• Non ci sono risultati.

Ordered distribution of Cu and Ag in the crystal structure of balkanite, Cu9Ag5HgS8

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Ordered distribution of Cu and Ag in the crystal structure of balkanite, Cu9Ag5HgS8"

Copied!
19
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Title: Ordered distribution of Cu and Ag in the crystal structure of balkanite, Cu9Ag5HgS8 Running title: Crystal structure of balkanite

Plan of the article:

Abstract 1. Introduction 2. Experimental 2.1. Crystallography 2.2. Chemical data 2.3. Micro-Raman spectrometry 3. Crystal structure description

3.1. General organization

3.2. Cation coordination and site occupancies 4. Discussion

4.1. Chemical formula of balkanite 4.2. Comparison with danielsite 5. Conclusion

Acknowledgements References

Corresponding author: Cristian Biagioni Computer: PC

OS: Windows Software: Word

Number of characters (including spaces): 20851

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

(2)

Ordered distribution of Cu and Ag in the crystal

structure of balkanite, Cu

9

Ag

5

HgS

8

Cristian Biagioni

1*

, Luca Bindi

2

1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università di Pisa, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy 2 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Via G. La Pira 4,

I-50121 Firenze, Italy

*e-mail address: biagioni@dst.unipi.it

27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38

(3)

Abstract: The crystal structure of balkanite from the San Giovanni mine, Sardinia, Italy, has

been solved by X-ray single-crystal study on the basis of 883 reflections with Fo > 4σFo, with

a final R1 = 0.055. Balkanite is monoclinic, space group P2/m, with unit-cell parameters a =

9.5539(11), b = 3.9150(4), c = 10.6424(12) Å, β = 90.047(9)°, V = 398.06(8) Å3. Its formula

derived through the single-crystal structure refinement is Cu9.00Ag4.73Hg1.00S8, with Z = 1.

Electron microprobe analysis gave the formula (Cu8.69Fe0.12Zn0.08Ni0.07)Σ8.96Ag4.63Hg0.93S8, close

to the ideal formula (Cu8.70Me2+0.30)Ag4.70HgS8, or (Cu9-xMe2+x)Ag5-xHgS8, with x = 0.3. The

crystal structure of balkanite is based on two different alternating atomic (010) layers with all atoms on special positions (at y/b = 0 and ½), having chemical composition [Cu4Ag3HgS4]+

and [Cu5Ag2S4]-, respectively. Alternatively, even if balkanite is not a layered compound, its

crystal structure could be described as formed by the alternation of two (10-1) polyedral layers, having composition [Cu7Ag3S4]2+ and [Cu2Ag2HgS4]2-. Hg is linearly coordinated, Ag

assumes a tetrahedral or a distorted octahedral coordination, whereas Cu displays a linear or planar triangular coordination. A critical comparison with the related mineral danielsite, ideally (Cu,Ag)14HgS8, is also presented.

Key-words: balkanite; crystal structure; sulfides; copper; silver; mercury; X-ray diffraction.

39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55

(4)

1. Introduction

Copper, mercury, and silver are common constituents of chalcogenides. Nevertheless, only two natural compounds are characterized by the simultaneous presence of these three elements as essential components, i.e. balkanite, Cu9Ag5HgS8 (Atanassov & Kirov, 1973), and

andreadiniite, CuHgAg7Pb7Sb24S48 (Biagioni et al., 2014b). Whereas the crystal structure of

the latter is under investigation, the structure of the former was unknown. Other species as danielsite, (Cu,Ag)14HgS8 (Nickel, 1987), or some members of the routhierite isotypic series

(e.g., the routhierite-arsiccioite pair – Biagioni et al., 2014a) can host copper, silver, and mercury, but usually only some of them can be considered as species-forming in these minerals.

