• Non ci sono risultati.

Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome"

Copied!
9
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) is a chromosome 4p deletion syndrome, first described by Cooper and Hirschhorn in 1961, followed by report of Wolf et al. in 1965. The incidence is estimated to be approximately 1 in 50,000 births.

GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS

1. Caused by the deletion of the distal short arm of chromo- some 4

a. Variable size of the deletion

b. Deletion of the terminal band (4p16.3): essential for full expression of the phenotype

c. Identification of a 165 kb minimal critical region (WHSCR) within 4p16.3

d. Mechanism of deletions

i. De novo deletions (75%): interstitial deletion of preferential paternal origin in 85–90%

ii. Deletions resulting from unusual cytogenetic abnormality (12%) such as ring chromosome 4 iii. Deletions resulting from unbalanced product of a

parental chromosomal rearrangement, usually of a reciprocal translocation (10–15%)

2. Types of chromosome abnormalities

a. Detectable by conventional cytogenetic technique:

large deletions

b. Detectable only by molecular methods i. Terminal microdeletions

ii. Interstitial microdeletions iii. Cryptic translocations 3. Genotype-phenotype correlation

a. Patients with a large 4p16.3 deletion i. Severe mental and growth retardation ii. Major malformations

iii. Seizures

iv. Characteristic facial appearance with wide fore- head, large and protruding eyes, hypertelorism, prominent glabella, down-turned mouth, and micrognathia

b. Patients with a 4p16.3 microdeletion i. Milder phenotype

ii. Lack congenital malformations

c. Using genotype-phenotype correlation analysis in eight informative patients, Zollino (2003) character- ized the following distinctive WHS clinical signs that represent the minimal diagnostic criteria for this con- dition, and mapped this basic phenotype outside the currently defined WHSCR and designated as a new critical region, WHSCR-2.

i. Presence of typical facial appearance ii. Mental retardation

iii. Growth delay iv. Congenital hypotonia

v. Seizures

4. LETM1

a. A gene deleted in WHS, encodes mitochondrial pro- tein

b. Current evidence suggests that at least some (neuro- muscular) features of WHS may be caused by mito- chondrial dysfunction.

CLINICAL FEATURES

1. Maternal gestational history a. Intrauterine growth retardation b. Decreased fetal movements c. Small placenta

2. Developmental history

a. Delayed psychomotor development

b. Difficulty in ambulation, often with ataxic gait c. Seizures (50% of cases)

3. Behavior history a. Stereotypes

i. Holding the hands in front of the face ii. Hand-washing or flapping

iii. Patting self on chest iv. Rocking

v. Head shaking vi. Stretching of legs b. Absence of speech

c. Babbling or guttural sounds, occasionally modulated in a communicative way

d. Comprehension limited to simple orders or to a specific context

e. Affect disorder that improves over time f. Walking with or without support g. Self-feeding

h. Helps in dressing and undressing self

i. Improved abilities and adaptation to new situations j. Communicative abilities and verbal comprehension

with extension of the gesture repertoire and decreased occurrence of withdrawal and anxiety behaviors 4. Growth: severe growth retardation (short stature) 5. CNS

a. Profound mental retardation b. Microcephaly

c. Seizures (50–100%)

d. Congenital hypotonia with muscle hypotrophy partic- ularly of the lower limbs

e. Malformation (33%)

i. Hypoplasia of cerebellum

ii. Cavum or absent septum pellucidum iii. Agenesis of corpus callosum

iv. Hypoplasia or absence of olfactory bulbs and tracts v. Microgyria

vi. Migration defects vii. Hydrocephalus 1047

(2)

6. Skull

a. Frontal bossing b. High frontal hairline

c. Hemangioma over forehead or glabella

d. Scalp defect with or without underlying bony defect 7. Face: characteristic dysmorphic features collectively

described as “Greek warrior helmet” facies (prominent glabella, hypertelorism, broad beaked nose, and frontal bossing)

