• Non ci sono risultati.

Prune Belly Syndrome

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Condividi "Prune Belly Syndrome"

Copied!
5
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

In 1895, Parker described the congenital triad of deficient abdominal musculature, cryptorchidism, and urinary tract abnormalities. Subsequently, the term “prune-belly syndrome”

was coined for this condition based on the characteristic wrin- kled appearance of the abdomen. The incidence of the syn- drome is estimated to be 1 in 35,000 to 1 in 50,000 live births.

GENETICS/BASIC DEFECTS

1. Etiologies

a. Questionable genetic inheritance

i. Questionable autosomal dominant inheritance ii. Autosomal recessive inheritance suggested by

some authors

b. Fetal abdominal distension caused by urinary tract obstruction

i. The most common cause of prune-belly syndrome ii. Urethral obstruction causing dilatation of the fetal bladder and upper tracts thereby attenuating the abdominal musculature

iii. Spontaneous relief of the urethral obstruction in some cases prenatally decompresses the abdomen producing the shriveled, prune-like appearance of the baby’s abdomen

iv. Persistent urethral obstruction causing huge distention of the urinary bladder, bilateral hydro- nephrosis and hydroureter complicated by oligo- hydramnios in more severe cases

c. Fetal ascites from whatever cause: abdominal decom- pression during intrauterine life leading to prune belly appearance of the abdomen

d. Prostatic hypoplasia resulting in a functional urethral obstruction leading to development of the prune-belly syndrome

e. Primary mesodermal defect simultaneously affecting the formation of abdominal musculature and abnor- malities in the lower urinary tract

f. Rare association of chromosome abnormalities i. Trisomy 13

ii. Trisomy 18

iii. Turner syndrome with fetal ascites (pathogenetic mechanism thought to involve abdominal disten- tion by ascites rather than by urinary obstruction) iv. Ring X chromosome lacking XIST

v. Cat-eye syndrome vi. Rarely with trisomy 21

vii. Mosaic unbalanced chromosome constitution of chromosome 16

viii. Presence of a small additional chromosome fragment

ix. Interstitial deletion of chromosome 1 [del(1) (q25q32)]

2. Pathogenesis: abdominal wall hypoplasia as a nonspe- cific lesion resulting from fetal abdominal distension of various causes

3. Terminologies

a. Prune belly: a descriptive term for a wrinkled and flaccid abdominal wall secondary to stretched skin, soft tissues, and muscles of the abdomen

b. Prune-belly syndrome generally used to indicate the condition having prune belly, cryptorchidism, and abnormalities of the urinary tract

4. Causes of urine flow impairment/obstruction a. Renal causes

i. Pelvi-ureteric junction anomaly ii. Vesico-ureteric junction anomaly iii. Posterior urethral valves

iv. Duplex systems

v. Ureterocele/ectopic ureter vi. Urethral atresia

vii. Cloacal anomaly viii. Vesico-ureteric reflux

ix. Megaureter

x. Megacystis microcolon xi. Hypoperistalsis syndrome b. Extrarenal causes

i. Sacrococcygeal teratoma ii. Hydrometacolpos iii. Other pelvic masses

CLINICAL FEATURES

1. Broad spectrum in severity

2. Nearly 95% of cases occurring in males 3. Abdomen

a. Partial or complete absence of the abdominal muscu- lature

b. Thin/lax protruding abdominal wall c. Wrinkled abdominal skin

d. Visible intra-abdominal intestinal patterns through thin abdominal wall

4. Genitourinary anomalies

a. Bilateral cryptorchidism in males b. Urethral obstruction

c. Dilated/hypertrophic bladder

d. Dilated urethra, particularly the prostatic urethra e. Dilated/tortuous ureters

f. Renal dysplasia/hypoplasia with cystic changes g. Hydronephrosis

h. Absence or hypoplasia of the prostate i. Ventral body wall defects

i. Cloacal exstrophy ii. Bladder exstrophy iii. Hypo/epispadias

821

(2)

