• Non ci sono risultati.

1a of the Koloph

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "1a of the Koloph"

Copied!
1
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Abstract

This work is a critical edition with translation and commentary of three Aristotle’s Politeiai fragments (Kyme Aiolike, Colophon, Samos) preserved by the indirect tradition, of which it suggests a hypothetical reconstitution and a new numeration of the corpus.

The existence of these three Politeiai is documented by the explicit attestation of their titles in the transmitting sources (frgs. 4a, 5 and 7 of the Sam. Pol.; frg. 1a of the Koloph. Pol. and frg. 4a of the Kym. Pol.); furthermore both from the Kymaion Politeia and the Samion Politeia we have also got

Heraklides Lembos’ excerpta, studied in this work in order to constitute the corpus — as a supporting element to recognize and enumerate the fragments — and to achieve an overall comprehension of the examined passages from the Politeiai.

Compared with the existing editions, this work stands out for its attempt to satisfy a twofold objective: on the one side to revise the critical text of the fragments, to provide an italian translation  not yet existing  and to write a systematic commentary; on the other side, to study the fragments in an up-to-date methodological perspective, which puts in the foreground the study of the context of transmission and the kind of the transmitting source.

The three corpora include sixteen fragments, some of which of uncertain attribution: ten fragments of the Samion Politeia, one of which not included in Rose and Gigon editions (frg. 3); two fragments of the Kolophonion Politeia, one of which not included in Rose and Gigon editions and here classified as uncertain (frg. 2?); four fragments of the Kymaion Politeia, two of which not included in Rose and Gigon editions and here classified as uncertain (frg. 2? e frg. 3?).

In the commentary all philological, historical and historiographical problems related to the examined fragments are discussed: criteria of attribution, delimitation and numeration of the fragments; topic, historical meaning and historiographical perspective of each text; the way Aristotle approaches his sources, selects and refers information, with special focus on the different manner he deals with the same topics in Politeiai and Politics.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Finer milling of the feed material does not lead to a significant increase of the zinc recovery, while reduction of zinc content in the froth product is observed, which

To this aim the variation of the first modal frequency during the whole test sequence was studied to investigate the sensitivity of this parameter to both the cracking of the

The main tool available to national authorities to recognize the occupational origin of a disease are the lists, but aims, contents, structure and size of the lists

Interestingly, we found that nanodexa inhibited Jurkat cell adhesion to HUVEC and COX-2 expression with earlier effects and at lower doses than free dexamethasone..

Conclusions: Our results indicate that: good cooperation between doctors is crucial for successful recruitment; the majority of families invited to the TRIGR have agreed

The technical solution is the unique convergent anastomosis of the basi- lar trunk, which guarantees permanent blood flow to the brain stem, where the vital command centres of

The work was carried out by several scientific referents: Chiara Gizzi (critical edition of the vulgate text), Franca Ela Consolino (critical edition of the Latin text),

Nel 1942 era uscita l’edizione critica del De prospectiva pingendi di Giusta Nicco Fasola [Piero della Francesca 1942], lavoro certamente importante ma che non teneva conto