Research Topics on Hydrogen Combustion:
Towards a better assessment of Hydrogen Safety
N. Chaumeix
Benevento, 21st of February 2012
1
ICARE – CNRS
Institut de Combustion, Aérothermique Réactivité et Environnement
1c, avenue de la Recherche Scientifique 45071 Orléans – Cedex 2 – France
Orléans Paris
ICARE is in Orléans, 125 km from Paris
Total staff : 110 35 Researchers
30 Engineers and technicians 30 PhD students and post-docs 15 Various trainees
Where is ICARE ?
Research domains of ICARE
Energy & Environment Propulsion & Space
• Combustion
• Chemical kinetics • Plasmas physics
• Fluid mechanics, turbulence • Two phase flows
• Supersonic, hypersonic flows • Ionized, rarefied flows
Application domains
• Aerospace propulsion
• Electric propulsion
• Liquid and solid propulsion
• Atmospheric reentry
• Atmospheric chemistry
• Energy production
• Alternative fuels, biofuels, hydrogen
• Pollutant emissions reductions
• Industrial risk prevention
Main cooperations
International co-operations: All EU countries, Russia, USA, Canada, China, Japon, Ukraine, Turkey, Argentine, etc
Research Areas @ ICARE
3 main research fields:
Combustion
• Chemical kinetics of reactive systems
• Dynamics of Combustion
Atmospheric Reactivity
Spatial Propulsion and Hypersonic Flows
8 different Groups of Research
Explosions and Chemical Reactions behind
Shock and Detonation Waves Group
Research Activities of the S. W. Group
Combustion Chemistry
Elementary Reaction Rates involving O and H atoms
Pollutant Formation from Gasoline Components
Reduced Mechanim of soot precursors from kerosene fuel
Soot Formation from fuels
• Diesel, Gasoline, kerosenes
Soot Oxidation
• In engine conditions behind shock waves
• Particles Filter
Research Activities of the S. W. Group
Flame and Explosions Dynamics
Hypergolic limits of propellant agents
Propellents for PDE
DDT using hot jet ignition
Laminar Flame properties and their instabilities
Flame acceleration in obstructed areas
Detonation criteria and industrial safety
Solid Explosives and their thermal aging
Accidental explosion in the industrial context
Gas leak/production Distribution in the area
Gas proportion in the mixture equivalent to the flammability range
Sufficient energy provided (e.g. hot surface)
Ignition and propagation
Introduction
Fukushima Daichii 10
Introduction
Prevention of Gas Explosion in a Nuclear Power Plant
Need a good assessment of combustion properties according to
• initial temperature and pressure
In the risk of explosion analysis
Good knowledge of Combustion Properties of the combustible mixture:
• the flammability limits
• ignition energy,
• flame velocity, burning rates,
• energy release,
• Auto-ignition delay times
• Detonation cell size
11
Hydrogen Hazard in Nuclear Power Plants ?
Destruction of the Nuclear Power Plant Building
Rejet des produits radioactifs dans l'environnement
12
Context
Mixtures involved in Pressurized Water Reactor
Hydrogen – air – water vapor
Lean
Unstable
Flame Acceleration Mechanism
A. F. : turbulence + instabilities
T.D.D. : shock focusing
Insight in the different mechanisms involved in flame acceleration
13
Model
Real
Identification of a Scenario
14
Flammability Limits
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Pourcentage molaire en Hydrocarbure 0
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
Pression (mm de Hg)
Ethane Propane Butane Pentane
Limites Inférieures Limites Supérieures
Minimum Ignition Energy
Combustion Regimes
Deflagration : Ignition wave, propagation via Heat &
Mass Transfer
17
Detonation : Coupling between a shock wave (|) and a reaction zone ()
Reaction zone
(burnt gas) (fresh gas)
Delay
(fresh gas) (burnt gas)
High P & T
État initial (gaz frais) Onde de combustion
État final (gaz brûlés)
Combustion regimes
Flame acceleration (turbulence, instabilities…)
DDT (shock focusing, local m explosion…)
Slow deflagration
Flame speed
18
Fast deflagration Detonation
LAMINAR PREMIXED FLAMES
Basic Properties
PART I – FLAMMABILITY LIMITS
20
Laser beam
Variable Attenuator Xenon Lamp
Beam trap