j. Potter sequence i. Oligohydramnios ii. Potter face

iii. Pulmonary hypoplasia iv. Other deformations 5. Secondary malformations

a. Gastrointestinal obstruction i. Malrotation

ii. Atresia iii. Stenosis

iv. Volvulus v. Splenic torsion vi. Imperforate anus vii. Anorectal agenesis

b. Limb and other skeletal abnormalities believed to be the direct result of oligohydramnios with resultant fetal crowding

i. Talipes equinovarus ii. Metatarsus adductus iii. Vertical talus

iv. Hip dislocation v. Arthrogryposis

vi. Pectus excavatum/carinatum vii. Congenital muscular torticollis viii. Infantile scoliosis

ix. Severe leg maldevelopment a) Generalized hypoplasia b) Complete absence c) Terminal defects c. Cardiac malformations

i. Tetralogy of Fallot ii. Ventriculoseptal defect d. Cleft lip

e. Spina bifida

f. Association with diverse chromosome syndromes i. Trisomy 13

ii. Trisomy 18 iii. Turner syndrome

iv. Cat-eye syndrome v. Trisomy 21 vi. Others 6. Prognosis

a. High mortality although compatible with long-term survival

i. Stillbirth or death by one moth of age in 20% of cases

ii. Death by the second year for additional 30% of cases

b. Causes of death

i. Renal failure secondary to renal dysplasia pres- ent at birth

ii. Pulmonary complications including lung hypoplasia

iii. Infection associated with urinary stasis or opera- tive interventions

DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATIONS

1. Renal and bladder ultrasound 2. Contrast voiding cystourethrogram 3. Radiography

a. Hypoplastic lungs with flared lower ribs secondary to the distended abdomen

b. Diffusely distended flanks

c. Dilated/dysplastic calyces of the kidneys d. Markedly dilated/tortuous ureters e. Vertical and trabeculated bladder f. A wide and long posterior urethra g. Cryptorchidism

4. Histology of the abdominal wall

a. Muscle atrophy (degeneration of already formed muscle), not of primitive muscle

b. The finding supports the theory that the abdominal muscle hypoplasia is a nonspecific lesion, resulting from fetal abdominal distension of various causes 5. Chromosome analysis for multiple congenital anomalies

GENETIC COUNSELING

1. Recurrence risk

a. Patient’s sib: not increased unless in autosomal reces- sive inheritance (which is still unclear)

b. Patient’s offspring: not increased 2. Prenatal diagnosis by ultrasonography

a. Signs of fetal abdominal laxity (characteristic abdom- inal appearance) associated with fetal urinary tract abnormalities

i. Amniotic fluid wave produced by fetal movement ii. Sinusoidal undulation of the fetal anterior abdominal wall produced by tapping the mater- nal abdomen

b. A distended bladder (megacystis) and ureters c. Cryptorchidism

d. Oligohydramnios e. Fetal ascites

f. Lung hypoplasia g. Associated anomalies

i. Other renal anomalies (25%) ii. Extra-renal abnormalities (12%)

a) Anorectal anomalies b) VATER syndrome c) Esophageal atresia

d) Pattern compatible to specific chromosomal abnormality

3. Management

a. Orchidopexy for cryptorchidism b. Treatment of vesicoureteral dysfunction

i. Temporary diversion ii. Ureteral reconstruction

c. Treatment of vesicourethral dysfunction i. Reduction cystoplasty

ii. Internal urethrotomy iii. Megalourethra repair d. Abdominal wall reconstruction

e. Vesico-amniotic shunt placement for suspected pre- natal obstructive uropathy: remains controversial

REFERENCES

Amacker EA, Grass FS, Hickey DE, et al.: An association of prune belly anom- aly with trisomy 21. Am J Med Genet 23:919–923, 1986.

Beckman H, Rehder H, Rauskolb R: Prune belly sequence associated with trisomy 13. Am J Med Genet 19:603–604, 1984.