8. Eyes

a. Hypertelorism

b. Down-slanting palpebral fissures c. Epicanthal folds

d. Strabismus e. Coloboma

f. Proptosis due to hypoplasia of orbital ridges g. Ectopic pupils

h. Esotropia i. Ptosis

j. Microphthalmia k. Megalocornea

l. Sclerocornea m. Cataracts

n. Hypoplastic anterior chamber and ciliary body of iris o. Persistence of lenticular membrane

p. Hypoplastic retina with formation of rosettes q. Cup-shaped optic discs

r. Congenital nystagmus s. Early onset glaucoma

t. Rieger anomaly 9. Nose

a. Broad or beaked nose

b. Nasolacrimal duct stenosis or atresia 10. Mouth

a. Short upper lip b. Short philtrum c. Cleft lip or palate d. Bifid uvula e. Carplike mouth

f. Micrognathia g. Retrognathia 11. Ears

a. Low-set ears

b. Large, floppy, or misshapen ears c. Microtia

d. Preauricular dimples

e. Chronic otitis media with effusion f. Sensorineural hearing loss 12. Cardiovascular

a. Atrial septal defect b. Ventricular septal defect

c. Persistent left superior vena cava d. Valve abnormalities

e. Complex cardiac defects 13. Pulmonary

a. Bilateral bilobed or trilobed lungs

b. Lung hypoplasia secondary to diaphragmatic hernia 14. GI anomalies

a. Diastasis recti

b. Umbilical or inguinal hernias

c. Accessory spleens d. Absent gallbladder e. Diaphragmatic hernia

f. Intestinal malrotation 15. Genitourinary anomalies (25%)

a. Hypoplastic kidneys b. Cystic dysplastic kidneys c. Unilateral renal agenesis d. Hydronephrosis

e. Exstrophy of the bladder f. Hypoplastic external genitalia

g. Cryptorchidism and hypospadias in males

h. Hypoplastic müllerian derivatives (i.e., agenesis of vagina, cervix or uterus; hypoplastic uterus; ovarian streaks) in females

16. Skeletal anomalies (60–70%)

a. Long slender fingers with additional flexion creases b. Long narrow chest

c. Hypoplastic widely spaced nipples

d. Hypoplasia or duplication of thumbs and great toes e. Talipes equinovarus

f. Hypoplasia of pubic bones g. Vertebral and rib anomalies h. Defective calvarium ossification

i. Scoliosis j. Kyphosis k. Osteoporosis

l. Delayed bone maturation m. Sacral dimple

17. Infection-prone, immunodeficiency 18. Malignant hematological disorders

a. Myelodysplastic syndrome b. Leukemia

19. Dermatoglyphics

a. Hypoplastic dermal ridges b. Transverse palmar creases (25%) c. Excess of digital arches

d. t or t’

20. Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome (PRDS) a. Phenotypic overlap with WHS

i. Prenatal and postnatal growth retardation ii. Microcephaly

iii. Seizures

iv. Developmental delay v. Facial features

a) A wide mouth b) Short upper lip c) Flat philtrum d) Beaked nose e) Prominent eyes

f) Maxillary hypoplasia

b. Microdeletion of 4p16.3 detected in most cases c. Current evidence suggests that PRDS is not a separate

clinical entity but may represent the milder end of the WHS spectrum.