Pressure sensor
Mirror
Mirror
Screen
Photodiode 1 Photodiode
2
Photodiode 3 Knife
Fast video camera Spherical
Lens
Lens
Nd:YAG laser 1064 nm, 13 ns
10x telescope
Volume : 8L
4 Silica Windows
diameter= 250 mm
Experimental set-up: Flammability limits
21
E
max= 80 mJ
Laser Ignition
Schlieren System
Flammability limits: methodology
t= 0 s t= 12 ms t=24 ms t=36 ms t=48 ms
0 1 2
Temps (s) 1
2 3 4 5
Pression absolue (bar)
Manip L085 Pressure Laser PAICC
Case 1: Mixture is flammable
After ignition, the flame
propagates upwardly in the vessel
Pressure increases slightly in the vessel
22
Flammability limits: methodology
t= 0 s t= 2,2 ms t=4,7 ms t=12 ms t=20 ms
-0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Temps (s) 0.5
1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Pression absolue (bar)
Manip L087 Pressure Laser
Case 2: Mixture is not flammable
After ignition, a combustion products kernel is formed and fades away quickly
Pressure remains constant in the vessel
23
Results – Lean Mixtures
24
2 limits observed
Downward Propagation Limit
Full Propagation
Image 40 Image 80 Image 120
Image 160
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (s) 1
2 3 4
Absolute Pressure (bar) 0.09H
2 + 0.191O2 + 0.719N2 100 kPa ; 30°C
PAICC=3.93 bar
Image 10 Image 25 Image 35
Image 45
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Time (s)
1 1.2 1.4
Absolute Pressure (bar)
7% H2 + 19.5% O2 +73.5% N2
Results – Dry mixtures H
2/ Air – 1 bar
25
PART II - LAMINAR FLAME PROPERTIES
26
Flame Structure
T
igT, concentration (unités arbitraires)
x
T
réactifs produits
Intermédiaires réactionnels
Etat final (gaz brûlés)
Etat initial (gaz frais) T
r
cLaminar Flame Velocity
Definition : unburned gas flow-rate normal to the flame front surface
Implies that
Constant flowrate
Plane flame
Negligible thickness
In case of Outward Spherical Propagation
Pressure Signal
Flame Front Detection
28
Volume : 56 L
P
max= 50 Bars
T
max =470 K
Central Ignition
4 Silica Windows
diameter=550 mm
Schlieren System
High Speed Numerical Camera
VHT
Spark Electrodes
Oscilloscope HT
High Voltage Source
Spherical Bomb
Current Probe
To the Camera
I High voltage probe /1000
Experimental Setup: Laminar study
29
Spatial flame speed determination
Electrodes
Burned gases
Fresh gases
Flame front
30
Outward Spherical Flame Front Propagation
31
u
b b
u u
b b
b S b
L P
P T
T M
M dt
dP P
3 V r
S
Eschenbach & Agnew (1958) expression
• M : relative molar mass
• P, T : pressure and temperature
• r : flame radius
• : gas expansion ratio
s
L V
In the early stages of the flame propagation S
• t : time
• u : relative to unburned gas
• b : relative to burned gas
o
Spherical flame
o
Curvature and thickness negligible
o
Adiabatic process and isentropic compression
o
Chemical equilibrium behind the flame front
o
No dissociation or reactions in the fresh gas
o
Local deposit of the energy
Spatial flame speed determination
0 0.004 0.008 0.012 0.016
Time (s) 0
10 20 30 40 50
Radius (mm)
E.R. =1.05 E.R.=1.2 E.R.=0.85
s
L
S V
Pressure remains constant
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
Time (s) -2
0 2 4 6
Overpressure(bar)
G222 + Air - MANIP 187 Equivalence ratio = 1.05 and
Pini = 1 bar T= 363 K
-0.02 0 0.02 0.04
Time (s)
0 2 4
Overpressure (bar)
G222 + Air - MANIP 187 Equivalence ratio = 1.05 and
Pini = 1 bar T= 363 K Pressure
Observation Window
t= 0.00033s t= 0.0025 s t= 0.0035 s
t= 0.00616s t= 0.009 s t= 0.01183s
V
burned= 0.8 %V
total32
Unstretched velocity
f S
r 2 V
V L
V s s S L S L L
Finite flame thickness
A uniform & well-defined stretch
Visualisation of the flame propagation
o Laminar flame velocity versus stretch
o
Derive the laminar flame velocity at zero-stretch
33
Flame Stretch
Due to curvature :
Due to the strain ahead of te flame front:
Total Stretch rate :
u L
c
r
2 S
u g
S
r
2 u
u S s
c
r
2 V
u
g: velocity of the fresh gas ahead of the flame r
u: flame radius S
L: stretched laminar flame speed
V
S: stretched burning speed
Markstein Length, L et L’
Clavin and Joulain expression :
Burning Speed: V s V s 0 L .
