and applying Item Response Theory (IRT).

Method

Participants

1187 adolescent gamblers attending high school (59% males, mean age=15.66 years, SD=1.71). Scale development

A set of 45 items (5 for each DSM-V criterion) was developed. In a pilot study, items were evaluated at both qualitative and quantitative levels. As a result, some items were removed and other items were adapted obtaining a set of 33 items (Table 1).

Table 1. Synthesis of the steps in the development of the

Gambling Behavior Scale for Adolescents (GBSA).

We investigated the unidimensionality of the 33-item version evaluating the presence of local dependence (LD). None of the LD statistics were greater than 10, attesting the unidimensionality of the scale.

Item selection and calibration with IRT (IRTPRO software)

We tested the fit of the unidimensional two parameter model (a= discrimination, b = severity). Seven items were eliminated given a significant S-χ2value (p <.001). Then, we performed

the IRT calibration with the remaining 26 items. For each criterion we selected the item with the higher discrimination value (a > 2) (Table 1). Finally, we performed a new calibration with the remaining 9 items (Table 2).

Table 2. Item factor loadings (λ), discrimination (a) and category

threshold (b) estimates with standard errors.

The 9-item GBSA scale accurately measures from mild to high gambling severity levels.

Validity

Validity

Table 3. Validity measures

Correlations of the Gambling Behavior Scale for adolescents (GBSA) score with a DSM-III-R measure of pathological gambling in adolescents (SOGS-RA) and gambling related constructs were high and in the expected direction.

Discussion & Conclusion

Discussion & Conclusion

The GBSA is an efficient tool to assess the DSM-V Gambling Disorder criteria in adolescents.

Contact: primi@unifi.it DSM-V Criterions Initial Step: 45 items Second step: 33 items Third step: 26 item Final Step: 9 items Tolerance 5 3 3 1 Withdrawal 5 4 4 1 Loss of Control 5 4 4 1 Preoccupation 5 3 1 1 Escape 5 3 2 1 Chasing 5 4 1 1 Lying 5 4 4 1 Risk/lose relationships/opportunities 5 5 5 1 Bailout 5 3 2 1 Item DSM-V λλλλ a b1 b2 1 Tolerance .67 3.50 (0.34) 1.66 (0.10) 2.83 (0.22) 2 Withdrawal .69 2.98 (0.29) 1.55 (0.09) 2.35 (0.18) 3 Loss of Control .63 3.02 (0.38) 1.72 (0.11) 2.52 (0.18) 4 Pre-occupation .52 1.89 (0.19) 1.35 (0.10) 2.21 (0.17) 5 Escape .68 2.29 (0.25) 1.62 (0.11) 3.02 (0.24) 6 Chasing .53 1.66 (0.16) 0.82 (0.07) 2.80 (0.21) 7 Lying .58 2.53 (0.30) 1.56 (0.10) 2.56 (0.19) 8 Risk/lose relationships/opportunities .68 3.19 (0.38) 1.65 (0.10) 2.65 (0.17) 9 Bailout .70 1.84 (0.19) 1.52 (0.11) 2.87 (0.24) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 To ta l I n fo rm atio n Theta 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 S tan d a rd E rro r

Group 1, Total Information Curve

Total Information Standard Error

9th Conference of the International Test Commission July 2-5, 2014 San Sebastian -Spain SOGS-RA Cognitive distortions about gambling Gambling Behaviour Frequency GBSA .55** .65** .44**

Test Information Function

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

From the analysis of the spatial distribution of the elements of the slow network of the Sulcis, it possible to observe how the walk community mainly crosses the abandoned

The framework extension goes in the following directions: vulnerable nodes (i.e. buses or substations) are consid- ered (only links have been considered in previously cited work);

The combination screen for patient C showed that the MEK inhibitor trametinib sen- sitized the KRAS-mutant colon cancer cells to multiple drugs including celecoxib,

The meeting was intended to give an overview of the initiatives of Applied Physics in Italy and Europe, focused in particular on applications in medicine, biology, cultural

Forty five samples of commercial gum Arabic were collected on the Italian market of enological products and their botanical origin (Acacia seyal, N=30; Acacia senegal, N=15)

Dabei handelt es sich zwar um das erste Werk, welches das lutherische Denken mit der spätmittelalterlichen Scholastik in Verbindung bringt, gleichwohl aber folgt auch der Aufbau

La verifica dell'ampiezza di fessurazione può essere condotta con calcolo diretto, in cu si determina direttamente il valore di calcolo di apertura delle fessure (w d ),

La riforma si basa sull’introduzione di standard minimi di liquidità, sulla definizione di capitale regolamentare che innalza sia la qualità che la quantità della base