21. Fetal phenotype a. Major anomalies

i. Intrauterine growth retardation ii. Microcephaly

iii. Cleft palate

(3)

iv. Corpus callosum agenesis v. Ventricular septal defect vi. Diaphragmatic hernia vii. Renal hypoplasia b. Minor anomalies

i. Scalp defect

ii. Hypertelorism usually with a prominent glabella iii. Pulmonary isomerism

iv. Common mesentery v. Hypospadias vi. Sacral dimple 22. Prognosis

a. Crude infant mortality rate: 17%

b. Mortality rate in the first two years: 21%

c. Cases with large de novo deletions are more likely to die than those with smaller deletions.

d. Causes of death i. Birth anoxia

ii. Withdrawal of treatment after premature delivery iii. Lower respiratory tract infections

iv. Sudden unexplained death

v. Congenital anomalies, such as congenital heart disease, dysplastic kidneys, renal hypoplasia, diaphragmatic hernia, and pulmonary hypoplasia

DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS

1. Conventional cytogenetic studies: most common method to detect chromosome arm 4p deletions (60–70% of deletions)

2. High resolution cytogenetic studies: to detect smaller deletions of chromosome band 4p16.3

3. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using Wolf- Hirschhorn critical region probe: detecting >95% of dele- tions. Molecular cytogenetic studies using FISH allow the diagnosis to be made in patients with very small deletions or cryptic translocations. FISH uses genetic markers that have been precisely localized to the area of interest. The absence of signal from either the maternal or the paternal allele for the marker is indicative of monosomy for that chromosomal region.

4. Immune workup

a. Common variable immunodeficiency

b. Immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G2 (IgG2) subclass deficiency

c. IgA deficiency

d. Impaired polysaccharide responsiveness e. Normal T-cell immunity

5. Radiography

a. Delayed bone maturation b. Microcephaly

c. Hypertelorism d. Micrognathia

e. Anterior fusion of vertebrae f. Fused ribs

g. Dislocated hips

h. Proximal radioulnar synostosis i. Clubfeet

6. Echocardiography to detect heart defects 7. Renal ultrasound to detect renal anomalies

8. MRI and CT scans to demonstrate underlying brain pathology including agenesis of corpus callosum and ventriculomegaly

9. EEG for seizure monitoring

10. Swallowing study for feeding difficulty

11. Comprehensive audiologic and otologic evaluation to rule out possible hearing impairment

12. Ophthalmologic examination 13. Developmental testing

a. Speech and motor evaluation b. Appropriate psychometric evaluation

GENETIC COUNSELING

1. Recurrence risk a. Patient’s sib

i. De novo deletion cases: no significant increased risk

ii. Deletion resulting from a parental chromosomal rearrangement: increased risk for unbalanced product in offspring

b. Patient’s offspring: reproduction unlikely due to men- tal retardation

2. Prenatal diagnosis available to families in which one par- ent is known to be a carrier of a chromosome rearrange- ment by amniocentesis, CVS, or PUBS

a. Ultrasonography to detect in utero manifestation of distinct phenotype

i. Severe intrauterine growth retardation ii. Microcephaly

iii. Hypertelorism, usually with prominent glabella iv. Micrognathia

v. Cleft lip and palate vi. Diaphragmatic hernia b. Chromosome analysis

i. Conventional karyotyping ii. FISH

iii. Whole chromosome painting 3. Management

a. Multidisciplinary team approach

i. Early intervention program to improve motor development, cognition, communication, and social skills

ii. Speech, physical, and occupational therapies iii. Appropriate school placement

b. Manage feeding difficulties and failure to thrive i. Gavage feeding

ii. Gastrostomy

iii. Occasional gastroesophageal fundoplication c. Anticonvulsants for seizure control

d. Orthopedic care for skeletal abnormalities i. Clubfoot

ii. Scoliosis iii. Kyphosis

e. Care for possible immunodeficiency

REFERENCES

Altherr MR, Wright TJ, Denison K, et al.: Delimiting the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome critical region to 750 kilobase pairs. Am J Med Genet 71:

47–53, 1997.

(4)

Battaglia A, Carey JC: Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome and Pitt-Rogers-Danks syn- drome. Am J Med Genet 75:541, 1998.

Battaglia A, Carey JC: Health supervision and anticipatory guidance of individ- uals with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet (Semin Med Genet) 89:111–115, 1999.