Laminar Flame Speed:
S 0 L . S L L
S
L° : vitesse laminaire de flamme étirée
V
S° : vitesse spatiale de propagation de flamme étirée
: rapport d’expansion des gaz L, L’ : Longueurs de Markstein
L L
avec
S
L V
S
Methodology
Image 15
Image 25
Image 35
Image 45
Image 55
H
2/Air à Φ=3,491 T
ini=30,7°C ;
P
ini=100 kPa V
acq= 15 000 i/s
100 200 300 400 500 -300
-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
image 26
100 200 300 400 500 -300
-200 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500
0 0.001 0.002 0.003
Temps (s) 0
10 20 30 40
Rayon (mm)
R2 = 0.9998
36
Methodology
Equilibrium Calculations
Providing the thermodynamic properties of the species involved
• H
2, O
2, N
2, H
2O, H, O, OH, HO
2, H
2O
2, NO, NO
2, N
2O, …..
37
0 0.4 0.8
Time (s) 0
2 4 6 8
Absolute Pressure (bar)
0.333H2 + 0.14O2 + 0.527N2 100 kPa ; 30°C
At constant Pressure
• Adiabatic Flamme Temperature, T
ad At constant Volume
• Adiabatic Maximum Pressure, P
AICC Software COSILAB
Species in the detailed
chemical kinetic mechanism
ini AICC
ini exp
max,
P P
P P
Experimental Conditions
Mixture Composition
H2 / Air
Temperature domain
25 – 150 °C
Pressure Domain
1 – 2.5 bar
Low ignition Energy
0.4 to 40 mJ
38
Flame Propagation – H 2 + Air
Far from the limits – 1 bar- T
amb39
0 1 2 3 4 5
Rapport d'équivalence,
0 100 200 300 400
V it es se d e fl am m e la m in ai re /( cm /s ) H 2 /Air
Koroll et al Vagelopoulos Wu and Law Dowdy et alEgolfopoulos et al Lijima et Takeno Berman
Takahashi Aung et al Liu et al Raman Lamoureux cette étude
H 2 /Air
Koroll et al Vagelopoulos Wu and Law Dowdy et al
Egolfopoulos et al Lijima et Takeno Berman
Takahashi Aung et al Liu et al Raman Lamoureux cette étude
H 2 /Air
Koroll et al Vagelopoulos Wu and Law Dowdy et al
Egolfopoulos et al Lijima et Takeno Berman
Takahashi Aung et al Liu et al Raman Lamoureux cette étude
Markstein Length
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Rapport d'équivalence, F -1x10-3
-8x10-4 -4x10-4 0x100 4x10-4 8x10-4
Longueur de Markstein, L' (m)
Aung et al. (1997)
Davis and Searby (2002) Dowdy et al. (1990) ce travail
Prediction
Sun et al. (1999)
Combustion Parameters
0 1 2 3 4 5
Equivalence ratio,
1.0x10-5 1.0x10-4 1.0x10-3 1.0x10-2
Flame thickness, (m)
=D(H2,mixt.)/SL°
=/SL°
0 2 4 6
Equivalence ratio,
0 40 80 120 160 200
Overall activation energy, Ea (kJ.mol-1)
Sun et al. (1999) Dorofeev (2001) This Work
PART III - FLAME ACCELERATION
42
3.3 m ; V= 65L
internal= 0.154 m 1.68 m ; V= 685L
internal= 0.738 m Dome T ube
Experimental set-up: ENACCEF
43
3.3 m ; V= 65L
internal= 0.154 m 1.68 m ; V= 685L
internal= 0.738 m
Ignition
Electrical discharge between two electrodes
Obstacles
8, 11, 14 equidistant rings Blockage Ratio (BR)
of the rings BR = 0.6, 0.4, 0.33
(BR=1-(d/D)²) D
d
Dome T ube
Experimental set-up: ENACCEF
44
Equipment :
15 UV-Photomultipliers (PM)
flame detection and speed measurement
8 pressure sensors (Chimie-Metal and Kistler) pressure load measurement
9 sampling locations at different positions 6 locations in the tube
3 locations in the dome
Dome T ube
Experimental set-up: ENACCEF
45
Types of propagation – Full Propagation
-0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2
Time (s) 2
4 6
Pressure(bar)
G222_167 Pressure PAICC=6.3 Bar
2 regimes
If V
max/ (Cs)
BURNED< 0.5 then: slow flame propagation
If V
max/ (Cs)
BURNED≥ 0.5 then: Fast flame propagation
(Cs )BURNED : Speed of sound in the burned gases
