Corrigendum to ‘Does Gender Top Family Ties?
Within-Couple and between-Sibling Sharing of
Elderly Care’
Matteo Luppi
1,2and Tiziana Nazio
2,3,*
1National Institute of Public Policy Analysis (INAPP), Rome, Italy,
2Collegio Carlo Alberto, Turin, Italy and
3
WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin, Germany
*Corresponding author. Email: tiziana.nazio@carloalberto.orgThis is a correction notice for article jcz035 (https://doi.
org/10.1093/esr/jcz035
). The authors of the paper
would like to replace the incorrect Figure 2 with the
cor-rect version of Figure 2.
There is a minor change in the interpretation of
Figure 2: “Figure 2 also shows that daughters
(‘Female’) were on average around twice as likely as
sons to provide care to their mothers on a weekly
basis (‘Male’). The respective figure for fathers is 1.5
times.”
.6 .7 .8 .9 1Average predicted probabilities
Mother Father Mother−in−law Father−in−law dyadic relation
Female Male
Care frequency: Never
0 .03 .06 .09 .12 .15
Average predicted probabilities
Mother Father Mother−in−law Father−in−law dyadic relation
Female Male
Care frequency: About monthly
0
.02
.04
.06
Average predicted probabilities
Mother Father Mother−in−law Father−in−law dyadic relation
Female Male
Care frequency: About daily
0 .03 .06 .09 .12 .15
Average predicted probabilities
Mother Father Mother−in−law Father−in−law dyadic relation
Female Male
Care frequency: About weekly
Figure 2. Average predicted probabilities of adult children caregiving to parents(-in-law) by gender and care intensity Source: Authors’ calculation on SHARE data (waves 2 and 6, unweighted).
VCThe Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
European Sociological Review, 2019, Vol. 35, No. 6, 912 doi: 10.1093/esr/jcz050 Advance Access Publication Date: 3 October 2019 Corrigendum