(3)

Bosman G, Reuss A, Nijman JM, et al.: Prenatal diagnosis, management and outcome of fetal uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Ultrasound Med Biol 17:117–120, 1991.

Burton BK, Dillerd RG: Prune belly syndrome: Observation supporting the hypothesis of abdominal over distention. Am J Med Genet 17:669–672, 1984.

Christopher CR, Spinelli A, Severt D: Ultrasonic diagnosis of prune-belly syn- drome. Obstet Gynecol 59:391–394, 1982.

Cooperberg PL, Romalis G, Wright V: Megacystis (prune-belly syndrome):

sonographic demonstration in utero. J Can Assoc Radiol 30:120–121, 1979.

Drake DP, Stevens P, Eckstein HB: Hydronephrosis secondary to uretero-pelvic obstruction in children: a review of 14 years’ experience. J Urol 119:649–651, 1978.

Eagle JF, Barret GS: Congenital deficiency of abdominal musculature with associated genitourinary anomalies: A syndrome. Report of 9 cases.

Pediatrics 6:721–736, 1950.

Freedman AL, Bukowski TP, Smith CA, et al.: Fetal therapy for obstructive uropathy: specific outcomes diagnosis. J Urol 156:720–724, 1996.

Frydman M, Magenis RE, Mohandas TK, et al.: Chromosome abnormalities in infants with prune belly anomaly: Association with trisomy 18. Am J Med Genet 15:145–148, 1983.

Genest DR, Driscoll SG, Bieber FR: Complexities of limb anomalies: the lower extremity in the “prune belly” phenotype. Teratology 44:365–371, 1991.

Green NE, Lowery ER, Thomas R: Orthopaedic aspects of prune belly syn- drome. J Pediatr Orthop 13:496–501, 1993.

Harley LM, Chen Y, Rattner WH: Prune belly syndrome. J Urol 108:174–176, 1972.

Ives EJ: The abdominal muscle deficiency triad syndrome-experience with ten cases. Birth Defects Original Article Series 10:127–135, 1974.

Lattimer JK: Congenital deficiency of abdominal musculature and associated genitourinary anomalies. J Urol 79:343–352, 1958.

Leeners B, Sauer I, Schefels J, et al.: Prune-belly syndrome: therapeutic options including in utero placement of a vesicoamniotic shunt. J Clin Ultrasound 28:500–507, 2000.

Lubinsky M, Doyle K, Trunca C: The association of “prune-belly” with Turner’s syndrome. Am J Dis Child 134:1171–1172, 1980.

Moerman P, Fryns JP, Goddeeris P: Prune belly syndrome, a secondary urethral functional obstruction due to prostatic hypoplasia. J Genet Hum 32:141–143, 1984.

Moerman P, Fryns J-P, Goddeeris P, et al.: pathogenesis of the prune-belly syn- drome: a functional urethral obstruction caused by prostatic hypoplasia.

Pediatrics 73:470–475, 1984.

Monie IW, Monie BJ: Prune belly syndrome and fetal ascites. Teratology 19:111–117, 1979.

Mouriquand PDE, Whitten M, Pracros J-P: Pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of prenatal upper tract dilatation. Prenatal Diagn 21:942–951, 2001.

Nunn IN, Stephens FD: The triad syndrome: A composite anomaly of the abdominal wall, urinary system, and testes. J Urol 86:782–784, 1961.

Pagon RA, Smith DW, Shepard TH: Urethral obstruction malformation com- plex: a cause of abdominal muscle deficiency and the “prune belly”.

J Pediatr 94:900–906, 1979.

Parker RW: Absence of abdominal muscles in an infant-extensive degenerating nevus of bladder-gastric ulcer treated by laparotomy. Lancet 1:1252–1254, 1895.

Osler W: Congenital absence of abdominal muscle with distended and hyper- trophied urinary bladder. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 12:331, 1901.

Pramanik AK, Altshuler G, Light IJ, et al.: Prune-belly syndrome associated with Potter (renal nonfunction) syndrome. Am J Dis Child 131:672–674, 1977.