Balkanite was first described from the Sedmochislenitsi Pb-Zn-Cu ore deposit, Vratsa District, Bulgaria, as grains up to 2-3 mm in size or rod-like prismatic crystals up to 0.2 mm in length (Atanassov & Kirov, 1973). Since this first description, balkanite has been reported from few localities world-wide, e.g., Leogang, Salzburg, Austria (Paar & Chen, 1985) and Röhrerbühel, Tyrol, Austria (Steiner et al., 2010). Another finding of balkanite has been briefly described by Orlandi & Campostrini (2005) from the San Giovanni mine, Sardinia, Italy, where it occurs in vugs of dolomite veins associated with cinnabar, Hg-bearing silver, jalpaite, and Hg-bearing tetrahedrite. During the study of a suite of specimens from this Italian locality, a new sample was identified through X-ray powder diffraction performed with a 114.6 mm Gandolfi camera and Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation. The crystal was then used for single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. Notwithstanding the small size of the available grain, the diffraction quality was good enough to allow the structural investigation and the solution of the crystal structure. In this paper, we describe the atomic arrangement of balkanite and discuss its crystal chemistry on the basis of new chemical data as well as a critical evaluation of literature data.

2. Experimental

2.1 Crystallography

For the X-ray single-crystal study, the intensity data were collected using a Bruker Smart Breeze diffractometer equipped with an air-cooled CCD detector, with Mo Kα radiation. The detector-to-crystal distance was 50 mm. 1103 frames were collected using ω scan mode, in 0.5° slices, with an exposure time of 90 seconds per frame. The data were corrected for the Lorentz and polarization factors and absorption using the package of software APEX2 (Bruker 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88

(5)

AXS Inc., 2004). Initially, the crystal structure was tentatively solved in an orthorhombic setting, in agreement with what inferred in the type description (Atanassov & Kirov, 2009). However, no satisfying solutions were obtained. Consequently, a pseudo-orthorhombic monoclinic cell was assumed, with the axis of 3.9 Å as the b direction, owing the best value of Rint obtained assuming this orientation. Unit-cell parameters are a = 9.5539(11), b =

3.9150(4), c = 10.6424(12) Å, β = 90.047(9)°, V = 398.06(8) Å3. No systematic absences were

observed, implying a choice of the space group P2/m, P2 or Pm. The statistical tests on the distribution of |E| values (|E2-1| = 0.847) suggested the possible centrosymmetricity of

balkanite. Consequently, the crystal structure was solved in the space group P2/m through direct methods using SHELXS-97 (Sheldrick, 2008). After having located the heavier atoms, the structure was refined using SHELXL-2014 (Sheldrick, 2008) and completed through several successive difference-Fourier maps. Nine metal and four S sites were found. Crystal data and details of the intensity data collection and refinement are given in Table 1. In a first step, the site occupation factors (s.o.f.) were refined using the following scattering curves for neutral atoms, taken from the International Tables for Crystallography (Wilson, 1992): Hg site: Hg; Cu sites: Cu; and Ag sites: Ag. A first isotropic model converged to R1 = 0.138,

suggesting the correctness of the structural model. Assuming the anisotropic displacement parameters for cations, the R1 dropped to 0.070, lowered to 0.068 assuming the anisotropy of

all the atoms. In order to check the s.o.f. of the nine cation positions, the scattering curve of Cu vs □, Ag vs □, and Hg vs □ were used. All the metal positions were found fully occupied, with the only exception represented by the Ag6 site, being partially occupied (s.o.f. 0.73). Consequently, all s.o.f. for cation sites (but Ag6) were fixed to 1. The refinement converged to R1 = 0.0547 for 883 reflections with Fo > 4σ(Fo) and 0.0665 for all 1035 independent

reflections. As a check, the site occupancy of the anion positions was refined (S vs □). They were found fully occupied and fixed accordingly. Thus, the chemical formula obtained through the crystal structure refinement is Cu9Ag4.73HgS8. The unit-cell content with atom

labels is shown in Fig. 1. The CIF file of balkanite is available as Supplementary material.