Battaglia A, Carey JC: Update on the clinical features and natural history of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS): experience with 48 cases. Am J Hum Genet 67(Suppl 2):127, 2000.

Battaglia A, Carey JC, Cederholm P, et al.: Natural history of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: experience with 15 cases. Pediatrics 103:830–836, 1999.

Battaglia A, Carey JC, Wright TJ: Wolf-Hirschhorn (4p-) syndrome. Adv Pediatr 48:75–113, 2001.

Chen H: Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. EMed J 2(3):March 27, 2003.

Clemens M, Martsolf JT, Rogers JG, et al.: Pitt-Rogers-Danks syndrome: the result of a 4p microdeletion. Am J Med Genet 66:95–100, 1996.

Dallapiccola B, Mandich P, Bellone E, et al.: Parental origin of chromosome 4p deletion in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47:921–924, 1993.

Dietze I, Fritz B, Huhle D, et al.: Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular investi- gation in a fetus with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome with paternally derived 4p deletion. Case report and review of the literature. Fetal Diagn Ther 19:251–260, 2004.

Dufke A, Seidel J, Schoning M, et al.: Microdeletion 4p16.3 in three unrelated patients with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Cytogenet Cell Genet 91:81–84, 2000.

Estabrooks LL, Breg WR, Hayden MR, et al.: Summary of the 1993 ASHG ancillary meeting “recent research on chromosome 4p syndromes and genes.” Am J Med Genet 55:453–458, 1995.

Fang YY, Bain S, Haan EA, et al.: High resolution characterization of an inter- stitial deletion of less than 1.9 Mb at 4p16.3 associated with Wolf- Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet 71:453–457, 1997.

Fryns J Pediatr, Smeets E, Devriendt K, et al.: Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome with cryptic 4p16.3 deletion and balanced/unbalanced mosaicism in the mother.

Ann Génét 41:73–76, 1998.

Hanley-Lopez J, Estabrooks LL, Stiehm R: Antibody deficiency in Wolf- Hirschhorn syndrome. J Pediatr 133:141–143, 1998.

Hirschhorn K, Cooper HL, Firschein IL: Deletion of short arms of chromo- some 4–5 in a child with defects of midline fusion. Humangenetik 1:479–482, 1965.

Johnson VP, Mulder RD, Hosen R: The Wolf-Hirschhorn (4p-) syndrome. Clin Genet 10:104–112, 1976.

Lazjuk GI, Lurie IW, Ostrowskaja TI, et al.: The Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

II. Pathologic anatomy. Clin Genet 18:6–12, 1980.

Lesperance MM, Grundfast KM, Rosenbaum KN: Otologic manifestations of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124:193–196, 1998.

Lurie IW, Lazjuk GI, Ussova YI, et al.: The Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. I.

Genetics. Clin Genet 17:375–384, 1980.

Ogle R, Sillence DO, Merrick A, et al.: The Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome in adult- hood: evaluation of a 24-yr-old man with a rec(4) chromosome. Am J Med Genet 65:124–127, 1996.

Opitz JM: Twenty-seven-years follow-up in the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome [editorial]. Am J Med Genet 55:459–461, 1995.

Pitt DB, Rogers JG, Danks DM: Mental retardation, unusual face, and intrauter- ine growth retardation: a new recessive syndrome? Am J Med Genet 19:307–313, 1984.

Rauch A, Schellmoser S, Kraus C, et al.: First known microdeletion within the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome critical region refines genotype-phenotype correlation. Am J Med Genet 99:338–342, 2001.

Roulston D, Altherr M, Wasmuth JJ, et al.: Confirmation of a suspected dele- tion 4p16 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with a cosmid probe. Am J Hum Genet 49:274, 1991.

Schlickum S, Moghekar A, Simpson JC, et al.: LETM1, a gene deleted in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome, encodes an evolutionarily conserved mito- chondrial protein. Genomics 83:254–261, 2004.