Qazi QH, Kaufman S, Sher J, et al.: Chromosomal anomaly in prune belly syn- drome. Hum Genet 20:265–267, 1978.

Rogers LW, Ostrow PT: The prune belly syndrome. Report of 20 cases and description of a lethal variant. J Pediatr 83:786–793, 1973.

Scarbrough PR, Files B, Carroll AJ, et al.: Interstitial deletion of chromosome 1 [del(1)(q25q32)] in an infant with prune belly sequence. Prenat Diagn 8:169–174, 1988.

Shimada K, Hosokawa S, Tohda A, et al.: Histology of the fetal prune belly syndrome with reference to the efficacy of prenatal decompression. Int J Urol 7:161–166, 2000.

Stevenson RE, Schroer RJ, Collins J, et al.: Fetal ascites: the underlying cause for prune belly. Proc Greenwood Genet Ctr 6:16–21, 1987.

Straub E ,Spranger J: Etiology and pathogenesis of the prune belly syndrome.

Kidney Int 20:695–699, 1981.

Tuch BA, Smith TK: Prune-belly syndrome. A report of twelve cases and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg 60A:109–111, 1978 Welch KJ, Kearney GP: Abdominal musculature deficiency syndrome: prune

belly. J Urol 111:693–700, 1974.

Woodhouse CR, Ransley PG, Innes-Williams D: Prune belly syndrome—

report of 47 cases. Arch Dis Child 57:856–859, 1982.

(4)

Fig. 1. A premature male neonate with prune-belly syndrome due to urethral atresia. He lived for 2 hours. There was a massive dilation and hypertrophy of the urinary bladder. Mild hydronephrosis was seen in one kidney but the second kidney was hypoplastic. The anterior abdominal wall showed muscle deficiency. Additional anomalies included imperforate anus with vesicorectal fistula, secundum type atrial septal defect of the heart, mild coarctation of the aorta, and bilat- eral talipes equinovarus.

Fig. 2. A male fetus with prune belly syndrome due to severe urethral stenosis. There were marked dilatation of the proximal urethra, blad- der and bilateral ureters. Mild hydronephrosis and cystic renal dyspla- sia were seen in both kidneys. There were no other anomalies.

(5)

Fig. 3. An infant with prune belly syndrome showing thin, flaccid abdominal wall through which intra-abdominal intestinal patterns are visible.

Fig. 4. A postmortem infant with prune belly syndrome showing flac- cid and wrinkling abdominal wall with visible intestinal patterns.

Fig. 5. A neonate with prune belly syndrome showing wrinkling abdominal wall due to multicystic kidneys. The infant also has dupli- cated great toes.

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

Infine, Tania (6 anni) presentava caratteristiche cliniche ai limiti inferiori di norma, accrescimento staturo-ponderale nella norma, sordità neurosensoriale

Alcuni studi centrati su singole opere rivelano la ricchezza e il profondo significato delle loro diverse e cangianti versioni intermediali, mostrando anche in questo secondo Focus

Molecular Imaging Center, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences University of Torino. The low sensitivity of this technique is a significant drawback, and one

ial exostosis-like projections, depression of medial portion of tibial plateau, and coarse reticular bone pattern, most promi- nent at the metaphyses and epiphyses. Patient

eyes Ocular findings visual symptoms (18/28) Decreased visionR/LLR/LR/L7 Transient blurringR/LR/LR/LR/LR/LR/LR/LR/L16 Transient diplopiaR/LR/LR/LR/L8 Transient field

The detector response model was verified by comparing the distributions of cluster observables in data and simulation. The observables studied are the cluster size given, the number

Combined alleles for the PTPN22 and CTLA-4 genes, haplotypes for the MBL2 gene and a possi- ble association of these combined alleles and haplotype with clinical conditions in

Meigs syndrome is a  rare gynecological condition characterized by the presence of a benign ovarian solid tumor accompanied by ascites and hydrothorax.. Rarely it is associated