2.2 Chemical data

The crystal used for the single-crystal X-ray diffraction study was then embedded in epoxy and used for chemical analysis using a JEOL JXA-8200 electron microprobe operating in WDS (Wavelenght Dispersive Spectrometry) mode. The experimental conditions were: accelerating voltage 15 kV, beam current 10 nA, beam size 1 µm. Counting times are 25 s for peak and 10 s for background. Standards are (element, emission line): Cu metal (Cu Kα), Ag 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122

(6)

metal (Ag Lα), synthetic NiS (Ni Kα), synthetic ZnS (Zn Kα), cinnabar (Hg Mα), and synthetic FeS2 (Fe Kα, S Kα). Cadmiun and Co were sought but found below the detection

limit (0.01 wt%). Analytical results are (in wt% – average of four spot analyses): Cu 36.65(35), Ag 33.12(32), Hg 12.35(12), Fe 0.46(6), Zn 0.35(5), Ni 0.28(5), S 16.79(15), total 100.22(90). On the basis of 8 S atoms per formula unit (apfu), the empirical formula is Cu8.69(4)Ag4.63(2)Hg0.93(1)Fe0.12(2)Zn0.08(1)Ni0.07(1)S8. The valence equilibrium value Ev(%), defined

as [Σ(val+) – Σ(val–)]*100/Σ(val–), is –1.7(3).

2.3 Micro-Raman spectrometry

Unpolarized micro-Raman spectra were obtained on the same polished sample of balkanite used for the electron microprobe analysis in nearly back-scattered geometry with a Jobin-Yvon Horiba XploRA Plus apparatus, equipped with a motorized x-y stage and an Olympus BX41 microscope with a 100× objective. The Raman spectra were excited by a 532 nm light of a solid state laser attenuated to 1%. The minimum lateral and depth resolution was set to a few µm. The system was calibrated using the 520.6 cm-1 Raman band of silicon before

each experimental session. Spectra were collected through multiple acquisition with single counting times of 180 s. Backscattered radiation was analyzed with a 1800 mm-1 grating

monochromator. Peak deconvolution was performed using the software Fityk (Wojdyr, 2010).

3. Crystal structure description

3.1. General organization

Atom coordinates, site occupation factors, and displacement parameters are given in Tables 2 and 3, whereas Table 4 reports selected bond distances.

The crystal structure of balkanite is based on two different alternating atomic (010) layers with all atoms on special positions (at y/b = 0 and ½). At y/b = 0, branched chains running along c are formed by Cu7, Cu9, Ag2, Ag6, Hg, S1, and S4 sites (Fig. 2a), corresponding to the composition (assuming the full occupancy of the metal sites) [Cu4Ag3HgS4]+. If Ag6 is empty, the electroneutral cluster [Cu4Ag2HgS4] occur. At y/b = ½,

isolated clusters [Cu5Ag2S4]- can be identified; sites forming this second (010) atomic layer

are Cu3, Cu4, Cu5, Ag8, S2, and S3 (Fig. 2b).

An alternative description of the crystal structure of balkanite takes into account the coordination polyhedra. Although balkanite is not a layered compound, its crystal structure can be described as formed by the alternation of two (10-1) polyhedral layers (Fig. 3a). The 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155

(7)

first one (Fig. 3b) is formed by a ribbon composed by a central chain of edge-sharing Ag6 octahedra, running along b, and connected on both sides through corner-sharing to symmetry-related Ag2 chains of corner-sharing tetrahedra. Cu3 and Cu4 sites occur as interstitial positions within these ribbons. The layer is completed by Cu5 and Cu9 sites, connecting Ag-Cu ribbons along [10-1]. Its chemical composition can be written as [Ag-Cu7Ag3S4]2+. The second

layer (Fig. 3c) is formed by chains of edge-sharing Ag8 tetrahedra running along b, decorated on one side by triangular Cu7 sites. Two Ag-Cu chains are connected through the linearly coordinated Hg1 site. The chemical composition of this second (10-1) layer can be expressed as [Cu2Ag2HgS4]2-.