Position %G222 initial
%G222 final
0.277 6.5 0
0.527 6.5 0
1.277 6.5 0
2.139 6.5 0
2.877 6.5 0
3.341 6.5 0
Tube Dome
0 1 2 3 4
Position (m) 0
100 200 300 400
Mean Velocity (m/s)
6.5% G222 / Air M167 BR=0.3, 8 Obstacles
46 0 1 2 3 4
Position (m) 0
200 400 600
Mean Velocity (m/s)
G222 / Air, BR=0.3, 8 Obstacles 6.5%
7.6%
0,5*CS,GB
Types of propagation - Partial propagation
Extinction
Post combustion chromatographic analyses report the initial mixture unburned outside the obstacle range
Turbulent mixing becomes much too important leading to extinction
(Cs )BURNED : Speed of sound in the burned gases
Position %G222 initial
%G222 final 0.277 6.8 1.6 0.527 6.8 4.1 1.277 6.8 5.8 2.139 6.8 6.8 2.877 6.8 6.8 3.341 6.8 6.8
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
Time (s) 0
2 4 6 8
Pressure (bar)
Pressure M220
PAICC=6.97 bar Tube Dome
0,5*CS,GB
0 1 2 3 4
Position (m) 0
100 200 300 400
Mean Velocity (m/s)
6.8% G222 / Air 8 Obstacles, BR=0.6
M220 Extinction
47
H2 - Air
48
0 1 2 3 4
distance from electrodes (m) 0
200 400 600
Flame speed (m/s)
13 % Uniform - BR=0,63 (Averaged) 10.5 % Uniform - BR=0,63 (Averaged)
0 1 2 3 4
distance from electrodes (m) 0
10 20 30 40 50
Flame speed (m/s)
13 % Uniform - Smooth tube (Averaged) 10.5 % Uniform - Smooth tube (Averaged)
Acceleration Criterion
49
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4
(Le-1)
3.4 3.6 3.8 4 4.2 4.4
(0,130;0,00;3,76)
(0,130;0,20;3,76)
(0,130;0,30;3,76)
(0,130;0,40;3,76)
(0,110;0,00;3,76)
(0,105;0,00;3,76) (0,105;0,10;3,76)
Ea(kJ.mol-1) = 224,14 -156,00 F + 47,15 F2 - 4,16 F3 Flammes rapides
Flammes lentes Flammes coincées
(0,116;0,00;3,50) (0,122;0,00;3,25)
(0,128;0,00;3,00)
(0,119;0,07;3,00) (0,115;0,10;3,00)
(0,115;0,00;3,76)
= 0.09 (Le-1) + 4.5
PART IV - DETONATION
50
Detonation : Coupling between a shock wave (|) and a reaction zone ()
Delay
(fresh gas) (burnt gas)
High P & T
Figure 1 : Structure ZND de la détonation
51
Detonation
Cellular detonation wave structure
In Case of Self-sustained Detonation
52
53
{H
2/CH
4/O
2} mixture :
CH
4/CH
4+H
2= 0.4, F =0.75; P1 = 10 kPa; T1 = 20°C
Velocity : D
C.J= 1800 m.s
-1(D
exp= 2218 14 m.s
-1)
Von Neumann parameters:
T
2N= 1380 K and P
2N=250 kPa
Triple
points
Leading shock
Reaction zone
:
induction distance : ignition delay time behind the leading shock
CORRELATION BETWEEN AND
λ = k* i
IMPORTANCE of the cell size
Critical Energy of Initiation
3 2
0
3
CJ i CJ
c A P B D
E B 425
Minimum tube diameter d
Transmission from a tube open space d c 13
Minimum tube diameter with obstacles d
Run-up distance 40
TDD
L
54
IMPORTANCE of the cell size
55
Sensitivity to detonation
0.1 1 10 100 1000
Initial Pressure P
1(kPa) 0.1
1 10 100
C el l w id th ( m m )
C2H2/O2F=2.5
C2H2/O2F=1.0
C2H2/O2 F=0.6 CH4/O2F=1.0
H2/O2 F=1.0 C2H4/O2 F=1.0
C3H8/O2F=1.0
C2H6/O2F=1.0 C7H16/O2F=1.0
Relation between and i
56
2
2 1 2 1
1 2
avec . .
i i CJ
CJ
CJ
i i
D v
v u u D u
D
λ = k* i
Chemistry
Thermodynamics
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
CH4/{CH4+H2}
0 20 40 60 80
Largeur de cellule (mm)
: F=0,75 - P1=10 kPa
: F=1 - P1=10 kPa
: F=1 - P1=20 kPa
= (D
CJ- u)
0.0x100 2.0x10-4 4.0x10-4 6.0x10-4
Temps (µs)
Unités arbitraires
xCH4/(xCH4+xH2) = 0.4 ; F = 0.4 P5 = 924 kPa ; T5 = 1620 K Délai d'auto-inflammation
infl. = 70,5 µs Onde de choc réfléchieOnde de choc incidente
Signal d'émission OH
Signal de pression
Detonation
Acquisition of Database –
Fundamental Properties
57
CONCLUSION
58