• Non ci sono risultati.

Bibliografia 1.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Bibliografia 1."

Copied!
6
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Bibliografia    

1. Kobayashi,  S.,  Saito,  N.,  Horiuchi,  H.,  Iorio,  R.,  &  Takaoka,  K.  (2000).  Poor  bone   quality  or  hip  structure  as  risk  factors  affecting  survival  of  total-­‐hip  arthroplasty.  

Lancet,  355(9214),  1499–504.  doi:10.1016/S0140-­‐6736(00)02164-­‐4  

2. Kroger    H,    Kotaniemi    A,    Kroger    L,    Alhava    E.    Development    of    bone    mass    and    bone    density  

of    the    spine    and    femoral    neck-­‐

   a    prospective    study    of    65    children    and    adolescents.    Bone   Miner    1993;    23:171-­‐182  

3. Santavirta    S,    Konttinen    YT,    Bergroth    V,    Eskola    A,    Tallroth    K,    Lindholm    TS.    Aggress ive  

granulomatous    lesions    associated    with    hip    arthroplasty.    Immunopathological    stu dies.    J  

Bone    Joint    Surg    (A)    1990;    2:252-­‐258  

4. Huiskes    R.    The    various    stress    patterns    of    press-­‐ fit,    ingrown,    and    cemented    femoral  

stems.    Clin    Orthop    Res    1990;    261:27-­‐38  

5. Bobyn    JD,    Mortimer    ES,    Glassman    AH,    Engh    CA,    Miller    EJ,    Brooks    CE.    Producing     and  

avoiding    stress    shielding:    Laboratory    and    clinical    observations    of    noncemented    t otal    hip  

arthroplasty.    Clin    Orthop    1992;    274:79-­‐96  

6. Sychterz    CJ,    Engh    CA.    The    influence    of    clinical    factors    on    periprosthetic    bone   remodelling.    Clin    Orthop    Res    1996;    322:285-­‐292  

7. Engh    CA,    McGovem  TF,    Bobyn    JD,    Harris    WH.    A    quantitative    evaluation    of  peripr ostheticboneremodeling    after    cementless    total    hip    arthroplasty.    J    Bone    Joint    Sur g    (A)    1992;  7:1009-­‐1020  

8. Kilgus    DJ,    Shimaoka    EE,    Tipton    JS,    Eberle    RW.    Dual-­‐energy    x-­‐ray    absorptiometry   measurement    of    bone    minerai    density    around    porous-­‐

coated    cementless    femoral  

implants.    J    Bone    Joint    Surg    (B)    1993;    2:279-­‐287  

9. Kiratli    BJ,    Heiner    JP,    McBeath    AA,    Wilson    MA.    Determination    of    bone    minerai    de nsity    by  

dual-­‐energy    x-­‐

(2)

Orthop    Res    1992;    10:836-­‐844  

10. Mazess    R,    Collick    B,    Trempe    J,    Barden    H,    Hanson    J.    Perfomance    of    a    dual-­‐ energy    x-­‐ray  

bone    densitometer.    Calcif    Tissue    Int    1989;    44:228-­‐232  

11. National  Joint  Registry,  UK,  2012.  

12. Berry    DJ,    Harmsen    WS,    Cabanela    ME,    Morrey    BF.    Twenty-­‐five-­‐ year    survivorship    of    two  

thousand    consecutive    primary    Charnley    total    hip    replacements.    J    Bone    Joint    Sur g    (A)  2002;2:171-­‐17  

13. Malchau    H,    Herberts    P,    EsilerT,    Garellick    G,    Sòderman    P.    The    Swedish    total    hip   replacement    register.    J    Bone    Joint    Surg    (A)    2002;    S2:S2-­‐S20  

14. Karlson    EW,    Mandi    LA,    Aweh    GN,    Sangha    O,    Liang    MH,    Grodstein    F.    Total    hip   replacement    due    to    osteoarthritis:    The    importance    of    age,    obesity,    and    other    m odifiable  risk    factors.    Am    J    Med    2003;    1:93-­‐98  

15. (Registro  italiano  artroprotesi  (RIAP):  stato  dell’arte  –  GIOT  Giugno  2013  XXXIX,   Fascicolo).      