3.2. Cation coordination and site occupancies

Five independent Cu sites, three Ag positions, and one Hg site occur in the crystal structure of balkanite. The crystal structure refinement as well as bond-valence balance, calculated using the bond parameters proposed by Brese & O’Keeffe (1991) (see below), suggest a strong partitioning of copper, silver, and mercury within pure sites.

Mercury is hosted at the Hg site, displaying a typical linear coordination, with two short bond distances (Hg–S = 2.366(6) Å), comparable to those found in cinnabar (i.e. 2.368 Å – Auvray & Genet, 1973). Its bond valence sum is 2.05 valence units (v.u.).

Silver shows two different kinds of coordination: tetrahedral and octahedral. Ag2 has a distorted tetrahedral coordination, with two shorter bond distances at 2.480(8) and 2.657(8) Å and two longer ones at 2.821(5) Å. A distorted tetrahedral coordination characterizes also the Ag8 site, with two short bonds at 2.525(7) and 2.541(7) Å and two bonds at 3.003(6) Å. The coordination sphere is completed by two longer distances at 3.582(7) Å. Bond valence sums at the Ag2 and Ag8 sites are 0.99 and 0.95 v.u., respectively. The partially occupied Ag6 site has an octahedral coordination, with four equatorial bond distances at 2.811(5) Å and two apical bonds at 3.022(7) Å. Bond valence sum is 0.86 v.u.

Copper is two- or three-fold coordinated. Cu5 displays a linear coordination, with Cu– S distance of 2.197(6) Å; these bond distances are a little too long for a pure Cu site, giving a bond valence sum of 0.81 v.u. Such a kind of coordination is not common, but it was observed in few Cu sulfides, e.g. djurleite, with Cu–S distances of 2.19 Å and a S–Cu–S angle of 172° (Evans, 1979), and in Ag-sulfosalts of the pearceite-polybasite group, with Cu–S distances of 2.16-2.17 Å and a S–Cu–S angle of 180° (e.g., Bindi et al., 2006; Evain et al., 2006). The other sites (Cu3, Cu4, Cu7, and Cu9) have a triangular planar coordination, with average bond distances ranging from 2.255 Å (Cu4) to 2.320 Å (Cu9). Actually, Cu7 has a 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189

(8)

3+1 coordination, with a long Cu–S distance at 3.110(10) Å. Bond valence sums at the three-fold coordinated Cu sites range between 0.87 (Cu9) and 1.03 v.u. (Cu4).

Some short cation–cation distances occur in balkanite. The shortest distances are Cu5– Cu9 2.724(3) Å, Cu3–Cu7 2.829(5) Å, and Cu4–Ag8 2.865(5) Å, to be compared with Cu–Cu distance in copper, i.e. 2.55 Å (Suh et al., 1988).

4. Discussion

4.1. Chemical formula of balkanite

The crystal-chemical formula of balkanite, as obtained through the refinement of its crystal structure, is Cu9Ag4(Ag0.73□0.27)HgS8. This formula is not charge-balanced, with a

deficit of 0.27 positive charges. Actually, electron microprobe data indicated that a small but not negligible amount of formally divalent cations occurs, i.e. Fe, Ni, and Zn. Their total amount is 0.27 apfu. In our opinion, these elements, having Z and ionic radii close to Cu, could partially substituted this latter element, according to the following mechanism: Cu+ +

Ag+ = Me2+ + □. Consequently, the empirical formula of balkanite could be written

(Cu8.69Fe0.12Zn0.08Ni0.07)Σ8.96Ag4.63Hg0.93S8, close to the ideal formula (Cu8.70Me2+0.30)Ag4.70HgS8,

or (Cu9-xMe2+x)Ag5-xHgS8, with x = 0.3. On the basis of this formula, the density of balkanite

should be 6.30 g/cm3, in agreement with the value measured for synthetic balkanite by

Atanassov & Kirov (1973), i.e. 6.32 g/cm3.

