• Non ci sono risultati.

Universal, not Global, science: why Open Access is crucial to the good health of scientific communication

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Universal, not Global, science: why Open Access is crucial to the good health of scientific communication"

Copied!
23
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Open Access

is

ABOUT

Scholarly communication

(2)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Journals developed as an

affordance

of

print.

(3)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Services vary with time

(4)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

The emerging digital context reveals the

constructed dimensions of journals

Journals structure communities;

Journals filter;

(5)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Journals have also affected evaluation

Journal editors organize peer review

Journals compete with each other in terms

(6)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Up to WWII, a majority of journals were under the direct control of scientists and scholars

● Scientific societies ● University presses

● Some commercial presence, relatively modest, mainly in Germany (e.g. Julius Springer)

(7)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

After WWII

Growth of the literature is enormous

Bibliographies have trouble following

(8)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Some consequences of SCI

● Science is divided into “core” and “the rest” ● “The rest” is de facto excluded

● Number of citations is linked with quality, not visibility ● A citation calculus is invented: the impact factor

(9)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Beyond journals, the impact factor becomes the basic measurement unit of scientific quality: individuals,

institutions, countries...

THIS IS THE BASIC CONDITION NEEDED TO FORM A SYSTEM

OF

(10)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

This shift is marked by a vocabulary shift:

EXCELLENCE

rather than

(11)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Robert Maxwell understood two things:

1)

Core science = inelastic market

2)

Impact factor aligns quality (baptized

as excellence) with market share

(12)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

NOW, THE SCENE IS SET

Commercial publishers can begin to take over

Consequences?

Subscription prices

soar

They become

dominant

in

“core science”

(13)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

BUT THIS IS NOT ALL!

● Large commercial publishers increasingly own journal

titles (through buy out or creation)

● Now, they CAN NAME editors

● Now they CAN SELECT publishing areas in terms of trends (fads?) observed in “core science”

(14)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Publishers

exclusively

go by the

measurement

standard

of

excellence

: the

IF

Institutions

(

universities, research centres, funders

)

(15)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Consequences:

1) A scientific oligopoly of researchers found in leading laboratories and institutions, allied with the largest

publishers STEER scientific research worldwide

2) This is the present, globalized, state of scientific research

(16)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

This is the context where

OPEN ACCESS

(17)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Only through digitization is OA possible

OA also builds on the perspectives

opened by digitization (e.g. journals and publishers as bundles of services)

It helps refocus on communication rather than means of communication

(18)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

What are the sensitive points

OA

(19)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

ACCESS

FOR

(20)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

But also:

1) Restore quality at the level of work: evaluation of all science, not just “core”

2) Restore the right to INITIATE questions anywhere

3) Add access to data to allow better reliability of results

4) Value small as well as large contributions (the free software model)

(21)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

How to get there?

1) Network repositories

2) Repackage content in many ways

3) Repackage content also according to questions, not exclusively disciplines

(22)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

In terms of Gold OA

1. Favour mega-journals

2. Avoid Article Processing Charges: they make “predatory”

journals possible

3. Refuse Hybrid journals

4. MAKE MEGA-JOURNALS AND DEPOSITORY NETWORKS

(23)

AISA 2015 – Pisa

Jean-Claude Guédon

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Accordingly, under PIT one would predict that as members of opposing cultural groups become more science literate and more adept at analytical reasoning — and thus less dependent

Using a corpus of 60 scientific research articles from six journals, this study examined the proportion of passives used, and the contexts and forms in which they occurred.. The

A BSTRACT : The first 18 volumes of the International Scientific Series published in both London and New York were reviewed to assess their contribution to transatlantic

This involvement in science can be understood as an issue of access to publications, code, and data that facilitates public engagement in the research process,

Achieving ease of understanding and reliability will be major challenges for researchers: the studies I have conducted clearly show that researchers’ writing

This article explores whether some scientists have now actually been developing a type of science apt to be published as a piece of news, yet lacking a relevant scientific

Pero no sólo se incluyó, sino que fue la noticia estrella seleccionada por el gabinete de prensa (y por los medios de comunicación de todo el mundo) del número de esa semana (el

Nei loro interventi in questo speciale, il science writer britannico Jon Turney e lo studioso statunitense Bruce Lewenstein riflettono sulla validità del libro come mezzo