16. Harkess    JW.    Arthroplasty    of    hip.    In:    Canale    ST.    eds.    Campbell's    Operative    Ortho paedics.  St.    Louis,    MI,    USA;    Mosby;    1998:    381-­‐424  

17. Charnley   J.   Total   hip   replacement   by   low   friction   arthroplasty.   Clin   Or-­‐   thop   1970;72:7  

18. PNLG-­‐Revisione   sistematica   sulle   protesi   d’anca:   affidabilità   dell’impianto   Programma   nazionale   per   le   linee   guida   Ministero   della   Salute-­‐Pubblicazione   Settembre  2004,  Aggiornato  Settembre  2007  

19. Registro  Nazionale  Artroprotesi  RIAP  (GIOT  Giugno  2013;  39:90-­‐95)  

20. Siopack   JS,   Jergesen   HE.   Total   Hip   Arthroplasty.   Western   Journal   of   Medicine,   1995.  

21. Wolff   J:   The   law   of   bone   remodelling.   Berlin   Heidelberg   New   York,   Springer;   1986  

22. Weinams   H,   Huiskes   R,   Grootenboer   HJ.   Effects   of   fit   and   bonding   characteristics  of  femoral  stems  on  adaptive  bone  remodeling.  J  Bio-­‐  mech  Eng   1994;116(4):  393-­‐400  

23. Weinans  H,  Huiskes  R,  Grootenboer  HJ.  Quantitative  analysis  of  bone  reactions   to   relative   motions   at   implant-­‐bone   interfaces.   J   Biomech   1993;26(11):1271-­‐ 1281  

24. Bisfosfonati  e  protesi  articolari.  Giovanni  Iolasco(ricercatore  del  Dipartimento  di   Chirurgia  Ortopedica,  Traumatologia  e  Riabilitazione,  II  Università  di  Napoli).  

(3)

25. Analisi  dello  sforzo  meccanico  all'interfaccia  osso  corticale-­‐stelo  protesico  nella   protesi  di  anca  mediante  il  metodo  degli  elementi  finiti.  U.Andreus;  M.Collaca  -­‐   Giot.  2006;32:198:204.  

26. Bobyn    JD,    Mortimer    ES,    Glassman    AH,    Engh    CA,    Miller    EJ,    Brooks    CE.    Producing     and  

avoiding    stress    shielding:    Laboratory    and    clinical    observations    of    noncemented    t otal    hip  

arthroplasty.    Clin    Orthop    1992;    274:79-­‐96  

27. Huiskes    R,    Weinans    H,    van    Rietbergen    B.    The    relationship    between    stress    shieldi ng    and  

bone    resorption    around    total    hip    stems    and    effects    of    flexible    materials.    Clin    Ort hop    1992;  

274:124-­‐134.      

28. Maloney    WJ,    Sychterz    C,    Bragdon    C,    McGovern    T,    Jasty    M,    Engh    CA,    Harris    WH.   Skeletal    response    to    well    fixed    femoral    components    inserted    with    and    without    c ement.  

Clin    Orthop    Res    1996;    333:15-­‐26    

29. Sychterz  CJ  et  al.  Clin  Orthop  2001,  389:218-­‐227  

30. Kilgus  DJ  et  al.  J  Bone  Joint  Surg  1993,  75-­‐B:279-­‐87  

31. Glassman  AH  et  al.  Orthop  trans  1993,  16:702  17.     32. Mulroy  WF  et  al.  J  Bone  Joint  Surg  (Am)  1996,  78:325-­‐330  

33. Traina  GC  et  al.  Bone  Miner  1994,  25(Suppl.2):5S47    

 

34. Wooley  PH  et  al.  Gene  Therapy  2004,11  :402-­‐407.   35. Maguire  Jr  JK  et  al.  Clin  Orthop  1987,  216:213-­‐223.   36. Perry  MJ  et  al.  Br  J  Rheumatol  1995,  34  :1127-­‐1134.     37. Santavirta  S  et  al.  J  Bone  Joint  Surg  (Am)  1990,  72:252-­‐258.   38. Eftekhar  NS  et  al.  Hip  1985:169-­‐183  