It is noteworthy that in the type description, Atanassov & Kirov (1973) gave the results of two analyses, corresponding to the chemical formulae Cu8.78Ag4.58Hg1.04S8.00 and

Cu8.76Ag4.69Hg1.04S8, both showing a significant Ag deficit coupled with a Cu content lower

than the ideal one. Unfortunately, these authors did not verify the presence of minor components (e.g., Fe). Similarly, Paar & Chen (1985) did not report the occurrence of other elements than Cu, Ag, Hg, and S in balkanite. These authors gave two chemical analyses: the first one gave the chemical composition Cu8.65Ag4.67Hg1.04S8, in agreement with that obtained

by Atanassov and Kirov (1973). On the contrary, the second one showed a strong (and unrealistic, taking into account the crystal structure of balkanite) cation excess, with a formula Cu9.19Ag5.53Hg0.9S8. Finally, electron microprobe analyses of this Cu-Ag-Hg sulfide were

performed by Steiner et al. (2010) on very small grains (up to 30 µm in size) included in tetrahedrite. Among eleven spot analyses, nine have a cation excess (up to 15 apfu), probably as the result of S underestimation. However, the presence of minor components in balkanite, such as Fe, Zn, and Cd, was reported, in agreement with our results.

190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222

(9)

4.2. Comparison with danielsite

Danielsite, ideally (Cu,Ag)14HgS8, was described in a supergene assemblage from a

quartz vein near Coppin Pool, Western Australia (Nickel, 1987). Electron microprobe data gave the formula Cu8.54Ag5.43Hg0.98S8.05, close to that of balkanite, having ΣMe = 14.95 apfu.

Furthermore, the reflectivities of the two minerals are quite similar, whereas anisotropism, microhardness, and X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns are different (Nickel, 1987). Actually, the XRPD data of danielsite were of poor quality, giving broad diffraction peaks and being collected using a polyphasic grain with danielsite associated to anglesite. Consequently, the orthorhombic unit-cell parameters proposed on the basis of their XRPD pattern (a = 9.644, b = 9.180, c = 18.156 Å – Kato & Nickel, 1988) cannot be accepted with confidence.

Steiner et al. (2010) reported the Raman spectrum of balkanite from Röhrerbühel, Tyrol, Austria, and compared it with those of danielsite reported by the Rruff project (Lafuente et al., 2015). Unfortunately, the two Raman spectra of danielsite have a very low quality and any conclusion about the similarity or differences between balkanite and danielsite is questionable. On the contrary, the Raman spectrum given by Steiner et al. (2010) is in agreement with that observed during this study (Fig. 4). As typical for sulfides (e.g., Mernagh & Trudu, 1993), the Raman spectrum of balkanite displays its characteristic and intense bands between 250 and 450 cm-1. Actually, only one relatively large band was

observed, corresponding to the convolution of bands at 218, 257, 291, and 319 cm-1. These

values can be compared with those reported by Steiner et al. (2010), i.e. 306 and 325 cm-1.

5. Conclusion

The solution of the crystal structure of balkanite allows a better description of this rare mineral species and the understanding of its unusual crystal-chemistry, with the simultaneous occurrence of copper, silver, and mercury as essential components. Indeed, balkanite is the only well-characterized mineral in the ternary system Ag2S–Cu2S–HgS. In order to achieve a

better knowledge of this system, a more accurate characterization of danielsite, ideally (Cu,Ag)14HgS8, is mandatory, aiming at clarifying its relatioships with balkanite.

In our opinion, danielsite could represent a disordered variant of the balkanite structure. The Me+

14HgS8 (Me+ = Cu and Ag) stoichiometry could give rise to two different

members (likely occurring in nature as discrete minerals), which would present the same high 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255

(10)

temperature structure and be observed at room temperature either in their high-temperature form (likely danielsite) or in the low-temperature fully ordered form (balkanite), likely with a transition temperature slightly above room temperature. An investigation by means of in situ single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiments of the possible phase transition in balkanite will be mandatory in order to verify such a hypothesis.

