• Non ci sono risultati.

The Dark Side of Divestiture: An Analysis of Principal-Principal Conflicts in Western EuropeanCountries

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "The Dark Side of Divestiture: An Analysis of Principal-Principal Conflicts in Western EuropeanCountries"

Copied!
8
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

The Dark Side of Divestiture:

An Analysis of Principal-Principal Conflicts in Western European Countries

Enzo Peruffo*

Department of Business and Management LUISS Guido Carli

Viale Romania, 32 00198 Roma E-mail: eperuffo@luiss.it Office: +39 06 85 225 435

Raffaele Oriani

Department of Business and Management LUISS Guido Carli

Viale Romania, 32 00198 Roma E-mail: roriani@luiss.it Office: +39 06 85 225 908

Timothy B Folta University of Connecticut

University of Strasbourg Institute for Advanced Study, BETA E-mail: tfolta@business.uconn.edu

Office: (860) 486-3734

* Corresponding Author

We thank Laurence Capron and Maria Goranova for their careful and critical reading of earlier versions of the paper.

(2)

Abstract

This paper examines how shares held by dominant owner affect abnormal returns around divestitures in the Western European Countries (Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the U.K.). We hypothesize that in institutional contexts where minority shareholder protection is weaker, divestitures are more likely to be attempts by dominant owners to expropriate rents from minority shareholders. The emphasis on the agency relationship between dominant and minority shareholders complements a growing stream of literature recognizing that closely-held firms dominate the landscape in many countries. A unique dataset of 265 divestitures across thirteen countries is used to test the hypotheses. The evidence suggests that the effects of shares held by dominant owner differs markedly across institutional contexts with different minority shareholder rights protection.

(3)

REFERENCES

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions.

Newbury Park: SAGE.

Amihud, Y., & Lev, B. (1981). Risk reduction as a managerial motive for conglomerate mergers.

Bell Journal of Economics, 163, 51-59.

Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K. M., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the Family Firm: The Role of Families in Succession Decisions and Performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122, 647-691.

Bergh, D. D., Johnson, R. A., & Dewitt, R. L. (2007). Restructuring through spin-off or sell-off:

transforming information asymmetries into financial gain. Strategic Management Journal, 29, 133-148.

Bergh, D. D., & Lim, E. (2008). Learning how to restructure: Absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance, Strategic Management Journal, 29, 593-616.

Bergh, D. D. (1995). Size and relatedness of unit sold: an agency theory and resource-based perspective, Strategic Management Journal, 16, 221-239.

Bertrand. M., Mehta, P., & Mullainathan, S. (2002). Ferreting out tunneling: An application to Indian business groups, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 121-148.

Bethel, J. E., & Liebeskind, J. (1993). The effects of ownership structure on corporate restructuring.

Strategic Management Journal, 14, 15-31.

Brauer, M. (2006). What have we acquired and what should we acquire in divestiture research? A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 32, 751–785.

Brauer, M., & Wiersema, M. (2012). Industry divestiture waves: how a firm’s position influences investor returns, Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1472-1492.

(4)

Bruton, G. D., Filatotchev, I., Chahine, S., Wright, M. (2010). Governance, Ownership structure, and performance of IPO firms: the impact of different types of private equity investors and institutional environments. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 491-509.

Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family Firms. The Journal of Finance, 58, 2167–

2201.

Capron, L., Mitchell, W. & Swaminathan, A. (2001). Asset divestiture following horizontal acquisitions: a dynamic view. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 33-54.

Casson, M. (1999). The Economics of Family Firm. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 47, 10-23.

Chen, Y. Y., & Young, M. N. (2010). Cross-border mergers and acquisitions by Chinese listed companies: A principal-principal perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27, 523- 539.

Chung, C. N., & Luo, X. (2008). Institutional logics or agency costs: The influence of corporate governance models on business group restructuring in emerging economies. Organization Science, 19, 766-784.

Conac, P. H., Enriques, L. & Gelter, M. (2007). Constraining Dominant Shareholders. Self-Dealing:

The Legal Framework in France, Germany and Italy. ECFR, 4.

Connelly, B. L., Hoskisson, R. E., Tihanyi, L. & Certo, S. T. (2010). Ownership as form of corporate governance. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 561-589.

Dalziel, T., White, R. E., & Arthurs, J. D. (2011). Principal costs in initial public offerings. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1346-1364.

Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Corporate Diversification. The Journal of Finance, 52, 135-160.

Dharwadkar, R., George, G., & Brandes, P. (2000). Privatization in emerging economies: an agency theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 25, 650–69.

(5)

Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008). The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics, 88, 430-465.

Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2004). Private benefits of control: an international comparison’, Journal of Finance. 59, 537–600.

Ehrhardt, O. & Nowak, E. (2003). The Effect of IPOs on German Family–Owned Firms:

Governance Changes, Ownership Structure, and Performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 41, 222–232.