39. Lassus  J  et  al.  Clin  Orthop  1998,  352:7-­‐15   40.  Xu  JW  et  al.  Rheumatol  Int  1998,  17:215-­‐221    

41. Brennan  FM  et  al.  Curr  Opin  Immunol  1992,  4:754-­‐759     42. Xu  JW  et  al.  Clin  Rheumatol  1997,  16  :243-­‐248    

43. Shanbhag  AS  et  al.  J  Biomed  Mater  Res  1998,41:497-­‐503     44. Horowitz  SM  et  al.  J  Biomed  Mater  Res  1998,41:468-­‐473    

(4)

45. Wang  JY  et  al.  Biomaterials  1996,17:2233-­‐2240   46.  Zysk  SP  et  al.  Clin  Orthop  2005,  433  :258-­‐264  

47. Rae   T.   A   study   on   the   effect   of   particulate   metals   of   orthopaedic   interest   on   murine  macrophage  in  vitro.  J  Bone  Joint  Surg  (Br)  1975;57:444-­‐450  

48. Pazzaglia  UE,  dell’Orbo  C,  Wilkinson  MJ.  The  Foreign  Body  Reaction  in  Total  Hip   Arthroplasties.  Arch  Orthop  Trauma  Surg  1987;106:209-­‐  219  

49. PazzagliaUE,PringleJAS.Boneresorptioninvitro:macrophagesand   giant   cells   from   failed  total  hip  replacement  versus  osteoclasts.  Biomaterials  1989;10  

50. Maloney  WJ  et  al.  J  Bone  Joint  Surg  (Am)  1995,  77:1301-­‐1310     51. Clohisy  D.  J  Bone  Joint  Surg  2003,  85  A  (Suppl  1)  

52.

Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA.

Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J

Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Mar 2;93(5):500- 9.

53.

Bobyn JD, Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Weatherly GC. The

optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced

metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. Clin Orthop Relat

Res. 1980 Jul-Aug(150):263-70.

54.

Aesculap® Metha®. Short Hip Stem System. Evolving

the State of Arthroplasty. 2011 2011 [cited 2011 10.01];

Available from:

http://www.aesculap-extra.net/public/frame_doc_index.html?

med_id=100052594

55.

Aesculap Orthopaedics Plasmapore® µ-CaP. Bioactive

porous coating. 2011 [cited 2011; Available from:

http://www.aesculap-

extra.net/public/frame_doc_index.html?med_id=1000526

32

56.  

Albanese  CV  et  al:  Bone  remodelling  in  THA:  A  comparative  DXA  scan  

study    between  conventional  implants  and  a  new  stemless  femoral  

component.  A  preliminary  report.  Hip  Int  2006,  16(suppl  3):S9-­‐1

  57. Bobyn    JD,    Mortimer    ES,    Glassman    AH,    Engh    CA,    Miller    EJ,    Brooks    CE.    Producing    and  

(5)

58. F.Pipino.Tissue-­‐sparing  surgery  (T.S.S.)  in  hip  and  knee  arthroplasty.  Journal  of  Orthopaedics  and   Traumatology;  March  2006,  Volume  7,  Issue  1,  pp  33-­‐35.  

59.

Eingartner C. Current trends in total hip arthroplasty.

Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):8-14.

  60.

Falez F, Casella F, Panegrossi G, Favetti F, Barresi C.

Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems. J Orthop

Traumatol. 2008 Mar;9(1):49-54.

 

61.

Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS. Effect of neck

resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip

replacement. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1995

Oct;24(10):766-70.

 

62.

Jasty M, Krushell R, Zalenski E, O'Connor D, Sedlacek

R, Harris W. The contribution of the nonporous distal

stem to the stability of proximally porous- coated canine

femoral components. J Arthroplasty. 1993 Feb;8(1):33-41.

 

63.