Acknowledgements

Mauro Astolfi and Paolo Stara provided us with the studied specimen of balkanite.

References

Atanassov, V.A., Kirov, G.N. (1973): Balkanite, Cu9Ag5HgS8, a new mineral from the

Sedmochislenitsi mine, Bulgaria. Am. Mineral., 58, 11–15.

Auvray, P., Genet, F. (1973): Affinement de la structure cristalline du cinabre α-HgS. Bull. Soc. Fr. Mineral. Cristallogr., 96, 218–219.

Biagioni, C., Bonaccorsi, E., Moëlo, Y., Orlandi, P., Bindi, L., D’Orazio, M., Vezzoni, S. (2014a): Mercury-arsenic sulfosalts from the Apuan Alps (Tuscany, Italy). II. Arsiccioite, AgHg2TlAs2S6, a new mineral from the Monte Arsiccio mine: occurrence,

crystal structure and crystal chemistry of the routhierite isotypic series. Mineral. Mag.,

78, 101–117.

Biagioni, C., Moëlo, Y., Orlandi, P., & Paar, W.H. (2014b): Andreadiniite, IMA 2014-049. CNMNC Newsletter No. 22, page 1244. Mineral. Mag., 78, 1241–1248.

Bindi, L., Evain, M., Menchetti, S. (2006): Temperature dependence of the silver distribution in the crystal structure of natural pearceite, (Ag,Cu)16(As,Sb)2S11. Acta Crystallogr., B62, 212–219.

Brese, N.E., O’Keeffe, M. (1991): Bond-valence parameters for solids. Acta Crystallogr.,

B47, 192–197.

Bruker AXS Inc. (2004): APEX 2. Bruker Advanced X-ray Solutions, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Evain, M., Bindi, L., Menchetti, S. (2006): Structural complexity in minerals: twinning, polytypism and disorder in the crystal structure of polybasite, (Ag,Cu)16(Sb,As)2S11.

Acta Crystallogr., B62, 447–456.

Evans, H.T. (1979): The crystal structures of low chalcocite and djurleite. Z. Kristallogr., 150, 299–320. 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288

(11)

Kato, A., Nickel, E.H. (1988): Possible unit cell for danielsite. Am. Mineral., 73, 187–188. Lafuente, B., Downs, R.T., Yang, H., Stone, N. (2015): The power of databases: the RRUFF

project. In: Highlights in Mineralogical Crystallography, Armbruster T. & Danisi, R.M., eds. Berlin, Germany, W. De Gruyter, 1–30.

Mernagh, T.P., Trudu, A.G. (1993): A laser Raman microprobe study of some geologically important sulphide minerals. Chem. Geol., 103, 113–127.

Nickel, E.H. (1987): Danielsite: a new sulfide mineral from Western Australia. Am. Mineral,

72, 401–403.

Orlandi, P. & Campostrini, I. (2005): Zibaldone. Aggiornamenti di mineralogia italiana 2004. Riv. Mineral. Ital., 29, 184–191.

Paar, W.H., Chen, T.T. (1985): Zur Mineralogie von Cu-Ni(Co)-Pb-Ag-Hg-Erzen in Revier Schwarzleo bei Leogang, Salzburg, Österreich. Mitt. österr. geol. Ges., 78, 125–148. Sheldrick, G.M. (2008): A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr., A64, 112–122.

Steiner, M., Tropper, P., Vavtar, F., Kaindl, R., Krismer, M. (2010): Balkanite from the Cu ore deposit Röhrerbühel, Kitzbühel (N-Tyrol, Austria). N. Jb. Mineral. Abh., 187, 207– 215.