Faccio, M. & Lang, L. (2002). The ultimate ownership of western European corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 365-395.

Fama, E., Fisher, L., Jensen, M., & Roll, R. (1969). The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review, 10, 1-12.

Feldman, E. R., Amit, R., & Villalonga, B. (2016). Corporate divestitures and family control.

Strategic Management Journal, 37, 429-446.

Hanson, R. C., & Song, M. H. (2000). Managerial ownership, board structure, and the division of gains in divestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 6, 55-70.

Hoskisson, R., & Turk, T.A. (1990). Corporate restructuring: Governance and control limits of the internal capital market. Academy of Management Review, 15, 459-477.

Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: the effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies, The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 697-716.

Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A. & Moesel, D. D. (1994). Corporate divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: Effects of governance, strategy and performance, The Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1207-1251.

(6)

Jara-Bertin, M., Lòpez-Iturriaga, F. J., & Lòpez-de-Foronda, O. L. (2008). The contest to the control in European family firms: how other shareholders affect firm value, Corporate governance: an international review, 16, 146-159.

Jensen, M. C. (1986). The agency costs of free cash flow: Corporate finance and takeovers, American Economic Review, 76, 323-329.

Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Association, 90, 22-27.

Kolev, K. D. (2016). To Divest or not to Divest: a meta-analysis of the antecedents of corporate divestitures. British Journal of Management, 27, 179-196.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997). Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance, 52, 1131–1150.

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.

La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance, 54, 471-516.

Lang, L., Poulsen, A., & Stulz, R. (1995). Asset sales, firm performance, and the agency costs of managerial discretion, Journal of Financial Economics, 37, 3–38.

Lee, D., & Madhavan, R. (2010). Divestiture and firm performance: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Management, 36, 1345-1371.

Li, J., & Qian, C. (2013). Principal-principal conflicts under weak institutions: A study of corporate takeovers in China, Strategic Management Journal, 34, 498-508.

Markides, C. C. (1992). Consequences of corporate refocusing: ex ante evidence, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 398–412.

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (1997). Event studies in management research: theoretical and empirical issues, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 626-657.

(7)

Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited Control and Firm Performance, American Economic Review, 96, 1559-1588.

Peruffo, E., Marchegiani, L., Vicentini, F. (2018). Experience as a source of knowledge in divestiture decisions: emerging issues and knowledge management implications, Journal of Knowledge Management, 22, 344-361.

Peruffo, E., Bergh, D., Hitt, M., Connelly B., Chiu, K. (2018). Market Response to Divestiture Announcements: A Screening Theory Perspective, 2018 Meeting of the Southern Management Association, Lexington (6-10 November)

Peruffo, E., Perri, A., Pirolo, L. (2017). La creazione di valore nelle strategie di disinvestimento:

evidenze dal contesto europeo, Sinergie Italian Journal of Management, 34, 385-408

Peruffo, E., Oriani, R., Perri., A. (2014). Information Asymmetries, family ownership and divestiture financial performance: evidence from western European countries, Corporate Ownership & Control, 11,4, 43-57.

Shimizu, K., & Hitt, M. (2005). What constraints of facilitates divestitures of formerly acquired firms? The effects of organizational inertia. Journal of Management, 31, 50-72.

Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 461-488.

Stulz, R. M. (1988). Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 25-34.

Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80, 385–417.

Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2009). How are U.S. family firms controlled? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 3047–3091.

Wan, W. P., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2003). Home country environments, corporate diversification strategies, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 27-45.

(8)

Wiseman, R. M., Chevas-Rodrìguez, G., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2012). Towards a Social Theory of Agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49, 202-222

Young, M. N., Peng, M. W., Ahlstrom, D., Bruton, G. D., Jiang, Y. (2008). Corporate governance in emerging economies: a review of the principal-principal perspective, Journal of Management Studies, 45, 196-220

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

The model of communication ethnography based on dialogue and supported by communication artifacts allow designers to practice qualitative observatories of collaborative

Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus 91 National Scientific and Educational Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk,

It can be postulated that although the velocity of the particles in both Al7075 and Pure Al coating is the same and even Al7075 is harder than Pure Al, higher temperature in Pure

- Compared to fertilized control, shavings increased N concentration of leaves and grain only at the higher rate (by 24% and by 35%), while S15 and all the other amendments did

L’indicazione consules attribuita a tale collegio di per sé non implica poi l’esistenza di un comune istituzional- mente formato: è infatti ormai opinione diffusa che

[…] in thinking of the mechanisms of power, I am thinking rather of its capillary forms of existence, the point where power reaches into the very grain of individuals, touches

TPF is the proportion of outstanding equity owned by all identified pension funds; IPF is the ratio of occupational pension funds holdings over their total assets; LNPFA is the log

Daily PM2.5 samples were collected during heating and non-heating season of the year 2013 in three different locations in Poland: Szczecin (urban background), Trzebinia