• Non ci sono risultati.

Final exam project - 2007

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Condividi "Final exam project - 2007"

Copied!
2
0
0

Testo completo

(1)

Final exam project - 2007

Problem 1)

Consider the 2.4GHz radio link described here below. An EIRP of 3,14dBW is emitted from the Tx.

The link is operating in the environment depicted in the figure. Diffraction from horizontal edges can be neglected.

Tx Receiver Position (x=25, y=11, z=2) (x=9, y=2, z=2)

Antenna Vertical λ/2 Dipole GMAX=2,14dBi Vertical λ/2 Dipole GMAX=2,14dBi

The electromagnetic characteristics of building walls are: εr=5, σ=0.01 [S/m]

Environment topology (top view)

Question 1.1) It is requested to compute the total coherent received power and the RMS delay spread assuming max one interaction per ray (Nev=1, edge diffraction or reflection only). Diffuse scattering can be neglected.

Question 1.2) It is requested to give an estimate of fast fading fluctuation depth (approximate number of dB’s).

Problem 2)

The Attached files “EF_delaySpread_meas.txt” and “EF_delaySpread_sim.txt” contain the measured and RT-simulated RMS delay spread corresponding to route EF, in the central Helsinki environment depicted in the figures here-below. The active transmitter is on BS1. Carrier frequency is 2.154 GHz. Alignment between measurement and simulation can be inaccurate, with an uncertainty range of +/- 20 m. The spatial step must be derived from the figure, and is the same for both the measurement and the simulation file.

RT simulation has been performed with 3 events (Nev=3), max 2 diffractions.

Question 2.1) It is requested to estimate the prediction performance in terms of mean error and standard deviation of the error.

Question 2.2) It is requested to comment over the measurement behaviour and the deviations between measurement and simulation.

1/2

(2)

Environment representation (part of)

City map reference

2/2

Riferimenti

Documenti correlati

This Thesis proposes a conceptual formulation for controlling the resulting mechanical properties of Recycled Aggregate Concretes (RACs) via generalised mix-design rules intended at

Ideally your presentation should prove you have “matured” a vision as a software architect; it is ok if you copy pictures from literature (cite your sources) but I

Concerning the three ®rms case, our main results are: …i† whenever re- entry is costless, if the two-®rm cartel containing the ®rms with lower average cost functions is feasible

This in order to understand to what extent it could be really possible to reinvent education and vocational training in Italy, looking at the best practices end outcomes of

Since algebraic and geometric multiplicities differ and hence there is no basis of R 4 consisting of eigenvectors of A, the matrix A cannot be

Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is not possible1. Otherwise indicate why diagonalization is

these layers consisted of special structures for the dialogue (informal Contact Group, Mediterranean conferences), access to deliberations of participating States (access to

This is particularly striking when we think that there are currently 23.5 million unemployed