Suh, I.-K., Ohta, H., Waseda, Y. (1988): High-temperature thermal expansion of six metallic elements measured by dilation method and X-ray diffraction. J. Mater. Sci., 23, 757– 760.

Wilson, A.J.C. (1992): International Tables for Crystallography Volume C. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

Wojdyr, M. (2010): Fityk: a general-purpose peak fitting program. J. Appl. Cryst., 43, 1126– 1128. 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311

(12)

Table captions

Table 1. Crystal data and summary of parameters describing data collection and refinement

for balkanite.

Table 2. Atom coordinates, site occupation factor (s.o.f.), and equivalent isotropic

displacement parameters (in Å2) in balkanite.

Table 3. Anisotropic displacement parameters (in Å2) in balkanite. Table 4. Selected bond distances (in Å) in balkanite.

Figure captions

Figure 1. Projection along b of the unit cell of balkanite. Circles represent Ag (grey), Hg

(light violet), Cu (blue), and S (yellow) sites, in order of decreasing size.

Figure 2. Projection along b of the atomic layers at y/b = 0 (a) and y/b = ½. Same symbols as

in Figure 1.

Figure 3. Organization of the crystal structure of balkanite according to (10-1) layers. Figure 4. Micro-Raman spectrum of balkanite.

312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326

(13)

Table 1. Crystal data and summary of parameters describing data collection and refinement

for balkanite.

Crystal data

X-ray formula Cu9.00Ag4.73Hg1.00S8

Crystal size (mm3) 0.13 x 0.02 x 0.02

Cell setting, space group Monoclinic, P2/m

a, b, c (Å);

α, β, γ (°) 9.5539(11), 3.9150(4), 10.6424(12)90, 90.047(9), 90

V (Å3) 398.06(8)

Z 1

Data collection and refinement

Radiation, wavelength (Å) Mo Kα, λ = 0.71073 Temperature (K) 293 Maximum observed 2θ (°) 54.83 Measured reflections 3738 Unique reflections 1035 Reflections Fo > 4σ(Fo) 883

Rint after absorption correction 0.0296

0.0325 Range of h, k, l 12 ≤ h ≤ 12, 5 ≤ k ≤ 5, 13 ≤ l ≤ 12 R [Fo>4 σ Fo] 0.0547 R (all data) 0.0665 wR (on Fo2) 0.1756 Goof 1.286

Number of least-squares parameters 74

Maximum and minum residual peak (e/Å3) 2.79 (at 1.30 Å from S1)

-1.70 (at 1.70 Å from Cu5)

327 328

(14)

Table 2. Atom coordinates, site occupation factor (s.o.f.), and equivalent isotropic

displacement parameters (in Å2) in balkanite.

Site Wyckoff s.o.f. x/a y/b z/c Ueq

Hg1 1a Hg0.25 0 0 0 0.0235(4) Ag2 2m Ag0.50 0.3107(3) 0 0.8522(3) 0.0569(10) Cu3 2n Cu0.50 0.4110(4) ½ 0.6235(4) 0.0340(9) Cu4 2n Cu0.50 0.1080(4) ½ 0.6932(4) 0.0317(9) Cu5 1e Cu0.25 ½ ½ 0 0.0285(12) Ag6 1c Ag0.183(4) 0 0 ½ 0.0433(20) Cu7 2m Cu0.50 0.3233(5) 0 0.4484(4) 0.0471(12) Ag8 2n Ag0.50 0.8116(3) ½ 0.7339(2) 0.0570(10) Cu9 2m Cu0.50 0.6342(4) 0 0.8692(4) 0.0300(9) S1 2m S0.50 0.0440(8) 0 0.7813(6) 0.0222(14) S2 2n S0.50 0.2111(7) ½ 0.5026(6) 0.0235(14) S3 2n S0.50 0.7255(7) ½ 0.9597(6) 0.0186(13) S4 2m S0.50 0.5007(8) 0 0.6936(7) 0.0296(16)

Table 3. Anisotropic displacement parameters (in Å2) in balkanite.