20. Aesculap® Metha®. Short Hip Stem System.

Evolving the State of Arthroplasty. 2011 2011 [cited 2011

10.01]; Available from:

http://www.aesculap-extra.net/public/frame_doc_index.html?

med_id=100052594

64.

21. Aesculap Orthopaedics Plasmapore® µ-CaP.

Bioactive porous coating. 2011 [cited 2011; Available

from:

http://www.aesculap

extra.net/public/frame_doc_index.html?med_id=1000526

32

65. Sculco TP, Jordan LC. The mini-incision approach to total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2004;53:141-7.

66. Dorr  LD.  The  appeal  of  the  mini-­‐incision.  Orthopedics  2004;27:937-­‐8.  

67. DiGioia AM, Blendea S, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ. Less invasive THA using navigational tools. Instr Course Lect 2004;53:157-64.

68. DiGioia AM, Blendea S, Jaramaz B, Levison TJ. Less invasive THA using navigational tools. Instr Course Lect 2004;53:157-64.

69. Morrey BF, Adams RA, Kessler M. A conser- vative femoral replacement for total hip

arthroplasty. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000;82:952-8.

70. Briem D, Schneider M, Bogner N, et al. Mid-term results of 155 patients treated with a

collum femoris preserving (CFP) short-stem prosthesis. Int Orthop 2011; 35:655-60.

71. Ettinger M, Ettinger P, Lerch M, et al. The NANOS short-stem in total hip arthroplas- ty: a

(6)

mid term follow-up. Hip Int 2011;21:583-6.

72. Hube R, Zaage M, Hein W, Reichel H. Early functional resul- ts with the Mayo-hip, a short stem system with metaphyseal-

intertrochanteric fixation. Orthopade 2004;33:1249-58.

73.

Matthias Lerch & Annelene von der Haar-Tran & Henning Windhagen & Bernd A.

Behrens &Patrick Wefstaedt & Christina M. Stukenborg-Colsman.

Bone

remodelling around the Metha short stem in

total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy

X-ray absorptiometry study;

International Orthopaedics (SICOT)

(2012) 36:533–538 DOI 10.1007/s00264-011-1361-0

74. Femoral Neck Cut Level Affects the Postioning of Modular Short-Stem ImplantWilliam M Mihalko, MD, PhD; Khaled J. Saleh, MD, MSC: Markus O. Heller, PhD; Benoit Mollard, MSc; Christian Konig. MSc; Sergej Kammerzell, MD, MSc. 2009

75.

ONG

Influence of Length and Medial-Lateral Geometry on Femoral Stem Biomechanics

76. Outcomes of Short Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty. Samik Banerjee, MD; Robert Pivec, MD; Kimona Issa, MD; Steven F. Harwin, MD; Michael A. Mont, MD; Harpal S. Khanuja, MD

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Finally, to the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence that D C A should affect muscle COX activity in vivo (in vitro addition of drug does not alter COX

The failure of the Sgorigrad tailings dam occurred after three days of heavy rains. The basin was in “high pond” conditions and the tailings were saturated. The decant towers had

We also compared capture and recapture rates of Savi’s pine voles in three different trap types: INRA, Longworth and Ugglan.. If properly equipped with food and nesting

Zu dieser Deutung würde sich auch ein anderes Faktum sehr schön fügen: Patriarch Poppo hätte diesfalls sein Restaurationswerk in Aquileia zwar in einer nicht

Pvrl1 mRNA and its protein product nectin-1 are strongly reduced in p63 null embryonic skin at E14.5-E16.5, whereas the expression of the other Pvrl family member Pvrl4 is

The 1948, the Nakba, as the Palestinian refers to the establishment of Israel, represents a watershed in the history of the Middle East that not only paved the way for

MTT analysis of cell viability of (A) TUBO and (B) SKBR3 cells incubated for 24, 48 and 72 h with a 1:50 dilution of sera pooled from control or vaccinated BALB-neuT mice.

The longest follow-up reported then comparing cumulative revision rates with 2 different diameter femoral heads was up to 12 years and did not show any difference in CRR depended