Shannon NL, Maltby FL, Rigby AS, et al.: An epidemiological study of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome: life expectancy and cause of mortality. J Med Genet 38:674–679, 2001.

Sharathkumar A, Kirby M, Freedman M, et al.: Malignant hematological dis- orders in children with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Am J Med Genet 119A:194–199, 2003.

Tachdjian G, Fondacci C, Tapia S, et al.: The Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome in fetuses. Clin Genet 42: 281–287, 1992.

Thomson P: Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome. Review of the literature and three case studies. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 88:192–197, 1998.

Wieczorek D, Krause M, Majewski F, et al.: Effect of the size of the deletion and clinical manifestation in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome analysis of 13 patients with a de novo deletion. Eur J Hum Genet 8:519–526, 2000.

Wilson MG, Towner JW, Coffin GS, et al.: Genetic and clinical studies in 13 patients with the Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome [del(4p)]. Hum Genet 59:297–307, 1981.

Wolf U, Reinwein H, Porsch R, et al.: Deficiency on the short arms of a chro- mosome No. 4. Humangenetik 1:397–413, 1965.

Wright TJ, Ricke DO, Denison K, et al.: A transcript map of the newly defined 165 kb Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome critical region. Hum Mol Genet 6:317–324, 1997.

Wright TJ, Clemens M, Quarrell O, et al.: Wolf-Hirschhorn and Pitt-Rogers- Danks syndromes caused by overlapping 4p deletions. Am J Med Genet 75:345–350, 1998.

Zollino M, Di Stefano C, Zampino G, et al.: Genotype-phenotype correlations and clinical diagnostic criteria in Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome . Am J Med Genet 94:254–261, 2000.

Zollino M, Lecce R, Fischetto R, et al.: Mapping the Wolf-Hirschhorn syn- drome phenotype outside the currently accepted WHS critical region and defining a new critical region, WHSCR-2. Am J Hum Genet 72:590–597, 2003.

(5)

Fig. 1. A patient with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome at different ages showing characteristic facial features consisting of prominent glabel- la, hypertelorism, beaked nose, and frontal bossing, collectively described as “Greek warrior helmet” facies.

(6)

Fig. 2. A girl with WHS showing characteristic face and deletion of WHS locus (FISH).

(7)

Fig. 3. Two children with WHS showing characteristic facial features of the syndrome.

(8)

Fig. 5. Karyotype of the sister showing deletion of 4p, derived from the mother with balanced translocation (4p;8p) (partial karyotypes).

Fig. 4. Two siblings with WHS showing characteristic features of the syndrome.

(9)

Fig. 7. A fetus with WHS showing broad triangular-shaped nasal root and the flat facial profile resembling “Greek warrior helmet.” The radiographs show hypoplasia of the cervical vertebral bodies.

Fig. 6. Karyotype and FISH of another patient with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Spinach leaf juice from plants under normoxia, hypoxia, and re-oxygenated state has been tested on HT29 human colon cancer cells in order to evaluate the possible

a Relative expression levels of miR-1-3p transcript in embryos 10 h and 20 h after injection of the miR-1-3p antagomir, (b) relative expression levels of Bdtra transcript in embryos

This study was aimed at examining possible changes in the resting motor threshold (rMT) and in the corticospinal response in karate athletes, and at determining whether athletes

1. Behcet’s syndrome and thrombosis. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. Erkan F, Gul A, Tasali E. Pulmonary manifes- tations of Behcet’s disease. Pathologic review of cystic and

Here, we report the case of a young female with fulminant vasculitis and Rhupus syn- drome; this is first example of such a dis- ease overlap.. n

Strictures longer than 2 cm, those associated with radiation or ischemic injury, and some in a middle ureteral location may be managed more appropriately by open reconstruction

In this section, we will outline important information that the medical history will elicit concern- ing the features of PCOS, including the presenting complaint, the onset