Site U11 U22 U33 U23 U13 U12 Hg1 0.0286(8) 0.0245(8) 0.0174(7) 0 0.0044(6) 0 Ag2 0.0343(14) 0.107(3) 0.0296(14) 0 0.0083(11) 0 Cu3 0.030(2) 0.043(2) 0.029(2) 0 -0.0038(15) 0 Cu4 0.037(2) 0.024(2) 0.035(2) 0 0.0120(16) 0 Cu5 0.019(2) 0.025(3) 0.041(3) 0 0.011(2) 0 Ag6 0.037(3) 0.033(3) 0.060(4) 0 -0.019(2) 0 Cu7 0.056(3) 0.039(2) 0.046(3) 0 0.017(2) 0 Ag8 0.047(2) 0.103(3) 0.0207(12) 0 0.0019(11) 0 Cu9 0.031(2) 0.025(2) 0.034(2) 0 0.002(2) 0 S1 0.033(4) 0.013(3) 0.020(3) 0 0.005(3) 0 S2 0.022(3) 0.033(4) 0.016(3) 0 -0.002(2) 0 S3 0.017(3) 0.014(3) 0.025(3) 0 0.002(2) 0 S4 0.028(4) 0.038(4) 0.023(3) 0 0.002(3) 0 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337

(15)

Table 4. Selected bond distances (in Å) in balkanite.

Hg1 – S1 2.367(6) × 2 Ag2 – S4 2.480(8) Cu3 – S4 2.263(4) × 2

– S3 3.300(5) × 4 – S1 2.657(8) – S2 2.301(8)

– S3 2.821(5) × 2

Cu4 – S1 2.255(4) × 2 Cu5 – S3 2.197(6) × 2 Ag6 – S2 2.811(5) × 4

– S2 2.256(8) – S1 3.020(7) × 2

Cu7 – S4 2.261(8) Ag8 – S2 2.526(7) Cu9 – S4 2.262(9)

– S2 2.305(4) × 2 – S3 2.541(7) – S3 2.349(4) × 2

– S4 3.110(10) – S1 3.003(6) × 2

(16)

Figure 1. Projection along b of the unit cell of balkanite. Circles represent Ag (grey), Hg

(light violet), Cu (blue), and S (yellow) sites, in order of decreasing size. 339

340

341 342

(17)

Figure 2. Projection along b of the atomic layers at y/b = 0 (a) and y/b = ½. Same symbols as in Figure 1. 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364

(18)

Figure 3. Organization of the crystal structure of balkanite according to (10-1) layers. 365

366

(19)

Figure 4. Micro-Raman spectrum of balkanite.

368

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Other outcrops referred to the Ussana Fm exist: they are located far from the edge of the Sardinian rift, in inner areas of Eastern Sardinia (Sarcidano, Gerrei): here the

Therefore, the aim of the present work was to investigate the effects of an early period of mild or severe quantitative feed restriction fol- lowed by refeeding energy and

Il motivo della comparazione con la donna prosegue anche nei versi successivi, investendo così l’intero sonetto; tale continuità tematica tra fronte e sirma, immediatamente

«Gli istituti della responsabilità civile nel diritto italiano e comparato», Ricerca svolta presso il Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza dell’Università degli Studi di Napoli

Il seminario ha dunque permesso ai partecipanti di farsi un’idea della vastità e della ricchezza delle fonti vaticane per lo studio della storia non solo della Chiesa, ma

This is the first case report that highlights and analyses the logistic difficulties of managing a mass carbon monoxide poisoning in different health care settings, with a high in flux

These were: work-related stress dimensions (job demand, job control and job support scores), age, education, operating location, duration of employment, shift work schedule,

A ciò si aggiunga che la manomissione degli oggetti antichi per parte di umanisti fantasiosi e poco dotati di rigore scientifico era già criticata in età umanistica,